Many audio reproduction systems are capable of recording, transmitting, and playing back synchronous multi-channel audio, sometimes referred to as “surround sound.” Though entertainment audio began with simplistic monophonic systems, it soon developed two-channel (stereo) and higher channel-count formats (surround sound) in an effort to capture a convincing spatial image and sense of listener immersion. In particular, surround sound is a technique for enhancing reproduction of an audio signal by using more than two audio channels. Content is delivered over multiple discrete audio channels and reproduced using an array of loudspeakers (or speakers). The additional audio channels, or “surround channels,” provide an immersive listening experience for a listener.
Surround sound systems typically have speakers positioned around the listener to give the listener a sense of sound localization and envelopment. Many surround sound systems having only a few channels (such as a 5.1 format) have the speakers positioned in specific locations in a 360-degree arc about the listener. These speakers are arranged such that all of the speakers are in the same plane. Moreover, the listener's ears are also approximately in the same plane as each of the speakers. Higher-channel count surround sound systems (such 7.1, 11.1, and so forth) also include height or elevation speakers that are positioned above the plane of the listener's ears. Often these surround sound configurations include a discrete low-frequency effects (LFE) channel that provides additional low-frequency bass audio to supplement the bass audio in the other audio channels. Because this LFE channel requires only a portion of the bandwidth of the other audio channels, it is designated as the “.X” channel, where X is any positive integer including zero (as in 5.1 or 7.1 surround sound).
Ideally surround sound audio is mixed into discrete channels and those channels are kept discrete through playback to the listener. In reality, however, storage and transmission limitations dictate that the file size of the surround sound audio be reduced to minimize storage space and transmission bandwidth. Moreover, two-channel audio content is typically compatible with a larger variety of broadcasting and reproduction systems as compared to audio content having more than two channels.
Matrixing was developed to address these needs. Matrixing involves “downmixing” an original signal having more than two discrete audio channels into a two-channel audio signal. The additional channels are downmixed according to a pre-determined process to generate a two-channel downmix that includes information from all of the audio channels. The additional audio channels may later be extracted and synthesized from the two-channel downmix using an upmix process such that the original channel mix can be recovered to some level of approximation. Upmixing accepts the two-channel audio signal as input and generates a larger number of channels for playback. The playback is an acceptable approximation of the discrete audio channels of the original signal.
Some upmixing techniques use constant-power panning. The concept of “panning” is derived from the film world and specifically the word “panorama.” Panorama means to have a complete visual view of a given area in every direction. In the audio realm, audio can be panned in the stereo field so that the audio is perceived as being positioned in physical space such that all the sounds in a performance are heard by a listener in their proper location and dimension. For musical recordings, a common practice is to place the musical instruments where they would be physically located on a real stage. For example, stage left instruments are panned left and stage right instruments are panned right. This idea seeks to replicate a real-life performance for the listener during playback.
Constant-power panning maintains constant signal power across audio channels as the input audio signal is distributed among them. Although constant-power panning is widespread, current downmixing and upmixing techniques struggle to preserve and recover the precise panning behavior and localization present in an original mix. In addition, some techniques are prone to artifacts, and all have limited ability to separate independent signals that overlap in time and frequency but originate from different spatial directions.
For example, some popular upmixing techniques use voltage-controlled amplifiers to normalize both input channels to approximately the same level. These two signals then are combined in an ad-hoc manner to produce the output channels. Due to this ad-hoc approach, however, the final output has difficulty achieving desired panning behaviors and includes problems with crosstalk and at best approximates discrete surround-sound audio.
Other types of upmixing techniques are precise only in a few panning locations but are imprecise away from those locations. By way of example, some upmixing techniques define a limited number of panning locations where upmixing results in precise and predictable behavior. Dominance vector analysis is used to interpolate between a limited number of pre-defined sets of dematrixing coefficients at the precise panning location points. Any panning location falling between the points use interpolation to find the dematrixing coefficient values. Due to this interpolation, panning locations falling between the precise points can be imprecise and adversely affect audio quality.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Embodiments of the constant-power pairwise panning upmixing system and method preserve and recover the precise panning localization during the upmix process. This is achieved using a closed-form solution to generate precise and correct dematrixing coefficients. These dematrixing coefficients are used to determine how much of the original two channels are mixed into the new output channels. This closed-form solution precisely and exactly solves for the dematrixing coefficients at any panning locations. Any panning location can be precisely determined from the downmixed two-channel audio for any point 360 degrees around the listener in the horizontal plane that includes the speakers and the listener's ears.
The precision of the closed-form solution leads to improved sound of the upmixed audio that is reproduced to a listener. By way of example and not limitation, assume that the audio content was originally mixed in two channels and contains a sequence where the audio is slowly panned from the left channel to the right channel using a Sin/Cos panning law. If the two channels are upmixed to a 5.1 target speaker layout using embodiments of the constant-power pairwise panning upmixing system and method, then that sequence will start at the left channel, then will slowly begin to pan to the center channel, as it gets to the center channel it will be discretely in the center, then it will begin to pan between the center and the right channel. The surround speakers will remain silent the entire time.
On the other hand, because current upmixing techniques lack a closed-form solution framework, in the same situation the audio will start at the left channel and as it reaches the point between the left and center channels there will be leakage into the right channel and the surround channels. The audio will be discrete in the center channel because this is one of the pre-determined interpolation points. As the audio moves to the point between the center and right channels there will be leakage into the left channel and the surround channels. This is because when the audio is between the left and center channels and the right and center channels, current methods perform an interpolation of dematrixing coefficients. Because the dematrixing coefficients are not precisely correct there is leakage between channels.
Embodiments of the constant-power pairwise panning upmixing system and method are used to upmix a stereo audio signal having two channels to a target speaker layout having more than two channels. The target speaker layout can have virtually any number of channels. However, embodiments of the constant-power pairwise panning upmixing system and method are restricted to target speaker layouts having speakers that are located approximately in the same plane as the listener's ears. This concept is discussed in more detail below.
The constant-power pairwise panning upmixing system and method makes an assumption about the type of panning laws that were used during the creation of the audio content. In other words, the system and method assume that a certain panning law was used by either the downmixing process or by the mixing engineer. In some embodiments, the constant-power pairwise panning upmixing system and method assume a Sin/Cos pan law. In other embodiments, several different other types of panning laws may be used.
The panning laws are assumed by embodiments of the constant-power pairwise panning upmixing system and method because it typically will not know the panning laws that were used in the creation or downmixing of the content. In addition, the system and method usually will receive as input one of two types of stereo input signals. Generally, therefore, the system, and method operates in one of two modes, and usually is not aware of which mode it is operating.
The first mode is processing an already downmixed audio signal. For example, content that was originally recorded in 5.1 is downmixed to a matrix-encoded stereo signal and provided to the system and method. In this situation the matrix-encoded stereo signal is passed along to the upmixer for upmixing and rendering on a playback device. The second mode is used when the input is a stereo audio signal having stereo-mixed content that was original mixed in stereo and never downmixed. This includes, for example, content that was originally mixed into a legacy stereo signal and never downmixed. In this situation, the stereo signal is upmixed to a higher-channel count mix, such as a 7.1 mix.
Regardless of the history of the input stereo signal, the signal is analyzed to recover an estimate of the underlying parameters that were used in the panning laws during content creation. These parameters include the panning angles that were used in the creation of the content. These estimated parameters are used during the upmix process to obtain dematrixing coefficients. The dematrixing coefficients are used to generate output channels with as accurate channel energies as when the original signal was created.
The upmixed signal then is reproduced across the target speaker layout. Typically, the target speaker layout contains a channel count equal to or higher than the original audio signals. For example, the original stereo signal could be upmixed to a target speaker layout of 5.1, 7.1, or 9.1. As noted above, however, embodiments of the constant-power pairwise panning upmixing system and method are limited to speaker configurations that are roughly in the same plane as the listener's ears. In other words, each of the speakers in the target speaker layout is in the same plane, and that horizontal plane roughly includes both ears of the listener. This means that the target speaker layout does not include any out-of-horizontal plane speakers, such as height or elevated speakers.
Embodiments of the constant-power pairwise panning upmixing system and method include upmixing a two-channel input audio signal having a first input channel and a second input channel into an upmixed multi-channel output audio signal having greater than two channels. The method calculates a first dematrixing coefficient and a second dematrixing coefficient based on an inter-channel level difference (ICLD) and an inter-channel phase difference (ICPD) between the first and second input channels. The method then multiplies the first input channel by the first dematrixing coefficient to generate a first sub-signal and multiplies the second input channel by the second dematrixing coefficient to generate a second sub-signal. These two sub-signals are mixed together in a linear manner to generate an output channel of the upmixed multi-channel output audio signal. The generated output channel is output for playback through a target speaker layout. The target speaker layout may include a plurality of speakers or may be headphones.
Embodiments of the constant-power pairwise panning upmixing system and method also include a method for generating an upmixed multi-channel output audio signal having N output channels from a two-channel input audio signal having a left input channel and a right input channel. In addition, N is a positive integer greater than two. The method calculates the first dematrixing coefficient based on a first trigonometric function of a combination of an in-phase signal component and an out-of-phase signal component. In addition, the method calculates a second dematrixing coefficient based on a second trigonometric function of the combination of the in-phase signal component and the out-of-phase signal component.
The method then generates each of the N output channels by mixing in a linear manner the first dematrixing coefficient times the left or right input channel and the second dematrixing coefficient times the right or left input channel. The method also causes each of the N output channels of the upmixed multi-channel output audio signal to be played back through speakers in a multi-channel playback environment.
It should be noted that alternative embodiments are possible, and steps and elements discussed herein may be changed, added, or eliminated, depending on the particular embodiment. These alternative embodiments include alternative steps and alternative elements that may be used, and structural changes that may be made, without departing from the scope of the invention.
Referring now to the drawings in which like reference numbers represent corresponding parts throughout:
In the following description of embodiments of a constant-power pairwise panning upmixing system and method reference is made to the accompanying drawings. These drawings shown by way of illustration specific examples of how embodiments of the constant-power pairwise panning upmixing system and method may be practiced. It is understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Embodiments of the constant-power pairwise panning upmixing system and method upmix a two-channel input audio signal to a multi-channel output audio signal having more than two channels using a closed-form solution to precisely determine dematrixing coefficients. These dematrixing coefficients are used to weight each of the two input channels and determine how much of each input channel is contained in each output channel. Embodiments of the constant-power pairwise panning upmixing system and method are used to create a surround sound experience with multiple output channels for a listener when the input is a stereo signal.
In
The stereo mix 130 is delivered for consumption by a listener in a delivery environment 140. Several delivery options are available, including streaming delivery over a network 150. Alternatively, the stereo mix 130 may be recorded on a media 160 such as optical disk or film for consumption by the listener. In addition, there is many other delivery options not enumerated here that may be used to deliver the stereo mix 130.
Whatever the delivery method, the stereo mix 130 is input to a matrix decoder and upmixer 170. The matrix decoder and upmixer 170 includes embodiments of the constant-power pairwise panning upmixing system and method. The matrix encoder and downmixer 120 and embodiments of the constant-power pairwise panning upmixing system and method 180 are typically located on a computing device having one or more processing devices.
The matrix decoder and upmixer 170 decodes each channel of the stereo mix 130 and expands them into discrete output channels. In
Whether the target speaker layout is actual speakers or headphones, the playback of the reconstructed 5.1 mix 185 provides the listener 195 with an immersive surround sound experience from a stereo input audio signal. It should be noted that although the target speaker layout is a 5.1 configuration, in other embodiments any number of speakers may be used as long as the number is greater than two.
Embodiments of the constant-power pairwise panning upmixing system 180 and method are designed such that the playback environment 190 includes speakers that are located in the same horizontal plane and that plane includes the listener's ears.
Each of the speakers is located in a horizontal plane 250. In addition, each of the listener's ears 260 also is located in the horizontal plane 250. Although a 5.1 and 7.1 layout are shown in
It should be noted that in
The system details of components of embodiments of the constant-power pairwise panning upmixing system will now be discussed. It should be noted that only a few of the several ways in which the system may be implemented are detailed below. Many variations are possible from that which is shown in
Input to the system 300 includes a two-channel input audio signal 310 having a Left Total channel (LT) and a Right Total channel (RT). These two channel are input to an inter-channel level difference (ICLD) and inter-channel phase difference (ICPD) computation module 320. The computation module 320 computes the inter-channel level difference for each channel using the two input channels. Moreover, the computation module 320 calculates the inter-channel phase difference between the Left Total channel and the Right Total channel using the two input channels. This information is passed to a panning angle estimator 330.
Based on the inter-channel level difference, the estimator 330 estimates a panning angle for each output channel. The panning angle is the angle in the horizontal plane 250 from which the sound appears to originate during playback.
In
The panning angle estimations from the panning angle estimator 330 are passed to a coefficient calculator 340. The coefficient calculator 340 uses the estimated panning angle to calculate in-phase coefficients and out-of-phase coefficients (collectively called phase coefficients) for each output channel. Using these coefficients and the inter-channel phase difference, the coefficient calculator 340 determines the dematrixing coefficients for each output channel. These dematrixing coefficients and phase coefficients are passed to an output channel generator 350.
For each output channel, the output channel generator 350 multiplies the Left Total channel and the Right Total channel by their corresponding dematrixing coefficients to generate the particular output channel. Thus, at any given time during playback of audio content each output channel is a mixture of the Left Total channel and the Right Total channel. This mixture is determined by the dematrixing coefficients and especially the phase coefficients.
Once all of the discrete output channels have been generated, the output channel generator 350 outputs an upmixed multi-channel output audio signal 360. In the exemplary example shown in
The method then mixes the first sub-signal and the second sub-signal together in a linear manner to generate an output channel (box 540). This process is repeated in a similar manner for each of the output channels by finding new dematrixing coefficients for each output channel (box 550). Although the dematrixing coefficients typically will be different for each output channel, this will not always be true. Each of the discrete output channels creates an upmixed multi-channel output audio signal for playback through playback devices (box 560), such as speakers or headphones.
The operational details of embodiments of the constant-power pairwise panning upmixing system 300 and method now will be discussed.
The method then calculates an inter-channel level difference between the left and right channels using the left and right channels (box 610). This calculation is shown in detail below. Moreover, the method uses the inter-channel level difference to compute an estimated panning angle (box 620). In addition, an inter-channel phase difference is computed by the method using the left and right input channels (box 630). This inter-channel phase difference determines a relative phase difference between the left and right input channels that indicates whether the left and right signals of the two-channel input audio signal are in-phase or out-of-phase.
Some embodiments of the constant-power pairwise panning upmixing system 300 and method utilize a panning angle (θ) to determine the downmix process and subsequent upmix process from the two-channel downmix. Moreover, some embodiments assume a Sin/Cos panning law. In these situations, the two-channel downmix is calculated as a function of the panning angle as:
where Xi is an input channel, L and R are the downmix channels, θ is a panning angle (normalized between 0 and 1), and the polarity of the panning weights is determined by the location of input channel Xi. In traditional matrixing systems it is common for input channels located in front of the listener to be downmixed with in-phase signal components (in other words, with equal polarity of the panning weights) and for output channels located behind the listener to be downmixed with out-of-phase signal components (in other words, with opposite polarity of the panning weights).
L=0.707·C
R=0.707·C
To synthesize the additional audio channels from a two-channel downmix, an estimate of the panning angle (or estimated panning angle, denoted as {circumflex over (θ)}) can be calculated from the inter-channel level difference (denoted as ICLD). Let the ICLD be defined as:
Assuming that a signal component is generated via intensity panning using the Sin/Cos panning law, the ICLD can be expressed as a function of the panning angle estimate:
The panning angle estimate then can be expressed as a function of the ICLD:
The following angle sum and difference identities will be used throughout the remaining derivations:
sin(α±β)=sin(α)cos(δ)±cos(α)sin(β)
cos(α±β)=cos(α)cos(β)±sin(α)sin(β)
Moreover, the following derivations assume a 5.1 surround sound output configuration. However, this analysis can easily be applied to additional channels.
A Center channel is generated from a two-channel downmix using the following equation:
C=αL+bR
where the a and b coefficients are determined based on the panning angle estimate 6 to achieve certain pre-defined goals.
For the in-phase components of the Center channel a desired panning behavior is illustrated in
C=sin({circumflex over (θ)}π)
Substituting the desired Center channel panning behavior for in-phase components and the assumed Sin/Cos downmix functions yields:
Using the angle sum identities, the dematrixing coefficients, including a first dematrixing coefficient (denoted as a) and a second dematrixing coefficients (denoted as b), can be derived as:
For the out-of-phase components of the Center channel a desired panning behavior is illustrated in
C=0
Substituting the desired Center channel panning behavior for out-of-phase components and the assumed Sin/Cos downmix functions leads to:
Using the angle sum identities, the a and b coefficients can be derived as:
The surround channels are generated from a two-channel downmix using the following equations:
Ls=aL−bR
Rs=aR−bL
where LS is the left surround channel and RS is the right surround channel. Moreover, the a and b coefficients are determined based on the estimated panning angle {circumflex over (θ)} to achieve certain pre-defined goals.
The ideal panning behavior for in-phase components of the Left Surround channel is illustrated in
Ls=0
Substituting the desired Left Surround channel panning behavior for in-phase components and the assumed Sin/Cos downmix functions leads to:
Using the angle sum identities, the a and b coefficients are derived as:
The goal for the Left Surround channel for out-of-phase components is to achieve panning behavior as illustrated by the out-of-phase plot 1100 in
θLs=Left Surround encoding angle (˜0.25)
θRs=Right Surround encoding angle (˜0.75)
The a and b coefficients for the Left Surround channel are generated via a piecewise function due to the piecewise behavior of the desired output. For {circumflex over (θ)}≦θLs, the desired panning behavior for the Left Surround channel corresponds to:
Substituting the desired Left Surround channel panning behavior for out-of-phase components and the assumed Sin/Cos downmix functions leads to:
Using the angle sum identities, the a and b coefficients can be derived as:
For θLs<{circumflex over (θ)}≦θRs, the desired panning behavior for the Left Surround channel corresponds to:
Substituting the desired Left Surround channel panning behavior for out-of-phase components and the assumed Sin/Cos downmix functions leads to:
Using the angle sum identities, the a and b coefficients can be derived as:
For {circumflex over (θ)}>θRs, the desired panning behavior for the Left Surround channel corresponds to:
Ls=0
Substituting the desired Left Surround channel panning behavior for out-of-phase components and the assumed Sin/Cos downmix functions leads to:
Using the angle sum identities, the a and b coefficients can be derived as:
The a and b coefficients for the Right Surround channel generation are calculated similarly to those for the Left Surround channel generation as described above.
The Left and Right channels are modified using the following equations to remove (either fully or partially) those components generated in the Center and Surround channels:
L′=aL−bR
R′=aR−bL
where the a and b coefficients are determined based on the panning angle estimate ti to achieve certain pre-defined goals and L′ is the modified Left channel and R′ is the modified Right channel.
The goal for the modified Left channel for in-phase components is to achieve panning behavior as illustrated by the in-phase plot 1200 in
For {circumflex over (θ)}≦0.5, the desired panning behavior for the modified Left channel corresponds to:
Substituting the desired modified Left channel panning behavior for in-phase components and the assumed Sin/Cos downmix functions leads to:
Using the angle sum identities, the a and b coefficients can be derived as:
For {circumflex over (θ)}>0.5, the desired panning behavior for the modified Left channel corresponds to:
L′=0
Substituting the desired modified Left channel panning behavior for in-phase components and the assumed Sin/Cos downmix functions leads to:
Using the angle sum identities, the a and b coefficients can be derived as:
The goal for the modified Left channel for out-of-phase components is to achieve panning behavior as illustrated by the out-of-phase plot 1300 in
For {circumflex over (θ)}≦θLs, the desired panning behavior for the modified Left channel corresponds to:
Substituting the desired modified Left channel panning behavior for out-of-phase components and the assumed Sin/Cos downmix functions leads to:
Using the angle sum identities, the a and b coefficients can be derived as:
For {circumflex over (θ)}>θLs, the desired panning behavior for the modified Left channel corresponds to:
L′=0.
Substituting the desired modified Left channel panning behavior for out-of-phase components and the assumed Sin/Cos downmix functions leads to:
Using the angle sum identities, the a and b coefficients can be derived as:
The a and b coefficients for the modified Right channel generation are calculated similarly to those for the modified Left channel generation as described above.
The channel synthesis derivations presented above are based on achieving desired panning behavior for source content that is either in-phase or out-of-phase. The relative phase difference of the source content can be determined through the Inter-Channel Phase Difference (ICPD) property defined as:
where * denotes complex conjugation.
The ICPD value is bounded in the range [−1,1] where values of −1 indicate that the components are out-of-phase and values of 1 indicate that the components are in-phase. The ICPD property can then be used to determine the final a and b coefficients to use in the channel synthesis equations using linear interpolation. However, instead of interpolating the a and b coefficients directly, it can be noted that all of the a and b coefficients are generated using trigonometric functions of the panning angle estimate {circumflex over (θ)}.
The linear interpolation is thus carried out on the angle arguments of the trigonometric functions. Performing the linear interpolation in this manner has two main advantages. First, it preserves the property that a2+b2=1 for any panning angle and ICPD value. Second, it reduces the number of trigonometric function calls required thereby reducing processing requirements.
The angle interpolation uses a modified ICPD value normalized to the range [0,1] calculated as:
The channel outputs are computed as shown below.
The Center output channel is generated using the modified ICPD value, which is defined as:
C=aL+bR,
where
Referring again to
The Left Surround output channel is generated using the modified ICPD value, which is defined as:
The Right Surround output channel is generated using the modified ICPD value, which is defined as:
Note that the a and b coefficients for the Right Surround channel are generated similarly to the Left Surround channel, apart from using (1−{circumflex over (θ)}) as the panning angle instead of {circumflex over (θ)}.
The modified Left output channel is generated using the modified ICPD value as follows:
The modified Right output channel is generated using the modified ICPD value as follows:
Note that the a and b coefficients for the Right channel are generated similarly to the Left channel, apart from using (1−{circumflex over (θ)}) as the panning angle instead of {circumflex over (θ)}.
The subject matter discussed above is a system for generating Center, Left Surround, Right Surround, Left, and Right channels from a two-channel downmix. However, the system may be easily modified to generate other additional audio channels by defining additional panning behaviors.
Referring again to
After generating the output channels to obtain the upmixed multi-channel output audio signal, each output channel is output for reproduction in the playback environment 190 (box 670). The reproduction system may then play each audio channel over a target speaker layout. This playback will substantially recreate the original audio content before it was downmixed to two channels.
Many other variations than those described herein will be apparent from this document. For example, depending on the embodiment, certain acts, events, or functions of any of the methods and algorithms described herein can be performed in a different sequence, can be added, merged, or left out altogether (such that not all described acts or events are necessary for the practice of the methods and algorithms). Moreover, in certain embodiments, acts or events can be performed concurrently, such as through multi-threaded processing, interrupt processing, or multiple processors or processor cores or on other parallel architectures, rather than sequentially. In addition, different tasks or processes can be performed by different machines and computing systems that can function together.
The various illustrative logical blocks, modules, methods, and algorithm processes and sequences described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein can be implemented as electronic hardware, computer software, or combinations of both. To clearly illustrate this interchangeability of hardware and software, various illustrative components, blocks, modules, and process actions have been described above generally in terms of their functionality. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the overall system. The described functionality can be implemented in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of this document.
The various illustrative logical blocks and modules described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein can be implemented or performed by a machine, such as a general purpose processor, a processing device, a computing device having one or more processing devices, a digital signal processor (DSP), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or other programmable logic device, discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, or any combination thereof designed to perform the functions described herein. A general purpose processor and processing device can be a microprocessor, but in the alternative, the processor can be a controller, microcontroller, or state machine, combinations of the same, or the like. A processor can also be implemented as a combination of computing devices, such as a combination of a DSP and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in conjunction with a DSP core, or any other such configuration.
Embodiments of the constant-power pairwise panning upmixing system 300 and method described herein are operational within numerous types of general purpose or special purpose computing system environments or configurations. In general, a computing environment can include any type of computer system, including, but not limited to, a computer system based on one or more microprocessors, a mainframe computer, a digital signal processor, a portable computing device, a personal organizer, a device controller, a computational engine within an appliance, a mobile phone, a desktop computer, a mobile computer, a tablet computer, a smartphone, and appliances with an embedded computer, to name a few.
Such computing devices can be typically be found in devices having at least some minimum computational capability, including, but not limited to, personal computers, server computers, hand-held computing devices, laptop or mobile computers, communications devices such as cell phones and PDA's, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, set top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, audio or video media players, and so forth. In some embodiments the computing devices will include one or more processors. Each processor may be a specialized microprocessor, such as a digital signal processor (DSP), a very long instruction word (VLIW), or other microcontroller, or can be conventional central processing units (CPUs) having one or more processing cores, including specialized graphics processing unit (GPU)-based cores in a multi-core CPU.
The process actions of a method, process, or algorithm described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein can be embodied directly in hardware, in a software module executed by a processor, or in any combination of the two. The software module can be contained in computer-readable media that can be accessed by a computing device. The computer-readable media includes both volatile and nonvolatile media that is either removable, non-removable, or some combination thereof. The computer-readable media is used to store information such as computer-readable or computer-executable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data. By way of example, and not limitation, computer readable media may comprise computer storage media and communication media.
Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, computer or machine readable media or storage devices such as Bluray discs (BD), digital versatile discs (DVDs), compact discs (CDs), floppy disks, tape drives, hard drives, optical drives, solid state memory devices, RAM memory, ROM memory, EPROM memory, EEPROM memory, flash memory or other memory technology, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tapes, magnetic disk storage, or other magnetic storage devices, or any other device which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by one or more computing devices.
A software module can reside in the RAM memory, flash memory, ROM memory, EPROM memory, EEPROM memory, registers, hard disk, a removable disk, a CD-ROM, or any other form of non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, media, or physical computer storage known in the art. An exemplary storage medium can be coupled to the processor such that the processor can read information from, and write information to, the storage medium. In the alternative, the storage medium can be integral to the processor. The processor and the storage medium can reside in an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC). The ASIC can reside in a user terminal. Alternatively, the processor and the storage medium can reside as discrete components in a user terminal.
The phrase “non-transitory” as used in this document means “enduring or long-lived”. The phrase “non-transitory computer-readable media” includes any and all computer-readable media, with the sole exception of a transitory, propagating signal. This includes, by way of example and not limitation, non-transitory computer-readable media such as register memory, processor cache and random-access memory (RAM).
Retention of information such as computer-readable or computer-executable instructions, data structures, program modules, and so forth, can also be accomplished by using a variety of the communication media to encode one or more modulated data signals, electromagnetic waves (such as carrier waves), or other transport mechanisms or communications protocols, and includes any wired or wireless information delivery mechanism. In general, these communication media refer to a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information or instructions in the signal. For example, communication media includes wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection carrying one or more modulated data signals, and wireless media such as acoustic, radio frequency (RF), infrared, laser, and other wireless media for transmitting, receiving, or both, one or more modulated data signals or electromagnetic waves. Combinations of the any of the above should also be included within the scope of communication media.
Further, one or any combination of software, programs, computer program products that embody some or all of the various embodiments of the post-encoding bitrate reduction system 100 and method described herein, or portions thereof, may be stored, received, transmitted, or read from any desired combination of computer or machine readable media or storage devices and communication media in the form of computer executable instructions or other data structures.
Embodiments of the constant-power pairwise panning upmixing system 300 and method described herein may be further described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, being executed by a computing device. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, and so forth, which perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. The embodiments described herein may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by one or more remote processing devices, or within a cloud of one or more devices, that are linked through one or more communications networks. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote computer storage media including media storage devices. Still further, the aforementioned instructions may be implemented, in part or in whole, as hardware logic circuits, which may or may not include a processor.
Conditional language used herein, such as, among others, “can,” “might,” “may,” “e.g.,” and the like, unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or states. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or states are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without author input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or states are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment. The terms “comprising,” “including,” “having,” and the like are synonymous and are used inclusively, in an open-ended fashion, and do not exclude additional elements, features, acts, operations, and so forth. Also, the term “or” is used in its inclusive sense (and not in its exclusive sense) so that when used, for example, to connect a list of elements, the term “or” means one, some, or all of the elements in the list.
While the above detailed description has shown, described, and pointed out novel features as applied to various embodiments, it will be understood that various omissions, substitutions, and changes in the form and details of the devices or algorithms illustrated can be made without departing from the spirit of the disclosure. As will be recognized, certain embodiments of the inventions described herein can be embodied within a form that does not provide all of the features and benefits set forth herein, as some features can be used or practiced separately from others.
Moreover, although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/447,516 filed on Jul. 30, 2014 entitled “MATRIX DECODER WITH CONSTANT-POWER PAIRWISE PANNING”, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/860,024 filed Jul. 30, 2013, entitled “MATRIX DECODER WITH CONSTANT-POWER PAIRWISE PANNING”, the entire contents of both which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61860024 | Jul 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14447516 | Jul 2014 | US |
Child | 15149458 | US |