This disclosure relates to a manufacturing method for improving low cycle fatigue life of machined components, such as aircraft components.
Many machined components, such as disks and rotating shafts of gas turbine engines, are made from superalloys, such as nickel. Some nickel superalloys include brittle compound particles, such as carbides or oxides.
Typically, these superalloy components are machined subsequent to a casting or forging process. A cutting tool can damage or crack the carbides and/or oxides during machining, which provides weakened sites at which fatigue cracks may initiate. Fatigue cracks result in reduced low cycle fatigue life that can significantly limit the service life of the component. Superalloy components having carbides and/or oxides that have been low-stress ground exhibit improved low cycle fatigue life. Low-stress grinding is quite time consuming and expensive. Furthermore, low-stress grinding can only be utilized on smooth, readily accessible surfaces and cannot be used on inaccessible features, such as notches, which are typical on most aircraft superalloy components. Accordingly, fatigue cracks may initiate at inaccessible, machined surfaces of superalloy components despite the use of low-stress grinding.
What is needed is improved low cycle fatigue life for superalloy components with brittle compound particles and machined surfaces.
The disclosed method includes manufacturing a component, such as a superalloy aircraft component, by providing a substrate surface having damaged brittle compound particles from machining. The manufacturing method removes the damaged compound particles from the substrate surface without producing significant damaged compound particles. In one example, the damaged compound particles are removed with an abrasive media. For example, at least 0.0006 inch (0.01524 mm) of substrate surface is removed by the abrasive media. The method results in a machined substrate surface free from damaged compound particles.
These and other features of the disclosure can be best understood from the following specification and drawings, the following of which is a brief description.
Tool marks 14 produced by cutting tools during the machining process damage or crack the carbides and/or oxides 16. Example machining processes are lathe turning broaching, reaming, boring and milling. A typical median size of a cracked carbide may be approximately 0.0006-0.0008 inch (0.01524 mm-0.02032 mm). A large cracked carbide may be around 0.001 inch (0.0254 mm). The site of damaged compound particles can provide a location for early initiation of fatigue cracks, resulting in reduced low cycle fatigue life. Post-machining processing is desirable to counter the effects of the damaged compound particles on low cycle fatigue life.
An example manufacturing method 20 is shown in
Parameters such as the speed, shape and size of the media and the duration for which the component is exposed to the media affect the amount of material removed from the substrate surface. The desired parameters can be empirically determined for each application. Removing the damaged compound particles eliminates sites that are susceptible to fatigue cracks, which extends the low cycle fatigue life of the component.
Other material removal processes can be used to improve low cycle fatigue life if, for example, the substrate surface is removed in an amount corresponding to the median damaged intermetallic compound particle size.
Although example embodiments have been disclosed, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of the claims. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine their true scope and content.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4026779 | Shaw | May 1977 | A |
4454740 | Neal et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4512115 | Miller | Apr 1985 | A |
4536932 | Athey | Aug 1985 | A |
4645561 | Rea | Feb 1987 | A |
5492550 | Krishnan et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
6171711 | Draghi et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6194026 | Warnes et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6331217 | Burke et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6571472 | Berry et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6805750 | Ristau et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
7063597 | Prabhu et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
20050263171 | Wu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
06-145783 | May 1994 | JP |
2001 335833 | Dec 2001 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100126635 A1 | May 2010 | US |