The invention relates to systems and methods for preparing a sample for analysis, and more specifically to systems and methods for dispensing low volumes of fluid material onto a substrate surface for generating an array of samples for diagnostic analysis.
In recent years, developments in the field of life sciences have proceeded at a breathtaking rate. Universities, hospitals and newly formed companies have made groundbreaking scientific discoveries and advances that promise to reshape the fields of medicine, agriculture, and environmental science. However, the success of these efforts depends, in part, on the development of sophisticated laboratory tools that will automate and expedite the testing and analysis of biological samples. Only upon the development of such tools can the benefits of these recent scientific discoveries be achieved fully.
At the forefront of these efforts to develop better analytical tools is a push to expedite the analysis of complex biochemical structures. This is particularly true for human genomic DNA, which is comprised of at least about one hundred thousand genes located on twenty four chromosomes. Each gene codes for a specific protein, which fulfills a specific biochemical function within a living cell. Changes in a DNA sequence are known as mutations and can result in proteins with altered or in some cases even lost biochemical activities; this in turn can cause a genetic disease. More than 3,000 genetic diseases are currently known. In addition, growing evidence indicates that certain DNA sequences may predispose an individual to any of a number of genetic diseases, such as diabetes, arteriosclerosis, obesity, certain autoimmune diseases and cancer. Accordingly, the analysis of DNA is a difficult but worthy pursuit that promises to yield information fundamental to the treatment of many life threatening diseases.
Unfortunately, the analysis of DNA is made particularly cumbersome due to size and the fact that genomic DNA includes both coding and non-coding sequences (e.g., exons and introns). As such, traditional techniques for analyzing chemical structures, such as the manual pipetting of source material to create samples for analysis, are of little value. To address the scale of the necessary analysis, scientists have developed parallel processing protocols for DNA diagnostics.
For example, scientists have developed robotic devices that eliminate the need for manual pipetting and spotting by providing a robotic arm that carries at its proximal end a pin tool device that consists of a matrix of pin elements. The individual pins of the matrix are spaced apart from each other to allow each pin be dipped within a well of a microtiter plate. The robotic arm dips the pins into the wells of the microtiter plate thereby wetting each of the pin elements with sample material. The robotic arm then moves the pin tool device to a position above a target surface and lowers the pin tool to the surface contacting the pins against the target to form a matrix of spots thereon. Accordingly, the pin tool expedites the production of samples by dispensing sample material in parallel.
Although this pin tool technique works well to expedite the production of sample arrays, it suffers from several drawbacks. First during the spotting operation, the pin tool actually contacts the surface of the substrate. Given that each pin tool requires a fine point in order that a small spot size is printed onto the target, the continuous contact of the pin tool against the target surface will wear and deform the fine and delicate points of the pin tool. This leads to errors which reduce accuracy and productivity.
An alternative technique developed by scientists employs chemical attachment of sample material to the substrate surface. In one particular process, DNA is synthesized in situ on a substrate surface to produce a set of spatially distinct and diverse chemical products. Such techniques are essentially photolithographic in that they combine solid phase chemistry, photolabile protecting groups and photo activated lithography. Although these systems work well to generate arrays of sample material, they are chemically intensive, time consuming, and expensive.
It is further troubling that neither of the above techniques provide sufficient control over the volume of sample material that is dispensed onto the surface of the substrate. Consequently, error can arise from the failure of these techniques to provide sample arrays with well controlled and accurately reproduced sample volumes. In an attempt to circumvent this problem, the preparation process will often dispense generous amounts of reagent materials. Although this can ensure sufficient sample volumes, it is wasteful of sample materials, which are often expensive and of limited availability.
Even after the samples are prepared, scientists still must confront the need for sophisticated diagnostic methods to analyze the prepared samples. To this end, scientists employ several techniques for identifying materials such as DNA. For example, nucleic acid sequences can be identified by hybridization with a probe which is complementary to the sequence to be identified. Typically, the nucleic acid fragment is labeled with a sensitive reporter function that can be radioactive, fluorescent, or chemiluminescent. Although these techniques can work well, they do suffer from certain drawbacks. Radioactive labels can be hazardous and the signals they produce decay over time. Nonisotopic (e.g. fluorescent) labels suffer from a lack of sensitivity and fading of the signal with high intensity lasers are employed during the identification process. In addition, labeling is a laborious and time consuming error prone procedure.
Consequently, the process of preparing and analyzing arrays of a biochemical sample material is complex and error prone.
Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to provide improved systems and methods for preparing arrays of sample material.
It is a further object of the invention to provide systems that allow for the rapid production of sample arrays.
It is yet another object of the invention to provide systems and methods for preparing arrays of sample material that are less expensive to employ and that conserve reagent materials.
It is a further object of the invention to provide systems and methods for preparing arrays of sample material that provide high reproducibility of the arrays generated.
Other objects of the invention will in part be obvious and in part be disclosed in the following.
The invention provides, in one aspect, serial and parallel dispensing tools that can be employed to generate multi-element arrays of sample material on a substrate surface. The substrate surfaces can be flat or geometrically altered to include wells of receiving material. In one embodiment, the invention provides a tool that allows the parallel development of a sample array. To this end, the tool can be understood as an assembly of vesicle elements, or pins, wherein each of the pins can include a narrow interior chamber suitable for holding nanoliter volumes of fluid. Each of the pins can fit inside a housing that itself has in interior chamber. The interior housing can be connected to a pressure source that will control the pressure within the interior housing chamber to regulate the flow of fluid through the interior chamber of the pins. This allows for the controlled dispensing of defined volumes of fluid from the vesicles. In an alternative embodiment, the invention provides a tool that includes a jet assembly that can include a capillary pin having an interior chamber, and a transducer element mounted to the pin and capable of driving fluid through the interior chamber of the pin to eject fluid from the pin. In this way, the tool can dispense a spot of fluid to a substrate surface by spraying the fluid from the pin. Alternatively, the transducer can cause a drop of fluid to extend from the capillary so that fluid can be passed to the substrate by contacting the drop to the surface of the substrate. Further, the tool can form an array of sample material by dispensing sample material in a series of steps, while moving the pin to different locations above the substrate surface to form the sample array. In a further embodiment, the invention then passes the prepared sample arrays to a plate assembly that disposes the sample arrays for analysis by mass spectrometry. To this end, a mass spectrometer is provided that generates a set of spectra signal which can be understood as indicative of the composition of the sample material under analysis.
In one aspect, the invention can be understood as methods for preparing an array of sample material on a surface of a substrate. Some embodiments can include the steps of providing a vesicle having an interior chamber containing a fluid, disposing the vesicle adjacent a first location on the surface of the substrate, controlling the vessel for delivering a nanoliter volume of a fluid at the first location of the surface of the substrate, and moving the vesicle to a set of positions adjacent to the surface substrate whereby fluid is dispensed at each location of the set of positions for forming an array of sample material.
Substrates employed during the processes of the invention can include flat surfaces for receiving the sample material as well as having the surfaces that include wells formed on the surface for defining locations for receiving the fluid that can be ejected from the chambers of the vesicles. The substrates can be silicon, metal, plastic, a membrane, polymeric material, a metal-grafted polymer, as well as a substrate that is functionalized chemically, functionalized with beads, functionalized with dendrite trees of captured material, or any combinations of the above or any similar suitable material for receiving the dispensed fluid.
It is understood that the methods provided herein can dispense both an analyte material well as a support material, such as a matrix material, that aids in the analysis of the analyte. To this end embodiments of the invention can include the steps of depositing a matrix material onto the substance of the substrate. Further the methods can also include a step of waiting a predetermined period of time to allow a solvent of the matrix material to evaporate. Once the solvent of the matrix material has evaporated, embodiments of the invention can include a step of ejecting a volume of analyte fluid into the evaporated matrix material to dissolve with the matrix material and to form a crystalline structure on the substrate surface. It is understood that this step of redissolving the matrix material with the analyte material aids in the analysis of the composition of the material during certain analytical processes, such as mass spectrometry.
In an alternative practice, the methods of the invention can include a step of dispensing a mixture that consists of the analyte material and the matrix material, as well as other material compositions. In this way the matrix and the analyte are delivered to the surface of the substrate as one volume of material. In a further step, the prepared arrays of sample material can be provided to a diagnostic tool for determining information that is representative of the composition of the sample material.
One such diagnostic tool can include a mass spectrometer. The mass spectrometer can be a time of flight mass spectrometer, Fourier transform mass spectrometer or any other suitable type of mass spectrometer that allows the analysis of composition of the sample array.
In one practice of the invention, the step of providing a vesicle having an interior chamber includes the step of providing a vesicle having a piezo electric element for causing fluid to move through the chamber. This method can also include the step of moving the vesicle by rasterizing the vesicle across the surface of the substrate, to form the array of sample material.
In an alternative practice of the invention, parallel processing protocols can be employed wherein the vesicle that is employed during the processing includes a vesicle assembly that has a plurality of vesicles arranged into a matrix for dispensing fluid to a first plurality of locations on the substrate surface. In this way, in a single operation, the method provides for forming a matrix of sample material on the substrate surface. In a further practice of the invention, offset printing can be employed to form a large matrix of sample material by employing multiple printing steps with the vesicle matrix. Other printing techniques can be employed by the present invention without departing from the scope thereof.
In another embodiment of the methods provided herein fluid can be dispensed to the surface of the substrate by contacting the vesicle against the surface of the substrate to spot the surface of the substrate with sample material. Alternatively, the invention provides for another non-contact printing approach wherein the processes of the invention cause a drop of fluid to be formed at the distal tip of the vesicle. It is the drop of fluid that is contacted against the surface of the substrate for delivering sampling material thereto. This provides for the controlled delivery for the known volume of fluid without resulting in the contacting of the vesicle against the surface of the substrate.
In a further practice of the invention, vesicles are provided having an interior chamber that is dimensionally adapted to allow filling of the chamber by capillary action.
In another aspect, the invention can be understood as a method for analyzing a material that comprises the steps of providing a vesicle suitable for carrying a fluid having the material therein, disposing the vesicle adjacent a first location of the surface of the substrate, controlling the vesicle to deliver a nanoliter volume of the fluid to provide a defined and controlled volume of fluid at the first location of the surface of the substrate, moving the vesicle to a second position adjacent a second location on the surface on the substrate to dispense a defined and controlled volume of the material along an array of locations along the substrate surface, and performing mass spectrometry analysis of the material at each location of the array. This method can include the step of mixing a matrix material and an analyte material to form the fluid being delivered to the substrate surface. Alternatively, this practice of the invention can include the steps of filling a chamber contained within the vesicle with a matrix material and dispensing the matrix material to the array of locations. Subsequently, analyte can be dispensed.
The step of performing mass spectrometry can include the step of performing a matrix assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry, as well as time of flight mass spectrometry, or a fourier transform spectrometry. In another aspect, the invention can be understood as an apparatus for forming an array of a sample material on a surface of a substrate. Such apparatus will comprise a vesicle having a distal end suitable for carrying a fluid thereon, a movable arm having a distal portion mounted to the vesicle, a controller for moving the arm to dispose the vesicle adjacent to a first location on the surface on the substrate and for controlling the vesicle to provide a nanoliter volume of the fluid at the first location of the surface of the substrate, and a diagnostic tool for analyzing the material to generate a composition signal that is representative of the chemical composition of the material. In this apparatus the vesicle can comprise a solid shaft of material as well as a vesicle having an interior chamber suitable for carrying fluid as well as a chamber for carrying a fluid in a transducer element for ejecting fluid from that chamber. In another aspect, the invention can be understood as a substrate having a surface for carrying an array of a matrix material and formed according to a process comprising the steps of providing a vesicle suitable for transferring a fluid containing a matrix material, disposing the vesicle adjacent a first location on the surface on the substrate, controlling the vesicle of the volume fluid to the first location of the surface of the substrate, and moving a vesicle to a set of positions adjacent the surface of the substrate and delivering fluid at each of these locations to form an array of matrix material. This substrate itself can be a flat silicon chip as well as any other suitable material, and can be pitted, include wells, and have wells that have rough interior surfaces.
The data processor 12 depicted in
In the embodiment depicted in
The robotic assembly 16 depicted in
The depicted robotic assembly 16 follows from principles well known in the art of electrical engineering and is just one example of a robotic assembly suitable for moving a pin assembly to locations adjacent a substrate and source plate such as the depicted substrate 34. Accordingly, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that alternative robotic systems can be practiced with the invention without departing from the scope thereof.
As further shown in the depicted embodiment, each of the vesicles 62A-62D has an upper flange portion that sits against a seal element 70A-70D to form a fluid-tight seal between the vesicle and the lower block 54 to prevent fluid from passing through the apertures 68A-68D. To keep the seal tight, the depicted pin assembly 50 further includes a set of biasing elements 74A-74D depicted in
As further depicted in
The pin assembly 50 described above and depicted in
The pinblock can be manufactured of stainless steel as this material can be drilled accurately to about ±25 μm, but a variety of probe materials can also be used, such as G10 laminate, PMMA or other suitable material. The pin block can contain any number of apertures and is shown with 16 receptacles which hold the 16 pins in place. To increase the pointing accuracy of each pin, an optional alignment place can be placed below the block so that about 6 mm of the pin tip is left exposed to enable dipping into the wells of a microtiter plate. The layout of the probes in the depicted tool is designed to coordinate with a 384-well microtiter plate, thus the center-to-center spacing of the probes is 4.5 mm. An array of 4×4 probes was chosen since it would produce an array that would fit in less than one square inch, which is the travel range of an xy stage of a MALDI TOF MS employed. The pintool assembly is completed with a stainless steel cover on the top side of the device which is then attached onto the Z-arm of the robot.
With references to
In a first step,
In this practice of the invention, the program operating on data processor 12 can also direct the controller 14 to control the pressure controller 28 to control filling the holding chambers with source material from the source plate 20. The pressure controller 28 can generate a negative pressure within the interior chamber volume 58 of the pin assembly. This will cause fluid to be drawn up into the holding chambers of the vesicles 62A-62D. The pressure controller 28 can regulate the pressure either by open-loop or closed-loop control to avoid having fluid overdrawn through the holding chambers and spilled into the interior chamber volume 58. Loop control systems for controlling pressure are well known in the art and any suitable controller can be employed. Such spillage could cause cross-contamination, particularly if the source material drawn from the source plate 20 varies from well to well.
In an alternative practice of the invention, each of the holding chambers 64A-64D is sufficiently small to allow the chambers to be filled by capillary action. In such a practice, the pin assembly can consist of an array of narrow bore needles, such as stainless steel needles, that extend through the apertures of the lower block 54. The needles that are dipped into source solutions will be filled by capillary action. In one practice, the length of capillary which is to be filled at atmospheric pressure is determined approximately by:
where H equals Height, gamma equals surface tension, P equals solution density, G equals gravitational force and R equals needle radius. Thus the volume of fluid held by each vesicle can be controlled by selecting the dimensions of the interior bore. It is understood that at room temperature water will fill a 15 cm length of 100 μm radius capillary. Thus, a short bore nanoliter volume needle will fill to full capacity, but should not overflow because the capillary force is understood to be too small to form a meniscus at the top of the needle orifice. This prevents cross-contamination due to spillage. In one embodiment, the vesicles of the pin assembly can be provided with different sized interior chambers for holding and dispensing different volumes of fluid.
In an alternative practice, to decrease the volume of liquid that is drawn into the holding chambers of the vesicles, a small positive pressure can be provided within the interior chamber volume 58 by the pressure controller 28. The downward force created by the positive pressure can be used to counter the upward capillary force. In this way, the volume of fluid that is drawn by capillary force into the holding chambers of the vesicles can be controlled.
To this end the data processor 12 can run a computer program that controls and regulates the volume of fluid dispensed. The program can direct the controller 28 to eject a defined volume of fluid, either by generating a spray or by forming a drop that sits at the end of the vesicle, and can be contacted with the substrate surface for dispensing the fluid thereto.
It will be understood that several advantages of the pin assembly depicted in
Alternatively, deposition of sample material onto substrate surface can include techniques that employ pin tool assemblies that have solid pin elements extending from a block where a robotic assembly dips the solid pin elements of the pin assembly into a source of sample material to wet the distal ends of the pins with the sample materials. Subsequently the robotic assembly can move the pin assembly to a location above the surface of the substrate and then lower the pin assembly against the surface of the substrate to contact the individual wetted pins against the surface for spotting material of the substrate surface.
The capillary 112 of the jet assembly 110 can be a glass capillary, a plastic capillary, or any other suitable housing that can carry a fluid sample and that will allow the fluid sample to be ejected by the action of a transducer element, such as the transducer element 114. The transducer element 114 depicted in
In another aspect, the invention provides methods for rapidly analyzing sample materials. To this end sample arrays can be formed on a substrate surface according to any of the techniques discussed above.
The sample arrays are then analyzed by mass spectrometry to collect spectra data that are representative of the composition of the samples in the array. It is understood that the above methods provide processes that allow for rapidly dispensing definite and controlled volumes of analyte material. In particular these processes allow for dispensing sub to low nanoliter volumes of fluid. These low volume deposition techniques generate sample arrays well suited for analysis by mass spectrometry. For example, the low volumes yield reproducibility of spot characteristics, such as evaporation rates and reduced dependence on atmospheric conditions such as ambient temperature and light.
Continuing with the example showing in
Optionally, the pin assembly 38 can be dipped into the same 16 wells of the source plate 20 and spotted on a second target substrate. This cycle can be repeated on as many target substrates as desired. Next the robotic arm 24 can dip the pin assembly 38 in a washing solution, and then dip the pin assembly into 16 different wells of the source plate 20, and spot onto the substrate target offset a distance from the initial set of 16 spots. Again this can be repeated for as many target substrates as desired. The entire cycle can be repeated to make a 2×2 array from each vesicle to produce an 8×8 array of spots (2×2 elements/vesicle×16 vesicles=64 total elements spotted). However, it will be apparent to anyone of ordinary skill in the art that process suitable for forming arrays can be practiced with the present invention without departing from the scope thereof.
In an alternative practice of the invention, oligonucleotides of different sequences or concentrations can be loaded into the wells of up to three different 384-well microtiter source plates; one set of 16 wells can be reserved for matrix solution. The wells of two plates are filled with washing solution. Five microtiter plates can be loaded onto the stage of the robotic assembly 16. A plurality of target substrates can be placed abutting an optional set of banking or registration pins disposed on the stage 26 and provided for aligning the target substrates along a set of reference axes. If the matrix and oligonucleotide are not pre-mixed, the pin assembly can be employed to first spot matrix solution on all desired target substrates. In a subsequent step the oligonucleotide solution can be spotted in the same pattern as the matrix material to re-dissolve the matrix. Alternatively, a sample array can be made by placing the oligonucleotide solution on the wafer first, followed by the matrix solution, or by pre-mixing the matrix and oligonucleotide solutions.
After depositing the sample arrays onto the surface of the substrate, the arrays can be analyzed using any of a variety of means (e.g., spectrometric techniques, such as UV/VIS, IR, fluorescence, chemiluminescence, NMR spectrometry or mass spectrometry). For example, subsequent to either dispensing process, sample loaded substrates can be placed onto a MALDI-TOF source plate and held there with a set of beveled screw mounted polycarbonate supports. In one practice, the plate can be transferred on the end of a probe to be held onto a 1 μm resolution, 1″ travel xy stage (Newport) in the source region of a time-of-flight mass spectrometer. It will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that any suitable mass spectrometry tool can be employed with the present invention without departing from the scope thereof.
Preferred mass spectrometer formats for use in the instant invention include ionization (I) techniques including but not limited to matrix assisted laser desorption (MALDI), continuous or pulsed electrospray (ESI) and related methods (e.g. Ionspray or Thermospray), or massive cluster impact (MCI); those ion sources can be matched with detection formats including linear or non-linear reflectron time-of-flight (TOF), single or multiple quadruple, single or multiple magnetic sector, Fourier Transform ion cyclotron resonance (FTICR), ion trap, and combinations thereof (e.g., ion-trap/time-of-flight). For ionization, numerous matrix/wavelength combinations (MALDI) or solvent combinations (ESI) can be employed. Subattomole levels of protein have been detected for example, using ESI (Valaskovic, G. A. et al., (1996) Science 273: 1199-1202) or MALDI (Li, L. et al., (1996) J. Am. Chem. Soc 118: 1662-1663) mass spectrometry.
Thus, it will be understood that in processes according to the invention a completely non-contact, high-pressure spray or partial-contact, low pressure droplet formation mode can be employed. In the latter, the only contact that will occur is between the droplet and the walls of the well or a hydrophilic flat surface of the substrate 34. However, in neither practice need there be any contact between the needle tip and the surface.
As used herein the following terms and phrases shall have the meanings set forth below:
As used herein, the term “nucleic acid” refers to oligonucleotides or polynucleotides such as deoxyribonucleic acid DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA) as well as analogs of either RNA or DNA, for example made from nucleotide analog, any of which are in single or double stranded form, Nucleic acid molecules can by synthetic or can be isolated from a particular biological sample using any of a number of procedures which are well-known in the art, the particular isolation procedure chosen being appropriate for the particular biological sample. For example, freeze-thaw and alkaline lysis procedures can be useful for obtaining nucleic acid molecules from solid materials; heat and alkaline lysis procedures can be useful for obtaining nucleic acid molecules for urine; and proteinase K extraction can be used to obtain nucleic acid from blood (Rolff, A. et al. PCR: Clinical Diagnostics and Research, Springer (1994)).
The terms “protein”, “polypeptide” and “peptide” are used interchangeably herein when referring to a translated nucleic acid (e.g. a gene product).
“Sample” as used herein, shall refer to a composition containing a material to be detected. In a preferred embodiment, the sample is a “biological sample” (i.e., any material obtained from a living source (e.g. human, animal, plant, bacteria, fungi, protist, virus)). The biological sample can be in any form, including solid materials (e.g. tissue, cell pellets and biopsies) and biological fluids (e.g. urine, blood, saliva, amniotic fluid and mouth wash (containing buccal cells)). Preferably, solid materials are mixed with a fluid.
“Substrate” shall mean an insoluble support onto which a sample is deposited according to the materials of the invention. Examples of appropriate substrates include beads (e.g., silica gel, controlled pore glass, magnetic, Sephadex/Sepharose, cellulose), capillaries, flat supports such as glass fiber filters, glass surfaces, metal surfaces (steel, gold, silver, aluminum, copper and silicon), plastic materials including multiwell plates or membranes (e.g., of polyethylene, polypropylene, polyamide, polyvinylidenedifluoride), pins (e.g., arrays of pins) suitable for combinatorial synthesis or analysis or beads in pits of flat surfaces such as wafers (e.g., silicon wafers) with or without plates.
Robot-driven serial and parallel pL-nL dispensing tools were used to generate 10-103 element DNA arrays on <1″ square chips with flat or geometrically altered (e.g. with wells) surfaces for matrix assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry analysis. In the former, a ‘piezoelectric pipette’ (70 μm id capillary) dispenses single or multiple-0.2 nL droplets of matrix, and then analyte, onto the chip; spectra from as low as 0.2 fmol of a 36-mer DNA have been acquired using this procedure. Despite the fast (<5 sec) evaporation, micro-crystals of 3-hydroxypicolinic acid matrix containing the analyte are routinely produced resulting in higher reproducibility than routinely obtained with larger volume preparations; all of 100 five fmol spots of a 23-mer in 800 μm wells yielded easily interpreted mass spectra, with 99/100 parent ion signals having a signal to noise ratio of >5. In a second approach, probes from 384 well microtiter plate are dispensed 16 at a time into chip wells or onto flat surfaces using an array of spring loaded pins which transfer ˜20 nL to the chip by surface contact; MS analysis of array elements deposited with the parallel method are comparable in terms of sensitivity and resolution to those made with the serial method.
I. Description of the piezoelectric serial dispenser. The experimental system built on a system purchased from Microdrop GmbH, Norderstedt Germany consists of a piezoelectric element driver which sends a pulsed signal to a piezoelectric element bonded to and surrounding a glass capillary which holds the solution to be dispensed; a pressure transducer to load (by negative pressure) or empty (by positive pressure) the capillary; a robotic xyz stage and robot driver to maneuver the capillary for loading, unloading, dispensing, and cleaning, a stroboscope and driver pulsed at the frequency of the piezo element to enable viewing of “suspended” droplet characteristics; separate stages for source and designation plates or sample targets (i.e. Si chip); a camera mounted to the robotic arm to view loading to a designation plate; and a data station which controls the pressure unit, xyz robot, and piezoelectric driver.
II. Description of the parallel dispenser. The robotic pintool consists of 16 probes housed in a probe block and mounted on an X Y, Z robotic stage. The robotic stage was a gantry system which enables the placement of sample trays below the arms of the robot. The gantry unit itself is composed of X and Y arms which move 250 and 400 mm, respectively, guided by brushless linear servo motors with positional feedback provided by linear optical encoders. A lead screw driven Z axis (50 mm vertical travel) is mounted to the xy axis slide of the gantry unit and is controlled by an in-line rotary servo motor with positional feedback by a motor-mounted rotary optical encoder. The work area of the system is equipped with a slide-out tooling plate that holds five microtiter plates (most often, 2 plates of wash solution and 3 plates of sample for a maximum of 1152 different oligonucleotide solutions) and up to ten 20×20 mm wafers. The wafers are placed precisely in the plate against two banking pins and held secure by vacuum. The entire system is enclosed in plexi-glass housing for safety and mounted onto a steel support frame for thermal and vibrational damping. Motion control is accomplished by employing a commercial motion controller which was a 3-axis servo controller and is integrated with a computer; programming code for specific applications is written as needed.
Samples were dispensed with the serial system onto several surfaces which served as targets in the MALDI TOF analysis including [1] a flat stainless steel sample target as supplied for routine use in a Thermo Bioanalysis Vision 2000; [2] the same design stainless steel target with micromachined nanopits; [3] flat silicon (Si) wafers; [4] polished flat Si wafers; [5] Si wafers with rough (3-6 μm features) pits; [6] (a) 12×12 mm or (b) 18×18 mm Si chips with (a) 10×10 or (b) 16×16 arrays of chemically etched wells, each 800×800 μm on a side with depths ranging from 99-400 μm or (b) 120 μm micrometer, pitch (a) 1.0 or (b) 1.125 mm; [7] 15×15 mm Si chips with 28×28 arrays of chemically etched wells, each 450×450 micrometer on a side with depths ranging from 48-300 micrometers, pitch 0.5 mm; [8] flat polycarbonate or other plastics; [9] gold and other metals; [10] membranes; [11] plastic surfaces sputtered with gold or other conducting materials. The dispensed volume is controlled from 10−10 to 10−6 L by adjusting the number of droplets dispensed.
Sample Preparation and Dispensing: Serial Oligonucleotides (0.1-50 ng/microliter of different sequence or concentrations were loaded into wells of a 96 well microtiter plate; the first well was reserved for matrix solution. A pitted chip (target 6a in MALDI targets section) was placed on the stage and aligned manually. Into the (Windows-based) robot control software were entered the coordinates of the first well, the array size (i.e., number of spots in x and y) and spacing between elements, and the number of 0.2 nL drops per array element. The capillary was filled with ˜10 microliters of rinse H2O, automatically moved in view of a strobe light-illuminated camera for checking tip integrity and cleanliness while in continuous pulse mode, and emptied. The capillary was then filled with matrix solution, again checked at the stroboscope, and then used to spot an array onto flat or pitted surfaces. For reproducibilty studies in different MS modes, typically a 10×10 array of 0.2-20 nL droplets were dispensed. The capillary was emptied by application of positive pressure, optionally rinsed with H20, and led to the source oligo plate where ˜5 μL of 0.05-2.0 μM synthetic oligo were drawn. The capillary was then rastered in a series over each of the matrix spots with 0.2-20 nL aqueous solution added to each.
Sample Preparation and Dispensing: Parallel programs were written to control array making by offset printing; to make an array of 64 elements on 10 wafers, for example, the tool was dipped into 16 wells of a 384 well DNA source plate, moved to the target (e.g. Si, plastic, metal), and the sample spotted by surface contact. The tool was then dipped into the same 16 wells and spotted on the second target; this cycle was repeated on all ten wafers. Next the tool was dipped in washing solution, then dipped into 16 different wells of the source plate, and spotted onto the target 2.25 mm offset from the initial set of 16 spots; again this was repeated on all 10 wafers; the entire cycle was repeated to make a 2×2 array from each pin to produce an 8×8 array of spots (2×2 elements/pin×16 pins=64 total elements spotted).
To make arrays for MS analysis, oligonucleotides of different sequences or concentrations were loaded into the wells of up to three different 384-well microtiter plates, one set of 16 wells was reserved for matrix solution. The wells of two plates were filled with washing solution. The five microtiter plates were loaded onto the slide-out tooling plate. Ten wafers were placed abutting the banking pins on the tooling plate, and the vacuum turned on. In cases where matrix and oligonucleotide were not pre-mixed, the pintool was used to spot matrix solution first on all desired array elements of the ten wafers. For this example, a 16×16 array was created, for which the tool spotted each of the ten wafers 16 times, with an offset of 1.125 mm. Next, the oligonucleotide solution was spotted in the same pattern to re-dissolve the matrix. Similarly, an array could be made by placing the oligonucleotide solution on the wafer first, followed by the matrix solution, or by pre-mixing the matrix and oligonucleotide solutions.
Mass spectrometry. Subsequent to either dispensing scheme, loaded chips were held onto a MALDI-TOF source plate with a set of beveled screw-mounted polycarbonated supports. The plate was transferred on the end of a probe to be held onto a 1 μm resolution, 1″ travel xy stage (Newport) in the source region of a time-of-flight mass spectrometer. The instrument, normally operated with 18-26 kV extraction, could be operated in linear or curved field reflectron mode, and in continuous or delayed extraction mode.
I. Serial dispensing with the piezoelectric pipette. While delivery of a saturated 3-HPA solution can result in tip clogging as the solvent at the capillary-air interface evaporates, pre-mixing DNA and matrix sufficiently dilutes the matrix such that it remains in solution while stable sprays which could be maintained until the capillary was emptied; with 1:1 diluted (in H2O) matrix solution, continuous spraying for >10 minutes was possible. Turning off the piezo element so that the capillary sat inactive for >5 minutes, and reactivating the piezo element also did not result in a clogged capillary.
Initial experiments using stainless steel sample targets as provided by Finnigan Vision 2000 MALDI-TOF system run in reflectron mode utilized a pre-mixed solution of the matrix and DNA prior to dispensing onto the sample target. In a single microtiter well, 50 μL of a saturated matrix solution, 25 μL of a 51 μL solution of the 12-mer (ATCG)3, and 25 μL of a 51 μL solution of the 28-mer (ATCG)7 were mixed. A set of 10×10 arrays of 0.6 μL drops was dispensed directly onto a Finnigan Vision 2000 sample target disk; MALDI-TOF mass spectrum was obtained from a single array element which contained 750 attomoles of each of the two oligonucleotides. Interpretable mass spectra have been obtained for DNAs as large as a 53-mer (350 amol loaded, not shown) using this method.
Mass spectra were also obtained from DNAs microdispensed into the wells of a silicon chip.
Consistent with the improved crystallization afforded by the matrix re-dissolving method, mass spectrum acquisition appeared more reproducible than with pre-mixed matrix plus analyte solutions; each of the 100 five fmol spots of the 23-mer yielded interpreted mass spectra (
II. Parallel Dispensing with robotic pintool. Arrays were made with offset printing as described above. The velocity of the X and Y stages are 35 inches/sec, and the velocity of the Z stage is 5.5 inches/sec. It is possible to move the X and Y stages at maximum velocity to decrease the cycle times, however the speed of the Z stage is to be decreased prior to surface contact with the wafer to avoid damaging it. At such axes speeds, the approximate cycle time to spot 16 elements (one tool impression of the same solutions) on all ten wafers is 20 seconds, so to make an array of 256 elements would take ˜5.3 minutes. When placing different oligonucleotide solutions on the array, an additional washing step must be incorporated to clean the pin tip prior to dipping in another solution, thus the cycle time would increase to 25 seconds or 6.7 minutes to make 10 wafers.
Sample delivery by the tool was examined using radio-labeled solutions and the phosphorimager as described previously; it was determined that each pin delivers approximately 1 nL of liquid. The spot-to-spot reproducibility is high. An array of 256 oligonucleotide elements of varying sequence and concentration was made on flat silicon wafers using the pintool, and the wafer was analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS.
It will be understood that the above-described examples and illustrated embodiments are provided for describing the invention set forth herein and are not to be taken as limiting in any way, and the scope of the invention is to understood by the claims.
This patent application is a continuation of allowed U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/764,711, filed on Jun. 18, 2007, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/786,988, filed on Jan. 23, 1997, and is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/364,774, filed on Jul. 30, 1999. The entirety of each of these patent applications is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2797213 | Moore | Jun 1957 | A |
3046120 | Schmidt | Jul 1962 | A |
3148983 | Endermann et al. | Sep 1964 | A |
3184310 | Fritz et al. | May 1965 | A |
3201239 | Neugebauer et al. | Aug 1965 | A |
3402044 | Steinhoff et al. | Sep 1968 | A |
3567453 | Borden | Mar 1971 | A |
3568735 | Lancaster | Mar 1971 | A |
3776700 | Gallant | Dec 1973 | A |
3782197 | Grams | Jan 1974 | A |
3807235 | Lefkovits | Apr 1974 | A |
3999689 | Ciantro et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4458994 | Jain et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4461328 | Kenney | Jul 1984 | A |
4491629 | Koike et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4548245 | Crandell et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4550069 | Pampalone | Oct 1985 | A |
4554839 | Hewett et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4725677 | Koster et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4731335 | Brigati | Mar 1988 | A |
4740692 | Yamamoto et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4779467 | Rainin et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4798706 | Brigati | Jan 1989 | A |
4844298 | Ohoka et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4877745 | Hayes et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4882127 | Rosenthal et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4925629 | Schramm | May 1990 | A |
4931400 | Jitsukawa | Jun 1990 | A |
4948442 | Manns | Aug 1990 | A |
4952518 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5000921 | Hanaway et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5023187 | Koebler et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5045694 | Beavis et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5055271 | Golias et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5077210 | Eigler et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5108703 | Pfost et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5118605 | Urdea | Jun 1992 | A |
5143854 | Pirrung et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5171989 | Williams et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5175209 | Beattie et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5195657 | Wells | Mar 1993 | A |
5210412 | Levis et al. | May 1993 | A |
5221518 | Mills | Jun 1993 | A |
5262128 | Leighton et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5279796 | Parker et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5288644 | Beavis et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5312233 | Tanny et al. | May 1994 | A |
5338688 | Deeg et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5350676 | Oberhardt et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5399501 | Pope et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5439649 | Tseung et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5457041 | Ginaven et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5498545 | Vestal | Mar 1996 | A |
5503980 | Cantor | Apr 1996 | A |
5505916 | Berry, Jr. | Apr 1996 | A |
5506348 | Pieles | Apr 1996 | A |
5512295 | Kornberg et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5514548 | Krebber et al. | May 1996 | A |
5525812 | Bandzuch et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5547835 | Koster | Aug 1996 | A |
5550004 | Honda | Aug 1996 | A |
5558983 | Simpson et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561029 | Fitzgerald et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5567569 | Aviram et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5580434 | Robotti et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5580733 | Levis et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589136 | Northrup et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5599500 | Jones | Feb 1997 | A |
5601982 | Sargent et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5605662 | Heller et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5605798 | Koster et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5607816 | Fitzgerald et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5609907 | Natan | Mar 1997 | A |
5612000 | Lemieux | Mar 1997 | A |
5612002 | Cody et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5614153 | Homberg | Mar 1997 | A |
5622824 | Koster | Apr 1997 | A |
5643800 | Tarantino et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5658802 | Hayes et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5660792 | Koike | Aug 1997 | A |
5663242 | Ghosh et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5670322 | Eggers et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5670381 | Jou et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5677195 | Winkler et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5688642 | Chrisey et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5691141 | Koster | Nov 1997 | A |
5700642 | Monforte et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5716825 | Hancock et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5742049 | Holle et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5743960 | Tisone | Apr 1998 | A |
5746373 | Sanada | May 1998 | A |
5756050 | Ershow et al. | May 1998 | A |
5757392 | Zhang | May 1998 | A |
5770151 | Roach et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5770272 | Biemann et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5770860 | Franzen | Jun 1998 | A |
5777324 | Hillenkamp | Jul 1998 | A |
5807522 | Brown et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812272 | King et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5828063 | Koster et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830655 | Monforte et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5837860 | Anderson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5851765 | Koster | Dec 1998 | A |
5854486 | Dreyfus | Dec 1998 | A |
5864137 | Becker et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5869240 | Patterson | Feb 1999 | A |
5869242 | Kamb | Feb 1999 | A |
5872003 | Koster | Feb 1999 | A |
5872010 | Karger et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5885775 | Haff et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5894063 | Hutchens et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5900481 | Lough et al. | May 1999 | A |
5925520 | Tully et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5927547 | Papen et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928906 | Koster et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5955729 | Nelson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957167 | Feygin | Sep 1999 | A |
5965363 | Monforte et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5969350 | Kerley et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5981185 | Matson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5985356 | Schultz et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6022688 | Jurinke et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6024925 | Little et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6040193 | Winkler et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6043031 | Koster et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6051378 | Monforte et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6074823 | Koster et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6079283 | Papen et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083762 | Papen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6090558 | Butler et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6101946 | Martinsky | Aug 2000 | A |
6103518 | Leighton | Aug 2000 | A |
6104028 | Hunter et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110426 | Shalon et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111251 | Hillenkamp | Aug 2000 | A |
6116297 | Feygin | Sep 2000 | A |
6121048 | Zaffaroni et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6133436 | Koster et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6136269 | Winkler et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146854 | Koster et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6193939 | Kozlowski | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194144 | Koster | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197498 | Koster | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207370 | Little et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6221601 | Koster et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221605 | Koster | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6225061 | Becker et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6225450 | Koster et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235478 | Koster | May 2001 | B1 |
6238871 | Koster | May 2001 | B1 |
6258538 | Koster et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265716 | Hunter et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268131 | Kang et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268144 | Koster | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269846 | Overbeck et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277573 | Koster | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287872 | Schurenberg et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287972 | Ziger et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6300076 | Koster | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6303309 | Jurinke et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309891 | Shalon et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322970 | Little et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6342396 | Perrin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6355487 | Kowallis | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6376044 | Jarrell et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387628 | Little et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6399394 | Dahm et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6419881 | Weinberg et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428955 | Koster et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6485913 | Becker et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6500621 | Koster | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6558902 | Hillenkamp | May 2003 | B1 |
6565813 | Garyantes | May 2003 | B1 |
6566055 | Monforte et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6569385 | Little et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6589485 | Koster | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6602662 | Koster et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6605257 | Nakazawa et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6629626 | Horsman et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6635452 | Monforte et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6670609 | Franzen et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6723569 | Moore et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6835352 | Ito et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6858184 | Pelrine et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6861214 | Rampal et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
7144554 | Gulla et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7232688 | Little et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7256046 | Nebuloni et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7267800 | Takii et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7285422 | Little et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7390672 | Little et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
20010008615 | Little et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010049148 | Wolk et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010049149 | Kennedy et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010055811 | Hillenkamp | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020009394 | Koster et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020018999 | Henriksson et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020040130 | Braun | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020041829 | Kowallis | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020051971 | Stuelpnagel et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020076723 | Virtanen | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020102725 | Zabarovsky et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020109085 | Hillenkamp et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020119578 | Zaffaroni et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020142483 | Yao et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020155587 | Opalsky et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159918 | Tseng et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030003465 | Little et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030017469 | Risinger et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030022225 | Monforte et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033091 | Opalsky et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030036057 | Braun et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030096426 | Little et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030111494 | Lin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030113233 | Nanthakumar | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030113745 | Monforte et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030124735 | Nanthakumar et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030129589 | Koster et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030148528 | Hillenkamp | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030180148 | Weng | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030180749 | Koster et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030190644 | Braun et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030207297 | Koster et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215368 | Ito et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220844 | Manellos et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030224418 | Braun et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030228594 | Koster et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040037748 | Hasan et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040072365 | Rose et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040126895 | Overbeck et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20060024841 | Yao et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20080008874 | Little et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090130745 | Williams et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19617011 | Apr 1996 | DE |
19618032 | May 1996 | DE |
19628178 | Jul 1996 | DE |
19754978 | Dec 1997 | DE |
19731479 | Aug 1998 | DE |
268237 | May 1988 | EP |
339781 | Nov 1989 | EP |
396116 | Nov 1990 | EP |
500506 | Aug 1992 | EP |
543550 | May 1993 | EP |
1262564 | Jan 1994 | EP |
1271609 | Sep 1997 | EP |
1164203 | Nov 1997 | EP |
2017105 | Mar 1979 | GB |
2233654 | Jan 1991 | GB |
2312782 | Nov 1997 | GB |
2332273 | Jun 1999 | GB |
2215399 | Aug 1990 | JP |
A-8-233710 | Sep 1996 | JP |
8290377 | Nov 1996 | JP |
WO 8402579 | Jul 1984 | WO |
WO 8805074 | Jul 1988 | WO |
WO 8909406 | Oct 1989 | WO |
WO 8910786 | Nov 1989 | WO |
WO 8911270 | Nov 1989 | WO |
WO 8912624 | Dec 1989 | WO |
WO 9001564 | Feb 1990 | WO |
WO 9207879 | May 1992 | WO |
WO 9213629 | Aug 1992 | WO |
WO 9309668 | May 1993 | WO |
WO 9314108 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO 9403774 | Feb 1994 | WO |
WO 9411529 | May 1994 | WO |
WO 9411530 | May 1994 | WO |
WO 9411735 | May 1994 | WO |
WO 9416101 | Jul 1994 | WO |
WO 9421822 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO 9427719 | Dec 1994 | WO |
WO 9504524 | Feb 1995 | WO |
WO 9511755 | May 1995 | WO |
WO 9513538 | May 1995 | WO |
WO 9525116 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO 9525175 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO 9530773 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9535505 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 9602836 | Feb 1996 | WO |
WO 9619587 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO 9629431 | Sep 1996 | WO |
WO 9632504 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 9636731 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO 9708306 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO 9716699 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 9733000 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO 9742348 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9743617 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9803257 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO 9805965 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 9812355 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9820019 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9820020 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9820166 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9822541 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9826179 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9834116 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9839481 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9912040 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9936760 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 9957318 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 0008474 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0025923 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0056446 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0060361 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0119518 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0255199 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 03087410 | Oct 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Nicola et al. “Application of the fast-evaporation sample preparation method for improving quantification of angiotensin II by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization”, Rarid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 1995, v. 9, pp. 1164-1171. |
Vorm et al. “Improved Resolution and Very High Sensitivity in MALDI TOF of Matrix Surfaces Made by Fast Evaporation”, Analytical Chemistry, 1994, v. 66, pp. 3281-3287. |
Zhang et al. “Capillary electrophoresis combined with MALDI-MS spectrometry: continuous deposition on a matrix-precoated membrane target”, J. Mass Spectr., 1996, v. 31, No. 9, pp. 1039-1046. |
Broach et al., “High Throughput Screening for Drug Discovery”, Nature, 384(Suppl 7):14-16, 1996. |
Burbaum et al.,“New Technologies for High-Throughput Screening” Curro Opin Chem. Biol. 1:72-78, 1997. |
Fernandes. P.R. “Letter from the Society President”, J Biornol. Screening, 2(1): 1-9, 1997. |
International Preliminary Examination Report, completed Apr. 4, 2003 for International application No. PCT/US01/45123 filed: Oct. 24, 2001 and published as: WO/2002/05519 on: Jul. 18, 2002. |
IUPACE-IUB Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature Symbols for Amino-Acid Derivatives and Peptides Recommendations (1971), J. Biochemistry, (1972) 126, 773-780. |
Janzen et al., High Throughput Screening as a Discovery Tool in the Pharmaceutical Industry, Lab Robotics Automation (LRA), 8:261-265, 1996. |
Office Action Mailed: Apr. 4, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/037,356, filed Oct. 24, 2001, published as US 2002-0142483 on Oct. 3, 2002, now abandoned. |
Office Action Mailed: May 11, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/037,356, filed Oct. 24, 2001, published as US 2002-0142483 on Oct. 3, 2002, now abandoned. |
Office Action Mailed: Jun. 29, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/243,113, filed Oct. 4, 2005 published as US 2006-0024841 on Feb. 2, 2006. |
Office Action Mailed: Jan. 5, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/243,113, filed Oct. 4, 2005 published as US 2006-0024841 on Feb. 2, 2006. |
Office Action Mailed: Sep. 1, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/037,356 filed Oct. 24, 2001, published as US 2002-0142483 on Oct. 3, 2002, now abandoned. |
Office Action Mailed: Oct. 23, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/243,113, filed Oct. 4, 2005 published as US 2006-0024841 on Feb. 2, 2006. |
Weiler et al., “Hybridization Based DNA Screening on Peptide Nucleic Acid (PNA) Oligomer Arrays” Nucleic Acids Research, 25(14):2792-2799 1997. |
Office Action dated Oct. 17, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/625,719, filed Sep. 24, 2012 and published as US 2013-0017128 on Jan. 17, 2013. |
Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/683,214, filed Nov. 21, 2012 and published as US 2013-0079247 on Mar. 28, 2013. |
Office Action dated Feb. 14, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/625,719, filed Sep. 24, 2012 and published as US 2013-0017128 on Jan. 17, 2013. |
Office Action Mailed: Jan. 23, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/243,113, filed Oct. 4, 2005 published as US 2006-0024841 on Feb. 2, 2006. |
Office Action Mailed: Aug. 19, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/243,113, filed Oct. 4, 2005 published as US 2006-0024841 on Feb. 2, 2006. |
Office Action Mailed: Jan. 18, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/243,113, filed Oct. 4, 2005 published as US 2006-0024841 on Feb. 2, 2006. |
Office Action Mailed: Jul. 8, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/243,113, filed Oct. 4, 2005 published as US 2006-0024841 on Feb. 2, 2006. |
Office Action Mailed: Jun. 26, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/243,113, filed Oct. 4, 2005 published as US 2006-0024841 on Feb. 2, 2006. |
Arshady, Reza. Beaded polymer supports and gels: I. Manufacturing techniques, Journal of Chromatography, 586:181-197 (1991). |
Arshady. Reza, Beaded polymer supports and gels: II. Physico-chemical criteria and functionalization, Journal of Chromatography, 586:199-219 (1991). |
Asseline et al. “New Solid-Phase for Automated Synthesis of Oligonucleotides Containing an Amino-Alkyl Linker at Their 3'-End,” Tetrahedron Letters 31(1: 81-84 (1990). |
Batista-Viera et al., A new method for reversible immobilization of thiol biomolecules based on solid-phase bound thiolsulfonate groups, App. Biochem and Biotech, 31: 175-195 (1991). |
Beattie et al., “Synthesis and use of oligonucleotide libraries,” Chemical Abstracts 123: 1172 (1995). |
Bonftls, E. and N. T. Thuong. “Solid Phase Synthesis of 5', 3'Bifunctional Oligodeoxyribonucleotides Bearing a Masked Thiol Group at the 3'-End,” Tetrahedron Letters 32(26): 3053-3056 (1991). |
Braun et al., “Improved Analysis of Microsatellites Using Mass Spectrometry”, Genomics 46:18-23 (1997). |
Brummel et al. “Evaluation of mass spectrometric methods applicable to the direct analysis of non-peptide bead-bound combinatorial libraries”, Anal. Chem., 1996, v. 68, pp. 237-242. |
Certified English language translation of WO98/03257, Jan. 1998 “Solid supports for analytical measurement methods, their production and their use”. |
Chrisey et al., Covalent attachment of synthetic DNA to self-assembled monolayer films, Nucl. Acids Res. 24:3031-3039 (1996). |
Chrisey et at, Fabrication of patterned DNA surfaces, Nucl. Acids. Res. 24:3040- 3047 (1996). |
Church et al., “Multiplex DNA Sequencing”, Science 240:185-188 (1988). |
Crain, “Mass spectrometric techniques in nucleic acid research”, Mass Spectr. Rev. 9:505-554 (1990). |
Dai, Yugin, et al., Two-Layer Sample Preparation: A Method for MALDJ-MS Analysis of Complex Peptide and Protein Mixtures, Analytical. Chemistry, (1999), 1087-1097 71(5), American Chemical Society. |
Database WPI, Derwent Publications #198942, citing International PCT Application No. WO 89/09406 published Oct. 5, 1989. |
Database WPI, Derwent Publications #199703, citing Japanese Patent No: 8290377 published Nov. 5, 1996. |
Database WPI, WPI Acc. No. 98-348616/199830, citing International PCT Application No. WO 98/26179 published Jun. 18, 1998. |
Day et al. “Immobilization of polynucleotides on magnetic particles,” Biochem. J. 278: 735-740 (1991). |
Debitsudo, A. “121:109581 h Preparation of oligonucleotide monolayer,” Chemical Abstracts 121: 1163:1163 (1994). |
Debitsudo, A. “121:83891g Preparation of nucleotide thioalkyl esters and monomolecular membrane,” Chemical Abstracts 121: 1166 (1994). |
Debitsudo, A. “122:291447q Organic super-thin fim of oligonucleotide derivative and method for its preparation,” Chemical Abstracts 122: 1100 (1995). |
Derwent #002061834, WPI Acc. No. 90-302767, for Japanese Application No. JP 2215399, Aug. 1990, Method for detecting DNA—includes de-naturing to single strand, combining with DNA primer having corresp. base sequence forming replicator etc. |
Derwent #011716230, WPI Acc. No. 1998/199813, for PCT Patent Application WO 98/05965 A, Feb. 1998, “Identification of characteristics of eukaryotic cells -after covalent immobilisation on solid support,”. |
Derwent No. 011999582, WPI Ace. No. 1998-416492/199836 for PCT Patent Application WO 98/34116 A1 ,Aug. 1998, “Isolation and determination of analyte -by capture on specific binding particles and concentration of these on second, limited binding surface before detection, used e.g. for detecting RNA,”. |
Derwent #01201061 , WPI Acc. No. 1998-428971/199837, for German Application No. DE 19731479 A1, Aug. 1998 “Device for analysis of target chemicals has light emitting array -with chemical binder elements attached to array to capture target chemicals which change emitted light pattern accordingly”. |
Emmett, M.R. and R.M. Caprioli. “Micro-Electrospray Mass Spectrometry: Ultra-High-Sensitivity Analysis of Peptides and Proteins,” J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrometry 5: 605-613 (1994). |
English language abstract from Japanese Patent Office for JP-A-8-233710. |
English version of Japanese Patent, JP2215399, Aug. 8, 1990, WPI Derwent, 008415766, “Method for detecting DNA de-naturing single strand combination DNA primer having corresp. base sequence forming replicator, etc.”. |
English version of Japanese Patent, JP63230086 A 880926 DW8844, WPI Derwent, AN88-311964, Sep. 26, 1988, “Carry immobilize physiological active substance comprise bind chain form di sulphide compound epoxy group latex contain polymer particle.”. |
Fast Evaporation, http://www.chemistry.wustl.edu/-msf/damon/samp—fast13 evap.html, pp. 1-2, Sample Preparation—Fast Evaporation. Downloaded Dec. 8, 2004. |
Greene and Wuts, Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, 2nd Edition, Wiley & Sons (1991). |
Hayashi et al., Immobilization of thiol proteases onto porous poly(vinyl alcohol) beads, Polymer Journal, 25:5,489-497(1993). |
Hillenkamp and Ehring, Laser desorption mass spectrometry Part 1: Basic mechanisms and techniques, Mass Spectrometry in the Biological Sciences: A tutorial, pp. 165-179 (1992). |
Hillenkamp et al., Matrix assisted UV-laser desorption lionization: A new approach to mass spectrometry of large biomolecules, Bio mass Spectr., Burlingame and McCloskey (eds.), pp. 49-61, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam (1989). |
Hofstadler et al. “Capillary Electrophoresis—Electrospray Ionization Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry for Direct Analysis of Cellular Proteins,” Anal. Chem. 67: 1477-1480 (1995). |
Jespersen et al. “Attomole Detection of Proteins by Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption/lonization Mass Spectrometry with the Use of Picolitre Vials,” Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 8(8): 581-584 (1994). |
Jett et al., “High-Speed DNA Sequencing: An Approach Based Upon fluorescence Detection of Single Molecules” J. Bio Strut & Dynam. 7(2):301-09 (1989). |
Koster et al., “A strategy for rapid and efficient DNA sequencing by mass spectrometry”, Nature Bio 14:11231128 (1996). |
Koster et al., “Well-Defined Insoluble Primers for the Enzymatic Synthesis of Oligo and Polynucleotides”, Hoppe-Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chern. 359:1579-1589 (1978). |
Koster et al. N-acyl protecting groups for deoxynucleotides: A quantitative and comparative study, Tetrahedron 37:363-369 (1981). |
Koster et at. Oligonucleotide synthesis and multiplex DNA sequencing using chemiluminescent detection, Nucl. Acids Res.• Symposium Series No. 24:318-321, (1991). |
Kozal et al., “Extensive Polymorph isms Observed in HIV-1 Clade B Protease Gene Using High-Density Oligonucleotide Arrays,” Nature Medicine, vol. 2, No. 7, pp. 753-159, (1996). |
Landegren et al.. “DNA Diagnostics-Molecular techniques and automation”, Science 242:229-237 (1988). |
Lee, et al., Direct Measurement of the Forces Between Complementary Strands of DNA, Science, vol. 266, Nov. 4, 1994, 771-773. |
Li et al., “High-Resolution MALDI Fourier Transform Mass Spectrometry of Oligonucleotides”, Anal Chem. 68(13):2090-2096 (1996). |
Li et al. “Analysis of Single Mammalain Cell Lysates by Mass Spectrometry,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118: 11662-11663 (1996). |
Little et al., “Direct detection of synthetic and biologically generated double stranded DNA by MALDI-TOF MS”, J. Mass Spec 17:1-8 (1997). |
Little et al., “MALDI on a Chip: Analysis of Arrays of Low-Femto-mole to Sub-femto-mole Quantities of Synthetic Oligonucleotides and DNA Diagnostic Products Dispensed by a Piezoelectric Pipet”, Anal Chem. 69:4540-4546 (1997). |
Little et al., “Mass spectrometry from miniaturized arrays for full comparative DNA analysis”, Nature Med 3(12):1413-1416 (1997). |
Lyttle et al., “Versatile Linker Chemistry for Synthesis of 3'-Modified DNA”, Chem. Abst., 128(18):314 (1997). |
M.C. Fitzgerald et al., “The promise of matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry,” Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 24: 117-140 (1995). |
Manoharan et al., “A 2'-O-thiol Tether in the Ribose Moiety of Nucleic Acids for Conjugation Chemistry”, Gene, 149: 147-156 (1994). |
Martin, “New technologies for large-genome sequencing”, Genome 31:1073-1080 (1969). |
McCray and Trentham, “Properties and uses of photo reactive caged compounds”, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chern. 18:239-270 (1989). |
Microdrop mbh. Nordersted. Germany, Autodrop system, “high precision liquid handling in the pico-to nanoliter range,” Downloaded Sep. 16, 1999. |
Moini et al., “A moving belt device to couple high-performance liquid chromatography and chemical reaction interface mass spectrometry”, Bio Mass Spect 20:308-312 (1991). |
Nelson et al., Time-of-flight mass spectrometry of nucleic acids by laser ablation and ionization from a frozen aqueous matrix, Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 4:348-351 (1990). |
Nelson et al., “Volatilization of high molecular weight DNA by pulsed laser ablation of frozen aqueous solutions”, Science 246: 1585-1587 (1989). |
Nicola, Anthony J., et al., Application of the Fast-evaporation Sample Preparation Method for improving Quantification of Angiotensin II by Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption/lonization, Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, (1995), 1164-1171, 9, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Nordhoff et al., “Ion stability of nucleic acids in infrared matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry”, Nuc Acids Res. 21(15):3347-3357 (1993). |
Nordhoff et al., “Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry of nucleic acids with wavelength in the ultraviolet and infrared”, Rapid Comm. Mass Spectrom. 6:771-776 (1992). |
O'Donnell et al., “Mass Array as an enabling technology for the industrial-scale analysis of DNA”, Genetic Engineering News 17(21) (1997). |
O'Donnell et al., “High-Density, Covalent Attachment of DNA to Silicon Wafers for Analysis by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry”, Analytical Chemistry 69(13):2438- 2443 (1991). |
O'Donnell-Maloney et al., “The development of micro fabricated arrays for DNA sequencing and analysis” TIBTECH 14:401-407 (1996). |
O'Donnell-Maloney et al.. “Micro fabrication and array technologies for DNA sequencing and diagnostics”, Genetic Analysis: Bimolecular Engineering 13:151-157 (1996). |
Office Action Mailed: Mar. 18, 2003 for U.S. Appl. No. 08/786,988, filed 01/23/1009 now issued patent 7,285,422 issued on Oct. 23, 2007. |
On-Probe Decontamination for MALDI Samples, pp. 1-2, http://www.chemistry.msu.edu/faculty/bruening/onprobepurification.htm, Matrix. Downloaded Dec. 8, 2004. |
Overberg et al., “Laser desorption mass spectrometry: part II performance and applications of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization of large biomolecules”, Mass Spect in the Biolog Science: A Tutorial 181-197 (1992). |
Pon et al., “Derivatization of Controlled Pore Glass Beads for Solid Phase Oligonucleotide Synthesis” Bio Technique 6(8): 768-770 773-775 (1988). |
Rolfs et al., PCR: Clinical Diagnostics and Research. Springer-Verlag (1992). |
Ruppert et al., “A rapid and high throughput method for plasmid isolations”. Presented: Automation in Mapping and DNA Sequencing Conference. Aug. 31-Sep. 2, 1994. |
Ruppert et al. “Preparation of plasmid DNA as Sequencing Templates in a Microtiter Plate Format”, Paper presented. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 1995. |
Sample Preparation—References. pp. 1-3 http address www.chemistry.wustl.edu/.about.mef/damon/samp.sub.-prep.sub.—references.html. |
Schober, et al., Accurate High-Speed Liquid Handling of Very Small Biological Samples, BiotechniQues, (1993) 15(2):324-329. |
Schram. Karl H., “Mass spectrometry of nucleic acid components”, Bio Appl of Mass Spect. 34:203-287 (1990). |
SEQUENOM Advances the Industrial Genomics Revolution with the Launch of Its DNA MassArmy.TM. Automated Process Line, Press Release: Sep. 28, 1998. http://www.seQuenom.comlpressrelease.com. |
SEQUENOM Reports DNA MassArray.TM. Technology More Sensitive Than Electrophoretic Methods in Detecting Gene Mutations: Automated DNA Analysis System Can Speed Up Microsatellite Analyses. Press Release: Dec. 15. 1997, http://www.sequenom.comlpressrelease.htm. |
Sequenom Reports on Use of Its DNA MassArray.TM. Technology to Analyze Genes Associated with Alzheimer's Disease and Arteriosclerosis: Technology Has Applications in Drug Development. Press Release: Sep. 22, 1997, http://www.sequenom.comlpressrelease.htm. |
Sequenom Signs Agreement With Bruker-Franzen Analytik to Develop Mass Spectrometer for DNA Massarray Analysis. Press Release: Jan. 12, 1998. http://www.sequenom.comlpressrelease.htm. |
Sequenom Uses DNA MassArray.TM. to Sequence Section of Human Cancer—Related p53 GeneM, Press Release: Mar. 27, 1998. http://www.sequenom.comlpressrelease.htm. |
Shaler et al.. “Effect of Impurities on the matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Mass Spectra of Single-Stranded Oligodeoxynucleotides”. Anal. Chem. 68:576-579 (1996). |
Siuzdak. Gary. “The emergence of mass spectrometry in biochemical research”, PNAS USA 91:11290-11297 (1994). |
Smith R. D., “New developments in biochemical mass spectrometry: Electrospray Ionization”, Anal. Chem. 62:882-899(1990). |
Smith. Cassandra L., “cDNA Fingerprinting of Breast Cancer Tumor Cells”, Boston Univ., MA. 3-12, (1996). |
Solouki et al. “Attomole Biomolecule Mass Analysis by MAtrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/lonization Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance,” Anal. Chem. 67:4139-4144 (1995). |
Stults and Marsters, “Improved electrospray ionization of synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides”, Rapid Comm. Mass Spectrom. 5:359-363 (1991). |
Tang et al., “Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry of immobilized duplex DNA probes”, Nucleic Acids Research 23:3126-3131 (1995). |
Tomer et al., “Coaxial Continuous Flow Fast Atom Bombardment for Higher-Molecular-Weight Peptides: Comparison with Static Fast Atom Bombardment and electrospray Ionization”, Bio Mass Spect 20:783-788 (1991). |
Trainor, “DNA Sequencing, Automation, and the Human Genome”, Anal. Chern. 62:418-426 (1990). |
Valaskovic et al. “Attomole Protein Characterization by Capillary Electrophoresis—Mass Spectrometry,” Science 273: 1199-1202 (1996). |
Valaskovic et al. “Attomole-Sensitivity Electrospray Source for Large-Molecule Mass Spectrometry,” Anal. Chem. 67: 3802-3805 (1995). |
Vorm, et al, Improved Mass Accuracy in Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/lonization Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometry of Peptides. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, Nov, 1994, V5(N11): 955-958. |
Vorm, Ole, et al., Improved Resolution and Very High Sensitivity in MALDI TOF of Matrix Surface Made by Fast Evaporation, Analytical Chemistry, (1994), 3281-3287, 66(19), American Chemical Society. |
Wahl et al. “Use of small-diameter capillaries for increasing peptide and protein detection sensitivity in capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry,” Electrophoresis 14: 448-457 (1993). |
Wallace, “Ink-Jet Based Fluid Micro dispensing in Biochemical Applications,” Microfab Technologies Inc., Laboratory Automation News, vol. 1, No., 5 pp. 6-9, (1996). |
Williams, Time of flight mass spectrometry of DNA laser-ablated from frozen aqueous solutions: applications to the Human Genome Project, Inti. J. Mass Spectrom. and Ion Processes 131:335-344 {1994}. |
Wilm et al. “Electrospray and Taylor-Cone theory, Dole's beam of macromolecules at last,” International Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Ion Processes 136: 167-180 (1994). |
Wu et al., Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry of Oligonucleotides Using 3-Hydroxypicolinic Acid as an Ultraviolet-sensitive Matrix, Rapid Comm Mass Spec 7:142-146 (1993). |
Wu et al., “Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry of Underivatized Single-Stranded DNA Oligomers by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption”, Anal. Chem. 66:1637-1645 (1994). |
Zhang et al. “Micro-preparation Procedure for High-sensitivity Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Mass Spectrometry,” Journal of Mass Spectrometry 30: 1768-1771 (1995). |
Zhang et al. “Capillary electrophoresis combined with MALDI-MS spectrometry: continuous deposition on a matrix-precoated membrane target”, J. Mass Spectr., 1996, v. 31, No. 9, pp. 1039-1046 (Abstract). |
Zuckerman et al., Efficient methods for attachment of thiol specific probes to the 3'-ends of synthetic oligodeoxyribonucleotides, Nucleic Acids Research, 15:13, 5305-5321 (1987). |
Ardrey, “Electrospray mass spectrometry”, Spectroscopy Europe 4(4):10-18 (1992). |
Ehring, H. et al., “Photochemical versus thermal mechanisms in matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization probed by back side desorption”, Rapid Comm. in Mass Spect. 10:821-824 (1996). |
Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/683,214, filed Nov. 21, 2012 and published as US 2013-0079247 on Mar. 28, 2013. |
Office Action dated Jul. 2, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/625,719, filed Sep. 24, 2012 and published as US 2013-0017128 on Jan. 17, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080248968 A1 | Oct 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 08786988 | Jan 1997 | US |
Child | 11764711 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11764711 | Jun 2007 | US |
Child | 12123378 | US |