Various embodiments are generally directed to a magnetic element capable of at least magnetic reading.
In accordance with various embodiments, a magnetic stack may be configured to have a magnetically free layer with a predetermined magnetization. A side shield lamination can be separated from the magnetic stack on an air bearing surface (ABS) and biased to a bias magnetization that opposes the predetermined magnetization.
As industry demand advances towards higher data bit density and faster data transfer rates in data storage devices. the physical and magnetic size of various data reading and writing components become stressed by process and design variability. The introduction of smaller data access elements, such as non-pinned trilayer magnetically responsive stacks, can reduce shield-to-shield spacing between magnetic shields and provide increased data bit sensitivity, but may be susceptible to magnetic asymmetry with minor process variations. Hence, a magnetic element configured to provide increased data bit resolution while decreasing susceptibility to design and process variability is a continued demand of the industry.
Accordingly, a magnetic stack can be separated from a side shield lamination on an air bearing surface (ABS). The magnetic stack may have a magnetically free layer that has a predetermined magnetization while the side shield lamination can be biased to a bias magnetization that opposes the predetermined magnetization. The presence of the bias magnetization in the side shield lamination in opposite directions from the magnetization of the magnetic stack can maximize cross-track data bit resolution and track density capability as the magnetic width and magnetic asymmetry are minimized.
Although a magnetically responsive magnetic stack can be constructed in a variety of environments, an exemplary data transducing portion 100 of a data storage device is provided in
The transducing head 104 can include one or more transducing elements, such as a magnetic writer and magnetically responsive reader, which operate to program and read data from the storage media 106, respectively. In this way, controlled motion of the actuating assembly 102 causes the transducers to align with tracks (not shown) defined on the storage media surfaces to write, read, and rewrite data.
It should be noted that the term “stack” is an unlimited term within this disclosure that can be one layer, or a lamination of layers, constructed of magnetic and non-magnetic material. Throughout the present application, the term “stack” will he understood to mean a component that is constructed to be magnetically responsive to external data bits in any operational environment. For example, but not in any way limiting, a magnetic stack may be a data read or write configuration that can differentiate between a plurality of data bits.
The free layers 132 and 134 are each contactingly adjacent a non-magnetic spacer layer 138 that acts to provide a measureable magnetoresistive effect between layers 132 and 134. While the spacer 138 can be constructed of any non-magnetic material with a predetermined thickness, a variety of different non-limiting configurations can be used to accommodate varying free layer magnetic interactions and data bit sensing. The coupled lamination of the free layers 132 and 134 to the spacer layer 138 can be characterized as a magnetic stack 140 that is influenced, in some embodiments, by a rear mounted bias magnet 142 that imparts a predetermined magnetic biasing field on the free layers 132 and 134 to set a default magnetization.
The magnetic stack 140 can further be constructed where each of the free layers 132 and 134 are additionally coupled to a respective electrode layer, such as seed layer 144 and cap layer 146 that provide appropriate growth template (seed) or protection (cap) during stack definition process. It is contemplated, however, that the magnetic element 130 is constructed without the electrode layers while in other embodiments the composition, shape, and placement of the electrode layers 144 and 146 are modified, as needed, to provide performance and manufacturing benefits, such as enlarging one or both of the width or length of layers 144 and 146.
While encountering the data bits along a particular data track 136, data bits from adjacent tracks can inadvertently be sensed by the magnetic stack 140. At least one shield layer can therefore be attached to each of the electrode layers 144 and 146 to reduce the magnetic width of the stack 140 and minimize such inadvertent data bit sensing. The shield layers 148 and 150 can be oriented in a variety of formations and compositions, none of which are required or limited, to direct unwanted magnetic flux away from the free layers 132 and 134.
The shielding of the magnetic stack 140 can be supplemented with other shield layers, such as side shields, that may or may not provide bias fields to the magnetic stack 140. The side shields may further combine with shield layers 148 and 150 to allow for improved magnetic sensing of programmed data bits from the preset data tracks 136 by eliminating noise and inadvertent sensing of adjacent bits. The size and number of shielding and biasing layers can influence the magnetization strength needed to reliably operate the magnetic stack 140, particularly in high linear data bit density recordings.
Magnetic stability of the stack 140 can be increased with the elongation of the stack's stripe height 152, as measured along the X axis. Elongated stripe heights can correspond to smaller sensitivity to process variations which can lead to increased magnetic yield. While a number of magnetic shield 148 and 150 configurations can increase linear data bit resolution, the use of side shields positioned laterally from the magnetic stack 140 on the ABS provides an efficient minimization of the magnetic width of the element 130 and increased data track density capability.
While one, or both, side shield laminations 164 can be coupled to the top and bottom shields 176 and 178,
Turning to the isometric view of the magnetic element 160 shown in
Regardless of the source and magnitude of bias magnetization, the configuration of the magnetic stack 162 and side shield lamination 164 layers can impact the magnetic performance of the element 160, such as stray field containment. By substantially aligning the magnetically free layers 166 and 172 of the magnetic stack 162 and side shield laminations 164, coupling effects that can detrimentally decrease cross-track resolution by increasing magnetic width may be controlled. The addition of tuning the magnetically free layers 166 and 172 with substantially matching thicknesses 182 and 184 can combine with the lateral alignment or the layers to decrease magnetic coupling effects while increasing cross-track resolution.
It should be noted that while common thicknesses 180 and 182 are shared by both magnetically free layers 166 of the magnetic stack 162 and the side shield lamination 164, various embodiments are constructed with differing thicknesses for the magnetically free layers 166 of the magnetic stack 162. which are tuned to match the free layers 172 of the side shield laminations. That is, the laterally aligned lower layer 186 of the side shield lamination 164 and magnetic stack 162 can have a first thickness that differs from a second thickness of the laterally aligned upper layer 188.
While the tuned configuration of the magnetic stack 162 and side shield lamination 164 layers can provide greater control of element 160 operation, the relative direction of the side shield bias magnetizations may allow for the reduction of magnetic width and decrease coupling effects between the magnetic stack 164 and side shield laminations 162. The tuning of the bias magnetizations of the side shield lamination 164 layers with magnetization directions that oppose the magnetizations of the magnetic stack 164 can complement the aligned, matching thickness configuration of the magnetic free layers 166 and 172 to reduce magnetic width and increase cross-track resolution, especially in condensed data storage device form factors.
As shown in
The use of bias features 204 is not limited to a particular configuration structurally or materially. For example, the bias features 204 can be a solid high coercivity material, such as an antiferromagnetic material with a high block temperature, or a lamination of soft magnetic materials providing anti ferromagnetic coupling. The position and function of the bias features 204 arc also not limited as
Much like the bias features 204 of
The bias features 204 and 216 are not limited to the shape, orientation, and material configuration shown in
The use of the coupling layers 228 and 230 can allow for fewer bias features 224 to set the default magnetization of the magnetic stack 234 and the side shield laminations 226 through the utilization of the top shield 222 to transmit magnetic flux. The bias features 224 are shown directly attached to the free layers 236 of the magnetic stack 234 as shown in
The configuration of the coupling layer 254 between the free layers 264 of the side shield laminations 256 along with the ability of the top shield 266 to transmit magnetic flux laterally can allow a single bias feature 252 to be sufficient to set the bias magnetizations.
The magnetic element 250 can provide tuned operation through material and configuration selection of the bias features 252 and coupling layers 254 that can accommodate a variety of performance criteria, such as increased data track capacity and decreased magnetic width, catered to reduced form factor, heightened data bit capacity, data storage devices. However, the combination of coupling layer 254 and bias features 252 is not limited to the configuration shown in
Step 284 then designs a side shield lamination to provide bias magnetizations that oppose the default magnetization of a magnetic stack. As generally illustrated in
The magnetic stack may be any number of configurations adapted to read or write data. One such stack embodiment is the trilayer configuration shown in
With the bias features and coupling layers constructed to provide a bias magnetization that opposes a default magnetization of the magnetic stack, step 290 caps the side shield laminations and magnetic stack with a top shield. The top shield can be formed of any material with any size that may or may not be configured to transmit magnetic flux from the bias features to the respective side shield laminations.
Through the routine 280, a high cross-track resolution magnetic element capable of increased data bit density applications can be constructed by setting bias magnetizations in the side shield laminations with bias features, coupling layers, or both. However, the routine 280 is not limited as the various steps can be omitted, changed, and added. For example, the side shield laminations and magnetic stack can be formed concurrently as a single magnetic lamination that is later separated with isolation trenches to physically isolate the respective components.
It can be appreciated that the tuning of the side shields of a magnetic element with a bias magnetization can control stray magnetic fields while resisting coupling effects that can be problematic to reduced form factor data storage devices. The ability to provide the bias magnetization in a variety of bias feature and coupling layer configuration provides increased cross-track resolution and data track capacity while increasing resistance to process and design variability. As such, the present technology allows for the fabrication of a magnetic element capable of operating in larger capacity data storage devices with higher data access accuracy and faster data transfer times.
It is to be understood that even though numerous characteristics and advantages of various embodiments of the present disclosure have been set forth in the foregoing description, together with details of the structure and function of various embodiments, this detailed description is illustrative only, and changes may be made in detail, especially in matters of structure and arrangements of parts within the principles of the present disclosure to the full extent indicated by the broad general meaning of the terms in which the appended claims arc expressed. For example, the particular elements may vary depending on the particular application without departing from the spirit and scope of the present technology.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4740855 | Diepers et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4935832 | Das et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5515221 | Gill et al. | May 1996 | A |
5576914 | Rottmayer et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5818685 | Thayamballi et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6256176 | Mao et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6529353 | Shimazawa | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6597546 | Gill | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6667862 | Zhu | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6700760 | Mao | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6903906 | Morinaga et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6914759 | Chen et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7035062 | Mao et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7093347 | Nowak et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7236333 | Macken | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7295401 | Jayasekara et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7333304 | Gill et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7446979 | Jayasekara | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7446986 | Araki et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7599151 | Hatatani et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7606007 | Gill | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7623324 | Honda et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7876534 | Chou et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7979978 | Han et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8085500 | Yazawa et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8144437 | Miyauchi et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
20020051380 | Kamiguchi et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020081458 | Hasegawa et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020114111 | Zhu | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020135954 | Yoshikawa et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040160700 | Kagami et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050063100 | Kautzky et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050157431 | Hatatani et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050264944 | Fontana et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060044701 | Funayama | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060092582 | Gill et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060230601 | Gill et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060232893 | Gill et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060245117 | Nowak et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20090034132 | Miyauchi et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090034133 | Miyauchi et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090109580 | Ayukawa et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090135529 | Shimazawa et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090166184 | Zhou et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090168241 | Mochizuki et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090180217 | Chou et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090262465 | Hatatani et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090279213 | Wu et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090302403 | Nguyen | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100027167 | Gill et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100039734 | Hara et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110051291 | Miyauchi et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069417 | Kawamori et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110279923 | Miyauchi et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120087045 | Yanagisawa et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120134057 | Song et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002-319112 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2005-203063 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2012-119053 | Jun 2012 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140002930 A1 | Jan 2014 | US |