I. Field
The present disclosure relates generally to electronics circuits, and more specifically to techniques for generating local oscillator (LO) signals in a wireless communication device.
II. Background
A wireless communication device such as a cellular phone typically includes a transmitter and a receiver to support bidirectional communication. The transmitter may upconvert output baseband signals with transmit LO signals to obtain an output radio frequency (RF) signal that is more suitable for transmission via a wireless channel. The receiver may receive an input RF signal via the wireless channel and may downconvert the input RF signal with receive LO signals to obtain input baseband signals.
The receiver may include an inphase (I) mixer and a quadrature (Q) mixer to quadrature downconvert the input RF signal. An ideal mixer simply translates an input signal from one frequency to another frequency without distorting the input signal. A practical mixer, however, has non-linear characteristics that can result in generation of various intermodulation components. One such intermodulation component is second order intermodulation (IM2) distortion that is generated by second-order non-linearity of the mixer. IM2 distortion is problematic for a downconversion mixer because the magnitude of the IM2 distortion may be large and the IM2 distortion may fall on top of a desired signal, which may degrade the performance of the receiver.
For second-order non-linearity, the IM2 distortion level increases four folds when an input jammer level doubles. Jammers are large amplitude undesired signals. Second-order intercept point (IP2) is a theoretical point where the IM2 distortion level becomes equal to the desired signal level as the input jammer level is raised. A higher IP2 means lower IM2 distortion for a given input jammer level.
IP2 calibration may be performed for the I and Q mixers in the receiver in order to reduce the amount of IM2 distortion. For IP2 calibration, bias voltages for the I and Q mixers may be varied until either the maximum IP2 or a sufficiently high IP2 is obtained. IP2 calibration is a time consuming process that adds to overall production cost. A receiver with good performance that can avoid IP2 calibration or reduce the complexity of IP2 calibration is thus desirable.
Techniques for generating LO signals to achieve good performance and to either avoid or simplify IP2 calibration are described herein. An LO signal generator may receive a differential input oscillator signal, e.g., from a voltage controlled oscillator (VCO), and may generate I and Q LO signals for I and Q mixers, respectively. The differential input oscillator signal may have timing/phase skew, which may be a major contributor to IP2 degradation.
In an aspect, the differential input oscillator signal may be deskewed or pre-distorted to correct for the timing skew. In one design, an apparatus may include a deskew circuit and a divider circuit. The deskew circuit may receive the differential input oscillator signal having timing skew and may provide a differential output oscillator signal having reduced timing skew. The differential input oscillator signal may comprise first and second input oscillator signals, and the differential output oscillator signal may comprise first and second output oscillator signals. In one design, the deskew circuit may include a first variable delay circuit that receives the first input oscillator signal and provides the first output oscillator signal having an adjustable delay. The first variable delay circuit may include a buffer and a bias circuit. The buffer may receive the first input oscillator signal and provide the first output oscillator signal. The bias circuit may provide a variable bias current for the buffer to adjust the delay of the buffer. The deskew circuit may further include a second variable delay circuit that receives the second input oscillator signal and provides the second output oscillator signal having an adjustable delay. The divider circuit may divide the differential output oscillator signal in frequency and provide a differential I divided signal and a differential Q divided signal, which may be used to generate LO signals.
In another aspect, calibration data for IP2 calibration, deskewing, etc., may be stored in electronics fuses (e-fuses) on an integrated circuit (IC). The ability to store calibration data in e-fuses may allow calibration to be performed as part of product test at the chip level during manufacturing. In one design, an integrated circuit may include an active circuit, a calibration circuit, and at least one e-fuse. The active circuit may receive at least one bias voltage or current provided to adjust the operation of the active circuit. The calibration circuit may receive calibration data and may generate the at least one bias voltage or current in accordance with the calibration data. The e-fuse(s) may store the calibration data. In one design, the active circuit may comprise a downconversion mixer, the calibration circuit may comprise a bias circuit, and the calibration data may be determined based on IP2 performance of the mixer. In another design, the active circuit may comprise a deskew circuit, the calibration circuit may comprise a bias circuit, and the calibration data may be determined based on timing skew of a differential input oscillator signal.
Various aspects and features of the disclosure are described in further detail below.
The techniques described herein may be used for various electronics devices such as wireless communication devices, cellular phones, personal digital assistants (PDAs), handheld devices, wireless modems, laptop computers, cordless phones, Bluetooth devices, broadcast receivers, etc. For clarity, certain aspects of the techniques are described below for a wireless communication device, which may be a cellular phone or some other device.
A receiver may be implemented with a super-heterodyne architecture or a direct-conversion architecture. In the super-heterodyne architecture, an input RF signal is downconverted from RF to baseband in multiple stages, e.g., from RF to intermediate frequency (IF) in one stage, and then from IF to baseband in another stage. In the direct-conversion architecture, which is also referred to as a zero-IF architecture, an input RF signal is downconverted from RF directly to baseband in one stage. The super-heterodyne and direct-conversion architectures may use different circuit blocks and/or have different requirements. The techniques described herein may be used for both the super-heterodyne and direct-conversion architectures. In the design shown in
In the receive path, an antenna 110 may receive signals from base stations, satellites, and/or other transmitter stations and may provide a received RF signal to an RF front-end unit 112. Unit 112 may include one or more switches, filters, duplexers, diplexers, baluns, etc. A filter may pass signal components in a designated frequency range and attenuate undesired components outside of this frequency range. A diplexer may route a received RF signal at a first frequency from antenna 110 to receiver 120 and may route an output RF signal at a second frequency from transmitter 118 to antenna 110. A duplexer may alternately couple antenna 110 to transmitter 118 and receiver 120 on the same frequency. A balun may provide single-ended to differential conversion, impedance transformation, filtering, etc. In the design shown in
Within receiver 120, a low noise amplifier (LNA) 130 may amplify the differential input RF signal and provide a differential amplified RF signal to an I mixer 140a and a Q mixer 140a. Mixer 140a may downconvert the differential amplified RF signal with an I LO signal composed of IP and IM signals from an LO signal generator 160 and may provide a differential I downconverted signal. The differential I downconverted signal may be amplified by an amplifier (AMP) 142a and further filtered by a lowpass filter 144a to obtain a differential I input baseband signal (Ibb), which may be provided to a data processor 170. Similarly, mixer 140b may downconvert the differential amplified RF signal with a Q LO signal composed of QP and QM signals from LO generator 160 and may provide a differential Q downconverted signal. The differential Q downconverted signal may be amplified by an amplifier 142b and further filtered by a lowpass filter 144b to obtain a differential Q input baseband signal (Qbb), which may be provided to data processor 170.
Bias circuits 146a and 146b may be used for IP2 calibration of mixers 140a and 140b, respectively. Electronics fuses (e-fuses) 148a and 148b may store calibration data for mixers 140a and 140b, respectively.
LO signal generator 160 may receive a differential input VCO signal composed of VINP and VINM signals from a VCO 150. LO signal generator 160 may generate the I LO signal for mixer 140a and the Q LO signal for mixer 140b. A phase locked loop (PLL) 152 may receive a frequency control indicating a desired frequency. PLL 152 may generate a control voltage for VCO 150 to obtain the desired frequency for the differential input VCO signal. The VINP and VINM signals from VCO 150 may have timing skew. LO signal generator 160 may correct for the timing skew in order to obtain good performance for mixers 140a and 140b, as described below. E-fuses 162 may store skew correction data for LO signal generator 160.
Data processor 170 may include various processing units for data transmission and reception as well as other functions. For example, data processor 170 may include one or more analog-to-digital converters (ADCs), digital-to-analog converters (DACs), digital signal processor (DSPs), reduced instruction set computer (RISC) processors, central processing units (CPUs), etc. A controller/processor 180 may control the operation at wireless device 100. Memory 182 may store program codes and data for wireless device 100. Data processor 170, controller/processor 180, and/or memory 182 may be implemented on one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs) and/or other ICs.
Within 25% duty cycle LO circuit 230, an AND gate 332 receives the IDIVP and QDIVM signals and provides the I25P signal. An AND gate 334 receives the IDIVM and QDIVP signals and provides the I25M signal. An AND gate 336 receives the IDIVP and QDIVP signals and provides the Q25P signal. An AND gate 338 receives the IDIVM and QDIVM signals and provides the Q25M signal.
In the design shown in
The bottom half of
As shown in
In an aspect, the differential input VCO signal may be deskewed or pre-distorted to correct for timing skew. For deskewing, the timing or phase of the VINP signal and/or the timing or phase of the VINM signal may be varied such that any inherent skew can be offset, and the phase difference can be brought back to approximately 180°. Deskewing may be achieved in various manners with various circuits.
Within variable delay circuit 710a for the VINP signal, buffer 720a includes inverters 722a and 724a coupled in series, with inverter 722a receiving the VINP signal and inverter 724a providing the VOUTP signal. Bias circuit 730a includes P-channel metal oxide semiconductor (PMOS) devices 732a and 734a having their sources coupled to a power supply voltage VDD, their gates receiving a VTUNEP control voltage, and their drains coupled to inverters 722a and 724a, respectively. A DAC 740a may generate the VTUNEP voltage (as shown in
Within variable delay circuit 710b for the VINM signal, buffer 720b includes inverters 722b and 724b coupled in series, with inverter 722b receiving the VINM signal and inverter 724b providing the VOUTM signal. Bias circuit 730b includes PMOS devices 732b and 734b having their sources coupled to the VDD voltage, their gates receiving a VTUNEM control voltage, and their drains coupled to inverters 722b and 724b, respectively. A DAC 740b may generate the VTUNEM voltage (as shown in
The deskewing or pre-distortion of the input VCO signal may be performed as follows. If the VTUNEP voltage is lowered, then PMOS devices 732a and 734a are turned on harder, and more bias current is provided to inverters 722a and 724a. This would result in faster slew rate and less delay through inverters 722a and 724a. The VOUTP signal would then observe less delay and would be shifted left relative to the VOUTM signal. The converse is true if the VTUNEP voltage is raised.
Similarly, if the VTUNEM voltage is lowered, then PMOS devices 732b and 734b are turned on harder, and more bias current is provided to inverters 722b and 724b. This would result in faster slew rate and less delay through inverters 722b and 724b. The VOUTM signal would then observe less delay and would be shifted left relative to the VOUTP signal. The converse is true if the VTUNEM voltage is raised.
A plot 750 shows the VOUTP signal with a low VTUNEP voltage, and a plot 752 shows the VOUTP signal with a high VTUNEP voltage. A plot 754 shows the VOUTM signal with a low VTUNEM voltage, and a plot 756 shows the VOUTM signal with a high VTUNEM voltage. Depending on the amount of timing skew and the direction of the skew, the VTUNEP and/or VTUNEM voltage may be varied to obtain 180° phase difference between the VOUTP and VOUTM signals.
In the design shown in
Deskewing of the differential input VCO signal may be performed in various manners and may be dependent on the design of input deskew circuit 210. In one design, deskewing may be performed as follows for input deskew circuit 210 shown in
IP2 calibration may be performed with or without VCO deskewing in order to obtain good or better IP2 performance. For IP2 calibration, bias circuits 146a and 146b in
The contour plots for the I and Q channels are typically not known for the I and Q mixers on a given IC. IP2 calibration may thus be a 2-dimensional process in which IP2 may be measured for different combinations of I and Q bias voltages to determine the highest IP2 for both the I and Q channels. This 2-dimensional IP2 calibration process may be time consuming and may increase production time and cost.
VCO skew is a main contributor to IP2 degradation, especially in an LO architecture that uses a single-ended dynamic divider such as the one shown in
As shown in
In another aspect, calibration data for IP2 calibration, VCO deskewing, RSB calibration, and/or other calibration on wireless device 100 may be stored in e-fuses on an IC. The ability to store calibration data in e-fuses may allow calibration to be performed as part of product test at the chip level during manufacturing. This may then eliminate the need for an OEM to perform calibration at the wireless device level, which may reduce test time and cost for the OEM.
In one design of IP2 calibration, an I DAC may generate the I bias voltage based on an Ictrl digital control, and a Q DAC may generate the Q bias voltage based on a Qctrl digital control. IP2 calibration may be performed (e.g., as described above for the 2-dimensional process) to vary the I and Q bias voltages with the DACs to obtain good IP2 performance for both the I and Q channels. Calibration data comprising the I and Q DAC values that provide good IP2 performance may be stored in e-fuses 148a and 148b, respectively, in
In one design of VCO deskewing, DAC 740a in
In general, any calibration data for any calibration may be stored in e-fuses. The calibration data may comprise one or more codes or values (e.g., one or more DAC values), depending on the type of calibration being performed.
In one aspect, an apparatus may include a deskew circuit and a divider circuit, e.g., as shown in
In one design, the deskew circuit may include a first variable delay circuit that receives the first input oscillator signal and provides the first output oscillator signal having an adjustable delay. The first variable delay circuit may include a first buffer and a first bias circuit, e.g., as shown in
The first bias circuit may generate the first variable bias current based on a first control voltage, e.g., the VTUNEP voltage in
In one design, the divider circuit may include first and second pairs of inverters and a pair of switches, e.g., as shown in
The apparatus may further include an LO circuit that receives the differential I and Q divided signals and provides first, second, third and fourth LO signals (e.g., the I25P, I25M, Q25P and Q25M signals) having 25% duty cycle and being 90 degrees out of phase. The apparatus may further include first and second mixers. The first mixer may downconvert an input RF signal with an I LO signal and provide an I downconverted signal. The second mixer may downconvert the input RF signal with a Q LO signal and provide a Q downconverted signal. The I and Q LO signals may be generated based on the differential I and Q divided signals, e.g., as shown in
In another aspect, an integrated circuit may include an active circuit, a calibration circuit, and at least one e-fuse. The active circuit may receive at least one bias voltage or current provided to adjust the operation of the active circuit. The calibration circuit may receive calibration data and generate the at least one bias voltage or current in accordance with the calibration data. The at least one e-fuse may store the calibration data. The calibration circuit may comprise at least one DAC that receives the calibration data and provides at least one analog signal used to generate the at least one bias voltage or current for the active circuit.
In one design, the active circuit may comprise a downconversion mixer, the calibration circuit may comprise a bias circuit, and the calibration data may be determined based on IP2 performance of the mixer. In another design, the active circuit may comprise a deskew circuit, the calibration circuit may comprise a bias circuit, and the calibration data may be determined based on timing skew of a differential input oscillator signal.
The differential input oscillator signal may comprise first and second input oscillator signals, and the differential output oscillator signal may comprise first and second output oscillator signals. In one design of block 1014, the first output oscillator signal may be generated with an adjustable delay based on the first input oscillator signal. This may be achieved by (i) buffering the first input oscillator signal with a first buffer to obtain the first output oscillator signal and (ii) adjusting the delay of the first buffer with a first variable bias current or voltage. In one design, the second output oscillator signal may be generated with an adjustable delay based on the second input oscillator signal. This may be achieved by (i) buffering the second input oscillator signal with a second buffer to obtain the second output oscillator signal and (ii) adjusting delay of the second buffer with a second variable bias current or voltage.
The techniques and circuits described herein may be implemented on an IC, an analog IC, an RFIC, a mixed-signal IC, an ASIC, a printed circuit board (PCB), an electronics device, etc. The circuits may be fabricated with various IC process technologies such as complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS), NMOS, PMOS, bipolar junction transistor (BJT), bipolar-CMOS (BiCMOS), silicon germanium (SiGe), gallium arsenide (GaAs), etc.
An apparatus implementing the techniques or circuits described herein may be a stand-alone device or may be part of a larger device. A device may be (i) a stand-alone IC, (ii) a set of one or more ICs that may include memory ICs for storing data and/or instructions, (iii) an RFIC such as an RF receiver (RFR) or an RF transmitter/receiver (RTR), (iv) an ASIC such as a mobile station modem (MSM), (v) a module that may be embedded within other devices, (vi) a receiver, cellular phone, wireless device, handset, or mobile unit, (vii) etc.
In one or more exemplary designs, the functions described may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, or any combination thereof. If implemented in software, the functions may be stored on or transmitted over as one or more instructions or code on a computer-readable medium. Computer-readable media includes both computer storage media and communication media including any medium that facilitates transfer of a computer program from one place to another. A storage media may be any available media that can be accessed by a computer. By way of example, and not limitation, such computer-readable media can comprise RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium that can be used to carry or store desired program code in the form of instructions or data structures and that can be accessed by a computer. Also, any connection is properly termed a computer-readable medium. For example, if the software is transmitted from a website, server, or other remote source using a coaxial cable, fiber optic cable, twisted pair, digital subscriber line (DSL), or wireless technologies such as infrared, radio, and microwave, then the coaxial cable, fiber optic cable, twisted pair, DSL, or wireless technologies such as infrared, radio, and microwave are included in the definition of medium. Disk and disc, as used herein, includes compact disc (CD), laser disc, optical disc, digital versatile disc (DVD), floppy disk and blu-ray disc where disks usually reproduce data magnetically, while discs reproduce data optically with lasers. Combinations of the above should also be included within the scope of computer-readable media.
The previous description of the disclosure is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the disclosure. Various modifications to the disclosure will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other variations without departing from the scope of the disclosure. Thus, the disclosure is not intended to be limited to the examples and designs described herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4061882 | Dorren | Dec 1977 | A |
4333020 | Maeder | Jun 1982 | A |
4555777 | Poteet | Nov 1985 | A |
4623801 | Rocchi | Nov 1986 | A |
4716320 | McAdams | Dec 1987 | A |
4959557 | Miller | Sep 1990 | A |
4995589 | Adishian et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5097157 | Jaffe et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5103114 | Fitch | Apr 1992 | A |
5103116 | Sivilotti et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5103144 | Dunham | Apr 1992 | A |
5192875 | Kielmeyer, Jr. | Mar 1993 | A |
5375258 | Gillig | Dec 1994 | A |
5477180 | Chen | Dec 1995 | A |
5534803 | Correale, Jr. et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5682109 | Ohmi et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5708399 | Fujii et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5983082 | Hilbert | Nov 1999 | A |
5994935 | Ueda et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6014047 | Dreps et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6037816 | Yamauchi | Mar 2000 | A |
6057823 | Aoki et al. | May 2000 | A |
6166571 | Wang | Dec 2000 | A |
6169434 | Portmann | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188291 | Gopinathan et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191629 | Bisanti et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6239640 | Liao et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6310501 | Yamashita | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6316987 | Dally et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320418 | Fujii et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320438 | Arcus | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6420921 | Okayasu et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426660 | Ho et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6433589 | Lee | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6542015 | Zhou et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6593789 | Atallah et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6661269 | Simon et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6667703 | Reuveni et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674772 | Dally et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6831497 | Koh et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836240 | Dubbert et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6897696 | Chang | May 2005 | B2 |
6904538 | Glas et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6933759 | Wu et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6967514 | Kizer et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7075377 | Metaxakis | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7099643 | Lin | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7110469 | Shi et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7184512 | Takeshita et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7239209 | Adan | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7271622 | Metaxakis | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7298222 | Rosik et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7307461 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7315220 | Robinson et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7323944 | Florescu et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7336114 | Razavi et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7352229 | Mei et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7388416 | Marutani | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7423468 | Cho | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7457605 | Thompson et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7474715 | Ni et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7521976 | Sudjian et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7554380 | Embabi et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7580483 | Ibrahim et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7603094 | Rahman et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7616938 | Behzad et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7619456 | Kim et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7656205 | Chen et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7683682 | Won et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7693230 | Sorrells et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7715836 | Vassiliou et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7750708 | Gschier | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7750749 | Jones | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7768330 | Yuuki et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7808329 | Azadet et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7821315 | Bossu et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7932844 | Huynh et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7965111 | Sun et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8095103 | Asuri | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8164361 | Soltanian et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8248132 | Chang | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20010050583 | Fulkerson | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020000834 | Ooishi | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020079938 | Saeki | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020113270 | Bernstein et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020160740 | Hatcher et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030042957 | Tamura | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030102926 | Hsieh | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040008092 | Hajimiri et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040036541 | Fang et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040051397 | Juntunen et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040147238 | Wang et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040212741 | Hijikata et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050024097 | Sim et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050122149 | Cho et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050174157 | Calo et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060035617 | Kim | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060059376 | Ngo et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060067424 | Wolf | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060119446 | Li et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070037544 | Heikkinen | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070076832 | Matsudera | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070239319 | Inukai et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070242548 | Tonti et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070273485 | Balachandran et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070285120 | Venditti et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080001645 | Kuroki | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080032646 | Huang et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080048736 | Ruy | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080061894 | Raita et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080074148 | Srivastava et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080096508 | Luff | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080106313 | Keady et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080116902 | Kim et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080132195 | Maxim et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080180139 | Natonio et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080225169 | Takita et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080231379 | Jang et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080258781 | Song et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090033430 | Jang et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090066157 | Tarng et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090102520 | Lee et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090108885 | Natonio et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090131006 | Wu | May 2009 | A1 |
20090154595 | Choksi et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090156135 | Kamizuma et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090184741 | Suda et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090256596 | Oh | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090284288 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090284311 | Ito | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090310711 | Chiu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100012648 | Gustafsson et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100120390 | Panikkath et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100130139 | Panikkath et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100194485 | Chawla et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100198540 | Yanagisawa et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100226459 | Park et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110001522 | Chan et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110012648 | Qiao et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110043291 | Fagg | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110050296 | Fagg | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110181330 | Oh | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20130012150 | Panikkath et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130271188 | Chan | Oct 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1412947 | Apr 2003 | CN |
0398751 | Nov 1990 | EP |
0637134 | Feb 1995 | EP |
0872956 | Oct 1998 | EP |
1345317 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1394944 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1416691 | May 2004 | EP |
1655591 | May 2006 | EP |
1679796 | Jul 2006 | EP |
2294691 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2670975 | Jun 1992 | FR |
2321144 | Jul 1998 | GB |
53048401 | May 1978 | JP |
59008112 | Jan 1984 | JP |
62141219 | Sep 1987 | JP |
63078610 | Apr 1988 | JP |
H0194723 | Apr 1989 | JP |
2058951 | Feb 1990 | JP |
2060330 | May 1990 | JP |
2131615 | May 1990 | JP |
H03262317 | Nov 1991 | JP |
5268000 | Oct 1993 | JP |
7170162 | Jul 1995 | JP |
9046195 | Feb 1997 | JP |
9191238 | Jul 1997 | JP |
10111674 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10247842 | Sep 1998 | JP |
2000332583 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001245007 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001312328 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2001313228 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002043900 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002064367 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2003101397 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003512752 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003224471 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2004531126 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2004336822 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005110080 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2006093748 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2006115148 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2006173897 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006217563 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2006287819 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2006314029 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2007102483 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2008029008 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2008054134 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2008124836 | May 2008 | JP |
2010003925 | Jan 2010 | JP |
2010539819 | Dec 2010 | JP |
20050055925 | Jun 2005 | KR |
20080019156 | Mar 2008 | KR |
200529566 | Sep 2005 | TW |
200723676 | Jun 2007 | TW |
1283515 | Jul 2007 | TW |
WO9621270 | Jul 1996 | WO |
WO9912259 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO0129965 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO0251091 | Jun 2002 | WO |
02052691 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO2006033203 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO2009036397 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO2009036399 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO2010068504 | Jun 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion—PCT/US2009/064456, International Search Authority—European Patent Office—Aug. 3, 2010. |
Partial International Search Report—PCT/US2009/064456, International Search Authority—European Patent Office—Mar. 8, 2010. |
Roufoogaran R, et al., “A compact and power efficient local oscillator generation and distribution system for complex multi radio systems” Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, 2008. RFIC 2008. IEEE, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Jun. 17, 2008, pp. 277-280, XP031284334 ISBN: 978-1-4244-1808-4 *Section 111. Detailed Description*; p. 277-279. |
Jun. 2008, pp. 277-280, XP031284334 ISBN: 978-1-4244-1808-4 *Section 111. Detailed Description*; pp. 277-279. |
Chan, et al., “Hercules (RTR9800) Divider”, Aug. 2005. |
Chan, “Hercules (RTR8700) Divider”, Aug. 2005. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/011,716, filed Jan. 21, 2011. |
Navid S et al., “Level-Locked Loop: A Technique for Broadband Quadrature Signal Generation”, Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 1997., Proceedings of the IEEE 1997 Santa Clara, CA, USA May 5-8, 1997, New York, NY, USA, IEEE, US, May 5, 1997, pp. 411-414, XP010235334, DOI: 10.1109/CICC.1997.606656 ISBN: 978-0-7803-3669-8. |
Fuse, T et al: “A 1.1V SOI CMOS Frequency Divider Using Body-Inputting SCL Circuit Technology”, 2000 IEEE International SOI Conference Proceedings. Wakefield, MA, Oct. 2-5, 2000; [IEEE International SOI Conference], New York, NY : IEEE, US, Oct. 2, 2000, p. 106/107, XP001003452, ISBN: 978-0-7803-6390-8 p. 106; figure 3. |
Lee, T.H., et al., “A 2.5 V CMOS delay-locked loop for 18 Mbit, 500 megabyte/s DRAM,” Solid-State Circuits, IEEE Journal of , vol. 29, No. 12, pp. 1491-1496, Dec. 1994. |
Taiwan Search Report—TW098138733—TIPO—Jun. 17, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100120390 A1 | May 2010 | US |