This invention relates to an apparatus for transporting, loading, and off-loading munitions with improved efficiency and safety. In preferred embodiments, this invention relates to an apparatus which employs omni-directional wheel modules for optimizing maneuverability thereof.
Heretofore, various munitions handling equipment has been developed for loading and unloading munitions, armaments, and other payloads onto and off of aircraft. Such systems conventionally comprise a trailer-type apparatus that is towable behind a truck or tractor and/or can also be hand-trucked.
In a typical transport and loading operation, a munition is first loaded onto the carrier platform of the apparatus, and then the munitions carrier apparatus is transported to an aircraft (e.g. on an aircraft carrier) either via manpower or by towing with a motorized vehicle. Thereafter, the apparatus is manually positioned so that the munition can be elevated into an aircraft loading position (so that the munition can be mounted to the aircraft).
Although, over the years, prior art munitions handling equipment has been used with varying degrees of success for transporting, loading, and unloading munitions cargo, there are various unresolved drawbacks in the art related to the maneuverability of conventional munitions handling vehicles as well as their mechanisms for disposing of or offloading “hot” munitions. For example, prior art military munitions handling protocols for aircraft carriers necessitate extensive resource waste as well as high costs related to munitions handling. In this regard, employing current military protocols, once a “hot” munition is identified, rather than simply removing the munition from the munitions carrier vehicle, current aircraft carrier guidelines call for disposing the munition and the carrier vehicle by pushing the vehicle overboard e.g. into the ocean.
In this regard, modern Navy aircraft carriers are equipped with disposal ramps via which conventional munitions carrying vehicles and their munitions are disposed of into the ocean. Specifically such ramps have a disposal opening near the perimeter of the deck of the ship having a ramp which extends downwardly and tapers or narrows into a “throat” area having a uniform width. The throat passage, in turn, opens to the surrounding water body.
In order to dispose of a munition, then, the vehicle carrying the unwanted munition is simply pushed to the disposal ramp and down through the disposal opening. As the vehicle dimensions are smaller than the narrowest part of the disposal ramp, the entire munitions vehicle, including its cargo, falls to the ocean surface. As can be seen, therefore, each time a munition is disposed of, the munitions carrying vehicle must be replaced. This results in high use costs, requires that significant vehicle inventory and thus storage space be available, and results in wasted resources and/or unnecessary pollution. However, until now, other mechanisms or methods of disposing munitions have been unsafe or otherwise unsatisfactory.
In addition to the above drawbacks in the art, known munitions vehicles are believed to be inadequately maneuverable for their intended purpose. For example, extremely accurate positioning is required in order to situate a munition in preparation for mounting it to an aircraft. In this regard, conventional vehicles typically employed for loading munitions are of the dual-axle-type and exhibit limited maneuverability in most directions e.g. in order to turn such a vehicle, the vehicle must also be moved either in forward or reverse (or, for some turn types, in both forward and reverse). Because the inefficient maneuverability of conventional munitions vehicles slows munitions loading and unloading and/or requires considerable operator skill, it would be desirable to have a munitions vehicle which is equipped for optimized maneuverability.
As a solution to the foregoing problem, it has been discovered by Applicants that omni-directional wheels are particularly useful when employed on a munitions carrying vehicle. In this regard, during past years, a number of designs of omni-directional vehicles have been innovated. However, most omni-directional vehicle designs are similar in that they use wheels that feature a number of rollers positioned about the periphery of the wheel with the rollers permitting the wheels to support motion in directions at an angle to the wheel's plane of rotation. Omni-directional vehicles using such omni-directional wheels can move in any direction by rotating the wheels and rollers in an appropriate combination. Each omni-directional wheel's rotation is mechanically driven and servo controlled in a coordinated fashion to cause the vehicle to follow a desired path as previously disclosed by Ilon in U.S. Pat. No. 4,598,782. Three, four, or more omni-directional wheels are connected to a suitable chassis, suspension, wheel drives, and controls to form an omni-directional vehicle. Hereinafter, all uses of the words “roller” and “rollers” refer to the type of rollers used on or designed for omni-directional wheels for omni-directional vehicles.
Omni-directional wheels can be grouped into two general classifications. The first class of wheels is comprised of a rigid hub that supports a number of free spinning rollers around its periphery. The hub is rigidly coupled to an axle that, along with other omni-directional wheels and axles, supports the vehicle. The rollers are mounted at an oblique angle to the wheel's axle and are free to rotate about their own axles. Omni-directional wheel roller mounting angles of ninety degrees have been disclosed by Blumrich in U.S. Pat. No. 3,789,947. The omni-directional wheel disclosed by Blumrich was mechanically driven to produce motion parallel to the axis of rotation of the wheel. Omni-directional wheel designs with a ninety-degree roller mounting angle and free-spinning rollers have been disclosed by Bradbury in U.S. Pat. No. 4,223,753; Hiscock in U.S. Pat. No. 4,335,899; Smith in U.S. Pat. No. 4,715,460; and Guile in U.S. Pat. Nos. D318,219 and D318,791. Omni-directional wheels with rollers mounted obliquely at roller mounting angles of approximately forty-five degrees with respect to the wheel shaft have been disclosed by Ilon in U.S. Pat. No. 3,876,255 and Amico in U.S. Pat. No. 5,701,966. U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,876,255 and 5,701,966 are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The second class of omni-directional wheels differ from the above described omni-directional wheel design concepts in that the rotational axes of the free spinning rollers intersect with the wheel's axis of rotation. Wheels of this class have been disclosed by Bradbury in U.S. Pat. No. 4,223,753, and by Pin, et al, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,374,879. In wheels of this class, two or more spherical rollers are mounted in fixed positions so as to constrain the vehicle's motion in the direction of wheel rotation, while being unconstrained in a direction that is orthogonal to the wheel's axis.
In known classes of omni-directional wheels, the axle supporting each roller may be mounted to the omni-directional wheel hub at both ends of the roller, as disclosed by Blumrich, in the center, as disclosed by Ilon and Amico, or at intermediate locations, as disclosed by Smith. Typically, omni-directional wheel rollers are coated with an elastomer surface contact material to improve traction, as disclosed by Blumrich, Ilon and Smith.
Despite the known commercial need for omni-directional vehicles, initial omni-directional technologies did not achieve widespread commercial success due in part to the vibration and uneven ride produced by early omni-directional wheel designs. However, various improvements in omni-directional wheel designs have been made in recent years and are exemplified by the disclosures of U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,340,065 and 6,547,340 owned by Airtrax, Inc. In particular, the improvements in omni-directional wheel technologies that have been made by Airtrax, Inc. have vastly improved their commercial viability. Such commercial usefulness has been principally improved by designing an omni-directional wheel which exhibits constant compliance while rotating under load and which can travel substantially unencumbered over obstacles (e.g. such as a length of chain lying on a ship deck). Moreover, when such a wheel design is employed on a vehicle, the vehicle exhibits substantially constant ride height during directional operation thereby reducing vehicle vibration and allowing higher safe operational speeds. Still other improvements in omni-directional wheels made by Airtrax, Inc. have increased the load carrying capacity of the wheels which is particularly relevant to munitions handling vehicles because munition loads tend to be quite heavy.
For the foregoing reasons, Applicants herein have recognized the benefits of employing omni-directional technologies on munitions handling vehicles, and, in particular, those omni-directional technologies developed in recent years by Airtrax, Inc.
In view of the above-enumerated drawbacks, it is apparent that there exists a need in the art for apparatus and/or methods which solve and/or ameliorate at least one of the above drawbacks. It is a purpose of this invention to fulfill this need in the art, as well as other needs which will become apparent to the skilled artisan once given the following disclosure.
Generally speaking, this invention fulfills the above described needs in the art by providing:
a load carrying vehicle comprising:
a vehicle frame;
wheels operationally connected to the vehicle;
a tray for carrying a cargo load, the tray being carried by a portion of the vehicle, the tray being selectively ejectable from the vehicle thereby to selectively eject cargo loads from the vehicle.
In further embodiments, this invention provides: a method of ejecting a munition from a munitions handling vehicle, the method comprising:
directing the vehicle to a ramp surface, the ramp surface having a initial width at an upper surface thereof, the ramp surface being declined towards a disposal area, and the ramp surface having a decreased width at a constriction thereof at a location located downwardly distant from the upper surface;
operating the vehicle carrying a munition to a location proximal the upper surface of the ramp such that gravity operates to locomote the vehicle downwardly on the ramp surface;
the vehicle having a plurality of wheels, each wheel having an axis of rotation;
the vehicle having a horizontal plane extending between the plurality of wheels' axes of rotation; and
the vehicle having a minimum width in the horizontal plane which is greater than the decreased width at the constriction of the ramp surface; and
wherein when the vehicle is locomoted downwardly on the ramp surface, the constriction obstructs the vehicle from travel beyond the decreased width area; and whereby thereafter the munition is ejected from the vehicle by operation of gravity thereon.
In at least one embodiment of the subject invention it is an object to provide a vehicle including an ejection actuation mechanism comprising a lever for selectively locking and unlocking the tray to the surface of the vehicle.
In an additional embodiment it is an object to provide a vehicle wherein the lever comprises: a lever arm selectively moveable between a first lock position and a second eject position; wherein, in the lock position, the lever arm secures the tray to a portion of the vehicle; and wherein, when the lever arm is actuated to the eject position, a mechanism biases the tray into a roller engaging position such that the tray is movable to eject a load therefrom.
In an additional embodiment, it an object to provide a vehicle wherein the tray is in a roller engaged position, the tray is movable on a surface of the roller such that when the vehicle is oriented at an angle greater than a threshold angle, the tray will eject from the vehicle due to gravitational forces.
In an additional embodiment it is an object to provide a vehicle wherein the vehicle includes a vehicle axis extending between a front and a rear portion of the vehicle; wherein, when the tray ejects from the vehicle, the tray ejects in a direction initially substantially in line with the vehicle axis.
In an additional embodiment, it is an object of the invention to provide a vehicle wherein when the lever arm is moved from the lock position to the eject position, a mechanism advances the tray a distance from the cargo carrying position into a eject position.
In an additional embodiment, it is an object of the invention to provide a vehicle, wherein when the tray is advanced the distance into the eject position, a surface of the tray is engaged to at least one roller such that the tray is movable along a surface via the roller thereby to eject a cargo load from the vehicle.
In yet a further embodiment, it is an object of the invention to provide a vehicle, wherein the vehicle is so designed such that cargo loads are ejected from the vehicle by ejecting the tray from the vehicle.
In still further embodiments, it is an object of the invention to provide a vehicle wherein the tray mount comprises a pair of tray mount rails located on a surface of the vehicle, the tray mount rails including a guide structure capable of guiding the tray as the tray is ejected from the vehicle.
In an even further embodiment, it is an object of the invention to provide a vehicle wherein the vehicle is motorized and the wheels of the vehicle enable omni-directional operation of the vehicle.
In an additional embodiment it is an object of the invention to provide a vehicle which further comprises:
at least one mount roller rotatably connected to the tray mount, the mount roller being so located on the tray mount such that the mount roller engages the tray when the lever arm is in the eject position; and
at least one tray roller rotatably connected to the tray, the tray roller being so located on the tray such that the tray roller engages the tray mount when the lever arm is in the eject position.
In an additional embodiment it is an object of the invention to provide a vehicle wherein the tray mount includes a mount rolling surface to which say tray roller is selectively engageable; and
wherein the tray includes a tray rolling surface to which the mount roller is selectively engageable.
In an additional embodiment, it is an object of the invention to provide a munitions carrying vehicle wherein the vehicle further includes:
a tray rolling surface located on a downward facing side of the tray;
a mount rolling surface located on an upward facing side of the tray mount; and
the mount roller being located proximal the front of the vehicle; and
wherein when the lever arm is located in the lock position, the mount roller is disengaged with the tray rolling surface and is located substantially forward of the tray, and the tray roller is disengaged from the mount rolling surface and is located substantially rearward of the mount rolling surface.
In still further embodiments, it is an object of the invention to provide a vehicle wherein the controller is connected to the vehicle with an operator boom structure comprising:
a first, a second, and a third arm;
the first arm connected to the vehicle via a first linkage, and the first arm connected between the first linkage and a second linkage;
the second arm connected between the second linkage and a third linkage; and
the third arm connected between the third linkage and the controller;
wherein the operator boom structure is so designed and so connected between the vehicle and the controller such that the operator boom structure enables a selected angular orientation of the controller to be maintained with respect to an angular orientation of the vehicle.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention and advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following description of various illustrative and non-limiting embodiments thereof, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like reference numbers indicate like features.
Referring initially to
In the embodiment which is illustrated, vehicle 1 generally comprises a chassis 3 to which a plurality of omni-directional wheels 5 are assembled for providing directional motion to the vehicle as well as a load carrying platform 9 for carrying munitions (or other load types, for example). In order so that the vehicle can be operated, the vehicle further includes an operator interface 7 for controlling the directional motion of the vehicle (i.e., connected to the vehicle chassis via boom 8). As can be seen in
Although, in preferred embodiments, the wheels employed on vehicle 1 are of an omni-directional type, and in most preferred embodiments, are of a type manufactured by Airtrax, Inc. (under various U.S. patents such as discussed in the BACKGROUND section above), certain embodiments are contemplated in which conventional, non-omni-directional wheels, or, omni-directional wheels which are not manufactured by Airtrax, Inc., are employed.
Referring now to
The locking mechanism shown in
As can be seen most clearly in the example depicted in
Turning now briefly to
Once given the above disclosure, many other features, modifications, and improvements will become apparent to the skilled artisan. Such other features, modifications, and improvements are therefore considered to be part of this invention, the scope of which is to be determined by the following claims:
This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/633,704, similarly titled, filed Dec. 6, 2004, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference. The following additional documents, in their entireties, are hereby additionally incorporated by reference: U.S. Pat. No. 6,394,203, filed Dec. 6, 2001, issued to Donald Barnett Harris, entitled METHOD FOR DESIGNING LOW-VIBRATION OMNI-DIRECTIONAL WHEELS; U.S. Pat. No. 6,340,065, filed Jan. 22, 2002, issued to Donald Barnett Harris, entitled LOW VIBRATION OMNI-DIRECTIONAL WHEEL; U.S. Pat. No. 6,547,340, filed Dec. 6, 2001, issued to Donald Barnett Harris, entitled LOW VIBRATION OMNI-DIRECTION WHEEL; U.S. Pat. No. 6,796,618, filed Oct. 18, 2002, issued to Donald Barnett Harris, entitled METHOD FOR DESIGNING LOW VIBRATION OMNI-DIRECTIONAL WHEELS; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/647,122, filed Aug. 25, 2003, applied for by Nicholas Fenelli et al., entitled RELOCATABLE OPERATOR STATION.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60633704 | Dec 2004 | US |