Machine and Method for Applying a Tread to a Tyre Carcass

Abstract

A machine (1) and method for applying a tread (2) to a carcass (3) of a tire (4); the machine (1) has a rotary drum (5) supporting the carcass (3), a feed conveyor (6) for feeding the tread (2) to the rotary drum (5), a pressure roller (7) contacting the tread (2), an actuating device (8) for pushing the pressure roller (7) against the tread (2) with a force (F) of adjustable intensity, and a control unit (9) for regulating the intensity of the force (F) as a function of an error variable (E) calculated as the difference between the length (RCC) of the remaining portion of the circumference of the carcass (3), and the length (RTL) of the remaining portion of the tread (2); and the control unit (9) regulates the intensity of the force (F) by means of a proportional control block (12) having a gain (Kp) varying as a function of the value of the error variable (E) and as a function of the rate of change of the error variable (E).

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a machine and method for applying a tread to a tyre carcass.

BACKGROUND ART

A machine for applying a tread to a tyre carcass, e.g. of the type described in Patent Application EP-1230235-A2, comprises a rotary drum supporting the carcass; a feed conveyor for feeding the tread to the rotary drum; a pressure roller contacting the tread between the drum and the feed conveyor; an actuating device for pushing the pressure roller against the tread with a force of adjustable intensity; and a control unit for regulating the intensity of the force produced by the actuating device as a function of an error variable calculated as the difference between the length of the remaining portion of the circumference of the carcass, and the length of the remaining portion of the tread. Other examples of machines for applying a tread to a tyre carcass are described in Patents DE-2105765-A, U.S. Pat. No. 3,728,181-A1, U.S. Pat. No. 5,427,636-A1 and EP-0704296-A1.

The purpose of the pressure roller is to exert pulling force on, to permanently stretch, the tread; and a precise amount of permanent stretch must be produced on the tread to achieve the desired predetermined overlap of the two free ends of the tread when it is wound about the carcass.

When applying a cured new tread to a carcass as part of a tyre retreading process involving no curing, the new tread must be cut taking into account the tread pattern, and so cannot be cut exactly to size with respect to the actual circumference of the carcass. The tread-stretching action of the pressure roller is therefore essential in ensuring correct application of the tread to the carcass. When applying a green tread to a carcass as part of the original tyre manufacturing process or as part of a tyre retreading and curing process, the new tread is cut exactly to size with respect to the actual circumference of the carcass, but may subsequently undergo a slight, unpredictable variation in length due to shrinkage caused by changes in temperature. In which case, the tread-stretching action of the pressure roller may prove useful in ensuring correct application of the tread to the carcass.

The control unit of known machines for applying a tread to a tyre carcass, e.g. of the type marketed by SH under the trade name “Hitech Extru-Builder Baz 2160”, comprises a PID (Proportional-Derivative-Integral) control block, which regulates the intensity of the force produced by the actuating device as a function of the error variable.

Numerous tests show precise tread stretch by the pressure roller of known machines for applying a tread to a tyre carcass to be extremely difficult to achieve. To increase tread stretch precision of the pressure roller, it has been proposed to increase gain of the integral contribution, which, however, results in oscillating and potentially unstable control, with obvious anomalous stress of the tread. To reduce oscillation, therefore, it has been proposed to increase gain of the derivative contribution, which in turn reduces control speed and prevents sufficient error reduction in the time taken to apply the tread.

DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION

It is an object of the present invention to provide a machine and method for applying a tread to a tyre carcass, designed to eliminate the aforementioned drawbacks, and which, in particular, are cheap and easy to implement.

According to the present invention, there are provided a machine and method for applying a tread to a tyre carcass, as recited in the accompanying Claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A non-limiting embodiment of the present invention will be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 shows a schematic view in perspective of a machine for applying a tread to a tyre carcass in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 2 shows a diagram of a control unit of the FIG. 1 machine;

FIG. 3 shows a graph of an error variable controlled by the FIG. 2 control unit.

BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

Number 1 in FIG. 1 indicates as a whole a machine for applying a tread 2 to a carcass 3 of a tyre 4. Machine 1 comprises a rotary drum 5 supporting carcass 3; a feed conveyor 6 for feeding tread 2 to rotary drum 5; a pressure roller 7 contacting tread 2 between drum 5 and feed conveyor 6; and an actuating device 8 (in particular, a pneumatic piston controlled by a proportional solenoid valve) for pushing pressure roller 7 against tread 2 with a force F of adjustable intensity.

A control unit 9 regulates the intensity of force F produced by actuating device 8 as a function of an error variable E calculated as the difference between the length RCC of the remaining portion of the circumference of carcass 3, and the length RTL of the remaining portion of tread 2. To do this, control unit 9 is connected to a sensor 10 for measuring feed of tread 2, i.e. for measuring the value of length RTL of the remaining portion of tread 2; and to a sensor 11 for measuring rotation of carcass 3, i.e. for measuring length RCC of the remaining portion of the circumference of carcass 3.

The purpose of control unit 9 is to zero the value of error variable E by the time tread 2 is applied to carcass 3. A constant quantity or so-called “Stretch Factor” may be added automatically to error variable E to achieve a given overlap of the two ends of tread 2.

As shown in FIG. 2, control unit 9 comprises a proportional control block 12 having a variable gain Kp, and which regulates the intensity of force F produced by actuating device 8 as a function of error variable E. The value of gain Kp of proportional control block 12 is modified dynamically by a computing block 13 as a function of the value of error variable E, and as a function of the rate of change, i.e. the first derivative, of error variable E.

In a preferred embodiment, computing block 13 checks gain Kp of proportional control block 12 with a given time frequency, and, for each check, operates according to the following control strategy:

computing block 13 maintains gain Kp of proportional control block 12 constant when the absolute value of error variable E is above a threshold EL, and when the rate of change of error variable E, in absolute value, is above a threshold VL;

computing block 13 increases gain Kp of proportional control block 12 when the absolute value of error variable E is above threshold EL, and when the rate of change of error variable E, in absolute value, is below threshold VL;

computing block 13 reduces gain Kp of proportional control block 12 when the absolute value of error variable E is below threshold EL, and when the rate of change of error variable E, in absolute value, is above threshold VL; and

computing block 13 maintains gain Kp of proportional control block 12 constant when the absolute value of error variable E is below threshold EL, and when the rate of change of error variable E, in absolute value, is below threshold VL.

Good test results have been obtained when computing block 13, if necessary, modifies gain Kp of proportional control block 12 at 2 Hz frequency and by a given IGF quantity equal to 50% of the initial value of gain Kp of proportional control block 12; and even better test results, in terms of speed and precision, have been obtained when a constant so-called “Fixed Pressure” quantity is added to the output value of proportional control block 12.

Threshold EL preferably has a first value when error variable E is positive, and a second value when error variable E is negative, i.e. the absolute value of threshold EL differs, depending on whether error variable E is positive or negative. Typically, the absolute value of threshold EL is higher when error variable E is positive than when error variable E is negative.

In an alternative embodiment, computing block 13 only adjusts gain Kp of proportional control block 12 as a function of the value of error variable E, without taking into account the rate of change of error variable E. More specifically, computing block 13 increases gain Kp of proportional control block 12 when the absolute value of error variable E is above a threshold VS1; reduces gain Kp of proportional control block 12 when the absolute value of error variable E is below a threshold VS2; and maintains gain Kp of proportional control block 12 constant when the absolute value of error variable E lies between threshold VS1 and threshold VS2.

FIG. 3 shows the results of two tests, and more specifically a time graph of error variable E relative to two different applications of tread 2.

The parameter values of control unit 9—i.e. the initial value of gain Kp of proportional control block 12, the update frequency of gain Kp of proportional control block 12, and the IGF quantity by which gain Kp of proportional control block 12 is varied—are determined experimentally, and normally depend on the construction characteristics of the control unit. Optimum “Fixed Pressure” and “Stretch Factor” values must also be determined experimentally for different types of tread 2.

Machine 1 as described above may be used, with excellent results, for applying a cured new tread to a carcass as part of a tyre retreading process involving no curing, or for applying a green tread to a carcass as a part of the original tyre manufacturing process or as part of a tyre retreading and curing process. Tests of both applications show machine 1, as described above, ensures a highly precise and, above all, constant final value of error variable E.

Claims

1. A machine (1) for applying a tread (2) to a carcass (3) of a tyre (4); the machine (1) comprising: a rotary drum (5) supporting the carcass (3);a feed conveyor (6) for feeding the tread (2) to the rotary drum (5);a pressure roller (7) contacting the tread (2) between the rotary drum (5) and the feed conveyor (6);an actuating device (8) for pushing the pressure roller (7) against the tread (2) with a force (F) of adjustable intensity; anda control unit (9) for regulating the intensity of the force (F) produced by the actuating device (8) as a function of an error variable (E) calculated as the difference between the length (RCC) of the remaining portion of the circumference of the carcass (3), and the length (RTL) of the remaining portion of the tread (2);and the machine (1) being characterized in that the control unit (9) comprises a proportional control block (12) having a variable gain (Kp) and which regulates the intensity of the force (F) produced by the actuating device (8) as a function of the error variable (E); and a computing block (13) which varies the gain (Kp) of the proportional control block (12) as a function of the value of the error variable (E).

2. A machine (1) as claimed in claim 1, wherein the computing block (13) varies the gain (Kp) of the proportional control block (12) as a function of the value of the error variable (E) and as a function of the rate of change of the error variable (E).

3. A machine (1) as claimed in claim 2, wherein: the computing block (13) maintains the gain (Kp) of the proportional control block (12) constant when the value of the error variable (E) is above a first threshold (EL) in absolute value, and when the rate of change of the error variable (E) is above a second threshold (VL) in absolute value; the computing block (13) increases the gain (Kp) of the proportional control block (12) when the value of the error variable (E) is above the first threshold (EL) in absolute value, and when the rate of change of the error variable (E) is below the second threshold (VL) in absolute value;the computing block (13) reduces the gain (Kp) of the proportional control block (12) when the value of the error variable (E) is below the first threshold (EL) in absolute value, and when the rate of change of the error variable (E) is above the second threshold (VL) in absolute value;the computing block (13) maintains the gain (Kp) of the proportional control block (12) constant when the value of the error variable (E) is below the first threshold (EL) in absolute value, and when the rate of change of the error variable (E) is below the second threshold (VL) I absolute value.

4. A machine (1) as claimed in claim 2, wherein the computing block (13) increases the gain (Kp) of the proportional control block (12) when the value of the error variable (E) is above a first threshold (EL) in absolute value, and when the rate of change of the error variable (E) is below a second threshold (VL) in absolute value.

5. A machine (1) as claimed in claim 2, wherein the computing block (13) reduces the gain (Kp) of the proportional control block (12) when the value of the error variable (E) is below a first threshold (EL) in absolute value, and when the rate of change of the error variable (E) is above a second threshold (VL) in absolute value.

6. A machine (1) as claimed in claim 3, wherein the computing block (13) modifies the gain (Kp) of the proportional control block (12) with a frequency of 2 Hz and by a given quantity (IGF) equal to 50% of the initial value of the gain (Kp) of the proportional control block (12).

7. A machine (1) as claimed in claim 3, wherein the first threshold (EL) has a first value when the error variable (E) is positive, and a second value when the error variable (E) is negative.

8. A machine (1) as claimed in claim 7, wherein the first value of the first threshold (EL) is higher than the second value of the first threshold (EL).

9. A machine (1) as claimed in claim 1, wherein the computing block (13) increases the gain (Kp) of the proportional control block (12) when the absolute value of the error variable (E) is above a third threshold (VS1), reduces the gain (Kp) of the proportional control block (12) when the absolute value of the error variable (E) is below a fourth threshold (VS2), and maintains the gain (Kp) of the proportional control block (12) constant when the absolute value of the error variable (E) lies between the third threshold (VS 1) and the fourth threshold (VS2).

10. A machine as claimed in claim 1, wherein a first constant quantity is added automatically to the error variable (E) to obtain a given overlap of the two ends of the tread (2).

11. A machine as claimed in claim 1, wherein a second constant quantity is added to an output value of the proportional control block (12).

12. A method of applying a tread (2) to a carcass (3) of a tyre (4); the method comprising: mounting the carcass (3) onto a rotary drum (5);applying a first end of the tread (2) to the carcass (3);feeding the tread (2) to the carcass (3), while at the same time rotating the rotary drum (5);applying a pressure force (F) on the tread (2) by means of a pressure roller (7) contacting the tread (2) between the rotary drum (5) and a feed conveyor (6) for feeding the tread (2);calculating an error variable (E) as the difference between the length (RCC) of the remaining portion of the circumference of the carcass (3), and the length (RTL) of the remaining portion of the tread (2); andregulating the intensity of the force (F) applied by the pressure roller (7) as a function of the error variable (E);the method being characterized by regulating the intensity of the force (F) applied by the pressure roller (7) by means of a proportional control block (12) having a variable gain (Kp); and by varying the gain (Kp) of the proportional control block (12) as a function of the value of the error variable (E).

13. A method as claimed in claim 12, wherein the gain (Kp) of the proportional control block (12) is varied as a function of the value of the error variable (E), and as a function of the rate of change of the error variable (E).

14. A method as claimed in claim 13, wherein: the gain (Kp) of the proportional control block (12) is maintained constant when the value of the error variable (E) is above a first threshold (EL) in absolute value, and when the rate of change of the error variable (E) is above a second threshold (VL) in absolute value;the gain (Kp) of the proportional control block (12) is increased when the value of the error variable (E) is above the first threshold (EL) in absolute value, and when the rate of change of the error variable (E) is below the second threshold (VL) in absolute value;the gain (Kp) of the proportional control block (12) is reduced when the value of the error variable (E) is below the first threshold (EL) in absolute value, and when the rate of change of the error variable (E) is above the second threshold (VL) in absolute value;the gain (Kp) of the proportional control block (12) is maintained constant when the value of the error variable (E) is below the first threshold (EL) in absolute value, and when the rate of change of the error variable (E) is below the second threshold (VL) in absolute value.

15. A method as claimed in claim 12, wherein a first constant quantity is added automatically to the error variable (E) to obtain a given overlap of the two ends of the tread (2).

16. A method as claimed in claim 12, wherein a second constant quantity is added to an output value of the proportional control block (12).