The disclosure relates to compositions and methods that are effective to lower ejection energies for a micro-fluid ejection device.
Micro-fluid ejection devices have been used in various devices for a number of years. A common use of micro-fluid ejection devices includes inkjet heater chips found in inkjet printheads. Despite their seeming simplicity, construction of micro-fluid ejection devices requires consideration of many interrelated factors for proper functioning.
The current trend for ink jet printing technology (and micro-fluid ejection devices generally) is toward lower jetting energy, greater ejection frequency, and, in the case of printing, higher print speeds. A minimum quantity of thermal energy must be present on a heater surface in order to vaporize a fluid inside a micro-fluid ejection device so that the fluid will vaporize and escape through an opening or nozzle. In the case of an ink jet printhead, the overall energy or “jetting energy” must pass through a plurality of layers before the requisite energy for fluid ejection reaches the heater surface. The greater the thickness of the layers, the more jetting energy will be required before the requisite energy for fluid ejection can be reached on the heating surface. However, a minimum presence of protective layers is necessary to protect the heater resistor from chemical corrosion, from fluid leaks, and from mechanical stress from the effects of cavitation.
One way to increase the printing speed is to include more ejectors on a chip. However, more ejectors and higher ejection frequency create more waste heat, which elevates the chip temperature and results in ink viscosity changes and variation of the chip circuit operation. Eventually, ejection performance and quality will be degraded due to an inability to maintain an optimum temperature for fluid ejection. Hence, there continues to be a need for improved micro-fluid ejection devices having reduced jetting energy for higher frequency operation.
With regard to the foregoing, the disclosure provides an improved micro-fluid ejection head having reduced jetting energy. One skilled in the art understands that jetting energy is proportional to the volume of material that is heated during an ejection sequence. Hence, reducing the heater overcoat thickness will reduce jetting energy. However, as the overcoat thickness is reduced, corrosion of the ejectors becomes more of a factor with regard to ejection performance and quality.
In this disclosure, an improved structure for a heater stack is provided. The heating stack structure includes a semi-conductor substrate on which an insulating layer is deposited. A resistive layer covers the insulating layer. A plurality of heater resistors are formed throughout the resistive layer which is selected from the group consisting of TaAl, Ta2N, TaAl(O,N), TaAlSi, TaSiC, Ti(N,O), Wsi(O,N), TaAlN and TaAl/Ta. A sacrificial layer comprising an oxidizable metal is deposited with a thickness ranging from about 500 to about 5000 Angstroms on the layer of heater resistors. As deposited, the sacrificial layer has conductive properties. An additional metal layer, referred to herein as the “conductive layer,” is deposited on the sacrificial layer so that the additional metal layer or “conductive layer” can be fashioned to form electrodes which provide anode and cathode connections to the plurality of heater resistors. The exposed portion of the sacrificial layer is oxidized such that the exposed portion of the sacrificial layer provides a protective fluid contact layer on the heater resistors. The remaining unreacted portions of the sacrificial layer maintain their conductive properties so that there is minimal resistance between the resistive layer and the electrodes.
In another embodiment, the disclosure provides a method of making a micro-fluid ejection head structure. The method includes the steps of providing a semiconductor substrate, and depositing an insulating layer on the substrate. The insulating layer having a thickness ranging from about 8,000 to about 30,000 Angstroms. A resistive layer is deposited on the insulating layer. The resistive layer has a thickness ranging from about 500 to about 1,500 Angstroms and may be selected from the group consisting of TaAl, Ta2N, TaAl(O,N), TaAlSi, TaSiC, Ti(N,O), Wsi(O,N), TaAlN and TaAl/Ta. A sacrificial layer is deposited on the resistive layer. The sacrificial layer has a thickness ranging from about 500 to about 5,000 Angstroms and may be selected from the group consisting of tantalum (Ta), and titanium (Ti). A plurality of heater resistors is defined in the resistive layer and sacrificial layer. A conductive layer is deposited on the sacrificial layer. The conductive layer is etched to define ground and address electrodes and a heater resistor therebetween. A dielectric layer is deposited on the heater resistor and corresponding electrodes. The dielectric layer has a thickness ranging from about 1,000 to about 8,000 Angstroms and is selected from the group consisting of silicon dioxide, diamond-like carbon (DLC), and doped DLC. The dielectric layer is developed to expose the sacrificial layer to a fluid chamber. Subsequently, the exposed portion of the sacrificial layer is passivated by a chemical process such as oxidization.
One advantage of embodiments of the disclosure can be better heater performance due to the reduced overall overcoat thickness. This reduction in overcoat thickness translates into higher heating efficiency and higher frequency jetting. Another benefit of embodiments of the disclosure can be that process costs will be lower because an entire mask level used in a conventional method of manufacture may be eliminated. Additionally, the method of manufacture is compatible with the current process of manufacture, so that manufacturers using this process do not require additional capital equipment for construction of micro-fluid ejection devices.
Further advantages of embodiments of the disclosure may be apparent by reference to the detailed description of exemplary embodiments when considered in conjunction with the following drawings, in which like reference numbers denote like elements throughout the several views, and wherein:
a is a graphical representation of the relationship between electrical resistance and Ta/Ta2O5 sacrificial layer thickness according to the disclosure;
b is a graphical representation of the relationship between peak current density and Ta/Ta2O5 sacrificial layer thickness according to the disclosure;
a is a graphical representation of the relationship between electrical resistance and Ti/TiO2 sacrificial layer thickness according to the disclosure; and
b is a graphical representation of the relationship between peak current density and Ti/TiO2 sacrificial layer thickness according to the disclosure.
With reference to
A resistive layer 16 is deposited on the insulating layer 14. The resistive layer 16 may be selected from TaAl, Ta2N, TaAl(O,N), TaAlSi, TaSiC, Ti(N,O), WSi(O,N), TaAlN and TaAl/Ta and has a thickness ranging from about 500 to about 1,500 Angstroms.
A conductive layer 18 is deposited on the resistive layer 16 and is etched to provide power and ground conductors 18A and 18B for a heater resistor 20 defined between the power and ground conductors 18A and 18B. The conductive layer 18 may be selected from conductive metals, including but not limited to, gold, aluminum, silver, copper, and the like and has a thickness ranging from about 4,000 to about 15,000 Angstroms.
A passivation layer 22 is deposited on the heater resistor 20 and a portion of conductive layer 18 to protect the heater resistor 20 from fluid corrosion. The passivation layer 22 typically consists of composite layers of silicon nitride (SiN) 22A and silicon carbide (SiC) 22B with SiC being the top layer. The passivation layer 22 has an overall thickness ranging from about 1,000 to about 8,000 Angstroms.
A cavitation layer 26 is then deposited on the passivation layer overlying the heater resistor 20. The cavitation layer 26 has a thickness ranging from about 1,500 to about 8,000 Angstroms and is typically composed of tantalum (Ta). The cavitation layer 26, also referred to as the “fluid contact layer” provides protection of the heater resistor 20 from erosion due to bubble collapse and mechanical shock during fluid ejection cycles.
Overlying the power and ground conductors 18A and 18B is another insulating layer or dielectric layer 28 typically composed of epoxy photoresist materials, polyimide materials, silicon nitride, silicon carbide, silicon dioxide, spun-on-glass (SOG), laminated polymer and the like. The insulating layer 28 provides insulation between a second metal layer 24 and conductive layer 18 and has a thickness ranging from about 5,000 to about 20,000 Angstroms.
One disadvantage of the micro-fluid ejection head structure 10 described above is that the multiplicity of protective layers or heater overcoat layers 30 within the micro-fluid ejection head structure 10 increases the thickness of the heater overcoat layer 30, thereby increasing the overall jetting energy requirement. As set forth above, the heater overcoat layer 30 consists of the composite passivation layer 22 and the cavitation layer 26.
Upon activation of the heater resistor 20, some of the energy ends up as waste heat-energy used to heat the overcoat layer 30 via conduction—while the remainder of the energy is used to heat the fluid on the surface of the cavitation layer 26. When a surface of the heater resistor 20 reaches a fluid superheat limit, a vapor bubble is formed. Once the vapor bubble is formed, the fluid is thermally disconnected from the heater resistor 20. Accordingly, the vapor bubble prevents further thermal energy transfer to the fluid.
It is the thermal energy transferred into the fluid, prior to bubble formation that drives the liquid-vapor change of state of the fluid. Since thermal energy must pass through the overcoat layer 30 before heating the fluid, the overcoat layer 30 is also heated. It takes a finite amount of energy to heat the overcoat layer 30. The amount of energy required to heat the overcoat layer 30 is directly proportional to the thickness of the overcoat layer 30. An illustrative example of the relationship between the overcoat layer thickness and energy requirement for a specific heater resistor 20 size is shown in
Jetting energy is important because it is related to power (power being the product of energy and firing frequency of the heater resistors 20). Substrate temperature rise is related to power. Adequate jetting performance and fluid characteristics, such as print quality in the case of an ink ejection device, are related to the substrate temperature rise.
Because power equals the product of energy and frequency, and the substrate temperature is a function of input power, there is thus a maximum jetting frequency for operation of such micro-fluid ejection devices. Accordingly, one goal of modern ink jet printing technology using the micro-fluid ejection devices described herein can be to maximize the level of jetting frequency while still maintaining the optimum chip temperature required for high print quality. While the optimum substrate temperature varies due to other design factors, it is generally desirable to limit the substrate temperature to about 75° C. to prevent excessive nozzle plate flooding, air devolution, droplet volume variation, premature nucleation, and other detrimental effects.
The disclosed embodiments improve upon the prior art micro-fluid ejection head structures 10 by reducing the number of protective layers in the micro-fluid ejection head structure, thereby reducing a total overcoat layer thickness for a micro-fluid ejection head structure. A reduction in overcoat thickness translates into less waste energy. Since there is less waste energy, jetting energy that was used to penetrate a thicker heater overcoat layer may now be allocated to higher jetting frequency while maintaining the same energy conduction as before to the exposed heater surface.
With reference to
With reference to
Next a sacrificial layer 46 selected from an oxidizable metal is deposited on the resistive layer 44 (
A conductive layer 48 is then deposited on the sacrificial layer 46 (
Next, a dielectric layer 60 is deposited on the electrodes 48A and 48B and sacrificial layer 46. The dielectric layer 60 has a thickness ranging from about 1,000 to about 8,000 Angstroms. The dielectric layer is selected from the group consisting of diamond-like carbon (DLC), doped-DLC, silicon nitride, and silicon dioxide. The dielectric layer 60 is etched to expose fluid in the fluid chamber 38 to the heater resistor 50 as shown in
The heater surface 50, comprising the exposed portion of the sacrificial layer 52, is passivated by a chemical process such as oxidation to provide a passivated portion 62 (
A unique characteristic of the above described embodiment is that the unreacted portions (46A and 46B) of the sacrificial layer 46 continue to behave as conductors even after the oxidation process. Therefore, very little jetting energy is consumed between the resistive layer 44 and the anode 48A or cathode 48B. In other words, less jetting energy is required in order to generate the requisite energy level for fluid ejection to take place than if the unreacted portions 46A and 46B of the sacrificial layer 46 exhibited insulative rather than conductive properties.
With reference to
As will be appreciated, the process for forming the structure of the micro-fluid ejection head structure 32 described above is substantially shorter and less complicated than the process and associated steps in forming micro-fluid ejection device heater stacks found in the prior art (
When compared to the prior art, the process and device disclosed herein will save a manufacturer of micro-fluid ejection devices two deposition steps, two etching steps, and one lithography step. Referring back to
As shown in
Using sacrificial layers 46 less than about 1,000 Angstroms brings forth less obvious but, nonetheless, undesirable results such as asymmetric current density throughout the heater resistor 50 portion. The cause of such asymmetric current density is that the electrons must find a path through the sacrificial layer 46 in the vicinity of the edge of the electrodes 48A and 48B. However, the electrodes, often made of aluminum, exhibit a much lower bulk resistivity than the Ta, Ta2O5, Ti, or TiO2 in the sacrificial layer 46. Using a sacrificial layer 46 of less than about 500 Angstroms results in a substantial increase in peak current density, greater resistance values in the sacrificial layer 46 contribute to asymmetric current density, and asymmetric current density is an undesirable property that yields unacceptable micro-fluid ejection device output results. Accordingly, a minimum exemplary thickness for the sacrificial layer 46 is about 500 Angstroms.
While specific embodiments of the invention have been described with particularity herein, it will be appreciated that the disclosure is susceptible to modifications, additions, and changes by those skilled in the art within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This application is a division of application Ser. No. 10/927,796, filed Aug. 27, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,195,343.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4535343 | Wright et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4694306 | Ikeda et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4777494 | Shibata et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4860033 | Shiozaki et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4931813 | Pan et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4936952 | Komuro | Jun 1990 | A |
4956653 | Braun | Sep 1990 | A |
4990939 | Sekiya et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5066963 | Kimura et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5081473 | Hawkins et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5580468 | Fujikawa et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5636441 | Meyer et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5682188 | Meyer et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5831648 | Mitani et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5844586 | Berry et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5883650 | Figueredo et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5980025 | Burke et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6013160 | Raisanen et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6142612 | Whitman | Nov 2000 | A |
6161924 | Mitani et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6224191 | Saito et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6293654 | Pidwerbecki | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299294 | Regan | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315384 | Ramaswami et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331049 | Leban | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336713 | Regan et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6341848 | Shade et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6467884 | Murooka et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6491377 | Cleland et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6532027 | Ozaki et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6575563 | Cornell | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6598961 | Kuk et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6637866 | Cornell et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6644790 | Ozaki et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6663228 | Saito et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6676246 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6715859 | Pan | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6719406 | Silverbrook et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
7195343 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
20020130927 | Miyakoshi et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020172064 | Chen | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030071877 | Hess | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030151646 | Miyamoto et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030231228 | Cox et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070126773 A1 | Jun 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10927796 | Aug 2004 | US |
Child | 11673795 | US |