The present invention relates to using Light Emitting Diodes for illumination.
Among the trends redefining 21st century biomedical diagnostics and therapeutics is the design of low-cost portable analyzers. Because light is a powerful tool in many of today's most widely used life science instruments, high intensity, low cost light engines are essential to the design and proliferation of the newest bio-analytical instruments, medical devices and miniaturized analyzers. The development of new light technology represents a critical technical hurdle in the realization of point-of-care analysis.
Embodiments of the present invention are directed to methods and devices for converting the output of a specific color LED and generating a broader band of wavelengths of emission including not only the specific color but additional color output. Specific embodiments, as will be described below, minimize backward directed light while increasing the total range of wavelengths emitted.
Lighting for life sciences is a broad and general category. Not only are the source specifications varied but so too are the equally important optical delivery requirements. Spectral and spatial lighting requirements for sensing on the head of an optical probe or within a single cell in a flowing stream differ in output power by orders of magnitude from the requirements of a multi-analyte detection scheme on an analysis chip or within the wells of a micro-titer plate. The number of colors, spectral purity, spectral and power stability, durability and switching requirements are each unique. Illuminating hundreds of thousands of spots for quantitative fluorescence within a micro-array may be best served by projection optics while microscopes set demanding specifications for light delivery to overfill the back aperture of the microscope objective within optical trains specific to each scope body and objective design.
While lighting manufacturers cannot provide all things to all applications, it is precisely this breadth of demand for which a light engine can be designed. To that end, products are not simple sources, but rather light engines: sources and all the ancillary components required to provide pure, powerful, light to the sample or as close to it as mechanically possible. Such designs have resulted in products that embody a flexible, hybrid solution to meet the needs of the broad array of applications for biotech. A qualitative comparison of light engine performance as a function of source technology is summarized in Table 1.
Historically arc lamps are noted to be flexible sources in that they provide white light. The output is managed, with numerous optical elements, to select for the wavelengths of interest and for typical fluorescence based instruments, to discriminate against the emission bands. However their notorious instability and lack of durability in addition to their significant heat management requirements make them less than ideal for portable analyzers. Moreover, large power demands to drive them present a barrier to battery operation within a compact design.
Lasers require a trained user and significant safety precautions. While solid state red outputs are cost effective, the shorter wavelength outputs are typically costly, require significant maintenance and ancillary components. Color balance and drift for multi-line outputs is a serious complication to quantitative analyses based on lasers. Moreover, the bulk of fluorescence applications do not need coherent light, are complicated by speckle patterns and do not require such narrowband outputs. Overcoming each of these traits requires light management and adds cost to the implementation of lasers for most bio-analytical tools.
Finally LEDs, have matured significantly within the last decades. LEDs are now available in a relatively wide range of wavelengths. However their output is significantly broad so as to require filtering. Additionally, output in the visible spectrum is profoundly reduced in the green, 500-600 not. The LED also presents trade-offs with respect to emission wavelength dependent intensity, broad emission spectrum (spectral half width on the order of 30 nm or more), poor spectral stability, and the wide angular range of emission. In addition, the process used to manufacture LED's cannot tightly control their spectral stability; anyone wishing to use LED's in applications requiring a good spectral stability must work directly with a supplier to essentially hand-pick the LED's for the particular application. Finally, LED's generate light over a wide angular range (50% of light intensity emitted at 70°). While optics can narrow the emission band and focus the light output, the resulting loss in power and increase in thermal output further limit the feasibility of LED light engines.
Most importantly, these light technologies cannot be readily improved for bioanalytical applications. The associated light engine market simply does not justify the large investment necessary to overcome fundamental performance limitations. As a result, analytical instrument performance and price is constrained by the light source with no clear solution in sight. Moreover the numerous manufacturers of lamps and lasers provide only a source, not an integrated light engine. Companies such as ILC Technology, Lumileds, Spectra-Physics, Sylvania and CooILED require some sort of mechanics and or electro-optics such as acousto-optic tunable filters (AOTFs), excitation filters (with a wheel or cube holder), shutters and controllers.
While no one lighting solution can best satisfy all instrument architectures, a light pipe engine combines the best of solid state technologies to meet or outperform the traditional technologies listed in Table I on the basis of all figures of merit for all individual wavelengths. Key to this performance is the light pipe architecture. Single outputs, such as red from a diode laser, may be competitive. However, no family of outputs can by assembled that bests the light pipe disclosed herein. In an embodiment of the invention, a light pipe engine can emit narrowband light exceeding 500 mW/color with intensifies up to 10 W/cm2 depending on the application. In an embodiment of the invention, bandwidths as narrow as 10 nm are achievable. While such output power and overall emission intensity is impressive, the most significant figure of merit for quantifying the value of any lighting subsystem for bio-analytics is the intensity of high quality illumination provided to the sample. This is a factor dictated by the instrument design and sample volume and clearly very application specific.
In the case of medical devices and portable diagnostics the present light pipe invention offers a smart alternative for light generation. The light pipe engine is an optical subsystem; it consists of lamp modules for each discrete output based on solid state technologies tailored to best satisfy that output requirement complete with collection and delivery optics. The capabilities of the light pipe engine are highlighted in Table 2. The high performance illumination provided by the light pipe engine is embodied in a single compact unit designed to replace the entire ensemble of lighting components. The sources, excitation filters, multicolor switching capabilities and fast pulsing are contained within one box such that no external optics or mechanics are required.
An inexpensive lighting solution, uniquely well suited to the production of safe, effective and commercially viable life science tools and biomedical devices can be attained using a solid-state light engine. In an embodiment of the invention, this light engine can provide powerful, pure, stable, inexpensive light across the Ultraviolet-visible-near infrared (UV-Vis-NIR). Light engines are designed to directly replace the entire configuration of light management components with a single, simple unit. Power, spectral breadth and purity, stability and reliability data will demonstrate the advantages of these light engines for today's bioanalytical needs. Performance and cost analyses can be compared to traditional optical subsystems based on lamps, lasers and LEDs with respect to their suitability as sources for biomedical applications, implementation for development/evaluation of novel measurement tools and overall superior reliability. Using such sources the demand for portable, hand-held analyzers and disposable devices with highly integrated light sources can be fulfilled.
Lamp
In various embodiments of the present invention, a lamp emits wavelengths of light, which excite fluorescence from photosensitive targets in the sample of interest. In various embodiments of the present invention, a lamp can be in the form of a tube, rod, or fiber of varying or constant diameter. In various embodiments of the present invention, a constituent light pipe can be made of glass, plastic, single or multiple inorganic crystal(s), or a confined liquid. In various embodiments of the present invention, a pipe either contains or is coated with a layer or layers containing, a narrowband luminescent material such as organic or inorganic compounds involving rare earths, transition metals or donor-acceptor pairs. In various embodiments of the present invention, a lamp emits confined luminescence when excited by IR, UV, or visible light from an LED, Laser, fluorescent tube, arc lamp, incandescent lamp or other light source. In an embodiment of the present invention, a lamp operates through the process of spontaneous emission, which results in a much larger selection of available wavelengths than is available for efficient stimulated emission (laser action).
Relay Optics
In an embodiment of the present invention, relay optics consist of light pipes, optical fibers, lenses and filters, which optically transport the light from a lamp to one or more capillaries and light pipes, optical fibers, lenses and filters which collect and transport any generated fluorescence to an appropriate detector or array of detectors, in conjunction with adaptors for coupling the excitation light into the capillaries, coupling the emission light out of the capillaries and for enhancing physical discrimination of the excitation and emission. In an embodiment of the present invention, relay optics, including fibers, can be constructed in a loop or as a cavity so that light from a lamp can pass through one or more capillaries multiple times to enhance excitation efficiency.
In an embodiment of the present invention, a number of lamps each emitting one or more color of light can have their constituent light pipes coupled in parallel or in series acting to produce multiple colors simultaneously or in sequence. In an embodiment of the present invention, one or more lamps can illuminate single channels, multiple parallel channels, multiple channels in multiple dimensions, numerous spots along the analysis channel and/or reservoirs connected to the flow streams.
In an embodiment of the present invention, lamps can be illuminated continuously during the measurement process or can be pulsed on and off rapidly to enable time-based detection methods. In an embodiment of the present invention, a lamp can be switched off between measurements, to eliminate the heat output. This can be contrasted with alternatives such as arc lamps or lasers that are unstable unless they are operated continuously.
Illumination and Collection System
In an embodiment of the present invention, a flexible illumination and collection system for capillary/fluorescence apparatus allows for a varying number of samples to be analyzed simultaneously. ‘Simultaneously’ is herein defined as occurring close in time. Two light pipes can irradiate two capillaries at the same time and the fluorescence from the molecules in one of the capillaries can be delayed due to physical or chemical effects relating to absorption, phosphorescence and/or fluorescence resulting in a delay in the fluorescence from the molecules in one of the capillaries. This excitation is still considered to result in ‘simultaneous detection’. In an embodiment of the present invention, an illumination and collection system can be adjusted for uniform illumination of multiple capillaries. In an embodiment of the present invention, illumination systems can irradiate an array of channels in an array of capillaries. In an embodiment of the present invention, an array of channels can be etched, molded, embossed into the capillaries. In an embodiment of the present invention, a set of wells intimately connected to fluidic conduits can be stepped along the length of the fluidic conduit such that they can be interrogated at numerous sites for the purposes of creating a map or image of the reacting species.
In an embodiment of the present invention, an illumination and collection system can emit multiple colors as desired. In an embodiment of the present invention, an illumination and collection system can be pulsed on and off as desired to reduce heat generation. In an embodiment of the present invention, an illumination and collection system can be pulsed on and off to allow time-based fluorescence detection.
In an embodiment of the present invention, illumination systems can irradiate homogeneous reactions within fluidic conduits or reservoirs. In an embodiment of the present invention, illumination systems can irradiate heterogeneous reactions on the surface of fluidic conduits or reservoirs. In an embodiment of the present invention, illumination systems can irradiate homogeneous or heterogeneous reactions on the surface of or within the pores of a porous reaction support.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following description of the various embodiments, when read in light of the accompanying drawings.
Various embodiments of the present invention can be described in detail based on the following figures, wherein:
Shown in
The light pipe geometry provides a unique opportunity to shape and direct the angular and spatial range of outputs. Combined with a high output power, the delivery optics can be readily tailored to couple the light with various instruments and analyzers. Sensors, optical probes, microscope objectives or through liquid light guides, two-dimensional oligomer and micro fluidic chips, and micro titer plates are all illumination fields that light pipe engines can readily support. Moreover, high output power enables illumination of large areas within a chip, micro array or micro titer plate and, as a result, support high-speed throughput in instruments where to date only scanning modes of operation could be envisioned.
The preferred mode of light pipe excitation is the application of one or more LED's. This approach takes advantages of the benefits of LED illumination: low cost, durability, and, at an appropriate excitation wavelength, high output power to drive the light pipe. In so doing the LED's shortcomings are managed. The lack of spectral stability and the high angular output characteristic of LED's do not impact the luminescence of the light pipe. Instead, the innovation of the light pipe enables circumvention of the principle of etendue conservation. All light sources must conform to this dictate, which requires the spread of light from a source never exceed the product of the area and the solid angle. Etendue cannot decrease in any given optical system.
The ability to modulate solid-state source outputs provides a unique opportunity for multiplexed fluorescent assays. Current light engine designs employ solid state materials with fast luminescence (approximately 10 ns.) The light pipe and LED have similar modulation capabilities thus multiple light pipes tuned to different output wavelengths can be employed to selectively detect multiple fluorescent tags within a given analysis. In addition, pulse modulation and phase modulation techniques enable fluorescence lifetime detection and afford improved signal to noise ratios. Each of the solid state units is truly off when it is off so low background signals and high contrast ratios are possible.
Table III shows an embodiment of the present light pipe engine invention's product and performance features. As improvements are made to LED's and the cost of semiconductor lasers continue to decline, the tool chest of options available to light lipe engines will continue to evolve. The desired light engine can ultimately be powered by a combination of light pipe, LED's and lasers. The knowledge and competency to integrate any of these lighting technologies into the delivery optics supports the requirements of each specific application and provides technical and commercial value.
Eight Light Engine Subsystem
The light engine subsystem is designed to interface to the array of bioanalytical tools with the expectation that the end user can take for granted the high quality of the illumination. Table IV summarizes four bioanalytical applications for which light engines including light pipes could replace more traditional illumination subsystems and offer performance and cost advantages. For example, Kohler illumination in transmitted light microscopy requires that the light be focused and collimated down the entire optical path of the microscope to provide optimal specimen illumination. Even light intensity across a fairly large plane is a critical requirement. For stereomicroscopy, lighting is achieved with ring-lights at the objective and fiber optic lights pointed at the specimen from the side. In both cases, the light engine must efficiently couple to a fiber optic cable.
For portable diagnostic tools, the delivery optics must provide even illumination over a small volume. These requirements are similar to, but less restrictive than those presented by capillary electrophoresis. Capillary electrophoresis requires an intense (10 mW) light focused onto the side of a capillary tube with characteristic dimensions on the order of a 350 pm outer diameter and a 50 pro inner diameter. To achieve this goal, the delivery optics were comprised of a ball lens to collect and collimate light from the lamp module (already coupled into an optical fiber), a bandpass filter to provide a narrowbandwidth of illumination, and an aspheric lens to focus the light at the center of the capillary bore. This approach yielded an 80 pin spot size and the desired 10 mW of delivered power to the capillary tube.
The design of delivery optics for microfluidic immunoassays requires both the even illumination required for optical microscopy and the small volume illumination required for capillary electrophoresis. Light engines capable of delivering even illumination at the active sites in a microfluidic array for detection of fluorescent tagged biomarkers have been designed for immunochemical as well as genomic applications. The advantages of the luminescent light pipe are providing commercial, readily available light engine solutions for illumination-detection platforms optimized for portable diagnostic tools.
Spectral Bands and Output Power
In various embodiments of the present invention, the light pipe engine performs well compared with the output power across the visible spectrum to other lamps (see
Such output comparisons are further complicated by mismatches between the spikes of the metal halide bulb and light pipe light engine output bands, However, noting such disparities it is fair to claim the outputs of the light engine across the visible spectrum compare well against the outputs of a metal halide bulb in spectral windows that match the excitation energies of some of the most commonly used fluors for biotech: around 390 nm where DAPI and Hoescht can be excited; in the window most commonly associated with a cyan line of an argon ion laser and often used to excite Alexa dyes, green fluorescent proteins and fluoresceins; and in the red where neither of the lamps provides appreciable power for the likes of Cy5. The light engine also bests the Xenon lamp across the palate of excitation wavelengths most common to biotech: the Xenon lamp underperforms particularly in the violet, cyan, blue and red regions of the visible spectrum. Of course, more powerful Xenon lamps are often employed to provide enhanced performance at a significant maintanence cost.
In another embodiment of the present invention, as seen in
Alternatively, a light pipe engine can be employed in a short duty cycle mode for power starved applications. When feasible, pulse widths of less than 100 ms at 10% duty cycles can actually improve the power output per band by a factor of 1.5 to 2.0 over longer duty cycles or in continuous mode of operation. Applications that employ multiple lasers and acousto-optic tunable filters (AOTFs) but need safe, cost effective and easy to employ lighting solutions might benefit from such light engine performance. Fluorescence microscopy for multicolor detection could take advantage of this option, for example. As could numerous other bioanalytical platforms such as a light engine replacement for the optical excitation from AOTF-based multicolor fluorescence detection for short tandem repeat (STR) analysis in a micro-eletrophoretic device, a glass microchip.
Fast Switching
Because of the solid state nature and independently operable designs of the lamp modules, coupled to fast (approximately 10 ns) decay times of typical materials employed, a light pipe based light engine outperforms any broad spectrum source in terms of support for fast analyses. Lamp based sources are coupled to filters and/or shutters with mechanical supports that relegate them 1 to 50 millisecond regimes. Even LED based lamps require filtering for most quantitative fluorescence based analyses. The light pipe based light engine incorporates all that filtering into its highly integrated design. Therefore switching times are limited today by the electronics of the boards controlling the sources. Rise times of less than 20 μs and fall times of less than 2 us are typical (see
Stability
Because a light pipe based light engine is based on solid state technologies, they are extremely stable both in short duration experiments and over long term use.
The foregoing description of the various embodiments of the present invention has been provided for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to the practitioner skilled in the art. Embodiments were chosen and described in order to best describe the principles of the invention and its practical application, thereby enabling others skilled in the art to understand the invention, the various embodiments and with various modifications that are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the following claims and their equivalents.
Other features, aspects and objects of the invention can be obtained from a review of the figures and the claims. It is to be understood that other embodiments of the invention can be developed and fall within the spirit and scope of the invention and claims
This present application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/416,125 filed Mar. 9, 2012, entitled “Lighting Design of High Quality Biomedical Devices” which is a continuation application of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/691,601, filed Jan. 21, 2010, entitled “Lighting Design of High Quality Biomedical Devices” which claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/147,040, filed on Jan. 23, 2009, entitled “Lighting Design of High Quality Biomedical Devices,” all or which applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1998054 | McBurney | Apr 1935 | A |
3313337 | Bernat | Apr 1967 | A |
3637285 | Stewart | Jan 1972 | A |
3759604 | Thelen | Sep 1973 | A |
3881800 | Friesem | May 1975 | A |
3982151 | Ludovici | Sep 1976 | A |
4003080 | Maiman | Jan 1977 | A |
4298820 | Bongers | Nov 1981 | A |
4371897 | Kramer | Feb 1983 | A |
4510555 | Mori | Apr 1985 | A |
4539687 | Gordon | Sep 1985 | A |
4602281 | Nagasaki et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4626068 | Caldwell | Dec 1986 | A |
4642695 | Iwasaki | Feb 1987 | A |
4644141 | Hagen | Feb 1987 | A |
4657013 | Hoerenz et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4695332 | Gordon | Sep 1987 | A |
4695732 | Ward | Sep 1987 | A |
4695762 | Berkstresser | Sep 1987 | A |
4713577 | Gualtieri | Dec 1987 | A |
4724356 | Daehler | Feb 1988 | A |
4798994 | Rijpers | Jan 1989 | A |
4804850 | Norrish et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4852985 | Fujihara et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4937661 | Van Der Voort | Jun 1990 | A |
4995043 | Kuwata | Feb 1991 | A |
5052016 | Mahbobzadeh | Sep 1991 | A |
5089860 | Deppe | Feb 1992 | A |
5109463 | Lee | Apr 1992 | A |
5126626 | Iwasaki | Jun 1992 | A |
5128846 | Mills et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5137598 | Thomas | Aug 1992 | A |
5193015 | Shanks | Mar 1993 | A |
5200861 | Moskovich | Apr 1993 | A |
5226053 | Cho | Jul 1993 | A |
5231533 | Gonokami | Jul 1993 | A |
5233372 | Matsumoto | Aug 1993 | A |
5249195 | Feldman | Sep 1993 | A |
5285131 | Muller | Feb 1994 | A |
5289018 | Okuda | Feb 1994 | A |
5312535 | Waska | May 1994 | A |
5315128 | Hunt | May 1994 | A |
5332892 | Li et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5345333 | Greenberg | Sep 1994 | A |
5363398 | Glass | Nov 1994 | A |
5416342 | Edmond et al. | May 1995 | A |
5416617 | Loiseaux | May 1995 | A |
5418584 | Larson | May 1995 | A |
5428476 | Jensen | Jun 1995 | A |
5469018 | Jacobsen | Nov 1995 | A |
5475281 | Heijboer | Dec 1995 | A |
5478658 | Dodabalapur | Dec 1995 | A |
5489771 | Beach et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5493177 | Muller | Feb 1996 | A |
5500569 | Blomberg | Mar 1996 | A |
5542016 | Kaschke | Jul 1996 | A |
5616986 | Jacobsen | Apr 1997 | A |
5644676 | Blomberg | Jul 1997 | A |
5658976 | Carpenter | Aug 1997 | A |
5669692 | Thorgersen | Sep 1997 | A |
5671050 | De Groot | Sep 1997 | A |
5674698 | Zarling | Oct 1997 | A |
5690417 | Polidor et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5715083 | Takayama | Feb 1998 | A |
5719391 | Kain | Feb 1998 | A |
5757014 | Bruno | May 1998 | A |
5781338 | Kapitza et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5803579 | Turnbull et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5804919 | Jacobsen | Sep 1998 | A |
5808759 | Okamori et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5827438 | Blomberg | Oct 1998 | A |
5833827 | Anazawa | Nov 1998 | A |
5858562 | Utsugi | Jan 1999 | A |
5864426 | Songer | Jan 1999 | A |
5942319 | Oyama | Aug 1999 | A |
5955839 | Jaffe | Sep 1999 | A |
5984861 | Crowley | Nov 1999 | A |
6110106 | MacKinnon et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6154282 | Lilge et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6198211 | Jaffe | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204971 | Morris | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6222673 | Austin | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6293911 | Imaizumi et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299338 | Levinson | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304584 | Krupke | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6366383 | Roeder | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392341 | Jacobsen | May 2002 | B2 |
6404127 | Jacobsen | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6404495 | Melman | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6422994 | Kaneko et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6444476 | Morgan | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6513962 | Mayshack et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6517213 | Fujita et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529322 | Jones | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542231 | Garrett | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6544734 | Briscoe | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6594075 | Kanao et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6608332 | Shimizu | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6614161 | Jacobsen et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6614179 | Shimizu et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6637905 | Ng | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6642652 | Collins et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6649432 | Eilers | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6674575 | Tandler et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6680569 | Mueller-Mach et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685341 | Ouderkirk et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6690467 | Reel | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6717353 | Mueller | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6747710 | Hall | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6791259 | Stokes et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6791629 | Moskovich | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6795239 | Tandler et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6843590 | Jones | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6869206 | Zimmerman et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870165 | Amirkhanian | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6926848 | Le Mercier | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6958245 | Seul et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6960872 | Beeson et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6981970 | Karni | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6991358 | Kokogawa | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6995355 | Rain, Jr. et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7009211 | Eilers | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7011421 | Hulse et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7035017 | Tadic-Galeb | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7083610 | Murray et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7141801 | Goodwin | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7153015 | Brukilacchio | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7192161 | Cleaver et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7205048 | Naasani | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7208007 | Nightingale et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7211833 | Slater, Jr. et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7239449 | Leitel et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7300175 | Brukilacchio | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7316497 | Rutherford et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7384797 | Blair | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7416313 | Westphal et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7422356 | Hama et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7427146 | Conner | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7445340 | Conner | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7467885 | Grotsch et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7488088 | Brukilacchio | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7488101 | Brukilacchio | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7498734 | Suehiro et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7540616 | Conner | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7633093 | Blonder et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7709811 | Conner | May 2010 | B2 |
7746560 | Yamazaki | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7832878 | Brukilacchio | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7837348 | Narendran et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7854514 | Conner | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7857457 | Rutherford et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8029142 | Conner | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8098375 | Brukilacchio | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20010055208 | Kimura | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020109844 | Christel et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020127224 | Chen | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030044160 | Jonese et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030095401 | Hanson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030127609 | El-Hage et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030160151 | Zarate et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030230728 | Dai | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233138 | Spooner | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040090600 | Blei | May 2004 | A1 |
20040247861 | Naasani | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050062404 | Jones et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050116635 | Walson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050146652 | Yokoyama et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050152029 | Endo | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050184651 | Cheng | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050201899 | Weisbuch | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050248839 | Yamaguchi | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050260676 | Chandler | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050263679 | Fan | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060002131 | Schultz et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060030026 | Garcia | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060060872 | Edmond et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060879 | Edmond | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060114960 | Snee | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060170931 | Guo | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060237658 | Waluszko | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060282137 | Nightingale et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070053184 | Brukilacchio | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070053200 | Brukilacchio | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058389 | Brukilacchio | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070064202 | Moffat et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070086006 | Ebersole et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070126017 | Krames et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070211460 | Ravkin | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070253733 | Fey | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070279914 | Rutherford et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070279915 | Rutherford et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070280622 | Rutherford et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070281322 | Jaffe et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070284513 | Fan | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070297049 | Schadwinkel et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080079910 | Rutherford et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080224024 | Ashdown | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080291446 | Smith | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090122533 | Brukilacchio | May 2009 | A1 |
20090196046 | Rutherford et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090268461 | Deak et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100188017 | Brukilacchio | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 280 398 | Apr 2000 | CA |
1 426 807 | Dec 2003 | EP |
0943756 | Dec 1963 | GB |
2 000 173 | Jan 1979 | GB |
02-804873 | Jul 1998 | JP |
2005-195485 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005-243973 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006-049814 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2007-133435 | May 2007 | JP |
10-2006-0055934 | May 2006 | KR |
10-2006-0089104 | Aug 2006 | KR |
WO 02080577 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 2004114053 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2006067885 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006120586 | Nov 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120236585 A1 | Sep 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61147040 | Jan 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13416125 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 13484031 | US | |
Parent | 12691601 | Jan 2010 | US |
Child | 13416125 | US |