The present invention relates to a mass analysis apparatus and method.
In order to ensure the flexibility of a resin, the resin may contain, as a plasticizer, phthalate esters (commonly known as phthalates), but the use of four kinds of phthalates will be restricted starting in 2019 under the Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) adopted by the European Union. Hence, phthalates in resin are required to be identified and quantified.
Phthalates, which are volatile, may be analyzed through conventionally known EGA (Evolved Gas Analysis). EGA is used to analyze a gas component, evolved by heating a sample, using any type of analysis apparatus, such as a gas chromatograph or a mass spectrometer.
A mass analysis apparatus is known, and for example, a technique for performing correction calculation in order to measure an isotope ratio has also been disclosed (Patent Document 1).
(Patent Document 1) Japanese Patent No. 4256208
In order to quantify each of DBP, BBP and DEHP, which are regulation targets, from a sample containing phthalates, for example, DBP, BBP, DEHP and DOTP, mass analysis is typically performed because DBP, BBP, DEHP and DOTP have different molecular weights.
However, upon DBP quantification, for example, when a gas component evolved from a sample is ionized in a mass analysis apparatus, fragment ions are generated from BBP, DEHP, and DOTP, aside from DBP, and the mass spectrum peaks thereof may overlap the mass spectrum peak of DBP. In this case, it is difficult to accurately quantify DBP.
Although DBP alone may be quantified by disposing a gas chromatograph upstream of a mass analysis apparatus to thus separate the fragment ions, the overall size of the apparatus increases due to the use of the gas chromatograph, and moreover the measurement time increases.
Accordingly, the present invention has been made keeping in mind the problems encountered in the related art, and the present invention is intended to provide a mass analysis apparatus and method, in which the precision of detection of a first material including a second material such as an impurity may be improved, without the need to enlarge the apparatus, and moreover, the measurement time may be shortened.
Therefore, the present invention provides a mass analysis apparatus for analyzing a sample containing a first material comprising an organic compound and at least one second material comprising an organic compound and having a mass spectrum peak overlapping the mass spectrum peak of the first material, the mass analysis apparatus comprising: a peak correction unit, configured such that, when an intensity ratio (peak B)/(peak A) of peak A, which does not overlap the mass spectrum peak of the first material, and peak B, which overlaps the mass spectrum peak of the first material, among mass spectrum peaks of standard materials for the at least one second material, is a correction coefficient W, an intensity of a net peak D of the mass spectrum of the first material is calculated by subtracting W×(intensity of peak A) from the intensity of peak C of the mass spectrum of the first material in the sample.
In the mass analysis apparatus of the present invention, the intensity of the net peak D of the mass spectrum of the first material may be determined with high precision by subtracting the effect of the second material, the mass spectrum peak of which overlaps that of the first material, based on the intensity of peak A, which does not overlap the mass spectrum peak of the first material among the peaks of the second material.
Here, for example, the apparatus is not enlarged and the measurement time may be reduced, compared to when the effect of the second material is excluded by separating the first material and the second material using a chromatograph.
In the mass analysis apparatus of the present invention, two or more second materials are present, and the peak correction unit may subtract a sum of W×(intensity of peak A) values for the second materials from the intensity of the peak C.
In the mass analysis apparatus of the present invention, even when two or more second materials are present, the effects thereof may be subtracted with high precision.
In the mass analysis apparatus of the present invention, the peak correction unit may calculate the intensity of the peak D when W×(intensity of peak A) exceeds a predetermined threshold value.
In the mass analysis apparatus of the present invention, when the detected peak A is equal to or less than the threshold value, which is set as the estimated intensity of noise, noise is considered to be detected, and the intensity of peak D is not calculated, thereby preventing the inaccurate correction of peak D.
The mass analysis apparatus of the present invention may further comprise an ion source for ionizing the first material and the second material, the peak B being based on fragment ions generated from the second material upon ionization.
When the second material is ionized, it is easy to generate peak B, which overlaps the mass spectrum peak of the first material, and thus the present invention may be more effectively applied.
In addition, the present invention provides a mass analysis method for analyzing a sample containing a first material comprising an organic compound and at least one second material comprising an organic compound and having a mass spectrum peak overlapping the mass spectrum peak of the first material, the mass analysis method comprising: when an intensity ratio (peak B)/(peak A) of peak A, which does not overlap the mass spectrum peak of the first material, and peak B, which overlaps the mass spectrum peak of the first material, among mass spectrum peaks of standard materials for the at least one second material, is a correction coefficient W, calculating an intensity of a net peak D of the mass spectrum of the first material by subtracting W×(intensity of peak A) from the intensity of peak C of the mass spectrum of the first material in the sample.
According to the present invention, the precision of detection of mass analysis of a first material including a second material such as an impurity can be improved, without the need to enlarge the apparatus, and moreover, the measurement time can be reduced.
Hereinafter, a detailed description will be given of embodiments of the present invention with reference to the appended drawings.
The apparatus 200 for analyzing an evolved gas includes a body unit 202, which is a housing, a box-shaped gas-evolving-unit attachment unit 204 attached to the front of the body unit 202, and a computer (control unit) 210 for controlling the entire apparatus. The computer 210 includes a CPU for data processing, a memory unit 218 for storing a computer program or data, a monitor 220, and input units such as a keyboard, etc.
The gas-evolving-unit attachment unit 204 accommodates therein a gas evolving unit 100 configured such that a cylindrical heating furnace 10, a sample holder 20, a cooler 30, a splitter 40 for gas splitting, an ion source 50, and an inert gas channel 19f are assembled together. Also, the body unit 202 accommodates therein a mass spectrometer 110 for analyzing a gas component evolved by heating a sample.
The ion source 50 is referred to as an ┌ ion source┘ in the claims.
As shown in
Also, for example, when the sample holder 20 is moved on a movement rail 204L (which will be described later) by means of a stepping motor, etc. controlled by the computer 210, the sample holder 20 may be automatically moved into or out of the heating furnace 10.
With reference to
The heating furnace 10 is attached to the attachment plate 204a of the gas-evolving-unit attachment unit 204 in the state in which it is parallel to the axis O, and includes a heating chamber 12 having a substantially cylindrical shape, which is open on the axis O, a heating block 14, and a heat retaining jacket 16.
The heating block 14 is disposed on the outer surface of the heating chamber 12, and the heat retaining jacket 16 is disposed on the outer surface of the heating block 14. The heating block 14 is made of aluminum, and is heated through electrical conduction using a pair of heater electrodes 14a (
Also, the attachment plate 204a extends in a direction perpendicular to the axis O, and the splitter 40 and the ion source 50 are attached to the heating furnace 10. Furthermore, the ion source 50 is supported by a support 204b extending in the vertical direction of the gas-evolving-unit attachment unit 204.
The splitter 40 is connected to a position (at the right of
Although the details thereof will be described later, a mixed gas channel 41 communicates with the end of the heating chamber 12 (at the right of
Meanwhile, as shown in
The sample holder 20 includes a stage 22 moving on the movement rail 204L attached to the inner upper surface of the gas-evolving-unit attachment unit 204, a bracket 24c attached onto the stage 22 and extending vertically, heat insulators 24b, 26 attached to the front of the bracket 24c (at the left of
Here, the movement rail 204L extends in the direction of the axis O (the horizontal direction in
Also, the bracket 24c has a long rectangular shape having a semicircular upper portion, and the heat insulator 24b has a substantially cylindrical shape and is attached to the front surface of the upper portion of the bracket 24c (
The bracket 24c has a diameter slightly greater than that of the heating chamber 12 such that the heating chamber 12 is hermetically sealed, and the sample-holding unit 24a is accommodated in the heating chamber 12.
The sample placed on the sample plate 28 in the heating chamber 12 is heated in the heating furnace 10, thus generating the gas component G.
The cooler 30 is disposed to face the bracket 24c of the sample holder 20 and is located outside the heating furnace 10 (to the left of the heating furnace 10 in
When the sample holder 20 moves toward the left of
As shown in
In the present embodiment, a filter 42b for removing impurities from the mixed gas and a flow meter 42c are interposed between the branch channel 42 and the back pressure controller 42a. Also, a pipe, which is not provided with a valve for adjusting back pressure, such as the back pressure controller 42a, and to which the end of the branch channel 42 is exposed, may be an example thereof.
As shown in
The mixed gas channel 41 may be provided in the form of a straight line that reaches the longitudinal end part 41e by extending in the direction of the axis O while communicating with the heating chamber 12, or may be provided in the form of any curved shape or a linear shape having an angle with respect to the axis O depending on the position of the heating chamber 12 or the ion source 50.
As shown in
As shown in
The mixed gas M introduced to the junction 45 near the small hole 53c from the longitudinal end part 41e is mixed with the inert gas T from the inert gas channel 19f to thus form a combined gas M+T, which is then made to flow toward the electric discharge needle 56. Of the combined gas M+T, the gas component G is ionized by the electric discharge needle 56.
The ion source 50 is a known device, and in the present embodiment, an atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI)-type ion source is adopted. APCI does not readily fragment the gas component G and does not generate fragment peaks, and is desirably used because a measurement target may be detected even without separation through chromatography.
The gas component G ionized by the ion source 50 is introduced together with the carrier gas C and the inert gas T into the mass spectrometer 110 and is thus analyzed.
The ion source 50 is accommodated in the ionizer heat retaining unit 54.
A sample S is heated in the heating chamber 12 of a heating furnace 10, thus generating a gas component G. The heating state (heating rate, maximum temperature, etc.) of the heating furnace 10 is controlled by the heating control unit 212 of the computer 210.
The gas component G is mixed with the carrier gas C introduced into the heating chamber 12 to form a mixed gas M, which is then supplied to the splitter 40, and a portion of the mixed gas M is emitted outside from the branch channel 42.
To the ion source 50, the remainder of the mixed gas M and the inert gas T from the inert gas channel 19f are supplied as the combined gas M+T, and the gas component G is ionized therein.
The detection signal determination unit 214 of the computer 210 receives a detection signal from the detector 118 (which will be described later) of the mass spectrometer 110.
The flow rate control unit 216 determines whether the peak intensity of the detection signal received in the detection signal determination unit 214 falls outside of a threshold range. When the peak intensity is determined to fall outside of the threshold range, the flow rate control unit 216 controls the opening ratio of the control valve 19v, whereby the flow rate of the mixed gas M discharged outside from the branch channel 42 in the splitter 40, particularly the flow rate of the mixed gas M introduced to the ion source 50 from the mixed gas channel 41, is adjusted, thus maintaining the maximum precision of detection of the mass spectrometer 110.
The mass spectrometer 110 includes a first aperture 111, through which the gas component G ionized in the ion source 50 is introduced, a second aperture 112, through which the gas component G flows after flowing through the first aperture 111, an ion guide 114, a quadrupole mass filter 116, and a detector 118 for detecting the gas component G discharged from the quadrupole mass filter 116.
The quadrupole mass filter 116 varies an applied high frequency voltage to thus enable mass scanning, and generates a quadrupole electric field and thus detects ions by subjecting the ions to vibratory motion within the quadrupole electric field. The quadrupole mass filter 116 functions as a mass separator that transmits only the gas component G within a certain mass range such that the detector 118 may identify and quantify the gas component.
Also, in the present embodiment, the inert gas T is allowed to flow into the mixed gas channel 41 downstream of the branch channel 42, and thus flow resistance that suppresses the flow rate of the mixed gas M introduced into the mass spectrometer 110 may result, whereby the flow rate of the mixed gas M discharged from the branch channel 42 is adjusted. Specifically, as the flow rate of the inert gas T increases, the flow rate of the mixed gas M discharged from the branch channel 42 also increases.
Thereby, when the gas concentration becomes too high due to the gas component evolved in a large amount, the flow rate of the mixed gas discharged outside from the branch channel is increased, thereby preventing inaccurate measurement due to over-scale of the detection signal that exceeds the detection range of the detection member.
Next, with reference to
As shown in
Meanwhile, DOTP produces fragment ions through cleavage upon ionization in the mass analysis apparatus, and as shown in
In this way, since the peak D overlaps the peak B, when the mass spectrum of the sample containing DBP and DOTP, which are mixed together, is measured, as shown in
Here, in the mass spectrum (of fragment ions) of DOTP, the peak A does not overlap the peak D. The ratio of fragment ions generated through cleavage of DOTP is considered to be maintained constant so long as the ionization conditions of the mass analysis apparatus are fixed. That is, the intensity ratio (peak B)/(peak A) is deemed to be constant.
Accordingly, the intensity ratio (peak B)/(peak A) is determined as the correction coefficient W, and as represented in Equation 1, when W×(intensity of peak A) is subtracted from the intensity of peak C, the intensity of net peak D may be calculated.
(Intensity of peak D)=(intensity of peak C)−W×(intensity of peak A) Equation 1:
Also, in the case where two or more second materials are present in the sample, when the intensity of net peak D is calculated, the sum of W×(intensity of peak A) values for individual second materials is subtracted from the intensity of peak C.
When noise is falsely detected as peak A upon measurement, the correction itself becomes erroneous. Therefore, only in the case where W×(intensity of peak A) exceeds a predetermined threshold value (assuming that the background is noise), the intensity of peak D is corrected.
Equation 2 is the generalization of Equation 1.
In Equation 2, ai or am is the intensity (area) of the peak of the first material or second material, i and m are a natural number of 1 or more, and n is the total number (number of components) of the first material and the second material. In
Wim is the correction coefficient. Also, at i=m, the first material and the second material become identical to each other, and thus Wim=0, which is not included in the correction.
Also, g is the round-down coefficient, and in the present embodiment, g is set to 0.01. Furthermore, g·ai is the threshold value assuming the intensity of noise.
T is the round-down function, and is represented in Equation 3 below.
As shown in
In the present embodiment, Equation 2 is expressed as the following two equations.
a1′=a1−{T(a1×w1,1,g·a1)+T(a2×w1,2,g·a1)}
a2′=a2−{T(a1×w2,1,g·a2)+T(a2×w2,2,q·a2)} [Mathematical Formula 3]
Specifically, Equation 2 treats the first material (DBP) and the second material (DOTP) in a symmetric manner, varying depending on the values of i and m. Specifically, when it is desired to use the second material (DOTP) as the first material, simultaneous quantification of the second material (DOTP) becomes possible based on Equation 2.
Thus, in Equation 2, when the first material and the second material are treated in a symmetric manner, for example, when the intensity ratio of the materials varies depending on the measurement conditions, the first material and the second material, which interact with each other, may be simultaneously measured, making it possible to obtain optimal measurement conditions.
Here, W1,1=W2,2=0, and
the above two equations become as follows.
a1′=a1−{T(a2×W1,2,g×a1)}
a2′=a2−{T(a1×W2,1,g×a2)}
Now, attention is paid only to the former equation related to the first material. In addition, the latter equation is symmetrical with the former equation when the second material is used as a reference.
a1′=a1−{T(a2×W1,2,g×a1)} Equation 4:
Specifically, Equation 4 becomes the following Equation 5.
[Intensity of peak D]=[intensity of peak C]−T([intensity of peak A]×W1,2,g×[intensity of peak C]) Equation 5:
Here, W1,2 is related to the intensity ratio (peak B)/(peak A). Also, for g×(intensity of peak C), at g=0.01, the intensity of peak C is 1%, and this value becomes the threshold value.
Accordingly, based on Equation 3, when T (round-down function) of Equation 5 is {(intensity of peak A)×W1,2}>{threshold value g×(intensity of peak C)}, the value of (intensity of peak A)×W1,2 is regarded as true, not noise, and thus the value of (intensity of peak A)×W1,2 is output. On the other hand, when T is {(intensity of peak A)×W1,2}<{threshold value g×(intensity of peak C)}, peak A is regarded as noise, and 0 is returned, and no correction is carried out.
In Equation 5, when T outputs the value of (intensity of peak A)×W1,2, Equation 6 is obtained, and thus becomes equal to Equation 1.
(Intensity of peak D)=(intensity of peak C)−(intensity of peak A)×W1,2 Equation 6:
Next, with reference to
The correction coefficient Wi,m is stored in the memory unit 218 of a hard disk for each of the first material and the second material. Specifically, for example, an operator specifies a first material and a second material through a keyboard or the like, and sets a sample containing the first material and the second material.
The detection signal determination unit 214 of the computer 210 acquires peaks (peak A and peak C in this example) of the mass spectrum depending on the first material and the second material.
The peak correction unit 217 of the computer 210 reads the correction coefficient Wi,m related to the first material and the second material from the memory unit 218 and also acquires the peak A and the peak C from the detection signal determination unit 214, and the intensity of the net peak D is calculated as described above based on Equations 2 and 3. Equations 2 and 4 are stored in the memory unit 218 using a computer program.
When necessary, the peak correction unit 217 may display the peak D on the monitor 220 through the display control unit 219.
The present invention is not limited to the aforementioned embodiments, and it goes without saying that various modifications and equivalents are included in the spirit and scope of the present invention.
The first material and the second material are not limited to the above embodiments, and a plurality of second materials may be used.
The peak A and the peak B are not limited to one each. For example, when the second material has two peaks A and one peak B, the intensity ratio of any one peak A and peak B may be used as a correction coefficient. In another example, the intensity ratio of an average of two peaks A and peak B may be used as the correction coefficient.
On the other hand, when the second material has one peak A and two peaks B, the intensity ratio of peak A and any one peak B is determined as a first correction coefficient, and is used for the correction of the corresponding peak B. The intensity ratio of peak A and the remaining peak B is determined as a second correction coefficient, and is used for the correction of the corresponding remaining peak B.
The method of introducing the sample into the mass analysis apparatus is not limited to the method of evolving the gas component by thermally decomposing the sample in the heating furnace described above. For example, a solvent-extraction-type GC/MS or LC/MS may be used, in which solvent containing a gas component is introduced and thus the gas component is evolved while volatilizing the solvent.
The ion source 50 is not limited to the APCI type.
Although the preferred embodiments of the present invention have been disclosed for illustrative purposes, those skilled in the art will appreciate that various modifications, additions and substitutions are possible, without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention as disclosed in the accompanying claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2017-142234 | Jul 2017 | JP | national |
The present application for Patent is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/041,679 by SAKUTA et al., entitled “MASS ANALYSIS APPARATUS AND METHOD,” filed Jul. 20, 2018, which claims the benefit of Japanese Patent Application No. JP 2017-142234, filed Jul. 21, 2017, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety into this application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3154747 | Kendall | Oct 1964 | A |
20030042414 | Smith | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20070176088 | Li | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20090321628 | Bateman | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100001180 | Bateman | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100012853 | Parks | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20110210242 | Bateman | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120126110 | Green | May 2012 | A1 |
20130181769 | Noda | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140252218 | Wright | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150340216 | Kwiecien | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20190025123 | Sakuta | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190025174 | Sakuta | Jan 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2001324476 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002005890 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2004361367 | Dec 2004 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200118804 A1 | Apr 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16041679 | Jul 2018 | US |
Child | 16706304 | US |