This invention relates generally to the field of telecommunications and more specifically it relates to a machine and process for rapidly accepting customer payments and placing orders for telecommunications services.
Since the inception of facility based call processing in correctional facilities, telecommunications providers have struggled with a variety of issues including new account set-up, collection of monies, and posting of payments in a timely manner. New account set-up for inmates and friends or family that desire to engage in telephone conversations with an inmate may take as long as two to three business days. Once the account is set-up then the issue of payment method must be resolved. Currently, telecommunications providers will accept payment by check or money order via the US Postal Service; by credit card, debit card, or direct funds transfer from an existing checking account via an Interactive Voice Response System accessed by telephone; or by Western Union.
Because customers expect fast and efficient service, the above described system tends to create customer service calls that costs to the telecommunication provider. Therefore, it would be preferred to have a system that can establish new accounts rapidly and reduce customer service calls relating to account set-up delays.
Customers also expect to be able to use cash for most transactions without a penalty. The current system requires a money order and the delay of mailing to hinder the use of cash in the telecommunication service transaction. Therefore, it would be preferred to have a system that allowed easy cash payment to set-up and maintain telecommunication service for an inmate by the inmate at booking, by the inmate during incarceration, and by friends or family who are not incarcerated.
As an attempt to address some of the delays in set-up, telecommunications providers have incurred high levels of bad debt. Bad debt is expensive to incur because of the administrative overhead involved in carrying and managing the debt as well as the direct write-offs. It would be preferred to have a system that quickly verified payments to reduce bad debt while also providing quick set-up and reducing calls to customer service.
A final problem facing the current system of providing telecommunications services in correctional institutions is that of the short stay inmate, for example an inmate who may stay in lockup for less than 3 days while arranging bail. The time lag for set-up for these inmates is longer than their anticipated stay, so the telecommunication provider has no opportunity to effectively serve these potential clients. This is lost business for the telecommunication provider and an aggravation for the inmate who is unable to communicate effectively with friends or family.
Although the problems listed above are specific to the correctional facilities market, similar problems are found in other situations where the invention may be helpful. Therefore, the invention described below is not to be limited to correctional facilities, nor is the invention to be limited to solving the problems listed above.
There is a need in correctional facilities and other markets for a machine and process for accepting customer payments and placing orders relating to telecommunications services.
Therefore, it is an object of the present invention to provide a machine and process for accepting customer payments and placing orders relating to telecommunications services.
This object may be achieved by providing a kiosk operable to accept account set-up information from an individual, accept payment from the individual, collect identifying data from the individual, and communicate with a system to activate a telecommunication account for the individual. The kiosk may be placed wherever quick telecommunication account set-up and payment verification is necessary, for example: a correctional facility or a college campus.
The present invention provides significant advantages, including: (1) set-up information may be collected in a variety of written languages without the need for extensive translation services; (2) payment may be verified at the point of sale thereby avoiding bad debts; (3) identifying data may be stored with a transaction record to facilitate matching the transaction to a particular person; (4) account activation may be automated and provided at the time of transaction; and (5) costs per account may be reduced by reducing costs associated with account set-up inquiries and associated customer service calls.
Additional objectives, features, and advantages of the invention will be apparent in the written description that follows.
The novel features believed characteristic of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. However, the invention itself, as well as, a preferred mode of use, and further objectives and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings:
In the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific preferred embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that logical changes may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. To avoid detail not necessary to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, the description may omit certain information known to those skilled in the art. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined only by the appended claims.
The present invention represents the discovery that a properly equipped kiosk may communicate with a properly equipped system to provide telecommunication service account set-up and payment autonomously with reduced customer service costs and reduced bad debt. The system according to the present invention is particularly useful in applications where delays may cause additional customer service calls or reduce the number of available customers, as well as applications where bad debt is expected to be high.
Referring to
Continuing with
In an embodiment, the biometric measurement devices, or sensors, may be located on the kiosk. In an additional embodiment the biometric measurement devices, or sensors, may be located around the kiosk.
In an embodiment, at least one of the speaker, microphone, digital image scanner, and camera operate covertly. For example, the kiosk is configured to operate the microphone and/or camera to record audio and video information at all times. In an additional embodiment, the kiosk is configured to operate the microphone and/or camera to record audio and video information during transactions and/or when motion has been detected. A plurality of cameras may be strategically placed on the kiosk to provide a plurality of views from specified angles.
In an embodiment, the kiosk includes at least one dispensing device (not shown) capable of remitting an amount of money in cash, check, coins, gift cards, public transportation passes, or any other acceptable item of value. In such an embodiment, upon release from incarceration, an inmate can access the kiosk and obtain the value that remains on his/her account. In an embodiment, the dispensing device includes a check printer, configured to print a check in the amount requested.
The correctional facility may distribute and/or make available a multifunction wireless devices to inmates. Such multifunction wireless devices include a laptop, smartphone, tablet, cellular telephone, or any other handheld wireless communications device. When used in a correctional facility, such multifunction wireless devices are configured to communicate with correctional facility network, exclusively. Thereby, the correctional facility is able to monitor and/or control use of the multifunction wireless devices. In an embodiment, the multifunction wireless devices are configured to transmit and receive authorized communications to/from outsiders including text, audio, or video communications routed through the secure correctional facility network.
In an embodiment, the kiosk further includes a communications port (not shown) configured to connect to a mobile electronic device. In such embodiments, the communications port transfers/receives information with the mobile electronic device, such as a multifunction wireless device. For example, in an embodiment, a user purchases approved songs, applications “apps,” games, through one or more features of the kiosk. In an embodiment, the song may be purchased by a user on behalf of an inmate, or by the inmate him/herself. Further, in an embodiment, the purchased song, app, and/or game may be synchronized with, downloaded to, transferred to, etc., the inmate's approved mobile device, i.e., multifunction wireless device. The communications port may be implemented as a wired port and/or a wireless port using, for example, WiFi, Bluetooth, or NFC protocols.
In an additional embodiment, the kiosk may be used to unlock an inmate's mobile device so it can be used outside the facility upon his/her release. In such embodiments, the user may retain all of the songs, apps, games, books, etc., that he/she has accumulated during incarceration. Further, the multifunction wireless device may be reconfigured to allow access to non-correctional facility networks. For example, when an inmate is in possession of a correctional facility issued smartphone that is configured to connect exclusively with correctional facility networks, upon release, the inmate may unlock his phone at the kiosk. Thereby, the unlocked smartphone may then access any available cellular or Wi-Fi network.
In such embodiments, the inmate may additionally purchase a wireless data/phone plan at the kiosk. The kiosk may further unlock additional functionalities of the multifunction wireless device. For example, in an embodiment where the institution has placed restrictions on time of day and/or duration of device use, the kiosk may unlock such restrictions. Or in an additional embodiment, where the institution has restricted use of the device to a certain area within the facility, the kiosk may unlock such restrictions. In short, any restriction that has been placed on the device may be unlocked and/or removed at the kiosk, so the mobile device may function without institutional any restrictions.
In an embodiment, at the time of unlocking the device, the kiosk may further download additional software onto the mobile device. For example, when an inmate is released on parole, there may be certain restrictions/conditions placed on that inmate's activities such as geographic boundaries, restraining orders, work requirements, curfew, etc. In an embodiment, the downloaded software may keep track of the inmate's whereabouts and/or communications habits and may automatically report information under the parole guidelines and/or requirements.
In an embodiment, when the device is unlocked, the system may store the inmate's preferences, settings, restrictions, and/or data such as games, apps, music, or any other approved content. In the event the inmate returns to the correctional facility, for any reason, the data may be restored to the device associated with the returning inmate.
The physical housing of the preferred embodiment of kiosk 10 shown in
Referring now to
After selecting the appropriate transaction, a “touchscreen data input” 108, 109, 111 requires the entry of all pertinent information to setup the appropriate account. After entry of “touchscreen data input” 109 for an inmate prepaid transaction an “access number obtained from database” 110 obtains an active access number for the customer from a database of prepaid access numbers 126 (shown in
At this point, whether the bills are validated or not, or whether card payment is accepted or not, the transactions all record relevant transaction data for review. Biometric data is gathered at “still picture taken of user” 118, 123 and the biometric data is sent with the complete details of the transaction to a database at “transaction history and photo sent to database” 121, 122. Certain data is then printed for the customer to retain a physical receipt at “receipt data sent to printer” 124.
All transaction information is stored in a memory and/or database, including any action performed by a user, an inmate, and/or a remote officer. In an embodiment, the transaction record further includes at least one of: a voice recording, images of the user, video captured before, during, and/or after the transaction, messages sent or received, conversations held between the user and a remote officer, and any other data captured during the transaction. The transaction records are available to institution officials for investigative purposes. In an embodiment, the system performs keyword scans, translation, file preparation and/or encryption on the stored data. In an embodiment the memory and/or database is local to the kiosk. In an additional embodiment, the memory and/or database is in electronic communication with the kiosk over a network link. In yet an additional embodiment, the database is implemented as a central remote database.
Referring now to
A reporting system 127 represented by “IP based web interface reporting system” 127 allows for access to the customer information database 125 and transactional data stored in the customer information database 125. The reporting system is connected to a “SOAP/XML, interface to billing system” 130 to provide billing information for the telecommunication provider and a “transactional history and audit reporting” 131 to provide audit reports and transactional histories on an automated basis or by query to the reporting system 127. Reporting System 127 is preferably web based to provide a graphical user interface and conventional query tools based on the database structure.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
In an embodiment, the kiosk is placed in a facility accessible to the general public. In such embodiments, the facilities are under the control of a specific jurisdiction. For example, the kiosk may be located in facilities such as a courthouse, a department of motor vehicles, a utilities company, a grocery store, a police station, a correctional facility, or any other similar facility. In further embodiments, the kiosk further includes a payment or dispenser system capable of facilitating a jurisdiction-related payment.
For example, in an embodiment where the kiosk is located at a utilities company facility, a user may gain access to his account by operating the kiosk and entering personal or account identifying information. The kiosk accesses the account information through a network connection and provides account details for the user. The user may then pay a bill related to the account using the kiosk payment system.
In an embodiment where a kiosk is located within a visiting area of a correctional facility, a user may gain access to an account associated with an inmate being held at that facility. Upon accessing the inmate's account, the user/depositor may provide cash or credit card information at the payment system in order to purchase music, apps, books, or to add money to the inmate's account.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The fields are provided in a web based application that allows queries based on the fields to provide customized reports. Such reports can help to provide more efficient customer service, fraud prevention, system audits, and troubleshooting.
It is apparent that an invention with significant advantages has been described and illustrated. Although the present invention is shown in a limited number of forms, it is not limited to just these forms, but is amenable to various changes and modifications without departing from the spirit thereof.
This application is a continuation from U.S. application Ser. No. 15/350,603 filed Nov. 14, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,062,412, which is a continuation-in-part from U.S. application Ser. No. 11/017,504 filed on Dec. 20, 2004, now abandoned, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/572,555, filed on May 19, 2004, by the inventors and of the same title, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3484560 | Jaeger et al. | Dec 1969 | A |
4054756 | Comella et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4069488 | Fiorenza et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4191860 | Weber | Mar 1980 | A |
4677609 | Piereth et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4935956 | Hellwarth et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5319702 | Kitchin et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5469497 | Pierce et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5539812 | Kitchin et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5634126 | Norell | May 1997 | A |
5659165 | Jennings et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5677945 | Mullins et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5761071 | Bernstein | Jun 1998 | A |
5768355 | Salibrici et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778313 | Fougnies | Jul 1998 | A |
5787156 | Katz | Jul 1998 | A |
5802299 | Logan et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5822215 | Hohmann et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5854975 | Fougnies et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6052454 | Kek et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6131810 | Weiss et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6185414 | Brunner | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198915 | McGregor et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6308887 | Korman et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6337903 | Manner | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6381321 | Brown et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6505774 | Fulcher et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6529593 | Nelson | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6570970 | Gruchala et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6581827 | Welton | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6628766 | Hollis | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6639977 | Swope et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6688518 | Valencia | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6788771 | Manto | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6793128 | Huffman | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6819932 | Allison et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6836540 | Falcone et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7006993 | Cheong et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7015945 | Sullivan | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7042992 | Falcone et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7046779 | Hesse | May 2006 | B2 |
7079636 | McNitt et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7106843 | Gainsboro et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7178720 | Strubbe et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7197560 | Caslin et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7246740 | Swift et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7256816 | Profanchik et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7324637 | Brown et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7333798 | Hodge | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7383213 | Walter | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7437144 | Andresen et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7496345 | Rae et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7505406 | Spadaro et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7529357 | Rae et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7551732 | Anders | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7742581 | Hodge et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7742582 | Harper | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7783021 | Hodge | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7881446 | Apple et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7899167 | Rae | Mar 2011 | B1 |
8014800 | Törnkvist | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8204177 | Harper | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8295446 | Apple et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8458732 | Hanna et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8488756 | Hodge et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8489068 | Edwards et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8509390 | Harper | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8529462 | Crucilla | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8577003 | Rae | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8626118 | Smith et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8750486 | Keiser | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8832374 | Schaefers | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8855280 | Passe et al. | Oct 2014 | B1 |
9043813 | Hanna et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9077680 | Harper | Jul 2015 | B2 |
11062412 | Bullard et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
20010034720 | Armes | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010047310 | Russell | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020046057 | Ross | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020061092 | Maropis et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020071537 | Gainsboro | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020103762 | Lopez et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128970 | Ghafoor | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020183040 | Lundstrom et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194096 | Falcone | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030046226 | Iue et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030066876 | Goldman et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030086546 | Falcone et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097332 | Glasinski | May 2003 | A1 |
20030141360 | De Leo | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030168508 | Daellenbach et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174826 | Hesse | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030193961 | Moore et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030198325 | Bayne | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040004118 | Goodfellow | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040022137 | Campbell et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040022380 | Lynam | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040029564 | Hodge | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040058667 | Pienmaki et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040140350 | Valencia | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040177319 | Horn | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050046697 | Van Cleave et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050098621 | de Sylva | May 2005 | A1 |
20050259801 | Bullard et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060031126 | Ma et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060064379 | Doran et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060098796 | Link | May 2006 | A1 |
20060149644 | Salmar et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070055439 | Denker et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070155411 | Morrison | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070263812 | Polozola et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080091944 | von Mueller et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080175362 | Bangor et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080220739 | Muolo et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090042539 | Jiang et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090229950 | Nakamoto | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090311963 | Haverty | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100070414 | Call et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100299761 | Shapiro | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110130118 | Fan et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110213618 | Hodge | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110249081 | Kay et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120016518 | Saario et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120189110 | Bullard et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120254026 | Lotzer et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130179949 | Shapiro | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130215275 | Berini et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140218466 | Bloms et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140273929 | Torgersrud | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140280559 | Torgersrud | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282898 | Torgersrud | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140287715 | Hodge et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150070236 | Walters et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150271777 | Torgersrud et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160007201 | Torgersrud et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160034871 | Vargas et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160191484 | Gongaware | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170061560 | Bullard et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 9811714 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9813993 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 0145380 | Jun 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Automated Coin Toll System (ACTS),” Telephone World, accessed at http://www.phworld.org/payphone/acts.htm, archived by web.archive.org on Feb. 28, 2009. |
“Cisco IAD2400 Series Business-Class Integrated Access Device”, Cisco Systems Datasheet, 2003. |
“Commissary and Telephone Accounts,” Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, Apr. 2009, available at http://web.co.lancaster.pa.us/DocumentCenter/View/332. |
“Criminal Calls: A Review of the Bureau of Prisons' Management of Inmate Telephone Privileges,” USDOJ/OIG Special Report, Chapter 2, Aug. 1999, available at http://www.justice.gov/oig/special/9908/. |
“Criminal Calls: A Review of the Bureau of Prisons' Management of Inmate Telephone Privileges,” USDOJ/OIG Special Report, Table of Contents, Aug. 1999, available at http://www.justice.gov/oig/special/9908/. |
“Customer Owned Coin Operated Telephones (COCOT),” Telephone World, accessed at http://www.phworld.org/payphone/cocot.htm, archived by web.archive.org on Jan. 27, 2009. |
“History and Key Milestones,” Logica, accessed at http://www.logica.com/history+and+key+milestones/350233679, archived by web.archive.org on Dec. 24, 2009. |
“Inmate Phone System: Technology Pushes Ahead,” Virginia Sheriffs' Institute, Jun. 30, 2009, available at https://vasheriffsinstitute.org/2009/06/30/inmatephonesystemtechnologypushesahead/. |
“Invitation for Bids: For Inmate Commissary Services at the Cumberland County Prison,” Cumberland County Prison, Pennsylvania, Pre-bid Conference, Apr. 27, 2010, available at http://www.ccpa.net/DocumentCenter/HomeNiew/6564. |
“SIP and IPLinkTM in the Next Generation Network: An Overview,” Intel, 2001. |
“Survey of Telephone Switching: Chapter 11,” Telephone Tribute, accessed at http://www.telephonetribute.com/switches survey chapter 11 .html, archived by web.archive.org on Jul. 14, 2009. |
“TSPS History,” Privateline.com: Circuits and Systems, available at http://www.privateline.com/circuits/TSPS history.htm, last retrieved Apr. 29, 2015. |
“Voice Over Packet in Next Generation Networks: An Architectural Framework,” Bellcore, Special Report SR-4717, Issue 1, Jan. 1999. |
“Criminal Calls: A Review of the Bureau of Prisons' Management of Inmate Telephone Privileges,” U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General, Aug. 1999. |
“Why Can't You Make a Collect Call to a Cell Phone,” National Public Radio, Jun. 30, 2008, Accessed via http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=92021561 on Apr. 6, 2015. |
1800MumDad.com.au—Explanation, Aug. 29, 2007—Retrieved from the Internet Archive Wayback Machine at https://web.archive.org/web/20070829114354/http://1800mumdad.com.au/main.php?type=charges2; 2 pages. |
1800MumDad.com.au—Summary Standard Form of Agreement, Apr. 26, 2006—Retrieved from the Internet Archive Wayback Machine at https://web.archive.org/web/20060426180115/http://www.1800mumdad.com.au/main.php?type=summarysfoa; 3 pages. |
Aggarwal, et al., “An Environment for Studying Switching System Software Architecture,” IEEE, Global Telecommunications Conference, 1988. |
Ahimovic et al., “Services for Tomorrow's PCS,” IEEE International Conference on Universal Personal Communications, vol. 1, Oct. 12-15, 1993; pp. 222-227. |
Assignment of U.S. Pat. No. 8,190,121 and U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,308. |
Brown, et al., “SMS: The Short Message Service,” Computer, vol. 40, No. 12, 2007. |
BubbleLINK® Software Architecture (Science Dynamics 2003). |
Bur Goode, Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP), Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 90, No. 9, 1495-1517 (Sep. 2002). |
Clifford J. Weinstein, MIT, The Experimental Integrated Switched Network—A System-Level Network Test Facility (IEEE 1983). |
Commander Call Control System, Rev. 1.04 (Science Dynamics 2002). |
Confalone et al., “Calling Card Service—TSPS Hardware, Software, and Signaling Implementation,” The Bell System Technical Journal, Sep. 1982, vol. 61, No. 7; pp. 1675-1714. |
Corbató et al., “Introduction and Overview of the MULTICS System,” Proceedings—Fall Joint Computer Conference, 1965. |
Definition of “code”, Microsoft Computer Dictionary, 5th Edition, Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press, 2002; p. 106. |
Definition of “telephony”, McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms, 6th Edition (McGraw-Hill, 2003). |
Definitions of “code”, “comprise”, “number”, and “including”, The American Heritage College Dictionary, 3rd Edition (Houghton Mifflin Company, 1997); 10 pages. |
Definitions of “Local Area Network (LAN)” and “Wide Area Network (WAN),” Microsoft Computer Dictionary (Microsoft Press 2002), pp. 304 and 561. |
“Bellcore Notes on the Networks,” Bellcore, Special Report SR-2275, Issue 3, Dec. 1997. |
Excerpts from the Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 10/135,878, filed Apr. 29, 2002. |
File History of U.S. Pat. No. 7,899,167, U.S. Appl. No. 10/642,532, filed Aug. 15, 2003. |
File History of U.S. Pat. No. 8,190,121, U.S. Appl. No. 12/103,138, filed Apr. 15, 2008. |
File History of U.S. Pat. No. 8,489,068, U.S. Appl. No. 12/766,159, filed Apr. 23, 2010. |
File History of U.S. Pat. No. 8,577,003, U.S. Appl. No. 13/009,483, filed Jan. 19, 2011. |
File History of U.S. Pat. No. 8,626,118, U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,308, filed Apr. 17, 2012. |
Reexamination Application No. 90/012,802 of U.S. Pat. No. 8,190,121, filed Mar. 1, 2013. (2 Parts). |
Final Office Action directed to U.S. Appl. No. 13/244,333, dated Oct. 19, 2015; 8 pages. |
Garner, et al., “Mobile Terminated SMS Billing—Exploits and Security Analysis,” IEEE International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, 2006. |
IEEE 100: The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standard Terms, Seventh Edition, Standards Information Network, IEEE Press (2000). |
Ismail, et al., “Prepaid and Postpaid VoIP Service Enhancements 1013 and Hybrid Network Performance Measurement,” Information Technology Journal, vol. 5, Issue 2, 2006. |
Jeff Hewett and Lee Dryburgh, Signaling System No. 7 (SS7/C7): Protocol, Architecture, and Services (Networking Technology) at 85 (Cisco Press, Jun. 2005). |
Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement, Exhibit B: Securus' Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evidence Charts, Global Tel*Link Corporation v. Securus Technologies, Inc., No. 3:14-cv-00829-K (N.D. Tex.), Sep. 26, 2014. |
McKitterick et al., “State of the Art Review of Mobile Payment Technology,” Department of Computer Science, Trinity College Dublin, 2003; 22 pages. |
Operator Service System Generic Requirements, OSSGR, TR-TSY-000271, Collect Billing, Rev. 3, Mar. 1988; 50 pages. |
Osifchin, N., “A Telecommunications Buildings/Power Infrastructure in a New Era of Public Networking,” IEEE 2000. |
PacketCableTM 1.0 Architecture Framework Technical Report, PKT-TR-ARCH-V0 1-001201 (Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. 1999). |
Pages from http://www.corp.att.com/history, archived by web.archive.org on Nov. 4, 2013. |
Photocopy of “Bellcore Notes on the Networks (Formerly BOC Notes on the LEC Networks),” Bellcore, Special Report SR-2275, Issue 3, Dec. 1997. |
Product Handbook: Technology the World Calls On, 8th ed. Dec. 1989. |
Prosecution History of International Patent Application No. PCT/US99/09493 by Brown et al. |
Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 09/072,436, filed May 4, 1998. |
Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/045,589, filed Jan. 28, 2005. |
Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/609,397, filed Dec. 12, 2006. |
Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,077, filed Dec. 21, 2010. |
Response to Office Action, filed Jan. 6, 2009, in Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 10/642,532, filed Aug. 15, 2003. |
Rey, R.F., ed., “Engineering and Operations in the Bell System,” 2nd Edition, AT&T Bell Laboratories: Murray Hill, NJ, 1983. |
Schwartz, et al., “How to Build an SMS Service,” O'Reilly Short Cuts, 2007. |
Science Dynamics, Inmate Telephone Control Systems, http://scidyn.com/fraudprev_main.htm (archived by web.archive.org on Jan. 12, 2001). |
Science Dynamics, SciDyn BubbleLINK, http://www.scidyn.com/products/bubble.html (archived by web.archive.org on Jun. 18, 2006). |
Science Dynamics, SciDyn Call Control Solutions: Commander II, http://www.scidyn.com/products/commander2.html (archived by web.archive.org on Jun. 18, 2006). |
Science Dynamics, SciDyn IP Gateways, http://scidyn.com/products/ipgateways.html (archived by web.archive.org on Aug. 15, 2001). |
Science Dynamics, Science Dynamics—IP Telephony, http://www.scidyn.com/iptelephony_maim.htm (archived by web.archive.org on Oct. 12, 2000). |
Silberschatz, et al., Operating System Concepts, Third Edition, Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, Sep. 1991. |
Sundstrom, K., “Voice over IP: An Engineering Analysis,” Master's Thesis, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Manitoba, Sep. 1999. |
Tanenbaum, A., Modern Operating Systems, Third Edition, Peason Prentice Hall: London, 2009. |
The Line Information Database (LIDB) and Wireless Services, Telcordia Technologies White Paper, Dec. 2001; 31 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/607,447, “IP-based telephony system and method,” to Apple, et al., filed Sep. 3, 2004. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/935,634, “Method of Enabling an SMS Text Message to Facilitate Payment on a Cellular Bill for a Billable Call Received on a Cell Phone,” to Martin, et al., filed Aug. 23, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/766,159, “System and Method for Completion of All Calls Using Single Call Funding Options,” to Edwards et al., filed Apr. 23, 2010; 39 pages. |
Valcourt, et al., “Investigating mobile payment: Supporting technologies, methods, and use,” IEEE International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking, and Communications, 2005. |
Wireless Interconnection and Reciprocal Compensation Agreement Between Community Telephone Company and United States Cellular Corporation, Apr. 24, 2006; 29 pages. |
Definition of “circuit switching”, Newton's Telecom Dictionary, 10th Edition, 1996. |
File History of U.S. Appl. No. 14/703,639, filed May 4, 2015. |
Rosenberg, et al., “SIP: Session Initial Protocol,” Network Working Group, Standard Track, 2002. |
“VoIP Adoption Still Growing in Consumer and Business Markets,” accessed at http://www.voicewalker.net/news/voip-adoption-stillgrowing-in-consumer-and-business-markets/, archived by web.archive.org on Jul. 28, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion directed to related International Patent Application No. PCT/US17/61576, dated Feb. 26, 2018; 11 pages. |
Securus Technologies, Inc. Completes Transaction to Acquire JPay Inc. Jul. 2015, PR Newswire Association LLC (Year: 2015). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220005136 A1 | Jan 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60572555 | May 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15350603 | Nov 2016 | US |
Child | 17373056 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11017504 | Dec 2004 | US |
Child | 15350603 | US |