Wavelength division multiplexed (WDM) optical communication systems are known in which multiple optical transmitters supply each of a corresponding one of a plurality of modulated optical signals. The optical signals may be combined by an optical combiner or multiplexer in a transmit node and supplied to an end of an optical communication path. The combined optical signals may then propagate along the optical communication path to a receive node, where the optical signals are demultiplexed and each is supplied to a corresponding optical receiver.
Each optical transmitter may include a laser that outputs light having a particular wavelength and a modulator that modulates the light in accordance with a data stream to provide a respective one of the modulated optical signals. Other optical components may also be provided. Typically, optical fibers or other waveguides are provided to direct light from one component to the next, e.g., from the laser to the modulator, and from the modulator to the combiner. An interface may exist between an end face of the fiber and part of the component that receives the light. Light may scatter at such interfaces, and such scattered light may be fed back to the laser and interfere with the operation of the laser. Alternatively, the scattered light may interfere with optical signals propagating in the waveguides. Often the waveguides are tilted or angled in such a way as to reduce such scattering back into the source waveguides and the lasers whereby the waveguide may “dodge” the scattered light.
In another example, the optical combiners or couplers may include a portion through which unwanted portions of the combined optical signals may escape. Such light may also constitute undesired feedback to the lasers as well as interfere with optical signals propagating in the waveguides. Accordingly, additional waveguides may be provided at such “dump ports” to direct the undesired light away from waveguides carrying optical signals and the lasers.
Conventional WDM optical communication systems often include discrete components, such that, for example, the lasers, modulators, and other components are housed separately from one another or provided on separate substrates. Other WDM optical communication systems, however, include photonic integrated circuits (PICs) in which these components may be integrated on a common substrate. As the density and size of PICs increases, the conventional approaches to reducing scattered light may be impractical due to the layout or configuration of various components on the PIC.
Accordingly, there is a need for devices that can be readily integrated on a PIC and reduce unwanted light.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate one or more implementations described herein and, together with the description, explain these implementations. In the drawings:
a, and 7b are diagrams of example absorptive structures; and
c are diagrams of example scattering structures.
The following detailed description refers to the accompanying drawings. The same reference numbers in different drawings may identify the same or similar elements.
Various devices are proposed to minimize optical feedback to the laser or optical noise in the signals supplied from the output waveguides of the PIC. For example, devices may be provided to capture and absorb unintentionally scattered light that escapes from a waveguide or is present in the substrate. In another example, structures may be provided to disperse or scatter light output from a dump port of a coupler. As used herein, a “dump port” is a waveguide that supplies guided optical light that is not intended as an optical or electrical output.
The devices may include semiconductor layers that constitute other components on the PIC and thus may be easily manufactured and readily integrated on the PIC. These devices may include a waveguide core that captures unguided light, and a layer, such as a metal, that absorbs the captured light. In one example, a spiral waveguide is provided, as a scattering structure, and in another example, a multi-mode interference (MMI) device is provided that has a tapered structure. Alternatively, combinations of these devices may be provided at various locations on the same PIC.
In one implementation, the absorbing and/or scattering devices can be placed in locations along a path or adjacent to a path between where the unwanted light originated and where the unwanted light can interfere with an optical signal (from wanted light) being received by the receiver. For example, the absorbing and/or scattering devices can be placed near the optical sources, near waveguides, and/or near the multiplexers or receivers.
Additionally, the absorbing and/or scattering devices can be located at locations where scattering may be expected to occur, such as at places of device discontinuity, bends in a waveguide, and/or locations where light is intentionally scattered. For example, the absorbing and/or scattering devices can be placed near devices in the PICs, at bends in the waveguides, and/or at guided terminal ports (e.g., input ports, output ports or dump ports) or terminal ends of waveguides. Further, structures consistent with the present disclosure may be provided at transitions between different wave-guiding structures (e.g., transitions between epitaxial layers, such as a butt joint, and transitions between deep and shallow-etched waveguide).
In one or more implementations, absorbing devices can include band gap absorption devices, metallic absorption devices, and/or absorptive guidance devices, and scattering devices can include optical devices that scatter light using geometric structures. By absorbing unintentionally scattered light and scattering light from a coupler dump port, for example, optical feedback to the laser is minimized which would otherwise cause broadening of the laser line-width. In addition, phase, amplitude, and spectral noise in the optical signals output from the PIC is reduced. Scattering and capturing/absorbing devices, as disclosed herein are passive, and do not require application an electrical bias, such as a current or voltage bias, as in the case of known active absorption techniques. Accordingly, the devices disclosed herein do not consume power and dissipate minimal power through passive absorption, which may include grounding various diode structures discussed below. As a result, scattering and light capturing/absorbing structures consistent with the present disclosure do not appreciably heat the PIC, as opposed to active absorption devices. Reverse-biasing the diodes disclosed herein can improve absorption efficiency, but with increased power consumption. Such reverse biasing, however, is unnecessary.
Further, the structures disclosed herein may include the same epitaxial layers as other devices in a PIC. In addition, there is no need to rout the undesired light off the substrate or PIC. More compact PIC layouts can minimize power consumption.
An exemplary system which may include absorbing and/or scattering devices will next be described below with reference to
As further shown in
One of transmitter blocks 12-1 is shown in greater detail in
It is noted that a so-called “nested Mach-Zehnder” modulator may also be provided instead of the modulator configuration shown in
As further shown in
Typically, structure 25 is not biased with a voltage. However, a biased element 25-b may optionally be provided in addition to structure 25 to absorb any light that is not absorbed or scattered by structure 25. Element 25-b will next be described in greater detail below with reference to
As shown in
As noted above, optical signals output from node 11 and multiplexer 13-2 propagate along optical communication path 14 to receive node 18, where the optical signals are separated into groups by demultiplexer 15-1, and each optical signal group is provided to a respective one of RxPIC-1 to RxPIC-n. In RxPIC-1, one of the optical signal groups is demultiplexed by demultiplexer 15-2 and each optical signal in that group is supplied to corresponding one of receivers (Rx) 17-1 to 17-n.
In one example, demultiplexer 15-2 may include an arrayed waveguide grating (AWG), such as AWG 32 shown in
Alternatively, waveguides can be constructed to couple the light energy associated with any one focal point on an edge of slab 37 to a light absorbing material. For example, as further shown in
Thus light absorbing/scattering structures may be provided in both the TxPICs and RxPICs. Examples of such structures will next be described with reference to
Light absorptive core 540 can be made of any light-absorptive material that can provide band gap absorption of the stray light, such as a semiconductor or semiconductor compound or another band gap absorptive material with an appropriate band gap (e.g., C-band (1530-1560 nm), S-band (1460-1530 nm)). In one implementation, the material for light-absorptive core 540 can be chosen for absorbing light (e.g., unwanted light) based upon the frequency of the light produced by a nearby light source. For example, if an optical source, such as a laser in transmitter block 12-1, is creating light at a particular frequency, then the stray light would be at the same particular frequency, and the absorptive core material can be chosen to absorb light at the particular frequency (or at other frequencies of adjacent optical sources including or excluding the particular frequency).
As illustrated in
In addition, to the diode geometry described above, structure 500 may constitute a resistor. In that case, each of layers 520, 530, 540, and 550 may have the same conductivity type.
As noted above, absorptive metal layer 610 may be provided to absorb light captured by core layer 630 that was unguided in PIC 206. For example, absorptive metal layer 610 can be used to absorb light that was unintentionally scattered due to light escaping from a waveguide or any guided component of PIC 206.
Absorptive metal layer 610 may be a light absorbing layer including any metal, such as Ti, W, Al, Au, or combinations thereof, e.g., alloys or multiple metal layers. The amount of light absorbed can depend on material properties, such as composition, temperature, surface roughness, oxide layers and contamination, and also the device geometry that can enhance overlap of guided light to the absorptive metal. In addition, core layer 630 may capture scattered light from underlying layers or the substrate into a guided mode having significant overlap with the absorptive metal 610, thereby enhancing overall efficiency of the absorptive structure.
In one exemplary implementation, undoped or p-type material layer 720 can include InP, and undoped or n-type material layer 740 can include InP. Additionally, or alternatively, LAM structure 700-a may be passive and can be provided with LAM layer 710 on three sides of optical core layer 730 provided that LAM layer 710 is sufficiently close to optical core 730 to absorb light, but not so close as to prevent light from being guided. LAM layer 710 may assist in absorption of unwanted light in PIC 206 by absorbing guided light, such as light from a dump port. LAM layer 710 may be a light absorbing layer including any metal, such as Ti, W, Al, Au, or combinations thereof, e.g., alloys or multiple metal layers.).
Spiral waveguide structure 800 can be made of the same material as waveguide 454, and can be shaped to become progressively narrower and spiraled to cause guided light in waveguide 454 to scatter while suppressing back-reflected light.
Additionally, or alternatively, spiral waveguide structure 800 may be fabricated as any sized structure. In one implementation, spiral waveguide structure 800 can be provided if the fabrication process, geometry limitations, or other restraints make absorptive structures (or other scattering structures) impractical or impossible on a TxPIC or RxPIC. For example, a progressively narrowing, spiral waveguide structure 800 can effectively scatter initially guided light with low return loss. As another example, one or more spiral waveguide structures 800 may be fabricated into compact structures that may fit between waveguides or any other components in either the TxPICs or the RxPICs.
A transition between sections 910 and 920 is abrupt and non-adiabatic. In that case, MMI 900 may be configured so that undesired light is not reflected back to input waveguide 905. Rather, such undesired light is scattered out the sides of MMI 900 (see arrows 915 and 925) and/or into the substrate instead.
Tapered MMI device 900 can be made of the same material as waveguide 130. In another implementation, tapered MMI device 900 can be made of a different material from waveguide 130, and can include more than one material, including transparent and absorptive materials.
Additionally, or alternatively, tapered MIMI device 900 can suppress reflected light from returning to input waveguide 905 by using a combination of tapered MIMI device 900 and one or more additional absorptive/scattering structures. In one implementation, tapered MIMI device 900 can transmit light away from input waveguide 905, scatter light 915, 925, and direct remaining light to output waveguide 930 that can then be fed into one or more additional absorptive/scattering structures. For example, spiral waveguide structure 800 can be attached to tapered MIMI device 900, such that the input 810 of spiral waveguide structure 800 is attached to output waveguide 930 of tapered MMI device 900.
As discussed herein, guided absorptive/scattering structures AB can be specifically selected based on the type of absorbing and/or scattering desired in a particular location and/or for a particular purpose.
Selection of which light capturing/absorptive structures AB and can be made based upon several factors, such as space available, aspect ratios, type of unwanted light (guided vs. scattered), or amount of unwanted light. For example, spiral waveguide structures 800 and tapered MIMI devices 900 may be fit between waveguides or other components, while other guided absorptive/scattering structures AB may not. As another example, metal-absorptive structure 600 can advantageously be selected to be placed after bends in waveguides to absorb unwanted, unguided light that may escape from a first waveguide and potentially interfere with the signal in a second waveguide.
Consistent with a further aspect of the present disclosure, multi-mode interference (MIMI) structure may be provided that has reduced reflections. Such structures will next be described with reference to
In
In addition, MMI portion 1115 has a first length L1 defined by first edge E1 of first side region 1130 and first edge E1′ of second side region 1140. MMI portion 1115 has a second length L2 defined by second edge E2 of first side region 1130 and edge E2′ of second side region 1140. Further, MMI portion 1115 has third length L3 defined by third edge E3 of first side region 1130 and third edge E3′ of second side region 1140. Lengths L1, L2, and L3 are in a direction of propagation of light from input portions 1110, 1112 to output portions 1120, 1122. Length L3 is typically less than lengths L1 and L2, which may be equal to one another.
An alternative waveguide 1200 is shown in
Both waveguides 1100 and 1200 may constitute 2×2 MMI couplers that receive optical signals at the input portions thereof. For example, input portions 1110 and 1112 may receive optical signals having wavelengths λ1 and λ2, respectively. As is generally understood, light input on portion 1100 may be supplied to either one of or both output portions 1120 or 1122 depending on the temperature or geometric parameters, i.e., the dimensions of the MMI region 1115. Similarly, depending on such parameters, light input on portion 1112 may similarly be supplied to one or both of output portions 1120 to 1122. Regardless of the desired configuration of MMI regions 1115, however, in the absence of edges E1, E2, E3 and E1′, E2′, and E3′, light may be reflected in portions of waveguide 1100 between output portions 1220, 1222 and MMI portion 1215, i.e., portions where the effective refractive index may chance. Such reflections may interfere with the input light causing errors in transmission. Consistent with the present disclosure, however, by providing edges E1-E3 and E1′-E3′ such reflections are reduced. Edges E1, E2, E1′ and E2′ in
MMI portion 1315 may have two lengths L1 and L2 in a direction of light propagation from input portion 1310 to one or both of output portions 1320 and 1322. Length L1 is defined by edges E1 and E1′ and length L2 is defined by edges E2 and E2′. Lengths L1 and L2 are typically different from one another. Waveguide structure 1300 also has fewer reflections than would otherwise occur in the absence of edges E1, E2, E1′ and E2′.
In another example shown in
A further example of a low reflection 2×2 MMI coupler will next be described with reference to
In addition, the first (1620) and second (1622) output portions extend away from second side region 1640 of MMI portion 1615 in a third direction (as indicated by arrow 1602) away from second side region 1640. Distance D between the first (1620) and second (1622) output portions adjacent MMI portion 1615 narrow in a fourth direction (as indicated by arrow 1604) toward second side region 1640 of MMI portion 1615. That is, both the input and output portions taper toward the MMI portion.
As further shown in
2×2 MMI couplers having the configuration shown in
The foregoing description provides illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the embodiments to the precise form disclosed. For example, while the absorptive and scattering structures were described herein as being used in the TxPICs and the RxPICs, the absorptive and/or scattering structures can be used in other optical devices, such as discrete component optical transmitters, receivers, or other optical devices that can have issues with unwanted light. Modifications and variations are possible in light of the above disclosure or may be acquired from practice of the embodiments.
Even though particular combinations of features are recited in the claims and/or disclosed in the specification, these combinations are not intended to limit the disclosure of the possible embodiments. In fact, many of these features may be combined in ways not specifically recited in the claims and/or disclosed in the specification. For example, the absorptive structure may include deep levels, such as degenerately doped semiconductor material, e.g., semiconductor material having an n or p-type impurity concentration of at least 1020/cm3. Alternatively, the absorptive structure may include one or more semi-metals, such as arsenic, carbon, tin, bismuth, mercury telluride or other materials having comparable absorption coefficients.
No element, act, or instruction used in the present application should be construed as critical or essential unless explicitly described as such. Also, as used herein, the article “a” is intended to include one or more items. Where only one item is intended, the term “one” or similar language is used. Further, the phrase “based on” is intended to mean “based, at least in part, on” unless explicitly stated otherwise.
The present application for patent is a divisional of, and claims priority to, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/732,163, entitled “LIGHT ABSORPTION AND SCATTERING DEVICES IN A PROTONIC INTEGRATED CIRCUIT THAT MINIMIZE OPTICAL FEEDBACK AND NOISE,” filed Dec. 31, 2012, pending, assigned to the assignee hereof, and expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3715461 | Hanlon | Feb 1973 | A |
4490735 | Schwaderer | Dec 1984 | A |
4939682 | Falk | Jul 1990 | A |
5591662 | Zambrano | Jan 1997 | A |
6028663 | O'Mongain et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6091536 | Usami | Jul 2000 | A |
6771682 | Peters | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7058241 | Sugiyama | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7394953 | Nagarajan | Jul 2008 | B1 |
8120925 | Tanaka | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8363990 | Skogen | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8532500 | Wach | Sep 2013 | B1 |
9494734 | Jain | Nov 2016 | B1 |
20020009253 | Kawazawa | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030035607 | Brophy | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030095737 | Welch | May 2003 | A1 |
20030173571 | Kish, Jr. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040033004 | Welch | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040086249 | Zoorob | May 2004 | A1 |
20040135136 | Takahashi | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050100272 | Gilman | May 2005 | A1 |
20050249509 | Nagarajan et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20080044128 | Kish, Jr. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080090341 | Tanaka | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080138088 | Welch et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20100247030 | Furuyama | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100303476 | Barton et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100320443 | Jiang | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110064355 | Soma | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110147874 | Nagarajan | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110255303 | Nichol et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110293216 | Lipson | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20140105544 | Ushida | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140110272 | Wulf | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140185979 | Evans et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140185980 | Lei | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20170263793 | Ueno | Sep 2017 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
R. Hanfoug et al., “Reduced reflections from multimode interference couplers”, Electronics Letters Apr. 13, 2006 vol. 42 No. 8, Apr. 13, 2006, p. 465-466. |
R. Hanfoug et al. “A Multimode Interference coupler with low reflections,” Proceedings Symposium IEEE/LEOS Benelux Chapter, 2005, Mons, pp. 97-100. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170146735 A1 | May 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13732163 | Dec 2012 | US |
Child | 15192096 | US |