Light sensitive display with switchable detection modes for detecting a fingerprint

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9971456
  • Patent Number
    9,971,456
  • Date Filed
    Monday, September 19, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 15, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
A display device including a surface for viewing an image comprising a stack of layers configured to display the image. A processor is configured to include switchable detection modes. Each mode is preconfigured to detect an object on or near the surface based on a given sensitivity to light, and has a different sensitivity than other of the modes.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present invention relates to touch sensitive displays.


Touch sensitive screens (“touch screens”) are devices that typically mount over a display such as a cathode ray tube. With a touch screen, a user can select from options displayed on the display's viewing surface by touching the surface adjacent to the desired option, or, in some designs, touching the option directly. Common techniques employed in these devices for detecting the location of a touch include mechanical buttons, crossed beams of infrared light, acoustic surface waves, capacitance sensing, and resistive materials.


For example, Kasday, U.S. Pat. No. 4,484,179 discloses an optically-based touch screen comprising a flexible clear membrane supported above a glass screen whose edges are fitted with photodiodes. When the membrane is flexed into contact with the screen by a touch, light which previously would have passed through the membrane and glass screen is trapped between the screen surfaces by total internal reflection. This trapped light travels to the edge of the glass screen where it is detected by the photodiodes which produce a corresponding output signal. The touch position is determined by coordinating the position of the CRT raster beam with the timing of the output signals from the several photodiodes. The optically-based touch screen increases the expense of the display, and increases the complexity of the display.


Denlinger, U.S. Pat. No. 4,782,328 on the other hand, relies on reflection of ambient light from the actual touch source, such as a finger or pointer, into a pair of photosensors mounted at corners of the touch screen. By measuring the intensity of the reflected light received by each photosensor, a computer calculates the location of the touch source with reference to the screen. The inclusion of the photosensors and associated computer increases the expense of the display, and increases the complexity of the display.


May, U.S. Pat. No. 5,105,186, discloses a liquid crystal touch screen that includes an upper glass sheet and a lower glass sheet separated by spacers. Sandwiched between the glass sheets is a thin layer of liquid crystal material. The inner surface of each piece of glass is coated with a transparent, conductive layer of metal oxide. Affixed to the outer surface of the upper glass sheet is an upper polarizer which comprises the display's viewing surface. Affixed to the outer surface of glass sheet is a lower polarizer. Forming the back surface of the liquid crystal display is a transflector adjacent to the lower polarizer. A transflector transmits some of the light striking its surface and reflects some light. Adjacent to transflector is a light detecting array of light dependent resistors whose resistance varies with the intensity of light detected. The resistance increases as the light intensity decreases, such as occurs when a shadow is cast on the viewing surface. The light detecting array detects a change in the light transmitted through the transflector caused by a touching of viewing surface. Similar to touch sensitive structures affixed to the front of the liquid crystal stack, the light sensitive material affixed to the rear of the liquid crystal stack similarly pose potential problems limiting contrast of the display, increasing the expense of the display, and increasing the complexity of the display.


Touch screens that have a transparent surface which mounts between the user and the display's viewing surface have several drawbacks. For example, the transparent surface, and other layers between the liquid crystal material and the transparent surface may result in multiple reflections which decreases the display's contrast and produces glare. Moreover, adding an additional touch panel to the display increases the manufacturing expense of the display and increases the complexity of the display. Also, the incorporation of the touch screen reduces the overall manufacturing yield of the display.


Accordingly, what is desired is a touch screen that does not significantly decrease the contrast ratio, does not significantly increase the glare, does not significantly increase the expense of the display, and does not significantly increase the complexity of the display.


The foregoing and other objectives, features, and advantages of the invention will be more readily understood upon consideration of the following detailed description of the invention, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a cross sectional view of a traditional active matrix liquid crystal display.



FIG. 2 is a schematic of the thin film transistor array.



FIG. 3 is a layout of the thin film transistor array of FIG. 2.



FIGS. 4A-4H is a set of steps suitable for constructing pixel electrodes and amorphous silicon thin-film transistors.



FIG. 5 illustrates pixel electrodes, color filters, and a black matrix.



FIG. 6 illustrates a schematic of the active matrix elements, pixel electrode, photo TFT, readout TFT, and a black matrix.



FIG. 7 illustrates a pixel electrode, photo TFT, readout TFT, and a black matrix.



FIG. 8 is a layout of the thin film transistor array of FIGS. 6 and 7.



FIG. 9 is a graph of the capacitive charge on the light sensitive elements as a result of touching the display at high ambient lighting conditions.



FIG. 10 is a graph of the capacitive charge on the light sensitive elements as a result of touching the display at low ambient lighting conditions.



FIG. 11 is a graph of the photo-currents in an amorphous silicon TFT array.



FIG. 12 is a graph of the capacitive charge on the light sensitive elements as a result of touching the display and providing light from a light pen.



FIG. 13 is an alternative layout of the pixel electrodes.



FIG. 14 illustrates a timing set for the layout of FIG. 13.



FIG. 15 illustrates a handheld device together with an optical wand.



FIG. 16 illustrates even/odd frame addressing.



FIG. 17 illustrates a front illuminated display.



FIG. 18 illustrates total internal reflections.



FIG. 19 illustrates a small amount of diffraction of the propagating light.



FIG. 20 illustrates significant diffraction as a result of a plastic pen.



FIG. 21 illustrates a shadow of a pointing device and a shadow with illuminated region of a pointing device.



FIG. 22 illustrates a modified black matrix arrangement.



FIG. 23 illustrates a light reflecting structure.



FIG. 24 illustrates a pen.



FIG. 25 illustrates a light guide and finger.



FIG. 26 illustrates a display with multiple sensor densities and optical elements.



FIG. 27 illustrates a display with memory maintaining material.



FIG. 28 illustrates another pen.



FIG. 29 illustrates another pen.



FIG. 30 illustrates another pen.



FIG. 31 illustrates another pen.



FIG. 32 illustrates another light guide.



FIG. 33 illustrates an image acquisition and processing technique.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring to FIG. 1, a liquid crystal display (LCD) 50 (indicated by a bracket) comprises generally, a backlight 52 and a light valve 54 (indicated by a bracket). Since liquid crystals do not emit light, most LCD panels are backlit with fluorescent tubes or arrays of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) that are built into the sides or back of the panel. To disperse the light and obtain a more uniform intensity over the surface of the display, light from the backlight 52 typically passes through a diffuser 56 before impinging on the light valve 54.


The transmittance of light from the backlight 52 to the eye of a viewer 58, observing an image displayed on the front of the panel, is controlled by the light valve 54. The light valve 54 normally includes a pair of polarizers 60 and 62 separated by a layer of liquid crystals 64 contained in a cell gap between glass or plastic plates, and the polarizers. Light from the backlight 52 impinging on the first polarizer 62 comprises electromagnetic waves vibrating in a plurality of planes. Only that portion of the light vibrating in the plane of the optical axis of the polarizer passes through the polarizer. In an LCD light valve, the optical axes of the first 62 and second 60 polarizer are typically arranged at an angle so that light passing through the first polarizer would normally be blocked from passing through the second polarizer in the series. However, the orientation of the translucent crystals in the layer of liquid crystals 64 can be locally controlled to either “twist” the vibratory plane of the light into alignment with the optical axes of the polarizer, permitting light to pass through the light valve creating a bright picture element or pixel, or out of alignment with the optical axis of one of the polarizers, attenuating the light and creating a darker area of the screen or pixel.


The surfaces of a first glass substrate 61 and a second glass substrate 63 form the walls of the cell gap and are buffed to produce microscopic grooves to physically align the molecules of liquid crystal 64 immediately adjacent to the walls. Molecular forces cause adjacent liquid crystal molecules to attempt to align with their neighbors with the result that the orientation of the molecules in the column of molecules spanning the cell gap twist over the length of the column. Likewise, the plane of vibration of light transiting the column of molecules will be “twisted” from the optical axis of the first polarizer 62 to a plane determined by the orientation of the liquid crystals at the opposite wall of the cell gap. If the wall of the cell gap is buffed to align adjacent crystals with the optical axis of the second polarizer, light from the backlight 52 can pass through the series of polarizers 60 and 62 to produce a lighted area of the display when viewed from the front of the panel (a “normally white” LCD).


To darken a pixel and create an image, a voltage, typically controlled by a thin film transistor, is applied to an electrode in an array of transparent electrodes deposited on the walls of the cell gap. The liquid crystal molecules adjacent to the electrode are attracted by the field produced by the voltage and rotate to align with the field. As the molecules of liquid crystal are rotated by the electric field, the column of crystals is “untwisted,” and the optical axes of the crystals adjacent to the cell wall are rotated progressively out of alignment with the optical axis of the corresponding polarizer progressively reducing the local transmittance of the light valve 54 and attenuating the luminance of the corresponding pixel. In other words, in a normally white twisted nematic device there are generally two modes of operation, one without a voltage applied to the molecules and one with a voltage applied to the molecules. With a voltage applied (e.g., driven mode) to the molecules the molecules rotate their polarization axis which results in inhibiting the passage of light to the viewer. Similarly, without a voltage applied (e.g., non-driven mode) the polarization axis is not rotated so that the passage of light is not inhibited to the viewer.


Conversely, the polarizers and buffing of the light valve can be arranged to produce a “normally black” LCD having pixels that are dark (light is blocked) when the electrodes are not energized and light when the electrodes are energized. Color LCD displays are created by varying the intensity of transmitted light for each of a plurality of primary color (typically, red, green, and blue) sub-pixels that make up a displayed pixel.


The aforementioned example was described with respect to a twisted nematic device. However, this description is only an example and other devices may likewise be used, including but not limited to, multi-domain vertical alignment, patterned vertical alignment, in-plane switching, and super-twisted nematic type LCDs. In addition other devices, such as for example, plasma displays, organic displays, active matrix organic light emitting display, electroluminescent displays, liquid crystal on silicon displays, reflective liquid crystal devices may likewise be used. For such displays the light emitting portion of the display, or portion of the display that permits the display of selected portions of light may be considered to selectively cause the pixels to provide light.


For an active matrix LCD (AMLCD) the inner surface of the second glass substrate 63 is normally coated with a continuous electrode while the first glass substrate 61 is patterned into individual pixel electrodes. The continuous electrode may be constructed using a transparent electrode, such as indium tin oxide. The first glass substrate 61 may include thin film transistors (TFTs) which act as individual switches for each pixel electrode (or group of pixel electrodes) corresponding to a pixel (or group of pixels). The TFTs are addressed by a set of multiplexed electrodes running along the gaps between the pixel electrodes. Alternatively the pixel electrodes may be on a different layer from the TFTs. A pixel is addressed by applying voltage (or current) to a selected line, which switches the TFT on and allows charge from the data line to flow onto the rear pixel electrodes. The combination of voltages between the front electrode and the pixel electrodes sets up a voltage across the pixels and turns the respective pixels on. The thin-film transistors are typically constructed from amorphous silicon, while other types of switching devices may likewise be used, such as for example, metal-insulator-metal diode and polysilicon thin-film transistors. The TFT array and pixel electrodes may alternatively be on the top of the liquid crystal material. Also, the continuous electrode may be patterned or portions selectively selected, as desired. Also the light sensitive elements may likewise be located on the top, or otherwise above, of the liquid crystal material, if desired.


Referring to FIG. 2, the active matrix layer may include a set of data lines and a set of select lines. Normally one data line is included for each column of pixels across the display and one select line is included for each row of pixels down the display, thereby creating an array of conductive lines. To load the data to the respective pixels indicating which pixels should be illuminated, normally in a row-by-row manner, a set of voltages are imposed on the respective data lines 204 which imposes a voltage on the sources 202 of latching transistors 200. The selection of a respective select line 210, interconnected to the gates 212 of the respective latching transistors 200, permits the voltage imposed on the sources 202 to be passed to the drain 214 of the latching transistors 200. The drains 214 of the latching transistors 200 are electrically connected to respective pixel electrodes and are capacitively coupled to a respective common line 221 through a respective Cst capacitor 218. In addition, a respective capacitance exists between the pixel electrodes enclosing the liquid crystal material, noted as capacitances Clc 222 (between the pixel electrodes and the common electrode on the color plate). The common line 221 provides a voltage reference. In other words, the voltage data (representative of the image to be displayed) is loaded into the data lines for a row of latching transistors 200 and imposing a voltage on the select line 210 latches that data into the holding capacitors and hence the pixel electrodes. Alternatively, the display may be operated based upon current levels.


Referring to FIG. 3, a schematic layout is shown of the active matrix layer. The pixel electrodes 230 are generally grouped into a “single” effective pixel so that a corresponding set of pixel electrodes 230 may be associated with respective color filters (e.g., red, green, blue). The latching transistors 200 interconnect the respective pixel electrodes 230 with the data lines and the select line. The pixel electrodes 230 may be interconnected to the common line 221 by the capacitors Cst 218. The pixels may include any desirable shape, any number of sub-pixels, and any set of color filters.


Referring to FIG. 4, the active matrix layer may be constructed using an amorphous silicon thin-film transistor fabrication process. The steps may include gate metal deposition (FIG. 4A), a photolithography/etch (FIG. 4B), a gate insulator and amorphous silicon deposition (FIG. 4C), a photolithography/etch (FIG. 4D), a source/drain metal deposition (FIG. 4E), a photolithography/etch (FIG. 4F), an ITO deposition (FIG. 4G), and a photolithography/etch (FIG. 4H). Other processes may likewise be used, as desired.


The present inventors considered different potential architectural touch panel schemes to incorporate additional optical layers between the polarizer on the front of the liquid crystal display and the front of the display. These additional layers include, for example, glass plates, wire grids, transparent electrodes, plastic plates, spacers, and other materials. In addition, the present inventors considered the additional layers with different optical characteristics, such as for example, birefringence, non-birefringence, narrow range of wavelengths, wide range of wavelengths, etc. After an extensive analysis of different potential configurations of the touch screen portion added to the display together with materials having different optical properties and further being applied to the different types of technologies (e.g., mechanical switches, crossed beams of infrared light, acoustic surface waves, capacitance sensing, and resistive membranes), the present inventors determined that an optimized touch screen is merely a tradeoff between different undesirable properties. Accordingly, the design of an optimized touch screen is an ultimately unsolvable task. In contrast to designing an improved touch screen, the present inventors came to the realization that modification of the structure of the active matrix liquid crystal device itself could provide an improved touch screen capability without all of the attendant drawbacks to the touch screen configuration located on the front of the display.


Referring to FIG. 5, with particular attention to the latching transistors of the pixel electrodes, a black matrix 240 is overlying the latching transistors so that significant ambient light does not strike the transistors. Color filters 242 may be located above the pixel electrodes. Ambient light striking the latching transistors results in draining the charge imposed on the pixel electrodes through the transistor. The discharge of the charge imposed on the pixel electrodes results in a decrease in the operational characteristics of the display, frequently to the extent that the display is rendered effectively inoperative. With the realization that amorphous silicon transistors are sensitive to light incident thereon, the present inventors determined that such transistors within the active matrix layer may be used as a basis upon which to detect the existence of or non-existence of ambient light incident thereon (e.g., relative values thereto).


Referring to FIG. 6, a modified active matrix layer may include a photo-sensitive structure or elements. The preferred photo-sensitive structure includes a photo-sensitive thin film transistor (photo TFT) interconnected to a readout thin film transistor (readout TFT). A capacitor Cst2 may interconnect the common line to the transistors. Referring to FIG. 7, a black matrix may be in an overlying relationship to the readout TFT. The black matrix is preferably an opaque material or otherwise the structure of the display selectively inhibiting the transmission of light to selective portions of the active matrix layer. Preferably the black matrix is completely overlying the amorphous silicon portion of the readout TFT, and at least partially overlying the amorphous silicon portion of the readout TFT. Preferably the black matrix is completely non-overlying the amorphous silicon portion of the photo TFT, and at least partially non-overlying the amorphous silicon portion of the photo TFT. Overlying does not necessarily denote direct contact between the layers, but is intended to denote in the general sense the stacked structure of materials. The black matrix is preferably fabricated on a layer other than the active plate, such as the color plate. The active plate is normally referred to as the plate supporting the thin-film transistors. The location of the black matrix on the color plate (or other non-active plate) results in limited additional processing or otherwise modification of the fabrication of the active matrix. In some embodiments, the black matrix inhibits ambient light from impacting the amorphous silicon portion of the readout TFT to an extent greater than inhibiting ambient light from impacting the amorphous silicon portion of the photo TFT. A gate metal, or other light inhibiting material, may inhibit the photo-sensitive elements from the back light.


Typically the photo-sensitive areas (channels of the transistors) are generally rectangular in shape, although other shapes may be used. The opening in the black matrix is preferably wider (or longer) than the corresponding channel area. In this manner the channel area and the opening in the black matrix are overlapping, with the opening extending in a first dimension (e.g., width) greater than the channel area and in a second dimension (e.g., length) less than the channel area. This alignment alleviates the need for precise registration of the layers while ensuring reasonable optical passage of light to the light sensitive element. Other relative sizes may likewise be used, as described.


As an example, the common line may be set at a negative voltage potential, such as −10 volts. During the previous readout cycle, a voltage is imposed on the select line which causes the voltage on the readout line to be coupled to the drain of the photo TFT and the drain of the readout TFT, which results in a voltage potential across Cst2. The voltage coupled to the drain of the photo TFT and the drain of the readout TFT is approximately ground (e.g., zero volts) with the non-inverting input of the operational amplifier connected to ground. The voltage imposed on the select line is removed so that the readout TFT will turn “off”.


Under normal operational conditions ambient light from the front of the display passes through the black matrix and strikes the amorphous silicon of the photo TFT. However, if a person touches the front of the display in a region over the opening in the black matrix or otherwise inhibits the passage of light through the front of the display in a region over the opening in the black matrix, then the photo TFT transistor will be in an “off” state. If the photo TFT is “off” then the voltage across the capacitor Cst2 will not significantly discharge through the photo TFT. Accordingly, the charge imposed across Cst2 will be substantially unchanged. In essence, the voltage imposed across Cst2 will remain substantially unchanged if the ambient light is inhibited from striking the photo TFT.


To determine the voltage across the capacitor Cst2, a voltage is imposed on the select line which causes the gate of the readout TFT to interconnect the imposed voltage on Cst2 to the readout line. If the voltage imposed on the readout line as a result of activating the readout TFT is substantially unchanged, then the output of the operational amplifier will be substantially unchanged (e.g., zero). In this manner, the system is able to determine whether the light to the device has been inhibited, in which case the system will determine that the screen has been touched at the corresponding portion of the display with the photo TFT.


During the readout cycle, the voltage imposed on the select line causes the voltage on the respective drain of the photo TFT and the drain of the readout TFT to be coupled to the respective readout line, which results in resetting the voltage potential across Cst2. The voltage coupled to the drain of the photo TFT and the drain of the readout TFT is approximately ground (e.g., zero volts) with the non-inverting input of the operational amplifier connected to ground. The voltage imposed on the select line is removed so that the readout TFT will turn “off”. In this manner, the act of reading the voltage simultaneously acts to reset the voltage potential for the next cycle.


Under normal operational conditions ambient light from the front of the display passes through the black matrix and strikes the amorphous silicon of the photo TFT. If a person does not touch the front of the display in a region over the opening in the black matrix or otherwise inhibits the passage of light through the front of the display in a region over the opening in the black matrix, then the photo TFT transistor will be in an “on” state. If the photo TFT is “on” then the voltage across the capacitor Cst2 will significantly discharge through the photo TFT, which is coupled to the common line. In essence the voltage imposed across Cst2 will decrease toward the common voltage. Accordingly, the charge imposed across Cst2 will be substantially changed in the presence of ambient light. Moreover, there is a substantial difference in the voltage potential across the hold capacitor when the light is not inhibited versus when the light is inhibited.


Similarly, to determine the voltage across the capacitor Cst2, a voltage is imposed on the select line which causes the gate of the readout TFT to interconnect the imposed voltage to the readout line. If the voltage imposed on the readout line as a result of activating the readout TFT is substantially changed or otherwise results in an injection of current, then the output of the operational amplifier will be substantially non-zero. The output voltage of the operational amplifier is proportional or otherwise associated with the charge on the capacitor Cst2. In this manner, the system is able to determine whether the light to the device has been uninhibited, in which case the system will determine that the screen has not been touched at the corresponding portion of the display with the photo TFT.


Referring to FIG. 8, a layout of the active matrix layer may include the photo TFT, the capacitor Cst2, and the readout TFT in a region between the pixel electrodes. Light sensitive elements are preferably included at selected intervals within the active matrix layer. In this manner, the device may include touch panel sensitivity without the need for additional touch panel layers attached to the front of the display. In addition, the additional photo TFT, readout TFT, and capacitor may be fabricated together with the remainder of the active matrix layer, without the need for specialized processing. Moreover, the complexity of the fabrication process is only slightly increased so that the resulting manufacturing yield will remain substantially unchanged. It is to be understood that other light sensitive elements may likewise be used. In addition, it is to be understood that other light sensitive electrical architectures may likewise be used.


Referring to FIG. 11, a graph of the photo-currents within amorphous silicon TFTs is illustrated. Line 300 illustrates a dark ambient environment with the gate connected to the source of the photo TFT. It will be noted that the leakage currents are low and relatively stable over a range of voltages. Line 302 illustrates a dark ambient environment with a floating gate of the photo TFT. It will be noted that the leakage currents are generally low and relatively unstable over a range of voltages (significant slope). Line 304 illustrates a low ambient environment with the gate connected to the source of the photo TFT. It will be noted that the leakage currents are three orders of magnitude higher than the corresponding dark ambient conditions and relatively stable over a range of voltages. Line 306 illustrates a low ambient environment with a floating gate of the photo TFT. It will be noted that the leakage currents are generally three orders of magnitude higher and relatively unstable over a range of voltages (significant slope). Line 308 illustrates a high ambient environment with the gate connected to the source of the photo TFT. It will be noted that the leakage currents are 4.5 orders of magnitude higher than the corresponding dark ambient conditions and relatively stable over a range of voltages. Line 310 illustrates a high ambient environment with a floating gate of the photo TFT. It will be noted that the leakage currents are generally 4.5 orders of magnitude higher and relatively unstable over a range of voltages (significant slope). With the significant difference between the dark state, the low ambient state, and the high ambient state, together with the substantially flat responses over a voltage range (source-drain voltage), the system may readily process the data in a confident manner, especially with the gate connected to the source. In general, the architecture preferably permits the leakage currents to be within one order of magnitude over the central 50%, more preferably over the central 75%, of the voltage range used for displaying images.


Referring to FIG. 9, under high ambient lighting conditions the photo TFT will tend to completely discharge the Cst2 capacitor to the common voltage, perhaps with an offset voltage because of the photo TFT. In this manner, all of the photo TFTs across the display will tend to discharge to the same voltage level. Those regions with reduced ambient lighting conditions or otherwise where the user blocks ambient light from reaching the display, the Cst2 capacitor will not fully discharge, as illustrated by the downward spike in the graph. The downward spike in the graph provides location information related to the region of the display that has been touched.


Referring to FIG. 10, under lower ambient lighting conditions the photo TFT will tend to partially discharge the Cst2 capacitor to the common voltage. In this manner, all of the photo TFTs across the display will tend to discharge to some intermediate voltage levels. Those regions with further reduced ambient lighting conditions or otherwise where the user blocks ambient light from reaching the display, the Cst2 capacitor will discharge to a significantly less extent, as illustrated by the downward spike in the graph. The downward spike in the graph provides location information related to the region of the display that has been touched. As shown in FIGS. 9 and 10, the region or regions where the user inhibits light from reaching the display may be determined as localized minimums. In other embodiments, depending on the circuit topology, the location(s) where the user inhibits light from reaching the display may be determined as localized maximums or otherwise some measure from the additional components.


In the circuit topology illustrated, the value of the capacitor Cst2 may be selected such that it is suitable for high ambient lighting conditions or low ambient lighting conditions. For low ambient lighting conditions, a smaller capacitance may be selected so that the device is more sensitive to changes in light. For high ambient lighting conditions, a larger capacitance may be selected so that the device is less sensitive to changes in light. In addition, the dimensions of the phototransistor may be selected to change the photo-leakage current. Also, one set of light sensitive elements (e.g., the photo TFT and the capacitance) within the display may be optimized for low ambient lighting conditions while another set of light sensitive elements (e.g., the photo TFT and the capacitance) within the display may be optimized for high ambient lighting conditions. Typically, the data from light sensitive elements for low ambient conditions and the data from light sensitive elements for high ambient conditions are separately processed, and the suitable set of data is selected. In this manner, the same display device may be used for high and low ambient lighting conditions. In addition, multiple levels of sensitivity may be provided. It is to be understood that a single architecture may be provided with a wide range of sensitivity from low to high ambient lighting conditions. In addition, any suitable alternative architecture may be used for sensing the decrease and/or increase in ambient light.


Another structure that may be included is selecting the value of the capacitance so that under normal ambient lighting conditions the charge on the capacitor only partially discharges. With a structure where the capacitive charge only partially discharges, the present inventors determined that an optical pointing device, such as a light wand or laser pointer, might be used to point at the display to further discharge particular regions of the display. In this manner, the region of the display that the optical pointing device remains pointed at may be detected as local maximums (or otherwise). In addition, those regions of the display where light is inhibited will appear as local minimums (or otherwise). This provides the capability of detecting not only the absence of light (e.g., touching the panel) but likewise those regions of the display that have increased light incident thereon. Referring to FIG. 12, a graph illustrates local minimums (upward peaks) from added light and local maximums (downward peaks) from a lack of light. In addition, one set of light sensitive elements (e.g., the photo TFT and the capacitance) within the display may be optimized for ambient lighting conditions to detect the absence of light while another set of light sensitive elements (e.g., the photo TFT and the capacitance) within the display may be optimized for ambient lighting conditions to detect the additional light imposed thereon.


A switch associated with the display, as illustrated in FIG. 15, may be provided to select among a plurality of different sets of light sensitive elements. For example, one of the switches may select between low, medium, and high ambient lighting conditions. For example, another switch may select between a touch sensitive operation (absence of light) and an optical pointing device (addition of light). In addition, the optical pointing device may communicate to the display, such as through a wire or wireless connection, to automatically change to the optical sensing mode. A light sensor (external photo-sensor to the light sensitive elements in the active layer as illustrated in FIG. 15) and/or one or more of the light sensitive elements may be used to sense the ambient lighting conditions for selecting among different sets of light sensitive elements. Also the sensor and/or one or more light sensitive elements may be used to select, (1) to sense the absence of light, (2) select to sense the addition of light, and/or (3) adjust the sensing levels of the electronics.


In some embodiments the corresponding color filters for (e.g., above) some or all of the light sensitive elements may be omitted or replaced by a clear (or substantially clear) material. In this manner the light reaching some of the light sensitive elements will not be filtered by a color filter as illustrated in FIG. 26. This permits those light sensitive elements to sense a greater dynamic range or a different part of the dynamic range than those receiving filtered light.


It is noted that the teachings herein are likewise applicable to transmissive active matrix liquid crystal devices, reflective active matrix liquid crystal devices, transflective active matrix liquid crystal devices, etc. In addition, the light sensitive elements may likewise be provided within a passive liquid crystal display. The sensing devices may be, for example, photo resistors and photo diodes.


Alternatively, light sensitive elements may be provided between the rear polarizing element and the active matrix layer. In this arrangement, the light sensitive elements are preferably fabricated on the polarizer, or otherwise a film attached to the polarizer. In addition, the light sensitive elements may be provided on a thin glass plate between the polarizer and the liquid crystal material. In addition, the black matrix or otherwise light inhibiting material is preferably arranged so as to inhibit ambient light from striking the readout TFT while free from inhibiting light from striking the photo TFT. Moreover, preferably a light blocking material is provided between the photo TFT and/or the readout TFT and the backlight, such as gate metal, if provided, to inhibit the light from the backlight from reaching the photo TFT and/or the readout TFT.


Alternatively, light sensitive elements may be provided between the front polarizing element and the liquid crystal material. In this arrangement, the light sensitive elements are preferably fabricated on the polarizer, or otherwise a film attached to the polarizer. In addition, the light sensitive elements may be provided on a thin glass plate between the polarizer and the liquid crystal material. The light sensitive elements may likewise be fabricated within the front electrode layer by patterning the front electrode layer and including suitable fabrication techniques. In addition, a black matrix or otherwise light inhibiting material is preferably arranged so as to inhibit ambient light from striking the readout TFT while free from inhibiting light from striking the photo TFT. Moreover, preferably a light blocking material is provided between the photo TFT and/or the readout TFT and the backlight, if provided, to inhibit the light from the backlight from reaching the photo TFT and/or the readout TFT.


Alternatively, light sensitive elements may be provided between the front of the display and the rear of the display, normally fabricated on one of the layers therein or fabricated on a separate layer provided within the stack of layers within the display. In the case of a liquid crystal device with a backlight the light sensitive elements are preferably provided between the front of the display and the backlight material. The position of the light sensitive elements are preferably between (or at least partially) the pixel electrodes, when viewed from a plan view of the display. This may be particularly useful for reflective displays where the pixel electrodes are opaque. In addition for reflective displays, any reflective conductive electrodes should be arranged so that they do not significantly inhibit light from reaching the light sensitive elements. In this arrangement, the light sensitive elements are preferably fabricated on one or more of the layers, or otherwise a plate attached to one or more of the layers. In addition, a black matrix or otherwise light inhibiting material is preferably arranged so as to inhibit ambient light from striking the readout TFT while free from inhibiting light from striking the photo TFT. Moreover, preferably a light blocking material is provided between the photo TFT and/or the readout TFT and the backlight, if provided, to inhibit the light from the backlight from reaching the photo TFT and/or the readout TFT.


In many applications it is desirable to modify the intensity of the backlight for different lighting conditions. For example, in dark ambient lighting conditions it may be beneficial to have a dim backlight. In contrast, in bright ambient lighting conditions it may be beneficial to have a bright backlight. The integrated light sensitive elements within the display stack may be used as a measure of the ambient lighting conditions to control the intensity of the backlight without the need for an additional external photo-sensor. One light sensitive element may be used, or a plurality of light sensitive element may be used together with additional processing, such as averaging.


In one embodiment, the readout line may be included in a periodic manner within the display sufficient to generally identify the location of the “touch”. For example the readout line may be periodically added at each 30th column. Spacing the readout lines at a significant number of pixels apart results in a display that nearly maintains its previous brightness because most of the pixel electrodes have an unchanged size. However, after considerable testing it was determined that such periodic spacing results in a noticeable non-uniform gray scale because of differences in the size of the active region of the pixel electrodes. One potential resolution of the non-uniform gray scale is to modify the frame data in a manner consistent with the non-uniformity, such as increasing the gray level of the pixel electrodes with a reduced size or otherwise reducing the gray levels of the non-reduced size pixel electrodes, or a combination thereof. While a potential resolution, this requires additional data processing which increases the computational complexity of the system.


A more desirable resolution of the non-uniform gray scale is to modify the display to include a readout line at every third pixel, or otherwise in a manner consistent with the pixel electrode pattern of the display (red pixel, green pixel, blue pixel). Alternatively, a readout line is included at least every 12th pixel (36 pixel electrodes of a red, blue, green arrangement), more preferably at least every 9th pixel (27 pixel electrodes of a red, blue, green arrangement), even more preferably at least every 6th pixel (18 pixel electrodes of a red, blue, green arrangement or 24 pixel electrodes of a red, blue, green arrangement), and most preferably at least every 3rd pixel (3 pixel electrodes of a red, blue, green arrangement). The readout lines are preferably included for at least a pattern of four times the spacing between readout lines (e.g., 12th pixel times 4 equals 48 pixels, 9th pixel times 4 equals 36 pixels). More preferably the pattern of readout lines is included over a majority of the display. The resulting display may include more readout lines than are necessary to accurately determine the location of the “touch”. To reduce the computational complexity of the display, a selection of the readout lines may be free from interconnection or otherwise not operationally interconnected with readout electronics. In addition, to further reduce the computational complexity of the display and to increase the size of the pixel electrodes, the readout lines not operationally interconnected with readout electronics may likewise be free from an associated light sensitive element. In other words, additional non-operational readout lines may be included within the display to provide a gray scale display with increased uniformity. In an alternative embodiment, one or more of the non-operational readout lines may be replaced with spaces. In this manner, the gray scale display may include increased uniformity, albeit with additional spaces within the pixel electrode matrix.


The present inventors considered the selection of potential pixel electrodes and came to the realization that the electrode corresponding to “blue” light does not contribute to the overall white transmission to the extent that the “green” or “red” electrodes. Accordingly, the system may be designed in such a manner that the light sensitive elements are associated with the “blue” electrodes to an extent greater than their association with the “green” or “red” electrodes. In this manner, the “blue” pixel electrodes may be decreased in size to accommodate the light sensitive elements while the white transmission remains substantially unchanged. Experiments have shown that reducing the size of the “blue” electrodes to approximately 85% of their original size, with the “green” and “red” electrodes remaining unchanged, results in a reduction in the white transmission by only about 3 percent.


While such an additional set of non-operational readout lines provides for increased uniform gray levels, the reduction of pixel apertures results in a reduction of brightness normally by at least 5 percent and possibly as much as 15 percent depending on the resolution and layout design rules employed. In addition, the manufacturing yield is decreased because the readout line has a tendency to short to its neighboring data line if the processing characteristics are not accurately controlled. For example, the data line and readout line may be approximately 6-10 microns apart along a majority of their length.


Referring to FIG. 13, to increase the potential manufacturing yield and the brightness of the display, the present inventors came to the realization that the readout of the photo-sensitive circuit and the writing of data to the pixels may be combined on the same bus line, or otherwise a set of lines that are electrically interconnected to one another. To facilitate the use of the same bus line, a switch 418 may select between providing new data 420 to the selected pixels and reading data 414 from the selected pixels. With the switch 418 set to interconnect the new data 420 with the selected pixels, the data from a frame buffer or otherwise the video data stream may be provided to the pixels associated with one of the select lines. Multiple readout circuits may be used, or one or more multiplexed readout circuits may be used. For example, the new data 420 provided on data line 400 may be 4.5 volts which is latched to the pixel electrode 402 and the photo TFT 404 by imposing a suitable voltage on the select line 406. In this manner, the data voltage is latched to both the pixel electrode and a corresponding photo-sensitive circuit.


The display is illuminated in a traditional manner and the voltage imposed on the photo TFT 404 may be modified in accordance with the light incident on the photo-sensitive circuit, as previously described. In the topology illustrated, the photo TFT 404 is normally a N-type transistor which is reverse biased by setting the voltage on the common line 408 to a voltage lower than an anticipated voltage on the photo TFT 404, such as −10 or −15 volts. The data for the current frame may be stored in a frame buffer for later usage. Prior to writing the data for another frame, such as the next frame, the data (e.g., voltage) on the readout TFT 410 is read out. The switch 418 changes between the new data 420 to the readout line 414 interconnected to the charge readout amplifier 412. The select line 406 is again selected to couple the remaining voltage on the photo TFT 404 through the readout TFT 410 to the data line 400. The coupled voltage (or current) to the data line 400 is provided as an input to the charge readout amplifier 412 which is compared against the corresponding data from the previous frame 422, namely, the voltage originally imposed on the photo TFT 404. The difference between the readout line 414 and the data from the previous frame 422 provides an output to the amplifier 412. The output of the amplifier 412 is provided to the processor. The greater the drain of the photo TFT 404, normally as a result of sensing light, results in a greater output of the amplifier 412. Referring to FIG. 14, an exemplary timing for the writing and readout on the shared data line 400 is illustrated.


At low ambient lighting conditions and at dark lighting conditions, the integrated optical touch panel is not expected to operate well to the touch of the finger because there will be an insufficient (or none) difference between the signals from the surrounding area and the touched area. To alleviate the inability to effectively sense at the low and dark ambient lighting conditions a light pen or laser pointer may be used (e.g., light source), as previously described. The light source may be operably interconnected to the display such as by a wire or wireless communication link. With the light source operably interconnected to the display the intensity of the light source may be controlled, at least in part, by feedback from the photo-sensitive elements or otherwise the display, as illustrated in FIG. 15. When the display determines that sufficient ambient light exists, such as ambient light exceeding a threshold value, the light source is turned “off”. In this manner, touching the light source against the display results in the same effect as touching a finger against the display, namely, impeding ambient light from striking the display. When the display determines that insufficient ambient light exists, such as ambient light failing to exceed a threshold value, the light source is turned “on”. In this manner, touching or otherwise directing the light from the light source against the display results in a localized increase in the received light relative to the ambient light level. This permits the display to be operated in dark ambient lighting conditions or by feedback from the display. In addition, the intensity of the light from the light source may be varied, such as step-wise, linearly, non-linearly, or continuously, depending upon the ambient lighting conditions. Alternatively, the light source may include its own ambient light detector so that feedback from the display is unnecessary and likewise communication between the light source and the display may be unnecessary.


While using light from an external light source, while beneficial, it may still be difficult to accurately detect the location of the additional light because of background noise within the system and variable lighting conditions. The present inventors considered this situation and determined that by providing light during different frames, such as odd frames or even frames, or odd fields or even fields, or every third frame, or during selected frames, a more defined differential signal between the frames indicates the “touch” location. In essence, the light may be turned on and off in some manner, such as blinking at a rate synchronized with the display line scanning or frames. An exemplary timing for an odd/even frame arrangement is shown in FIG. 16. In addition, the illumination of some types of displays involves scanning the display in a row-by-row manner. In such a case, the differential signal may be improved by modifying the timing of the light pulses in accordance with the timing of the gate pulse (e.g., scanning) for the respective pixel electrodes. For example, in a top-down scanning display the light pulse should be earlier when the light source is directed toward the top of the display as opposed to the bottom of the display. The synchronization may be based upon feedback from the display, if desired.


In one embodiment, the light source may blink at a rate synchronized with the display line scanning. For example, the light source may use the same driver source as the image pixel electrodes. In another embodiment the use of sequential (or otherwise) frames may be subtracted from one another which results in significant difference between signal and ambient conditions. Preferably, the light sensitive elements have a dynamic range greater than 2 decades, and more preferably a dynamic range greater than 4 decades. If desired, the system may use two sequential fields of scanning (all lines) subtracted from the next two fields of scanning (all lines) so that all the lines of the display are used.


Another technique for effective operation of the display in dark or low level ambient conditions is using a pen or other device with a light reflecting surface that is proximate (touching or near touching) the display when interacting with the display. The light from the backlight transmitted through the panel is then reflected back into the photo-sensitive element and the readout signal will be greater at the touch location than the surrounding area.


Referring to FIG. 17, another type of reflective liquid crystal display, typically used on handheld computing devices, involves incorporating a light guide in front of the liquid crystal material, which is normally a glass plate or clear plastic material. Normally, the light guide is constructed from an opaque material having an index of refraction between 1.4 and 1.6, more typically between 1.45 and 1.50, and sometimes of materials having an index of refraction of 1.46. The light guide may further include anti-glare and anti-reflection coatings. The light guide is frequently illuminated with a light source, frequently disposed to the side of the light guide. The light source may be any suitable device, such as for example, a cold cathode fluorescent lamp, an incandescent lamp, and a light emitting diode. To improve the light collection a reflector may be included behind the lamp to reflect light that is emitted away from the light guide, and to re-direct the light into the light guide. The light propagating within the light guide bounces between the two surfaces by total internal reflections. The total internal reflections will occur for angles that are above the critical angle, measured relative to the normal to the surfaces, as illustrated in FIG. 18. To a first order approximation, the critical angle custom character may be defined by Sin(custom character)=1/n where n is the index of refraction of the light guide. Since the surfaces of the light guide are not perfectly smooth there will be some dispersion of the light, which causes some illumination of the display, as shown in FIG. 19.


The present inventors came to the realization that the critical angle and the disruption of the total internal reflections may be modified in such a manner as to provide a localized increase in the diffusion of light. Referring to FIG. 20, one suitable technique for the localized diffusion of light involves using a plastic pen to touch the front of the display. The internally reflected light coincident with the location that the pen touches the display will significantly diffuse and be directed toward the photo sensitive elements within the display. The plastic pen, or other object including the finger or the eraser of a pencil, preferably has an index of refraction within 0.5, more preferably within 0.25, of the index of refraction of the light guide. For example, the index of refraction of the light guide may be between 1.2 and 1.9, and more preferably between 1.4 and 1.6. With the two indexes of refraction sufficiently close to one another the disruption of the internal reflections, and hence amount of light directed toward the photo-sensitive elements, is increased. In addition, the plastic pen preferably has sufficient reflectivity of light as opposed to being non-reflective material, such as for example, black felt.


Referring to FIG. 21, after further consideration the present inventors were surprised to note that a white eraser a few millimeters away from the light guide results in a darkened region with generally consistent optical properties while a white eraser in contact with the light guide results in a darkened region with generally consistent optical properties together with a smaller illuminated region. In the preferred embodiment, the light sensitive elements are positioned toward the front of the display in relation to the liquid crystal material (or otherwise the light valve or electroluminescent material) so that a clearer image may be obtained. It is to be understood that any suitable pointing device may be used. The illuminated region has an illumination brighter in relation to the remainder of the darkened region. The illuminated region may be located by any suitable technique, such as for example, a center of gravity technique.


In some cases the display screen will have a relatively light colored region, such as white or tan, which is used as a virtual button for operating software. Within this light colored region is typically textual information in relatively dark letters. In liquid crystal display technology the light colored region is indicative of light passing through the liquid crystal material. Accordingly, if a pointing instrument includes a generally reflective material the light passing through the display may be reflected back through the display. The light reflected back through the display may be sensed by the light sensitive elements.


After further consideration of the illuminated region the present inventors came to the realization that when users use a “touch panel” display, there is a likelihood that the pointing device (or finger) may “hover” at a location above the display. Normally, during this hovering the user is not actually selecting any portion of the display, but rather still deciding where to select. In this manner, the illuminated region is beneficial because it provides a technique for the determination between when the user is simply “hovering” and the user has actually touched (e.g., “touching”) the display.


In part, the sensitivity to hovering may be related to the light sensitive elements being primarily sensitive to collimated light which is inhibited by the finger or other element in proximity to the device because of the alignment of the opening in the black matrix to the pixel electrodes. To reduce the dependency to collimated light the black matrix may include central material aligned with the respective pixel electrodes so that the light sensitive elements have an increased sensitivity to non-collimated light (or otherwise non-perpendicular or otherwise angled incident light), as illustrated in FIG. 22. In some embodiments, the openings may be considered a non-continuous opening or otherwise the spatial opening for a particular pixel is noncontinuous.


Another potential technique for the determination between “hovering” and “touching” is to temporally model the “shadow” region (e.g., light impeded region of the display). In one embodiment, when the user is typically touching the display then the end of the shadow will typically remain stationary for a period of time, which may be used as a basis, at least in part, of “touching”. In another embodiment, the shadow will typically enlarge as the pointing device approaches the display and shrinks as the pointing device recedes from the display, where the general time between enlarging and receding may be used as a basis, at least in part, of “touching”. In another embodiment, the shadow will typically enlarge as the pointing device approaches the display and maintain the same general size when the pointing device is touching the display, where the general time where the shadow maintains the same size may be used as a basis, at least in part, of “touching”. In another embodiment, the shadow will typically darken as the pointing device approaches the display and maintain the same shade when the pointing device is touching the display, where the general time where the shadow maintains the same general shade may be used as a basis, at least in part, of “touching”.


To further distinguish between the finger or other devices being close to the display (or touching) or alternatively being spaced sufficiently apart from the display, a light directing structure may be used. One such light directing structure is shown in FIG. 23. The light directing structure is preferably included around a portion of the periphery of the display and may reflect ambient light across the frontal region of the display. The reflected light then reflects off the finger or other device thus increasing the light striking the light sensitive element when the finger or other device is spaced sufficiently apart from the display. The light reflecting off the finger or other device decreases when the finger or other device is near the display because of the angular reflections of light. The differences in the reflected light striking the display may be used, at least in part, to detect the touching of the display or otherwise inhibiting light to the display.


While attempting to consider implementation of such techniques on a handheld device it came to the inventor's surprise that the display portion of a handheld device has a refresh rate generally less than the refresh rate of the portion of the handwriting recognition portion of the display. The handheld portion of the display may use any recognition technique, such as Palm OS® based devices. The refresh rate of the display is typically generally 60 hertz while the refresh rate of the handwriting portion of the display is typically generally 100 hertz. Accordingly, the light-sensitive elements should be sampled at a sampling rate corresponding with the refresh rate of the respective portion of the display.


The technique described with respect to FIG. 20 operates reasonably well in dark ambient lighting conditions, low ambient lighting conditions, regular ambient lighting conditions, and high ambient lighting conditions. During regular and high ambient lighting conditions, the display is alleviated of a dependency on the ambient lighting conditions. In addition, with such lighting the illumination point is more pronounced and thus easier to extract. Unfortunately, during the daytime the ambient light may be sufficiently high causing the detection of the pointing device to be difficult. In addition, shades of the ambient light may also interfere with the detection techniques.


The present inventors considered improving the robustness of the detection techniques but came to the realization that with sufficient “noise” in the system the creation of such sufficiently robust techniques would be difficult. As opposed to the traditional approach of improving the detection techniques, the present inventors came to the realization that by providing light to the light guide of a limited selection of wavelengths and selectively filtering the wavelengths of light within the display the difference between touched and un-touched may be increased. As an initial matter the light from the light source provided to the light guide is modified, or otherwise filtered, to provide a single color. Alternatively, the light source may provide light of a range of wavelengths, such as 600-700 nm, or 400-500 and 530-580, or 630. Typically, the light provided to the light guide has a range of wavelengths (in any significant amount) less than white light or otherwise the range of wavelengths of ambient light. Accordingly, with the light provided to the light guide having a limited color gamut (or reduced color spectrum) the touching of the pointing device on the display results in the limited color gamut light being locally directed toward the light-sensitive elements. With a limited color gamut light being directed toward the display as a result of touching the light guide (or otherwise touching the front of the display), a color filter may be included between the light guide and the light-sensitive elements to filter out at least a portion of the light not included within the limited color gamut. In other words, the color filter reduces the transmission of ambient light to an extent greater than the transmission of light from the light source or otherwise within the light guide. For example, the ambient light may be considered as “white” light while the light guide has primarily “red” light therein. A typical transmission of a red color filter for ambient white light may be around 20%, while the same color filter will transmit about 85% of the red light. Preferably the transmission of ambient light through the color filter is less than 75% (greater than 25% attenuation) (or 60%, 50%, 40%, 30%) while the transmission of the respective light within the light guide is greater than 25% (less than 25% attenuation) (or 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%), so that in this manner there is sufficient attenuation of selected wavelengths of the ambient light with respect to the wavelengths of light within the light guide to increase the ability to accurately detect the touching.


In another embodiment, the light source to the light guide may include a switch or otherwise automatic modification to “white” light when operated in low ambient lighting conditions. In this manner, the display may be more effectively viewed at low ambient lighting conditions.


In another embodiment, the present inventors determined that if the light source providing light to the display was modulated in some fashion an improvement in signal detection may be achieved. For example, a pointing device with a light source associated therewith may modulate the light source in accordance with the frame rate of the display. With a frame rate of 60 hertz the pointing device may for example modulate the light source at a rate of 30 hertz, 20 hertz, 10 hertz, etc. which results in additional light periodically being sensed by the light sensitive elements. Preferably, the light source is modulated (“blinked”) at a rate synchronized with the display line scanning, and uses the same raw drivers as the image thin-film transistors. The resulting data may be processed in a variety of different ways.


In one embodiment, the signals from the light sensitive elements are used, as captured. The resulting improvement in signal to background ratio is related to the pulse length of the light relative to the frame time. This provides some additional improvement in signal detection between the light generated by the pointing device relative to the ambient light (which is constant in time).


In another embodiment, multiple frames are compared against one another to detect the presence and absence of the additional light resulting from the modulation. In the case of subsequent frames (sequential or non-sequential), one without additional light and one with additional light, the data from the light sensitive elements may be subtracted from one another. The improvement in signal to background ratio is related to the periodic absence of the additional light. In addition, this processing technique is especially suitable for low ambient lighting and high ambient lighting conditions. Preferably the dynamic range of the sensors is at least 4 decades, and two sequential frames with additional light and two sequential frames without additional light are used so that all of the scanning lines are encompassed. When the system charges a sensor it takes a whole frame for it to discharge by the light. Since the first line will start at time zero and take a frame time, the last line will be charged after almost a frame and will take another frame time to discharge. Therefore, the system should preferably use two frames with additional illumination and then two frames without additional illumination.


While the light sensitive elements may be used to determine “touch” and the location of the “touch”, it is sometimes problematic to distinguish between “hovering” and “touch”. To assist in the determination of actual touching of the display a pressure based mechanism may be used. One pressure based mechanism may include pressure sensitive tape between a pair of layers of the display or between the display and a support for the display. Another pressure based mechanism may include an electrical or magnetic sensor operably connected to the display. In either case, the pressure based mechanism provides a signal to the display electronics indicating the sensing of pressure (e.g., touch) or alternatively the absence of pressure (e.g., non-touch).


Referring to FIG. 24, one configuration of an elongate light emitting device includes an infra-red light emitting diode that periodically or continuously emits an infra-red beam. The infra-red beam is transmitted from the light emitting device and reflects off the display. When the light pen is spaced sufficiently far from the display the reflected infra-red beam will not strike the light pen. When the light pen is spaced sufficiently close to the display the reflected infra-red beam will strike the light pen and is sensed by an infra-red sensor within the light pen. Infra-red light is preferred, while any suitable wavelength may be used that the light sensitive elements of the display are generally insensitive to. When the infra-red sensor senses the reflected infra-red light the visible light emitting diode is turned on to illuminate the pixel. The visible light emitting diode preferably provides a wavelength that the light sensitive elements of the display are sensitive to. After a predetermined duration or otherwise while the infra-red light is not being sensed by the infra-red sensor the visible light emitting diode is turned off. In this manner, battery power within the light pen is conserved. In addition, the edge or shape of the visible light from the visible light emitting diode may be used to determine the spacing between the light pen and the display. Also, the beam from the visible light emitting diode may be varied based upon the signal sensed by the infra-red sensor.


Upon reconsidering the display with a light guide, as illustrated in FIG. 17, the present inventors realized that those portions of the light guide that are in contact with the high portion of the user's fingerprints will tend to diffuse and scatter light toward the light sensitive elements, as illustrated in FIG. 25. Those portions of the light guide that are not in contact with the high portion of the user's fingerprints (i.e., valleys) will not tend to diffuse and scatter light toward the light sensitive elements. Depending on the thickness of the light guide and liquid crystal material together with the density of the light sensitive elements, the details observable in the fingerprint will vary. To increase the ability to detect the fingerprint, the display may be designed with multiple densities of light sensitive elements. For example, in the region where the fingerprint is normally located the density of the light sensitive elements may be increased such as including a light sensitive element at every sub-pixel. In this manner, the display includes multiple densities of light sensitive elements. Moreover, the display may likewise be used for sensing other items, such as for example, bar codes.


In some cases there may be excessive parallax which causes a smeared image to be detected. In addition, oil and sweat on the fingers may tend to reduce the contrast between the high and low point of the user's fingerprint. Referring to FIG. 26, a separate sensor structure may be included within the display. The sensor structure may include a lens between the light guide and the light sensitive elements. The lens may be any suitable lens structure, such as for example, a small focus lens or a SELFOC lens (variable index of refraction fiber optics). The color filters in the fingerprint sensing region may be omitted, if desired.


To increase the ability of the light sensitive elements to detect the details that may be present within a fingerprint it is desirable to have a greater density of light sensitive elements in the region where the fingerprint is to be sensed. In this manner the display may include two (or more) different densities of light sensitive elements across the display. Alternatively, the light guide and lens may be omitted and a high density of light sensitive elements included for fingerprint sensing. It is to be understood that other items may likewise be sensed with the high density light sensitive elements.


The light sensitive elements will tend to observe very high ambient lighting conditions when the finger is not present rendering their ability to detect high contrast images difficult. To increase the effective sensitivity of the light sensitive elements a color filter may be provided in an overlying relationship to the light sensitive elements. In addition, the light source may be selected in relation to the color filter. For example, a blue filter may be used together with a blue light source. In addition, the illumination may be modulated and synchronized with the sensors. In this case, the light source may be illuminated with relatively short pulses together with the triggering of the sensing by the light sensitive elements. In the case where the light is pulsed in relation to the frame rate it is preferably pulsed at half the frame rate. In this manner the light pulses will be ensured to be sensed during different frames. Also, a light inhibiting material may closely surround the region where the finger is located to reduce stray ambient light, thus increasing contrast.


For the detection of fingerprints, sweat and oil from the fingers may impact the ability to accurately sense the fingerprint. Sweat is primarily water with an index of refraction of approximately 1.3. Typical glass has an index of refraction of approximately 1.5 which is sufficiently different than 1.3, and accordingly sweat will not significantly negatively impact image sensing. However, oils have an index of refraction of approximately 1.44 to 1.47 which is considerably closer to 1.5, and accordingly oil will tend to significantly impact image sensing. In order to improve the contrast, hence image sensing, the glass may be replaced with glass having a higher index of refraction or glass coated with a material having a higher index of refraction, such as for example, 1.55 or more.


Attempting to record signatures may be problematic with many touch sensitive displays because the response time of the recording system is inadequate or otherwise the software has a slow sampling rate. However, the user normally prefers immediate feedback. Referring to FIG. 27 the display may include a signature portion that includes a memory maintaining material. The memory maintaining material may sense the writing of the signature, such as by pressure exerted thereon or light sensitive material. For example, the memory material may be a pair of flexible layers with fluid there between that is displaced while writing the signature. After writing the name the user may press a button or otherwise touch another portion of the display indicating that the signature is completed. Alternatively, the display may sense the signature by a sufficient change in the optical properties of the memory maintaining material. The display may then capture an image of the signature. For example, the image of the signature may come from ambient light passing through the memory maintaining material or otherwise from light reflected off the memory maintaining material, especially when the display is in transmissive (“white”) mode. The signature may be cleared in any manner, such as electrical erasure or physical erasure by any suitable mechanism. In this manner, the temporal limitations of writing a signature are reduced.


Alternatively the display may include a signature mode that captures the user's signature over several frames. The signature may be captured on a predetermined region of the display or otherwise any portion of the display. The system detects the decrease in ambient light over a series of frames as the signature is written. In this manner the “path” of the signature may be determined and thereafter used in any suitable manner.


In many cases the user desires the tactile response of pen pressure against the display. In this manner, the user has greater comfort with the pen and display for writing, drawing, or otherwise indicating a response. Referring to FIG. 28, the pen may include a movable optical path (e.g., a fiber optic bundle) with respect to the pen that extends and retracts based upon pressure exerted on the display. A light emitting diode provides a beam of light that is channeled through the optical path. As it may be observed, when the optical path is in a retracted state that more light passes through the optical path than when the optical path is in an extended state. In this manner, the light sensitive elements may detect the intensity of the transmitted light and determine the pressure that is being exerted against the display by the user. This capability is particularly useful for pressure sensitive applications, such as Photoshop by Adobe.


Referring to FIG. 29 another pen pressure embodiment is illustrated. A cylindrical tubular tip portion is movable with respect to the pen that extends and retracts based upon pressure exerted on the display. Within the cylindrical tubular tip portion is a lens. The lens focuses the light emitted from a light emitting diode, which preferably is maintained stationary with respect to the pen and/or moves with respect to the cylindrical tubular tip portion. Alternatively, the light emitting diode may be connected to the tip portion of the pen. As it may be observed, when the cylindrical tubular tip portion is in a retracted state light may be more focused on the display (light sensitive elements) than when the cylindrical tubular tip portion is in an extended state. The lens may be modified so that it operates in a reversed manner. The focus of the beam may be detected in any suitable manner by the light sensitive elements (e.g., size and/or intensity) to determine the pressure that is being exerted against the display by the user.


Referring to FIG. 30 another pen pressure embodiment is illustrated. A cylindrical tubular tip portion or optical light guide is movable with respect to the pen that extends and retracts based upon pressure exerted on the display. As the cylindrical tubular tip portion moves with respect to the pen the resistance of a variable resistive element changes. The variable resistive element is interconnected to a light emitting diode which changes intensity based upon the change in the variable resistance. The intensity of light sensed by the light sensitive elements, or otherwise the change in intensity sensed by the light sensitive elements, may be used to determine the pressure that is being exerted against the display by the user.


Referring to FIG. 31 another pen pressure embodiment is illustrated. An optional lens focuses a beam from a light emitting diode. When the pen is farther from the display a larger spot size and/or intensity is sensed by the light sensitive elements with respect to when the pen is closer to the display. The intensity of the light and/or the size of the spot sensed by the light sensitive elements or otherwise the change in intensity and/or size may be used to determine the pressure that is being exerted against the display by the user.


Referring to FIG. 32, a modified light guide type structure is shown. A polarizer may be included on the lower surface of the light guide. In addition, other polarizers may be included on the front and rear surfaces of the liquid crystal display. The polarizer on the lower surface of the light guide preferably matches (±5 degrees, ±2 degrees) the orientation of the polarizer on the front surface of the liquid crystal display. The polarizers may include anti-reflection coatings if desired. With the top two polarizers being included together with proper alignment between them more of the light from the pen will tend to pass through to the liquid crystal display.


Referring to FIG. 33 an exemplary image processing technique is illustrated for processing the data from the display to determine the location of the touch. The display is initially calibrated by a calibration image module. For calibration, an image is obtained with the display covered by a black cloth or otherwise blocked from receiving ambient light. The black reference image may be referred to as I0. Then an image may be obtained under normal uniform (e.g., without significant shadows or light spots) ambient lighting conditions and referred to as I1. A comparison between I0 and I1 may be performed to calibrate the display.


During operation, the image is initially captured by a capture image module. For example, a 60×60 sensor matrix may be captured. Optionally a set of consecutive frames may then be averaged by an average frame module in order to reduce the noise in the signal, such as for example four frames.


An AGC module may perform an automatic gain control function in order to adjust for an offset in the value. One particular implementation may be described by the following equation: Ie={(Is−I0)/(I1−I0)}. Ie is the signal after equalization. “Is” is the sensor signal as captured or after averaging. I0 is the stored sensor reading for the black reference image. I1 is the stored sensor reading for the bright (e.g., ambient lighting conditions) reference image. The equalization module uses I0 to adjust for the potential non-zero value at dark conditions. In particular, this adjustment is made by the calculation of Is−I0. The resulting comparison (e.g., division) of the captured signal versus the stored bright reference signals adjusts the level of the signal. Moreover, the output of the equalization is a normalized signal with a range from 0 to 1 in the case that Is<I1. Ie may then be used to adjust the gain of the output of the average frame module or captured image value. The AGC module thus effectively corrects for dark level non-uniformity and for sensor gain non-uniformity.


A smoothing module may be used to average proximate values together to compensate for non-uniformity in the characteristics of the display. A suitable filter is an averaging of the 8 adjacent pixels to a central pixel. Inherently the system provides relatively sharp edges from the signals which may be used directly. However, with the capability in some embodiments of detecting positive and negative outputs it was determined that using an edge detection module is beneficial. A preferred edge detection technique uses a 3×3 matrix, such as for example: {(-1-1-1) (-1-8-1) (-1-1-1)}. The effect of the edge detection module is to enhance or otherwise determine those regions of the image that indicate an edge. Other edge detection techniques may likewise be used, such as for example, a Sobel edge detection technique, a 1st derivative technique, and a Robert's cross technique.


A threshold module may be used to set all values below a predetermined threshold value to zero, or otherwise indicate that they are not edges or regions being touched. In the case that the system provides negative values the predetermined threshold value may be less than an absolute value. The use of threshold values assists in the discrimination between the end of the finger touching the display and the shade from the hand itself. If there are an insufficient number of pixels as a result of the threshold module that are non-thresholded then the system returns to the start.


If there are a sufficient number of pixels as a result of the threshold module that are non-thresholded then the system determines the largest region of non-thresholded values using a max location module. In this manner, smaller regions of a few values may be removed so that the predominant region of non-thresholded values may be determined. A center of gravity module may be used to determine the center of the maximum region from the max location module. An x-y coordinates module may be used to provide the x and y display coordinates and a plot cross module may be used to display a cross on the display at the x-y coordinates of the center of gravity. The cross module may provide data regarding the existence of the “touch” and its location to the system and return control back to the start.


Periodically the display may become scratched or otherwise a foreign object will be stuck to the front of the display. In this case the display will tend to provide false readings that the scratch or foreign object is indicative of a touch. In order to reduce the effects of scratches and foreign objects one or more bright reference images I1 may be obtained over a period of time. The set of one or more bright reference images I1 may be averaged if an insubstantial difference exists between the images. This reduces the likelihood that the display was touched during one or more of the image acquisitions. In the event that the images are substantially different then the images may be reacquired until an insubstantial difference exists.


When operated at low ambient lighting conditions it is difficult to detect the touching of the display. While under normal ambient lighting conditions it is desirable to adjust the output of the display in relation to the black reference image (I0). However, it has been determined that under low ambient lighting conditions it is desirable to adjust the output of the display in relation to the bright reference image (I1). Accordingly, one particular implementation may be described by the following equation: Ie={(Is−I1)/(I1−I0)}. The switching to night mode (low ambient lighting conditions) may be automatic or in response to a switch.


All references cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference.


The terms and expressions which have been employed in the foregoing specification are used therein as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention, in the use of such terms and expressions, of excluding equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof, it being recognized that the scope of the invention is defined and limited only by the claims which follow.

Claims
  • 1. A device, comprising: a stack of layers having a surface and being configured to display an image,multiple light sensitive elements, the multiple light sensitive elements including: a first region comprising a first density of the light sensitive elements, anda second region comprising a second density of the light sensitive elements, the first density being greater than the second density, anda processor configured to selectively operate in any one of multiple detection modes in which the processor detects an object on or near the surface in response to light based on a preconfigured sensitivity to light associated with the light sensitive elements,wherein the preconfigured sensitivity to light according to which the processor detects an object when operating in one of the detection modes differs from the preconfigured sensitivity to light according to which the processor detects an object when operating in other of the detection modes,the multiple light sensitive elements being configured to generate data indicative of a fingerprint when a finger is on or near the surface of the stack of layers, andthe processor being configured to identify the fingerprint based on the data from the multiple light sensitive elements.
  • 2. The device of claim 1, wherein the first region comprises multiple sub-pixels and wherein at least one of the light sensitive elements is associated with each of the multiple sub-pixels.
  • 3. The device of claim 1, wherein the stack of layers comprises multiple sub-pixels and wherein at least one of the light sensitive elements is associated with each of the multiple sub-pixels.
  • 4. The device of claim 1, wherein the multiple light sensitive elements are configured to sense both an absence of light and an addition of light at a location of an object on or near the surface.
  • 5. The device of claim 1, wherein the multiple light sensitive elements comprise: a first set of light sensitive elements configured to sense an absence of light at a location of an object on or near the surface, anda second set of light sensitive elements configured to sense an addition of light at a location of an object on or near the surface.
  • 6. The device of claim 1, wherein the each mode is associated with a distinct set of the multiple light sensitive elements configured for a particular lighting condition.
  • 7. The device of claim 1, wherein the first region is configured to sense light in a first lighting condition and the second region is configured to sense light in a second lighting condition different than the first lighting condition.
  • 8. The device of claim 1, wherein the selection of which one of the multiple detection modes the processor is to operate in when detecting an object is based on a current lighting condition.
  • 9. The device of claim 1, wherein the selection of which one of the multiple detection modes the processor is to operate in when detecting an object is made automatically.
  • 10. The device of claim 1, further comprising: a switch on the device configured to select which one of the multiple detection modes the processor is to operate in when detecting an object.
  • 11. The device of claim 1, wherein the device is configured to receive a communication from an optical pointing device and to automatically select which one of the multiple detection modes the processor is to operate in when detecting an object based on the communication.
  • 12. The device of claim 1, wherein the selection of which one of the multiple detection modes the processor is to operate in when detecting an object is based on a current lighting condition sensed by a light sensor distinct from the multiple light sensitive elements.
  • 13. The device of claim 5, wherein the selection of which one of the multiple detection modes the processor is to operate in when detecting an object is based on a current lighting condition sensed by a light sensor distinct from the first and the second sets of light sensitive elements.
  • 14. The device of claim 5, further comprising: a color filter layer located between the surface and at least a portion of the first and the second sets of light sensitive elements.
  • 15. A method, comprising: switching, via a device comprising a stack of layers, multiple light sensitive elements that includes a first region comprising a first density of the light sensitive elements and a second region comprising a second density of the light sensitive elements, the first density being greater than the second density, between any one of multiple detection modes in which the device detects an object on or near the surface in response to light based on a preconfigured sensitivity to light associated with the light sensitive elements, the preconfigured sensitivity to light according to which the device detects an object when operating in one of the detection modes differing from the preconfigured sensitivity to light according to which the processor detects an object when operating in other of the detection modes,generating, via the multiple light sensitive elements, data indicative of a fingerprint when a finger is on or near the surface of the stack of layers, andidentifying the fingerprint based on data generated via the multiple light sensitive elements.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the device switches between the detection modes automatically.
  • 17. The method of claim 15, wherein the device switches between the detection modes in response to a state of a switch on the device.
  • 18. The method of claim 15, wherein the device automatically switches between the detection modes in response to an optical pointing device communicating with the device.
  • 19. The method of claim 15, wherein the device switches between the detection modes based on a current lighting condition sensed by the light sensitive elements.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/568,316, filed Sep. 28, 2009, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/901,649, filed Sep. 18, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,134,851, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/371,413, filed Feb. 20, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,280,102, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/383,040, filed May 23, 2002, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/359,263, filed Feb. 20, 2002, the entireties of which are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (375)
Number Name Date Kind
3970846 Schofield, Jr. et al. Jul 1976 A
4220815 Gibson et al. Sep 1980 A
4320292 Oikawa et al. Mar 1982 A
4334219 Paülus et al. Jun 1982 A
4345248 Togashi et al. Aug 1982 A
4405921 Mukaiyama Sep 1983 A
4476463 Ng et al. Oct 1984 A
4481510 Hareng et al. Nov 1984 A
4484179 Kasday Nov 1984 A
4490607 Pease et al. Dec 1984 A
4496981 Ota Jan 1985 A
4542375 Alles et al. Sep 1985 A
4602321 Bornhorst Jul 1986 A
4603356 Bates Jul 1986 A
4642459 Casewell et al. Feb 1987 A
4644338 Aoki et al. Feb 1987 A
4655552 Togashi et al. Apr 1987 A
4662718 Masubuchi May 1987 A
4671671 Suetaka Jun 1987 A
4677428 Bartholow Jun 1987 A
4679909 Hamada et al. Jul 1987 A
4684939 Streit Aug 1987 A
4698460 Krein et al. Oct 1987 A
4705942 Budrikis et al. Nov 1987 A
4720869 Wadia Jan 1988 A
4736203 Sidlauskas Apr 1988 A
4740782 Aoki et al. Apr 1988 A
4749879 Peterson et al. Jun 1988 A
4759610 Yanagisawa Jul 1988 A
4767192 Chang et al. Aug 1988 A
4772101 Liu Sep 1988 A
4782327 Kley et al. Nov 1988 A
4782328 Denlinger Nov 1988 A
4785564 Gurtler Nov 1988 A
4794634 Torihata et al. Dec 1988 A
4814760 Johnston et al. Mar 1989 A
4823178 Suda Apr 1989 A
4838655 Hunahata et al. Jun 1989 A
4877697 Vollmann et al. Oct 1989 A
4893120 Doering et al. Jan 1990 A
4904056 Castleberry Feb 1990 A
4917474 Yamazaki et al. Apr 1990 A
4940901 Henry et al. Jul 1990 A
5003356 Wakai et al. Mar 1991 A
5039206 Wiltshire Aug 1991 A
5051570 Tsujikawa et al. Sep 1991 A
5063379 Fabry et al. Nov 1991 A
5083175 Hack et al. Jan 1992 A
5105186 May Apr 1992 A
5140153 Heikkinen et al. Aug 1992 A
5151688 Tanaka et al. Sep 1992 A
5153420 Hack et al. Oct 1992 A
5172104 Tanigaki et al. Dec 1992 A
5182661 Ikeda et al. Jan 1993 A
5204661 Hack et al. Apr 1993 A
5236850 Zhang Aug 1993 A
5237314 Knapp Aug 1993 A
5239152 Caldwell et al. Aug 1993 A
5243332 Jacobson Sep 1993 A
5276538 Monji et al. Jan 1994 A
5301048 Huisman Apr 1994 A
5308964 Kwon May 1994 A
5339090 Crossland et al. Aug 1994 A
5339091 Yamazaki et al. Aug 1994 A
5341133 Savoy et al. Aug 1994 A
5349174 Van Berkel et al. Sep 1994 A
5360426 Muller et al. Nov 1994 A
5369262 Dvorkis et al. Nov 1994 A
5376948 Roberts Dec 1994 A
5381251 Nonomura et al. Jan 1995 A
5386543 Bird Jan 1995 A
5387445 Horiuchi et al. Feb 1995 A
5414283 den Boer et al. May 1995 A
5422693 Vogeley et al. Jun 1995 A
5430462 Katagiri et al. Jul 1995 A
5445871 Murase et al. Aug 1995 A
5446564 Mawatari et al. Aug 1995 A
5461400 Ishii et al. Oct 1995 A
5475398 Yamazaki et al. Dec 1995 A
5483261 Yasutake Jan 1996 A
5483263 Bird et al. Jan 1996 A
5485177 Shannon et al. Jan 1996 A
5488204 Mead et al. Jan 1996 A
5502514 Vogeley et al. Mar 1996 A
5510916 Takahashi Apr 1996 A
5515186 Fergason et al. May 1996 A
5525813 Miyake et al. Jun 1996 A
5532743 Komobuchi Jul 1996 A
5559471 Black Sep 1996 A
5568292 Kim Oct 1996 A
5581378 Kulick et al. Dec 1996 A
5585817 Itoh et al. Dec 1996 A
5589961 Shigeta et al. Dec 1996 A
5598004 Powell et al. Jan 1997 A
5610629 Baur Mar 1997 A
5635982 Zhang et al. Jun 1997 A
5637187 Takasu et al. Jun 1997 A
5652600 Khormaei et al. Jul 1997 A
5659332 Ishii et al. Aug 1997 A
5677744 Yoneda et al. Oct 1997 A
5712528 Barrow et al. Jan 1998 A
5734491 Debesis Mar 1998 A
5751453 Baur May 1998 A
5757522 Kulick et al. May 1998 A
5767623 Friedman et al. Jun 1998 A
5777713 Kimura Jul 1998 A
5778108 Coleman, Jr. Jul 1998 A
5793342 Rhoads Aug 1998 A
5796121 Gates Aug 1998 A
5796473 Murata et al. Aug 1998 A
5812109 Kaifu et al. Sep 1998 A
5818037 Redford et al. Oct 1998 A
5818553 Koenck et al. Oct 1998 A
5818956 Tuli Oct 1998 A
5825352 Bisset et al. Oct 1998 A
5831693 McCartney, Jr. et al. Nov 1998 A
5834765 Ashdown Nov 1998 A
5835079 Shieh Nov 1998 A
5838290 Kuijk Nov 1998 A
5838308 Knapp et al. Nov 1998 A
5852487 Fujimori et al. Dec 1998 A
5877735 King et al. Mar 1999 A
5880411 Gillespie et al. Mar 1999 A
5883715 Steinlechner et al. Mar 1999 A
5890799 Yiu et al. Apr 1999 A
5917464 Stearns Jun 1999 A
5920360 Coleman, Jr. Jul 1999 A
5926238 Inoue et al. Jul 1999 A
5930591 Huang Jul 1999 A
5940049 Hinman et al. Aug 1999 A
5942761 Tuli Aug 1999 A
5959617 Bird et al. Sep 1999 A
5959697 Coleman, Jr. Sep 1999 A
5962856 Zhao et al. Oct 1999 A
5966108 Ditzik Oct 1999 A
5973312 Curling et al. Oct 1999 A
5990980 Golin Nov 1999 A
5990988 Hanihara et al. Nov 1999 A
5995172 Ikeda et al. Nov 1999 A
6020590 Aggas et al. Feb 2000 A
6020945 Sawai et al. Feb 2000 A
6023307 Park Feb 2000 A
6028581 Umeya Feb 2000 A
6049428 Khan et al. Apr 2000 A
6061177 Fujimoto May 2000 A
6067062 Takasu et al. May 2000 A
6067140 Woo et al. May 2000 A
6069393 Hatanaka et al. May 2000 A
6078378 Lu et al. Jun 2000 A
6087599 Knowles Jul 2000 A
6100538 Ogawa Aug 2000 A
6118435 Fujita et al. Sep 2000 A
6133906 Geaghan Oct 2000 A
6163313 Aroyan et al. Dec 2000 A
6177302 Yamazaki et al. Jan 2001 B1
6181394 Sanelle et al. Jan 2001 B1
6182892 Angelo et al. Feb 2001 B1
6184863 Sibert et al. Feb 2001 B1
6188391 Seely et al. Feb 2001 B1
6188781 Brownlee Feb 2001 B1
6232607 Huang May 2001 B1
6236053 Shariv May 2001 B1
6236063 Yamazaki et al. May 2001 B1
6242729 Izumi et al. Jun 2001 B1
6262408 Izumi et al. Jul 2001 B1
6265792 Granchukoff Jul 2001 B1
6271813 Palalau Aug 2001 B1
6278423 Wald et al. Aug 2001 B1
6278444 Wilson et al. Aug 2001 B1
6284558 Sakamoto Sep 2001 B1
6295113 Yang Sep 2001 B1
6300977 Waechter Oct 2001 B1
6310610 Beaton et al. Oct 2001 B1
6316790 Kodaira et al. Nov 2001 B1
6320617 Gee et al. Nov 2001 B1
6323490 Ikeda et al. Nov 2001 B1
6323846 Westerman et al. Nov 2001 B1
6327376 Harkin Dec 2001 B1
6333544 Toyoda et al. Dec 2001 B1
6351076 Yoshida et al. Feb 2002 B1
6351260 Graham et al. Feb 2002 B1
6357939 Baron Mar 2002 B1
6364829 Fulghum Apr 2002 B1
6377249 Mumford Apr 2002 B1
6380995 Kim Apr 2002 B1
6392254 Liu et al. May 2002 B1
6399166 Khan et al. Jun 2002 B1
6441362 Ogawa Aug 2002 B1
6453008 Sakaguchi et al. Sep 2002 B1
6462328 Toyoda et al. Oct 2002 B2
6465824 Kwasnick et al. Oct 2002 B1
6476447 Yamazaki et al. Nov 2002 B1
6489631 Young et al. Dec 2002 B2
6495387 French Dec 2002 B2
6504530 Wilson et al. Jan 2003 B1
6518561 Miura Feb 2003 B1
6521109 Bartic et al. Feb 2003 B1
6529189 Colgan et al. Mar 2003 B1
6552745 Perner Apr 2003 B1
6597348 Yamazaki et al. Jul 2003 B1
6603867 Sugino et al. Aug 2003 B1
6646636 Popovich et al. Nov 2003 B1
6667740 Dy et al. Dec 2003 B2
6679702 Rau Jan 2004 B1
6681034 Russo Jan 2004 B1
6690387 Zimmerman et al. Feb 2004 B2
6700144 Shimazaki et al. Mar 2004 B2
6718118 Oguro Apr 2004 B1
6720594 Rahn et al. Apr 2004 B2
6738031 Young et al. May 2004 B2
6741655 Chang et al. May 2004 B1
6762741 Weindorf Jul 2004 B2
6803906 Morrison et al. Oct 2004 B1
6815716 Sanson et al. Nov 2004 B2
6831710 den Boer Dec 2004 B2
6862022 Slupe Mar 2005 B2
6864882 Newton Mar 2005 B2
6879344 Nakamura et al. Apr 2005 B1
6879710 Hinoue et al. Apr 2005 B1
6888528 Rai et al. May 2005 B2
6947017 Gettemy Sep 2005 B1
6947102 den Boer et al. Sep 2005 B2
6972753 Kimura et al. Dec 2005 B1
6995743 den Boer et al. Feb 2006 B2
7006080 Gettemy Feb 2006 B2
7009663 Abileah et al. Mar 2006 B2
7015894 Morohoshi Mar 2006 B2
7023503 den Boer Apr 2006 B2
7053967 Abileah et al. May 2006 B2
7068254 Yamazaki et al. Jun 2006 B2
7098894 Yang et al. Aug 2006 B2
7109465 Kok et al. Sep 2006 B2
7157649 Hill Jan 2007 B2
7164164 Nakamura et al. Jan 2007 B2
7176905 Baharav et al. Feb 2007 B2
7177026 Perlin Feb 2007 B2
7184009 Bergquist Feb 2007 B2
7184064 Zimmerman et al. Feb 2007 B2
7190461 Han et al. Mar 2007 B2
7200288 Ogura Apr 2007 B2
7205988 Nakamura et al. Apr 2007 B2
7242049 Forbes et al. Jul 2007 B2
7250596 Reime Jul 2007 B2
7280102 Abileah et al. Oct 2007 B2
7298367 Geaghan et al. Nov 2007 B2
7348946 Booth, Jr. et al. Mar 2008 B2
7369690 Joo et al. May 2008 B2
7408598 den Boer et al. Aug 2008 B2
7418117 Kim et al. Aug 2008 B2
7450105 Nakamura et al. Nov 2008 B2
7456812 Smith et al. Nov 2008 B2
7463297 Yoshida et al. Dec 2008 B2
7483005 Nakamura et al. Jan 2009 B2
7522149 Nakamura et al. Apr 2009 B2
7535468 Uy May 2009 B2
7536557 Murakami et al. May 2009 B2
7545371 Nakamura et al. Jun 2009 B2
7598949 Han Oct 2009 B2
7629945 Baudisch Dec 2009 B2
7649527 Cho et al. Jan 2010 B2
7663607 Hotelling et al. Feb 2010 B2
7859519 Tulbert Dec 2010 B2
7924272 den Boer et al. Apr 2011 B2
8479122 Hotelling et al. Jul 2013 B2
20010000676 Zhang et al. May 2001 A1
20010003711 Coyer Jun 2001 A1
20010031074 Yamazaki Oct 2001 A1
20010044858 Rekimoto et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010046013 Noritake et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010052597 Young et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010055008 Young et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020027164 Mault et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020030581 Janiak et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020030768 Wu Mar 2002 A1
20020052192 Yamazaki et al. May 2002 A1
20020063518 Okamoto et al. May 2002 A1
20020067845 Griffis Jun 2002 A1
20020071074 Noritake et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020074549 Park et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020080123 Kennedy et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020080263 Krymski Jun 2002 A1
20020126240 Seiki et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020149571 Roberts Oct 2002 A1
20030020083 Hsiung et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030038778 Noguera Feb 2003 A1
20030103030 Wu Jun 2003 A1
20030117369 Spitzer et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030127672 Rahn et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030137494 Tulbert Jul 2003 A1
20030151569 Lee et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030156087 den Boer et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030156100 Gettemy Aug 2003 A1
20030156230 den Boer et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030174256 Kim et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030174870 Kim et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030179323 Abileah et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030183019 Chae Oct 2003 A1
20030205662 den Boer et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030218116 den Boer Nov 2003 A1
20030231277 Zhang Dec 2003 A1
20030234759 Bergquist Dec 2003 A1
20040046900 den Boer et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040113877 Abileah et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040125430 Kasajima et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040191976 Udupa et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040195489 Hamilton Oct 2004 A1
20040252867 Lan et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050040393 Hong Feb 2005 A1
20050110777 Geaghan et al. May 2005 A1
20050117079 Pak et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050134749 Abileah Jun 2005 A1
20050134751 Abileah et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050146517 Robrecht et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050173703 Lebrun Aug 2005 A1
20050179706 Childers Aug 2005 A1
20050200603 Casebolt et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050206764 Kobayashi et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050231656 den Boer et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050270590 Izumi et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050285985 den Boer et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060007224 Hayashi et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060007336 Yamaguchi Jan 2006 A1
20060010658 Bigley et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060034492 Siegel et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060120013 Diorio et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060125971 Abileah et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060170658 Nakamura et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060176288 Pittel et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060187367 Abileah et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060197753 Hotelling Sep 2006 A1
20060202975 Chiang Sep 2006 A1
20060249763 Mochizuki et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060250381 Geaghan Nov 2006 A1
20060279690 Yu et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070030258 Pittel et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070109239 den Boer et al. May 2007 A1
20070109286 Nakamura et al. May 2007 A1
20070131991 Sugawa Jun 2007 A1
20070216905 Han et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070279346 den Boer et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080029691 Han Feb 2008 A1
20080048995 Abileah et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080049153 Abileah et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080049154 Abileah et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080055295 den Boer et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080055496 Abileah et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080055497 Abileah et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080055498 Abileah et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080055499 den Boer et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080055507 den Boer et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080062156 Abileah et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080062157 Abileah et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080062343 den Boer et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080066972 Abileah et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080084374 Abileah et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080111780 Abileah et al. May 2008 A1
20080129909 den Boer et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080129913 den Boer et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080129914 den Boer et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080158172 Hotelling et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080165311 Abileah et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080284925 Han Nov 2008 A1
20080297487 Hotelling et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090167728 Geaghan et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090225210 Sugawa Sep 2009 A1
20100001978 Lynch et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100013793 Abileah et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100013794 Abileah et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100013796 Abileah et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100020044 Abileah et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100059296 Abileah et al. Mar 2010 A9
20100302419 den Boer et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110169771 Fujioka et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110304592 Booth et al. Dec 2011 A1
20130092941 Den Boer et al. Apr 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (64)
Number Date Country
3602796 Aug 1987 DE
19720925 Dec 1997 DE
0306596 Mar 1989 EP
0 366 913 May 1990 EP
0 384 509 Aug 1990 EP
0 426 362 May 1991 EP
0 426 469 May 1991 EP
0 464 908 Jan 1992 EP
0 488 455 Jun 1992 EP
0 490 683 Jun 1992 EP
0 491 436 Jun 1992 EP
0 509 589 Oct 1992 EP
0 545 709 Jun 1993 EP
0 572 009 Dec 1993 EP
0 572 182 Dec 1993 EP
0 587 236 Mar 1994 EP
0 601 837 Jun 1994 EP
0 618 527 Oct 1994 EP
0 633 542 Jan 1995 EP
0 770 971 May 1997 EP
1022675 Jul 2000 EP
1128170 Aug 2001 EP
55-74635 Jun 1980 JP
57-203129 Dec 1982 JP
60-179823 Sep 1985 JP
64-6927 Jan 1989 JP
64-40004 Feb 1989 JP
1-196620 Aug 1989 JP
2-182581 Jul 1990 JP
2-211421 Aug 1990 JP
5-019233 Jan 1993 JP
5-173707 Jul 1993 JP
5-243547 Sep 1993 JP
8-166849 Jun 1996 JP
8-321806 Dec 1996 JP
9-1279 Jan 1997 JP
9-185457 Jul 1997 JP
9-231002 Sep 1997 JP
9-274537 Oct 1997 JP
10-27068 Jan 1998 JP
10-40004 Feb 1998 JP
10-133817 May 1998 JP
10-133819 May 1998 JP
10-186136 Jul 1998 JP
10-198515 Jul 1998 JP
11-110110 Apr 1999 JP
11-242562 Sep 1999 JP
2000-020241 Jan 2000 JP
2000-163031 Jun 2000 JP
2002-342033 Nov 2002 JP
2005-129948 May 2005 JP
2005-352490 Dec 2005 JP
WO-9921160 Apr 1999 WO
WO-0145283 Jun 2001 WO
WO-2006104214 Oct 2006 WO
WO-2007145346 Dec 2007 WO
WO-2007145347 Dec 2007 WO
WO-2008018201 Feb 2008 WO
WO-2008044368 Apr 2008 WO
WO-2008044369 Apr 2008 WO
WO-2008044370 Apr 2008 WO
WO-2008044371 Apr 2008 WO
WO-2008047677 Apr 2008 WO
WO-2009081810 Jul 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (101)
Entry
Yamaguchi et al., “Two-dimensional Contact-Type Image Sensor Using Amorphous Silicon Photo-Transistor,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 32, pp. 458-461, Jan. 1993.
Kim et al., “Fingerprint Scanner Using a Si: H TFT-array,” SID '00 Digest, May 14, 2000.
International Search Report dated Nov. 11, 2003, directed to International Application No. PCT/US03/03277; 3 pages.
Top Touch-Screen Options, from the website of Industrial Technology (www.industrialtechnology.co.uk/2001/mar/touch.html) dated Oct. 29, 2001, 2 pages.
Y. Bobrov et al. (2002) “5.2 Manufacturing of a Thin-film LCD,” Optiva, Inc., San Francisco, CA, 4 pages.
W. den Boer et al. (2003) “Active Matrix LCD with Integrated Optical Touch Screen”; SID'03 (Baltimore) p. 1494-1497.
A. Abileah et al. (2004) “Integrated optical Touch Panel in a 14.1″ AMLCD”; SID'04 (Seattle) p. 1544-1547.
A. Abileah et al. (2006) “Optical Sensors Embedded within AMLCD panel: Design and Applications”; ADEAC'06, SID (Atlanta) p. 102-105.
A. Abileah et al. (2007) “Optical Sensors Embedded within AMLCD Panel: Design and Applications”; Siggraph-07, San Diego, 5 pages.
C. Brown et al. (2007) “A 2.6 inch VGA LCD with Optical Input Function using a 1-Transistor Active-Pixel Sensor”; ISSCC 2007 (&7.2) p. 132-133, 592.
S. Hong et al. (2005) “Smart LCD using a-Si photo sensor”; IMID'05 Digest p. 280-283.
International Search Report dated Apr. 14, 2003 directed to International Application No. PCT/US02/25573; 2 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Dec. 30, 2004, directed to International Application No. PCT/US02/25573; 16 pages.
International Search Report dated Jun. 16, 2003, directed to International Application No. PCT/US03/05300; 2 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Oct. 8, 2004, directed to International Application No. PCT/US03/05300; 15 pages.
International Search Report dated Sep. 21, 2007, directed to International Application No. PCT/US06/43741; 1 page.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Sep. 21, 2007, directed to International Application No. PCT/US06/43741; 4 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 11, 2016, directed to EP Application No. 06837297.8; 9 pages.
Notification of Reasons for Rejection dated Dec. 19, 2011, directed to JP Application No. 2008-540205; 6 pages.
Notification of Reasons for Rejection dated Sep. 24, 2013, directed to JP Application No. 2012-093530; 4 pages.
Echtler et al., (Jan. 2010) “An LED-based Multitouch Sensor for LCD Screens,” Cambridge, Massachusetts: ACM; 4 pages.
Rossiter et al., (2005) “A Novel Tactile Sensor Using a Matrix of LEDs Operating in Both Photoemitter and Photodetector Modes,” IEEE: 994-997.
Anita Kis, “Tactile Sensing and Analogic Algorithms,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Budapest 2006; 122 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/359,263, filed Feb. 20, 2002.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/383,040, filed May 23, 2002.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/736,708, filed Nov. 14, 2005.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/821,325, filed Aug. 3, 2006.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 23, 2009, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/407,545.
den Boer, U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 31, 2007, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 10/217,798; 10 pages.
den Boer, U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2007, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 10/217,798; 11 pages.
den Boer, U.S. Office Action dated May 12, 2006, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 10/217,798; 8 pages.
den Boer, U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 13, 2006, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 10/217,798; 9 pages.
den Boer, U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 23, 2005, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 10/217,798; 10 pages.
den Boer, U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 10, 2004, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 10/217,798; 10 pages.
den Boer, U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2004, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 10/217,798; 17 pages.
den Boer, U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 4, 2003, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 10/217,798; 17 pages.
den Boer, U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2004, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 10/307,106; 9 pages.
den Boer, U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2005, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 10/329,217; 13 pages.
den Boer, U.S. Office Action dated May 21, 2004, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 10/329,217; 14 pages.
den Boer et al, U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2008 directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/137,753; 16 pages.
den Boer et al, U.S. Office Action dated May 23, 2007 directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/137,753; 12 pages.
den Boer et al., U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 25, 2009, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/980,029; 10 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 9, 2005, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 10/442,433; 13 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 21, 2004, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 10/442,433; 7 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 29, 2011, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,911; 20 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2011, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,911; 23 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2010, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,830; 8 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2006, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 10/371,413; 7 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2005, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 10/371,413; 7 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 15, 2005, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 10/371,413; 5 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 29, 2010, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/901,649; 22 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2011, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/901,649; 20 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2012, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,864; 6 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2012, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,864; 8 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 1, 2013, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,864; 8 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2016, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,864; 8 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2010, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,339; 9 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 21, 2011, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,339; 11 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 17, 2011, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,339; 9 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 14, 2014, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,339; 10 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 1, 2011, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/978,031; 20 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated May 18, 2011, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/978,031; 17 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 29, 2012, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/978,031; 20 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 3, 2013, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/978,031; 20 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 13, 2010, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/978,006; 9 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 24, 2011, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/978,006; 12 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2010, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,279; 10 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 5, 2011, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,279; 10 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 27, 2014, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,279; 11 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 4, 2011, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/568,302; 30 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2012, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/568,302; 14 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 2, 2011, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/568,316; 32 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2012, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/568,316; 16 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated May 7, 2013, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/568,316; 14 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 13, 2014, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/568,316; 15 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 12, 2005, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 10/347,149; 4 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2005, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 10/347,149; 10 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 22, 2005, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 10/739,455; 10 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 24, 2009, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/351,098; 11 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 24, 2008, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/351,098; 12 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2007, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/351,098; 6 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2007, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/351,098; 13 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2012, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/566,455; 9 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 11, 2012, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/566,455; 8 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2012, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/566,477; 11 pages.
Abileah et al., U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2012, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/566,477; 12 pages.
den Boer et al., U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2011 directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/852,883; 16 pages.
Den Boer et al., U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 18, 2013, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 13/652,007; 18 pages.
Den Boer et al., U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 28, 2014, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 13/652,007; 16 pages.
den Boer et al., U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 14, 2010, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,071; 8 pages.
den Boer et al., U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2011, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,071; 9 pages.
den Boer et al., U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2012, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,071; 15 pages.
Den Boer et al., U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 11, 2013, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,071; 13 pages.
Den Boer et al., U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 1, 2016, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,071; 16 pages.
Lee, S.K. et al. (Apr. 1985). “A Multi-Touch Three Dimensional Touch-Sensitive Tablet,” Proceedings of CHI: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 21-25.
Rubine, D.H. (Dec. 1991). “The Automatic Recognition of Gestures,” CMU-CS-91-202, Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science at Carnegie Mellon University, 285 pages.
Rubine, D.H. (May 1992). “Combining Gestures and Direct Manipulation,” CHI '92, pp. 659-660.
Westerman, W. (Spring 1999). “Hand Tracking, Finger Identification, and Chordic Manipulation on a Multi-Touch Surface,” A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Electrical Engineering, 364 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated May 31, 2017, for EP Application No. 17160045.5, filed Nov. 10, 2006, nine pages.
Final Office Action dated Jun. 16, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,071, filed Nov. 8, 2006, twelve pages.
Final Office Action dated Jun. 16, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,864, filed Oct. 26, 2007, ten pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170003827 A1 Jan 2017 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
60383040 May 2002 US
60359263 Feb 2002 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 12568316 Sep 2009 US
Child 15269453 US
Parent 11901649 Sep 2007 US
Child 12568316 US
Parent 10371413 Feb 2003 US
Child 11901649 US