The present invention is directed generally to surgical apparatus, systems and methods for use in subjects including humans and animals, and to apparatus, systems and methods of manipulating objects within the body of a subject when performing laparoscopy.
When performing laparoscopic surgery in a body cavity such as the abdomen, the number of surgical instruments which can be manipulated in the abdomen is limited by the number of abdominal ports incised. Accordingly, the number of organs and tissues the surgeon can manipulate simultaneously is limited by the number of instruments in place.
In a standard laparoscopy for endometriosis, for example, a camera is placed through the umbilical port, and two lower quadrant ports are made for use with instruments. In order to access, excise or fulgurate endometriosis deep in the pelvis or behind an ovary, the ovary must be retracted. An instrument is inserted into one port and used for the purpose of grasping and retracting the ovary. It is often difficult to control the ovary with the grasper, often resulting in unwanted and uncontrolled movement of the ovary. With the camera inserted through the umbilical port and the grasper inserted through a second port, there is only one port left available to the surgeon. Since there is only one port available, the process of fulgurating or excising the endometrial implants is thereby made more difficult, because in order to avoid damaging the underlying tissues, the peritoneum must be tented up. The surgeon must tent the peritoneum and fulgurate or excise the endometrial implants with a single instrument, or alternatively, incise one or more additional ports. The addition of operating instruments then will require the surgeon to relinquish control of the grasper since only two instruments can be manipulated at one time.
However, additional ports and instruments are not desirable for many reasons. Every additional port requires an accompanying abdominal incision, which pierces the peritoneum and abdominal muscles, and increases the risk of striking a blood vessel and infection. Furthermore, each incision carries cosmetic implications for the patient, as a visible scar may be formed.
In addition to the problem of adding ports to allow additional instruments into the abdominal cavity, there is a problem of limited workspace within the abdominal cavity. As more instruments are introduced into the abdomen, the area can become congested. With this congestion, instruments may inadvertently block or bump into each other, making the procedure more difficult for the surgeon and increasing the risk for the patient.
For example, in a laparoscopic hysterectomy, it is often difficult to retract the uterus in the beneficial manner possible in an open abdominal hysterectomy. In an open abdominal hysterectomy, a cork screw tool is often placed in the fundus of the uterus and used for upward traction in order to decrease bleeding. The traction on the uterus also makes it easier to access the lateral sides of the uterus and suture and ligate the uterine arteries and cardinal ligaments. To do this laparoscopically, the surgeon must try and place an extra port and use a grasper to retract the uterus—often a very difficult task. Additionally, the extra grasper often causes instrument clutter with the other instruments being used to carry out the dissection.
Furthermore, the surgeon is physically limited to controlling two instruments at a time, i.e., one instrument per hand. If it is elected to use an additional instrument to perform a function such as retraction of an ovary or manipulation of the uterus, the surgeon will encounter the problem of not being able to manipulate all of the instruments simultaneously.
In light of these problems, it would be desirable to have a laparoscopic system whereby a surgeon might retract and manipulate intra-abdominal organs and objects without the necessity of placing extra ports, as well as having the ability to gain better control over organs and perform functions currently not possible laparoscopically. It would also be desirable to have a system whereby a surgeon might manipulate intra-abdominal organs and objects without the added congestion of the abdominal cavity associated with the introduction of additional intra-abdominal instruments.
The present invention is a laparoscopic surgical method and system using magnetic fields such as those produced by magnets and tools responsive to these magnetic fields to allow a surgeon to retract and control intra-abdominal organs and objects without the necessity of having to place additional items in the abdominal cavity.
The system uses various fasteners such as screws, loops, clips, clamps etc., to attach to objects and organs within the body. These fasteners are capable of being influenced or manipulated in three-dimensional space, directly or indirectly, by a magnetic or electromagnetic field, to allow the surgeon to control intra-abdominal organs and objects without placing additional abdominal ports. The fasteners are then detached from the long tool used to place them into the abdomen. Then, an apparatus containing a magnetic field source, such as a magnet or electromagnet, is placed on the outside of the abdomen. The magnetic field produced by this apparatus is used to manipulate the fasteners attached to the objects or organs inside the abdomen, allowing the surgeon to retract or position the object around the abdomen without the use of an intra-abdominal instrument or placing additional ports.
The present invention will be understood and appreciated more fully from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:
The present invention provides laparoscopic surgeons a system and method to allow the surgeon to retract and manipulate intra-abdominal organs and objects without placing extra ports. Furthermore, the present invention allows the surgeon to maintain increased control over his instruments due to increased space in the body cavity.
In a preferred embodiment, the system of the invention performs its functions with three classes of magnaretractor apparatuses working together—the intracorporeal apparatus 1, extracorporeal apparatus 2, and placement apparatus 3. See
The intracorporeal apparatuses are the set of tools that are used to attach to an object or tissue inside a patient's body. They are designed to interact with the placement apparatus to place it in the correct position inside the body, an extracorporeal apparatus to manipulate it from outside the body, and the object or tissue the surgeon wishes to manipulate.
The intracorporeal apparatuses are designed to both physically engage the placement apparatus, and respond to energy from an extracorporeal apparatus. A preferred embodiment accomplishes this by using magnets 120 disposed in one end 104 of the intracorporeal apparatus opposite the fastener end 414. To aid in engaging a placement apparatus, the magnet attracts an end of the placement apparatus containing a material attracted to the magnet. When the end of the placement apparatus is drawn near the end of the intracorporeal apparatus containing the magnet, the two apparatuses are attracted. If there is no impeding material located between the placement and intracorporeal apparatuses, the two apparatuses will contact and stick to each other, end to end. Advantageously, the magnetic end 104 of the intracorporeal apparatus is rounded to align axially with the placement apparatus. This alignment is imperative to allow the surgeon to retract both the placement and intracorporeal apparatuses through the trocar as well as to allow the interfaces of the placement apparatus to correctly engage the mating nodes of the intracorporeal apparatus. To further aid engaging and aligning the intracorporeal apparatus to the placement apparatus, grooves or ridges 108 are placed on the end 104 of the intracorporeal apparatus to match the grooves or ridges 108 placed on the end of the placement apparatus. When the two apparatuses are pulled proximate to each other by their magnetic attraction, the grooves and ridges force the two apparatuses to align with the end of the placement apparatus slightly overlapping the end of the intracorporeal apparatus, and forming a tight connection.
In a similar alternative embodiment shown in
As with all medical devices, sterilization is a key consideration. Typically, sterilization of medical equipment is performed using an autoclave, which amongst other things, heats the equipment to a temperature higher than any germ can withstand to kill any germs present. Unfortunately, some embodiments of the present invention utilize permanent magnets, which when heated near a certain temperature known as the Curie temperature, will permanently lose their magnetism. Therefore, special consideration in design and use must be made to ensure that the tools are both sterile and properly magnetized. The simplest procedure to ensure correct magnetization is to use a new device with a fresh magnet for each surgery. Alternatively, magnets may be employed having Curie temperatures well in excess of sterilization temperatures. Other embodiments of the invention are designed to accommodate reuse.
One such embodiment of the intracorporeal apparatus is shown in
Another embodiment of the intracorporeal apparatus is designed around reusing the entire apparatus. In this embodiment, the body 100 is made of a magnetically inert metal. Like the previous embodiment, the body of the intracorporeal apparatus has a resealable chamber 140 proximate the end 104 to house a permanent magnet. Similarly, in the preferred embodiment, the resealable chamber 140 is formed by a metal 142 cap over a hollows 146 in the body wherein the cap screws or presses into the rim 144 of the hollows 146. After a surgery, the surgical team can remove the magnet 120 from the intracorporeal apparatus, and then sterilize this embodiment of the apparatus in an autoclave. To prepare for a surgery, the surgical team may use either an unused intracorporeal apparatus or an intracorporeal apparatus that has been autoclaved, perfecting preparation for surgery by placing an available magnet into the resealable chamber 140 and resealing the chamber. Using this embodiment and method, because the magnet was removed after surgery, it is never exposed to the destructive heat of an autoclave.
Known methods of sterilization not involving heating may, of course, be conveniently employed to sterilize the apparatus of the invention.
This structure forms the platform for nearly limitless types of attachments and fasteners to be constructed for the surgeon's use. Such conceived attachments include screws, loops, clips, clamps, and the like. A screw may be useful for piercing and driving into a thick or muscular organ, such as a uterus, to gain appropriate traction to operate. The screw embodiment of the intracorporeal apparatus shown in
In a preferred embodiment of the screw intracorporeal apparatus, a matching placement apparatus 3 has an interface such as a rotatable knob 220 on the portion of the placement apparatus that remains outside the patient's body. Twisting the knob 220 manipulates a shaft 230 which connects to a node 240 at the end of the placement apparatus. This node engages a second mating node 250 on the screw intracorporeal apparatus. The second node 250 is in turn mechanically connected to the screw 210 by an axle 260, which is adapted to rotate independently from the body 100. Therefore, twisting the knob 220 on the placement apparatus rotates the screw 210 on the intracorporeal apparatus. The length of the screw 210 may be varied in order to obtain the optimal distance between the body part which it is desired to manipulate and the abdominal wall. Another embodiment includes a non-human powered drive in the placement apparatus to drive the shaft 230 and cause the screw 210 to rotate at a higher power than a human can exert without strain.
Another embodiment of an intracorporeal apparatus, shown in
In a preferred embodiment of the loop intracorporeal apparatus, a matching placement apparatus 3 has an interface such as a lever, button, or trigger 320 on the portion of the body that remains outside the patient's body. This trigger 320 drives a shaft 330 which connects to a node 340 at the first end of the body. This node engages a second mating node 350 on the loop intracorporeal apparatus. This node 350 is in turn mechanically connected to one or both ends of the loop 300 such that as the node 350 moves towards the loop, the loop opens, and as the node moves away from the loop, the loop closes. Therefore, the loop opens and closes in response to the surgeon moving the trigger 320 on the placement apparatus outside the patient's body.
An additional feature is a locking mechanism which maintains the tightened loop when the intracorporeal apparatus is not engaged with a placement apparatus. The mating node 350 on the intracorporeal apparatus is tensioned with a spring 360. This spring pushes the mating node away from the loop, thus holding the loop closed. However, when engaged with a placement apparatus, the surgeon's pressure on the trigger 320 can easily overcome the spring, forcing the loop to open.
Inside the intracorporeal apparatus, the loop 300 is actuated by moving pulleys 310 and stationary pulleys 315. Moving pulleys 310 are mounted on a piston 130. The loop 300 is threaded between moving pulleys 310 and stationary pulleys 315 as shown in
A third embodiment of the intracorporeal apparatus is a clip mechanism. The clip embodiment can be used to attach a surgical clip to an object proximate the end of the clip intracorporeal apparatus while retracting the object, and leaving the clip in place. In a preferred embodiment of the clip intracorporeal apparatus, a matching placement apparatus has an interface such as a lever, button, trigger on the portion of the apparatus that remains outside the patient's body. This trigger drives a shaft which connects to a node at the end of the apparatus. This node engages a second mating node on the clip intracorporeal apparatus. The second node is in turn mechanically connected by a piston 130 such that as the node moves toward the clip, the clip is expelled from the clip intracorporeal apparatus and closes permanently on the object. Therefore, the clip is closed about an object in response to the surgeon moving the trigger on the placement apparatus outside the patient's body.
In an alternative embodiment shown in
A fourth embodiment of the intracorporeal apparatus is a clamp. The clamp embodiment can be used to form a simple attachment to an object whereby the surgeon opens the clamp and closes it around an object, to maintain its position. The clamp can later be opened to release the object.
In a preferred embodiment of the clamp intracorporeal apparatus, shown in
The placement apparatuses are the tools that are used to physically position the intracorporeal apparatuses inside the patient's body and cause them to attach to objects. The preferred embodiment, shown in
The preferred embodiment further comprises a connector 502 disposed on the end of the body that is placed through the trocar into the patient's body. This connector is adapted to engage and disengage any of numerous intracorporeal apparatuses 1. The connector is controlled by an engagement interface near the end of the body that remains outside the body during surgery. This engagement interface can be a button, an electrical connection to an external device or, most preferably, an engagement lever 504 that slides in the direction along the body's length, and is mechanically attached by a shaft 506 to the connector 502 at the far end of the body 500. When the engagement lever 504 is moved closer to the far end, the connector 502 moves with the engagement lever to capture and engage with an intracorporeal apparatus 1. When the lever is moved away from the far end, the connector moves with the lever to disengage and release an intracorporeal apparatus.
The preferred embodiment also comprises another interface near the end of the body that remains outside of the patient's body. This action interface transmits mechanical energy from the surgeon or another source outside the body to an intracorporeal apparatus if engaged to the placement apparatus. The preferred embodiment for the action interface is a lever in the form of a trigger 510 which is spring loaded. The trigger 510 is mechanically connected to a node 514 at the far end of the body 500 by a shaft 512. This node 514 engages with a mating node 50 on an intracorporeal apparatus 1, the intracorporeal apparatus then in turn converts the delivered energy for its uses. The action interface may also be alternatively an electrical connection to an external device.
In order to assist engaging with the preferred embodiment of the intracorporeal apparatus described above, the placement apparatus must have some magnetically responsive material to attract the permanent magnet in the intracorporeal apparatus. The preferred embodiment thus has a mass of magnetically responsive material 525 disposed within the body 500 of the placement apparatus near the end that enters the patient's body. This magnetically responsive material 525 is mechanically connected to the connector 502 and moves toward the end when the engagement interface is moved towards the end. The magnetically responsive material 525 moves away from the end further up the body 500 when the engagement interface is moved away from the end. As a result, when the engagement interface is positioned to engage an intracorporeal apparatus, the magnetically responsive material is most proximate the end of the body, and thus more easily attracted to the magnet in the intracorporeal apparatus. Furthermore, when the engagement interface is positioned to disengage from the intracorporeal apparatus, the magnetically responsive material is pulled away and outside the attractive reach of the intracorporeal apparatus magnet, thus allowing the two apparatuses to separate.
It will be appreciated that any magnetically responsive material may be utilized in accordance with the teaching of the invention. Presently preferred magnetically responsive material includes ferrous or iron-containing material, rare-earth containing materials, and the like. Exemplary magnetic materials are listed in Table 1.
In another embodiment, shown in
In the case of using an electromagnet 540, the system can take advantage of controlled temporary magnetism. To engage an intracorporeal apparatus 1, the electromagnet 540 is turned on, and so attracts the magnetically responsive material 120 in a corresponding intracorporeal apparatus. Similarly, to disengage the intracorporeal apparatus, the electromagnet 540 is turned off. With slight movement from the surgeon, the intracorporeal apparatus will no longer be attracted to the placement apparatus, and the two apparatuses may be separated. To power the electromagnet, a detachable power supply connects to the placement apparatus near the end that remains outside the patient's body. This power supply being external to the placement apparatus allows the placement apparatus to be made smaller. Furthermore, because it is detachable, the surgical team may detach the power supply and sterilize the placement apparatus in an autoclave as they normally would. When sterile, the team may then reattach the power supply for use in a subsequent procedure.
A preferred embodiment also comprises a third interface near the end of the body that remains outside of the patient's body. The interface 550 when activated by the surgeon causes the connector 502 and any object engaged to it to rotate about the axis of the placement apparatus. Utilizing this embodiment, the surgeon's interface 550 may articulate an intracorporeal apparatus 1 attached to the placement apparatus in a fashion similar to the manner in which surgeons currently rotate laparoscopic instruments within a patient's body.
In embodiments of the placement apparatus containing their own permanent magnets, a similar situation arises as seen in the intracorporeal apparatuses above involving sterilization. Typical sterilization in an autoclave may strip the permanent magnets of their magnetism. To prevent this in embodiments with permanent magnets, such as shown in
A third major component of this system is the extracorporeal apparatus. This apparatus may be used to position an intracorporeal apparatus and any object attached to it within the patient's body. Preferred embodiments of this apparatus comprise a body of some shape with an affixed handle and preferably a magnet or other source of magnetic energy. The extracorporeal apparatuses require a magnetic field source that can produce a magnetic field sufficient to manipulate objects fastened to an intracorporeal apparatus.
In the preferred embodiment shown in
For sterilization purposes, the extracorporeal apparatus may be partially wrapped by a disposable or sterilizable cover 620. As with the placement and intracorporeal apparatuses, the use of permanent magnets presents a situation wherein the typical method of sterilization, i.e., use of an autoclave may destroy the magnetic properties of the magnet. After use in surgery, the surgical team may remove this cover from the extracorporeal apparatus, and either discard or sterilize it for later use. In preparation for a subsequent surgery, the team then may simply place a new or sterilized cover on an available extracorporeal apparatus. In order to ensure that the sterile cover does not separate from the extracorporeal apparatus during surgery, it is preferred that the cover comprise a form-fitting boot to frictionally adhere to the body of the extracorporeal apparatus.
An additional method to ensure the extracorporeal apparatus is sterile for a subsequent surgery is to use an extracorporeal apparatus embodiment having a resealable magnet chamber. In this embodiment, the resealable chamber 640 resides in the central area of the apparatus body 600. In the preferred embodiment, the chamber is formed by a cap 642 over a hollows in the body wherein the cap screws or presses into the rim of the hollows. After a surgery, the surgical team can remove the magnet 610 from the extracorporeal apparatus 2, and determine whether to sterilize the apparatus or discard it. If the team chooses to sterilize its used extracorporeal apparatuses, after sterilization, the team may place an available magnet back into the resealable chamber 640 of the now sterile apparatus. The team may also choose to use an unused sterile extracorporeal apparatus, in which case they may place an available magnet into its resealable chamber in preparation for surgery. In either method, the magnet is never exposed to the destructive heat of an autoclave.
In all of the above embodiments including a permanent magnet, there are many choices of magnets available with varying benefits and detriments to each of their respective uses. The magnets of the extracorporeal apparatuses must be strong enough to exert sufficient pulling (or pushing) force to permit manipulation of the desired object within the body cavity from a distance of several centimeters. For example, in performing a hysterectomy on a fibroid uterus, the magnet pulling an attached intracorporeal apparatus must reach through as much as 5 centimeters or even more of the patient's body to cause the uterus to move.
While this situation suggests the use of a larger, more powerful magnet, other considerations require the magnet to be as weak as possible without disrupting function. For instance, it is very likely that the surgeon will place more than one intracorporeal apparatus inside the patient's body. An extremely strong magnet may disadvantageously attract both the intended and an unintended intracorporeal apparatus, as well as any other objects containing magnetically responsive material in the room. Furthermore, such a strong magnet will also be physically larger than necessary to perform the procedure, thereby rendering it too unwieldy to control or anchor. A third consideration is that a very strong magnet will apply a considerable force to an object attracted to it, which may pinch tissue between the object and the magnet, with enough force to cause damage to the patient.
Accordingly, the present invention includes a set of extracorporeal apparatuses with magnets of varying sizes, shapes and materials, or an adjustable electromagnet. The first consideration for a surgical team in choosing which type of magnets to use concerns whether they will reuse the tools, and if so, how they will sterilize them. A surgical team choosing to discard used extracorporeal apparatuses is only limited in its choice by the expense of individual magnets, and therefore needs only consider the magnetic strength required for this particular patient or procedure.
Surgical teams that choose to reuse however must consider the Curie temperature for the magnet they wish to use, and a particular sterilization method. As mentioned above, using an autoclave may destroy a magnet's magnetism. Therefore, the team has three options for reuse. The first option is to choose a magnet with a Curie temperature much higher than their autoclave can generate, such as Samarium-cobalt or Alnico magnets. With this option, the team may simply place the entire apparatus into the autoclave as they would any other equipment. For many purposes, this may be an adequate solution. However, both Samarium-cobalt and Alnico magnets are weaker than Neodymium magnets, and such strength may be necessary for patients with thick adipose tissue or in procedures that require manipulation of deeply situated or heavy objects.
The second option is to choose an extracorporeal apparatus having a removable magnet in a resealable chamber. With this option, the team removes the magnet from the apparatus after use. The apparatus then may be placed in the autoclave as the team typically would to sterilize equipment. After sterilization, the team would then place the magnet back into the apparatus prior to conducting another surgery. There is no limitation to the team placing the magnet in the same apparatus, as the magnet may be placed in any available apparatuses. This option will work well in any situation, however the surgical team must take the necessary precautions.
The final option is to use permanently positioned magnets within the apparatus. After use, the surgical team may place the entire extracorporeal apparatus into the autoclave, without regard to Curie temperatures until sterilization is achieved. Since the magnet embedded in the apparatus may have been demagnetized, before use, the team must place the apparatus into a remagnetizer to return the magnet to its full magnetic capabilities. The team may perform this on-site, or return the apparatus to an appropriate vendor who can perform a remagnetizing service to re-magnetize the magnets. A preferred embodiment of a remagnetizer includes a body which physically mates with the extracorporeal apparatus to hold it in one position during the re-magnetization process. The remagnetizer exposes the magnet within the magnaretractor apparatus to a high-intensity magnetic field, which causes the magnet to retain its original magnetic field. This option may similarly be used to sterilize and re-magnetize intracorporeal and placement apparatuses.
While the size and material of the magnet determines its strength, the shape has an effect on how much the magnetic field “falls off” over distance. For example, a magnet shaped like a long rod may be strong enough to cause an object weighing 1 kilogram from one centimeter away to accelerate towards the magnet. This same magnet can only cause the same acceleration on an object weighing 250 grams from two centimeters away or 40 grams from five centimeters away. In this situation, the strength of the magnetic field is said to fall off with the square of the distance, giving this magnet a deep reach. Although a magnet having a different shape may also be able to cause an object weighing 1 kilogram from one centimeter away to accelerate towards it, however, at two centimeters, it may only have the capacity to cause the same acceleration on an object weighing 125 grams, and from five centimeters the magnet may only cause the same acceleration on an object weighing 8 grams. In this situation, the strength of the magnetic field is said to fall off with the cube of the distance, i.e., a shallower reach. Thus, the surgeon will have the option of choosing an extracorporeal apparatus with a deeper or shallower reach.
During surgery, the surgeon may use special trocars with graduations to measure the thickness of the abdominal walls of the patient's body. With that measurement and the surgeon's knowledge of the approximate weight of the object to be moved, the surgeon may choose the appropriate extracorporeal apparatus having a magnet of the required strength amongst the plurality of available apparatuses.
The extracorporeal apparatus may be fine tuned by disposing the magnet on an articulable joint. In this embodiment, preferably utilizing a cup shape as shown in
Another embodiment shown in
To ease using the extracorporeal apparatus, the surgeon may lubricate the surface 670 touching the patient's body to allow it to move more easily, and anchor the apparatus to the body, the surgical drape, the surgical table, or another fixed object, to prevent the apparatus from moving once in place.
Anchoring the extracorporeal apparatus in a fixed position may also be accomplished by using an air pump. The preferred embodiments shown in
The extracorporeal apparatus may also be anchored to the patient's body by use of a medical adhesive. A semi-permanent adhesive may be either placed directly on the bottom surface 670 of the extracorporeal apparatus 2, or alternatively, the adhesive may be placed around the edge of the extracorporeal apparatus as shown in
In a standard laparoscopy for endometriosis, three ports are opened on the patient's abdomen—the camera is placed through an umbilical port and two lower quadrant ports are used for instrumentation. Often, there is endometriosis deep in the pelvis or behind the ovary. In order to access the endometriosis and excise or fulgurate it, the surgeon must retract the ovary through one port. The peritoneum must be tented up before the endometriosis can be excised or fulgurated in order to prevent damaging the underlying structures.
With the present invention, the surgeon may start by placing the three ports: a camera in the umbilical port, and two operative ports in the lower quadrants. The surgeon then may engage a clamp intracorporeal apparatus to a placement apparatus. Using one of the operative ports, the surgeon may feed the combination through the trocar into the patient's body, and place the clamp on the ovary to be retracted. The surgeon then is able to place an extracorporeal apparatus on the exterior surface of the abdomen. The magnetic field attracts the clamp and the surgeon is able to guide the ovary towards the extracorporeal apparatus. The extracorporeal apparatus may be locked into position using an adhesive on the extracorporeal apparatus rim or an anchor. With the ovary now retracted against the abdominal wall and maintained by the extracorporeal apparatus, the surgeon is able to disengage the clamp intracorporeal apparatus from the placement apparatus and retract the placement apparatus back through the trocar and out of the patient's body. The ovary will now remain retracted against the interior surface of the anterior abdominal wall, well outside of the surgical field, and without the inclusion of a large intra-abdominal instrument. Accordingly, the surgeon will only need two intra-abdominal instruments, and may control all of the instruments in the operative field without assistance. This also beneficially results in less instrument clutter in the operative field.
The present invention can also be very beneficial when performing a laparoscopic hysterectomy. In an open abdominal hysterectomy, a cork screw is often placed in the fundus of the uterus and used for upward traction in order to decrease bleeding. The traction on the uterus also makes it much easier to access the lateral sides of the uterus and suture and ligate the uterine arteries and cardinal ligaments. One of the difficulties in performing a laparoscopic hysterectomy is that there is no way to retract the uterus in a similar fashion. It is often difficult to surgically place an extra port and use a grasper to retract the uterus. The additional grasper often gets in the way of the other intra-abdominal instruments, which are being used to carry out the dissection. Also, the surgeon is physically unable to manipulate more than two instruments at a time. Lastly, a surgeon often experiences difficulty in trying to manipulate the uterus utilizing a grasper.
The present invention, allows the surgeon the ability to retract the uterus in the same fashion as if the surgeon were performing an open abdominal hysterectomy. Initially, the surgeon would engage a screw intracorporeal apparatus with a placement apparatus, and insert the combination through a trocar into the patient's body. The surgeon is then able to position the screw and twist it into the fundus of the uterus. An extracorporeal apparatus may then be placed on the external anterior abdominal wall. The surgeon must choose an extracorporeal apparatus with a magnet strong enough to attract the muscular and massive uterus. The screw intracorporeal apparatus and the attached uterus would then be attracted towards the magnetic field of the extracorporeal apparatus. Accordingly, the extracorporeal apparatus would essentially provide upwards traction on the uterus similar to an open abdominal case. Furthermore, the extracorporeal apparatus could be moved laterally as needed to move the uterus and allow for easy access to the lateral aspects of the uterus and cervix. With the screw intracorporeal apparatus attached to the uterus, the surgeon may disengage and retract the placement apparatus through the trocar and out of the patient's body, thus freeing space within the body for other intra-abdominal instruments.
The present invention can also be used to increase performance when conducting a salpingectomy for a tubal ligation or an ectopic pregnancy. The current procedure is conducted with use of three ports: an umbilical port for a camera, and two within which to operate. The procedure requires a surgical assistant to grasp and hold the tube while the surgeon performs the resection. However the present invention allows the surgeon to perform the procedure without any assistance, and utilizing only two ports: an umbilical port for the camera, and a superpubic operative port. Initially, the surgeon would begin by engaging a clamp intracorporeal apparatus to a placement apparatus, and passing the combination through a trocar into the patient's body. At this point, the surgeon can maneuver the clamp onto the area of the tube that is to be resected. An extracorporeal apparatus placed on the external abdominal wall could then be used to retract and grasp the tube. With the tube retracted, the surgeon may disengage the placement apparatus and retract it through the trocar and out of the patient's body, thereby freeing up space for a different intra-abdominal apparatus. Next, a harmonic scalpel or other such device would be used to resect the desired portion of the tube. Accordingly, the need for an extra port and a surgical assistant is eliminated. Post-completion of the resection, the surgeon may then reinsert the placement apparatus through the trocar into the patient's body, and manipulate the clamp intracorporeal apparatus still attached to the tube. The surgeon is able to then re-engage the placement apparatus with the intracorporeal apparatus, and release the clamp from the tube. Finally, the surgeon may remove the resected tube from the abdominal cavity, retract the combination of the placement apparatus and the clamp through the trocar and seal the ports used in the surgical procedure.
The present invention may also be used to help the surgeon avoid many of the common complications of laparoscopic surgery. A common complication in laparoscopic surgery is ureteral damage. Ureteral damage, if not promptly treated, may result in damage to renal function and possibly loss of the kidney entirely. The present invention prevents damage to a ureter by the insertion of an intracorporeal apparatus such as a toothless clamp or a loop to move a ureter away from the surgical field.
The present invention may also be used in general surgical procedures. For example, laparoscopic bariatric surgery can be made more efficient using this invention. During a laparoscopic bariatric procedure, the surgeon must retract the liver. Presently, this retractor requires the use of an operative port. The present invention allows the surgeon the ability to retract the liver without the use of a trocar-occupying instrument. Accordingly, the surgery could be performed with a reduced number of ports and reduced intra-abdominal congestion.
The present invention may also be used in laparoscopic procedures performed on animals. For example, laparoscopic surgery routinely performed on baboons may be carried out more efficiently by means of the present invention. During diagnostic laparoscopic procedures, it has been discovered that the uterus and ovaries of a baboon are more mobile than those of humans. The present invention enables the surgeon to retract the uterus or ovaries of a baboon without the use of grasping forceps. This is preferable, because the use of grasping forceps has been reported to result in slight round ligament bleeding in some laparoscopic procedures performed on baboons. Laparoscopic surgery is also performed on other animals, including mammals such as dogs, llamas, alpacas, mares, lions and cows. The present invention will enable surgeons to accomplish such operations in a more efficient manner, as in humans.
Numerous additional advantages may be realized by those having ordinary skill in the art, for any situation in which a surgeon has thorough knowledge of regional anatomy and requires moving internal objects or organs so as to gain access to another object or organ in the body.
This application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/966,958, filed Apr. 30, 2018 which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/918,974, filed Oct. 21, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,962,148, which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/074,783, filed Nov. 8, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,386,973, which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/787,998, filed May 26, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,602,981, which is a Continuation-in-Part of International Application PCT/US08/84991, filed Nov. 26, 2008, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 60/996,575, filed Nov. 26, 2007, the contents of each of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2678228 | Gerhardt | Jun 1951 | A |
2863444 | Winsten | Dec 1958 | A |
3146381 | Louis | Aug 1964 | A |
3674014 | Tillander | Jul 1972 | A |
3789285 | Nishizawa | Jan 1974 | A |
3794091 | Ersek et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
4364377 | Smith | Dec 1982 | A |
4380999 | Healy | Apr 1983 | A |
4706668 | Backer et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4756312 | Epley | Jul 1988 | A |
4901405 | Grover et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4915435 | Levine | Apr 1990 | A |
4968136 | Lim et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4971067 | Bolduc et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4976723 | Schad | Dec 1990 | A |
4997436 | Oberlander | Mar 1991 | A |
5002557 | Hasson | Mar 1991 | A |
5154189 | Oberlander | Oct 1992 | A |
5156608 | Troidl et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5156609 | Nakao et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5282806 | Haber et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5300081 | Young et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5304183 | Gourlay et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5304185 | Taylor | Apr 1994 | A |
5307805 | Byrne | May 1994 | A |
5340360 | Stefanchik | Aug 1994 | A |
5397325 | Della Badia et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5411535 | Fujii et al. | May 1995 | A |
5415160 | Ortiz et al. | May 1995 | A |
5417701 | Holmes | May 1995 | A |
5449361 | Preissman | Sep 1995 | A |
5449365 | Green et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5450842 | Tovey | Sep 1995 | A |
5458603 | Futch, Sr. | Oct 1995 | A |
5458693 | Codorniu | Oct 1995 | A |
5465711 | Moll et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5496317 | Goble et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5499986 | Dimarco | Mar 1996 | A |
5529568 | Rayman | Jun 1996 | A |
5538098 | Sparhawk | Jul 1996 | A |
5564864 | Ritter et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5593379 | Rayman | Jan 1997 | A |
5595562 | Grier et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5665100 | Yoon | Sep 1997 | A |
5681260 | Ueda et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5728121 | Bimbo et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733292 | Gustilo et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5749881 | Sackier et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766189 | Matsuno | Jun 1998 | A |
5782748 | Palmer et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5797911 | Sherman et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797939 | Yoon | Aug 1998 | A |
5848969 | Panescu et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5849015 | Haywood et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5888196 | Bonutti | Mar 1999 | A |
5893873 | Rader | Apr 1999 | A |
5933926 | Reiter | Aug 1999 | A |
6015414 | Werp | Jan 2000 | A |
6017358 | Yoon et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6096038 | Michelson | Aug 2000 | A |
6099537 | Sugai | Aug 2000 | A |
6099550 | Yoon | Aug 2000 | A |
6123657 | Ishikawa et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126657 | Posey et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6127757 | Swinbanks | Oct 2000 | A |
6165180 | Cigaina et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173715 | Sinanan et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6212419 | Blume et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216028 | Haynor et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6241671 | Ritter et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6311082 | Creighton, IV et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315709 | Garibaldi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330467 | Creighton, IV et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6358196 | Rayman | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371973 | Tepper | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6398791 | Que et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6399146 | Harris et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6401723 | Garibaldi et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6440133 | Beale et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6458146 | Kramer | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6459924 | Creighton, IV et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6464710 | Foster | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6340365 | Dittrich | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6488615 | Mitchiner et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6523919 | Israelsen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6537196 | Creighton, IV et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6551304 | Whalen et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6594517 | Nevo | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6630879 | Creighton, IV et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6632229 | Yamanouchi | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6641595 | Moran et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6656199 | Lafontaine | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6677752 | Creighton, IV et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6689119 | Di Caprio et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6702804 | Ritter et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6705989 | Cuschieri et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719765 | Bonutti | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6761861 | Schmid et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6786219 | Garibaldi et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6817364 | Garibaldi et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824511 | Bell et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6916314 | Schneider et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7017584 | Garibaldi et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7094245 | Adams et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7169104 | Ueda et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7182089 | Ries | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7182775 | De Guillebon et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7189198 | Harburn et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7264584 | Ritter et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7300400 | Brown | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7311107 | Harel et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7313429 | Creighton, IV et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7314063 | Egli | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7341063 | Garbibaldi et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7344553 | Opolski et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7390298 | Chu | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7416335 | Munger | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7429259 | Cadeddu et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7431726 | Spence et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7566038 | Scott et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7618435 | Opolski | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7686827 | Hushka | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7691103 | Fernandez et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7691731 | Bet et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7693903 | Ghiron et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7708756 | Nobis et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7736356 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7766810 | Ohdaira | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7769427 | Shachar | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7772950 | Tunay | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7774046 | Werp et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7780054 | Wales | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7799050 | Hensley et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7837612 | Gill et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7850591 | Spector | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7942885 | Sixto, Jr. et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7966059 | Creighton, IV et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7967830 | Ayala et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8038612 | Paz | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8043290 | Harrison et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8057472 | Walker et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8060184 | Hastings et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8066715 | Ducharme | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8074657 | Scott et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8082035 | Glukhovsky | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8133254 | Dumbauld et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8136888 | Suzuki | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8137268 | Van Lue | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8157149 | Olson et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8187286 | Jugenheimer et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8197494 | Jaggi et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8226690 | Altarac et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8235272 | Nicholas et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8241322 | Whitman et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8246529 | Riehl et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8252021 | Boulnois et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8267854 | Asada et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8301226 | Csavoy et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8303495 | Ducharme | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8313497 | Walberg et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8316861 | Brewer et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8316862 | Shapiro et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8333695 | Cuschieri | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8343171 | Farritor | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8360972 | Paz | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8364277 | Glukhovsky | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8377044 | Coe et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8382754 | Odom et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8403916 | Prescott | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8480668 | Fernandez et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8491626 | Roy et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8517931 | Minnelli et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8518057 | Walberg | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8556919 | Aquirre et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8579787 | Shapiro et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8585685 | Hagg | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8602981 | Deutch | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8608773 | Tierny et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8623011 | Spivey | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8628529 | Aldridge et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636762 | Whitman et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8637818 | Balakin | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8685043 | Jugenheimer et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8758394 | Zimmerling et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8764769 | Rodriguez Navarro et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8790245 | Rodriguez Fernandez et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8820602 | Walberg | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8827891 | Roberts | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8828024 | Farritor | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8894574 | Ellman | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8926656 | Palermo et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8944997 | Fernandez et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8968332 | Farritor et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8968356 | Mueller | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9011468 | Ketai et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9033957 | Cadeddu et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9044256 | Cadeddu et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9339285 | Rodriguez-Navarro et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9386973 | Deutch | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9561031 | Heinrich et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9627120 | Scott et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9844391 | Rodriguez Fernandez et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9962148 | Deutch | May 2018 | B2 |
9974546 | Rodriguez Fernandez et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10010370 | Rodriguez-Navarro et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10130381 | Rodriguez-Navarro et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10143459 | Heftman | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10335134 | Deutch | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10537348 | Rodriguez-Navarro et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10905511 | Rodriguez-Navarro et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
11020137 | Rodriguez-Navarro | Jun 2021 | B2 |
20010038683 | Ritter et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020100486 | Creighton, IV et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107533 | Solingen | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116043 | Garibaldi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020173805 | Matsuno et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030114731 | Cadeddu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030125752 | Werp et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030181945 | Opolski | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030208185 | Sheffer et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040044295 | Reinert et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040050395 | Ueda et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064153 | Creighton et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040068173 | Viswanathan | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040158972 | Creighton, IV et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172057 | Guillebon et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040176797 | Opolski | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186347 | Shose et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199074 | Ritter et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230100 | Shluzas | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249262 | Werp et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050080440 | Durgin et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085696 | Uchiyama et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050113628 | Creighton, IV et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131390 | Heinrich et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050165449 | Caddedu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050220583 | Lutz | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050250988 | Ewers et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050277975 | Saadat et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060015178 | Moaddeb et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060074448 | Harrison et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079897 | Harrison et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089633 | Bleich et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060116714 | Sepetka et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149135 | Paz | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060152309 | Mintchev | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060228421 | Seeney et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241691 | Wilk | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247522 | Megee | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060276738 | Becker | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293566 | Brown | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070004958 | Ohdaira | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016010 | Creighton, IV et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027458 | Sixto et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043359 | Altarac et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070073102 | Matsuno et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070135678 | Suzuki | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135685 | Cuschieri | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135802 | Suzuki | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135803 | Belson | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156028 | Van Lue et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070191670 | Spector | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070221233 | Kawano et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070255273 | Fernandez et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270629 | Charles | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282311 | Scott et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080081883 | King, II et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097496 | Chang et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080108860 | Bell et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080134474 | Urysov | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080171907 | Long et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080243106 | Coe et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249534 | Gruber et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269779 | Caddedu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080300458 | Kim et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090005636 | Pang et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090004324 | Dominguez et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090043246 | Dominguez | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090054909 | Farritor et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090062722 | Wakeford et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076536 | Rentschler et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090137984 | Minnelli | May 2009 | A1 |
20090187074 | Saadat et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192344 | Bakos et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090026771 | Baskett | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090267717 | Baskett | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090318762 | Segawa et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010306 | Kawano et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030026 | Uchiyama et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100036394 | Mintz et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100036399 | Viola | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100081876 | Linenkugel et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100105984 | Brewer et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100113872 | Asada et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100114126 | Neff | May 2010 | A1 |
20100137845 | Ramstein et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145147 | Pinsky et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100152539 | Ghabrial et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100160739 | Van Lue | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100168523 | Ducharne | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100174234 | Werp et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100193566 | Scheib et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100204727 | Dominguez | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217245 | Prescott | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100237206 | Barker | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256636 | Fernandez et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268254 | Golden | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100298645 | Deutch | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110040152 | Kim et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110054306 | Del Nido et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110087223 | Spivey | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110087224 | Cadeddu et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110087249 | Rodrigues et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110105848 | Sadovsky et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110121050 | Nicholas et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110130787 | Cinquin et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110184440 | Saldinger | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110230726 | Viola | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110276941 | Oi | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110283822 | Caddedu et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110284014 | Cadeddu et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110285488 | Scott et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295067 | Rodriguez Fernandez et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110306840 | Allen et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110313415 | Fernandez et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120016362 | Heinrich et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120035416 | Fernandez et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120053402 | Conlon et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120053406 | Conlon et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120065627 | Ghabrial et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120078292 | Banju | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120008535 | Cadeddu et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120085358 | Cadeddu et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120101488 | Aldridge et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120116148 | Weinberg et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120227748 | Sanders | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120238796 | Conlon | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120330089 | Ritter et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130030462 | Keating et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130066304 | Belson et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130085341 | Nobis et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130090666 | Hess et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130109267 | Schweikardt et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130110128 | Schostek et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130123828 | Culmer et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130158348 | Nobis et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130158523 | Bergs et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130158659 | Bergs et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130158660 | Bergs et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130172672 | Iddan et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130172906 | Olson et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130226226 | Garrison et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130245356 | Fernandez et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130253256 | Griffith et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130253275 | Ransden et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130253550 | Beisel et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130267788 | Duan et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130289579 | Yeung et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130289768 | Yeung et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130303851 | Griffith et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140066695 | Deutch | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140084761 | Scott et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140135616 | Stein et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140187857 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140243586 | Rohaninejad et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140243597 | Weisenburgh, II et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140257370 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276335 | Pate | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276841 | Rodriguez-Navarro et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277104 | Rodriguez-Navarro et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140350574 | Farritor et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140358229 | Bergs et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150012010 | Adler et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150230801 | Rodriguez et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160038135 | Deutch | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160120613 | Cadeddu et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160228138 | Rodriguez-Navarro et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160302811 | Rodriguez-Navarro et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20180153633 | Rodriguez-Navarro et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180271603 | Nir et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180296289 | Rodriguez-Navarro et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180325604 | Atarot et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190133631 | Rodriguez-Navarro et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190350575 | Deutch | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200289140 | Rodriguez-Navarro et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20210290330 | Rodriguez-Navarro et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2748471 | Jul 2010 | CA |
2733465 | Sep 2011 | CA |
2244381 | Jan 1997 | CN |
101090672 | Dec 2007 | CN |
201079412 | Jul 2008 | CN |
201091596 | Jul 2008 | CN |
102355865 | Feb 2012 | CN |
203953720 | Nov 2014 | CN |
102068288 | Apr 2015 | CN |
101534725 | Sep 2019 | CN |
4212430 | Oct 1993 | DE |
19534618 | Mar 1997 | DE |
102005006705 | Aug 2006 | DE |
10-2010-010417 | Sep 2011 | DE |
2366357 | Jan 1945 | EP |
2391277 | Nov 1979 | EP |
1797823 | Jun 2007 | EP |
2 012 697 | Jan 2009 | EP |
1972284 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2 355 699 | Aug 2011 | EP |
2 381 873 | Nov 2011 | EP |
1942810 | Aug 2012 | EP |
2 571 443 | Mar 2013 | EP |
2595548 | May 2013 | EP |
2 842 511 | Mar 2015 | EP |
09-192137 | Jul 1997 | JP |
2004-357816 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005021576 | Jan 2005 | JP |
4320214 | Aug 2009 | JP |
2009-538699 | Nov 2009 | JP |
WO200051500 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO-2005004734 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO-2005032370 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2006071120 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO2007067231 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO-2007130382 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2007130382 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007142977 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO-2007143162 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO-2007143162 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO-2007143170 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO-2007143170 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO2007142977 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2008039237 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO2008085919 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008131128 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO-2009008865 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009019288 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2009070743 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO-2010056716 | May 2010 | WO |
WO-2010056716 | May 2010 | WO |
WO-2010077561 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO-2010083480 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO-2010083480 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2010-089635 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO-2011044468 | Apr 2011 | WO |
WO-2011044468 | Apr 2011 | WO |
WO-2011044471 | Apr 2011 | WO |
WO-2011044471 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011091483 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO-2011146691 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO-2011146691 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO2011146698 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO2011146698 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO-2011146709 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO-2011146709 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2012010910 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO-2012031114 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO-2012031114 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO-2012033925 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO-2012048102 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO-2012048102 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO-2013096470 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO-2014133751 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014159023 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014163872 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2015112645 | Jul 2015 | WO |
WO-2015142953 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2016168380 | Oct 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Dominguez, Guillermo M., “Colecistectomia Con un Trocar Asistida Por Imanes De Neodimio. Reporte de un Caso”, Asociacion Mexicana de Cirugia Edoscopica, A.C., vol. 8, No. 4, Oct.-Dec. 2007, pp. 172-176. |
Wikipedia (2015). “Stainless Steel,” retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stainless-steel, 13 pages. |
Aesculap, “Endoscopic Vascular surgery in the pelvic region,” B/Braun, Aesculap AG & Co.KG, Catalog, 48 pages, 2006, http://web.archive.org/web/20060313094452/http:// www.tmml.com/Catalogue/SellSheets/A19INFO_ENDOSCOPIC_VASCULAR_SURGERY.pdf. |
Australian Patent Examination Report dated May 20, 2013 in AU Application No. 2008329676 (3 pages). |
European Search Report dated May 23, 2013 in EP Application No. 08853840.0 (4 pages). |
Park et al., “Trocar-less instrumentation for laparoscopy magnetic positioning of intra-abdominal camera and retractor,” Annal of Surgery, vol. 245, pp. 379-384 (2007). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2008/084991 dated Apr. 9, 2009 (4 pages). |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,602,981, Case No. IPR2019-01295, dated Jul. 1, 2019. |
Declaration of Raul Fernandez filed with Case No. IPR2019-01295, dated Jul. 1, 2019. |
Cadeddu et al., Transabdominal Magnetic Anchoring System for Trocar-Less Laparoscopic Surgery, J. Urology, vol. 167, No. 4, Supplement, May 25, 2002. |
Park et al., Trocar-less Instrumentation for Laparoscopy, Surgical Technique, vol. 245, No. 3, Mar. 2007. |
Zeltser et al., Single Trocar Laparoscopic Nephrectomy Using Magnetic Anchoring and Guidance System in the Porcine Model, J. Urology, vol. 178, Jul. 2007. |
Scott et al., Completely transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy using magnetically anchored instruments, Surg. Endosc, 2007, 21:2308-2316. |
Duchene et al., Magnetic Position System for Trocarless Laparoscopic Instruments, J. Endourology, vol. 18, No. 7, Sep. 2004. |
Odwin et al., Prove Covers and Disinfectants for Transvaginal Transducers, JDMS, 6:130-135, May/Jun. 1990. |
Milki et al., Vaginal ultrasound probe cover leakage: implications for patient care, Fertility and Sterility, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, vol. 69, No. 3, Mar. 1998. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,386,973, Case No. IPR2019-01294, dated Jul. 1, 2019. |
Declaration of Raul Fernandez filed with Case No. IPR2019-01294, dated Jul. 1, 2019. |
Patent Trial and Appeal Board, IPR2019-01294, U.S. Pat. No. 9,386,973, Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review, Jan. 22, 2020. |
Patent Trial and Appeal Board, IPR2019-01295, U.S. Pat. No. 8,602,981, Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review, Jan. 22, 2020. |
Patent Trial and Appeal Board, IPR2019-01294, Preliminary Guidance in response to Patent Owner's Motion to Amend, Aug. 17, 2020. |
Patent Trial and Appeal Board, IPR2019-01295, U.S. Pat. No. 8,602,981, Preliminary Guidance in response to Patent Owner's Motion to Amend, Aug. 17, 2020. |
Second Declaration of Raul Fernandez filed with Case No. IPR2019-01295, EX1025, dated Jul. 22, 2020. |
Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Response, Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,602,981, Case No. IPR2019-01295, dated Jul. 22, 2020. |
Petitioner's Opposition to Patent Owner's Motion to Amend, Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,602,981, Case No. IPR2019-01295, dated Jul. 22, 2020. |
Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Response, Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,386,373, Case No. IPR2019-01294, dated Jul. 22, 2020. |
Petitioner's Opposition to Patent Owner's Motion to Amend, Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,386,973, Case No. IPR2019-01294, dated Jul. 22, 2020. |
Second Declaration of Raul Fernandez filed with Case No. IPR2019-01294, EX1025, dated Jul. 22, 2020. |
Patent Owner's Response, Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,602,981, Case No. IPR2019-01295, dated Apr. 29, 2020. |
Patent Owner's Response, Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,386,973, Case No. IPR2019-01294, dated Apr. 29, 2020. |
Patent Owner's Revised Contingent Motion to Amend, Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,602,981, Case No. PR2019-01295, dated Sep. 2, 2020. |
Patent Owner's Revised Contingent Motion to Amend, Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,386,973, Case No. IPR2019-01294, dated Sep. 2, 2020. |
Best, S.L. et al. (2010). “Development of magnetic anchoring and guidance systems for minimally invasive surgery,” Indian J. of Urology 26:418-422. |
Best, S.L. et al. (2010). “Solo Surgeon LESS Nephrectomy Facilitated by New Generation Magnetically Anchored and Guided (MAGS) Camera,” World Congress of Endourology, PS38-14, Chicago IL, Sep. 2010. |
Best, S.L. et al. (2010). “MAGS Instrumentation for LESS/NOTES: Lack of Histologic Damage After Prolonged Magnetic Coupling Across the Abdominal Wall,” World Congress of Endourology, PS2-4, Chicago IL, Sep. 2010. |
Best, S.L. et al. (2008). “Maximizing Coupling Strength of Magnetically Anchored NOTES Instruments: How Thick Can We Go?” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 22: S241. |
Cadeddu, J. et al. (2009). “Novel Magnetically Guided Intraabdominal Camera to Facilitate Laparoendoscopic Single Site Surgery: Initial Human Experience,” Surgical Endoscopy 23:1894-1899. |
Dominguez, G. et al. (2009). “Retraction and triangulation with neodymium magnetic forceps for single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy,” Surg. Endosc. 23:1660-1666. |
Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 20, 2016, for EP Application No. 14 778 895.4, filed on Feb. 25, 2014, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 20, 2016, for EP Application No. 09 839 564.3, filed on Oct. 1, 2009, 11 pages. |
Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 27, 2017, for EP Application No. 15 741 055.6, filed on Jan. 21, 2015, 9 pages. |
Extended European Search Report dated Oct. 30, 2018, for EP Application No. 16 780 691.8, filed on Apr. 13, 2016, 6 pages. |
Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 26, 2018, for EP Application No. 16 780 688.4, filed on Sep. 26, 2017, 9 pages. |
Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 22, 2019, for EP Application No. 17 736 483.3, filed on Jan. 6, 2017, 8 pages. |
Fernandez, R. et al. (2012). “Determining a Performance Envelope for Capture of Kidney Stones Functionalized with Superparamagnetic Particles,” Journal of Endourology, 26(9):1227-30. |
Fernandez, R. et al. (2003). “Development of a Transabdominal Anchoring System for Trocar-Less Laparoscopic Surgery,” Advances in Bioengineering—ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, Washington DC, Nov. 2003, BED vol. 55, pp. 157-158. |
Final Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/704,828, filed May 5, 2015, 10 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/337,082, filed Jul. 21, 2014, 9 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,302, filed Mar. 7, 2014, 15 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,302, filed Mar. 7, 2014, 9 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/098,262, filed Apr. 13, 2016, 10 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2019, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/195,898, filed Jun. 28, 2016, 9 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Nov. 25, 2020, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/728,297, filed Oct. 9, 2017, 11 pages. |
International Search Report dated Jul. 30, 2014, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/021537, filed on Mar. 7, 2014, 2 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/IB2009/054307 dated Feb. 8, 2010, 4 pages. |
International Search Report dated May 4, 2015, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/012319, filed on Jan. 21, 2015, 2 pages. |
International Search Report dated Jul. 18, 2014, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/018307, filed on Feb. 25, 2014, 4 pages. |
International Search Report dated Jul. 15, 2016, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/027385, filed on Apr. 13, 2016, 2 pages. |
International Search Report dated Aug. 22, 2016, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/027390, filed on Apr. 13, 2016, 4 pages. |
International Search Report dated Apr. 3, 2017, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2017/012628, filed on Jan. 6, 2017, 2 pages. |
Leong, F. et al. (2016). “Magnetic surgical instruments for robotic abdominal surgery,” IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering 9:66-78. |
Mashaud, L. et al. (2011). “Tissue Compression Analysis for Magnetically Anchored Cautery Dissector During Single Site Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 15:902-907. |
Mashaud, L. et al. (2010). “Tissue Compression Analysis for Magnetically Anchored Cautery Dissector During Single Site Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy,” Gastroenterology, 138:5 (Supplement 1):S-882. |
Mashaud, L. et al. (2010). “Magnetic Cautery Dissector Suitability for Traditional or Single Site Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Human Cadaver Models,” 12th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, p. 246, National Harbor, MD, Apr. 2010. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 25, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,302, filed Mar. 7, 2014, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 21, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/132,185, filed Aug. 17, 2011, 18 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 21, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/337,082, filed Jul. 21, 2014, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 13, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/337,082, filed Jul. 21, 2014, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/704,828, filed May 5, 2015, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 14, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/704,828, filed May 5, 2015, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 24, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/019,370, filed Sep. 5, 2013, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 22, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/019,404, filed Sep. 5, 2013, 6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 22, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,302, filed Mar. 7, 2014, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 3, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/704,828, filed May 5, 2015, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 24, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/098,262, filed Apr. 13, 2016, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/195,898, filed Jun. 28, 2016, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 17, 2019, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/728,297, filed Oct. 9, 2017, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2020, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/728,302, filed Oct. 9, 2017, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2020, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/926,578, filed Mar. 20, 2018, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2020, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/149,576, filed Oct. 2, 2018, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 12, 2021, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/008,976, filed Jun. 14, 2018, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 15, 2021, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/528,878, filed Aug. 1, 2019, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 14, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/019,370, filed Sep. 5, 2013, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 14, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/132,185, filed Aug. 17, 2011, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 14, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/019,404, filed Sep. 5, 2013, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 3, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/337,082, filed Jul. 21, 2014, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 25, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/337,082, filed Jul. 21, 2014, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 22, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,302, filed Mar. 7, 2014, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 19, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/704,828, filed May 5, 2015, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 24, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/098,262, filed Apr. 13, 2016, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 11, 2019, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/195,898, filed Jun. 28, 2016, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 26, 2019, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/195,898, filed Jun. 28, 2016, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 29, 2020, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/728,302, filed Oct. 9, 2017, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 5, 2021, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/926,578, filed Mar. 20, 2018, 9 pages. |
Raman, J. (2009). “Complete Transvaginal NOTES Nephrectomy Using Magnetically Anchored Instrumentation,” Journal of Endourology 23:367-371. |
Rivas, H. et al. (2005). “A Magnetic Positioning System to Drive Trocarless Laparoscopic Instruments,” First International Minimally Invasive Robotic Association (MIRA) Conference on Robotic Surgery, Innsbruck, Austria, Dec. 2005. |
Scott, D. et al. (2008). “Optimizing Magnetically Anchored Camera, Light Source, Graspers, and Cautery Dissector for Transvaginal NOTES Cholecystectomy,” Surgical Endoscopy 22:S244. |
Scott, D. et al. (2008). “Randomized Comparison of Laparoscopic, Flexible Endoscopic, and Wired and Wireless Magnetic NOTES Cameras on Ex-Vivo and In-Vivo Surgical Performance,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 67: AB115. |
Scott, D. et al. (2008). “Transvaginal Single Access “Pure” NOTES Sleeve Gastrectomy Using a Deployable Magnetically Anchored Video Camera,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 67: AB116. |
Scott, D. et al. (2007). “Transgastric, Transcolonic, and Transvaginal Cholecystectomy Using Magnetically Anchored Instruments,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 21: S474. |
Scott, D. et al. (2007). “Completely Transvaginal Cholecystectomy Using Magnetically Anchored Instruments,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 21: S335. |
Scott, D. et al. (2007). “Short-Term Survival Outcomes Following Transvaginal NOTES Cholecystectomy Using Magnetically Anchored Instruments,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 65: AB109. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated Dec. 18, 2020, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/728,302, filed Oct. 9, 2017, 3 pages. |
Swain, C. et al. (2008). “Linear Stapler Formation of Ileo-Rectal, Entero-Enteral and Gastrojejunal Anastomoses During Dual and Single Access “Pure” NOTES Procedures: Methods, Magnets and Stapler Modifications,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 67: AB119. |
Swain, P. et al. (2008). “Wireless Endosurgery for NOTES,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 67: AB104. |
Tan, Y. (2011). “Modeling of Magnetic Tools for Use with Superparamagnetic Particles for Magnetic Stone Extraction,” 26th Engineering & Urology Society Annual Meeting, p. 29, Washington DC, May 14, 2011. |
Tan, Y. (2012). “In Vitro Comparison of Prototype Magnetic Tool with Conventional Nitinol Basket for Ureteroscopic Retrieval of Stone Fragments Rendered Paramagnetic with Iron-Oxide Microparticles,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 187, Issue 4, pp. e857-858. |
Tang, S. (2008). “Live Video Manipulator for Endoscopy and NOTES,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 68:559-564. |
Tillander, H. (1951). “Magnetic guidance of a catheter with articulated steel tip,” Acta Radiologica pp. 62-64. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jul. 30, 2014, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/021537, filed on Mar. 7, 2014, 5 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/IB2009/054307 dated Feb. 8, 2010. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jul. 18, 2014, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/018307, filed on Feb. 25, 2014, 5 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated May 4, 2015, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/012319, filed on Jan. 21, 2015, 5 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jul. 15, 2016, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/027385, filed on Apr. 13, 2016, 11 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Aug. 22, 2016, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/027390, filed on Apr. 13, 2016, 9 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Apr. 3, 2017, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2017/012628, filed on Jan. 6, 2017, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/113,495, filed Nov. 25, 2008, by Fernandez et al. |
Final Office Action dated Sep. 3, 2021, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/149,576, filed Oct. 2, 2018, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 28, 2021, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/528,878, filed Aug. 1, 2019, 8 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2022, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/008,976, filed Jun. 14, 2018, 20 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 15, 2021, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/728,297, filed Oct. 9, 2017, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 14, 2022, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/149,576, filed Oct. 2, 2018, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190269394 A1 | Sep 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60996575 | Nov 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15966958 | Apr 2018 | US |
Child | 16419363 | US | |
Parent | 14918974 | Oct 2015 | US |
Child | 15966958 | US | |
Parent | 14074783 | Nov 2013 | US |
Child | 14918974 | US | |
Parent | 12787998 | May 2010 | US |
Child | 14074783 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2008/084991 | Nov 2008 | US |
Child | 12787998 | US |