This invention relates generally to integrated circuits and, more particularly, to nonvolatile memory arrays that use magnetic memory elements with flux concentrators.
During the 1950s and 1960s, magnetic core memories were the predominant storage technology for the working memory of computing systems. The magnetic core memory technology was costly. In the 1970s, magnetic core memories were replaced with integrated circuits, including static random access memory (SRAM) and including dynamic random access memory (DRAM). Non-volatile memories, such as FLASH memory for example, have been developed to address the problem of data volatility. Because of the rapid advancement in semiconductor density coupled with the advent of the DRAM cell, magnetic storage technology was not used for high-speed on-line memory, but rather was left to be used for low-cost, high-density memory in the form of various disk drive technologies.
The semiconductor industry continuously strives to reduce the size and cost of memory, increase the speed for accessing memory, and improve the reliability of memory. One particular problem confronting the semiconductor industry is that of reducing the size of the memory cell in a Random Access Memory (RAM).
Magnetic storage such as Magnetic Random Access Memory (MRAM) technology has been proposed as a replacement or supplement to the DRAM. In the MRAM structures that are being proposed, the capacitor storage element of the DRAM cell is replaced by a magnetic element that has a magnetic moment and is characterized by a predominant or easy axis of magnetization. In the absence of an external magnetic field, the magnetic moment is oriented along the easy axis of magnetization in one of two stable states. In magnetoresistance technology, one of the stable states for the magnetic moment of the magnetic element is a high resistance state and the other of the stable states is a low resistance state.
A flux concentrator is a material that has a high permeability and that is magnetically soft. Flux concentrators concentrate magnetic flux into a desired area, and have been used in MRAM structures to minimize the current required to set the magnetization of the memory element. One example of a flux concentrator is high permeability cladding material which has been incorporated on the outside faces of conductors to focus the magnetic flux toward the magnetic element and to provide shielding from stray electric fields.
Although flux concentrators minimize the current required to set the magnetization of the memory element, they have a non-zero remanence. One definition of remanence is the magnetic inductance remaining in a magnetized substance that is no longer under external magnetic influence. Thus, flux concentrators are capable of magnetically biasing the magnetic elements in the MRAM. The magnetic biasing effect of the remanence is capable of significantly changing the amount of current required to write to the bit because the magnetic induction attributable to the remanence is summed to the current-induced magnetic flux.
Less current is required to change the stable state of the magnetic moment when the biasing effect of remanence is parallel to the current-induced magnetic flux and antiparallel to the magnetic moment of the cell such that half-select errors are capable of being more problematic. A half-select error occurs when the current in one of the lines (bit or word lines) is sufficient to write data to the memory element. That is, when a selected memory element is written, a half-select error causes other memory element(s) in the same row and/or the same column to be unintentionally written.
More current is required to produce a sufficiently large magnetic field to overcome the biasing effect of remanence when the biasing effect is antiparallel, or opposing, to the current-induced magnetic flux and parallel to the magnetic moment of the cell. If the biasing effect of remanence is too strong, the selected memory storage element is not able to be written.
Therefore, there is a need in the art to overcome the problems attributable to remanence in flux concentrators in magnetic memory elements.
The above mentioned problems are addressed by the present subject matter and will be understood by reading and studying the following specification. The present subject matter provides magnetic memory elements with low remanence flux concentrators. Flux concentrators concentrate magnetic flux into a desired area, and minimize the current required to set the magnetization of the memory element. The flux concentrator is provided with a large anisotropy to provide the flux concentrator with an easy axis of magnetization that is generally aligned with the conductor and a hard axis of magnetization that is generally orthogonal to the easy axis of magnetization. When a current-induced magnetic field is removed, the magnetization of the flux concentrator realigns with the easy axis of magnetization. As such, remanence, along with the associated biasing magnetic field to the memory element, is reduced.
One aspect of the present subject matter is a memory cell. One memory cell embodiment includes a magnetic memory element and a flux concentrator operably positioned with respect to a conductor. The conductor is adapted to provide a current-induced magnetic flux to the magnetic memory element. The flux concentrator includes an easy axis of magnetization aligned with the conductor and a hard axis of magnetization orthogonal to the easy axis of magnetization.
One aspect provides a method of writing to a magnetic storage device. According to one embodiment, a first conductor is energized to provide a first current-induced magnetic field through a first flux concentrator in a hard axis of magnetization direction. The first current-induced magnetic field is provided to the magnetic storage device. A second conductor is energized to provide a second current-induced magnetic field through a second flux concentrator in a hard axis of magnetization direction. The second current-induced magnetic field is provided to the magnetic storage device. The combination of the first current-induced magnetic field and the second current-induced magnetic field is sufficient to move a magnetic moment of the magnetic storage device from a first stable state to a second stable state. When the current-induced magnetic field is removed, the magnetization of the first and second flux concentrators realigns with their easy axis of magnetization.
One aspect provides a method of forming a memory array. According to one embodiment, at least one first flux concentrator is formed with an easy axis of magnetization. At least one first conductor is formed to be operably positioned with respect to the first flux concentrator and aligned with the easy axis of magnetization. At least one magnetic memory element is formed to be operably positioned with respect to the first flux concentrator and the first conductor so as to receive a first current-induced magnetic field. At least one second conductor is formed to be operably positioned with respect to the magnetic memory element so as to provide the magnetic memory element with a second current-induced magnetic field from the second conductor. The second current-induced magnetic field is relatively orthogonal to the first current-induced magnetic field. At least one second flux concentrator is formed to be operably positioned with respect to the second conductor. The second flux concentrator is formed with an easy axis of magnetization aligned with the second conductor.
These and other aspects, embodiments, advantages, and features will become apparent from the following description of the invention and the referenced drawings.
The following detailed description of the invention refers to the accompanying drawings which show, by way of illustration, specific aspects and embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. In the drawings, like numerals describe substantially similar components throughout the several views. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention. Other embodiments may be utilized and structural, logical, and electrical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined only by the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
The present subject matter provides magnetic memory elements with low remanence flux concentrators. The flux concentrator is provided with a large anisotropy to provide the flux concentrator with an easy axis of magnetization that is generally aligned with the conductor and a hard axis of magnetization that is generally orthogonal to the easy axis of magnetization.
MRAM Overview
It is noted that magnetic flux density B is related to magnetic field strength H by the equation B=μH, where μ is the permeability of the solid. The magnetic flux density resulting from the bit line current IBIT is represented by the nomenclature BBIT, and the magnetic flux density resulting from word line current IWORD is represented by the nomenclature BWORD. At the magnetic storage element 704, the lines of BWORD are directed toward the right and the lines of BBIT are directed into the page.
Flux Concentrator
It is noted that magnetic flux density B is related to magnetic field strength H by the equation B=μH, where μ is the permeability of the solid. Thus, the flux density B is higher in materials with higher permeability μ. Flux concentrators are formed from a highly permeable ferromagnetic material to enhance the magnetic flux density around the magnetic storage element. A flux concentrator is a material that has a high permeability and that is magnetically soft. Flux concentrators concentrate magnetic flux into a desired area, and have been used in MRAM structures to minimize the current required to set the magnetization of the memory element.
Remanence Of Flux Concentrators
One of ordinary skill in the art will understand the concept of remanence. For the convenience of the reader, the concept of remanence is developed below with respect to
The figures described below illustrate a crystalline ferromagnetic structure as an example. One of ordinary skill in the art will understand, upon reading and comprehending this disclosure, that the present subject matter is not limited to crystalline structures as other structures such as polycrystalline structures can be used.
Remanence Biasing Effect
Although flux concentrators minimize the current required to set the magnetization of the memory element, they are capable of having a non-zero remanence. Thus, flux concentrators are capable of magnetically biasing the magnetic elements in the MRAM. The magnetic biasing effect of the remanence is capable of significantly changing the amount of current required to write to the bit because the magnetic field attributable to the remanence is summed to the current-induced magnetic field.
Since the position of the astroid is shifted, the fields required to write the bit are also shifted, which can cause problems as described below.
Half Selection Problem
Write Inhibit Problem
Flux Concentrator With Anisotropy
The large anistropy produces an easy axis of magnetization 3114 that is aligned with the conductor. In effect, the flux concentrator has a saturated magnetization. Current flow in the conductor produces a magnetic field orthogonal to the easy axis of magnetization (i.e. produces a magnetic field along the hard axis of magnetization). Because of the effectively saturated magnetization in the flux concentrator caused by the large anistropy, when the flux concentrator is under a current-induced field, the resulting magnetic moments 3116 in the flux concentrator changes through rotation rather than through domain wall motion. When the current-induced field is removed from the flux concentrator, the large anistropy rotates the magnetic moments back to being aligned with the conductor. As such, each flux concentrator does not retain an orthogonal remanent magnetic flux density (i.e. remanence).
In one embodiment, anisotropy is created in the flux concentrator using a material that is capable of being annealed in a magnetic field in order to produce a magnetic anisotropy parallel to the direction of the applied field. In one embodiment, the flux concentrator includes NiCoFe. According to various embodiments, the flux concentrator includes, but is not limited to, an alloy of Cobalt, an alloy of Iron, and an alloy of Nickel. According to various embodiments, these alloys can include additions of Copper and/or Molybdenum. According to various embodiments, the flux concentrator includes, but is not limited to, various combinations of an alloy of Cobalt, an alloy of Iron, and an alloy of Nickel. According to various embodiments, these combinations can include additions of Copper and/or Molybdenum. The magnitude of the resulting anistropic field is expected to be on the order of 10 Oe.
In one embodiment, a larger anistropic field is capable of being created in the flux concentrator by including a field pinning structure effectively near the flux concentrator. The magnitude of the resulting anistropic field is expected to be on the order of 100 Oe. One such embodiment is described below with respect to
According to various embodiments, the FM layer includes, but is not limited to, an alloy of Cobalt, an alloy of Iron, and an alloy of Nickel. According to various embodiments, these alloys can include additions of Copper and/or Molybdenum. According to various embodiments, the FM layer includes, but is not limited to, various combinations of an alloy of Cobalt, an alloy of Iron, and an alloy of Nickel. According to various embodiments, these combinations can include additions of Copper and/or Molybdenum. According to various embodiments, the AFM layer includes, but is not limited to, NiMn, FeMn, IrMn, or PtMn.
The first FM layer 3222 functions as a seeding layer for the AFM layer 3224 so that the AFM layer is oriented as desired. The second FM layer 3226 is formed on the AFM layer. The FM layer functions as a pinning field layer because of the orientation of the AFM layer. The pinning field functions like a large anisotropy in the cladding if there is a good magnetic contact between the cladding material and the FM/AFM/FM sandwich. It is noted that the interface between the cladding and the top FM layer need not be as clean or smooth as that of a tunnel barrier interface. As such, it FM/AFM/FM sandwich is capable of being used as an etch stop layer while forming a trench for a damascene copper line, for example. According to various embodiments, the FM layer includes, but is not limited to, alloys of Ni, Fe or Co, or various combinations thereof. According to various embodiments, the AFM layer includes, but is not limited to, NiMn, FeMn, IrMn and/or PtMn.
MRAM Array Level
System Level
One of ordinary skill in the art will understand, upon reading and comprehending this disclosure, how to incorporate this MRAM technology into a variety of devices. These devices include giant magnetoresistance (GMR) devices, tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR) with magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) devices, diode-isolated MTJ devices, transistor-isolated MTJ devices, and hall effect storage devices.
With respect to GMR technology, each memory cell is a “spin-valve” cell comprising two thin layers of ferromagnetic material separated by a thin layer of nonmagnetic metallic conducting material. The resistance of the sensing layer varies as a function of the spin-dependent transmission of the conduction electrons between magnetic layers separated by a non-magnetic layer (spacer) and the accompanying spin-dependent scattering which takes place at the interface of the magnetic and non-magnetic layers and within the magnetic layers.
TMR uses magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) devices. The MTJ device comprises two ferromagnetic layers separated by a thin, electrically insulating, tunnel barrier layer. The tunnel barrier layer is sufficiently thin that quantum-mechanical tunneling of charge carriers occurs between the ferromagnetic layers. The tunneling process is electron spin dependent which means that the tunneling current across the junction depends on the spin-dependent electronic properties of the ferromagnetic materials, and is a function of the relative orientation of the magnetic moments, or magnetization directions, of the two ferromagnetic layers. In the MTJ sensor, one ferromagnetic layer has its magnetic moment fixed or pinned, and the other ferromagnetic layer has its magnetic moment free to rotate in response to an external magnetic filed from the recording medium. When an electric potential is applied between the two ferromagnetic layers, the sensor resistance is a function of the tunneling current across the insulating layer between the ferromagnetic layers. Since the tunneling current that flows perpendicularly through the tunnel barrier layer depends on the relative magnetization directions of the two ferromagnetic layers, recorded data can be read from a magnetic medium because the signal field causes a change of direction of magnetization of the free layer, which in turn causes a change in resistance of the MTJ sensor, and a corresponding change in the sensed current or voltage.
A diode isolated MTJ device is a memory cell that includes a diode connected in series with an MTJ device. A transistor isolated MTJ device is a memory cell that includes a transistor connected in series with an MTJ. One reason for incorporating a diode or a transistor in series with an MTJ device is for read-select purposes; i.e. current is passed only through the selected MTJ.
A hall effect storage device is a memory device whose operation is based on the Hall effect. When a magnetic field is applied to a conductor carrying current, in a direction at right angles to the current, and electromotive force is produced across the conductor in a direction perpendicular to both the current and to the magnetic field. A hall effect storage device includes magnetic patch which stores data in the form of a magnetic field and a Hall-effect sensor for reading the stored data from the magnetic patch. Each sensor comprises a Hall bar and a detector means. As current is made to flow down the length of the Hall bar by an external means, a Hall voltage is developed across the Hall bar in a direction transverse to the direction of both the magnetic field and the current. The detector means is coupled to the Hall bar in such a way that it detects the Hall voltage, which itself is representative of the stored information. A magnetizing means is included for writing data or other information to each magnetic patch.
The figures presented and described in detail above are similarly useful in describing the method aspects of the present subject matter. The methods described below are nonexclusive as other methods may be understood from the specification and the figures described above.
One aspect provides a method of writing to a magnetic storage device. According to one embodiment, a first conductor is energized to provide a first current-induced magnetic flux through a first flux concentrator in a hard axis of magnetization direction. The first current-induced magnetic flux is provided to the magnetic storage device. A second conductor is energized to provide a second current-induced magnetic flux through a second flux concentrator in a hard axis of magnetization direction. The second current-induced magnetic flux is provided to the magnetic storage device. The combination of the first current-induced magnetic flux and the second current-induced magnetic flux is sufficient to move a magnetic moment of the magnetic storage device from a first stable state to a second stable state. When the current-induced magnetic fluxes are removed, the magnetization of the flux concentrators return to their easy axis of magnetization.
One aspect provides a method of forming a memory array. According to one embodiment, at least one first flux concentrator is formed with an easy axis of magnetization. At least one first conductor is formed to be operably positioned with respect to the first flux concentrator and aligned with the easy axis of magnetization. At least one magnetic memory element is formed to be operably positioned with respect to the first flux concentrator and the first conductor so as to receive a first current-induced magnetic flux. At least one second conductor is formed to be operably positioned with respect to the magnetic memory element so as to provide the magnetic memory element with a second current-induced magnetic flux from the second conductor. The second current-induced magnetic flux is relatively orthogonal to the first current-induced magnetic flux. At least one second flux concentrator is formed to be operably positioned with respect to the second conductor. The second flux concentrator is formed with an easy axis of magnetization aligned with the second conductor.
The present subject matter provides magnetic memory elements with low remanence flux concentrators. Flux concentrators concentrate magnetic flux into a desired area, and minimize the current required to set the magnetization of the memory element. The flux concentrator is provided with a large anisotropy to provide the flux concentrator with an easy axis of magnetization that is generally aligned with the conductor and a hard axis of magnetization that is generally orthogonal to the easy axis of magnetization. A current-induced magnetic field for writing to the memory elements is orthogonal to the easy axis of magnetization in the flux concentrator, such that the resulting change in magnetization in the flux concentrator is by rotation rather than by domain wall motion. When the current-induced magnetic field is removed, the magnetization of the flux concentrator realigns with the easy axis of magnetization so as to reduce remanence that provides the memory element with a biasing magnetic field.
Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that any arrangement which is calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiment shown. This application is intended to cover any adaptations or variations of the present invention. It is to be understood that the above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. Combinations of the above embodiments, and other embodiments will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. The scope of the invention includes any other applications in which the above structures and fabrication methods are used. The scope of the invention should be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
This application is a Continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 10/785,769 filed Feb. 24, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,833,278 which is a Divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/137,500 filed May 2, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,724,652. These applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4780848 | Daughton et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
5587943 | Torok et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5640343 | Gallagher et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5659499 | Chen et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5748524 | Chen et al. | May 1998 | A |
5793697 | Scheuerlein | Aug 1998 | A |
5861328 | Tehrani et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5956267 | Hurst et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5966323 | Chen et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5986858 | Sato et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6005800 | Koch | Dec 1999 | A |
6034887 | Gupta et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6081446 | Brug et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6097625 | Scheuerlein et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6097626 | Brug et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104633 | Abraham et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6134139 | Bhattacharyya et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6166948 | Parkin et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6172904 | Anthony et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174737 | Durlam et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191972 | Miura et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191973 | Moyer | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6211090 | Durlam et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6211559 | Zhu et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219212 | Gill et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219275 | Nishimura | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226160 | Gallagher et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233172 | Chen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6242770 | Bronner et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256223 | Sun et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6256247 | Perner | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259586 | Gill | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269018 | Monsma et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6326637 | Parkin et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6358757 | Anthony | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6392922 | Liu et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6430084 | Rizzo et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6430085 | Rizzo | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6510080 | Farrar | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6525957 | Goronkin et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6538917 | Tran et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6570783 | Deak | May 2003 | B1 |
6623987 | Liu et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6627932 | Drewes | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6656371 | Drewes | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6677631 | Drewes | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6683806 | Drewes | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6689622 | Drewes | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6707084 | Katti et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6716644 | Nejad et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6724652 | Deak | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728132 | Deak | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6740947 | Bhattacharyya et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6743641 | Yates et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6765823 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771533 | Witcraft et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6780653 | Nejad et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6780654 | Nejad et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6781173 | Tuttle et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6781174 | Nejad et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6806546 | Liu et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6807087 | Deak | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6816402 | Deak | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6828639 | Nejad et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6833278 | Deak | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6845036 | Witcraft et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6849464 | Drewes | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6852550 | Tuttle et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6870714 | Drewes | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6870759 | Tsang | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6881993 | Drewes et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6885073 | Drewes | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6885576 | Deak | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6900455 | Drewes | May 2005 | B1 |
6900489 | Drewes | May 2005 | B1 |
6902940 | Drewes | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6903399 | Katti et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6906396 | Tuttle et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6906950 | Zhu et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
20010025978 | Nakao | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010036675 | Anthony | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010036699 | Slaughter | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020007454 | Covington | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020044396 | Qmano et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020080645 | Liu | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020085412 | Liu et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030024465 | Perner et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030059958 | Drewes | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030090932 | Deak | May 2003 | A1 |
20030119210 | Yates et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030132494 | Tuttle et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030146459 | Katti et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030161079 | Takahashi et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030185045 | Drewes | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030189842 | Deak | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030194819 | Drewes | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030207486 | Deak | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216032 | Nejad et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030228710 | Drewes | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030228711 | Nejad | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030228713 | Nejad | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030228726 | Nejad | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030235068 | Deak | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040012056 | Nejad | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012895 | Drewes et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040014243 | Drewes | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040017639 | Deak | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040018645 | Drewes | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040027844 | Nejad et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040032765 | Deak | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040041182 | Tuttle et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040041184 | Tuttle et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040042128 | Slaughter et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040042246 | Drewes et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040042258 | Witcraft | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040042260 | Deak | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040042315 | Drewes | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040052150 | Drewes | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040061154 | Huai et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040062081 | Drewes | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040066667 | Deak | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040091634 | Liu et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040119095 | Tuttle et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040124485 | Yates et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040145943 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040150059 | Drewes | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040152265 | Nejad et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040155218 | Deak | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040160810 | Deak et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040166618 | Deak | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040180237 | Drewes | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040183099 | Katti et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040195639 | Drewes | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040201070 | Deak | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040202018 | Witcraft et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040217399 | Drewes | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040217403 | Drewes | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040227244 | Liu et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040234815 | Drewes | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240264 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050003561 | Drewes | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050040453 | Nejad et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050041463 | Drewes | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050047263 | Drewes et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078512 | Deak | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050079638 | Drewes et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050099844 | Witcraft et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050122773 | Deak | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050146912 | Deak | Jul 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050030786 A1 | Feb 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10137500 | May 2002 | US |
Child | 10785769 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10785769 | Feb 2004 | US |
Child | 10932949 | US |