Linear ethylene interpolymer blends of interpolymers having narrow molecular weight and composition distributions

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to polymer blends of crystalline interpolymers, such as linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE), and more particularly to blends of such interpolymers wherein each blend component has a narrow molecular weight distribution and a narrow composition distribution selected to obtain superior properties in the blend.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Various types of polyethylene are known in the art. Low density polyethylene ("LDPE") is generally prepared at high pressure using free radical initiators and typically has a density in the range of 0.915-0.940 g/cm.sup.3. LDPE is also known as "branched" polyethylene because of the relatively large number of long chain branches extending from the main polymer backbone.
High density polyethylene ("HDPE") usually has a density in the range of greater than 0.940 to 0.960 g/cm.sup.3. HDPE is prepared using a coordination catalyst, e.g. Ziegler-Natta type catalysts, at low or moderate pressures, but sometimes at high pressure. HDPE is generally linear without any substantial side chain branching. HDPE is a substantially crystalline polymer.
Linear low density polyethylene ("LLDPE") is generally prepared in the same manner as HDPE, but incorporates a relatively minor amount of an alpha-olefin comonomer such as butene, hexene or octene to introduce enough short chain branches into the otherwise linear polymer to reduce the density of the resultant polymer into the range of that of LDPE. Introducing larger concentrations of comonomer can also reduce the density of the ethylene interpolymers into the 0.900 to 0.915 g/cm range of very low density polyethylene (VLDPE) and in the "plastomer range" (i.e. 0.88-0.90 g/cm.sup.3).
The coordination catalysts used to interpolymerize ethylene and the alpha-olefin generally produce an LLDPE with a relatively broad weight molecular weight distribution, i.e., Mw/Mn greater than about 3. Such LLDPE's also have relatively broad compositions in that the proportion of alpha-olefin comonomer molecules incorporated into the polymer molecules varies. Generally, the lower molecular weight polymer molecules contain a relatively higher proportion of the alpha-olefin comonomer than the higher molecular weight polymer molecules.
A polyethylene such as LLDPE having a broad molecular weight distribution is undesirable in many respects, depending on the desired end use application. For example, LLDPE resins known in the prior art containing relatively high molecular weight molecules are subject to orientation which results in anisotropic properties in the machine versus transverse direction of a fabrication process. On the other hand, LLDPE resins containing relatively lower molecular weight molecules, in which the comonomer is invariably concentrated, tend to exhibit high block and tackiness in fabricated films. These lower molecular weight, highly branched molecules interfere with the proper function of certain additives compounded in the resin, increase the percentage of extractable polymer, and increase fouling in the polymerization plant. The relatively high alpha-olefin comonomer content of these low molecular weight polymer molecules causes such polymer molecules to be generally amorphous and to exude to the surface of fabricated parts, thereby producing an undesirable sticky surface. Prior art polyethylenes such as LLDPE also generally tend to have a very broad, non-uniform distribution of comonomer content, i.e. some polymer molecules have a relatively high alpha-olefin comonomer content while others have a relatively low content. Generally, the polymer molecules of low comonomer content are relatively more crystalline and have a high melting temperature, whereas the high comonomer content polymer molecules are more amorphous and melt at a lower temperature. The presence of a higher melting component is disadvantageous in many applications, for example where softness or clarity is desired. On the other hand, the presence of a lower melting component frequently results in a high quantity of extractables, which limit food contact applications. Prior art blends of polyethylenes designed to improve one or more of the properties of the blend relative to its blend components or prior art polyethylene have also suffered from the drawbacks mentioned above. For example, incorporating a blend component with a high average comonomer content to reduce crystallizability generally results in an increase of extractables and adversely affects other properties so that the full advantage of the blend is not realized. U.S. Pat. No. 4,438,238 to Fukushima, et al. is directed to blends comprised of two ethylene alpha-olefin copolymers. These blend components were made with traditional Ziegler-Natta catalysts, and they have wide molecular weight distribution and wide composition distribution compared to the blend components of this invention. The narrow molecular weight distribution and composition of the blend components of this invention leads to blends having precisely tailored molecular structure and properties that are markedly superior to those of prior art polyethylene plastics.
Blending has also been used to improve properties of elastomers. U.S. Pat. No. 4,786,697 and 4,789,714 to Cozewith, et al. are directed toward non-crystalline copolymers of ethylene in elastomeric applications. The Cozewith polymers are amorphous copolymers having narrow molecular weight distribution (M.sub.w /M.sub.n less than 2.0); relatively low concentrations of ethylene to minimize crystallinity; and a non-random, tapered intra-molecular distribution of ethylene and comonomer. Such copolymers were used to make rubber blends that had good curing and compounding characteristics. In contrast, the interpolymer blend components of this present invention are crystalline materials having high ethylene concentrations where the comonomer is randomly distributed along the polymer backbone chain., random (non-tapered) molecules having high ethylene concentrations, and the blends of these components are plastics rather than rubbers. Thus, there is a need to provide ethylene interpolymer blends with superior properties and in which the full advantages of blending may be realized.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a blend of ethylene interpolymer components with narrow molecular weight and composition distributions selected to obtain an overall molecular weight and composition distribution in the resulting blend to impart superior properties thereto. Broadly, the blends of this invention comprise a plurality of linear ethylene interpolymer components wherein each component has a M.sub.w /M.sub.n value less than or equal to 3 and a composition distribution breadth index (as later described) of 50% or higher. The blend is substantially free of blend components having both a higher average molecular weight and a lower average comonomer content than that of any other polyethylene component in the blend. The components for the blend can be selected so that the resultant blend has plural modality with respect to molecular weight distribution, comonomer content, or both.
In another aspect, the components for the blend are linear ethylene interpolymers having the narrow molecular weight and composition distributions mentioned above and the blend components are selected from one of the groups consisting of: (1) linear ethylene interpolymer blend components having substantially the same average molecular weight but different average comonomer contents; (2) linear ethylene interpolymer blend components having substantially the same average comonomer content but different average molecular weights; and (3) linear ethylene interpolymer blend components having different average molecular weights and comonomer contents in which the blend components, taken serially in order of increasing average molecular weight, have an increasing comonomer content.
In still another aspect, the linear ethylene interpolymer blend components have the narrow molecular weight and composition distribution mentioned above, and for the linear ethylene interpolymer blend components taken serially in order of increasing average molecular weight, then each succeeding component has substantially the same or a higher average comonomer content than each preceding component in said series.
In another aspect, the invention provides a linear ethylene interpolymer having plural modality with respect to comonomer content, a narrow molecular weight distribution such that M.sub.w /M.sub.n <3 and an overall composition distribution breadth index less than 50%.
In still another aspect, the invention provides a linear ethylene interpolymer having plural modality with respect to molecular weight so that the blend has broad overall molecular weight distribution such that M.sub.w /M.sub.n >3 and a composition distribution breadth index greater than or equal to 50%.
In still another aspect, the invention provides a linear ethylene interpolymer of plural modality with respect to both comonomer content and molecular weight, comprising a plurality of fractions having a narrow molecular weight distribution such that M.sub.w /M.sub.n <3 for each fraction and each fraction, taken serially in order of increasing average molecular weight, has an increasing average comonomer content.
In a still further aspect of the invention, there is provided a linear ethylene interpolymer blend of plural modality with respect to both comonomer content and molecular weight which comprises a plurality of fractions having a composition distribution breadth index of 50% or more, wherein the fractions, taken serially in order of increasing comonomer content, have an increasing average molecular weight.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of different blends made from poly(ethylene-co-alpha-olefin) blend components having narrow molecular weight and composition distributions.
FIG. 2 illustrates the broad molecular weight distribution and broad composition distribution of a typical prior an LLDPE.
FIG. 3 illustrates the narrow molecular weight distribution and narrow composition distribution of an exemplary blend component used in the present invention.
FIG. 4 illustrates the molecular weight distribution and composition distribution of an exemplary LLDPE blend according to an embodiment of the invention in which the blend components have about the same molecular weight but differing comonomer contents.
FIG. 5 illustrates the molecular weight distribution and composition distribution of an exemplary LLDPE blend according to another embodiment of the invention in which the blend components have about the same comonomer content but differing molecular weights.
FIG. 6 illustrates the molecular weight distribution and composition distribution of an exemplary LLDPE blend according to yet another embodiment of the invention in which the comonomer contents of the blend components increases as the molecular weight increases.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The linear ethylene interpolymer blend components in the present invention are higher interpolymers of a major proportion of ethylene and a minor proportion of comonomer. The ethylene is generally polymerized in a proportion of 70-100, typically 70-99, and often 70-80, 80-90 or 90-95, mole percent of the interpolymerized monomers with 1-30, typically 3-30, and often 20-30, 10-20 or 5-10, mole percent comonomer. Contemplated blend components generally include plastomer blend components in the density range of about 0.88-0.900 g/cm.sup.3, very low density polyethylene blend components in the density range of about 0.900-0.915 g/cm.sup.3, and linear, low density polyethylene blend components in the density range of about 0.915-0.940 g/cm.sup.3. Ethylene interpolymers having a density in the high density polyethylene range above about 0.940 g/cm.sup.3 are also contemplated as being suitably employed in the invention.
Suitable comonomers interpolymerized with the ethylene to obtain the ethylene interpolymer blend components herein generally include monomers which may be copolymerized with ethylene to obtain the molecular weight distribution and comonomer distribution desired in the blend component. A preferred class of comonomers are the alpha-olefins having 3 to about 12 carbon atoms, such as propylene, 1-butene, 1-pentene, 1-hexene, 3-methyl-1-pentene, 4-methyl-1-pentene, 1-octene, 1-decene, 1-dodecane and the like, including vinyl cyclohexane, norbornene, vinyl cyclohexene, and other diene comonomers such as 1,3-butadiene, 1,4-hexadiene, 4-methyl- 1,4-hexadiene, 5-methyl-1,4-hexadiene, 1,5-hexadiene and the like. The ethylene interpolymer may include one or more of such comonomers, i.e. it may be a copolymer, terpolymer, etc.
The molecular weight of the LLDPE blend components may range from one thousand to one million or more depending on the particular end use, preferably 10.sup.4 -10.sup.6, and especially 2.times.10.sup.4 -5.times.10.sup.5. As used herein, the terms "average molecular weight" and "molecular weight" refer to weight average molecular weight unless otherwise indicated. The linear polyethylene blend components preferably have a narrow molecular weight distribution (MWD). By "narrow MWD" is meant that the ratio of the weight average molecular weight (M.sub.w) to the number average molecular weight (M.sub.n) is less than or equal to 3.0. Particularly preferred are the linear polyethylene blend components having a very narrow MWD, i.e. M.sub.w /M.sub.n less than or equal to 2.5, and especially less than or equal to 2.0. Molecular weight distributions of ethylene interpolymers are readily determined by techniques known in the art, such as, for example, size exclusion chromatography.
The linear polyethylene blend components preferably have a composition distribution (CD) such that the composition distribution breadth index (CDBI) is at least 50%.
CDBI is a measure of composition distribution. CDBI is defined as the weight percent of the copolymer molecules having a comonomer content within 50% (that is, 25% on each side) of the median total molar comonomer content. The CDBI of a copolymer is readily determined utilizing well known techniques for isolating individual fractions of a sample of the copolymer. One such technique is Temperature Rising Elation Fraction (TREF), as described in Wild, et al., J. Poly. Sci, Poly. Phys. Ed., vol. 20, p. 441 (1982), which is incorporated herein by reference.
To determine CDBI, a solubility distribution curve is first generated for the copolymer. This may be accomplished using data acquired from TREF techniques described above. This solubility distribution curve is a plot of the weight fraction of the copolymer that is solubilized as a function of temperature. This is converted to a weight fraction versus composition distribution curve. For the purpose of simplifying the correlation of composition with elution temperature the weight fractions less than 15,000 are ignored. These low weight fractions generally represent a trivial portion of the plastomer of the present invention. The remainder of this description and the appended claims maintain this convention of ignoring weight fractions below 15,000 in the CDBI measurements.
From the weight fraction versus composition distribution curve the CDBI is determined by establishing what weight percent of the sample has comonomer content within 25% each side of the median comonomer content. Further details of determining CDBI of a copolymer are known to those skilled in the art, see, for example, PCT Patent Application WO 93/03093, published Feb. 18, 1993.
Unless otherwise indicated, terms such as "comonomer content", "average comonomer content" and the like refer to the bulk comonomer content of the indicated interpolymer blend, blend component or fraction on a molar basis.
A graphical illustration of an exemplary narrow MWD, narrow CD blend component is seen in FIG. 3. In this three-dimensional figure, the Y-axis is the molecular weight, the X-axis is the molar comonomer content, and the Z-axis represents the incidence or weight proportion of molecules. As can be seen, the MWD and the CD of the blend component are narrow and appear as relatively sharp peaks in FIG. 3. In contrast, the MWD/CD diagram for a typical conventional LLDPE seen in FIG. 2 shows a broad MWD and a broad CD, and the comonomer content tends to decrease as the molecular weight increases.
In the blends of the present invention, one or more of the properties of the blend are improved by appropriate selection of narrow MWD, narrow CD blend components. In one embodiment, for example, tear strength may be controlled by blending linear polyethylene resins having about the same average molecular weight but with different average comonomer contents. Such a blend is illustrated as line B in FIG. 1. In another embodiment, the comonomer contents of the linear polyethylene blend components are the same, but molecular weights are varied, as illustrated by line C in FIG. 1. In still further embodiments illustrated by lines D, E and F in FIG. 1, the blend components taken serially in order of increasing molecular weight, or in order of increasing molar comonomer content, have the same or higher comonomer content or molecular weight, respectively.
As used herein, two or more blend components have substantially the same molecular weight if the resulting MWD of the blend thereof is similarly narrow to the MWD of each blend component, i.e. the value of M.sub.w /M.sub.n of the resulting blend is less than or equal to about 3.0, preferably less than about 2.5. Conversely, two or more blend components have a different average molecular weight if the overall M.sub.w /M.sub.n of the resulting blend is relatively greater than for each such blend component, i.e., the M.sub.w /M.sub.n of the blend is greater than 3.0. As used herein, two or more blend components have a different comonomer content if the overall CDBI of the resulting blend is relatively less than that of each such blend component, i.e., the overall CDBI of the blend is less than 50%. Conversely, two or more blend components have substantially the same molar comonomer content if the resulting CD of the blend thereof is similarly narrow with respect to each blend component, i.e., the resulting blend has a CDBI of 50% or greater. It is readily appreciated that the CD and MWD of a blend can depend on the relative proportions of each blend component employed therein. It is specifically contemplated that blend components may have the "same" molecular weight for purposes of one blend, but not for the purpose of another blend, e.g. wherein the components would result in the blend having an MWD less than or greater than 3.0 depending on the proportion of each blend component. Similarly, blend components may have a "different" comonomer content for purposes of one blend, but not for the purposes of another blend, e.g. wherein the components would result in the final blend having CDBI less than or greater than 50% depending on the proportion of each blend component. The molecular weight and composition distribution of a bimodal blend of the invention is illustrated graphically in FIG. 4. It is seen from this MWD/CD diagram that the comonomer content of each of the blend components is different, while the molecular weight of each blend component is about the same. This blend corresponds to line B of FIG. 1. In contrast, a similar graph for typical conventional LLDPE is seen in FIG. 2, and line A of FIG. 1, and shows that the lower molecular weight fractions contain more of the comonomer than the higher molecular weight fractions. The lower molecular weight molecules which contain relatively high comonomer concentrations as in this conventional LLDPE can cause undesirable effects such as poor surface properties, high block and tackiness, cling development, high levels of extractables, and fouling of polymerization plants. In the present invention, such effects are minimized and properties are enhanced by providing blends of the type illustrated in Curve B, C, D, E, and F.
As an example of the embodiment of Curve B, it has been found that a 50-50 blend of a first LLDPE having a 6.4 mole % 1-butene content and a Mw of 80,400 (M.sub.w /M.sub.n =2.3; CDBI=.about.67%; MI 4.0 dg/min; density 0.9042 g/cm.sup.3) with a HDPE having a 0.0 mole % 1-butene content and a M.sub.w of 76,700 (M.sub.w /M.sub.n =2.8; CDBI=.about.100%; MI 5.0 dg/min; density 0.9552 g/cm.sup.3) has an Elmendorf tear strength of 210 g/mil, synergistically enhanced in contrast to the tear strengths of 111 and 48 g/mil for the respective first and second blend components. Further, a 25-75 blend of these same components has a further enhanced Elmendorf tear strength of 227 g/mil. This result is quite surprising and unexpected because including a higher proportion of the second LLDPE resin with the lower tear strength in the blend increases the tear strength of the resulting blend, rather than decreasing the tear strength as would be expected.
In another embodiment exemplified in FIG. 5 and line C of FIG. 1, a multimodal MWD is obtained by blending linear polyethylene components having narrow molecular weight and composition distributions, and about the same comonomer content, but differing molecular weights. The molecular weight distribution of such blends improves the melt processability and rheological characteristics thereof, for example, high extrusion rates, high bubble stability, high shear sensitivity, reduced draw resonance. On the other hand, the optical properties of mechanical, surface and individual blend components are generally substantially retained or improved in the blend thereof, including, for example tear strength, modulus, yield strength, reduced blocking, clarity, gloss, haze and the like. Moreover, such blends have lower portions of soluble molecules than prior art copolymers having similar molecular weight distribution. Desirable molecular weight and composition distributions may be obtained by blending different components, or by polymerization of the blend components simultaneously in the same reactor or in multiple reactors.
The higher molecular weight fraction containing relatively less comonomer as in conventional LLDPE may cause an anisotropic morphology during fabrication processing known as "row nucleated" or "shish-ka-bob" morphology. This anisotropic morphology is believed to contribute to poor toughness in articles crystallized from flowing melts. In the present invention, the anisotropy may be minimized by providing a blend with lower concentrations of such higher molecular weight molecules with a relatively low comonomer content and by incorporating the comonomer in the blend components as indicated in blend B, C, D, E and F.
In another embodiment as exemplified by FIG. 5 and line D of FIG. 1, the blend includes components having narrow molecular weight and composition distributions, but differing average molecular weights and average comonomer contents. However, in contrast to conventional LLDPE as illustrated in line A of FIG. 1 and in FIG. 2, the blend of this embodiment has a greater comonomer content in the higher molecular weight fractions or blend components than in the lower molecular weight fractions or blend components. These distributions are obtained, for example, by blending narrow MWD, narrow CD linear polyethylene resins which, taken serially in order of increasing molecular weight, have an increasing comonomer content. It is also contemplated that the blend may include two or more blend components having the same molecular weight as illustrated by line F in FIG. 1, in which case such components would be included in the serial ordering secondarily in order of their increasing average comonomer content. Also, the presence of two or more blend components having the same comonomer content is also contemplated as being within the purview of this embodiment, as illustrated by line E in FIG. 1, provided that there is included either at least one blend component having a higher comonomer content and molecular weight or at least one blend component having a lower comonomer content and lower molecular weight than any of the blend components having the same comonomer content. In this embodiment, the blend is preferably substantially free of blend components having both a higher molecular weight and a lower comonomer content than any component present in the blend.
Such a blend has properties which are significantly different from prior art blends and conventional LLDPE resins in which the comonomer content generally decreases in proportion to increasing molecular weight components or fractions. The isotropy and toughness of films made from such blends are improved by minimizing the anisotropic shish-ka-bob or row-nucleated morphology ordinarily caused by a low concentration of comonomers present in the higher molecular weight molecules in conventional LLDPE resins. Moreover, such blends have desirable properties such as, for example, reduced blocking, reduced coefficients of friction, and lower extractables, in comparison to conventional LLDPE resins. The linear polyethylene blend components of the invention may be prepared by use of catalyst systems of the metallocene type known to provide narrow CD/MWD resins. Cyclopentadienylide catalyst systems using a metallocene complex in conjunction with an alumoxane cocatalyst or reaction product thereof are suitable for preparing the polymer components utilized in the blends of the invention. "Metallocene" catalysts are herein defined to contain one or more cyclopentadienyl moiety in combination with a transition metal. Such catalyst systems using a metallocene complex in conjunction with an alumoxane cocatalyst or reaction product thereof are suitable for preparing the polymer components utilized in the blends of the invention. The metallocene catalyst may be represented by the general formula (C.sub.p).sub.m MR.sub.n R'.sub.p wherein C.sub.p is a substituted or unsubstituted cyclopentadienyl ring; M is a Group IVB, [or] VB or VIB transition metal; R and R' are independently selected halogen, hydrocarbyl group, or hydrocarboxyl groups having 1- 20 carbon atoms; m=1-3, n=0-3, p=0-3, and the sum of m+n+p equals the oxidation state of M. Various forms of the catalyst system of the metallocene type may be used for polymerization to prepare the polymer components of the present invention including those of the homogenous or the heterogeneous, supported catalyst type wherein the catalyst and alumoxane cocatalyst are together supported or reacted together onto an inert support for polymerization by gas-phase, high pressure, slurry, or solution polymerization. The metallocene catalysts are also highly flexible. By manipulating the catalyst composition and reaction conditions, the catalyst composition can be made to provide polyolefins with controllable molecular weights from as low as about 200 to about 1 million or higher.
The cyclopentadienyls of the catalyst may be unsubstituted or substituted with hydrogen or hydrocarbyl radicals. The hydrocarbyl radicals may include alkyl, alkenyl, aryl, alkylaryl, arylalkyl, and like radicals containing from about 1-20 carbon atoms or where 2 carbon atoms of cyclopentadienyl are joined together to form a C.sub.4 -C.sub.6 ring. Exemplary hydrocarbyl radicals include methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl, amyl, isoamyl, hexyl, isobutyl, heptyl, octyl, nonyl, decyl, cetyl, 2-ethylhexyl, phenyl and the like. Exemplary halogen substituents include chlorine, bromine, fluorine and iodine. Of these halogen atoms, chlorine is preferred. Exemplary hydrocarboxy radicals are methoxy, ethoxy, propoxy, butoxy, amyloxy and the like. Illustrative, but non-limiting examples of the metallocene catalyst useful in preparing the polymers of the present invention include
bis(cyclopentadienyl)titanium dimethyl,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)titanium diphenyl,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)zirconium dimethyl,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)zirconium diphenyl,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)hafnium dimethyl and diphenyl,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)titanium di-neopentyl,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)zirconium di-neopentyl,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)titanium dibenzyl,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)zirconium dibenzyl,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)vanadium dimethyl;
the mono alkyl metallocenes such as
bis(cyclopentadienyl)titanium methyl chloride,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)titanium ethyl chloride,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)titanium phenyl chloride,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)zirconium methyl chloride,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)zirconium ethyl chloride,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)zirconium phenyl chloride,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)titanium methyl bromide,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)titanium methyl iodide,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)titanium ethyl bromide,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)titanium ethyl iodide,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)titanium phenyl bromide,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)titanium phenyl iodide,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)zirconium methyl bromide,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)zirconium methyl iodide,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)zirconium ethyl bromide,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)zirconium ethyl iodide,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)zirconium phenyl bromide,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)zirconium phenyl iodide;
the trialkyl metallocenes such as
cyclopentadienyltitanium trimethyl,
cyclopentadienyl zirconium triphenyl, and
cyclopentadienyl zirconium trineopentyl,
cyclopentadienylzirconium trimethyl,
cyclopentadienylhafnium triphenyl,
cyclopentadienylhafnium trineopentyl, and
cyclopentadienylhafnium trimethyl.
Other metallocenes which may be usefully employed to prepare the polymer components of the invention include the monocyclopentadienyls titanocenes such as, pentamethylcyclopentadienyl titanium trichloride, pentaethylcyclopentadienyl titanium trichloride; bis(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) titanium diphenyl, the carbene represented by the formula bis(cyclopentadienyl)titanium.dbd.CH.sub.2 and derivatives of this reagent such as bis(cyclopentadienyl)Ti.dbd.CH.sub.2.Al(CH.sub.3).sub.3, (Cp.sub.2 TiCH.sub.2).sub.2, Cp.sub.2 TiCH.sub.2 CH(CH.sub.3)CH.sub.2, Cp.sub.2 Ti--CHCH.sub.2 CH.sub.2 ; substituted bis(cyclopentadienyl)titanium (IV) compounds such as: bis(indenyl)titanium diphenyl or dichloride, bis(methylcyclopentadienyl)titanium diphenyl or dihalides; dialkyl, trialkyl, tetra-alkyl and penta-alkyl cyclopentadienyl titanium compounds such as bis(1,2-dimethylcyclopentadienyl)titanium diphenyl or dichloride, bis(1,2-diethylcyclopentadienyl)titanium diphenyl or dichloride and other dihalide complexes; silicon, phosphine, amine or carbon bridged cyclopentadiene complexes, such as dimethyl silyldicyclopentadienyl titanium diphenyl or dichloride, methyl phosphine dicyclopentadienyl titanium diphenyl or dichloride, methylenedicyclopentadienyl titanium diphenyl or dichloride and other dihalide complexes and the like.
Additional zirconocene catalysts useful according to the present invention include bis(cyclopentadienyl) zirconium dimethyl; bis(cyclopentadienyl) zirconium dichloride, bis(cyclopentadienyl) zirconium methylchloride, pentamethylcyclopentadienyl zirconium trichloride, pentaethylcyclopentadienyl zirconium trichloride, bis(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)zirconium diphenyl, the alkyl substituted cyclopentadienes, such as bis(ethylcyclopentadienyl)zirconium dimethyl, bis(.beta.-phenylpropylcyclopentadienyl)zirconium dimethyl, bis(methylcyclopentadienyl)zirconium dimethyl, bis(n-butyl-cyclopentadienyl)zirconium dimethyl, bis(cyclohexyimethylcyclopentadienyl)zirconium dimethyl, bis(n-octyl-cyclopentadienyl)zirconium dimethyl, and haloalkyl and dihalide complexes of the above; di-alkyl, trialkyl, tetra-alkyl, and penta-alkyl cyclopentadienes, such as bis(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)zirconium di-methyl, bis(1,2-dimethylcyclopentadienyl)zirconium dimethyl and dihalide complexes of the above; silicon, phosphorus, and carbon bridged cyclopentadiene complexes such as dimethylsilyldicyclopentadienyl zirconium dimethyl or dihalide, and methylene dicyclopentadienyl zirconium dimethyl or dihalide, and methylene dicyclopentadienyl ethylene bridged bis(tetrahydroindenyl) zirconium dimethyl or dihalide, carbenes represented by the formula Cp.sub.2 Zr.dbd.CHP(C.sub.6 H.sub.5).sub.2 CH.sub.3, and derivatives of these compounds such as Cp.sub.2 ZrCH.sub.2 CH(CH.sub.3)CH.sub.2.
Bis(cyclopentadienyl)hafnium dichloride, bis(cyclopentadienyl)vanadium dichloride and the like are illustrative of other metallocenes. Exemplary of the development of these metallocene catalysts for the polymerization of ethylene is found in the disclosure of U.S. Pat. No. 4,937,299 to Ewen, et al. and EP-A-0 129 368 published Jul. 26, 1989, both of which have been fully incorporated herein by reference. These publications teach that the structure of the metallocene catalyst includes alumoxane, which is formed when water reacts with trialkyl aluminum resulting in the release of methane. The alumoxane complexes with the metallocene compound to form the catalyst.
The alumoxanes are polymeric aluminum compounds which can be represented by the general formulae (R--Al--O).sub.n which is a cyclic compound and R(R--Al--O--).sub.n AlR.sub.2, which is a linear compound. In the general formula R is a C.sub.1 -C.sub.5 alkyl group such as, for example, methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl and pentyl and n is an integer from 2 to about 20. Generally, in the preparation of alumoxanes from, for example, aluminum trimethyl and water, a mixture of the linear and cyclic compounds is obtained.
The alumoxane can be prepared in various ways. Preferably, they are prepared by contacting water with a solution of aluminum trialkyl, such as, for example, aluminum trimethyl, in a suitable organic solvent such as benzene or an aliphatic hydrocarbon. For example, the aluminum alkyl is treated with water in the form of a moist solvent. In an alternative method, the aluminum alkyl such as aluminum trimethyl can be desirably contacted with a hydrated salt such as hydrated copper sulfate.
Preferably, the alumoxane is prepared in the presence of a hydrated ferrous sulfate as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,665,208. The method comprises treating a dilute solution of aluminum trimethyl in, for example, toluene, with ferrous sulfate represented by the general formula FeSO.sub.4.7H.sub.2 O. The ratio of ferrous sulfate to aluminum trimethyl is desirably about 1 mole of ferrous sulfate for 6 to 7 moles of aluminum trimethyl. The reaction is evidenced by the evolution of methane.
The ratio of aluminum in the alumoxane to total metal in the metallocenes can be in the range of about 0.5:1 to about 10,000:1, and preferably about 5:1 to about 1000:1. However, other cocatalysts may be used with metallocenes, such as trialkylaluminum compounds; or ionizing ionic activators or compounds such as, tri (n-butyl) ammonium tetra(pentaflurophenyl) boron, which ionize the neutral metallocene compound. Such ionizing compounds may contain an active proton, or some other cation associated with but not coordinated or only loosely coordinated to the remaining ion of the ionizing ionic compound. Such compounds are described in EP-A-0 277 003 and EP-A-0 277 004 both published Aug. 3, 1988 and are both herein fully incorporated by reference. Further, the metallocene catalyst component can be a monocyclopentadienyl heteroatom containing compound. This heteroatom is activated by either an alumoxane or an ionic activator to form an active polymerization catalyst system to produce polymers useful in this present invention. These types of catalyst systems are described in, for example, PCT International Publication WO92/00333 published Jan. 9, 1992, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,096,867 and 5,055,438, EP-A-0 420 436 and WO91/04257 all of which are fully incorporated herein by reference. All the catalyst systems described above may be, optionally, prepolymerized or used in conjunction with an additive component to enhance catalytic productivity.
Various inorganic oxide supports may be used for supported catalyst systems to prepare interpolymers and blend components of the present invention. The polymerization is generally carried out in the temperature range of about 0.degree.-160.degree. C., or even higher, but this range is not meant to be exclusive for preparing the interpolymer and blend components of the invention, which may be prepared by any technique resulting in the structure set forth. Atmospheric, sub-atmospheric, or super-atmospheric pressure conditions have been used for the polymerization using the metallocene catalyst described above. It is generally preferred to use catalyst compositions at a concentration so as to provide from about 1 ppm to about 5000 ppm, most preferably 10 ppm to 300 ppm, by weight of transition metal based on the weight of monomers in the polymerization of the ethylene polymers.
A slurry polymerization process generally uses super-atmospheric pressures and temperatures in the range of 40.degree.-110.degree. C. In a slurry polymerization, a suspension of solid, particulate polymer is formed in a liquid polymerization medium to which ethylene and comonomers and often hydrogen along with catalyst are added. The liquid employed in the polymerization medium can be alkane or cycloalkane, or an aromatic hydrocarbon such as toluene, ethylbenzene or xylene. The medium employed should be liquid under the conditions of polymerization and relatively inert. Preferably, hexane or toluene is employed.
In a modification, the polymer components of the present invention may be formed by gas-phase polymerization. A gas-phase process utilizes super-atmospheric pressure and temperatures in the range of about 50.degree.-120.degree. C. Gas-phase polymerization can be performed in a stirred or fluidized bed of catalyst and product particles in a pressure vessel adapted to permit the separation of product particles from unreacted gases. Thermostated ethylene, comonomer, hydrogen and an inert diluent gas such as nitrogen can be introduced or recirculated so as to maintain the particles at a temperature of 50.degree.-120.degree. C. Triethylaluminum may be added as needed as a scavenger of water, oxygen, and other adventitious impurities. Polymer product can be withdrawn continuously or semi-continuously at a rate such as to maintain a constant product inventory in the reactor. After polymerization and deactivation of the catalyst, the product polymer can be recovered by any suitable means. In commercial practice, the polymer product can be recovered directly from the gas phase reactor, freed of residual monomer with a nitrogen purge, and used without further deactivation or catalyst removal. The polymer obtained can be extruded into water and cut into pellets or other suitable comminuted shapes. Pigments, antioxidants and other additives may be added to the polymer, as is known in the art.
The blends of the present invention are prepared by blending the desired components in the desired proportions using conventional blending, techniques and apparatus, such as, for example, screw-type extruders, Banbury mixers, and the like. Alternatively, the blends may be made by direct polymerization, without isolation of the blend components, using, for example, two or more catalysts in one reactor, or by using a single catalyst and two or more reactors in series or parallel. The blend may also be compounded with various conventional additives known in the art such as, for example, antioxidants, UV stabilizers, pigments, fillers, slip additives, block additives, and the like. The blend preferably does not contain any blend components in proportions which would significantly adversely affect any improved properties desired to be obtained by blending the LLDPE resins.
The invention is illustrated by way of the following examples:
EXAMPLE 1
An ethylene homopolymer resin, identified as '006, having characteristics shown in Table 1, was prepared in a gas phase reactor employing a silica supported transition metal catalyst described below.
The gas phase reaction was carried out at 185.degree. F. reaction temperature, 195 psi ethylene pressure, a hydrogen/ethylene mole ratio of 0.00041, and a residence time of 2 hours. A second polymer, an ethylene/butene-1 copolymer identified as '013, having characteristics shown in Table 1 was prepared in the gas phase reactor using the same supported catalyst as described below. The gas phase reaction was carried out at 140.degree. F. reactor temperature, 195 psi ethylene pressure, a hydrogen/ethylene mole ratio of 0.00061, a butene-1/ethylene mole ratio of 0.123, and a residence time of 2 hours.
The silica supported transition metal catalyst was obtained as follows: 100 grams of high surface area (Davison 952) silica, dehydrated in a flow of dry nitrogen at 800.degree. C. for 5 hours, was slurtied with 500 cc of toluene at 25.degree. C. under nitrogen in a 2500 cc round-bottom flask using a magnetic stirrer. 250 cc of methyl alumoxane in toluene (1.03 mole/liter in aluminum) was added dropwise over 15 minutes with constant stirring to the silica slurry. Stirring was continued for 30 minutes while maintaining the temperature at 25.degree. C. To the alumoxane treated silica slurry was added dropwise over 15 minutes, with constant stirring 250.0 cc of toluene solution containing 2.00 grams of bis(n-butylcyclopentadienyl)zirconium dichloride. This slurry was stirred an additional one half hour while maintaining the temperature at 65.degree. C. and thereafter the toluene was decanted and the solids recovered and dried in vacuo for 4 hours. Analysis of the catalyst indicated that it contained 4.5 wt % aluminum and 0.63 wt % zirconium.
Resins '006 and '013 were then intensively mixed at 360.degree. F. in equal proportions in a Banbury melt blender along with 1000 ppm each of the stabilizers Irganox 1076 and Irgafos 168. The molten blend from the Banbury was transferred to a roll mill, made into a thin sheet and then cooled to room temperature. The cold sheet was then chopped into approximately 1/8 inch chips. Characteristics of this blend, identified as Blend B 1, are given in Table 1.
Compression molded sheets, five thousandth of an inch in thickness, were prepared by melting the chopped blend at 160.degree. C. in a press, compressing to 20 tons pressure for 5 minutes and then cooling the blend under pressure to room temperature at a rate of 15.degree. C. per minute. Properties of the molded sheet specimen are shown in Table 2.
EXAMPLE 2
A second compression molded sheet was prepared and tested as in Example 1, from the resins described in Example 1, except that the blend which is identified as Blend B2, consisted of one part '006 and three pans '013. Characteristics of Blend B2 are given in Table 1, properties of Blend B2 are given in Table 2.
TABLE 1______________________________________POLYMER CHARACTERIZATIONSample Mole % Mw/ Den- MeltDesignation Butene.sup.a Mw.sup.b Mn.sup.b sity.sup.c Index.sup.d CDBI.sup.e______________________________________'006 0.0% 76,700 2.8 0.9552 5.0 100%'013 6.4 80,400 2.3 0.9042 4.0 67%Blend A 2.7 76,5000 2.4 0.9335 4.4 25%Blend B 4.9 76,900 2.3 0.9172 4.3 44%______________________________________ .sup.a By C13 NMR .sup.b Weight average molecular weight (Mw), and ratio of number average molecular weight (Mn), Mw/Mn by size exclusion chromatography. .sup.c Density by gradient column method, ASTM D1585, g/cm.sup.3 .sup.d Melt index by ASTM D1738 Condition E, dg/min .sup.e CDBI, composition distribution breadth index, is defined as the weight percent of polymer molecules having a comonomer content within 50% of the median total molar comonomer content CDBI; of HDPE is defined to b 100%. [Determined using temperature rising elution fractionation using tetrachloroethylene solvent over a 6.degree. C. to 120.degree. C. temperature range as described in U.S. Pat. application Ser. No. 151,350. See also Wild, et al, J. Poly. Sci. Ed, Vol. 20, p 441 (1982).
TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________TEAR AND TENSILE STRENGTH OF MOLDED SHEETSample Tear Tensile Strength.sup.f Elongation.sup.f Modulus.sup.fDesignation Strength.sup.e @ Yield @ Break @ Yield @ Break Secant Tangent__________________________________________________________________________'006 48 3640 psi 840 18% 710% 127,000 155,000'013 111 800 3230 70 1830 165,000 --Blend A 210 1900 2870 23 1620 70,600 76,000Blend B 227 1330 3030 28 1530 37,700 42,000__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.e Tear strength, in g/mil, measured using ASTM 1922, tear resistance by pendulum method .sup.f Tensile strength, elongation, and modulus measured using ASTM D638
EXAMPLE 3
Polymers used as blend components were synthesized by a procedure similar to that described below for Run 03. A stainless steel, 1-liter Zipperclave autoclave reactor was used in the syntheses. The reactor was equipped with a water jacket for heating and cooling, a septum inlet for injection of liquid components, a burette for measuring and adding purified hexane, and a controlled pressure source of purified ethylene and nitrogen. Polymerization reactions were started by cleaning the reactor and purging it with purified nitrogen for several hours. 800 cc of purified hexane was added to the reactor vessel at 25.degree. C. by means of the measuring burette. 100 cc of purified 1-hexene was then added under nitrogen, and the contents of the reactor were continuously stirred at 1200 rpm henceforth. 10.0 cc of the 10 wt % solution of methylalumoxane was added by syringe, and the reactor temperature was equilibrated at the reaction temperature of 60.degree. C. Hydrogen was not used in this example, however, it is added at this time in the examples which do use it. Hydrogen was metered into the reactor from a vessel of known volume equipped with a highly precise pressure gauge. The ideal gas law was used to calculate the millimoles of hydrogen introduced into the reactor. 1.00 cc of a solution of 0.01 wt % bis(n-butylcyclopentadienyl) zirconium dichloride in distilled toluene was then injected by syringe, followed by pressurization immediately with 90.9 psi of purified ethylene. Ethylene was fed continuously on demand to the stirring reactor while maintaining the reaction temperature at 60.degree. C. and the reaction pressure at 90 psi. After 10 minutes of polymerization the reaction was stopped by rapidly cooling and venting the pressure and exposing the contents to air. The polymer was obtained by evaporating the liquid components and drying in a vacuum oven for 1 hour. The poly(ethylene-co-hexene-1) polymer obtained, which is identified as CO3, was obtained in 89.7 yield.
Other polymerizations runs were performed using the procedure above with the exception that the volumes, temperatures, and other polymerization conditions were modified as shown in Table 3. Characterization data for the blend components are given in Table 4.
Blends 8A, 9D, 20C, 21F and 22E were each prepared using equal quantities of three blend components. (The letter designation in these blends corresponds to the type of blend illustrated in FIG. 1 .) Blend components for each of the blends are given in Table 4, and they were blended by the following solution blending procedure using ca. 14 g. of each blend component. 2000 cc of xylene was purged with nitrogen for one hour, the three blend components were added, and the mixture was stirred and heated to 144.degree. C. to dissolve the polymers. The polymer solution was then cooled to 70.degree. C., and 2000 cc of methanol was added to precipitate the polymer. The mixture was then cooled to 22.degree. C., and the precipitated polymer was filtered and dried in a vacuum oven. Average composition, composition distribution breadth index, molecular weight data, and density of the blends are listed in Table 4.
Compression molded sheets, five thousandth of an inch in thickness, were prepared by melting the blended polymers in a press, compressing to 20 tons pressure for 5 minutes and then cooling the blend under pressure to room temperature. Properties of the molded sheet specimen are shown in Table 5 for blends 8A, 9D, 20C, 21F and 22E. The fraction of polymer extracted by hexane at 69.degree. C. is also given for the blends.
Table 5 shows that the tear strength of blends 9D, 20C, 21F and 22E, i.e., blends having novel composition-molecular weight distributions, are each superior to that of blend 8A, which has a conventional-type composition-molecular weight distribution. In many applications it is desirable to have low levels of extractable polymer, and the table shows that blends 9D, 20C, 21F, and 22E are markedly superior to blend 8A in this respect. Moreover, tensile properties such as tensile strength at yield of the conventional-type blend 8A are generally comparable to the tensile strengths of the other blends. Consequently, the benefits of high tear strength and low levels of extractables can be achieved without undue loss of tensile properties.
This example illustrates the benefits obtained by certain novel composition-molecular weight distributions differing from the conventional type. Thus, blends 9D and 20C have similar average molecular weights and molecular weight distributions. Consequently, flow and melt fabrication performance of these blends should be similar to that of the conventional-type blend 8A. Therefore, the desirable mechanical and solubility properties of blends 9D and 20C are not obtained at the expense of fabrication performance. Additionally, blends 21F and 22E have much lower weight average molecular weight than blend 8A, and they should therefore be more easily fabricated into articles of commerce such as films, fibers and molded objects.
In summary, in the blends of this example (Type C, D, E and F blends) the average molecular weight and molecular weight distribution can be manipulated independently of the composition distribution. Superior solid state performance can therefore be achieved without sacrificing melt fabrication performance.
TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________POLYMERIZATION CONDITIONSPolymerization Reaction C.sub.2.sup.= Press. Time Hexane 1-Hexane Catalyst Yield H.sub.2 mRun No. Temp. .degree.C. (psi) (min.) (cc) (cc) Solu. (cc) gm mole__________________________________________________________________________03 60 90 10 800 100 1.0 89.7 --09 80 60 10 800 75 1.0 36.6 --15 80 60 15 800 -- 1.0 47.0 1019 80 60 60 800 75 0.25 44.2 --27 90 60 45 800 150 0.50 96.5 --30 75 75 42 800 87.5 0.55 86.4 --38 60 130 20 800 150 0.20 89.6 --42 60 60 30 800 -- 1.0 81.0 --48 70 170 9 300 600 0.5 114.0 --64 68 302 60 -- 800 0.05 53.0 --__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 4______________________________________POLYMER CHARACTERIZATION OF BLENDSAND BLEND COMPONENTSSample Mole %(a) Mw/ Den-Designation Hexene Mw (b) Mn (b) sity(b) CDBI(b)______________________________________27 6.1 12,500 1.9 -- 77%C30 2.0 48,800 1.9 -- 81C42 0.0 259,000 2.0 -- 100Blend 8A 2.7 113,000 9.0 0.933 24C15 0.0 13,400 2.7 -- 100C30 2.0 48,000 1.9 -- 81C64 4.2 223,000 2.2 -- --Blend 9D 2.1 95,600 9.8 0.940 42C19 2.3 13,600 1.9 -- 70C30 2.0 48,800 1.9 -- 81C38 2.2 240,000 2.2 -- --Blend 20C 2.3 94,800 8.8 0.932 64C15 0.0 13,400 2.7C09 3.0 52,000 2.4C03 3.1 121,000 2.2 -- 67Blend 21F -- 62,000 6.4 0.946 46C15 0.0 13,400 2.7 -- 100C09 3.0 52,000 2.4 -- 79C48 7.2 50,000 1.9 -- 75Blend 22E -- 37,800 4.2 0.940 37______________________________________ (a) Calculated from absorbance of 1378 cm-1 IR band using spectral subtraction to correct from overlap of adjacent IR bands. Residual peak a 1378 cm-1 was converted to hexene content using calibration obtained by C13 NMR analysis of poly(ethyleneco-hexenes). (b) Same as in Table 1 (c) Blend 8A consisted of equal quantities of C27, C30 and C42 (d) Blend 9D consisted of equal quantities of C15, C30 and C64 (e) Blend 20C consisted of equal quantities of C19, C30 and C38 (f) Blend 21F consisted of equal quantities of C15, C09 and C03 (g) Blend 22E consisted of equal quantities of C15, C09 and C48 (h) Blend components in this table are identified by the letter C followe by the corresponding polymerization run number from Table 3. For example, blend component C27 was obtained from polymerization run 27.
TABLE 6______________________________________PROPERTIES OF MOLDED SHEET Tear Strength Tensile Strength Hexane Extract-Sample g/mil at Yield, psi able Polymer %______________________________________Blend 8A 68 1770 22Blend 9D 241 1980 3.0Blend 20C 426 1400 6.3Blend 21F 205 2050 4.5Blend 22E 107 2050 6.7______________________________________ (a) Tear strength measured by ASTM 1922, tear resistance by pendulum method. (b) Tensile strength at yield measured using ASTM D638. (c) Extractables were determined as follows. About 0.5 g of polymer molde sheet, ca. 5 mil thick, was weighed and placed in a weighed cellulose extraction thimble. The thimble and polymer were placed in a vapor jacketed Soxlettype extractor, and the polymer was extracted with condensed vapors of boiling hexane at 69?C. for 16 hours. The thimble and residual polymer were removed, dried in a vacuum oven, and weighed to determine the amount of extracted, i.e., soluble, polymer.
EXAMPLE 4
The following comparisons show that blends comprised of narrow CD/narrow MWD interpolymers have surprisingly different properties from blends described by Fukushima, et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 4,438,238 (Fukushima '238), that is, from blends made from components that have broad CD and broad MWD of the prior art.
Fukushima '238 examples 28, 29, 38 and 42 were reproduced following instructions given in the patent. Characterization data for the blend components are listed in Table 7A. Component designations in this table correspond to the designations given in Fukushima '238, except that the postscript F has been added thereto. Mole percent comonomer was determined by an FTIR method analogous to that of Example 3, and these values were converted to short chain branches per 1000 C atoms (SCB). Densities were measured by density gradient method ASTM D1585 on ca. 50 mil thick specimens that were compression molded by melting at 200.degree. C., followed by cooling between metal platens at 20.degree. C. Melting points T.sub.m, were determined using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) by cooling a sample from 160.degree. C. at 10.degree. C./min, followed by heating at 10.degree. C./min. The peak of the melting endotherm was taken to be the value of T.sub.m.
Components having narrow CD and MWD were made using the same catalyst and similar procedures to those described in Example 3. Specific polymerization conditions, selected with the intention of obtaining M.sub.w and SCB values identical to those of Fukushima '238 blend components of Table 7A, are listed in Table 8. Polymerization product was recovered by cooling to room temperature, evaporating the solvent under nitrogen, washing the remaining material with isopropyl alcohol, and drying in a vacuum oven. Characterization data for these blend components are listed in Table 7B. These blend components are identified by the same designation as that of the corresponding Fukushima '238 blend component except that the postscript X replaces postscript F. For example, component B33X of Table 7B is analogous to the B33F component of Table 7A, and these corresponding components have very similar values of M.sub.w (70,000 vs. 74,000) and SCB (8 vs. 8). Comparison of Tables 7A and 7B show similar values of M.sub.w and SCB for all corresponding components. Thus, the average deviation of M.sub.w and SCB for corresponding components is 9% and 5% respectively, values that approximate the precision of M.sub.w and SCB measurements. However, the Fukushima '238 components of Table 7A have relatively low CDBI values (11 to 44%) compared to the components of Table 7B (67 to 88%). Fukushima '238 components also have relatively high values of M.sub.w /M.sub.n (3.8 to 6.3) compared to the components of Table 7B (2.1 to 2.9). Thus, Fukushima '238 components have a relatively wide distribution of composition and a relatively wide distribution of molecular weight compared to the components of this invention.
Blends were prepared by mixing of components in nearly equal quantities in the melt using a Brabender melt mixer. Table 9A lists blend compositions and blend characterization data for blends composed of broad CD and broad MWD components. For example, Blend 32F was made by blending components A32F and B32F in a 51:49 ratio. Table 9B provides similar data for blends composed of narrow CD and narrow MWD components. Comparison of Tables 9A and 9B shows that corresponding blends have almost identical M.sub.w and SCB levels. For example, blends 32F and 32X have M.sub.w equal to 116,000 and 119,000, respectively, and SCB equal to 20 to 19 branches/1000C, respectively. The average deviation of M.sub.w and SCB for corresponding blends in Tables 9A and 9B is quite small, 5% and 6%, respectively.
Each blend was ground to an extrudable powder with a Wylie mill, and the powder was fed into a Randcastle 1/4 inch cast film extrusion line operated at the following conditions: 180 RPM extruder rotation rate; 160.degree. C. melt temperature; 2 in wide slot die with 30 mil die gap; 20.degree. C. chill roll temperature; 1 g/min extrusion rate; 2 mil nominal film thickness. Properties were measured on these films by the following procedures:
1) Hexane extractables at 50.degree. C. wt %, following FDA, HHS 177.1520(d)(3)(ii).
2) Reblock of films following ASTM D3354, on films conditioned at 60.degree. C. and on films conditioned at 40.degree. C. for 24 hours.
3) Heat seals were made from the films on a laboratory scale Theller Model EB heat sealer. A dwell time of about one second and a sealing pressure of 50 N/cm.sup.2 was used for making the seals. The seals on the films were made in the transverse direction for both the blown and cast films and the heat sealing anvils were insulated from the heat sealing film by a Mylar film. The Mylar film is very stable at normal heat sealing temperatures and is easily removed from the heat sealing polymer after the seal has been made. The seals were aged for 24 hours before testing them for strength.
For the strength test, the sealed samples were cut into 1 inch (2.54 cm) wide pieces and then strength tested using an Instron instrument at a strain rate of 508 mm/min and a 2 inch (5.08 cm) jaw separation. The free ends of the sample are fixed in jaws, and then the jaws were separated until the seal fails. The peak load at seal break was measured and the seal strength was calculated by dividing the peak load by the sample width. A plot of seal strength versus temperature was made, and it was used to find the temperature at which a seal strength equaled 2 N/cm, T.sub.2N/cm.
4) The sample for hot tack testing was prepared as follows. Compression molded LLDPE seal layers film of size 14.times.14 cm, and thickness of 3-4 mils was laminated on to a HDPE extruded film of size 14.times.28 cm and thickness of 1.2-2.4 mils using a melt press maintained at 130.degree..+-.2.degree. C. The LLDPE seal layer was placed in the middle of the HDPE film. A pressure of approximately 20,000 pounds was applied for 2 min at 130.degree. C. After the 2 min, the laminated structure was removed from the heated platens and placed between the cold platens (maintained by circulating water at room temperature) and allowed to cool to room temperature. This specimen was then used to measure hot tack using the following procedure. The HDPE and seal layer laminate structure was cut into strips of 1.5 cm wide and 28 cm in length. The sample was made into a loop such that the LLDPE seal layer was inside, and the two ends of the films were attached to the movable and fixed arms. Hot tack was measured using a Pack Forsk DTC Hot Tack Tester, using conditions of: temperature=125.degree. C., pressure=0.5N/mm.sup.2, seal time=1.0 sec, delay time=0.0 sec and draw rate or peel speed=20 cm/sec.
5) The concentration of volatile hydrocarbons containing from 11 to 40 carbon atoms, C.sub.11-40, which is closely related to the tendency of polyethylenes to emit smoke upon extrusion (See M. L. Junget, EP-A-0 099 660 published Feb. 1, 1984) was measured using a combination of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and termogravimetric analysis (TGA). The fraction of material extracted upon immersion overnight in methylene dichloride at 20.degree. C. was determined by subsequently evaporating the extract to dryness. An aliquot of the extract was redissolved in methylene dichloride, and it was then analyzed by TGA to determine the fraction of the sample volatilized at 360.degree. C. Additionally, an aliquot of the extract was redissolved in an ethylene dichloride and examined by programmed temperature GC-MS to 360.degree. C. These data were combined to yield the concentration of C.sub.11-40 hydrocarbons present in the film.
6) Odor evaluation was conducted as follows: small diameter strands were prepared by extruding the sample in a rheometer through a cylindrical die with L/D 10:1 at 1100 sec.sup.-1 shear rate at 230.degree. C. melt temperature. The strands were cut into 5 cm lengths and a 100 cc jar was filled with 6.5 g. of strands without touching the strands by hand. The jars were covered with aluminum foil, closed, and heated at 50.degree. C. for one hour, followed by cooling for 30 minutes at room temperature. Six trained panelists ranked the odor of the samples in blind tests conducted on three sets of samples. The sample sets were: Set A, consisting of two samples, blends 32F and 32X; Set B consisting of two samples, blends 42F and 42X; and Set C consisting of four samples, blends 32F, 32X, 42F and 42X. In a ranking test of n samples, each panelist indicated which sample had the lowest odor (score of "1"), the next lowest score (score of "2"), etc. and the highest level of odor (score of "n"). The scores of the six panelists for a sample were averaged to yield the rank of the sample in the set. A higher rank is associated with a higher odor level.
7) Water off-taste testing was conducted as follows: The test specimens used in the odor evaluations were soaked in 80 cc water, covered with aluminum foil, closed and allowed to condition for six days at room temperature. The conditioned water was evaluated by each of six trained panelists. Rank tests were made in a fashion analogous to the odor tests described above. A higher rank indicates higher level of off-taste, i.e. poorer taste quality.
Results of these tests are given in Table 10 and are summarized as follows: (1) FDA extractables levels of Fukushima '238 blends are 2.4 to 10 times greater than those of corresponding blends of this invention. High extractable levels can restrict the use of polymers in food-grade packaging applications. (2) 40.degree. C. reblock levels of Fukushima '238 blends are 2.8 to 11 times greater than those of corresponding blends of this invention. 60.degree. C. reblock levels of Fukushima '238 blends are 1.1 to 3.7 times greater than those of corresponding blends of this invention, excluding 33F and 33X. High reblock levels can cause rolls of film to block, i.e. adhere so strongly that the film can not be unrolled for use. (3) C.sub.11-40 hydrocarbon levels of Fukushima '238 blends are 1.9 to 6.8 times greater than those of corresponding blends of this invention. Such higher levels of semi-volatile hydrocarbons would be expected to cause greater smoking upon extrusion. (4) Odor and off-taste levels of Fukushima '238 blends are greater than those of corresponding blends of this invention. Poor odor and off-taste are undesirable in food-contact applications of polymers. (5) Sealing temperatures T.sub.2N/cm, of Fukushima '238 blends are substantially greater (5.degree. to 19.degree. C.) than those of corresponding blends of this invention. High sealing temperatures are undesirable because they limit production rate and increase packaging costs. 6)Hot tack of Fukushima '238 blends are 1.4 to 2.4 times lower than that of corresponding blends of this invention. High hot tack is a requirement for package integrity in form, fill, and seal packaging applications.
TABLE 7A__________________________________________________________________________CHARACTERIZATION OF COMPONENTS HAVINGBROAD CD AND BROAD MWD Corresp.Component '238 Ex. Comon- Mw .times. Mw/ CDBI T.sub.m DensityDesignation Number omer(a) 10.sup.-3 Mn SCB (%) (.degree.C.) (g/cm.sup.3)__________________________________________________________________________A32F 28 4MP1 195 6.3 31 -- 126 0.893B32F 28 4MP1 69 3.9 8.4 23 129 0.931A33F 29 C.sub.6 199 5.2 26 33 123 --B33F 29 C.sub.6 70 4.8 8 33 127 0.932A42F 38 4MP1 206 4.1 14 20 128 0.917B42F 38 4MP1 58 3.8 14 29 129 0.923A46F 42 C.sub.6 198 4.5 18 11 125 0.913B46F 42 C.sub.6 43 4.1 20 44 124 0.916__________________________________________________________________________ (a) 4MP1 is 4methyl pentene1; C.sub.6 is nhexene-1.
TABLE 7B__________________________________________________________________________CHARACTERIZATION OF COMPONENTS HAVINGNARROW CD AND NARROW MWD Corresp.Component '238 Ex. Comon- Mw .times. Mw/ CDBI T.sub.m DensityDesignation Number omer 10.sup.-3 Mn SCB (%) (.degree.C.) (g/cm.sup.3)__________________________________________________________________________A32X -- 4MP1 195 2.7 27 77 99 0.904B32X -- 4MP1 64 2.4 10 74 118 0.934A33X -- C.sub.6 215 2.9 26 74 105 --B33X -- C.sub.6 74 2.3 8 88 119 0.915A42X -- 4MP1 230 2.9 14 76 112 --B42X -- 4MP1 54 2.1 14 81 116 0.935A46X -- C.sub.6 179 2.9 17 67 104 0.927B46X -- C.sub.6 22 2.2 20 83 109 0.933__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 8__________________________________________________________________________POLYMERIZATION CONDITIONS FOR NARROW CDAND NARROW MWD COMPONENTSPolymer- Reaction Ethylene Comonomer Catalystization Comon- Temp Pressure Time Volume SolutionRun Id. omer (C.) (psi) (min) (cc) (cc)__________________________________________________________________________A32X 4MP1 45 75 90 405 1.1B32X 4MP1 80 75 50 74 0.5A33X C.sub.6 50 75 80 80 0.9B33X C.sub.6 82 75 50 25 0.7A42X 4MP1 55 75 105 95 1.3B42X 4MP1 80 75 60 130 0.4A46X C.sub.6 68 250 35 800 0.5B46X C.sub.6 75 75 40 55 0.5__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 9A__________________________________________________________________________CHARACTERIZATION OF BLENDS MADE WITH COMPONENTSHAVING BROAD CD AND BROAD MWD Corresp. Wt. RatioComponent '238 Ex. Comon- of Blend Mw .times. Mw/ MI DensityDesignation Number omer Comp. 10.sup.-3 Mn SCB CDBI (a) (g/cm.sup.3)__________________________________________________________________________32F 28 4MP1 51 A32F: 116 7.6 20 0.22 0.8 0.913 49 B32F33F 29 C.sub.6 50 A33F: 114 6.6 18 0.23 1.0 0.922 50 B33F (*)42F 38 4MP1 50 A42F: 128 8.5 15 0.41 0.6 0.925 50 B42F (*)46F 42 C.sub.6 44 A46F: 101 6.8 20 0.22 1.5 0.917 56 B46F (*)__________________________________________________________________________ (a) Melt index was measured using ASTM D1738 in g/10 min. condition E. However, values with asterisks (*) were calculated from Mw using the empirical relation MI = 10.sup.18.99 .multidot. Mw.sup.-3.76
TABLE 9B__________________________________________________________________________CHARACTERIZATION OF BLENDS MADE WITH COMPONENTSHAVING A NARROW CD AND NARROW MWD Corresp. Wt. RatioComponent '238 Ex. Comon- of Blend Mw .times. Mw/ MI DensityDesignation Number omer Component 10.sup.-3 Mn SCB CDBI (a) (g/cm.sup.3)__________________________________________________________________________32X -- 4MP1 51 A32X: 119 3.1 19 0.61 0.6 0.920 49 B32X33X -- C.sub.6 50 A33X: 132 3.9 17 0.68 0.5 0.921 50 B33X (*)42X -- 4MP1 50 A42X: 127 3.4 14 0.77 0.6 0.930 50 B42X (*)46X -- C.sub.6 47 A46X: 86 4.2 19 0.82 2.7 0.929 53 B42X (*)__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE 5
This example illustrates a blend of Type D in FIG. 1 made using a plastomer component, i.e. an interpolymer with density in the 0.88 to 0.90 g/cm.sup.3 range, and a higher density component.
The blend components were made by a fluidized gas-phase process using the same catalyst as in Example 1. The plastomer component was made at 297 psig pressure, 1.622 ft/sec velocity, 122 lbs bed weight, 51.degree. C. temperature, 273 ppm hydrogen chain transfer agent, and the following gas phase concentrations: 33.2 mole percent ethylene, 3.6 mole percent butene-1, and 63.2 mole percent nitrogen. The resulting polymer had the following characteristics: 0.884 g/cc density by ASTM D1585, 87,000 M.sub.w, 2.3 M.sub.w /M.sub.n, 2.2 MI, 9 SCB/1000C, and >72% CDBI. The higher density component was made by a similar process using the same comonomer and had the following characteristics: 0.9348 g/cc density, 31,400 M.sub.w, 2.7 M.sub.w /M.sub.n, 95 MI, 46 SCB/1000C, and >80% CDBI. The two components were melt blended in 50:50 weight ratio using a Brabender mixer to give a blend with the following characteristics: 59,000 M.sub.w, 3.2 M.sub.w /M.sub.n, 29 SCB/1000C, and 41% CDBI.
TABLE 10__________________________________________________________________________COMPARISON OF PROPERTIES OF BLENDS COMPOSED OF BROADCD AND MWD COMPONENTS VIS-A-VIS BLENDS COMPOSED OFNARROW CD AND MWD COMPONENTS__________________________________________________________________________ Reblock Reblock Sealing C.sub.11 to C.sub.40 Hot Tack Blend FDA @ @ Temp volatile, @ 125.degree. C.Blend Type Extractables 40.degree. C., g 60.degree. C., g T.sub.2N/cm ppm N/15 min__________________________________________________________________________32F Fukushima 3.58% 139 169 92.degree. C. 2920 1.8 '23832X This 0.34 27 77 74.degree. C. 1530 4.3 Invention33F Fukushima 1.63 77 77 92.degree. C. 3640 3.8 '23833X This 0.50 28 106 87.degree. C. 1550 5.4 Invention42F Fukushima 2.11 57 86 107.degree. C. 4580 -- '23842X This 0.34 5 23 88.degree. C. 1600 -- Invention46F Fukushima 3.66 51 63 97.degree. C. 4590 2.7 '23846X This 1.50 6 56 84.degree. C. 670 5.0 Invention__________________________________________________________________________ Odor Test Rank (a) Off-Taste Test (a)Blend Comonomer Set A Set B Set C Set A Set B Set C__________________________________________________________________________32F Fukushima '238 1.8 of 2 -- 3.1 of 4 1.8 of 2 -- 3.8 of 432X This Invention 1.2 of 2 -- 2.2 of 4 1.2 of 2 -- 2.5 of 433F Fukushima '238 -- -- -- -- -- --33X This Invention -- -- -- -- -- --42F Fukushima '238 -- 2.0 of 2 3.8 of 4 -- 1.9 of 2 2.4 of 442X This Invention -- 1.0 of 2 1.0 of 4 -- 1.1 of 2 1.3 of 446F Fukushima '238 -- -- -- -- -- --46X This Invention -- -- -- -- -- --__________________________________________________________________________ (a) Higher value indicates higher odor level. (b) Higher value indicates higher level of offtaste.
While the present invention has been described and illustrated by reference to particular embodiments thereof, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that the invention lends itself to variations not necessarily illustrated herein. For example, various changes in the materials, apparatus, and particular steps employed will occur to those skilled in the art. Also, for improvement in processability and manipulation of final end product characteristics the interpolymers of this present invention can be blended or coextruded into single or multilayer films or the like with various other polymers well known in the art, for instance, LLDPE, LDPE, HDPE, PP, PB, EVA and the like. The precise and versatile tailoring of molecular structure of the polyethylene blends of this present invention which uses narrow CD and MWD blend components allow for greater flexibility in optimizing specific desired end-use properties and in obtaining an optimum balance of properties. Blends of this invention can therefore be used to advantage in all forming operations and in all articles to which polyethylenes have been applied. Such forming operations include, film, sheet, and fiber extrusion and co-extrusion as well as blow molding, injection molding and roto molding. Films include blown or cast films in mono-layer or multilayer constructions formed by coextrusion or by lamination. Such films are useful as shrink film, cling film, stretch film, sealing films, oriented films, snack packaging, heavy duty bags, grocery sacks, baked and frozen food packaging, medical packaging, industrial liners, membranes, etc. in food-contact and non-food contact applications. Fiber forming operations include melt spinning, solution spinning and melt blown fiber operations. Such fibers may be used in woven or non-woven form to make filters, diaper fabrics, medical garments, geotextiles, etc. General extruded articles include medical tubing, wire and cable coatings, geomembranes, and pond liners. Molded articles include single and multi-layered constructions in the form of bottles, tanks, large hollow articles, rigid food containers and toys, etc. In addition, the metallocene catalyst of this present invention can include non-cyclopentadienyl catalyst components, or ancillary ligands such as boroles or carbollides in combination with a transition metal. For these reason, then, reference should be made solely to the appended claims for the purposes of determining the true scope of the present invention.

Number	Name	Date
3645992	Elston	Feb 1972
4243619	Fraser et al.	Jan 1981
4405774	Miwa et al.	Sep 1983
4438238	Fukushima et al.	Mar 1984
4668752	Tominari et al.	May 1987
4786697	Cosewith et al.	Nov 1988
4789714	Cosewith et al.	Dec 1988
4935474	Ewen et al.	Jun 1990
4937299	Ewen et al.	Jun 1990

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	14094	Feb 1993
Parent	252094	Sep 1988

Linear ethylene interpolymer blends of interpolymers having narrow molecular weight and composition distributions

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

US Referenced Citations (9)

Continuations (1)

Continuation in Parts (2)