Patent Grant
8883995
Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 1.821(c), an electronic version of the substitute sequence listing has been submitted as an ASCII compliant text file named “SubstituteSequenceListing2.txt” that was created on Feb. 5, 2014, and has a size of 31,696 bytes. The content of this file is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The present invention is directed, generally, to prevention of influenza virus infections, in particular, to prevention of infections by seasonal strains of influenza virus and those with pandemic potential. More specifically, disclosed herein are novel live attenuated influenza virus (LAIV) vaccines comprising one or more microRNA Response Element(s) (MRE).
Influenza virus infection in humans is a respiratory disease that ranges in severity from subclinical infection to primary viral pneumonia that can result in death. Influenza-associated complications include, among others, Reye's syndrome, myocarditis, pericarditis, myositis, encephalopathy and transverse myelitis. The persistence and unfettered nature of influenza virus leads to yearly epidemics as well as sporadic pandemics with potential to cause catastrophic loss of life. Palese et al., Nature Medicine 8(9):927 (2002). Seasonal influenza is the seventh leading cause of death in the United States and the leading cause of death in children ages 1 to 4 years. Ninety percent of deaths in people 65 and older are the result of influenza virus infection with associated pneumonia. Every year in the United States, approximately 36,000 people die, 114,000 are hospitalized, and the country incurs more than $1 billion in direct economic costs.
Three types of influenza viruses (A, B, and C) are distinguishable by antigenic reactivities of their internal antigens. Influenza A, B and C belong to the family Orthomyxoviridae and have a segmented negative strand RNA genome that is replicated in the nucleus of the infected cell and consists of eight negative-sense RNA (nsRNA) gene segments that encode 10 polypeptides, including RNA-directed RNA polymerase proteins (PB2, PB1 and PA), nucleoprotein (NP), neuraminidase (NA), hemagglutinin (HA, which after enzymatic cleavage is made up of the association of subunits HA1 and HA2), the matrix proteins (M1 and M2) and the non-structural proteins (NS1 and NS2, also referred to as Nuclear Export Protein (NEP)). Krug et al., In The Influenza Viruses, R. M. Krug, ed., Plenum Press, New York, 1989, pp. 89-152. The HA and NA proteins embedded in the viral envelope are the primary antigenic determinants of the influenza virus (Air et al., Structure, Function, and Genetics, 1989, 6:341-356; Wharton et al., In The Influenza Viruses, R. M. Krug, ed., Plenum Press, New York, 1989, pp. 153-174). Due to the possible reassortment of the influenza virus' segmented genome (antigenic shift) and the accumulation of genomic polymorphisms (antigenic drift), new HA and NA variants are constantly created for which a newly infected organism has no anamnestic immune response. Such constant generation of new antigenic variants from a vast number of circulating strains creates enhanced danger of emergence of new highly pathogenic strains (such as, e.g., H5N1 and H1N1 influenza A virus transmitted directly from avian or swine species to humans) and creates the need for annual vaccination and development of antiviral agents that are effective against many or all strains. Palese, Nature Medicine 10(12 Suppl):S82 (2004); Garcia-Sastre and Biron, Science 312(5775):879 (2006); Li et al., Nature 2004, 430:209; Kuiken et al., Science 2004, 306:241. This has forced the World Health Organization to monitor current strains and constantly update the composition of the annual vaccine. For the production of a safe and effective vaccine it is important that the selected vaccine strains are closely related to the circulating strains, thereby ensuring that the antibodies in the vaccinated population are able to neutralize the antigenetically similar virus.
Among the three types of influenza viruses, influenza A and B viruses cause significant morbidity and mortality in humans. Fields et al., Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa., 2007. Thus, annual vaccines used to combat influenza virus infection include a combination of two influenza A strains with a single influenza B strain. Palese, Nature Medicine 10(12 Suppl):582 (2004).
Propagation of these viral strains is usually performed in embryonated chicken eggs, where the virus can grow to very high titers. The virus particles generated in eggs are subsequently purified and used as stocks for vaccine preparations. Recently, mammalian cell culture systems for large-scale influenza vaccine production have been also established. Reviewed in, e.g., Genzel and Reichl, Expert Review of Vaccines, 2009, 8(12):1681-1692. Currently, vaccines produced in three different mammalian cell lines (Madin-Darby Canine Kidney [MDCK], Vero and PER.C6) are in clinical trials.
Recently developed reverse-genetics systems have allowed the manipulation of the influenza viral genome (Palese et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93:11354; Neumann and Kawaoka, Adv. Virus Res. 1999, 53:265; Neumann et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96:9345; Fodor et al., J. Virol. 1999, 73:9679; U.S. Patent Publication No. 20040029251). For example, it has been demonstrated that the plasmid-driven expression of eight influenza vRNAs from a pol I promoter and all mRNAs from a pol II promoter result in the formation of infectious influenza A virus (Hoffmann et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97:6108; Hoffmann et al., Vaccine 2002, 20:3165; U.S. Pat. No. 6,951,754).
The influenza vaccines currently licensed by public health authorities for use in the United States and Europe are inactivated influenza vaccines as well as the live attenuated FLUMIST vaccine in the United States.
Inactivated vaccines are produced by chemical inactivation of the virus grown either in cell culture or in embryonated chicken eggs. Chemical inactivation is usually followed by detergent-mediated fragmentation. Typical inactivation/fragmentation treatments involve such agents as formalin+Triton, formaldehyde, beta-propiolactone, ether, ether+Tween-80, cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB)+Triton N101, sodium deoxycholate and tri(n-butyl) phosphate. Nicholson, Webster and May (eds.), Textbook of Influenza, Chapters 23, 24, 27, pp. 317-332 and 358-372. For the virus produced in eggs, inactivation can occur after or prior to clarification of allantoic fluid. Although inactivation dramatically increases the safety of the vaccine, it reduces vaccine potency. Also, vaccine testing to ensure loss of replicative activity is time-consuming and labor-intensive, which increases vaccine cost and decreases the usefulness of the vaccine during rapidly spreading seasonal infections and pandemics.
Current vaccine strategies focus on live attenuated influenza virus (LAIV) strains through the development of temperature-sensitive mutants or the removal of pathogenic factors such as the NS1 protein. Talon, J. et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97:4309-4314 (2000); Nichol, Vaccine, 19:4373-4377 (2001); Palese et al., J. Infect. Dis., 1997, 176 Suppl 1:S45-9. For example, FLUMIST (Influenza Virus Vaccine Live, Intranasal) contains influenza virus strains which are (a) cold-adapted (i.e., they replicate efficiently at 25° C., a temperature that is restrictive for replication of many wild-type influenza viruses); (b) temperature-sensitive (i.e., they are restricted in replication at 37° C. (Type B strains) or 39° C. (Type A strains), temperatures at which many wild-type influenza viruses grow efficiently); and (c) attenuated (they do not produce classic influenza-like illness in the ferret model of human influenza infection).
As compared to traditional inactivated vaccines, LAIV vaccines are well suited for mucosal (e.g., intranasal) administration and generate a more robust immune response by inducing local, mucosal, cell-mediated and humoral immunity. Treanor et al., New England J. Med. 354(13):1343 (2006) Still, current LAIV vaccines are too attenuated to stimulate a strong immune response in elderly people, the major group of the 20,000-40,000 individuals in the US dying each year as a result of influenza infection. Most importantly, present LAIV vaccines are subject to replicative impairment in embryonated chicken eggs because they have been adapted to growth at suboptimal temperatures required for proper egg development, thereby limiting the subsequent scale of vaccine production. Such impediment on global scale production must be overcome should a highly pathogenic pandemic strain emerge. Li et al., Nature 430(6996):209 (2004) and Krug, Science 311(5767):1562 (2006).
Thus, there is a great need in the art for new influenza vaccines that are safe, efficient for generating protective immunity and are amenable to rapid large-scale production in chicken eggs and/or cell culture. In particular, there is a great need in the art for new more efficient LAIV vaccines.
The present invention addresses these and other needs in the art by providing novel live attenuated influenza virus (LAIV) vaccines comprising one or more species-specific and/or tissue/cell-specific microRNA (miRNA) Response Element(s) (MRE). Tissue/cell- and species-specific MREs useful in LAIV vaccines of the present invention bind, and are post-transcriptionally inhibited by, miRNAs which are expressed at high levels in a particular cell or tissue type targeted by the influenza virus in an animal to be vaccinated (including, e.g., epithelial, secretory [Clara], ciliated, apical, goblet [mucous], hematopoietic [e.g., dendritic cells, macrophages, lymphocytes], bronchial, and other cells of the lung and upper respiratory tract targeted by the influenza virus) and/or miRNAs which are expressed at high levels in a select species to be vaccinated (e.g., human, mouse, canine, chicken), but are not expressed or are expressed at very low levels in a cell line or species (e.g., embryonated chicken eggs [Gallus gallus]) used for a large-scale vaccine production. While MRE insertion in coding regions of the influenza genome is preferred as it increases vaccine safety by preventing emergence of escape mutants, the present invention also encompasses the incorporation of MREs in other parts of influenza genome and in artificially generated influenza virus 3′ UTRs. The MRE-based live attenuated vaccine strategy of the present invention provides the versatility, safety, and efficacy required for rapid generation of large quantities of vaccines for newly emerging seasonal and pandemic influenza strains.
In a more general aspect, the present invention is applicable to any virus amenable to recombinant production. By insertion of species- and/or tissue/cell-specific MREs into the viral genome, the present invention allows generation of recombinant viruses which can be used as live attenuated vaccines and can be efficiently propagated in another species or cell line derived from tissues/cells not targeted by these viruses.
Specifically, in the first aspect, the present invention provides a composition comprising a recombinant influenza virus wherein said influenza virus contains one or more MRE sequences. In a preferred embodiment, the influenza virus contains two or more MRE sequences. Such two or more MREs can have identical sequences, can differ in several nucleotide positions while maintaining the same MRE seed sequence (i.e., 5′ positions 1-7 or 2-8 of the miRNA sequence), or can even correspond to two or more different miRNAs.
In a preferred embodiment, such one or more MRE sequences are inserted within a coding region of one or more influenza virus genes. Such one or more MREs can be inserted regardless of a reading frame so long as the number of amino acid changes is kept to a minimum to preserve the viral protein function. An MRE can be inserted into a coding region of any influenza virus protein, including HA, NA, PB1, PB2, PA, M1, M2, NP, NS1, and NEP. Preferably, an MRE is inserted into a coding region of an influenza virus protein which is conserved between different influenza strains such as, for example, PB1, PB2, PA, M1, M2, NP, NS1, and NEP.
In another specific embodiment, MRE sequence is inserted in an artificially generated influenza virus 3′ UTR.
In a specific embodiment, the MRE inserted in an influenza virus genome corresponds to a miRNA which is expressed in a species-specific and/or tissue/cell-specific manner. In one embodiment, the MRE inserted in an influenza virus genome corresponds to a miRNA which is highly expressed in mammalian cells but is not expressed or is expressed at very low levels in the regions where influenza viral propagation occurs within embryonated chicken eggs. In a specific embodiment, the MRE corresponds to miRNA selected from the group consisting of miR-16, miR-17, miR-19, miR-25, miR-34, miR-92, and miR-93. For example, such MRE can correspond to miRNA selected from the group consisting of miR-16 having sequence 5′-UAGCAGCACGUAAAUAUUGGCG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 1), miR-17 having sequence 5′-CAAAGUGCUUACAGUGCAGGUAG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 2), miR-19 having sequence 5′-UGUGCAAAUCUAUGCAAAACUGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 3), miR-25 having sequence 5′-CAUUGCACUUGUCUCGGUCUGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 4), miR-34 having sequence 5′-UGGCAGUGUCUUAGCUGGUUGU-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 5), miR-92 having sequence 5′-UAUUGCACUUGUCCCGGCCUG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 6), and miR-93 having sequence 5′-CAAAGUGCUGUUCGUGCAGGUAG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 7).
In another embodiment, the MRE inserted in an influenza virus genome corresponds to a miRNA which is highly expressed in tissues targeted by the influenza virus in an animal to be vaccinated but is not expressed or is expressed at very low levels in the cell lines used for influenza virus propagation and large-scale production. In a specific embodiment, the MRE corresponds to miRNA selected from the group consisting of miR-142, miR-222, miR-149, miR-1977, miR-181b-2, miR-1259, and miR-1978. For example, such MRE can correspond to miRNA selected from the group consisting of miR-142 having sequence 5′-UGUAGUGUUUCCUACUUUAUGGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 141), miR-222 having sequence 5′-AGCUACAUCUGGCUACUGGU-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 142), miR-149 having sequence 5′-UCUGGUCCGUGUCUUCACUCCC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 143), miR-1977 having sequence 5′-GAUUAGGGUGCUUAGCUGUUAA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 144), miR-181b-2 having sequence 5′-AACAUUCAUUGCUGUCGGUGGGU-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 145), miR-1259 having sequence 5′-AUAUAUGAUGACUUAGCUUUU-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 146), and miR-1978 having sequence 5′-GGUUUGGUCCUAGCCUUUCUA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 147).
In a specific embodiment, the recombinant attenuated influenza virus of the invention is derived from an influenza subtype selected from the group consisting of H5N1, H1N1, H2N2, and H3N2. In one embodiment, the recombinant attenuated influenza virus of the invention is derived from an isolate selected from the group consisting of A/Vietnam/1203/04, A/chicken/Scotland/59, A/duck/Hong Kong/308/78, A/PuertoRico/8/1934, A/NewYork/616/1995, A/California/04/2009, A/HongKong/16/68, A/USSR/039/68, A/Yokohama/C5/85, A/Leningrad/134/17/57, A/Leningrad/134/47/57, and A/Ann Arbor/6/60.
In conjunction with the virus-containing compositions, the present invention also provides recombinant nucleic acids which can be used for production of MRE-containing influenza viruses. Thus, in a separate embodiment, the invention provides an isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising an influenza virus sequence containing one or more MRE sequence(s) inserted within said sequence. In a specific embodiment, the nucleic acid of the invention is such that the mean free energy (MFE) of MRE interaction with its corresponding miRNA is less than −20 kcal/mol. In another embodiment, the nucleic acid of the invention is such that the mean free energy (MFE) of MRE interaction with its corresponding miRNA is less than −35 kcal/mol. Further provided herein are the following specific non-limiting examples of the nucleic acid molecules of the invention:
1. A nucleic acid molecule which comprises two MREs which correspond to miR-93 and are inserted into the coding sequence of influenza virus protein NP, wherein the first MRE sequence is at the nucleotide sequence encoding NP amino acids 62-69 and the second MRE sequence is at the nucleotide sequence encoding NP amino acids 258-265. For example, the first MRE sequence can comprise the nucleotide sequence 5′-ACAATTGAACGAATGGTACTTTCT-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 107) and the second MRE sequence can comprise the nucleotide sequence 5′-TTCCTTGCACGGTCAGCACTTATA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 111).
2. A nucleic acid molecule which comprises two MREs which correspond to miR-92 and are inserted into the coding sequence of influenza virus protein NS1, wherein the first MRE sequence is at the nucleotide sequence encoding NS1 amino acids 131-137 and the second MRE sequence is at the nucleotide sequence encoding NS1 amino acids 150-156. For example, the first MRE sequence can comprise the nucleotide sequence 5′-AAGGCCAACTTCAGTGTAATA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 97) and the second MRE sequence can comprise the nucleotide sequence 5′-TTCACCGAGGAAGGTGCAATA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 101).
3. A nucleic acid molecule which comprises three MREs which correspond to miR-92 and are inserted into the coding sequence of influenza virus protein HA, wherein the first MRE sequence is at the nucleotide sequence encoding HA amino acids 68-74, the second MRE sequence is at the nucleotide sequence encoding HA amino acids 195-201, and the third MRE sequence is at the nucleotide sequence encoding HA amino acids 526-532. For example, the first MRE sequence can comprise the nucleotide sequence 5′-CTACAGTTGGGGAAGTGCAAT-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 83), the second MRE sequence can comprise the nucleotide sequence 5′-AACGCCTATGTAAGTGTAGTA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 87), and the third MRE sequence can comprise the nucleotide sequence 5′-TTGGTCAGTTTAGGTGCAATA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 91).
4. The nucleic acid molecule which comprises three MREs which correspond to miR-19 and are inserted into the coding sequence of influenza virus protein HA, wherein the first MRE sequence is at the nucleotide sequence encoding HA amino acids 15-22, the second MRE sequence is at the nucleotide sequence encoding HA amino acids 561-568, and the third MRE sequence is at the nucleotide sequence encoding HA amino acids 327-334. For example, the first MRE sequence can comprise the nucleotide sequence 5′-GCCAGTGCTGACACAATTTGCATA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 45), the second MRE sequence can comprise the nucleotide sequence 5′-TCTTTGCAGTGCAGGATTTGCATA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 49), and the third MRE sequence can comprise the nucleotide sequence 5′-TTGCGUATGGTCACAGGTTTGCGC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 53).
5. The nucleic acid molecule which comprises two MREs which correspond to miR-16 and are inserted into the coding sequence of influenza virus protein HA, wherein the first MRE sequence is at the nucleotide sequence encoding HA amino acids 2-9 and the second MRE sequence is at the nucleotide sequence encoding HA amino acids 439-445. For example, the first MRE sequence can comprise the nucleotide sequence 5′-AAGGCCAACCTATTAGTGCTGCTA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 21) and the second MRE sequence can comprise the nucleotide sequence 5′-AACGCCGAACTATTAGTGCTGCTA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 25).
6. The nucleic acid molecule which comprises three MREs which correspond to miR-34 and are inserted into the coding sequence of influenza virus protein PA, wherein the first MRE sequence is at the nucleotide sequence encoding PA amino acids 426-433, the second MRE sequence is at the nucleotide sequence encoding PA amino acids 634-641, and the third MRE sequence is at the nucleotide sequence encoding PA amino acids 709-716. For example, the first MRE sequence can comprise the nucleotide sequence 5′-GATGAGATCGGTGAAGACGTTGCC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 69), the second MRE sequence can comprise the nucleotide sequence 5′-GGCAAGGTATGTAGGACACTGTTA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 73), and the third MRE sequence can comprise the nucleotide sequence 5′-TTCTTCCTGACTCATGCACTGTCA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 77).
7. The nucleic acid molecule which comprises two MREs which correspond to miR-25 and are inserted into the coding sequence of influenza virus protein M1, wherein the first MRE sequence is at the nucleotide sequence encoding M1 amino acids 111-118 and the second MRE sequence is at the nucleotide sequence encoding M1 amino acids 127-134. For example, the first MRE sequence can comprise the nucleotide sequence 5′-GGTGCCAAAGAGATAAGTGCAAGT-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 59) and the second MRE sequence can comprise the nucleotide sequence 5′-ATATACAACAGGATGGGTGCAGTG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 63).
8. The nucleic acid molecule which comprises three MREs which correspond to miR-17 and are inserted into the coding sequence of influenza virus protein PB 1, wherein the first MRE sequence is at the nucleotide sequence encoding PB1 amino acids 374-381, the second MRE sequence is at the nucleotide sequence encoding PB1 amino acids 418-424, and the third MRE sequence is at the nucleotide sequence encoding PB1 amino acids 677-683. For example, the first MRE sequence can comprise the nucleotide sequence 5′-GCCAGCATTGATCTTAAGTACTTT-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 31), the second MRE sequence can comprise the nucleotide sequence 5′-GTGTTGGGTGTAAGCATTTTG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 35), and the third MRE sequence can comprise the nucleotide sequence 5′-ACCAGCCAAAGAGGCGTTTTG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 39).
9. The nucleic acid molecule which comprises four MREs which correspond to miR-142 and are inserted into an artificial 3′ UTR of influenza virus protein NP, wherein the MRE sequence is found between the viral stop codon and the polyA tail sequence. For example, the repetitive four MREs can comprise the nucleotide sequence 5′-TCCATAAAGTAGGAAACACTACA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 159).
10. The nucleic acid molecule which comprises four MREs which correspond to miR-142 and are inserted into an artificial 3′ UTR of influenza virus protein NS1, wherein the MRE sequence is found between the viral stop codon and the polyA tail sequence but before a duplicated NS2/NEP ORF. For example, the repetitive four MREs can comprise the nucleotide sequence 5′-TCCATAAAGTAGGAAACACTACA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 159).
Influenza nucleotide and amino acid positions provided in the above specific examples correspond to Influenza A virus strain A/Puerto Rico/8/34/Mount Sinai (H1N1). Specifically, these positions correspond to the following GenBank Accession Numbers:
In a specific embodiment, the recombinant viruses of the invention further comprise additional attenuating mutations. In one embodiment, such mutation results in a temperature-sensitive viral propagation (e.g., a mutation which is used in FLUMIST). In another embodiment, such mutation, is the removal of a pathogenic factor (e.g., removal of NS1 protein).
In a preferred embodiment, the composition of the invention is a vaccine composition. Such vaccine composition may further comprise an adjuvant.
In conjunction with the vaccine compositions, the present invention also provides a method of inducing a protective immune response to an influenza infection in an animal, said method comprising administering to said animal the MRE-containing recombinant influenza vaccine composition of the invention. In a preferred embodiment, the animal is human. In another embodiment, the animal is a bird (e.g., water fowl or chicken). In yet another embodiment, the animal is a pig. In a specific embodiment, the vaccine composition is administered mucosally. In another specific embodiment, the vaccine composition is administered conjointly with an adjuvant.
The present invention is based on the unexpected discovery that effective and safe live attenuated viral vaccines can be generated that exploit a cell's microRNA (miRNA) processing machinery to induce viral attenuation in a species-specific and/or tissue/cell-specific manner. Specifically, the present invention provides novel live attenuated influenza virus (LAIV) vaccines comprising one or more miRNA Response Elements (MRE) inserted within a coding region and/or an artificial 3′ UTR of one or more influenza virus genes.
miRNAs are small 19-25 base pair (bp) endogenous single stranded RNAs that regulate the expression of target mRNAs either by mRNA cleavage, translational repression/inhibition or heterochromatic silencing and thus affect global protein production. Baek et al., Nature 455(7209):64 (2008); Selbach et al., Nature 455(7209):58 (2008); Ambros, 2004, Nature, 431, 350-355; Bartel, 2004, Cell, 116, 281-297; Cullen, 2004, Virus Research., 102, 3-9; He et al., 2004, Nat. Rev. Genet., 5, 522-531; and Ying et al., 2004, Gene, 342, 25-28. miRNAs regulate target mRNAs via a 7 bp “seed” sequence (i.e., sequence at 5′ positions 1-7 or 2-8 of miRNA). Complementarity of an mRNA sequence to the “seed” is normally found in the 3′ untranslated region (3′ UTR). Bartel, Cell 116(2):281 (2004).
MREs corresponding to tissue-restricted miRNAs have been inserted into pre-existing untranslated regions (UTRs) of lentiviruses, picornoviruses, and rhabdoviruses to achieve tissue-specific viral attenuation. Brown et al., Nature Medicine 12(5):585 (2006); Barnes et al., Cell Host & Microbe 4(3):239 (2008); and Kelly et al., Nature Medicine 14(11):1278 (2008).
Although these strategies lead to viral attenuation in particular tissues, their application for influenza vaccine production is hindered by the fact that influenza virus does not produce 3′ UTRs that are of sufficient length for MRE insertion, where MREs are most effective, and any addition or change to the RNA ends of the influenza viral genomic segments results in replication and packaging defects. Muramoto et al., J. Virol. 80(5):2318 (2006). Furthermore, since untranslated sequences are subject to less selective pressure than protein coding sequences, as evident by the greater degree of evolutionary conservation in protein coding sequences, insertion of MREs into non-coding regions creates a high chance of emergence of “escape” mutants making such recombinant viruses unsafe for vaccine production.
The present invention constitutes a novel approach which overcomes the deficiencies of applying any previously described attenuation strategies for the generation of influenza A virus vaccines. This approach is based upon the incorporation of one or more species-specific and/or tissue/cell-specific MREs into strategic locations within the influenza virus genome (preferably, within viral protein coding sequences or within artificial 3′ UTRs [generated, e.g., by the duplication of the viral packaging sequence and genetic insertion between the stop codon and the poly A tail]), which results in species-specific and/or tissue/cell-specific viral attenuation. By employing MREs corresponding to miRNAs that are highly expressed in cells and tissues targeted by influenza virus in an animal to be vaccinated but are not expressed or are expressed at very low levels in embryonated chicken eggs or cell lines used for large-scale vaccine production, high viral titers may be achieved during vaccine production with the retention of viral attenuation in cells expressing a cognate miRNA. Insertion of MREs within influenza coding regions prevents generation of escape mutants and thus increases vaccine safety.
The MREs useful for the present invention can be derived from any miRNA which is highly expressed in influenza-targeted cells (including, e.g., epithelial, secretory [Clara], ciliated, apical, goblet [mucous], bronchial, hematopoietic [e.g., dendritic cells, macrophages, lymphocytes], and other cells of the lung and upper respiratory tract targeted by the influenza virus) of an animal in need of vaccination (e.g., human) but are not expressed or are expressed at very low levels in species (e.g., embryonated chicken eggs [Gallus gallus]) or a cell line used for large-scale vaccine production.
Examples of useful human miRNAs include without limitation miR-16, miR-17, miR-19, miR-25, miR-34, miR-92, miR-93, miR-142, miR-222, miR-149, miR-1977, miR-181b-2, miR-1259, and miR-1978 such as miR-16 having sequence 5′-UAGCAGCACGUAAAUAUUGGCG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 1), miR-17 having sequence 5′-CAAAGUGCUUACAGUGCAGGUAG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 2), miR-19 having sequence 5′-UGUGCAAAUCUAUGCAAAACUGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 3), miR-25 having sequence 5′-CAUUGCACUUGUCUCGGUCUGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 4), miR-34 having sequence 5′-UGGCAGUGUCUUAGCUGGUUGU-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 5), miR-92 having sequence 5′-UAUUGCACUUGUCCCGGCCUG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 6), and miR-93 having sequence 5′-CAAAGUGCUGUUCGUGCAGGUAG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 7). miR-142 having sequence 5′-UGUAGUGUUUCCUACUUUAUGGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 141), miR-222 having sequence 5′-AGCUACAUCUGGCUACUGGU-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 142), miR-149 having sequence 5′-UCUGGUCCGUGUCUUCACUCCC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 143), miR-1977 having sequence 5′-GAUUAGGGUGCUUAGCUGUUAA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 144), miR-181b-2 having sequence 5′-AACAUUCAUUGCUGUCGGUGGGU-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 145), miR-1259 having sequence 5′-AUAUAUGAUGACUUAGCUUUU-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 146), and miR-1978 having sequence 5′-GGUUUGGUCCUAGCCUUUCUA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 147). Additional useful miRNAs can be identified by parallel sequencing and determination of the relative expression levels between the two species or tissues/cells. See the current database of miRNA sequences (miRBase) on the WorldWideWeb at mirbase.org (miRBase) and Burside et al., BMC Genomics 9:185 (2008); Williams et al., BMC Genomics 8:172 (2007); Landgraf et al., Cell 129:1401 (2007).
In a preferred embodiment, at least two MREs are inserted in an influenza genomic segment. Such two or more MREs can have identical sequences, can differ in several nucleotide positions while maintaining the same MRE seed sequence (i.e., 5′ positions 1-7 or 2-8 of the miRNA sequence), or can even correspond to two or more different miRNAs, wherein each miRNA is highly expressed in influenza-targeted cells of an animal in need of vaccination but are not expressed or are expressed at very low levels in the regions where viral propagation occurs within embryonated chicken eggs or a cell line used for large-scale vaccine production. Such two or more MREs can be inserted regardless of reading frame so long as the number of amino acid changes is kept to a minimum to preserve the viral protein function.
According to the present invention, the MRE(s) are preferably inserted within a protein coding region of an influenza virus gene. Insertion of MRE(s) within coding region(s) (as opposed to non-coding regions such as 5′ or 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs)) prevents generation of escape mutants and thus increases vaccine safety. While all influenza genes can be used for MRE insertion, it is preferable to use open reading frames of the influenza proteins which are more conserved, because it makes the emergence of escape mutants less likely and increases the safety of the vaccine. Thus, the preferred influenza genes for MRE insertion are PB1, PB2, PA, M1, M2, NP, NS1 and NEP.
The present invention also encompasses MRE insertions in other parts of influenza genome. In one specific embodiment, the invention provides MRE insertion in an artificial 3′ UTR whereby MREs is inserted between the stop codon and the poly A tail sequence of the resulting viral mRNA. In one embodiment, such MRE insertion between the stop codon and the poly A tail sequence is accompanied by further adding sequences required for efficient viral strand packaging into the virion.
An MRE of the present invention is preferably 19-25 nucleotides long and contains a perfect complement of at least the “seed” sequence of the corresponding miRNA (i.e., 5′ positions 1-7 or 2-8 of the miRNA sequence). Any additional complementarity can be used to further increase attenuation. Alternatively (or in addition), the attenuation may be enhanced by increasing the number of inserted MREs.
The MREs according to the invention can be designed, for example, by using partial or complete inverted and complementary sequence of the miRNA of interest whereby the miRNA can bind by standard Watson:Crick base pairing the nucleotides comprising the MRE. The use of shorter regions of complementarity increases the number of potential sites and reduces the number of needed nucleotide changes. Complementarity on the 3′ end of the MRE (the seed sequence) should be maintained from position 1-7 or 2-8 at a minimum.
The live attenuated MRE-containing viruses of the invention can be produced recombinantly in cultured cells (e.g., in human embryonic kidney HEK-293 cells [ATCC Catalog No. CRL-1573], chicken fibroblasts DF1 [ATCC Catalog No. CRL-12203], Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MCK) cells [ATCC Catalog Nos. CCL-34, CRL-2285, CRL-2286, CRL-2935, or CRL-2936], African green monkey kidney cells (Vero) [ATCC Catalog Nos. CCL-81, CRL-1586, CRL-1587, or CRL-2783], or human PER-C6 cells [Pau et al., Vaccine, 2001, 19(17-19):2716]) followed (if needed) by propagation in embryonated chicken eggs to obtain higher titers.
As disclosed in the Examples section, below, the H1N1- and H5N1-based attenuated influenza virus vaccines of the invention comprising two MREs corresponding to miR-93 inserted in NP open reading frame exhibit high stability (no revertants) when propagated in cell culture and produce protection from lethal dose of H1N1 and H5N1 respectively, when administered to mice.
Taken together, the novel MRE-based live attenuated vaccine strategy of the present invention provides the versatility, safety, and efficacy required for rapid generation of large quantities of vaccines for newly emerging influenza strains.
In a more general aspect, the present invention is applicable to any virus amenable to recombinant production. By insertion of species-specific and/or tissue/cell-specific MREs into viral genomes, the present invention allows generation of viruses which can be used as live attenuated vaccines in one species and/or tissue/cell and can be efficiently propagated in another species and/or tissue/cell.
The term “influenza virus” is used herein to define a viral species of which pathogenic strains cause the disease known as influenza or flu. The term influenza is meant to include any strain or serotype of the influenza virus, including any combination of HA, e.g., H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, H6, H7, H8, H9, H10, H11, H12, H13, H14, H15, H16; and NA, e.g., N1, N2, N3, N4, N5, N6, N7, N8 or N9 genes. In one embodiment, influenza refers to H5N1 influenza (bird flu or pandemic influenza). In one embodiment, influenza refers to other strains or subtypes of the influenza virus, including but not limited to H1N1, H2N2, and H3N2.
In the context of influenza virus biology, “coding region” refers to areas of viral RNA which encode amino acids that are represented in the mature viral proteins.
The terms “microRNA” or “miRNA” as used herein refer to a small 19-25 bp endogenous single stranded RNA that regulates the expression of target mRNAs via a 7 bp “seed” sequence (i.e., sequence at 5′ positions 1-7 or 2-8 of miRNA). Complementarity of an mRNA sequence to the “seed” is normally found in the 3′ untranslated region (3′ UTR). Bartel, Cell 116(2):281 (2004). miRNA regulation moderately affects global protein production resulting in a “fine tuning” of the cellular transcriptome. Baek et al., Nature 455(7209):64 (2008) and Selbach et al., Nature 455(7209):58 (2008).
The term “complementarity” means that a nucleic acid can form hydrogen bond(s) with another nucleic acid sequence by either traditional Watson-Crick or other non-traditional types of interactions such as Wobble-base pairing which permits binding of guanine and uracil. A percent complementarity indicates the percentage of residues in a nucleic acid molecule that can form hydrogen bonds with a second nucleic acid sequence.
In reference to the nucleic acid molecules of the present invention, the binding free energy for a nucleic acid molecule with its complementary sequence is sufficient to allow the relevant function of the nucleic acid to proceed, e.g., miRNA activity. Determination of binding free energies for nucleic acid molecules is well known in the art (see, e.g., Turner et al., 1987, CSH Symp. Quant. Biol. LII pp. 123-133; Frier et al., 1986, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 83:9373-9377; Turner et al., 1987, J Am. Chem. Soc. 109:3783-3785). “Perfectly complementary” means that all the contiguous residues of a nucleic acid sequence will hydrogen bond with the same number of contiguous residues in a second nucleic acid sequence. In one embodiment, the human miRNA has partial complementarity (i.e., less than 100% complementarity) with the corresponding target influenza nucleic acid molecule.
The term “microRNA (miRNA) Response Element” or “MRE” is used herein to refer to a nucleotide sequence within an mRNA that can bind to a specific miRNA and result in a measurable amount of post-transcriptional silencing of such mRNA (determined, e.g., by a decrease in mRNA and/or protein content). For post-transcriptional silencing to occur, MRE-miRNA sequence complementarity should, at minimum, include the seed sequence of the miRNA with is comprised of nucleotides 1-7 or 2-8 and the 3′ end of the MRE.
As specified herein, the species-specific and/or tissue/cell-specific MRE useful in the recombinant attenuated viruses of the invention can be derived from any miRNA which is highly expressed in influenza-targeted cells of an animal in need of vaccination but are not expressed or are expressed at very low levels in species (e.g., embryonated chicken eggs [Gallus gallus]) or cell lines used for large-scale vaccine production. Within the meaning of the present invention, “tissue/cell- and species-specific MREs” are defined as those MREs that bind, and are post-transcriptionally inhibited by, miRNAs which are expressed at high levels in a particular cell or tissue type targeted by the relevant virus in an animal to be vaccinated and/or miRNAs which are expressed at high levels in a select species to be vaccinated, but are not expressed or are expressed at very low levels in a cell line or species used for a large-scale vaccine production.
The terms “highly expressed” and “expressed at high levels” as used herein in conjunction with miRNA expression refer to miRNAs that are detectable by standard Northern blot analysis (Pall et al., Nature Protocols 3(6) 1077 (2008)). Preferably, such highly expressed miRNAs represent greater than or equal to 0.1% of the total cellular miRNA found in the tissue or cell of interest as measured by RNA deep sequencing (Hafner et al., Methods 44(1)3 (2008)).
The term “expressed at very low levels” as used herein refers to those miRNAs that are undetectable by standard Northern blot analysis. Preferably, such miRNAs expressed at very low levels represent equal to or less than 0.01% of the total cellular miRNA found in the tissue or cell of interest as measured by RNA deep sequencing.
The terms “artificial 3′UTR” and “artificial 3′ non-coding region (NCR)” as used herein in connection with recombinant attenuated influenza viruses refer to an insertion of a genetic element that is encoded in the mature RNA transcript but does not encode any protein information. “Artificial” refers to the fact that influenza viruses does not encode endogenous 3′ UTRs capable of MRE insertion and therefore, the only means of utilizing this target location for MRE insertion is to generate a novel 3′ UTR/NCR. Artificial 3′ UTRs/NCRs in the recombinant attenuated influenza viruses of the present invention can be generated by the introduction of genetic material between the stop codon and the poly A tail. Furthermore, because all influenza viral segments have packaging information encoded within the 5′ end of the vRNA (which overlaps with the genetic information encoding the stop codon and poly A tail), artificial 3′ UTRs also demand the duplication of the 5′ vRNA end. In this instance, the required material (usually 80 nt-200 nt depending on the segment), can be duplicated and inserted just beyond the poly A tail sequence.
As used herein, the term “infectious” refers to the ability of a virus to replicate in a cell and produce viral particles. Infectivity can be evaluated either by detecting virus, (i.e., viral load), or by observing disease progression in an animal.
An “individual” or “subject” or “animal”, as used herein, refers to vertebrates that support a negative strand RNA virus infection, specifically influenza virus infection, including, but not limited to, birds (such as water fowl and chickens) and members of the mammalian species, such as canine, feline, lupine, mustela, rodent (racine, murine, etc.), equine, bovine, ovine, caprine, porcine species, and primates, the latter including humans. In a specific embodiment, the subject is a ferret, which is a good animal model for studying influenza. In another embodiment, the subject is a human.
As used herein, the term “immunogenic” means that an agent is capable of eliciting a humoral or cellular immune response, and preferably both. An immunogenic entity is also antigenic. An immunogenic composition is a composition that elicits a humoral or cellular immune response, or both, when administered to an animal having an immune system.
The term “vaccine” refers to a composition (e.g., a live attenuated influenza virus with or without an adjuvant) that can be used to elicit protective immunity in a recipient. It should be noted that to be effective, a vaccine of the invention can elicit immunity in a portion of the immunized population, as some individuals may fail to mount a robust or protective immune response, or, in some cases, any immune response. This inability may stem from the individual's genetic background or because of an immunodeficiency condition (either acquired or congenital) or immunosuppression (e.g., due to treatment with chemotherapy or use of immunosuppressive drugs). Vaccine efficacy can be established in animal models.
The term “adjuvant” refers to a compound or composition that augments the host's immune response to another antigen (e.g., live attenuated influenza virus) when administered conjointly with that antigen. Adjuvants useful in the vaccine compositions of the present invention include, but are not limited to, complete Freund's adjuvant, incomplete Freund's adjuvant, saponin, mineral gels such as aluminum hydroxide, surface active substances such as lysolecithin, pluronic polyols, polyanions, peptides, oil or hydrocarbon emulsions, keyhole limpet hemocyanins, N-acetyl-muramyl-L-threonyl-D-isoglutamine (thr-MDP), N-acetyl-nor-muramyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutamine, N-acetylmuramyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutaminyl-L-alanine-2-(1′-2′-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-hydroxyphosphoryloxy)-ethylamine, Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG), and Corynebacterium parvum. Preferably, the adjuvant is pharmaceutically acceptable.
Within the meaning of the present invention, the term “conjoint administration” is used to refer to administration of an immune adjuvant and an antigen simultaneously in one composition, or simultaneously in different compositions, or sequentially within a specified time period (e.g., 24 hours).
The term “protect” is used herein to mean prevent or treat, or both, as appropriate, development or continuance of a disease (e.g., flu) in a subject.
The terms “protective immune response” or “protective immunity” comprise a humoral (antibody) immunity or cellular immunity, or both, effective to, e.g., eliminate or reduce the load of a pathogen (e.g., influenza virus) or infected cell or produce any other measurable alleviation of the infection in an immunized (vaccinated) subject.
The term “therapeutically effective amount/dose” is used herein interchangeably with the term “immunogenically effective amount/dose” and refers to that quantity of a live attenuated influenza virus or a pharmaceutical composition or vaccine comprising such virus that is sufficient to produce a protective immune response upon administration to a mammal.
The phrase “pharmaceutically acceptable” refers to molecular entities and compositions that are physiologically tolerable and do not typically produce an allergic or similar untoward reaction, such as gastric upset, dizziness and the like, when administered to a human. Preferably, as used herein, the term “pharmaceutically acceptable” means approved by a regulatory agency of the Federal or a state government or listed in the U.S. Pharmacopeia or other generally recognized pharmacopeia for use in animals, and more particularly in humans.
The term “carrier” applied to pharmaceutical or vaccine compositions of the invention refers to a diluent, excipient, or vehicle with which a compound (e.g., a live attenuated influenza virus) is administered. Such pharmaceutical carriers can be sterile liquids, such as water and oils, including those of petroleum, animal, vegetable or synthetic origin, such as peanut oil, soybean oil, mineral oil, sesame oil and the like. Water or aqueous solution, saline solutions, and aqueous dextrose and glycerol solutions are preferably employed as carriers, particularly for injectable solutions. Suitable pharmaceutical carriers are described in “Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences” by E. W. Martin, 18th Edition.
As used herein, the term “isolated” means that the referenced material (e.g., a cell or virus) is removed from its native environment. Thus, an isolated biological material can be free of some or all cellular components, i.e., components of the cells in which the native material occurs naturally (e.g., cytoplasmic or membrane component). A material shall be deemed isolated if it is present in a cell extract or supernatant. In the case of nucleic acid molecules, an isolated nucleic acid includes, without limitation, a PCR product, an isolated RNA (e.g., mRNA or miRNA), a DNA (e.g., cDNA), or a restriction fragment. In another embodiment, an isolated nucleic acid is preferably excised from the cellular or viral genome in which it may be found, and, e.g., is no longer joined or proximal to other genes or regulatory sequences located upstream or downstream of this nucleic acid. In yet another embodiment, the isolated nucleic acid lacks one or more introns. Isolated nucleic acid molecules include sequences inserted into plasmids, cosmids, artificial chromosomes, and the like, i.e., when it forms part of a chimeric recombinant nucleic acid construct. Thus, in a specific embodiment, a recombinant nucleic acid is an isolated nucleic acid. An isolated protein may be associated with other proteins or nucleic acids, or both, with which it associates in the cell, or with cellular membranes if it is a membrane-associated protein. An isolated organelle, cell, or tissue is removed from the anatomical site in which it is found in an organism. An isolated material may be, but need not be, purified.
The term “purified” as used herein refers to material that has been isolated under conditions that reduce or eliminate the presence of unrelated materials, i.e., contaminants, including native materials from which the material is obtained. For example, a purified virus is preferably substantially free of host cell or culture components, including tissue culture or egg proteins, non-specific pathogens, and the like. As used herein, the term “substantially free” is used operationally, in the context of analytical testing of the material. Preferably, purified material substantially free of contaminants is at least 50% pure; more preferably, at least 90% pure, and still more preferably at least 99% pure. Purity can be evaluated by chromatography, gel electrophoresis, immunoassay, composition analysis, biological assay, and other methods known in the art.
Methods for purification are well-known in the art. Viral particles can be purified by ultrafiltration through sucrose cushions or by ultracentrifugation, preferably continuous centrifugation (see Furminger, In: Nicholson, Webster and May (eds.), Textbook of Influenza, Chapter 24, pp. 324-332). Other purification methods are possible and contemplated herein. A purified material may contain less than about 50%, preferably less than about 75%, and most preferably less than about 90%, of the cellular components, media, proteins, or other undesirable components or impurities (as context requires), with which it was originally associated. The term “substantially pure” indicates the highest degree of purity which can be achieved using conventional purification techniques known in the art.
The term “about” or “approximately” means within a statistically meaningful range of a value. Such a range can be within an order of magnitude, preferably within 50%, more preferably within 20%, still more preferably within 10%, and even more preferably within 5% of a given value or range. The allowable variation encompassed by the term “about” or “approximately” depends on the particular system under study, and can be readily appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art.
In accordance with the present invention there may be employed conventional molecular biology, microbiology, and recombinant DNA techniques within the skill of the art. Such techniques are explained fully in the literature. See, e.g., Sambrook, Fritsch & Maniatis, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Second Edition. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1989 (herein “Sambrook et al., 1989”); DNA Cloning: A Practical Approach, Volumes I and II (D. N. Glover ed. 1985); Oligonucleotide Synthesis (M. J. Gait ed. 1984); Nucleic Acid Hybridization [B. D. Hames & S. J. Higgins eds. (1985)]; Transcription And Translation [B. D. Hames & S. J. Higgins, eds. (1984)]; Animal Cell Culture [R. I. Freshney, ed. (1986)]; Immobilized Cells And Enzymes [IRL Press, (1986)]; B. Perbal, A Practical Guide To Molecular Cloning (1984); Ausubel, F. M. et al. (eds.). Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1994. These techniques include site directed mutagenesis as described in Kunkel, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82: 488-492 (1985), U.S. Pat. No. 5,071,743, Fukuoka et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 263: 357-360 (1999); Kim and Maas, BioTech. 28: 196-198 (2000); Parikh and Guengerich, BioTech. 24: 428-431 (1998); Ray and Nickoloff, BioTech. 13: 342-346 (1992); Wang et al., BioTech. 19: 556-559 (1995); Wang and Malcolm, BioTech. 26: 680-682 (1999); Xu and Gong, BioTech. 26: 639-641 (1999), U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,789,166 and 5,932,419, Hogrefe, Strategies 14. 3: 74-75 (2001), U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,702,931, 5,780,270, and 6,242,222, Angag and Schutz, Biotech. 30: 486-488 (2001), Wang and Wilkinson, Biotech. 29: 976-978 (2000), Kang et al., Biotech. 20: 44-46 (1996), Ogel and McPherson, Protein Engineer. 5: 467-468 (1992), Kirsch and Joly, Nuc. Acids. Res. 26: 1848-1850 (1998), Rhem and Hancock, J. Bacteriol. 178: 3346-3349 (1996), Boles and Miogsa, Curr. Genet. 28: 197-198 (1995), Barrenttino et al., Nuc. Acids. Res. 22: 541-542 (1993), Tessier and Thomas, Meths. Molec. Biol. 57: 229-237, and Pons et al., Meth. Molec. Biol. 67: 209-218.
The present invention is exemplified by the incorporation of two ubiquitous MREs for miR-93 into the open reading frame (ORF) of the conserved influenza nucleocapsid (NP) protein to yield a highly attenuated influenza virus vaccine strain. As discussed below, the NP gene is characterized by little genetic drift between strains thus making the emergence of escape mutants unlikely. It will be understood, however, that MREs may be incorporated within coding or non-coding (e.g., artificial 3′UTRs) regions of other influenza mRNAs. While all influenza genes can be used for MRE insertion, it is preferable to use ORFs of the influenza proteins which are more conserved, because it makes the emergence of escape mutants less likely and increases the safety of the vaccine. Thus, the preferred influenza genes for MRE insertion are PB1, PB2, PA, M1, M2, NP, NS1 and NEP.
While one MRE may be sufficient for creating an effective LAIV vaccine, it is preferable to use at least two MREs to ensure an efficient attenuation in vaccinated animals and to decrease the possibility of escape mutants. Such two or more MREs can have an identical sequence or can differ in several nucleotide positions or can even correspond to two or more different miRNAs, wherein each miRNA is highly expressed in tissues/cells targeted by influenza viruses in animals to be vaccinated but is not expressed or is expressed at very low levels in species and/or tissues/cells used for large-scale vaccine production (e.g., regions where viral propagation occurs within embryonated chicken eggs [e.g., chorioallantoic membrane] or a suitable cell line [e.g., MDCK cells]). Such two or more MREs can be inserted into one or more positions in the influenza virus genome.
Incorporation of MRE sequences within the coding regions can be achieved by altering the coding region of an influenza virus gene with the goal of minimizing nucleotide sequence changes, in particular those nucleotide sequence changes that result in amino acid substitutions. Thus, the original identity of the amino acid is typically retained; however, if an amino acid substitution is required, it is preferred that it conform to the same hierarchical clustering (e.g., nonpolar (G, A, V, L, M, I); polar (S, T, C, P, N, E); aromatic (F, Y, W); positively charged (K, R, H); or negatively charged (D, E)).
Nucleotide changes can be introduced using any of the methods of site directed mutagenesis known in the art. See, e.g., Kunkel, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82: 488-492 (1985), U.S. Pat. No. 5,071,743, Fukuoka et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 263: 357-360 (1999); Kim and Maas, BioTech. 28: 196-198 (2000); Parikh and Guengerich, BioTech. 24: 428-431 (1998); Ray and Nickoloff, BioTech. 13: 342-346 (1992); Wang et al., BioTech. 19: 556-559 (1995); Wang and Malcolm, BioTech. 26: 680-682 (1999); Xu and Gong, BioTech. 26: 639-641 (1999), U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,789,166 and 5,932,419, Hogrefe, Strategies 14. 3: 74-75 (2001), U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,702,931, 5,780,270, and 6,242,222, Angag and Schutz, Biotech. 30: 486-488 (2001), Wang and Wilkinson, Biotech. 29: 976-978 (2000), Kang et al., Biotech. 20: 44-46 (1996), Ogel and McPherson, Protein Engineer. 5: 467-468 (1992), Kirsch and Joly, Nuc. Acids. Res. 26: 1848-1850 (1998), Rhem and Hancock, J. Bacteriol. 178: 3346-3349 (1996), Boles and Miogsa, Curr. Genet. 28: 197-198 (1995), Barrenttino et al., Nuc. Acids. Res. 22: 541-542 (1993), Tessier and Thomas, Meths. Molec. Biol. 57: 229-237, and Pons et al., Meth. Molec. Biol. 67: 209-218.
For efficient attenuation, MRE sequence needs to be perfectly complementary to at least the miRNA “seed” sequence (i.e., miRNA 5′ and MRE 3′ nucleotides 1-7 or 2-8). Any additional complementarity helps further enhance viral attenuation. The MREs according to the invention can be designed, e.g., by using partial or complete inverted and complementary sequence of the miRNA of interest. The use of shorter regions of complementarity increases the number of potential sites and reduces the number of needed nucleotide changes.
RNA binding provides the ability to substitute cytosine (C) with uracil (U) and adenosine (A) with guanine (G) and still maintain a favorable mean free energy (MFE). Crick, J Mol Biol 19(2):548-555 (1966). As a result, codons such as 5′-UCU-3′ (which encodes for Serine (S)) and 5′-UUU-3′ (which encodes for phenylalanine (F)) can both hybridize to 5′-AGA-3′. Therefore, MRE targeting miRNA 5′-AGA-3′ sequence, could be inserted in the influenza sequence that codes for either S or F. Examples of this are further depicted in Table 1.
For example, for miR-16 sequence: 5′-UAGCAGCACGUAAAUAUUGGCG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 1), the minimal “seed” sequence can be viewed as either 5′-UAGCAGCAC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 8) or 5′-AGCAGCAGC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 9) making the complementary MRE sequence 5′-GTGCTGCTA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 10) or 5′-CGTGCTGCTA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 11). Substituting cytosine (C) with uracil (U) and/or adenosine (A) with guanine (G) in each of these putative MRE sequences allows any open reading frame that encodes for VLL, RAA, RVV, RAV, RVA, CAA, CVV, CAV, or CVA to be manipulated to become responsive to miR-16.
In the specific examples provided herein, the viral sequences are derived from Influenza A virus strain A/Puerto Rico/8/34/Mount Sinai(H1N1). Specifically, the specified nucleotide and amino acid positions correspond to the following GenBank Accession Nos.:
For each example, the mean free energy (MFE) may be further decreased by non-hierarchical amino acid substitutions (e.g., as described below for miR-93). Ideally, MFE of an MRE/miRNA interaction will be less than −20 kcal/mol, less than −25 kcal/mol, less than −30 kcal/mol, or less than −35 kcal/mol. For MFE calculation methods, see Dawson and Yamamoto, J. Theor. Biol., 1999, 201(2): 113-140.
It will be understood, however, that nucleotide substitutions that result in rare codon triplets such as ACG, UCG, CGU, or CGA (Lamer et al. Gene 345:127-138 (2005)) should be avoided unless this triplet is already represented in the viral region used for MRE insertion.
As exemplified herein, for influenza NP, it was found that positions 225 (site one) and 818 (site two) of segment five exhibit a high degree of sequence similarity to MRE sequences for miR-93. Thus, the sequence 5′-ACAAUAGAGAGAAUGGUGCUCUCU-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 12) at site one was replaced with 5′-ACACUUGAACGAAUGGUACUUUCU-3 (SEQ ID NO: 13) to create influenza 93NP1 and the sequence 5′-UUUCUAGCACGGUCUGCACUCAUA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 14) at site two was replaced with 5′-UUCCUUGCACGGACAGCACUU UUA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 15) to create influenza 93NP2.
Tables 2-9, below, depict exemplary influenza A coding regions that can be modified at the nucleotide sequence level (without causing any changes in the target influenza amino acid sequences) to incorporate two or more MREs. Each of the disclosed MRE pairs or triplets is achieved by minimizing nucleotide sequence changes and by restricting amino acid substitutions according to the parameters depicted in Table 1, above.
The MREs useful for the present invention can be derived, e.g., from any miRNA which is highly expressed in mammalian (e.g., human) cells (including, e.g., epithelial, secretory [Clara], ciliated, apical, goblet [mucous], hematopoeitic [e.g., dendritic cells, macrophages, lymphocytes], bronchial, and other cells of the lung and upper respiratory tract targeted by the influenza virus) but is not expressed or is expressed at very low levels in the regions where viral propagation occurs within embryonated chicken eggs (Gallus gallus) or a cell line used for vaccine production (e.g. MDCK cells [e.g., ATCC Catalog No. CCL-34]). This allows efficient vaccine production in ovo or in vitro but renders the vaccine virus susceptible to attenuation in mammalian (e.g., human) cells expressing a cognate miRNA.
Table 10 shows relative data of miRNA expression in the allantoic membrane of 10 day old chicken (Gallus gallus) eggs versus human A549 lung epithelial cells. It is based on high throughput parallel sequencing of more than 3000000 assembled sequences (“reads”) formed by ligating RNA adaptors to purified cellular RNAs. The percent given represents the total number of miRNA specific reads divided by the total number of miRNA reads.
Based on the above data, miR-16, miR-17, miR-19, miR-25, miR-34, miR-92, and miR-93 represent strong candidates for the generation of mammalian-specific, MRE-containing LAIV vaccines.
Additional useful miRNAs can be identified by parallel sequencing and determination of the relative expression levels between the two species, tissues, or cell lines of interest. See the current database of miRNA sequences on the WorldWideWeb at mirbase.org (miRBase).
The recombinant LAIV of the present invention can further comprise additional attenuating mutations, including, e.g., mutations which result in a temperature-sensitive viral propagation (e.g., a mutation which is used in FLUMIST) and removal of a pathogenic factor (e.g., removal of NS1 protein).
After the generation of MRE-containing recombinant constructs, live attenuated MRE-containing viruses of the invention can be produced recombinantly in cultured cells (e.g., in human embryonic kidney HEK-293 cells [ATCC Catalog No. CRL-1573], chicken fibroblasts DF1 [ATCC Catalog No. CRL-12203], Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MCK) cells [ATCC Catalog Nos. CCL-34, CRL-2285, CRL-2286, CRL-2935, or CRL-2936], African green monkey kidney cells (Vero) [ATCC Catalog Nos. CCL-81, CRL-1586, CRL-1587, or CRL-2783], human PER-C6 cells (Pau et al. Vaccine 19(17-19) 2716, (2001)), chicken fibroblasts DF1 [ATCC Catalog No. CRL-12203]. Production in cell lines may be followed by propagation in embryonated chicken eggs to obtain higher titers.
At each step, viral particles can be purified, e.g., by ultrafiltration or ultracentrifugation, preferably continuous centrifugation (see Furminger, In: Nicholson, Webster and May (eds.), Textbook of Influenza, Chapter 24, pp. 324-332). Viral titers can be determined by plaque assay, tissue culture infectious dose, egg infectious dose, hemagglutination inhibition, or by antibody-dependent fluorescence. Huprikar et al., J Virol Methods, 1980, 1(2):117-120, Rimmelzwaan et al., J Virol Methods. 1998, 74(1): 57-66.
The recombinant attenuated influenza viruses of the invention can be derived from various influenza genetic backgrounds, including without limitation, H5N1 virus (e.g., A/Vietnam/1203/04, A/chicken/Scotland/59, A/duck/Hong Kong/308/78), H1N1 virus (e.g., A/PuertoRico/8/1934, A/NewYork/616/1995, A/California/04/2009), H3N2 virus (e.g., A/HongKong/16/68, A/USSR/039/68, A/Yokohama/C5/85), or any other influenza A virus, including cold-adapted strains A/Leningrad/134/17/57, A/Leningrad/134/47/57 and A/Ann Arbor/6/60.
The recombinant attenuated influenza viruses of the invention can be made in cultured cells by any means known to those of skill in the art, including through a genetic engineering method such as the “plasmid only” system wherein the plasmid-driven expression of eight influenza vRNAs from a pol I promoter and all mRNAs from a pol II promoter results in the formation of an infectious influenza virus (Hoffmann et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97:6108; Hoffmann et al., Vaccine 2002, 20:3165; U.S. Pat. No. 6,951,754; Quinlivan et al., J. Virol. 79(13):8431 (2005)). In order to avoid attenuation during viral propagation in mammalian cells, the MRE-containing plasmid is driven only by RNA pol I to produce vRNA containing the MRE in an inverse, and therefore ineffective, orientation and another plasmid (not containing the MRE) is driven only by RNA pol II promoter to produce a wild-type mRNA. For example, as specified in the Example 11, below, to produce recombinant attenuated influenza viruses containing MRE in the NP open reading frame, the inventors used one plasmid (pCAGGs NP) driven only by RNA pol II promoter to produce wild type NP mRNA and another plasmid (pPol I MRE-encoded NP) driven only by RNA pol I to produce vRNA containing MRE in the NP open reading frame.
In an alternative method, the MRE-containing vRNA segment of interest can be overexpressed and then the cell can be infected with a viral strain of interest at a very low multiplicity of infection (MOD, e.g., 1 virus/100 cells. Overexpression of the viral segment of interest will result in its incorporation. Following inoculation in eggs, the heterogenous viruses can be plaque purified and can be distinguished from the wild-type virus by plaque size in cultured cells. Alternatively, additional selection pressure can be added during rescue by transfecting a short interfering RNA (siRNA) targeted to only the wild-type—unmodified strand. This would select for recombinants only.
In order to achieve a large-scale virus production, supernatant and/or cultured cells used for the initial virus production can be injected into 10-day old embryonated chicken eggs. Alternatively, MDCK cells may be engineered to propagate an MRE-containing virus by (i) stable knockdown of the corresponding miRNA through lentiviral integration (Gentner et al., Nature Methods (2009) 63-66) or (ii) expression of a zinc-finger nuclease specific for Dicer or Drosha (Miller et al., Nature Biotechnology (2007); 778-85) or (iii) by incorporating MREs corresponding to miRNAs that are not expressed or are expressed at very low levels in MDCK cells.
Because the miRNAs corresponding to MREs present in the recombinant live attenuated influenza viruses of the present invention are absent from or expressed at very low levels in allantoic membranes of chickens or in cell lines used for vaccine production, but are abundant in mammalian tissues (e.g., lung tissue and other tissues targeted by the influenza virus), these vaccines are selectively attenuated in mammalian cells yet can be propagated to very high titers in chicken allantoic membranes or in a cell line of choice (e.g., Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MCK) cells [ATCC Catalog Nos. CCL-34, CRL-2285, CRL-2286, CRL-2935, or CRL-2936], African green monkey kidney cells (Vero) [ATCC Catalog No. CCL-81, CRL-1586, CRL-1587, or CRL-2783], human PER-C6 cells (Pau et al. Vaccine 19(17-19) 2716, (2001), or chicken fibroblasts DF1 [ATCC Catalog No. CRL-12203]). Thus, MRE-containing influenza virus vaccines of the present invention allow to achieve viral titers of greater than 1×107 plaque forming units per milliliter (pfu/mL) and permit vaccine propagation using standard tissue culture or high-density cell fermentation technology (Meghrou et al, Vaccine 28(2) 309 (2009)).
The present invention also provides novel improved LAIV vaccine compositions comprising an MRE-containing live attenuated influenza virus and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent. The vaccine may be used in a method of prophylaxis of a disease condition caused by the influenza virus by administering to a subject in need thereof a therapeutically effective amount of the vaccine.
Strategies to further enhance influenza vaccine effectiveness include, e.g., the conjoint administration of adjuvants (see above) or immunostimulatory molecules such as cytokines, lymphokines, or chemokines (e.g., interleukins IL-1, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-12, IL-13, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and other colony stimulating factors, macrophage inflammatory factor, Flt3 ligand, B7.1, B7.2, etc.). Salgaller and Lodge, J. Surg. Oncol. 1998, 68: 122; Lyman, Curr. Opin. Hematol., 5: 192, 1998. Adjuvants or immunostimulatory molecules can be delivered systemically or locally (e.g., directly as proteins or by expression from a vector). See Wood and Williams, In: Nicholson, Webster and May (eds.), Textbook of Influenza, Chapter 23, pp. 317-323; Salgaller and Lodge, J. Surg. Oncol. 1998, 68:122.
A therapeutically effective protective dose of the LAIV vaccine of the invention can be administered by various administration routes known in the art. Mucosal administration is particularly preferred for live attenuated vaccines, since influenza infection occurs via the mucosa and the mucosa harbors dendritic cells, which are important targets for immunotherapy. Examples of useful mucosal vaccination strategies include, among others, encapsulating the virus in microcapsules (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,075,109; 5,820,883, 5,853,763) and using an immunopotentiating membranous carrier (PCT Publication No. WO 98/0558). In a specific embodiment, the vaccines of the invention can be administered mucosally in an admixture with, or as a conjugate or chimeric fusion protein with, cholera toxin (CT), such as CT B or a CT A/B chimera (Hajishengallis, J. Immunol., 154: 4322-32, 1995; Jobling and Holmes, Infect Immun., 60: 4915-24, 1992). Mucosal vaccines based on the use of the CT B subunit have been described (Lebens and Holmgren, Dev Biol Stand 82: 215-27, 1994). In another embodiment, an admixture with heat labile enterotoxin (LT) can be prepared for mucosal vaccination. The immunogenicity of inhalation-based administered vaccine can be also enhanced by using red blood cells (rbc) or rbc ghosts (U.S. Pat. No. 5,643,577), or by using blue tongue antigen (U.S. Pat. No. 5,690,938).
Although the above approaches are promising for improved future vaccination strategies, their use in specific situations requires validation and surveillance to ensure vaccine effectiveness.
To assess the potency of the vaccine, the single radial immunodiffusion (SRD) test can be used. Schild et al., Bull. World Health Organ. 1975, 52: 43-50 and 223-31 Mostow et al., J. Clin. Microbiol. 1975, 2: 531. The dose needed for a satisfactory immune response has been standardized and is 15 μg HA/strain/dose for SRD or a minimum of neutralizing activity in.
The present invention is also described and demonstrated by way of the following examples. However, the use of these and other examples anywhere in the specification is illustrative only and in no way limits the scope and meaning of the invention or of any exemplified term. Likewise, the invention is not limited to any particular preferred embodiments described here. Indeed, many modifications and variations of the invention may be apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading this specification, and such variations can be made without departing from the invention in spirit or in scope. The invention is therefore to be limited only by the terms of the appended claims along with the full scope of equivalents to which those claims are entitled.
Animal infections were performed in accordance with NIH standards. 5 week-old Balb/c mice were purchased from Taconic Farms, Inc. (Albany, N.Y.). Mice were put under general anesthetic for approximately 5 min via inhalation of isoflorane, and a 50 μL volume of virus (resuspended in PBS) was placed on the snares of the mice as they regained consciousness. Viruses were titered by standard plaque assay and pathogenic studies were performed on cohorts of 3-5 mice/inoculating dose. Mice were weighed daily and sacrificed if they lost 20% of the original body mass. Vaccination studies using 1×103 plaque forming units (pfu) of MRE-containing H5N1 virus or mock PBS infections were performed intranasally (PBS, n=2; MRE-containing H5N1, n=7). 21 days post infection, mice were re-challenged intranasally with 1×106 PRNTL H5N1 and were monitored daily for signs of morbidity and mortality.
Human lung epithelial cells were infected with PRNTL or MRE-containing H5N1 at an MOI of 0.01 in the presence of TPCK trypsin. 24 hrs post-infection, supernatant was transferred to naive cells and repeated the following day for a total of 10 passages. 10 dpi, RT-PCR was performed on total RNA and NP PCR products were cloned for sequencing purposes. For in vivo studies, 5 week old Balb/c mice were treated with virus as above. 5 dpi, total RNA was harvested, and used to clone NP for sequencing. Depicted sequences represent over 25 individual colonies per cohort.
The red fluorescent protein minigene expressing miR-124 was generated by E. Makeyev. Makeyev et al., Molecular Cell 27(3):435 (2007). For generation of pRFP-miR-93, a 500 bp genomic fragment containing the pri-miR-93 locus was isolated from mouse genomic DNA by PCR amplification with High Fidelity PCR Master Kit (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, Ind.) per the provided protocol, using forward 5′-TAGTGGTCCTCTCTGTGCTACCG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 112) and reverse 5′-ATTGAACAAAAATGGGGACTCCT-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 113) primers. The resulting PCR product was subcloned into pCR® 2.1-TOPO (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif.) according to the manufacturer's suggestions, and subsequently cloned into the pRFP minigene via PmeI-SpeI sites. Firefly luciferase constructs containing miR-124 MREs and control SV40 3′ UTRs were obtained from E. Makeyev. Makeyev et al., Molecular Cell 27(3):435 (2007).
Human embryonic kidney HEK-293 cells, human lung epithelial A549 cells, human astrocytoma U373 cells, and murine fibroblasts were grown in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium (DMEM, Mediatech, Inc., Manassas, Va.), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (JM Bioscience, San Diego, Calif.) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Mediatech), unless otherwise indicated. Dicer−/− murine fibroblasts were a kind gift from A. Tarahkovsy (Rockefeller University, New York City, N.Y.), and were grown in DMEM supplemented with 15% FBS, 1% nonessential amino acids (GIBCO, Invitrogen), and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Jurkat cells were grown in alpha minimal essential medium, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Primary human dendritic cell RNA was provided by A. Fernendez-Sesma (Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York City, N.Y.). Ex vivo infections of fibroblasts were performed in complete media and the absence of trypsin at an MOI of one for wild type fibroblasts and five for Dicer−/− fibroblasts and harvested at the indicated time points.
RT-PCR and immunoblots were performed as recently described. tenOever et al., Science 315(5816):1274 (2007). Actin (Cat. No. 8226; Abcam Inc., Cambridge, Mass.), polyclonal PR8 (from A. Garcia-Sastre, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York City, N.Y.), IRF1 (sc-640; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, Calif.), STAT1 (sc-417, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), and ISG54 (from G. Sen, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio) antibodies were all used at a concentration of 1 μg/μL and incubated overnight at 4° C. Secondary mouse and rabbit antibodies (GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, United Kingdom) were used at a 1:1000 dilution for one hour at room temperature. miRNA RT-PCR primers are presented in Table 1.
Transfections for fluorescence confirmation of pRFP constructs were performed with HEK293s grown in DMEM with 10% FBS, using 4 μg appropriate pRFP vector and Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), according to the provided protocol. Fluorescence was imaged 24 hours post transfection. For subsequent infection with WT influenza A/Puerto Rico/8/34, HEK293s were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) and a mixture containing 100 ng appropriate firefly luciferase 3′ UTR construct, 10 ng constitutive firefly Renilla, and 700 ng appropriate pRFP construct. Cells were infected at an MOI=1 at 6 hours post transfection, and subsequently harvested for the Dual-Luciferase® Reporter Assay (Promega, Madison, Wis.) 18 hours post infection. For co-transfection with either pBluescript SK+ (Stratagene, Agilent Technologies, La Jolla, Calif.) or pDZ-NS1 (all pDZ constructs were from P. Palese, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York City, N.Y.), HEK293s were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) and a mixture containing 50 ng appropriate firefly luciferase 3′ UTR, 10 ng constitutive firefly Renilla, 350 ng appropriate pRFP construct, and 350 ng either pBluescript SK+ (Stratagene) or pDZ-NS1 (vector described below). Cells were harvested 24 hours post transfection for Dual-Luciferase® Reporter Assay (Promega) per the manufacturer's protocol. All firefly luciferase readings were expressed as a ratio to firefly Renilla expression per sample, and subsequently averaged over three replicates.
Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed student's T-test with an n=3-8. p-values<0.05 were considered significant, and error bars reflect +/−standard deviation.
Total RNA was extracted using Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen) per the supplied protocol, and separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) with a 15% denaturing polyacrylamide gel containing 7.5M urea and 1×TBE. Makeyev et al., Molecular Cell 27(3):435 (2007). The RNA was subsequently transferred to Hybond N+ membrane (Amersham, GE Healthcare Life Sciences) in 0.5×TBE at 360 mA for 60 minutes, cross-linked to the membrane by UV irradiation at 200,000 microJoules/cm2, and the membrane was blocked overnight at 65° C. in 6×SSC, 7% SDS. Hybridization probes are presented in Table 2.
Oligonucleotides depicted in Table 2 were radiolabeled using T4 polynucleotide kinase (Invitrogen) and [γ32P]ATP (PerkinElmer, Waltham, Mass.) and purified by Sephadex G-25 columns (GE Healthcare). Probes were added to the blocking solution at approximately 10 million counts per minute and incubated overnight at 42° C. The blots were subsequently washed four times with 3×SSC, 0.1% SDS at 42° C., and imaged overnight by autoradiogram.
Sites within influenza A/Puerto Rico/8/34 nucleocapsid with partial complementarity to miR-93 were identified using Bibiserv's RNAhybrid algorithm (Bielefeld University Bioinformatics Service, Centrum für Biotechnologie—CeBiTec, Bielefeld, Germany). Nearly full complementarity was achieved with 3-5 steps of site-directed mutagenesis using the QuickChange® kit and protocol (Stratagene) on the pPol-I driven NP vector for viral RNA expression.
The PRNTL1/2 site was cloned from the pPol-I vector into the pDZ backbone for expression of protein in vitro. For RdRp driven Luciferase expression, 250 ng of pDZ-NP-PRNTL1/2 or WT pDZ-NP was transfected into HEK293s along with 100 ng firefly luciferase driven by a pPol-I based plasmid, 10 ng constitutive firefly Renilla, and the remaining influenza virus polymerase segments: 62.5 ng PB1, 62.5 ng PA, and 25 ng PB2. Hoffmann et al., Antiviral Research 80(2):124 (2008). Firefly luciferase activity was determined using the Dual-Luciferase® Reporter Assay (Promega) and expressed as a ratio to firefly Renilla expression per sample, with the average calculated over three replicates.
The pPol-I NP mutants described herein were used to rescue live virus. HEK 293 cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) with mutant pPol-I NP constructs along with WT pCAGGS NP and the seven pDZ constructs corresponding to the remaining seven influenza segments as previously described. Park et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103(21):8203 (2006). Cells were harvested 24 hours post transfection and injected into the Chorioallontoic fluid of fertilized chicken eggs. Live virus was isolated 48 hours post injection and quantified both by hemagglutination assay and plaque assay. H5N1 recombinant influenza A viruses were generated in a similar manner, using constructs previously described.
To express miRNAs exogenously, the miRNA hairpin within its genomic context was cloned as an intron of the red fluorescent protein (RFP), thereby allowing it to be processed following its excision and providing a correlation with RFP expression (
Expression of pRFP-miR-93 or pRFP-miR-124 resulted in the appearance of both pre-miRNA products as well as an increase in their mature forms (
Influenza virus is traditionally propagated to high titers in the Chorioallantoic membrane of embryonated chicken eggs. Thus, for the purposes of the present invention, miRNA species were identified that were not expressed in this membrane but were ubiquitous in both murine and human lung tissue. Using in silico screens of publicly available miRNA profiles, as well as published reports of miRNAs expressed in Gallus gallus, miR-93 was identified as a strong candidate (
In order to incorporate miR-93 sites into influenza virus, regions in the viral genome were identified that maintained high conservation between circulating strains. As influenza virus transcripts do not encode sufficient 3′ UTRs and demonstrate packaging defects with the addition of exogenous RNA, the miRNA targets were incorporated directly into the coding region of NP. The coding region of NP was chosen because this segment demonstrated little genetic drift between strains dating from 1918 to present day, making the emergence of escape mutants unlikely (
Sequence scanning for miR-93-like sites was performed using an RNA folding algorithm, which led to the identification of two stretches of RNA that could be transformed into miR-93 target sites without the need for structural substitutions to the overall protein. To ensure efficient and effective targeting, as well as to decrease the possibility of escape mutants, two near-perfect complementary MREs were designed at positions 225 (site one) and 818 (site two) of segment five. Site one replaced the sequence: 5′-ACAAUAGAGAGAAUGGUG CUCUCU-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 12) to 5′-ACACUUGAACGAAUGGUACUUUCU-3 (SEQ ID NO: 13) (herein referred to as 93NP1) or 5′-ACCUUAGAGAGGAUGGUCCUAUCU-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 139) (herein referred to as PRNTL1). Site two replaced the sequence: 5′-UUUCUAGC ACGGUCUGCACUCAUA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 14) to 5′-UUCCUUGCACGGACAGCACU UUUA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 15) (herein referred to as 93NP2) or 5′-UUUCUAGCCAGAA CUGCACUCUUA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 140) (herein referred to as PRNTL2).
The calculated mean free energy (MFE) of sites one and two were −28 and −37.1 kcal/mol, respectively (
Following verification of NP functionality, human embryonic kidney cells were transfected with the various MRE-containing NP segments alongside plasmids encoding the remaining seven influenza viral segments (A/Puerto Rico/8/34) transcribed bidirectionally by RNA polymerase I and II, thereby simultaneously generating viral RNA (vRNA) and mRNA. Quinlivan et al., J. Virol. 79(13):8431 (2005) and Park et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103(21):8203 (2006). Cells were harvested 24 hours post transfection and were injected into 10-day old embryonated chicken eggs. All influenza virus strains (PRNTL, miR-93NP1, miR-93NP2, and miR-93NP1/2) were rescued with equal efficiency, demonstrating no attenuation in ovo, generating titers greater than 1×107 plaque forming units per milliliter (pfu/mL) (
To determine if incorporation of MRE-containing NP segments resulted in miR-93-mediated attenuation, wild-type and Dicer−/− murine fibroblasts were infected with parental A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (PRNTL), A/Puerto Rico/8/34/93NP1 (93NP1), 93NP2, or 93NP1/2 (
To characterize the MRE-containing influenza strains in vivo, mice were infected intranasally with 104 pfu and harvested total lung extract at 5 days post-infection (dpi). RT-PCR analysis of the cardiac lobe demonstrated no discernable difference between the immune response to PRNTL and MRE-containing strains. In response to each individual strain, there was robust upregulation of Interferon Regulatory Factor 7 (IRF7) mRNA and the induction of key antiviral cytokines including Interferon beta (IFNβ) and Interleukin 6 (IL6) (
To determine whether miRNA-mediated attenuation ex vivo could be demonstrated in vivo and used as a successful vaccine, pathogenesis studies were performed in mice. To illustrate the versatility of this potential vaccine strategy, the MRE-containing segment five of A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (H1N1) was used to rescue a chimeric strain containing avian hemagglutinin (H5) and neuraminidase (N1) from A/Vietnam/1203/04 through standard reverse genetics. Park et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103(21):8203 (2006) and Tumpey et al., Science 310(5745):77 (2005).
To elucidate whether our H5N1 MRE-containing viral strain was attenuated in vivo, mice were infected with increasing concentrations of either H5N1 PRNTL or H5N1 93NP1/2. At viral titers of 105, the PRNTL strain of influenza resulted in 3/3 deaths as compared to only a single mortality for the MRE-containing strain (
These data suggest that the in vivo attenuation of MRE-containing influenza virus still permits a low-grade level of replication, thus demanding an adaptive immune response. This implies that MRE-containing influenza virus strains would generate very high levels of neutralizing antibodies and would therefore serve as excellent vaccine candidates. To test this hypothesis, mice were re-challenged 21 days post infection with the parental H5N1 strain at ten times the lethal dose (106 pfu/mouse) and again monitored for survival (
To ascertain whether miR-93 targeted strains would induce a neutralizing and robust immune response, studies in mice were performed with the A/PR/8/34 H1N1 PRNTL and 93NP1/2 recombinants (
To expand on the above findings that segment 5 (encoding NP) can be targeted by the mammalian-specific miR-93, a second species-specific, MRE-targeted influenza A virus strain was designed that exploited a different mammalian specific miRNA and targeted a different influenza A segment. Specifically, using the general template and approach described above, three near-perfect miR-34 target sites were incorporated into the open reading frame of PA (encoded on segment 3). Incorporation of miR-34 target sites were generated by standard site-directed mutatgenesis (as described in Kunkel, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82: 488-492 (1985), U.S. Pat. No. 5,071,743). Primers for site directed mutagenesis included complementary sets of 5-GATTGGAGAAGAcGTtGCcCCAATTGAACAC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 148) and 5′-AGCTTGATGAGATcGGtGAAGACGTTGCC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 149) for site one; 5′-GGAAGGTCTGCAGGACacTgTTAGCAAAGT-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 150) and 5′-GAAAGTTCCATTGGcAAGGTaTGtAGGACACT-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 151) for site two, and 5′-CCTTACACATGCATTGtcaTAGTTGTGGCAG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 152) and 5′-ACTCCTTCCTgACtCATGCAcTGTCATAGTT-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 153) for site three (with the non capitalized bases representing the base changes made at each step to generate miR-34 MREs). As miR-34, like miR-93, is absent in chicken cells (Table 10), rescue of this virus demonstrated no attenuation when propagated in DF1 chicken fibroblasts (
To expand on both the targeting strategy (open reading frame (ORF) versus untranslated region (UTR)) and to ascertain whether MRE-mediated attenuation could be adapted to tissue/cell culture systems for large-scale influenza production, NS1 or NP influenza genes were targeted with tandem repeats of either a scrambled sequence (Scrbl) or an MRE unique to the hematopoietic cells (miR-142 [5′-UGUAGUGUUUCCUACUUUAUGGA-3′SEQ ID NO: 141]; see Landgraf et al., Cell 129:1401 (2007)). To perform this, the 5′ packaging sequence was duplicated on the viral RNA and this genetic information was inserted between the stop codon and the polyA tail sequence (
The present invention is not to be limited in scope by the specific embodiments described herein. Indeed, various modifications of the invention in addition to those described herein will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description. Such modifications are intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.
All patents, applications, publications, test methods, literature, and other materials cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety as if physically present in this specification.
This is a U.S. National Phase application under 35 U.S.C. §371 of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/000709, filed Mar. 8, 2010, and claims the priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/158,233, filed Mar. 6, 2009, both of which are incorporated by reference herein. The International Application published in English on Sep. 10, 2010 as WO 2010/101663A2 under PCT Article 21(2).
This invention was made with government support under award number W911NF-08-1-0413, awarded by the Department of Defense. The government has certain rights in the invention.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2010/000709 | 3/8/2010 | WO | 00 | 2/23/2012 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2010/101663 | 9/10/2010 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20040152112 | Croce et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20050075492 | Chen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20070026403 | Hatzigeorgiou et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070054872 | Reppen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070213293 | McSwiggen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070253978 | Niman | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080045472 | Brahmachari et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080076116 | Pekosz et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080118531 | Hoffmann et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080201801 | Allen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20090203136 | Baltimore et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20100173312 | Slack et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO2009111892 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Kruger et al. Nucleic Acid Research 2006 vol. 34, W451-W454. |
| Barnes, et al., Harnessing Endogenous miRNAs to Control Virus Tissue Tropism as a Strategy for Developing Attenuated Virus Vaccines, Cell Host & Microbe, vol. 4, pp. 239-248, 2008. |
| Brown, et al., Endogenous microRNA regulation suppresses transgene expression in hematopoietic lineages and enables stable gene transfer, Nature Medicine, vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 585-591, 2006. |
| Burnside, et al., Deep Sequencing of Chicken microRNAs, BMC Genomics, vol. 9:185, 2008. |
| Glazov et al., Origin, Evolution, and Biological Role of miRNA Cluster in DLK-DIO3 Genomic Region in Placental Mammals, Mol Biol Evol, vol. 25(5), pp. 939-948, 2008. |
| Hoffmann, et al., Modulation of influenza virus replication by alteration of sodium ion transport and protein kinase C activity, Antiviral Research, vol. 80, pp. 124-134, 2008. |
| Hsu et al., ViTa—Virus mRNA Target, XP002683988, Retrieved from the Internet URL: http://vita.mbc.nctu.edu.tw/search—target.php?hh=0&mirna=hsa-mir-16&mfe=-12&score=120&target=influenza+A&choice=score&B4= [retrieved on Sep. 24, 2012]. |
| Hsu et al., ViTa: prediction of host microRNAs targets on viruses, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 35, Database issue, pp. D381-D385, 2007. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US10/00709, dated Sep. 6, 2011. |
| International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US10/00709, dated Aug. 30, 2010. |
| Kelly, et al., Engineering microRNA responsiveness to decrease virus pathogenicity, Nature Medicine, vol. 14, No. 11, pp. 1278-1283, 2008. |
| Landgraf, et al., A Mammalian microRNA Expression Atlas Based on Small RNA Library Sequencing, Cell, vol. 129, pp. 1401-1414, 2007. |
| Makeyev, et al., The MicroRNA miR-124 Promotes Neuronal Differentiation by Triggering Brain-Specific Alternative Pre-mRNA Splicing, Molecular Cell , vol. 27, pp. 435-448, 2007. |
| Muramoto, et al., Hierarchy among Viral RNA (vRNA) Segments in Their Role in vRNA Incorporation into Influenza A Virions, J. Virol., vol. 80, No. 5, pp. 2318-2325, 2006. |
| Park, et al., Engineered viral vaccine constructs with dual specificity: Avian influenza and Newcastle disease, Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A., vol. 103 , No. 21, pp. 8203-8208, 2006. |
| Perez, et al., Influenza A virus-generated small RNAs regulate the switch from transcription to replication, Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A., vol. 107, No. 25, pp. 11525-11530, 2010. |
| Perez, et al., MicroRNA-mediated species-specific attenuation of influenza A virus, Nature Biotechnology, vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 572-578, 2009. |
| Pleschka, et al., A plasmid-based reverse genetics system for influenza A virus, J. Virol., vol. 70 No. 6, pp. 4188-4192, 1996. |
| Quinlivan, et al., Attenuation of Equine Influenza Viruses through Truncations of the NS1 Protein, J. Virol., vol. 79, No. 13, pp. 8431-8439, 2005. |
| Shapiro, et al., Noncanonical cytoplasmic processing of viral microRNAs, RNA, vol. 16, pp. 2068-2074, 2010. |
| Sivasubramanian et al., Sequence analysis of the polymerase 1 gene and the secondary structure prediction of polymerase 1 protein of human influenza virus A/WSN/33, J. Virol., vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 321-329, 1982. |
| Song et al., Cellular MicroRNAs Inhibit Replication of the H1N1 Influenza A Virus in Infected Cells, J. Virol., vol. 84, No. 17, pp. 8849-8860, 2010. |
| Subbarao et al., Characterization of an Avian Influenza A (H5N1) Virus Isolated from a Child with a Fatal Respiratory Illness, Science, vol. 279, No. 5349, pp. 393-396, 1998. |
| Supplementary European Search Report and Communication pursuant to Rules 70(2) and 70a(2) for European Patent Application No. 10749069, dated Oct. 15, 2012. |
| tenOever et al., Multiple Functions of the IKK-Related Kinase IKKξin Interferon-Mediated Antiviral Immunity, Science, vol. 315, pp. 1274-1278, 2007. |
| Treanor, et al., Safety and Immunogenicity of an Inactivated Subvirion Influenza A (H5N1) Vaccine, N Engl J Med, vol. 354, No. 13, pp. 1343-1351, 2006. |
| Tumpey et al., Characterization of the Reconstructed 1918 Spanish Influenza Pandemic Virus, Science, vol. 310, pp. 77-80, 2005. |
| Varble, et al., Engineered RNA viral synthesis of microRNAs, Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A., vol. 107, No. 25, pp. 11519-11524, 2010. |
| Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-552950, mailed Jul. 29, 2014, 13 pages (with English translation). |
| ‘Vita’ [online], “Virus-targeted by miRNAs:hsa-miR-16,” [retrieved from the internet on Jul. 29, 2014],Retrieved from the Internet: http://vita.mbcnctu.edu.tw/search—target.php?hh=0&mirna=hsa-mir-16&mfe=-12&score=120&target=influenza+A&choice=score&B4=, 4 pages. |
| ‘Vita’ [online], “Virus-targeted by miRNAs-hsa-miR-93,” [retrieved from the Internet on Jul. 29, 2014]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://vita.mbc.nctu.edu.tw/search—target.php?hh=0&mirna=hsa-mir-93&mfe=-12&score=120&target=influenza+A&choice=score&B4=, 4 pages. |
| GenBank Accession No. J02178.1, dated Jun. 2006, 2 pages. |
| Guan et al., “H5N1 influenza: a protean pandemic threat,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 25, 2004;101(21):8156-61. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120148622 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61158233 | Mar 2009 | US |
