The invention relates generally to microelectronic circuits and, more particularly, to interconnect structures for use therein.
Microelectronic devices generally include many on-die interconnects to provide signal delivery and distribution functions for the circuitry. These interconnects are typically used to carry, for example, clock signals, power signals, and/or data signals to various points on the die. In the past, the loss within these on-die interconnects was not a primary concern. Instead, the interconnects were designed to prevent ringing and other signal compromising effects. The loss within on-die interconnects, however, is now becoming a greater concern. For example, one low skew clocking strategy that is currently being considered for use within microelectronic devices is salphasic clocking. Salphasic clocking uses standing waves on a transmission medium to distribute a clock signal in a relatively low skew manner. To generate standing waves that are adequate to support salphasic clocking, however, transmission structures having relatively low loss are typically required. For this and other reasons, there is a need for low loss interconnect structures that can be implemented on-die within a microelectronic device.
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that show, by way of illustration, specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention. It is to be understood that the various embodiments of the invention, although different, are not necessarily mutually exclusive. For example, a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described herein in connection with one embodiment may be implemented within other embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. In addition, it is to be understood that the location or arrangement of individual elements within each disclosed embodiment may be modified without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined only by the appended claims, appropriately interpreted, along with the full range of equivalents to which the claims are entitled. In the drawings, like numerals refer to the same or similar functionality throughout the several views.
The present invention relates to a low loss interconnect structure that can be implemented on-die within a microelectronic device. The interconnect structure can be used to replace many of the various interconnects commonly implemented on-die, particularly those used in resonance applications. In clocking networks, for example, the structure can be used to provide, point-to-point connections, tree structures, and/or various grid hierarchies. Because of its low loss, the interconnect structure is particularly beneficial when used as part of a salphasic clock distribution network within a microelectronic circuit. As is well known, the use of low loss transmission structures in salphasic systems can result in significantly lower clock skews within a system.
Clocking networks and other on-die signal distribution structures have traditionally been characterized as simple resistance-capacitance (RC) networks. One goal when designing such networks, therefore, has been to minimize circuit inductance. One method to minimize inductance is to place conductive signal return structures close to the signal lines to reduce the size of the effective inductive loop. This technique is enhanced by interleaving signal traces with return traces on the same metal layer of the die.
The attenuation coefficient (α) of a transmission line can be represented by the following equation:
α=Re√((R+jωL)(G+jωC))
where R is the series resistance per unit length, L is the series inductance per unit length, G is the shunt conductance per unit length, and C is the shunt capacitance per unit length. In conceiving the present invention, it was appreciated that the loss of a transmission line could be reduced significantly by decreasing R/L without significantly increasing C. In the interconnect structure 20 of
Because the interconnect 20 of
In at least one application, the low loss interconnect structure of the present invention is used within a salphasic clock network. Salphasic clocking uses standing waves on a transmission medium to distribute a clock signal to multiple points within a system with relatively low skew. Standing waves are created on a transmission line whenever a signal propagating on the transmission line encounters an impedance mismatch on the line. To purposely create a standing wave on a transmission line, an open or short circuit is typically used to terminate the line. When the transmission line is lossless, the standing wave will include a plurality of zero magnitude minima along the length of the transmission line that are located at half wavelength (i.e., λ/2) intervals. These minima mark the locations of abrupt 180 phase changes in the corresponding signal. In each region between adjacent minima, the phase of the corresponding signal is constant. Thus, to some extent, the phase of the signal has been made non-position dependent. It is this non-position dependent phase quality of the standing wave that is taken advantage of in salphasic clocking.
As described previously, in the past, on-die interconnects were typically relatively lossy structures. Thus, these structures were not optimal for use in salphasic clocking networks. The interconnect structure of the present invention, however, is capable of achieving losses that are low enough to make on-die salphasic clocking feasible. In at least one embodiment, the effective loss of the low loss interconnect structure is reduced even further by placing active elements at various locations within the structure (e.g., at various points within a grid) to provide signal gain. Negative impedance converter circuits can be used to reduce the skew proportionally to the decrease in loss. The inventive interconnect structure can be implemented in a variety of different salphasic clock distribution schemes, including salphasic tree structures (e.g., H trees and binary trees) and salphasic grid structures.
In the illustrated embodiment, the salphasic clock grid 80 is fed a differential clock signal at four different locations 92, 94, 96, 98 on the grid 80. Buffer units having small signal, differential outputs can be used to drive the grid 80 at these locations. The salphasic clock grid 80 will generate standing waves using the differential clock signal. The resulting standing wave pattern will depend on a number of factors including: the phasing of the four drive signals, the dimensions of the grid 80, and the frequency of the clock signal. The standing wave pattern will have large regions where clock signal phase is position independent. Thus, the loads can be connected to the grid anywhere within these regions to achieve low skew. In at least one embodiment, the signal phase is position independent for the entire grid 80. In a preferred approach, a sinusoidal clock signal is used to simplify phase detection at the load locations, although other clock signal types can alternatively be used. As the reader will appreciate, the inventive interconnect structure can be implemented in a variety of other on-die salphasic clock distribution structures.
Although the present invention has been described in conjunction with certain embodiments, it is to be understood that modifications and variations may be resorted to without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as those skilled in the art readily understand. Such modifications and variations are considered to be within the purview and scope of the invention and the appended claims.
This application is a Divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/893,023 filed Jun. 27, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,909,127, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5387885 | Chi | Feb 1995 | A |
5397943 | West et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5410491 | Minami | Apr 1995 | A |
5497109 | Honda et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5519351 | Matsumoto | May 1996 | A |
5521541 | Okamura | May 1996 | A |
5570045 | Erdal et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5668484 | Nomura | Sep 1997 | A |
5691662 | Soboleski et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5717229 | Zhu | Feb 1998 | A |
5761253 | Fujita et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5969559 | Schwartz | Oct 1999 | A |
6005428 | Amdahl | Dec 1999 | A |
6037822 | Rao et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6043704 | Yoshitake | Mar 2000 | A |
6144224 | Lee et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6150865 | Fluxman et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157688 | Tamura et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6184736 | Wissell et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198307 | Garlepp et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211714 | Jeong | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6239387 | Wissell | May 2001 | B1 |
6255884 | Lewyn | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6311313 | Camporese et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6323714 | Naffziger et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6397375 | Block et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6411151 | Nair et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6420663 | Zelikson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429714 | Schultz | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6532544 | Masleid et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6556089 | Wood | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6570429 | Hellriegel | May 2003 | B1 |
6624719 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6690570 | Hajimiri et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6781236 | Shimooka et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
20020083359 | Dow | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020190775 | Magoshi | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030001652 | O'Mahony et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1376747 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1-289155 | Nov 1989 | JP |
2-158165 | Jun 1990 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050227507 A1 | Oct 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09893023 | Jun 2001 | US |
Child | 11152643 | US |