1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to analysis of print media in document processing devices. More particularly, the present invention relates to the identification of a print media characteristic, namely a media stiffness characteristic.
2. State of the Art
A media transport system transports media through a media processing system such as a printer, photocopier, scanner, fax, or other image device. In a media transport system, a media entity such as a sheet is picked from a stack or tray and moved through a media path using one or more sets of rollers, channels or pathways. The media is then positioned and placed in alignment with an imaging system of the media processing system for either imprinting of an image to the media or the evaluation of an image already resident upon the media, depending upon the functionality associated with the media processing system. For an optimal imaging process to occur, it is desirable for the media to be properly aligned with respect to the imaging system.
Several factors may contribute to the misalignment of the media in the media path. One source of misalignment occurs during a media picking phase wherein a piece of media such as a sheet is picked from a stack of media and begins conveyance down a media path in a skewed or misaligned manner. Initially, media is typically removed from a media stack or tray using a set of rollers known as pick rollers. Pick rollers exert forces upon the media for both separating the media from adjacent media and for directing the media into the media path. Because of unpredictable frictional forces as well as misalignment associated with a stack or tray of media, the media generally enters the media path in a skewed orientation.
One approach for removing a majority of skew from media once in the paper path utilizes a concept known as media buckling. In a media buckling process, a roller assembly, such as pick rollers or other media path rollers, exerts a driving force which causes a buckle or arching of the media as the leading edge of the media encounters either a subsequent set of stopped rollers, such as registration rollers, or some other blockage that prevents the leading edge of the media from continuing down the media path. Once the initial or leading edge of the media has been stopped and force continues to be applied to the trailing edge, a buckling or arching of the media occurs which results in an asymmetric arching of the media allowing the leading edge to square-up with the blocking orientation device at the leading edge of the media.
Prior attempts at controlling the buckling process have been met with varying degrees of success. Some attempts utilize a one-size-fits-all approach for generation of a media buckle. However, those of skill in the art appreciate that buckling profiles are a function of the stiffness of the media being processed. Prior attempts at removing skew from stiff media by using the buckling process have resulted in the wedging and undesirable over-advancement of the stiff media into the stopped rollers rather than the formation of a skew-removing buckling profile. Therefore, for at least stiff media, additional skew is injected into the media path due to wedging of the stiffer media into stopped registration rollers resulting in an undesirable advancement of the media along the media path. This wedging of stiff media into the stopped registration rollers results not only in media damage but in misalignment of the media in the paper path, thereby causing misalignment of other processes on the media at subsequent stages in the media path. Accordingly, there is a need for another approach for handling skew across a broad spectrum of media stiffnesses.
According to the present invention, media processing devices exhibit improved performance if the stiffness of the media is determined, thereby allowing for adaptations of processes, including adaptation of media transport processes and imaging processes. During the media transport phase, the media transport system picks a piece of media from media storage. Due to the existing tolerance in the media orientation and variations in forces associated with the media picking process, as well as other factors, the media would otherwise arrive at the imaging process in an unacceptably skewed orientation. Such skew is minimized by analysis of the stiffness of the media and tailoring of the media alignment processes according to the derived media stiffness information. Additional imaging processes may accordingly be modified in response to the derived stiffness characteristic of the media.
According to one aspect of the invention, media sensors are disposed in the media transport path and are located on one side of a cantilever pivot, also in the media path. The picked media is placed across the cantilevered pivot such that a determined length of the media is allowed to unsupportedly extend from the cantilevered pivot into a region monitored by the media sensors and to freely deflect according to the inherent stiffness of the media under the weight of that portion of media. Various embodiments for cantilevering media are presented.
The sensors measure an amount of deflection of the media for calculating and processing into a corresponding media stiffness measurement. According to one embodiment of the present invention, the media stiffness measurement is derived from indexing a lookup table which correlates media deflection measurements into media stiffness measurements and further into corresponding process adjustments. According to another embodiment of the present invention, multiple deflection measurements may be taken with different lengths of the media cantilevering into the sensors. These multiple deflection measurements are used to correlate respective media stiffness measurements.
According to another aspect of the invention, the media realignment process is modified or adjusted according to identified stiffness of the media. In one embodiment, the media alignment process includes advancing the media using a set of trailing rollers with the leading edge of the media encountering a pair of stopped registration rollers. The trailing edge of the media is further advanced while the leading edge remains stopped. The asymmetric advancement of the leading and trailing edges creates a bulging or buckling of the media. The buckling profile of the media facilitates the removal of media misalignment skew through the parallel alignment of the leading edge with the nip of the registration rollers. The amount of over-advancement of the trailing edge is controlled according to the derived media stiffness measurement. By tailoring the buckling skew-removal profile according to the media stiffness, the removal of media skew may be maximized. According to another aspect of the invention, the media stiffness measurements are also used to modify imaging processes.
During traversal of media path 24, media 20 is subjected to a media stiffness evaluation phase or process 26 in order to determine a relative stiffness associated with the media. Knowledge about a media's stiffness allows modifications in subsequent processing steps. Media stiffness evaluation phase 26, while more exhaustively described in subsequent figures, generally provides an environment wherein media 20′ is pulled along the media path by rollers or other motional devices 28. In order to provide adjustments in response to the media stiffness, a media stiffness evaluation phase facilitates the free suspension of one end of the media, thereby allowing the suspended end to deflect or sag. As illustrated, rollers 28 provide a fulcrum for media 20′ to cantilever or sag into the field of view of a stiffness sensor 30. Media 20′, while in the sensory field of stiffness sensor 30, undergoes a reading by stiffness sensor 30 corresponding to a stiffness factor associated with media 20′. Process control signals are then generated by stiffness sensor 30 and sent to subsequent media processes for adjustment and modification as needed. It should be appreciated that gravity is employed as the deflecting forces; however, other forces may also be applied as the deflecting force and are contemplated to be within the scope of the present invention.
Media realignment phase 32 is a subsequent phase in media transport phase 12 wherein media 20″ moves into realignment through the removal of skew of media 20″ in relationship to registration rollers 34. Skew is removed from media 20″ by the generation of a buckle in the media which occurs when rollers 36 continue advancing the trailing edge of media 20″ while the leading edge of media 20″ encounters the stopped registration rollers 34. In the present invention, sensor information derived from stiffness sensor 30 is utilized to control the amount of force applied by rollers 36 on media 20″, thus preventing any further exacerbation of the skew or misalignment of the media in the media path due to an inappropriate amount of force being applied by rollers 36 to media 20″. Once skew has been removed and alignment of the media has been improved, media 20′″ is thereafter presented to imaging process 14 for further processing. Imaging of media 20 is improved because of the enhanced alignment of the media with the imaging process.
Media stiffness sensor 30 is comprised of sensors for detecting the presence of media 20 and for quantifying the amount of deflection associated with the stiffness of media 20.
Other processing modifications in addition to buckling modifications also result in improved performance by a media processing system. Some examples of other parameters that can be monitored and adjusted in response to the determination of the media thickness include: fuser temperature modifications in response to different media types; fuser pressure modification also in response to different media types; paper path roller pressure adjustments for optimal performance since thicker media tends to slip more in the paper path, especially when turning corners; output bin routing for stiff media types that do not lend themselves to turning corners inside the paper path; roller wear monitoring by tracking the quantities of various types of media that have been processed by the system; stapling capabilities can be better tracked since the quantity of sheets to be stapled can be determined according to the media thickness; and various other parameters that may be altered based on the media thickness.
Similarly,
While two typical embodiments for facilitating the cantilever action of media 20 into a sensory field or region have been illustrated, it is appreciated that other embodiments are also contemplated which facilitate the extension of media into a sensor region and are also contemplated to be within the scope of the present invention.
An optional query step 86 facilitates multiple measurements of the media deflection as opposed to a single measurement. If multiple measurements are implemented, then step 84 is repeated for the gathering of subsequent deflection measurements. Otherwise, query step 86 is either bypassed or, upon the completion of the desired quantity of samples, processing passes to step 88 wherein the stiffness is calculated. As briefly introduced above, stiffnesses are calculated from the quantity of sensors triggered by the media deflection. Using the measured media stiffness, additional media characteristics and identities may be determined by referencing a lookup table that correlates media stiffness to unique media types. Characteristics such as surface roughness, grain orientation and others can be determined to optimize the imaging process.
In a step 90, control signals are generated for adjusting the media processing. Such signals may include roller force as applied by buckle rollers 36 including the amount of rotation of the buckle rollers for use in forming a media buckle. Additional control and status signals, such as signals 58 of
Although preferred embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, various alternatives, modifications, and equivalents may be used. Therefore, the foregoing description should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention which is defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4365151 | Fasig et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4484070 | Inoue | Nov 1984 | A |
4614867 | Lane | Sep 1986 | A |
4985636 | Fukui et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5053616 | Trett | Oct 1991 | A |
5075543 | Courtney | Dec 1991 | A |
5201424 | Hain | Apr 1993 | A |
5371353 | Shibuya | Dec 1994 | A |
5466079 | Quintana | Nov 1995 | A |
5564848 | Quintana | Oct 1996 | A |
5775690 | Quesnel et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5934140 | Jackson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6364556 | Barbera et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6701098 | Pyke et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
20030042443 | Pechan et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040046315 | Jewell | Mar 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040084643 A1 | May 2004 | US |