The present application relates generally to medical devices and in particular to a medical device including a scanned beam unit with operational control features.
Imaging devices may be used to provide visualization of a site on or within a patient, or in other areas of use. One such device is described in U.S. Patent Publication Number 2005/0020926; corresponding to U.S. application Ser. No. 10/873,540, filed on Jun. 21, 2004, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. In such systems a scanned beam imaging system may utilize a radiation source or sources. The radiation is scanned onto or across an area of interest by an oscillating mirror. The radiation is reflected, scattered, refracted or otherwise perturbed by the illuminated area. The perturbed radiation is then gathered/sensed and converted into electrical signals that are processed to generate a viewable image.
In an aspect, a method of controlling a medical device is provided. The method includes generating a beam of radiation using a radiation source assembly. The beam of radiation is directed toward a distal end of the medical device using an optical fiber. The beam of radiation is directed onto an area of interest by scanning the reflector in a scanning pattern, the reflector receiving the beam of radiation from the optical fiber. Radiation is collected from the area of interest using a collector to generate a signal for use in producing a viewable image. A loss of scan condition of the reflector is detected automatically by a control system.
In another aspect, a medical device includes a radiation source assembly including a radiation source configured to generate a beam of radiation. An optical fiber directs the beam from the radiation source assembly toward a distal end of the medical device. A reflector receives the beam from the optical fiber. The reflector is configured to direct the beam onto an area of interest by scanning in a scanning pattern. A collector is arranged and configured to receive radiation from the area of interest to generate a signal for use in producing a viewable image. A filter is responsive to signal components corresponding to scanning frequencies. The filter is configured to produce an output based on the signal components. A comparator is adapted to provide an indication when the output of the filter exceeds or is below a predetermined limit.
In another aspect, a medical device includes a radiation source assembly including a radiation source configured to generate a beam of radiation. An optical fiber directs the beam from the radiation source assembly toward a distal end of the medical device. A reflector receives the beam from the optical fiber. The reflector is configured to direct the beam onto an area of interest by scanning in a scanning pattern. A comb motor drive is operatively connected to the reflector for driving the reflector in the scanning pattern. An impedance meter is connected to comb motor drive. The impedance meter is configured to determine an instantaneous impedance to the motor comb drive for use in determining if the reflector is scanning.
In another aspect, a medical device includes a radiation source assembly including a radiation source configured to generate a beam of radiation. An optical fiber directs the beam from the radiation source assembly toward a distal end of the medical device along a path defined by the optical fiber. A reflector receives the beam from the optical fiber. The reflector is configured to direct the beam onto an area of interest by scanning in a scanning pattern. A collector is arranged and configured to receive radiation from the area of interest to generate a signal for use in producing a viewable image. A beam splitter is arranged and configured to separate reflected radiation from the path traveling through the optical fiber from the distal end of the medical device toward a proximal end of the medical device.
In another aspect, a medical device includes a radiation source assembly including a radiation source configured to generate a beam for treatment of a medical condition. An optical fiber directs the beam from the radiation source assembly toward a distal end of the medical device. A reflector receives the beam from the optical fiber. The reflector is configured to direct the beam onto an area of interest by scanning in a scanning pattern. A means for determining if the reflector is scanning is provided.
In another aspect, a medical device includes a radiation source assembly including a radiation source configured to generate a beam for treatment of a medical condition. An optical fiber directs the beam from the radiation source assembly toward a distal end of the medical device. A reflector receives the beam from the optical fiber. The reflector is configured to direct the beam onto an area of interest by scanning in a scanning pattern. A control system is configured to control the radiation source by detecting an insertion or retraction of the medical device into a body cavity.
The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and the drawings, and from the claims.
Before explaining the several expressions of embodiments of the present invention in detail, it should be noted that each is not limited in its application or use to the details of construction and arrangement of parts illustrated in the accompanying drawings and description. The illustrative expressions of embodiments of the invention may be implemented or incorporated in other embodiments, variations and modifications, and may be practiced or carried out in various ways. Furthermore, unless otherwise indicated, the terms and expressions employed herein have been chosen for the purpose of describing the illustrative embodiments of the present invention for the convenience of the reader and are not for the purpose of limiting the invention.
It is further understood that any one or more of the following-described expressions of embodiments, examples, etc. can be combined with any one or more of the other following-described expressions of embodiments, examples, etc.
As shown in
The scanning unit 12 includes a housing 16 which receives a source fiber 18 therein. In the illustrated embodiment the housing 16 is generally cylindrical (see
Referring back to
In the illustrated embodiment, the reflector 26 includes a central aperture 30 that is positioned to allow the beam 22 to pass therethrough. However, the reflector 26 and scanning unit 12 can take any of a variety of shapes and configurations besides that shown herein. For example, rather than including a central aperture 30 that allows the beam 22 to pass therethrough, the beam 22 may be laterally offset from the reflector 26, and guided to the reflector 26 by another mirror/reflector.
After passing through the aperture 30 of the reflector 26, the beam 22 approaches an optical element 32 that is positioned at a distal end of the scanning unit 12. The optical element 32 can be generally hemispherical and is typically referred to as a dome. However, the shape, curvature, contour, and surface treatment of the optical element 32 may vary depending on the desired application/use of the scanning unit 12 and the desired optical properties of the optical element 32. The optical element 32 may form a hermetic seal with the housing 16 to protect the internal elements of the scanning unit 12 from the surrounding environment.
The optical element 32 may include a reflecting surface 34 on its inner surface. The reflecting surface 34 may be directly deposited on the inner surface of the optical element 32, or integrated into the optical element 32, or can take the form of a separate and discrete element coupled to the optical element 32. After the beam 22 passes through the aperture 30 of the reflector 26, the beam 22 impinges upon the reflecting surface 34 which reflects the beam 22 and re-directs the beam 22 toward the reflector 26. The inner surface of the optical element 32 and/or the reflecting surface 34 may also shape the beam 22 as desired due to the shape or curvature of the reflecting surface 34. If the beam 22 is laterally offset from the center of the scanning unit 12 in the arrangement briefly described above, the reflecting surface 34 on the optical element 32 may be omitted.
The reflector 26 may be independently oscillatable/movable about two orthogonal axes, such as axes 38, 40 shown in
The inner support structure 42 may have a pair of opposed comb structures 50 that are interleaved with comb structures 52 of the reflector 26. Similarly, the outer support structure 46 may have a pair of opposed comb structures 54 that are interleaved with comb structures 56 of the inner support structure 42. A voltage can be applied to one or both comb structures 50, 52 which causes the reflector 26 to pivot about arms 44/axis 40. Similarly, a voltage can be applied to one or both comb structures 54, 56 to cause the reflector 26 to pivot about arms 48/axis 38. The voltages can be applied by a controller 58 to thereby control movement and position of the reflector 26.
It should be noted that the arrangement of
The range of motion of the reflector 26 can be selected as desired, but in one embodiment the reflector 26 is pivotable about the axis 38 at least about 60 degrees, and the reflector 26 is pivotable about the axis 40 at least about 60 degrees, or in another case at least about 40 degrees (with all angles being full angle values representing the full range of motion of the reflector 26). The reflector 26 may guide the beam 22 to define a field of view or field of scan, which is the angular extent of the area illuminated by the scanned beam. It should be noted that the displayed image may be less than the field of view.
In one embodiment the reflector 26 is moved such that the reflector 26 has a significantly higher frequency about one axis than about the other axis. For example, in one embodiment the reflector 26 is moved such that it has a frequency about the axis 40 that is at least about fifteen times greater, up to about 600 times or even greater, than the frequency of oscillation about the axis 38. In one embodiment the reflector 26 may have a frequency of about 19 kHz about the axis 40, and about 60 Hz about the axis 38.
The reflector 26 may be moved about each axis 38, 40 in a reciprocating motion having a velocity profile that is generally sinusoidal to provide a bi-sinusoidal scan pattern. However, the velocity profile need not necessarily be at or close to sinusoidal. Furthermore, the reflector 26 may be oscillated at or close to resonant frequency about each axis 38, 40 (i.e. in a dual resonant manner). However, the frequency of oscillations can be at nearly any desired value to allow the reflected beam 22 to scan across the illuminated area 14 in the desired manner (such as in a progressive scan pattern). For example,
The scanning unit 10 includes a collector 64, which collects/senses radiation emitted by the scanning unit 12 that is returned from the illuminated area 14. In the embodiment of
The collector 64 may take any of a variety of forms, and in one embodiment includes a plurality of small diameter, multimode collecting fibers. The ends of the fibers may be polished and arranged in a generally planar manner (or otherwise) to define an aperture. When the reflector 26/scanning unit 12 directs radiation 22 at the area 14, returned radiation impinges on the aperture, and the collecting fibers then conduct the received radiation to a radiation detector assembly 64. The radiation detector assembly 66/controller 58 may be operatively coupled to an image processor 67, which is in turn coupled to a display device 68 (such as a display screen, television screen, monitor, etc.) that can display a visual representation (a video image) of the illuminated area 14 based upon data provided by the collector 64.
Referring also back to
The housing 16 may constitute or include an elongate shaft (which can be either rigid or flexible) that is insertable into the body of a patient. The radiation source 20, controller 58, radiation detector assembly 66, image processor 67 and display device are 68 typically not insertable into the patient or carried in the housing 16, but are instead typically components positioned outside the body and accessible for use and viewing.
In certain cases, it may be desired to provide a reference mark 80 or marker positioned to reflect the beam of radiation after the beam reflects off of the reflector 26, but before the beam impinges upon the area of interest 14. For example, as shown in
In the embodiment of
In some embodiments, it may be desirable to provide one or more automated systems for controlling radiation output, for example, based on location of the scanning unit 12 and/or operating conditions of the reflector 26. Additionally, organizations like the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) provide standards that apply to manufacturers and users of laser devices, for example, setting forth eye and skin Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) values. The MPE is the maximum power or energy density (in J/cm2 or W/cm2) exposure to a light source determined by one or more of these organizations. For example, if the scanning unit 12 is not located within the desired body cavity, it may be desirable to prevent unintended output of certain power levels until the scanning unit is within the desired body cavity. As another example, if the reflector 26 is not scanning properly, it may be desirable to detect this condition to prevent output of unintended doses of radiation.
Referring again to
Referring to
It should be noted that the magnetically actuated switch/sensors can have a limited range of detection of the magnet. For example, the switch/sensors may be capable of detecting the magnet over a range of about ⅛ to 1 inch, such as about ¼ inch. The state of the switch may be stored, for example, in memory or in another component such as a latch.
While magnetically actuated sensors are described above, other sensor types may be used, such as impedance sensors, capacitive sensors, etc. Additionally, mechanical approaches may be utilized such as a ratcheting system in combination with a magnetic switch, where the ratcheting system temporarily locks the magnetic switch in a particular state as the switch is passed by the magnetic field. In certain implementations, a magnetically latching device may assume the first state upon passing the magnet 75 in one direction (e.g., an insertion) and assume the second state when passing the magnet in another direction (e.g., a retraction). In certain embodiments, multiple magnetically actuated devices may be employed for backup and robustness. In some embodiments, the system 71, 85 may be calibrated, such that when the scanning assembly 10 is turned on, it is assumed the scanning unit 12 is outside the intended cavity and high power is not enabled by default. A user override may be provided and used to enable high power manually.
While the above description relates to determining if the scanning unit 12 is located within the desired cavity or enclosure, it may be desirable to determine whether or not the reflector 26 is scanning properly. A loss of scan condition of the reflector 26 can result in unintended radiation doses being delivered to tissue. Various systems may be utilized to detect a loss of motion condition of the reflector 26. As will be noted below, some systems may use the reference mark, however, other systems may not. In some embodiments, the reference mark 80 may be used because the image processor 67 continuously monitors the received data stream for the characteristic signature of the reference mark 80, a persistent lack of such signature can imply that the reflector 26 is no longer moving as intended (i.e., a loss of scan condition is present). In such event, the radiation source 20 can be commanded to terminate emissions of the radiation beam.
Referring now to
The system 100 includes a filter 102 that is used to filter the signals from the radiation detector assembly 66, for example, prior to subjecting the signals to any nonlinear processing. In some embodiments, the filter 102 is a bandpass filter that passes frequencies within a certain range and rejects frequencies outside that range. For example, a low end of the range may be set above frequencies resulting from manual movement of the scanning unit 12 with the reflector 26 stationary (i.e., above frequencies one might expect from a user swinging the scanning unit 12 should the reflector 26 stop scanning). The upper end of the range may be set at least high enough pass frequencies associated with the system's highest resolution, which may be governed by the diameter of the beam and the electrical bandwidth of the detectors and amplifiers.
As another example, the filter 102 may be a comb filter that adds a delayed version of the signal to itself, causing constructive and destructive interference thereby providing a periodic response in frequency. The comb filter can have a large number of passbands that are centered on frequencies at which the spectrum has energy. In some embodiments, a bandpass filter (or separate low and high-stop filters) may also be included to filter out extreme low and high frequencies.
It should be noted that while the above system 100 looks for conditions expected when the reflector 26 is scanning, the system could look for conditions expected when the reflector is not scanning. For example, the filter 102 may be a low-pass filter that allows only those low frequencies to pass that would be expected should the reflector 26 stop scanning. Additionally, the reference mark 80 may be utilized for providing the spectral components. For example, the filter 102 may be a matched filter that responds maximally to the signal corresponding to the structure of the reference mark 80.
The system 100 includes a comparator 104 that compares the magnitudes of the output of the filter 102 against a limit. The limit may vary with operating conditions, scene, etc. When the output drops below the limit, then a qualifier 106 determines whether the reflector 26 has stopped scanning. In some embodiments, the qualifier 106 ignores brief low outputs, which may occur for reasons other than loss of scanning. If the qualifier 106 determines there is a loss of scan condition, then a laser disable input 108 (e.g., incorporated in the controller 58, source 20 or separate component) shuts down the radiation source. In some embodiments, the laser disable input 108 may operate a beam blocker, such as part of an external treatment system. In some embodiments, the processor 58 may include the comparator 104 and qualifier 106.
As one example, the processor 58 looks for temporal signal variations in the output of the detector 112. When the reflector 26 is oscillating, the change in scene reflectance as the scanned beam is reflected by varying tissue, structures and surface angle causes a variation of radiation reflected back into the source fiber 18 in a somewhat unpredictable way, however, the temporal frequency content will be different if the scanner is scanning versus stopped. Thus, if there are temporal signal variations at unexpected frequencies, then the frequency content can be analyzed to determine if the reflector is likely to be scanning. The absence of such temporal signal variations can be interpreted as an indication of a loss of scan condition and the radiation source 20 can be shut down in response.
As another example, the reference mark 80 could be applied to the dome surface at a position that is outside the area of interest and outside the acceptance angle of the collector, but at a position that can be interrogated by the outgoing beam 116. The reference mark 80 can provide a repeatable reflection signature as the mirror oscillates, which is recognized by the processor 58. The absence of this repeatable reflection signature can be interpreted as an indication of a loss of scan condition and the radiation source 20 can be shut down in response.
Referring now to
For large-scale disruption of operation such as a loss of a comb finger, jammed comb fingers, failed hinges, massive comb dislocation, etc. rapid changes in the impedance waveform (
The impedance of the comb drive 124 is dominated by the capacitance between the stationary and moveable portions of the comb drive. Generally, capacitance can be computed by
where ∈ is the dielectric constant of the material between the comb fingers, A is a measure of the area of the fingers and d is the distance between the comb fingers. For practical systems, the projected area between the fingers is a function of rotational angle between the stationary and moving portions of the comb drive and can be approximated, to the first order, as a cosine function with zero radians being defined as the angle between the stationary and moving portions when they are coplanar. The impedance is at its maximum value (minimum capacitance) when the reflector 26 is at its largest deflection angle and at its smallest when the reflector is centered (zero degrees). In the centered state, there is a dielectric separating the stationary and moving portions of the comb drive and this is the maximum capacitance (minimum impedance) position and it is non-zero. Currents can be measured, and thus impedance calculated for the conditions specified above.
Referring still to
The impedance monitoring element 130 may include low and high pass filters. The low pass filter is constructed to provide an affirmative output if the rate of change of the instantaneous impedance measurements are small, likely indicating a loss of scan condition. The high pass filter may be constructed to provide an affirmative output if the rate of change of the instantaneous impedance measurements are large, likely indicating normal operation.
Such filters may be implemented in analog (continuous time) or digital (discrete time) form. As examples of digital implementations, Finite Impulse Response (FIR) filters of Infinite Impulse Response (IIR) filters could be used. In some embodiments, a conversion of the data stream to the frequency domain using a Fourier Transform (DCTs of FFTs) and then looking for threshold values in appropriate frequency bins could be used.
One digital implementation of the impedance metering and monitoring functions of
While the present invention has been illustrated by a description of several expressions of embodiments, it is not the intention of the applicants to restrict or limit the spirit and scope of the appended claims to such detail. Numerous other variations, changes, and substitutions will occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention. It will be understood that the foregoing description is provided by way of example, and that other modifications may occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3758199 | Thaxter | Sep 1973 | A |
3959582 | Law et al. | May 1976 | A |
4082635 | Fritz et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4141362 | Wurster | Feb 1979 | A |
4313431 | Frank | Feb 1982 | A |
4379039 | Fujimoto et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4403273 | Nishioka | Sep 1983 | A |
4409477 | Carl | Oct 1983 | A |
4421382 | Doi et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4524761 | Hattori et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4527552 | Hattori | Jul 1985 | A |
4573465 | Sugiyama et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4576999 | Eckberg | Mar 1986 | A |
4597380 | Raif et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4643967 | Bryant | Feb 1987 | A |
4676231 | Hisazumi et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4760840 | Fournier, Jr. et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4803550 | Yabe et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4872458 | Kanehira et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4902083 | Wells | Feb 1990 | A |
4902115 | Takahashi | Feb 1990 | A |
4934773 | Becker | Jun 1990 | A |
4938205 | Nudelman | Jul 1990 | A |
5003300 | Wells | Mar 1991 | A |
5023905 | Wells et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5048077 | Wells et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5074860 | Gregory et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5078150 | Hara et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5163936 | Black et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5163945 | Ortiz et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5172685 | Nudelman | Dec 1992 | A |
5192288 | Thompson et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5200819 | Nudelman et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5200838 | Nudelman et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5207670 | Sinofsky | May 1993 | A |
5218195 | Hakamata | Jun 1993 | A |
5251025 | Cooper et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5251613 | Adair | Oct 1993 | A |
5269289 | Takehana et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5318024 | Kittrell et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5334991 | Wells et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5368015 | Wilk | Nov 1994 | A |
5370643 | Krivoshlykov et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5387197 | Smith et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5393647 | Neukermans et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5436655 | Hiyama et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5467104 | Furness, III et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5488862 | Neukermans et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5531740 | Black | Jul 1996 | A |
5545211 | An et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5552452 | Khadem et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5557444 | Melville et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5590660 | MacAulay et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596339 | Furness, III et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5608451 | Konno et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5629790 | Neukermans et al. | May 1997 | A |
5648618 | Neukermans et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5649952 | Lam | Jul 1997 | A |
5657165 | Karpman et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5658710 | Neukermans | Aug 1997 | A |
5659327 | Furness, III et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5694237 | Melville | Dec 1997 | A |
5701132 | Kollin et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5713891 | Poppas | Feb 1998 | A |
5728121 | Bimbo et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735792 | Vanden Hoek et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742419 | Dickensheets et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742421 | Wells et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751465 | Melville et al. | May 1998 | A |
5768461 | Svetkoff et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5797944 | Nobles et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5817061 | Goodwin et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823943 | Tomioka et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827176 | Tanaka et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827190 | Palcic et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5841553 | Neukermans | Nov 1998 | A |
5861549 | Neukermans et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867297 | Kiang et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5895866 | Neukermans et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903397 | Melville et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907425 | Dickensheets et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913591 | Melville | Jun 1999 | A |
5947930 | Schwemberger et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5969465 | Neukermans et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5969871 | Tidwell et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5982528 | Melville | Nov 1999 | A |
5982555 | Melville et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993037 | Tomioka et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995264 | Melville | Nov 1999 | A |
6007208 | Dickensheets et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008781 | Furness, III et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013025 | Bonne et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016440 | Simon et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6017356 | Frederick et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6017603 | Tokuda et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6024744 | Kese et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6043799 | Tidwell | Mar 2000 | A |
6044705 | Neukermans et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6046720 | Melville et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049407 | Melville | Apr 2000 | A |
6056721 | Shulze | May 2000 | A |
6057952 | Kubo et al. | May 2000 | A |
6059720 | Furusawa et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061163 | Melville | May 2000 | A |
6064779 | Neukermans et al. | May 2000 | A |
6069725 | Melville | May 2000 | A |
6086528 | Adair | Jul 2000 | A |
6086531 | Tomioka et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6088145 | Dickensheets et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097353 | Melville et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6122394 | Neukermans et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6139175 | Tomioka et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6140979 | Gerhard et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151167 | Melville | Nov 2000 | A |
6154305 | Dickensheets et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154321 | Melville et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157352 | Kollin et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166841 | Melville | Dec 2000 | A |
6172789 | Kino et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178346 | Amundson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179776 | Adams et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191761 | Melville et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192267 | Scherninski et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200595 | Motoyashiki et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204829 | Tidwell | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204832 | Melville et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207392 | Weiss et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210401 | Lai | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6220711 | Melville | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221068 | Fried et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229139 | Neukermans et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235017 | Jegorov et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243186 | Melville | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245590 | Wine et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256131 | Wine et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6257727 | Melville | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272907 | Neukermans et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6276798 | Gil et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281862 | Tidwell et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284185 | Tokuda et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6285489 | Helsel et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6285505 | Melville et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6288816 | Melville et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292287 | Fujinoki | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293911 | Imaizumi et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6294239 | Tokuda et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6294775 | Seibel et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6317103 | Furness, III et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323037 | Lauto et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324007 | Melville | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327493 | Ozawa et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331909 | Dunfield | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333110 | Barbera-Guillem | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338641 | Nicholls | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6352344 | Tidwell | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6353183 | Ott et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6362912 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364829 | Fulghum | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6369928 | Mandella et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6369953 | Melville et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6369954 | Berge et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370406 | Wach et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370422 | Richards-Kortum et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373995 | Moore | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384406 | Wine et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6388641 | Tidwell et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6392220 | Slater et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396461 | Lewis et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6414779 | Mandella et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6417502 | Stoner et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423956 | Mandella et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425900 | Knodel et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426013 | Neukermans et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6433907 | Lippert et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6435637 | Lyman | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441356 | Mandella et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445362 | Tegreene | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6447524 | Knodel et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6462770 | Cline et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6464363 | Nishioka et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6467345 | Neukermans et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470124 | Le Gargasson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477403 | Eguchi et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6478809 | Brotz | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485413 | Boppart et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6492962 | Melville et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6494578 | Plummer et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6503196 | Kehr et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510338 | Irion et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512622 | Wine et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6513939 | Fettig et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6515278 | Wine et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6515781 | Lewis et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6520972 | Peters | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6522444 | Mandella et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6525310 | Dunfield | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6527708 | Nakamura et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6529770 | Grimblatov | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6530698 | Kuhara et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535183 | Melville et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6535325 | Helsel et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6537211 | Wang et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538625 | Tidwell et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6545260 | Katashiro et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560028 | Melville et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6563105 | Seibel et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6563106 | Bowers et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6572606 | Kliewer et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6583117 | Owen et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6583772 | Lewis et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585642 | Christopher | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6603552 | Cline et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6608297 | Neukermans et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6639570 | Furness, III et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6639719 | Tegreene et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6650877 | Tarbouriech et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6653621 | Wine et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654158 | Helsel et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6661393 | Tegreene et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6674993 | Tarbouriech | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6685804 | Ikeda et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6687034 | Wine et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6689056 | Kilcoyne et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6699170 | Crocker et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6700552 | Kollin et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714331 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6734835 | Tidwell et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6736511 | Plummer et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6741884 | Freeman et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6749346 | Dickensheets et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6755536 | Tegreene et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6762867 | Lippert et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768588 | Urey | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6771001 | Mao et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6782748 | Weber et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6786382 | Hoffman | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6795221 | Urey | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6802809 | Okada | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6803561 | Dunfield | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6821245 | Cline et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6845190 | Smithwick et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6856436 | Brukilacchio et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6856712 | Fauver et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6879428 | Massieu | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6888552 | Debevec et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6894823 | Taylor et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6899675 | Cline et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902527 | Doguchi et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6905057 | Swayze et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6939364 | Soltz et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6957898 | Yu | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6967757 | Allen et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6974472 | Hong et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6975898 | Seibel et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6976994 | Ballou et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6978921 | Shelton, IV et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985271 | Yazdi et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6991602 | Nakazawa et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7005195 | Cheng et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7009634 | Iddan et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7013730 | Malametz | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7015956 | Luo et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7018401 | Hyodoh et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7023402 | Lewis et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7025777 | Moore | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7033348 | Alfano et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7035777 | Araki et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7061450 | Bright et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7065301 | Shastri et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066879 | Fowler et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7071594 | Yan et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7071931 | Tegreene et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7078378 | Owen et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7108656 | Fujikawa et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7112302 | Yoshimi et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7126903 | Feenstra et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7189961 | Johnston et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7190329 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7232071 | Lewis et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7271383 | Chee | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7391013 | Johnston et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
20010055462 | Seibel | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020015724 | Yang et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020024495 | Lippert et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020050956 | Gerhard et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020075284 | Rabb, III | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020088925 | Nestorovic et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020115922 | Waner et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020141026 | Wiklof et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020158814 | Bright et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163484 | Furness, III et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020167462 | Lewis et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020171776 | Tegreene et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020171937 | Tegreene et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030016187 | Melville et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030030753 | Kondo et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030032143 | Neff et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030034709 | Jerman | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030058190 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030086172 | Urey | May 2003 | A1 |
20030092995 | Thompson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030130562 | Barbato et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030142934 | Pan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030159447 | Sergio et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030214460 | Kovacs | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216729 | Marchitto et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040004585 | Brown et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040057103 | Bernstein | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040075624 | Tegreene et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040076390 | Dong Yang et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040085261 | Lewis et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040085617 | Helsel et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040087844 | Yen | May 2004 | A1 |
20040101822 | Wiesner et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040113059 | Kawano et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040118821 | Han et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040119004 | Wine et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122328 | Wang et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133786 | Tarbouriech | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040151466 | Crossman-Bosworth et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040155186 | Nestorovic et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040155834 | Wit et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040179254 | Lewis et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040196518 | Wine et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040223202 | Lippert et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225222 | Zeng et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236371 | McNally-Heintzelman et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240866 | Ramsbottom | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040252377 | Urey | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254474 | Seibel et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010787 | Tarbouriech | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050014995 | Amundson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050020877 | Ishihara et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050020926 | Wiklof et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050023356 | Wiklof et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030305 | Brown et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038322 | Banik | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050116038 | Lewis et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050162762 | Novak | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050187441 | Kawasaki et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050203343 | Kang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050240147 | Makower et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060010985 | Schneider | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060084867 | Tremblay et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060164330 | Bright et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060183246 | Wiesner et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195014 | Seibel et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060238774 | Lindner et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241562 | John et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060245971 | Burns et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060284790 | Tegreene et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070038119 | Chen et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070046778 | Ishihara et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070135770 | Hunt et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156021 | Morse et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070161876 | Bambot et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162093 | Porter et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167681 | Gill et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173707 | Mitra | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179366 | Pewzner et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070197874 | Ishihara | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070197875 | Osaka | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203413 | Frangioni | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213588 | Morishita et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070213618 | Li et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225695 | Mayer et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070238930 | Wiklof et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244365 | Wiklof | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260121 | Bakos et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070260273 | Cropper et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080058629 | Seibel et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3837248 | May 1990 | DE |
1139141 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1716802 | Nov 2006 | EP |
1747751 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1797813 | Jun 2007 | EP |
2007-244590 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2007-244680 | Sep 2007 | JP |
WO 9813720 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9918456 | Apr 1999 | WO |
9958930 | Nov 1999 | WO |
0013210 | Mar 2000 | WO |
0110322 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0160274 | Aug 2001 | WO |
02062239 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 03069380 | Aug 2003 | WO |
03088643 | Oct 2003 | WO |
03098918 | Nov 2003 | WO |
03101287 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2006020605 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006049787 | May 2006 | WO |
WO 2006055733 | May 2006 | WO |
2007041542 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007070831 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO 2007067163 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO 2007084915 | Jul 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090062659 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |