1. Field of the Invention
This present invention is related in general to methods and structures for filtering radio waves. More particularly, the invention is directed to methods and structures for fabricating lightweight cavity resonator filters.
2. Description of the Prior Art and Related Background Information
Embodiments disclosed herein are related to a family of electrical circuits generally referred to as cavity resonator filters, which are used in radio frequency transceiver chains. Cavity resonator filters aid with receiving and transmitting radio waves in selected frequency bands. Typically, such filter structures are formed by coupling a number of coaxial cavity resonators or dielectrically loaded cavity resonators via capacitors, transformers, or by apertures in walls separating the resonators. It is noticeable that, unlike the general trend in electric and electronic devices where in recent years significant miniaturization has been achieved, efforts to downsize radio frequency (“RF”) filters have been inhibited. This is primarily due to the fact that, to meet low loss and high selectivity requirements, air-cavity filters with dimensions approaching a fraction of free space wavelength are required. U.S. Pat. No. 5,894,250 is an example of such a filter implementation.
The pursuit of improving the RF bandwidth efficiency in cellular infrastructure has led to increasingly stringent filtering requirements at the RF front end. High selectivity and low insertion loss filters are in demand in order to conserve valuable frequency spectrum and enhance system DC to RF conversion efficiency. Filter structures with spurious-free performance are needed to meet the out-of-band requirements. Furthermore, it is also desired that such filters have both low costs and small form factors to fit into compact radio transceivers units, often deployed remotely for coverage optimizations. The size and weight constraints are even more exasperated by the advent of multiple-input multiple-output (“MIMO”) transceivers. Depending on implementation in a MIMO system, the number of duplexer filters may range from two to eight times that of a single-input single-output (“SISO”) unit, all of which requires smaller and lighter filter structures. The desire for smaller size conflicts with the electrical performance requirement that resonators achieve very high unloaded Q-factor, which demands larger resonating elements.
An RF bandpass filter can achieve a higher selectivity by increasing the number of poles, i.e., the number of resonators. However, because the quality factor of the resonators is finite, the passband insertion loss of the filter increases as the number of resonators is increased. Therefore, there is always a trade-off between the selectivity and the passband insertion loss. On the other hand, for specified filter selectivity, certain types of filter characteristics that not only meet the selectivity requirement, but also result in a minimum passband insertion loss, are required. One such filter with these characteristics is the elliptic function response filter. Notable progress has been made on improving the size, and the in-band and out-of-band performance of the filters. However the size and the associated weight reduction of such structures present formidable challenges in remote radio head products.
Most cellular standards operate in Frequency Division Duplex (“FDD”) mode. This means that for each transceiver, there are a pair of filters forming a duplexer filter structure. As mentioned earlier, more recent architectures, such as MIMO systems, incorporate several duplexers packaged in a single radio enclosure. The relatively large-sized cavity resonators coupled with expected large filter selectivity means that the duplexer(s) practically occupies a large space and forms the main mass of a remote radio head (“RRH”) unit. This is an insurmountable design challenge particularly in the sub-gigahertz bands that are allocated to mobile telephony services.
The forgoing discussion defines the mechanical structure of a typical filter. The structure is normally machined or cast out of aluminum. In order to reduce the weight, the excess metal is machined off from the main body of the structure. This arrangement is shown in
Accordingly, a need exists to reduce the weight of cavity resonator filter structures.
In a first aspect, the present invention provides a method for forming a lightweight cavity filter structure comprising providing a mold having a contoured surface inversely shaped to that of a cavity filter structure, and depositing one or more layers of metal onto the mold, the one or more layers of the metal having a total thickness on the order of one to several times the skin depth associated with the operating radio frequency of the cavity filter structure. The method further comprises depositing one or more layers of laminate onto the layer of metal, where the one or more layers of laminate is adapted for providing mechanical support to the cavity filter structure, and separating the one or more layers of metal from the mold to provide the cavity filter structure.
In a preferred embodiment, the one or more layers of laminate comprise multiple layers of laminate where each layer of laminate has a thermal expansion coefficient opposite to that of an adjacent layer of laminate. The total thickness of the one or more layers of metal is preferably approximately 10 micrometers. The mold preferably comprises a conductive mold, and the depositing one or more layers of metal preferably comprises depositing a layer of metal employing an electroplating process. The mold may alternatively comprise an insulating mold, and the depositing one or more layers of metal further comprises depositing a first layer of metal employing an electro-less plating process, and depositing a second layer of metal employing an electro-plating process. The first layer of metal may preferably comprise copper and the second layer of metal may preferably comprise silver.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a cavity filter structure produced by a process as follows. The process comprises the steps of providing a mold having a contoured surface inversely shaped to that of a cavity filter structure, and depositing one or more layers of metal onto the mold, the one or more layers of the metal having a total thickness on the order of one to several times the skin depth associated with the operating radio frequency of the cavity filter structure. The process further comprises depositing one or more layers of laminate onto the layer of metal, where the one or more layers of laminate is adapted for providing mechanical support to the cavity filter structure, and separating the one or more layers of metal from the mold to provide the cavity filter structure.
In a preferred embodiment, the one or more layers of laminate preferably comprise multiple layers of laminate where each layer of laminate has a thermal expansion coefficient opposite to that of an adjacent layer of laminate. The total thickness of the one or more layers of metal is preferably approximately 10 micrometers. The mold preferably comprises a conductive mold, and the depositing one or more layers of metal preferably comprises depositing a layer of metal employing an electroplating process. The mold may alternatively comprise an insulating mold, and the depositing one or more layers of metal further comprises depositing a first layer of metal employing an electro-less plating process, and depositing a second layer of metal employing an electro-plating process.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a lightweight cavity resonator filter, comprising a metal shell having an exposed contoured surface of a cavity filter structure, the metal shell having a thickness on the general order of magnitude of the skin depth associated with the operating radio frequency of the cavity filter structure, and multiple layers of laminate coupled to the metal shell, where each layer of laminate has a thermal expansion coefficient opposite to that of an adjacent layer of laminate where in some embodiments one of the expansion coefficients is positive and the other expansion coefficient is negative.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a method for forming a lightweight cavity filter structure comprising providing an insulated housing having a contoured surface of a cavity filter structure, depositing a first layer of metal onto the insulated housing employing an electro-less plating process, and depositing a second layer of metal onto the first layer of metal employing an electroplating process. The total thickness of the first and second layers of metal is on the general order of magnitude of the skin depth associated with the operating radio frequency of the cavity filter structure.
In a preferred embodiment, the total thickness of the first and second layers of metal is approximately 10 micrometers. The insulated housing may preferably comprise polystyrene. The first layer of metal may preferably comprise copper and the second layer of metal may preferably comprise silver.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a cavity filter structure produced by a process comprising the steps of providing an insulated housing having a contoured surface of a cavity filter structure, depositing a first layer of metal onto the insulated housing employing an electro-less plating process, and depositing a second layer of metal onto the first layer of metal employing an electroplating process. The total thickness of the first and second layers of metal is on the general order of magnitude of the skin depth associated with the operating radio frequency of the cavity filter structure.
In a preferred embodiment, the total thickness of the first and second layers of metal is approximately 10 micrometers. The insulated housing may preferably comprise polystyrene. The first layer of metal may preferably comprise copper and the second layer of metal may preferably comprise silver.
Further features and aspects of the invention are set out in the following detailed description.
The mechanical structure of a conventional cavity based filter/duplexer housing 101 shown in
Within this disclosure, reference to various metal deposition processes including electro-less deposition and electroplating will be used as specific examples of implementations in one or more embodiments. As used herein and consistent with well known terminology in the art, electro-less plating generally refers to a plating process which occurs without the use of external electrical power. Electroplating generally refers to a process which uses an electrical current to deposit material on a conductive object. However, the use of the these specific plating processes should not be taken as being limited in nature as the methods disclosed herein may be practiced with other metal deposition techniques known in the art. Furthermore, various intermediate processing steps know in the art such as, but not limited to, pretreatment, cleaning, surface preparation, masking, and the use of additional layers to facilitate separation or adhesion between adjacent layers may not have been explicitly disclosed for the purposes of clarity but may be employed in one or more embodiments.
Moreover, as used throughout this disclosure, the various cross-sectional views of the layered structures during the fabrication process and the resulting cavity filter structures are representations to illustrate the cross-sectional views and may not necessarily be to scale.
Embodiments relate to novel approaches for the design and fabrication of filters similar, but not limited to the structures described herein and above. Embodiments accordingly also include improved filter structures. The electrical performance of filter structures like those discussed above is very much dependent on the electrical properties of the surface material. Thus, while the surface losses are critical, the cavity wall thickness is of less significance to the extent that, while it helps achieve the desired mechanical rigidity, it is responsible for a disproportionate weight of the finished product. Therefore, in order to reduce the weight of the filter structure, the cavity wall density would need to be reduced substantially. This is to say that the mass per unit volume of the filter structure can be reduced considerably if the filter structure is formed by a controlled electro-deposition process. Details of this process will be discussed in some detail in following sections.
Embodiments provide a method and apparatus for low cost fabrication of a single or multi-mode cavity filter leading to a lightweight structure. Before a detailed discussion of one or more embodiments is presented, the relevant electrical theory will be described first.
It is well known to those with ordinary skill in the art that an AC signal penetrates into a conductor by a limited amount, normally penetrating by only a few skin depths. The skin depth by definition is defined as the depth below the surface of the conductor at which the current density has fallen to 1/e (i.e., about 0.37) of the current density. In other words, the electrical energy conduction role of the conductor is restricted to a very small depth from its surface. Therefore, the rest of the body of the conductor, and in the case of a cavity resonator, the bulk of the wall, does not contribute to the conduction.
The general formulae for calculating skin depth is given in equation (1)
where
ρ is resistivity (Ohm-meters),
f=frequency (Hz), and
μ0=4π×107.
From equation (1) it is evident that the skin depth is inversely proportional to signal frequency. At RF and microwave frequencies, the current only penetrates the wave-guiding walls by a few skin depths. The skin depth for a silver plated conductor supporting a signal at 1 GHz is 2.01 μm. For copper the figure is very close (2.48 μm). Hence while the actual wave-guiding walls are a few millimeters thick, the required thickness of the electrical wall is in the order of 10 μm.
Based on the previous discussions, the electrical performance of the filter structure and, indeed, any conducting structure supporting radio frequency signal can have a much reduced conductor thickness without an impact on their electrical characteristics (such as resonator Q-factors and transmission coefficients).
Embodiments are based on utilizing this property of an electrical conductor. The conventional method of manufacturing cavity filters relies on machining or casting a solid bulk of aluminum or copper and plating the conducting surfaces by electroplating copper or silver. A typical cavity filter is constructed using a structural base metal (e.g., aluminum, steel, invar etc.) plated with copper followed by silver. The plated layer is normally several skin-depths thick. The bulk of the structure serves as a structural support providing mechanical rigidity and thermal stability. It is of course possible to cast the filter structure and electroplate subsequently to achieve the same end result.
One or more embodiments provide a fabrication method in which the filter structure is formed by electroplating over a mold or a former that is a mirror image of the cavity structure(s). This can be achieved by machining or casting a former out of a metal structure that serves as the cathode in the electroplating process. The plated layer is several skin-depths thick. Beyond what is required to satisfy the electrical conductions, an additional plating laminate will improve the mechanical strength at the expense of added weight. The electroplated cavity structure can include the coaxial resonator, or provision for bolt in resonators (either coaxial or dielectric).
The electro-plated metal 222 may then be separated from the metal mold 220 to form a shell similar to that shown in cavity filter 230 comprising the electro-plated metal 222 and the laminate 224. While not explicitly described above for the purposes of clarity, additional steps may be employed to enable the separation of the electro-plated metal 222 from the mold 220. Such additional steps may include coating the mold 220 with a sacrificial layer which may be etched, liquefied, or dissolved to facilitate the separation of the electroplated metal 222 from the mold 220.
One or more embodiments provide a method of depositing several different layers with opposing thermal expansion rate to prevent the undesirable thermal expansion of the cavity dimensions.
As shown in
Another embodiment provides that the former may be made out of a metal of a non-metallic (insulator) material that is used as the cathode in the electroforming process but after an electro-less deposition process.
In an embodiment, one or layers of laminate 324 are applied to the electroplated metal 322 as illustrated in
As shown in
In an embodiment, yet another fabrication method is to mold the actual filter structure (the negative of what is shown in
A layer of electro-less deposited metal 421 is deposited on the insulating material 420 as discussed above and shown in
As shown in
An embodiment provides related mechanical reinforcement of the electro-deposited filter shell. The ultra light filter structure formed by electroplating may suffer from insufficient mechanical rigidity. The structure is then filled by reinforcing foam. A variety of filler options are available for this task. This embodiment is not limited to a filler material and other metal or non-metal reinforcement structures are also claimed.
An embodiment provides the provision of reinforcing the plated cavity structure by insertion of a reinforcement structure before the plating. The reinforcing structure can be fused with the electrodeposited structure, adding mechanical strength and stability.
An embodiment relates to the method of reinforcing the overall structure by adding, welding, or brazing additional plates or laminates to the structure to achieve mechanical strength while minimizing the added weight.
An embodiment of invention extends the application of technique described above to other radio subsystems such as antennas, antenna array structures, integrated antenna array-filter/duplexer structures and active antenna arrays.
The foregoing descriptions of preferred embodiments of the invention are purely illustrative and are not meant to be limiting in nature. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that a variety of modifications are possible while remaining within the scope of the present invention.
The present invention has been described primarily as methods and structures for fabricating lightweight cavity filter structures. In this regard, the methods and structures for fabricating lightweight cavity filter structures are presented for purposes of illustration and description. Furthermore, the description is not intended to limit the invention to the form disclosed herein. Accordingly, variants and modifications consistent with the following teachings, skill, and knowledge of the relevant art, are within the scope of the present invention. The embodiments described herein are further intended to explain modes known for practicing the invention disclosed herewith and to enable others skilled in the art to utilize the invention in equivalent, or alternative embodiments and with various modifications considered necessary by the particular application(s) or use(s) of the present invention.
The present application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/466,312 filed Mar. 22, 2011, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2565643 | Baddour | Aug 1951 | A |
4259561 | Roussy | Mar 1981 | A |
4265690 | Lowenhar | May 1981 | A |
4523162 | Johnson | Jun 1985 | A |
4677402 | Cesani | Jun 1987 | A |
5329687 | Scott et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5894250 | Ravaska et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5993934 | Reese et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6036815 | Peterson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6148221 | Ishikawa | Nov 2000 | A |
6900708 | White et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7471172 | Holst et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7847658 | Lyons | Dec 2010 | B2 |
9312594 | Burke et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
20010030587 | Wulff | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20090027403 | Jung | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090302974 | Lyons et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100045406 | Andreasson | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100328325 | Sevigny et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110030197 | Lagrotta et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120149464 | Bone et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130016025 | Burke et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1137842 | Dec 1996 | CN |
102046710 | May 2011 | CN |
102214852 | Oct 2011 | CN |
202977669 | Jun 2013 | CN |
104521062 | Apr 2015 | CN |
WO-201097178 | Jul 2012 | WO |
WO-2013141897 | Sep 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Search Authority for related PCT application serial No. PCT/US2012/057141, Feb. 5, 2013, 5 pp. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/626,700, Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 14, 2015”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/626,700, Response filed Jul. 14, 2015 to Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 14, 2015”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/626,700, Response to Restriction Requirement mailed Jan. 16, 2015”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/626,700, Restriction Requirement mailed Jan. 16, 2015”, 8 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 12871637.0, Office Action mailed Nov. 14, 2014”, 1 pg. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/057141, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Oct. 2, 2014”, 10 pgs. |
Harel, J. P., et al., “Foam technology for integration of millimetre-wave 3D functions”, Electronics Letters Oct. 14, 1999 vol. 35 No. 21, (1999), 1853-1854. |
Lohinetong, et al., “Surface Mounted Millimeter Waveguide Devices Based on Metallized Dielectric Foam or Plastic Materials”, IEEE, (2005), 1409-1412. |
Lohinetong, D., et al., “Microstrip To Surface Mounted Foam-Based Waveguide Transition for Ka-Band Filter Integration”, IEEE 2004 4' International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology Proceedings, (2004), 899-902. |
Mueller, Thomas, “SMD-type 42 GHz waveguide filter”, IEEE MTT-S Digest; Weid-6, (2003), 1089-1093. |
Person, Christian, et al., “Co-integration of filters and waveguide to microstrip transitions using the foam technology”, 33rd European Microwave Conference—Munich 2003, (2003), 435-438. |
“U.S. Appl. No, 13/626,700, Corrected Notice of Allowability mailed Dec. 15, 2015”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/626,700, Ex Parte Quayle Action mailed Sep. 8, 2015”, (Sep. 8, 2015), 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No, 13/626,700, Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 25, 2015”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/626,700, Response filed Nov. 6, 2015 to Ex-Parte Quale Action mailed Sep. 8, 2015”, 30 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201280073379,8, Office Action mailed Feb. 1, 2016”, W/ English Translation, 23 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 12871637.0, Amendment filed Oct. 21, 2014”, 11 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 12871637.0, Extended European Search Report mailed Feb. 15, 2016”, 12 pgs. |
Liberatoscioli, S, et al., “Innovative manufacturing technology for RF Passive devices combining electroforming and CFRP application”, IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, (Jun. 2008), 743-746. |
Ma, Z, et al., “Microwave cavity resonators using hard X-ray Lithography”, Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 47(4), (Nov. 2005), 353-357. |
Varlese, Steven J, “Performance Characterization of a Shape Memory Composite Mirror”, Proceedings 0f Spie vol. 5899, (Aug. 18, 2005), 58990Y-58990Y-9. |
Vicenti, A, et al., “Tailoring Expansion Coefficients of Laminates: A New General Optimal Approach Based upon the Polar-Genetic Method”, 6th World Congresses of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optirnization9, (May 30, 2005), 10 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120242425 A1 | Sep 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61466312 | Mar 2011 | US |