This disclosure relates generally to oil and gas well logging tools. More particularly, this disclosure relates to tools for measuring rock formation porosity through the use of gamma ray signals created when neutrons emitted by a pulsed neutron source interact with the materials surrounding the tool and with the material of the tool itself. This disclosure relates to a neutron porosity tool that uses a single gamma ray detector covered with neutron absorbing material like B10 isotope for the porosity measurements.
In petroleum and hydrocarbon production, it may be desirable to know the porosity of the subterranean formation that contains the hydrocarbon reserves. Knowledge of porosity may be used in calculating the oil saturation and thus the volume of oil in-place within the reservoir. Knowledge of accurate porosity values is particularly useful in older oil wells where porosity information derived from open hole porosity logs is either insufficient or nonexistent. This porosity information is useful in determining remaining oil in-place and in determining whether the remaining oil in-place justifies applying enhanced recovery methods. Porosity information is also helpful in identifying up-hole gas zones and differentiating between low porosity liquid and gas.
A variety of tools exists which allow the porosity of the reservoir to be determined. Most of these tools are effective in determining the porosity of the reservoir around the wellbore in which the tool is run. There are devices that work with cased holes as well as uncased holes. A common feature of these prior art tools is the necessity of having at least two neutron detectors. The present disclosure is directed towards a tool in which a single gamma ray detector is used for estimating formation porosity.
One embodiment of the disclosure is a method of evaluating an earth formation. The method includes: obtaining an indication of a porosity of the earth formation using gamma rays measured by a single gamma ray detector, where the earth formation has been irradiated by a neutron source and the gamma ray detector is coated with a neutron absorbing material.
Another embodiment of the disclosure is an apparatus configured to evaluate a subterranean formation from within a wellbore. The apparatus includes: a pulsed neutron source configured to be conveyed in the wellbore and irradiate the earth formation; a single gamma ray detector coated with a neutron absorbing material and configured to measure gamma rays resulting from the irradiation; and a processor configured to use the measured gamma rays for obtaining an indication of a porosity of the earth formation.
Another embodiment of the disclosure is a non-transitory computer-readable medium product having instructions thereon that when read by a processor cause the processor to execute a method, the method comprising obtaining an indication of a porosity of an earth formation using gamma rays measured by a single gamma ray detector, where the earth formation has been irradiated by a neutron source and the single gamma ray detector is coated with a neutron absorbing material.
The present disclosure is best understood with reference to the accompanying figures in which like numerals refer to like elements and in which:
The system shown in
The outputs from XLS, LS and SS detectors 17, 14, and 16 may be coupled to detector board 22, which may amplify these outputs and compares them to an adjustable discriminator level for passage to channel generator 26. Channel generator 26 may be a component of multi-channel scale (MCS) section 24 which further includes spectrum accumulator 28 and central processor unit (CPU) 30. MCS section 24 accumulates spectral data in spectrum accumulator 28 by using a channel number generated by channel generator 26 and associated with a pulse as an address for a memory location. After all of the channels have had their data accumulated, CPU 30 reads the spectrum, or collection of data from all of the channels, and sends the data to modem 32 which is coupled to cable 20 for transmission of the data over a communication link to the surface apparatus. Channel generator 26 also generates synchronization signals which control the pulse frequency of source 18, and further functions of CPU 30 in communicating control commands which define certain operational parameters of instrument 12 including the discriminator levels of detector board 22, and the filament current and accelerator voltage supplied to source 18 by power supply 15.
The surface apparatus may include master controller 34 coupled to cable 20 for recovery of data from instrument 12 and for transmitting command signals to instrument 12. Master controller 34 may include a processor. In some embodiments, the processor may be separate from the master controller 34. The surface apparatus may include depth controller 36 which may be configured to provide signals to master controller 34 indicating the movement of instrument 12 within well 10. The system operator may access the master controller 34 to allow the system operator to provide selected input for the logging operation to be performed by the system. Display unit 40 and mass storage unit 44 are also coupled to master controller 34. The primary purpose of display unit 40 is to provide visual indications of the generated logging data as well as systems operations data. Storage unit 44 is provided for storing logging data generated by the system as well as for retrieval of stored data and system operation programs. A satellite link may be provided to send data and or receive instructions from a remote location.
In a well logging operation such as is illustrated by
In addition, as would be known to those versed in the art, many of the functions of the components described with reference to
Turning now to
where
R—count rate ratio;
CRXX—count rate;
FTNXX—flux of neutrons passing through the detector;
n(ZX)—concentration of thermal neutrons in point ZX; and
f (ρ)—function of formation porosity.
Turning now to
where the total value of the reaction cross-section σ is for the thermal neutrons with energy En=0.025 eV.
The reaction (2) causes the emission of gamma rays with Eγ=0.478 MeV. As a result, capture gamma ray spectrum measured by the detector 314 of such a tool contains the “boron” peak at ˜0.5 MeV which is the superposition of two peaks—the boron peak itself due to gamma rays produced by reaction (2) with energy Eγ=0.478 MeV and the peak which is due to gamma rays with Eγ=0.511 MeV generated by positrons born inside of the detector (see
The intensity of boron peak itself, the component of the observed “B” peak which is due to 0.478 MeV gamma rays, is proportional to thermal neutron flux passing through the surface of gamma ray detector covered with B10 isotope:
IB=S(Eγ=0.478 MeV)FTN˜n(Z0) (3)
where S is gamma ray detector response function. The intensity of observed peak in the spectrum (“B” peak) can be described by:
I“B”=IB+I0.511 (4)
where I0.511 is the intensity of the component which is due to 0.511 MeV gamma rays. The intensity of this component can be described by:
where γ({right arrow over (r)},Eγ″) is the distribution of gamma rays in the tool-borehole-formation (TBF) system formed by the interaction of thermal neutrons of the thermal neutron cloud formed in TBF system by the pulse of fast neutrons emitted by pulsed neutron generator with the material of TBF system;
σpp(Eγ′) is the probability for gamma ray which reaches the detector with energy Eγ′ to create electron-positron pair;
CT(Eγ″,Eγ′,{right arrow over (r)})=∫d{right arrow over (r)}′ exp(−σγ({right arrow over (r)}′)r′)exp(−σComp(Eγ″→Eγ′,{right arrow over (r)}′)({right arrow over (r)}−r{right arrow over (r)}′)) is gamma array flux created by Compton scattering in the system; σγ({right arrow over (r)}′) is the gamma ray adsorption coefficient of the system; and
σComp is gamma ray Compton scattering coefficient of the system.
For (5) the center of the coordination system coincides with the center of the gamma ray detector.
The intensity of hydrogen peak is described by:
Here γ({right arrow over (r)},Eγ=2.2 MeV) is the flux of gamma rays with Eγ=2.2 MeV born in the point {right arrow over (r)} due to capture interaction of thermal neutrons with hydrogen nuclei in this point. This parameter is proportional to the concentration of thermal neutrons n ({right arrow over (r)}) at the same point:
γ({right arrow over (r)},Eγ=2.2 MeV)=σcapturenH({right arrow over (r)})n({right arrow over (r)}) (7)
where nH({right arrow over (r)}) is the distribution of hydrogen nuclei in TBF system.
To a zero-order approximation, assuming that gamma ray scattering properties of TBF system changes with {right arrow over (r)} much slower than n({right arrow over (r)}) does, the relative ratio of the intensities of “boron” and hydrogen peaks in the capture gamma ray spectrum measured by tool shown in
where A, B, and C are some constants. Because the distribution of thermal neutrons in TBF system is defined by the formation porosity, the following expression is valid:
RBtoH=g(ρ) (9)
where g(ρ)—function dependent on formation porosity which could have as parameters such parameters of the TBF system as lithology of formation, borehole diameter, and others. Hence by measuring the capture gamma ray spectrum using tool illustrated in
Turning now to
To demonstrate the validity of the method described above, measurements were made in blocks of limestone and sandstone using the tool shown in
Similar results have been obtained from measurements in sandstones. Shown in
Intensities of “B” and H peaks were calculated by integrating the spectral intensity in the channel intervals (41;56) (B peak) and (194;222) (H peak) for SS detector and (39;54) (B peak) and (190;215) (H peak) for LS detector and subtracting the background intensity. Background was approximated by the straight line connecting the spectral points at the edges of the corresponding peak intervals. For the data presented in
The experimental results shown in
Turning now to
The processing of the measurements made in wireline applications may be done by a surface processor 34, by a downhole processor, or at a remote location. The data acquisition may be controlled at least in part by the downhole electronics. Implicit in the control and processing of the data is the use of a computer program on a suitable machine readable medium that enables the processors to perform the control and processing. The machine readable medium may include ROMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, Flash Memories and Optical disks.
While the foregoing disclosure is directed to the specific embodiments of the disclosure, various modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. It is intended that all such variations within the scope and spirit of the appended claims be embraced by the foregoing disclosure.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/500,039, filed on 22 Jun. 2011, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3413470 | Allen, Jr. et al. | Nov 1968 | A |
3772513 | Hall et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
4122339 | Smith, Jr. et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4604522 | Arnold | Aug 1986 | A |
6373066 | Penn | Apr 2002 | B1 |
7282704 | Guo | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7365307 | Stoller et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7548817 | Hassan et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7615741 | Jacobi et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7623968 | Griffiths et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
20100019138 | Galford et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20130206972 | Zhou et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Heisig, G., et al., “Downhole Diagnosis of Drilling Dynamics Data Provides New Level Drilling Process Control to Driller,” SPE 49206, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, LA (Sep. 27-30, 1998). |
Ellis, Darwin V., et al.,“Well Logging for Earth Scientists” Springer 2d Edition (2007), pp. 351-382). |
Inanc, F., et al., “Physical Basis, Modeling and Interpretation of a New Gas Saturation Measurement for Cased Wells,” SPWLA 50th Annual Logging Symposium (Jun. 21-24, 2009). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120326048 A1 | Dec 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61500039 | Jun 2011 | US |