The present invention relates to telecommunications in general, and, more particularly, to location-based services.
Location-based services are services provided based on the location of objects. The most prevalent location-based service is Enhanced 911 (or E911) services. The Enhanced 911 service provides 911 operators and emergency responders with information such as the identification of the person calling and the location of the caller. All mobile telephones sold in the United States today have this feature.
Location-based services include, for example and without limitation, satellite navigation devices that let a user know the location of the closest hospital or gas station to a user. Location-based services may also alert enterprises, such as gas stations, as to when a potential customer is within a certain distance. The enterprise may then send targeted advertisements to a traveler, such as discounts, etc.
Still other location-based services are targeted to the tracking of objects, such as, for example and without limitation, tracking of packages, tracking a fleet of vehicles, or determining the number of people who are in a given area for allotting government services where they may be most needed.
The problem is how to protect users' privacy as they use location-based services.
Protecting user privacy is done by a user creating a series of rules for access to the user's information. These rules set privacy settings based on, for example and without limitation, the recipient of the user's information, where the user may be located, the time, etc.
In the prior art, the privacy settings are maintained in a location-based privacy system such as the one in
Because of the different privacy settings, location-based privacy system 300 checks the rules for each location object to determine whether or not a given location recipient should receive each location object. Location server 302 checks with rule maker 304 to determine whether or not it should send the location object to location recipient 303.
The present invention provides a method determining the privacy settings for location-based services without some of the disadvantages of the prior art. This is done by establishing a session between the location generator and the location recipient.
The session is created by a validator that is capable of keeping track of the rules for a stream of location objects created by a location generator. The validator determines what information to send to the location recipient without having to determine the rules for each location object and each location recipient every time a new location object is received by the location server.
Map 100 is a rectangular area in which we are interested for the purposes of the illustrative embodiment of the present invention. Map 100 comprises areas 101-1 through 101-6.
Although, in accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, map 100 represents some physical space, it will be clear to one skilled in the art after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention in the space is not a physical space, for example and without limitation, the space is instead a virtual space.
Although, in accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, map 100 represents space in two dimensions (2-D), it will be clear to one skilled in the art after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention in the space is not a two dimensional (2-D) space but instead the space is any number of dimensions, for example and without limitation, three dimensions (3-D), four dimensions (4-D), etc.
Although map 100 is a rectangular area, it will be clear to one skilled in the art after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention in which map 100 is any shape or any size.
Although areas 101-1 through 101-6 are a rectangular areas, it will be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention in which areas 101-1 through 101-6 are any shape or any size.
Although areas 101-1 and 101-4 overlap, it will be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention in which areas 101-1 and 101-4 do not overlap, overlap completely, or overlap with other areas.
Although areas 101-2 and 101-4 overlap, it will be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention in which areas 101-2 and 101-4 do not overlap, overlap completely, or overlap with other areas. It will also be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention
Although
Although
Although object 201-1 is depicted as a person, it will be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention in which object 201-1 can be any object, for example, and without limitation: a person, a sensor, a vehicle, an animal, a telecommunications terminal, a stationary object, etc.
Although path 202-1 is depicted as going through areas 101-4, 101-5, and 101-3 of the map, it will be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention in which path 202-1 can travel through any area of map 100.
Although object 201-1 is depicted as traveling along path 202-1, it will be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention in which object 201-1 can travel along any path and through any area of map 100.
In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, object 201-1 travels along path 202-1 through areas 101-4, 101-5, and 101-3 of map 100. As it travels along this path, the location object 201-1 is noted and tracked. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, the location is noted by satellite trilateralization, such as, for example, and without limitation, global positioning system (GPS). Other techniques for determining location include, for example and without limitation, triangulation of endpoints in cellular or wireless networks, proximal device broadcast, purchasing transactions (such as those by credit card or debit card), vehicle-to-vehicle networks, radio signals, etc. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, the location is then tracked by sending periodic updates through a wireless network, such as, for example and without limitation, a mobile telephone or data network, a packet radio network, a IEEE 802.11 (Wi-Fi) network, etc.
For the purpose of this specification, a “location generator” is defined as any device (hardware and/or software) or event that provides an indication of its location. Examples of location generators include, for example and without limitation, global positioning system (GPS) receiver units, including those in mobile telecommunications terminals, triangulation of endpoints in cellular or wireless networks, purchasing transactions (such as those by credit card or debit card), vehicle-to-vehicle networks, radio signals, etc.
For the purpose of this specification, a “location recipient” is defined as any device (hardware and/or software) or person that receives the location information of a location generator. Examples of location recipients include, for example and without limitation, emergency service providers who use location information to locate people in need, a device used by a parent to track his or her child, providers of a location-based services, etc.
For the purpose of this specification, “location information” is defined as information regarding the location of a location generator. This includes, for example and without limitation, a location object, a subset of the information in a location object, the exact coordinates of a location generator, the name of a place of where a location generator is located, a street address, etc.
Although in accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention,
Although in accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention
Although in accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention,
Although in accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention,
Although in accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention,
Although in accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, validator 401 is inside of location server 302, it will be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention in which validator 401 is located elsewhere, for example and without limitation, between location server 302 and location recipient 303, between location generator 301 and location server 302, etc.
In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, validator 401 is implemented by the means of an event processor.
For the purpose of this specification, an “event processor” is defined as hardware and software that performs event processing, event filtering, and event correlation.
In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, event processing refers to operations performed by an information system, for example and without limitation, operations to receive, distribute, store, modify, generate, or discard events. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, event filtering is a type of event processing in which an event is forwarded or blocked to a recipient based on a property of the event or some other computational context.
In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, event correlation is a type of event processing in which an event is evaluated primarily with respect to other events but also system state or context, in order to produce related events. These related events ideally have the characteristics that there is a reduction in the volume of events and/or the information content of the new events is transformed to a more relevant value.
It will be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention, in which validator 401 is implemented by another means.
Although in accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention,
Although in accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, session 501 is between location generator 301, validator 401, and location recipient 303, it will be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention in which the session may comprise other components, for example and without limitation, rule maker 304.
Although in accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, session 501 comprises one location generator, it will be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention in which the session may comprise any number of location generators.
Although in accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, session 501 comprises one validator, it will be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention in which the session may comprise any number of validators.
Although in accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, session 501 comprises one location recipient, it will be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention in which the session may comprise any number of location recipients.
In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, the tasks outlined in
At task 601, validator 501 receives a first request. Although, in accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, this is received from location recipient 303, it will be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention in which the first request received from another source.
In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, the validator 501 will receive an indicium of the location generator as part of this request. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, an indicium of the location generator is some indication of where the location generator may be located. These are, for example, and without limitation, the name of the object to be located, the X and Y coordinates at which the object is located, a name for the place where the object is located (such as “home,” “work,” “school,” etc.), a store where a purchase may have occurred, or any signal that may tell where the object is located.
At task 602, validator 501 receives a first location object. Although, in accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, the first location object is received from location recipient 303, it will be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention in which the first request received from another source.
At task 603, validator 501 receives a first rule. Although, in accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, the first rule is received from rule maker 304, it will be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention in which the first request received from another source.
At task 604, validator 501 generates a first function. This is further detailed in
At task 605, validator 501 establishes a session between location object and location recipient. This step is further detailed in
At task 606, a session is terminated when the conditions of the function are no longer met. For example and without limitation, if the condition of the function is “Let my spouse know my exact location after 9 p.m. and before 8 a.m.,” and it is 8 a.m. the session between the location generator and the location recipient will be terminated. It will be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention that perform task 606.
It will be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use other implementations of the present invention in which one or more of the steps are omitted or are performed in a different order than the one presented or simultaneously.
At task 701, the rules of location generator are determined. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, this task is performed based on the rules received from rule maker 304. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention the location generator would have general rules relating to the dissemination of location information to other parties. For example and without limitation, a user of location generator 301 may want to prohibit the distribution of location objects to all parties (except for emergency services).
In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, rules include, for example and without limitation, policies and settings that are set by the user, are default settings, or are set by some other party. These rules define the relationship between the components and parties.
At task 702, rules of location recipient are determined. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, this task is performed based on the rules received from rule maker 304. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, the location recipient would have general rules relating to the dissemination of location information to other parties. For example and without limitation, location recipient may be a large organization and only certain members of that group may be allowed access to location objects.
At task 703, the relationship of between location generator and location recipient is determined. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, this task is performed based on the rules received from rule maker 304. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, the location recipient would have general rules relating to the dissemination of location information to other parties based in particular on a relationship between the two parties. Examples of these relationship queries are, for example and without limitation, “Allow my friends know that I am within five miles of them,” or “Let my spouse know my exact location,” etc.
At task 704, the relationship of between location generator and a user of the location recipient is determined. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, this task is performed based on the rules received from rule maker 304. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, the location recipient would have general rules relating to the dissemination of location information to other parties based in particular on a relationship between the location generator and a user of the location recipient. Examples of these queries are, for example and without limitation, “Send my present location to the medical center, but only allow my physician to view my location,” “Allow my supervisor and my assistant to know my location, but do not allow anyone else at my job to see my location,” etc.
At task 705, the rules and relationship between location generator and location recipient as product of time are determined. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, this task is performed based on the rules received from rule maker 304. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, the location recipient would have general rules relating to the dissemination of location information to other parties based in particular on a relationship between the two parties as a product of time. Examples of these relationship queries are, for example and without limitation, “Allow my friends know my location during the weekend,” “Let my spouse know my exact location after 9 p.m. and before 8 a.m.,” “Allow my employer to know my location within 500 meters between the hours of 8:30 am and 5:30 pm.,” etc.
At task 706, rules and relationship between location generator and location recipient as product of location is determined. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, this task is performed based on the rules received from rule maker 304. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, the location recipient would have general rules relating to the dissemination of location information to other parties based in particular on a relationship between the two parties as a product of location. Examples of these relationship queries are, for example and without limitation, “Allow my friends know that I am within five miles of them,” “Let my spouse know my exact location unless I am in Atlantic City,” “Allow my employer to know whether or not I am at a work site,” etc.
At task 707, the function based on determined rules and determined relationships is generated. It will be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure that the generated function is capable of handling operations that are combinations of the above operations, for example and without limitation, “Send my location to the medical center, on Monday between 9 am and 5 pm, when I am in New Jersey, and only allow physician to view this information,” “Allow my spouse to view my location only when I am within 5 miles of my home Monday through Friday, but do not allow other members of my household to view this information,” etc. It will be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention in which task 707 is performed.
In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, the following examples, without limitation, are those in which rules of the present invention are enacted using Extensible Markup Language (XML). It will be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention in which a different language is used.
The following example is one in which some hotels to are permitted access to the user's location when the user is at an airport, regardless of the airport's location.
In the following example “sphere” is to allows user bob@example.net to access the user's location information. This rule keeps valid even if the user's home moves.
It will be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use other implementations of the present invention in which one or more of the steps are omitted or are performed in a different order than the one presented or simultaneously.
Although, in accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention,
At task 801, the function determines whether the location recipient has any permission to access the location object. If it does have permission, the decision process proceeds to task 802. If it does not, it proceeds to task 805.
At task 802, the function determines whether the location recipient has permission to access location object given the current or other location of the location generator. If it does have permission, the decision process proceeds to task 803. If it does not, it proceeds to task 805.
At task 803, the function determines whether the location recipient has permission to access the location object at current or other time. If it does have permission, the decision process proceeds to task 804. If it does not, it proceeds to task 805.
At task 804, the function determine the appropriate resolution that location recipient may access location object. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, different location recipients have different permissions regarding the exactness of the location of the location generator. For example, and without limitation, a location generator may give permissions such as, “Allow my friends know that I am within five miles of them, but do not inform them of my location” “Let my spouse know my exact location,” or “Allow my employer to know that I am in New Jersey, but do not give my employer my exact location,” etc.
At task 805, a session is NOT established. Although in accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, after task 805, the system returns to step 801, it will be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention where the system proceeds to another point, for example and without limitation, the system proceeds to the end point.
At task 806, a session is established. it will be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention that perform task 806.
It will be clear to one skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure how to make and use other implementations of the present invention in which one or more of the steps are omitted or are performed in a different order than the one presented or simultaneously.
It is to be understood that the disclosure teaches just one example of the illustrative embodiment and that many variations of the invention can easily be devised by those skilled in the art after reading this disclosure and that the scope of the present invention is to be determined by the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/138,439, filed Dec. 17, 2008, which is incorporated by reference. This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/484,083, filed Jun. 12, 2009, entitled “Spatial-Temporal Event Correlation For Location-Based Services,” which is incorporated by reference. If there are any contradictions or inconsistencies in language between this application and the cases that have been incorporated by reference that might affect the interpretation of the claims in this case, the claims in this case should be interpreted to be consistent with the language in this case.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5214757 | Mauney et al. | May 1993 | A |
6401102 | Ishii et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6614352 | Pellet et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6775614 | Kim | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6816735 | Rayburn et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6823256 | Burt | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6848542 | Gailey et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6871137 | Scaer et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6912545 | Lundy et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6915211 | Kram et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6944447 | Portman et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947976 | Devitt et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6968179 | De Vries | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7007013 | Davis, II et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7023995 | Olsson | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7024205 | Hose | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7031724 | Ross et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7062279 | Cedervall et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7072665 | Blumberg et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7116985 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7142839 | Pelaez et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7181227 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7190960 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197322 | Rayburn et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7203502 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7224987 | Bhela et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7228140 | Anctil et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7231218 | Diacakis et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7236799 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7263086 | Viikari et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7272393 | Wuthnow et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7305245 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7305365 | Bhela et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7327258 | Fast et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7333820 | Sheha et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7349768 | Bruce et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7355508 | Mian et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7366523 | Viikari et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7412400 | Bhela et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7460149 | Donovan et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
8046004 | Tsuchiya | Oct 2011 | B2 |
20020080968 | Olsson | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020094822 | Anctil et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020126701 | Requena | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020160766 | Portman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020160772 | Gailey et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161587 | Pitts, III et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161627 | Gailey et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161646 | Gailey et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161647 | Gailey et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169784 | Cha et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020176579 | Deshpande et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030036379 | Nikolai et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030080869 | Pellet et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105587 | Kim | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030171939 | Yagesh et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191673 | Cohen | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030202104 | Werner | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030207683 | Lempio et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212536 | Wang et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216949 | Kram et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040019581 | Davis, II et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040087043 | Lee et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040092271 | Viikari et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040120323 | Viikari et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040148438 | Liscano | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040192299 | Wilson et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040192339 | Wilson et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040192350 | Pelaez | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040198397 | Weiss | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203883 | Jollis | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203900 | Cedervall et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203901 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203902 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203903 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203907 | Hiller et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203919 | Ross et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225433 | Burt | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230467 | Gailey et al. | Nov 2004 | A9 |
20040235493 | Ekerborn | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243299 | Scaer et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040243417 | Pitts, III et al. | Dec 2004 | A9 |
20050027590 | Gailey et al. | Feb 2005 | A9 |
20050027591 | Gailey et al. | Feb 2005 | A9 |
20050034075 | Riegelman | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055353 | Marx et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050102180 | Gailey et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050130680 | Northcutt | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135264 | Popoff et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143096 | Boesch | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143097 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050159216 | Chiu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050221812 | Gailey et al. | Oct 2005 | A9 |
20050255861 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050272445 | Zellner | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286421 | Janacek | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289095 | Rauhala et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060126601 | Kim et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142027 | Krishnamurthi et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060189328 | Cedervall et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060217131 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060270391 | Kim et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060270421 | Phillips et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070060171 | Sudit et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070118604 | Requena | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124472 | Requena | May 2007 | A1 |
20070149210 | McKiou et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149212 | Gupta et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070202844 | Wilson et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070205888 | Lee et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220038 | Crago | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070244633 | Phillips et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244750 | Grannan et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070270132 | Poosala | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270161 | Hampel et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270163 | Anupam et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270165 | Poosala | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270166 | Hampel et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080004043 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080046134 | Bruce et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065774 | Keeler | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080080486 | Kim et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080085724 | Cormier et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080114612 | Needham et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080154829 | Dalton | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080227473 | Haney | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080301175 | Applebaum et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090033746 | Brown et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090082038 | McKiou et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090100018 | Roberts | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090100459 | Riedl et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100030806 | Kuhlke et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110138006 | Stewart | Jun 2011 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Le, Danh C., “U.S. Appl. No. 12/211,579 Office Action Jun. 7, 2011”, , Publisher: USPTO, Published in: US. |
Le, Danh C., “U.S. Appl. No. 12/211,579 Restriction/Election Requirement Mar. 15, 2011”, , Publisher: USPTO, Published in: US. |
“Event Stream Processing”, “Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Event—Stream—Processing&pri . . . ”, Jun. 8, 2009, Publisher: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. |
Cuellar et al, “Geopriv Requirements”, “Network Working Group—Informational http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3693.txt”, Feb. 2004, Publisher: The Internet Society. |
Peterson, J., “A Presence-based GEOPRIV Location Object Format”, “Network Working Group—Standards Track http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4119”, Dec. 2005, Publisher: The Internet Society. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100151885 A1 | Jun 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61138439 | Dec 2008 | US |