1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a liquid filter for an internal combustion engine. More particularly, the invention relates to a liquid filter that has a support tower for supporting the filter medium, the support tower being fixedly mounted on the filter housing.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Such liquid filters are known from the automotive engineering sector. The essentially tubular support tower serves to prevent the filter medium of the filter insert from collapsing under the prevailing temperature and pressure conditions during filter operation. Liquid filters are used, for example, as fuel or oil filters, whereby conventional liquid filters are constructed differently, depending upon the their application as either fuel or oil filters.
The demand is for the most reliable separation possible between the filtered and unfiltered sides of the filter. Different surfaces of the filter may lie on the unfiltered, or the filtered side of the filter, depending upon the arrangement of inflow and outflow ports for the liquid to be filtered. The support tower is located on the filtered side of the filter in the typical construction of the conventional filter used in the industry. The filtering surface of the filter medium forms a barrier that separates the unfiltered side of the filter from the filtered side during filter operation. The filter medium may be constructed, for example, as a pleated paper filter, so that the filtering surface is a porous paper material. Increasing precision in the construction of fuel injection systems also increases the demands on the fuel, particularly with respect to its purity. For example, even slight contamination of the fuel can pose a significant problem, since, for example, dirt particles can block the fine nozzle channels of the injection system or water can corrode the sensitive materials used inside the injection system. Appropriate selection of the filtering paper material can ensure the desired separation of unfiltered and filtered sides during filter operation.
It is possible, however, particularly during a so-called filter change, that is, when replacing the filter insert, that contaminants reach the filtered side from the unfiltered side. Particularly, there is the risk that contaminants from the area of the engine compartment can get into the opened filter, that is, into the filter housing and be deposited on the filtered side of the filter, for example, on the support tower.
Other contaminants that can get into the inner area of the filter housing end up for the most part on the surfaces, which later, that is, after the filter insert is installed, are on the unfiltered side of the filter. These contaminants are not critical, because the filter medium will hold them during filter operation.
The object of the invention is to improve the conventional liquid filter in such a way that the filter offers the best protection possible of the filtered side against contamination that can occur during filter service.
This object is achieved by providing a liquid filter that has a housing enclosing by a hollow space, with a removable lid for closing the housing. An exchangeable filter element is arranged in the housing. This filter element has a ring-shaped cross-section and a filter medium for filtering liquid. A support tower that prevents the filter medium from collapsing is fixedly arranged in the housing and extends into the hollow space. The support tower is constructed essentially as a cylindrical tube. Passage openings in the support tower provide a flow path from outside the support tower into an inner central space of the support tower. The filter element has a lower end that projects deepest into the housing. A circumferential seal and a circumferential wiping lip are provided on the lower end of the filter elements. Both the seal and the wiping lip extend radially inward and fit up against the support tower.
In other words, the filter according to the invention provides protection against contamination at two sites: On the one hand, contaminants can occur along the support tower, that is, on the outer surface area of an basically approximately cylindrical support tower. According to a first embodiment of the invention, the combination of wiping lip and seal provides a cleaning process that wipes these contaminants off of the support tower when the filter insert is installed and pushed down along the support tower. The contaminants are thereby pushed farther into the inside of the filter on the support tower, that is, onto the unfiltered side of the filter. When the filter insert has been completely assembled on the support tower, clean, filtered liquid moves radially from the outside of the filter insert, all the way through the filter medium to the support tower, and reaches the outer surface area of the support tower. The cleaning process during assembly of the filter insert ensures that this liquid cannot now transport any contaminants into the inside of the support tower. When the liquid filter according to the invention is constructed as a fuel filter, for example, the cleaning process prevents particles from penetrating into a fuel injection system; when constructed as an oil filter, it prevents particles from getting into the fine boreholes that serve as the oil channels.
Although contaminants are still found in the filter, they are on the unfiltered side, outside of the filter insert, where they either remain or are entrained by the flow of the liquid and carried to the outside of the filter medium, which holds them back.
In order to ensure reliable cleaning of the support tower, the support tower in the liquid filter according to the invention has a cylindrical, smooth-walled outer surface. A ribbed surface structure of the support tower would sufficiently provide the support function for the filter insert. Nevertheless, a smooth-walled construction according to the invention is suggested, so as to prevent initially removed impurities from settling into depressions on the outside of the support tower, where they would be beyond the reach of the wiping lip of the filter insert. Within the framework of the present embodiment, a support tower surface is termed smooth-walled, if it allows the wiping lip to circumferentially fit up against the outer surface of the support tower as it travels along the support tower, thus guaranteeing the desired wiping effect. The surface of the support tower can therefore have a certain waviness and does not necessarily have to be a strictly cylindrical construction.
In practice, conventional filters are mounted in the most diverse installation positions. Within the framework of the present embodiment, however, “above” and “below” refer to an orientation that, merely as an example, assumes that the filter housing has a vertical center axis and that the filter cover is located above.
According to the invention, the wiping lip is arranged below the seal that is provided on the filter insert. Thus, the wiping lip is guided over the support tower before the seal reaches the same place on the support tower. This ensures, first of all, that the seal can optimally fit up against the support tower, since there are no impurities on the support tower in the area where the seal fits. Secondly, this guarantees advantageously that the entire area of the support tower belonging to the filtered side of the filter during filter operation has a cleaned surface, since the wiping lip is arranged in front of the seal in the assembly direction of the filter insert and, when the filter insert is installed, the seal separates the unfiltered side from the filtered side.
A cylindrical construction of the support tower ensures that the wiping lip can reliably remove contaminants that are stuck on the surface of the support tower along the entire path over which the wiping lip is guided during the assembly of the filter insert on the support tower. Within the framework of the present embodiment, “cylindrical” should not be understood as geometrically precisely cylindrical, but rather the support tower may be designed with a slightly conical or wavy surface. For example, the support tower may be tapered in order to facilitate its release from the mold during the manufacture of the support tower. In this case, however, under practical considerations, the different diameters along the entire length of the support tower should differ so little from each other that the cleaning function of the wiping lip during filter insert assembly may be reliably guaranteed. With respect to the cross-sectional geometry of the support tower, deviations from a precisely circular embodiment may also be implemented, for example, the support tower may have an oval profile. The circular shape that would, however, be connected to the cylindrical construction of the support tower is advantageous, inasmuch as it enables the wiping lip to exert a uniform circumferential contact pressure against the support tower and thus ensures uniform cleaning results along the entire periphery of the support tower.
The aforementioned construction of the support tower surface, which deviates from an ideal cylinder, may advantageously have a surface profile with some protrusions. Under the prevailing temperature and pressure conditions during filter operation, one can assume that the filter medium lies up against the support tower, specifically against these aforementioned protrusions. Between the protrusions, areas are thus created where the filter medium does not lie up against the surface of the support tower. Liquid that has passed radially inward through the filter medium and is now filtered and clean, therefore finds flow paths between the protrusions through which it can flow to a port or an opening, whereby the port leads to the inside of the support tower.
When the filter insert is pushed onto the support tower, it is advantageous to be careful with the seal of the filter insert and protect it from damage. Advantageously, the outer circumference of the support tower in seal area where the filter insert seal contacts or fits up against the support tower may have a circumference or an external diameter that is greater than the rest of the support tower. Thus, if the diameter of the seal area is designed for optimal fit of the seal, then, the diameter of the support tower above this seal area will be smaller than that of the seal area. The seal of the filter insert therefore does not scrape along the surface of the support tower with an undesirably high pressure, when the filter insert is installed. The greater diameter in the seal area, however, guarantees the desired seal-tight fit of the seal on the support tower.
A second area in which contaminants can occur, which then possibly reach the filtered side of the filter, is via the upper face of the support tower. Depending upon the construction of the filter and the filter insert, this upper face of the support tower may lie on the filtered side of the filter. In order to prevent contaminants that have settled on this upper face of the support tower from being transported by the filtered, clean liquid into the inside of the support tower, and, from there, for example, to the supply sites of the engine, the upper end plate of the filter insert has a seal-tight fit, so that these types of contaminants are unable to escape the face of the support tower, and instead remain there.
An advantageous filter insert has, for example, on its lower end plate or adjacent to this end plate, that is, on its lower end, a circumferential wiping lip that contacts or fits up against the support tower of the filter as described above. Placing the wiping lip as far down as possible on the filter insert enables a space-saving design for the filter insert. This enhances the most compact possible construction for the entire filter, so that it may be installed even under crowded assembly conditions, for example, in an engine compartment of an automobile. The lower end of the filter insert is initially guided into the filter housing and onto the support tower, which enables reliable cleaning of contaminants found on the outer surface area of the support tower.
This wiping lip can be constructed as an extension of the lower end plate. For example, the lip may be made from the same material as that of the lower end plate and be constructed as a relatively thin-walled wiping lip, in contrast to the correspondingly thicker construction of the lower end plate. This construction avoids the costs for a second component and its assembly.
Alternatively, the wiping lip may advantageously be made of an elastomeric or foam material, so as to ensure a reliable seal of the support tower throughout the entire service life of the filter insert. Material relaxation, due to the effects of temperature, pressure or age, may be excluded by selecting the appropriate material. Due to its compressibility, a foam material, for example, makes it possible to bridge comparatively large differences in diameter, so that, for example, it is even possible for the foam lip to clean a profiled support tower, namely, to clean both the protrusions and the areas therebetween.
The wiping lip, if made of a different material than the lower end plate, may be molded onto or adhesively affixed to the lower end plate. Alternatively, the wiping lip may be provided with its own retainer, which itself is connected to the filter insert. Thus, for example, a ring-shaped retainer may be provided which is made of a material that is particularly reliable or that can be connected especially inexpensively to the lower end plate of the filter insert, so that this retainer ensures the reliable contact or fit of the wiping lip in its designated location.
Advantageously, the wiping lip may extend radially inward farther than the seal of the filter insert, which ensures reliable cleaning of the support tower. This also applies to those places where the support tower has a smaller diameter than in the seal area where the seal of the assembled filter insert contacts or fits up against the support tower.
A particularly compact construction of the filter insert is possible, if the seal and the wiping lip are constructed as a common combined component.
Advantageously, such a combined component can be made of a single material, that is, made completely of the same material. This means that this combined-component can be produced particularly economically. Furthermore, the space-saving filter insert may be particularly compact in construction, since two different components, namely, the wiping lip and the seal, do not have to be assembled axially behind one another. Rather, only the space for the seal must be provided, and the wiping lip can extend as a section of the combination component from the seal section of this combined component.
Alternatively, however, this combined component may be made of at least two different materials. For example, a basic material may be used to form the seal and a second material, which exhibits optimal cleaning properties and, for example, a particularly high stretchability, may be used to form the wiping lip.
For example, the combined component made of two materials may be designed as a so-called two-component part, as is known, for example, in everyday life, for example, in toothbrushes, whose handles have a comparably harder first component, as well as some areas made from a relatively softer second component. Thus, for the combined component, the first component may, for example, form the seal, and the second component the wiping lip.
The seal in the upper area of the support tower may advantageously be such that the upper end plate is sealed directly against the tubular body of the support tower. Thus, apart from the seal itself, no additional intermediate components need be provided. In this case, too, manufacture of the liquid filter is particularly economical, because manufacturing and assembly costs are avoided.
Alternatively, an aforementioned intermediate component may be provided, whereby this intermediate component is fixedly connected to either the filter insert or the support tower and the seal contacts or fits up against this intermediate component. Depending upon the construction of the filter, such an intermediate component enables implementation of complicated geometries, or easily allows implementation of additional functions in the area of the upper end of the support tower.
The upper end of the support tower may advantageously be covered by a cap that not only enables a closing of the tubular support tower, but also contains an additional functional element. Such a functional element can, for example, be provided as a vent, if, for example, the liquid filter is constructed to be a fuel filter. Alternatively, this functional element may be constructed as the filter bypass valve of an oil filter, which opens at a set pressure in a known manner in order to create a flowpath connection from the unfiltered side to the filtered side of the filter. This is desirable, for example, if the filter medium is clogged or if the oil has a high viscosity caused by temperature, and, as a result, only insufficient amounts of oil, which are needed for supplying all lubricating points, are flowing through the filter.
The aforementioned cap may advantageously be constructed as part of the upper end plate of the filter insert, which allows the elimination of an additional component.
Alternatively, the cap may advantageously be constructed as an additional component which is arranged in the upper end of the tubular body of the support tower. This ensures that, following disassembly of the filter insert, the support tower is not open on the face side. In this state, the cap reliably prevents contaminants from penetrating into the support tower, since the cap remains fixedly attached to the filter, namely, arranged on the support tower.
When the liquid filter is constructed as a fuel filter, it may advantageously have a conventional fuel-tank runback. On the one hand, this makes a high fuel pump performance possible, which, under certain operating conditions of the engine, causes a surplus of the delivered fuel to be returned to the tank. Furthermore, contaminants may be removed from inside of the filter housing in this way, namely, carried back to the fuel tank, where they can settle out of the fuel.
Using the purely schematic drawings, embodiments of the innovation are explained in more detail below. Shown are:
a is a partial cross-sectional view of a further embodiment of the closing member on the upper end plate.
This embodiment of the liquid filter 1 is a fuel filter. The unfiltered liquid is fed into the interior 9, into the unfiltered interior space 9A of the housing 2 and reaches the outside of the filter insert 5. The unfiltered liquid flows through the filter medium 6 and, in this way, now filtered, reaches the interior filtered space 9B inside of the filter insert 5. From there, the filtered liquid travels upward in the folds of the filter insert 5, along the support tower 4, where it reaches passage openings or through-ports 10 and, in this way, flows into an internal clean area 4A inside the support tower 4, which leads to the outflow port of the liquid filter 1.
The support tower 4 has a smooth exterior wall and is constructed as a cylinder, with a wiping lip 11 provided in the area of the lower end plate 8. The wiping lip 11 scrapes contaminants downward on the outer surface of the support tower 4, during installation of the filter insert 5, thus cleaning the support tower 4. In the drawing, the contours of each of the different seals are shown in their undeformed state, in order to better illustrate the dimensions of the respective seal components.
The wiping lip 11 shown in
The examples of the embodiments shown in
In all previously described embodiments, the cap 18 contains a functional component in the form of a vent 20.
The second possibility is that particles may reach the outside of the support tower 4. In this case, they are scraped off by the aforementioned wiping lip 11 during installation of a new filter insert 5 and are thereby kept on the unfiltered side of the filter, where they are not critical.
The third possibility-is when particles may get into the support tower 4 that is open at the top and, thus, into a tank runback 29. This fuel tank runback 29 allows filtered, excess fuel, for example, fuel that is not needed by the injection system of a combustible engine, to flow back into the fuel tank. The particles then either settle out in the tank or are transported again from there with the fuel to the liquid filter 1, namely, to its unfiltered side, and are subsequently held back by the filter medium 6 of the filter insert 5, within the framework of the normal filtration process.
The embodiment shown in
a shows a variant of the embodiment of
The arrangement of the filter bypass valve in the cap 18 enables problem-free assembly of the filter bypass valve, since complete access to all assembly sites is provided. The cap 18 with the filter bypass valve can be easily and fixedly attached to the support tower 4, similar to the caps 18 of the other embodiments. In contrast, mounting a filter bypass valve onto the upper end of the support tower would be much more complicated. If the support tower formed the valve opening 25 on its upper end then the assembly including the valve unit 24, the springs 26, and the spring base 27 would have to be extend through the entire length of the support tower to its upper end. Instead, as shown in
The spaces between the protrusions 31 provide flow paths 32 for the filtered liquid. This ensures that, even if the filter medium 6 should sit tightly against the protrusions 31 of the support tower 4, the filtered liquid, which is flows radially within the filter medium 6, can still flow along the flow paths 32 to the passage openings 10.
The illustrations in the
The combination component is pushed onto the seal area 34 when the filter insert 5 is inserted to its final assembled position on the support tower 4. The larger diameter in the seal area 34 results in the wiping lip 11 being pressed outward even more, so that the seal 15 fits up against the support tower 4 in this seal area 34. Both of these two different assembly positions of the combination component are shown in each of the
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20 2006 017 614.4 | Nov 2006 | DE | national |