Solar and/or battery powered parking systems such as single-space or multi-space meters for vehicles can employ parking meters with vehicle detection systems that detect the presence of a vehicle in a parking space. Time paid for parking in the space can then be dependent on the space being occupied by a vehicle. One technique for detecting the presence of a vehicle is to use a magnetometer located in the parking space. A magnetometer can be advantageous because it has relatively low power requirements, and often can be suitably powered by a battery. A magnetometer must be located close to the vehicle that will occupy the parking space, for accurate detection without false indications. Placement of a magnetometer in a parking space typically requires coring of the surface asphalt or concrete (i.e., drilling a cylindrical opening or shaft) for embedding the magnetometer in the adjacent street or sidewalk area. This can be a very labor intensive and relatively expensive proposition.
Alternatively, a magnetometer could be included in a parking meter of the parking space, which would avoid the surface coring and embedding of the magnetometer. This placement will usually decrease the accuracy of detection, because magnetometers possess no directional detection capability. Because of the directional deficiency, a magnetometer installed in a meter potentially could not distinguish between a vehicle parked in the space associated with the parking meter and a vehicle parked in an adjacent parking space, or could not distinguish between a vehicle parked in the space and a vehicle stopped in the street.
Other vehicle detection systems have employed ultrasonic or infrared systems internal to a parking meter. Such systems send out a known ultrasonic or infrared signal and evaluate vehicle presence based on partial reflection of the signal, or lack thereof. The signal can be modulated for improved accuracy of detection. Because parking meters, especially single-space parking meters, usually have a limited power budget, these ultrasonic and infrared systems are designed to be operated at relatively low power levels. Unfortunately, low-power ultrasonic and infrared systems are often prone to signal interference, due to pedestrian traffic, rain, snow, wind, and the like, and can have very narrow angles of detection. Accuracy of detection can be improved by increased signal power. Moreover, ultrasonic and infrared systems typically require a relatively large percentage of the transmitted signal to be reflected back for detecting the presence of a vehicle. Receiving a reflected signal that constitutes a large percentage of the transmitted signal can be problematic, given weather conditions and pedestrian traffic, and therefore ultrasonic and infrared systems can be inherently unreliable as a means for detecting the presence of a vehicle in a parking space.
Other vehicle detection systems that potentially could be more accurate than low-power magnetometers, ultrasonic systems, and infrared systems, include cameras, passive infrared systems (such as used in automatic door openers), active infrared detection, and radar. These other systems, while possibly providing very accurate detection of a vehicle in a parking space, typically use more power than can be provided by a battery, solar cell, or other low-power system of a battery and/or solar powered parking meter such as the single space meter described below. For example, radar can be very difficult to utilize because of power management issues, and often provides relatively unpredictable results.
It should be apparent that accurate vehicle detection systems either require extensive installation and/or maintenance costs, as with embedded magnetometer systems, or are very inaccurate when placed a distance away from the object to be detected, or use too much power for a single-space parking meter in order to be suitable. In addition, a directional sensor that is placed in the space to be monitored or external to a meter pole, may become compromised by dirt or debris, or may fall victim to tampering. What is needed is a more reliable, low power vehicle detection system for use in a solar and/or battery powered parking meter. The present invention satisfies this need.
A parking meter detects an object in proximity, based on a change in a proximity measurement at the meter, activates a directional sensor in response to detecting the object, receives sensor data at a meter processor from the directional sensor, wherein the received sensor data indicates a predetermined direction to the detected object relative to the meter. The parking meter determines a presence of the object, or lack thereof, in the predetermined direction based on the sensor data, and upon a positive determination of the presence of the object, stores an indication of the presence of the object along with a time of the positive determination.
Further areas of applicability of the present disclosure will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating various embodiments, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure.
The invention is now described, by way of a non-limiting example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, where like reference numerals refer to like objects, and in which:
A parking meter for a parking space associated with the parking meter utilizes a proximity sensor to detect an object in proximity to the parking space and in response activates a directional sensor to detect the presence and direction of the object, such as a motor vehicle. The proximity sensor is a low-power sensor that can detect an object in proximity to the sensor, but generally has insufficient sensitivity and precision to identify the presence and direction of the object. For example, a low-power proximity sensor comprising a magnetometer can detect if a metallic object is in proximity to the magnetometer, but is generally incapable of detecting the direction in which the metallic object is located in relation to the magnetometer. The directional sensor typically draws more power than the proximity sensor and can comprise a sensor such as, but not limited to, an infrared, passive infrared, radar, or optical sensor, which is capable of determining the presence of an object in a specific direction relative to the higher-powered directional sensor. Such directional sensors typically require greater power for operation than can be supplied continuously or periodically by a typical power-limited device such as a single space parking meter. In accordance with the disclosure, the low-power proximity sensor can comprise a magnetometer, which is used as a trigger to activate the directional sensor to receive sensor data. The directional sensor data is analyzed to determine whether or not an object detected by the low-power sensor is located in a specific location associated with the directional sensor. This construction permits the use of a relatively higher power directional sensor having greater accuracy, such that the directional sensor can be activated only when needed, as indicated by the low-power sensor. This eliminates the need for providing continuous or periodic power to the higher power directional sensor.
In another aspect, after the directional sensor has verified the presence of an object of interest, the magnetic signature captured by the low-power sensor magnetometer can be inverted and used to determine the departure of the object of interest from the parking space. The departure indication can be used to reset any time remaining on the parking meter to zero or to some other desired amount of remaining time
In
In
Referring to
The wireless transceiver 9 of the parking meter 10-3 may be an infrared (IR) transceiver that emits an infrared beam for data communication. In that case, the transceiver 9 is aligned with the tag 3-2 such that the infrared beam of the transceiver is properly targeted at the tag 3-2.
In one embodiment, the wired tag 3-1 or the wireless tag 3-2 is used to monitor the content of the cash collection box 4. Each tag 3 has a unique identifier that identifies the parking meter 10 with which it is used, and that is associated with a unique physical location where the parking meter is fixedly located, e.g., the location of the pole 8 and the location housing 2. Each tag 3 has a unique ID which is transmitted to the central management system. The ID is logically connected in the management system's database to that meter pole 8 and location specific settings. Therefore, the removable parking meter unit 6 may receive the correct hours of operation, rate tables, and other location-specific data related to that meter pole 8 associated with a specific parking space.
The embodiment of the location housing 2 in
The control module 16 includes one or more processors such as application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), digital signal processors (DSPs), digital signal processing devices (DSPDs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), processors, controllers, micro-controllers, microprocessors, other electronic units designed to perform the functions described herein, and/or a combination thereof. The control module 16 also includes one or more storage mediums. A storage medium can include one or more memories for storing data, including read only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), magnetic RAM, core memory, magnetic disk storage mediums, optical storage mediums, flash memory devices and/or other machine readable mediums for storing information.
The user interface 18 provides a means for a location user to interact with the meter unit 6-1 and can include, for example, a display, one or more lights, and a keypad. The user interface 18 can provide a payment interface including a currency receiver for receiving coins and/or bills from a user in payment for using the parking location, as well as a reader for processing credit cards, debit cards, payment tokens, or proximity cards like Paywave™ and Paypass™ or NFC solutions like Google Wallet™ and the like. The control module 16 is coupled to the user payment interface and is configured to receive payment information regarding the amount of a payment and/or card or token information received at the payment interface. The control module 16 communicates the payment information from the user interface 18, via the radio transceiver 12, with the remote data manager. The one or more lights of the user interface 18 can be used as an indicator as to the payment status or, as discussed further below, can be used to produce an indication that a parking space that is associated with the location of the meter 10 is occupied.
In this example, the low-power sensor comprising the proximity sensor 20, and the directional sensor 22, are located within or attached to the removable meter unit 6 of the parking meter 10-1. Alternatively, the proximity sensor 20 and the directional sensor 22 could be located on another portion of the meter 10-1 and/or could be located on the pole 8. The proximity sensor 20 is coupled to the control module 16 and communicates a trigger signal to the control module 16 when a proximity measurement exceeds a threshold level. Upon receiving the trigger signal from the proximity sensor 20 the control module 16 wakes up the directional object sensor 22 such that the directional object sensor 22 can verify if an object is not only located near the parking meter 10-1, but is located within a parking space associated with the parking meter 10-1. The directional object sensor 22 can be an optical sensor (e.g., a digital camera), a passive infrared sensor, a radar sensor, an active infrared sensor, or the like.
The meter unit 6-2 is linked to the tag 3 for data communications by a link 37. In the case where the tag 3 is a wired tag 3-1, the link 37 is the wire 5 (see
The proximity sensor 20 and the directional sensor 22 operate similarly in the meter unit 6-2 as in the meter unit 6-1 described above. In an alternative arrangement, not shown, the proximity sensor 20 and/or the directional object sensor 22 can be co-located with the housing 2, the tag 3, the cash box 4 or the pole 8. In these arrangements, the proximity sensor 20 and/or the directional object sensor 22 can be coupled to the short range interface 13 of the tag 3 or to another short range interface so as to communicate detection signals to the control module 16.
In one embodiment, the control module 16 communicates the payment information, via the link 37, to the short range interface 13 of the tag 3. The short range interface 13 then updates the optional memory module 17 based on the received payment information. The memory module 17 can add the amount of currency indicated to have been received by the received payment information to the stored amount. This is useful when the meter unit 6 is swapped for maintenance reasons as thereby coin counts can be transferred to the replacement meter unit and the coin audit reliability is maintained. In addition, the memory module 17 can also receive and store transaction-time information including the date and time of day that the payment was received. In one aspect of this embodiment, the control module 16 communicates time of day information of when a vehicle enters and leaves a parking spot, as detected by the proximity sensor 20 and the directional object sensor 22, to the tag 3.
A process for operating a parking meter 10 equipped with a low-power sensor 20 such as a proximity sensor and a directional sensor 22 can comprise the following operations (not necessarily in the order listed):
A threshold change in the magnetic field that results in detection of the object can be determined empirically. A time threshold can also be used (if change in magnetic field lasts for more than a threshold time). The magnetic field threshold and the time threshold can vary on the configuration of the parking space and the orientation of the parking meter. The sensitivity and directional gains, which can be used to tune the aim of the directional sensor, can also be determined empirically. Adaptive algorithms could be used to fine-tune the time threshold, the proximity sensor detection levels and the directional gains associated with the directional sensor.
Determining the presence of the object based on the received sensor data can include determining a confidence measure and/or a margin of error measure. For example, if the directional sensor is an ultrasonic sensor, the ultrasonic sensor receives an echo representative of a size and distance of the object. A valid vehicle detect status may be, for example, an echo from a large object at a distance between 3.0 feet and 9.0 feet. A large object at 5.0 feet would be in the middle of the expected parameters and would have a higher confidence or a smaller margin of error than a smaller object at, for example, 3.0 feet. Similarly visual detection could evaluate the size and position of the object against an expected vehicle size. The meter can vary subsequent actions depending on the confidence measure and/or the margin of error measure. For example, the meter may only report a parking violation if the vehicle presence detection is above an 80% confidence value.
In addition to detecting the object in proximity to the parking meter, the low-power proximity sensor could be used to detect when the object subsequently departs the proximity of the parking meter. For example, if the proximity sensor is a magnetometer, the control module could determine a change in magnitude of the magnetic field from a baseline value, where the baseline value is a value indicative of no object being in proximity to the parking meter. The magnetometer measurement can be a one, two, or three degrees-of-freedom (DOF) measurement that includes direction(s). Subsequent to the initial change in magnitude and direction of the magnetic field, the control module can detect an opposite change in magnitude and direction of the magnetic field and determine that the object has departed the proximity of the parking meter.
In embodiments that use a magnetometer, a baseline measurement can be determined as follows. A three DOF magnetometer returns a vector, (x, y, z), that represents the magnetic field around the meter. The baseline measurement represents an expected measurement vector (along x, y, z axes) when no vehicle is present in proximity to the meter. The baseline condition can be time-adapted to absorb a change in the environmental magnetic field or a shift in the measurement offset. Occasionally, the baseline measurement is not set or has drifted beyond a tracking window. In that case, it is beneficial to automatically determine a new baseline value without knowing when a vehicle is absent or present. The traditional way of doing this is to have a person visit the parking site and command the meter to determine a new baseline when no vehicle is present. This is time-consuming, especially in areas where there is a high occupancy rate and one must wait for a vehicle to depart.
An alternative way of determining a new baseline measurement when no vehicle is present is to have the control module of the meter receive the (x, y, z) measurements from the magnetometer after each step-change in readings. The (x, y, z) measurements are stored in a memory coupled to the control module. When sufficient measurements are captured over a minimum time period, the measurement data is analyzed to find a single cluster of readings. Because each vehicle has a different magnetic signature, the magnetic field measurement values obtained when one or more vehicles are present in proximity to the meter will be scattered substantially across the (x, y, z) space. The baseline measurements that correspond to no vehicles being present should generally be in a single cluster group in the (x, y, z) space. The center of the clustered measurements is determined and used as the new baseline measurement. That is, an object can be detected by comparing the proximity measurement to a baseline measurement, wherein the baseline measurement represents an expected proximity measurement when the object is not present, such that the object is deemed to be positively detected if the proximity measurement differs from the baseline measurement by more than a threshold value. The threshold value can be set depending on the environmental factors of the installation and types of vehicles to be detected.
The parking meter 10 described above includes a low-power proximity sensor 20 and a separate directional sensor 22. An alternative parking meter could use a single sensor including a low power proximity sensor integrated with a directional sensor. The integrated sensor would operate in a low power mode with only the low-power proximity sensor active and, when the proximity sensor detects an object in proximity to the meter, the directional sensor would be activated to detect the presence of the object in a predetermined location relative to the meter. Yet another alternative parking meter could use a single sensor that operates in a low-power mode and in a high-power mode. In the low-power mode, the single sensor of this alternative would be able to detect an object in proximity to the meter, but would not be able to detect the location of the object relative to the meter (an omnidirectional mode). In the high power mode, which would be activated when the sensor in the low-power mode detects an object, the single sensor would be switched to the high-power mode in order to sense the location of the object relative to the meter (a directional mode).
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/383,203, filed on Apr. 12, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/633,290, filed on Jun. 26, 2017, now Issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,297,150 on May 21, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/811,641, filed on Jul. 28, 2015, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,728,085 on Aug. 8, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/558,242, filed on Jul. 25, 2012, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,127,964 on Sep. 8, 2015, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/511,484, filed Jul. 25, 2011, each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties and for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2161046 | Hitzeman | Jun 1939 | A |
2822682 | Sollenberger | Feb 1958 | A |
2832506 | Hatcher | Apr 1958 | A |
D189106 | Leiderman | Oct 1960 | S |
2988191 | Grant | Jun 1961 | A |
3183411 | Palfi | May 1965 | A |
3535870 | Mitchell | Oct 1970 | A |
3721463 | Attwood et al. | Mar 1973 | A |
3999372 | Welch | Dec 1976 | A |
4025791 | Lennington | May 1977 | A |
4043117 | Maresca | Aug 1977 | A |
4310890 | Trehn et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4460965 | Trehn et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4812805 | Lachat et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4823928 | Speas | Apr 1989 | A |
4825425 | Turner | Apr 1989 | A |
4875598 | Dahl | Oct 1989 | A |
4880097 | Speas | Nov 1989 | A |
4895238 | Speas | Jan 1990 | A |
5036859 | Brown | Aug 1991 | A |
5065156 | Bernier | Nov 1991 | A |
5201396 | Chalabian et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5222076 | Ng et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5244070 | Carmen et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5273151 | Carmen et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5360095 | Speas | Nov 1994 | A |
5426363 | Akagi et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5442348 | Mushell | Aug 1995 | A |
5471139 | Zadoff | Nov 1995 | A |
5563491 | Tseng | Oct 1996 | A |
5614892 | Ward, II et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5617942 | Ward, II et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5640002 | Ruppert et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642119 | Jacobs | Jun 1997 | A |
5648906 | Amirpanahi | Jul 1997 | A |
5659306 | Bahar | Aug 1997 | A |
5710743 | Dee | Jan 1998 | A |
5737710 | Anthonyson | Apr 1998 | A |
5777951 | Mitschele | Jul 1998 | A |
5778067 | Jones et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5806651 | Carmen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
D400115 | Yaron et al. | Oct 1998 | S |
5833042 | Baitch et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841369 | Sutton et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842411 | Johnson | Dec 1998 | A |
5845268 | Moore | Dec 1998 | A |
5852411 | Jacobs et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5954182 | Wei | Sep 1999 | A |
6037880 | Manion | Mar 2000 | A |
6078272 | Jacobs et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081205 | Williams | Jun 2000 | A |
6111522 | Hiltz et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6116403 | Kiehl | Sep 2000 | A |
6195015 | Jacobs et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
D439591 | Reidt et al. | Mar 2001 | S |
6229455 | Yost | May 2001 | B1 |
6230868 | Tuxen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
D447714 | Cappiello | Sep 2001 | S |
D449010 | Petrucelli | Oct 2001 | S |
6309098 | Wong | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312152 | Dee et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
RE37531 | Chaco et al. | Jan 2002 | E |
D454807 | Cappiello | Mar 2002 | S |
6373422 | Mostafa | Apr 2002 | B1 |
D461728 | Tuxen et al. | Aug 2002 | S |
6456491 | Flannery et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
D463749 | Petrucelli | Oct 2002 | S |
6457586 | Yasuda et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6505774 | Fulcher et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6559776 | Katz | May 2003 | B2 |
6697730 | Dickerson | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6747575 | Chauvin et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6812857 | Kassab et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6856922 | Austin et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6885311 | Howard et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6914411 | Couch et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6929179 | Fulcher et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7019420 | Kogan et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7019670 | Bahar | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7023360 | Staniszewski et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027773 | McMillin | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7029167 | Mitschele | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7183999 | Matthews et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7222031 | Heatley | May 2007 | B2 |
7237716 | Silberberg | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7388349 | Elder et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
D575168 | King et al. | Aug 2008 | S |
D587141 | King et al. | Feb 2009 | S |
7748620 | Gomez et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7772720 | McGee et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7783530 | Slemmer et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7806248 | Hunter et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7825826 | Welch et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7854310 | King et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7855661 | Ponert | Dec 2010 | B2 |
D635035 | Matsumoto | Mar 2011 | S |
7933841 | Schmeyer et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
D654816 | Mackay et al. | Feb 2012 | S |
D656046 | Mackay et al. | Mar 2012 | S |
8138950 | Leung | Mar 2012 | B1 |
D661603 | Mackay et al. | Jun 2012 | S |
8279107 | Krstanovic et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8395532 | Chauvin | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8479909 | King et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8513832 | Hunter et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
D690771 | Randall | Oct 2013 | S |
8566159 | King et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
D692784 | Anderssen et al. | Nov 2013 | S |
8590687 | King et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8595054 | King et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8631921 | Jones et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8684158 | Jones | Apr 2014 | B2 |
D705090 | Mackay et al. | May 2014 | S |
D707140 | King et al. | Jun 2014 | S |
D707141 | King et al. | Jun 2014 | S |
D707142 | King et al. | Jun 2014 | S |
8749403 | King et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8770371 | Mackay et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8862494 | King et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8884785 | Groft et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9002723 | King et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9047712 | King et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9127964 | Schwarz | Sep 2015 | B2 |
D749000 | King et al. | Feb 2016 | S |
D750513 | King et al. | Mar 2016 | S |
D756807 | King et al. | May 2016 | S |
D756808 | King et al. | May 2016 | S |
9391474 | Hunter et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9424691 | King et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9489776 | Kell et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9508198 | King et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9661403 | King et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9685027 | King et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9707911 | Myers | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9728085 | Schwarz et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9779565 | Rabbat | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9805518 | King et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
10154029 | Griffin | Dec 2018 | B1 |
10262345 | King et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10297150 | Schwarz et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10299018 | King et al. | May 2019 | B1 |
10315665 | Halder | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10366546 | King et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10423980 | King et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10464530 | Falkson | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10491972 | King et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10503990 | Gleeson-May | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10664880 | King et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10674236 | King et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10741064 | Schwarz et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
11132723 | King et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11172274 | King et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
20010047278 | Brookner et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051531 | Singhal et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020008639 | Dee | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020109609 | Potter, Sr. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020109611 | Howard | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111768 | Ghorayeb | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030092387 | Hjelmvik | May 2003 | A1 |
20030112597 | Smith | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030121754 | King | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030128010 | Hsu | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030128136 | Spier et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140531 | Pippins | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144972 | Cordery et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030169183 | Korepanov | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030179107 | Kibria et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030220835 | Barnes et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030222792 | Berman | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040068434 | Kanekon | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040084278 | Harris et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040094619 | Silberberg | May 2004 | A1 |
20040181496 | Odinotski et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040254840 | Slemmer et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264302 | Ward | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050040951 | Zalewski et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050099320 | Nath et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050155839 | Banks et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050178639 | Brumfield et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192911 | Mattern | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050226201 | McMillin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060021848 | Smith | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060028919 | Mitschele | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060052055 | Rowse et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060116972 | Wong | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136131 | Dugan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149684 | Matsuura et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060152349 | Ratnakar | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060267799 | Mendelson | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070016539 | Groft et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070040449 | Spurlin et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070094153 | Ferraro | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070114849 | Falik et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070119682 | Banks et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070136128 | Janacek et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070184852 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070210935 | Yost | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070285281 | Welch | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080052254 | Al et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080071611 | Lovett | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080093454 | Yamazaki et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080147268 | Fuller | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080208680 | Cho | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080238715 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270227 | Al Amri | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080277468 | Mitschele | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080291054 | Graft | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080319837 | Mitschele | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090109062 | An | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090183966 | King et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192950 | King et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090267732 | Chauvin et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090284907 | Regimbal et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090315720 | Clement et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100106517 | Kociubinski et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100188932 | Hanks et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100332394 | Ioli | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110057815 | King | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110060653 | King | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110063133 | Keller et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110313822 | Burdick | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320243 | Khan | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120084210 | Farahmand | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120158466 | John | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120215375 | Chang | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120222935 | Mackay et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120285790 | Jones | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120285791 | Jones | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120285792 | Jones | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120285793 | Jones et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120286036 | Jones et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120292385 | Mackay et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130005445 | Walker et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130027218 | Schwarz | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130099943 | Subramanya | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130116952 | Chai | May 2013 | A1 |
20140041301 | Oakley | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140108107 | Jones | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140129158 | Shea | May 2014 | A1 |
20140174881 | King et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140210646 | Subramanya | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140214499 | Hudson et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140214500 | Hudson et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140229246 | Ghaffari | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140289025 | King et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150045984 | Hui | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150106172 | Salama | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150120336 | Grokop | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150191178 | Roy | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150242605 | Du | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150283902 | Tuukkanen | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150332587 | Schwarz | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160001782 | Fiedler | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160086397 | Phillips | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20170098339 | Keller et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170186054 | Fish | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170197568 | Decia | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170320501 | Li | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170369071 | Gould | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180018179 | Scheufler | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180025549 | King et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180339708 | Geller | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180342165 | Sweeney et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190066424 | Hassani | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190220011 | Della Penna | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190227954 | Shi | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20200160263 | Kuettner | May 2020 | A1 |
20200276503 | Marchiorello | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200310528 | Upmanue | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200334581 | Skaling | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200349666 | Hodge | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200364967 | Spice | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20210319485 | King et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2377010 | Oct 2001 | CA |
2363915 | May 2003 | CA |
0329129 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0980055 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1128350 | Oct 2007 | EP |
2837583 | Sep 2003 | FR |
149880 | Jun 2007 | IL |
S5259000 | May 1977 | JP |
S58121494 | Jul 1983 | JP |
2002042181 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002099640 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2005267430 | Sep 2005 | JP |
20050038077 | Apr 2005 | KR |
WO-2005031494 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO-2006095352 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO-2009154787 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO-2014014494 | Jan 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Cell Net Data Systems. First Wireless Monitoring of Parking Meters Results in Theft Arrests Using CellNet Data Systems Technology. PRNewswire (May 11, 1999) (2 pgs.). |
Fidelman. Time's Running Out for Parking Meters at Present Locations: $270,000 Cited as Replacement Cost. City Employees Who Ticket Motorists Find Electronic Meters Unsuitable. The Gazette, Final Edition, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Nov. 12, 2002, p. A7. |
Flatley. In San Francisco, Hackers Park for Free. Read filed under Mise. Gadgets, downloaded from www.engadget.com website on May 3, 2010. Orriginally posted on Jul. 31, 2009 (5 pgs.). |
Howland. How M2M Maximizes Denver's Revenue. Field TechnologiesOnline.com, Oct. 2011, pp. 9-12 [online] [retrieved Mar. 5, 2013], Retrieved from http://www.fieldtechnologiesonline.com/doc.mvc/How-M2M-Maximizes-Denvers-Revenue-0001 (4 pgs). |
Jim Bonfield. An Excerise in Changing The Business: Advertisingvending Machines. (4 pgs.) (Feb. 7, 2018). |
Meter Solutions, Single-Space Meters brochure, downloaded from www.duncansolutions.com website, (revised Apr. 2006) (2 pgs.). |
PCT/IB2006/054574 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 10, 2009. |
PCT/IB2006/054574 International Search Report dated Oct. 27, 2008. |
PCT/US2010/047906 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 6, 2012. |
PCT/US2010/047906 International Search Report dated Mar. 30, 2011. |
PCT/US2010/047907 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 15, 2012. |
PCT/US2010/047907 International Search Report dated Apr. 26, 2011. |
PCT/US2012/048190 International Search Report dated Jan. 22, 2013. |
Spyker et al. Predicting Capacitor Run Time For a Battery/Capacitor Hybrid Source. Power Electronic Drives and Energy Systems for Industrial Growth. 1998. Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference, pp. 809-814. |
The U.S. Conference of Mayors Presents ‘Best Practice’ Awards, Los Angeles, New Orleans, Elizabeth, N.J. and Long Beach, CA Honored for Excellence & Innovation in Public-Private partnerships, Press Release Jan. 20, 2012 (3 pgs.). |
Tung. Design of an advanced on-street parking meter. RIT Scholar Works. Thesis/Dissertation Collections (75 pgs.) (2001). |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/848,704, inventors King; David William et al., filed Apr. 14, 2020. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/525,123, inventors King; David William et al., filed Nov. 12, 2021. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/525,151, inventors King; David William et al., filed Nov. 12, 2021. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 17/525,165, inventors King; David William et al., filed Nov. 12, 2021. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 29/753,719, inventors Jones; David Andrew et al., filed Oct. 1, 2020. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 29/753,722, inventors Jones; David Andrew et al., filed Oct. 1, 2020. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200327801 A1 | Oct 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61511484 | Jul 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16383203 | Apr 2019 | US |
Child | 16913246 | US | |
Parent | 15633290 | Jun 2017 | US |
Child | 16383203 | US | |
Parent | 14811641 | Jul 2015 | US |
Child | 15633290 | US | |
Parent | 13558242 | Jul 2012 | US |
Child | 14811641 | US |