The present invention relates broadly to a memory gate stack structure, and to a method of fabricating a memory gate stack structure. The present invention will be described herein with reference to a gate stack for a memory transistor structure, however, it will be appreciated that the present invention does have broader applications. For example it may be applied in capacitor memory structures.
The applications of digital electronics have resulted in a demand for nonvolatile memories that are densely integrated, fast, and consume little power. The metal-oxide-nitride-oxide-semiconductor (MONOS) device is a promising candidate to replace existing forms of flash memory.
The MONOS structure has better charge retention than for example a polysilicon floating-gate type memory as the charges are stored in spatially isolated deep-level traps. Hence, a single defect in the tunnel oxide will generally not cause the discharge of the memory cell.
In MONOS device operation, electrons are involved in the program operation while both electrons and holes are involved in the erase operation. Hence threshold voltage control after erasing is difficult. If the electrical erase continues beyond a specified point, it will result in more positive charges in the silicon nitride (Si3N4) storage layer, resulting in over-erase.
A need exists, therefore, to provide a memory gate stack structure in which over-erase effects are reduced, while maintaining acceptable charge retention. In at least preferred embodiment, the present invention addresses that need.
In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a memory gate stack structure comprising:
a substrate layer comprising a silicon-based material,
a tunnel layer formed on the substrate layer,
a charge storage layer formed on the tunnel layer and comprising a hafnium-aluminium-oxide-based material,
a blocking layer formed on the charge storage layer, and
a gate layer formed on the blocking layer.
The charge storage layer may comprise (HfO2)x(Al2O3)1-x, with x in a range from about 0.4 to 0.95. In one embodiment, x is about 0.9.
The tunnel layer and/or the blocking layer may comprise silica-based materials.
In one embodiment, the tunnel layer comprises a silicon oxide formed by rapid thermal oxidation of the silicon-based material of the substrate layer.
The gate layer may comprise a metal, metal nitride, silicide or polysilicon materials. In one embodiment, the metal material may comprise HfN.
The memory gate stack structure may further comprise a capping layer on the gate layer. In one embodiment the capping layer may comprise TaN.
The blocking layer comprise (Si(OC2H5)4).
In accordance with a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of fabricating a memory gate stack structure, comprising the steps of:
providing a substrate layer comprising a silicon-based material,
forming a tunnel layer on the substrate layer,
forming a charge storage layer on the tunnel layer and comprising a hafnium-aluminium-oxide-based material,
forming a blocking layer on the charge storage layer, and
forming a gate layer on the blocking layer.
The charge storage layer may comprise (HfO2)x(Al2O3)1-x, with x in a range from about 0.4 to 0.95. In one embodiment, x is about 0.9.
The tunnel layer and/or the blocking layer may comprise silica-based materials.
In one embodiment, the tunnel layer comprises a silicon oxide formed by rapid thermal oxidation of the silicon-based material of the substrate layer.
The blocking layer may comprise (Si(OC2H5)4). The blocking layer may be formed utilising low-pressure chemical-vapor-deposition (CVD).
The gate layer may comprise a metal, metal nitride, silicide or polysilicon materials. In one embodiment, the metal material may comprise HfN.
The gate layer may be formed utilising sputter deposition techniques.
The method may further comprise the step of forming a capping layer on the gate layer. In one embodiment, the capping layer may comprise TaN.
The capping layer may be formed utilising sputter deposition techniques.
In accordance with a third aspect of the present invention there is provided a memory gate stack structure comprising:
a substrate layer comprising a silicon-based material,
a tunnel layer formed on the substrate layer,
a charge storage layer formed on the tunnel layer,
a blocking layer formed on the charge storage layer, and
a gate layer formed on the blocking layer,
wherein the charge storage layer comprises an amorphous material exhibiting a larger valence band offset with respect to the silicon-based material compared to Si3N4, and exhibiting a smaller conduction band offset with respect to the silicon-based material compared to Al2O3.
In accordance with a fourth aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of fabricating a memory gate stack structure, comprising the steps of:
providing a substrate layer comprising a silicon-based material,
forming a tunnel layer on the substrate layer,
forming a charge storage layer on the tunnel layer,
forming a blocking layer on the charge storage layer, and
forming a gate layer on the blocking layer,
wherein the charge storage layer comprises an amorphous material exhibiting a larger valence band offset with respect to the silicon-based material compared to Si3N4, and exhibiting a smaller conduction band offset with respect to the silicon-based material compared to Al2O3.
Embodiments of the invention will be better understood and readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art from the following written description, by way of example only, in conjunction with the drawings, in which:
a) shows capacitance versus charging time (C-t) curves at a charging voltage of 6V, for a memory gate stack structure embodying the present invention and in comparison with other memory gate stack structures.
b) shows normalised discharge C-t curves during discharging at a gate bias of −1.45V, for a memory gate stack structure embodying the present invention and in comparison with other memory gate stack structures.
a) shows capacitance versus voltage curves for a memory gate stack structure embodying the present invention.
b) shows capacitance versus voltage curves of another memory gate stack structure for comparison.
c) shows capacitance versus voltage curves of another memory gate stack structure for comparison.
a) shows plots of the density of stored charge, extracted from the curves shown in
b) shows plots of flatband voltage shift against the charging/discharging voltage for a memory gate stack structure embodying the present invention and in comparison with other memory gate stack structures.
The preferred embodiment described provides a memory gate stack structure for use in a memory transistor having both an acceptable over-erase characteristic, and an acceptable charge retention capability.
In order to obtain comparative data on the function of gate stack structures for a memory transistor, four different memory gate stack structures were fabricated and analysed.
For each device, the processing conditions were the same except for the formation of the charge storage layer 106, that is, Si3N4 for a conventional MONOS device, HfO2 for a comparative device, HfAlO (or (HfO2)x(Al2O3)1-x) for a device embodying the present invention, and Al2O3 for another comparative device.
Details of the structures used in conjunction with an example embodiment of the invention were as follows. The substrate 102 used was 4-8 Ω-cm (100) p-type silicon. The 25 Å thick tunnel oxide 104 was grown by rapid thermal oxidation at 1000° C. After tunnel oxide formation, Si3N4 (60 Å) was deposited by low-pressure chemical-vapor-deposition (LPCVD) while HfO2 (60 Å) and Al2O3 (60 Å) were deposited by atomic layer deposition (ALD), as the respective charge storage layers 106. (HfO2)x(Al2O3)1-x with x=0.9 and abbreviated as HfAlO henceforth, was deposited as a charge storage layer 106 by metal-organic-chemical-vapor-deposition (MOCVD), followed by post-deposition-annealing (PDA) at 700° C. in nitrogen ambient for 60 seconds. The blocking oxide 108 (55 Å) was deposited as LPCVD TEOS (Si(OC2H5)4). HfN metal gate electrode 110 (˜50 nm) and TaN (˜100 nm) capping layer 112 were deposited by reactive sputtering of Hf and Ta targets, respectively, in an Ar+N2 ambient. The fabricated gate stacks had a gate area of 800×800 μm2
The programming speeds of the various gate stack memory structures with HfO2, Al2O3, HfAlO or Si3N4 as the respective charge storage layers were evaluated by measuring the capacitance versus time (C-t) curve during charging at 6 V gate bias, as shown in
The charge retention performance was evaluated by measuring the C-t characteristics, after the device has been charged at 6 V for 80 s, at a constant discharge gate bias of −1.45 V with respect to the initial flatband voltage of the charged device.
The charge storage performance of memory devices with good retention characteristics, namely those with Al2O3, HfAlO or Si3N4 as the respective charge storage layers (curves 214, 210 and 212 respectively), was further investigated by measuring the hysteresis in the capacitance-voltage (C-V) curves. The C-V curves with counter-clockwise hysteresis are shown in
b) shows the shift in flatband voltage from that of the quasi-neutral condition, whereby the gate voltage sweep is restricted to a very small range to minimize charging of the device, for positive (program) and negative (erase) gate voltages. Both HfAlO and Al2O3 devices (curves 406 and 408 respectively) show better over-erase performance than Si3N4 devices (curve 410), with over-erase free characteristics up to a negative gate voltage sweep of −8 V and −10 V for HfAlO and Al2O3 devices, respectively, as compared to −4 V for Si3N4 devices. However, the Al2O3 device has the smallest charge storage capacity and the slowest charging rate of the three memory structures (see curve 400 in
The observed differences in charge storage and electron/hole injection (i.e., program/erase) characteristics and programming speed of the various structures may be explained by differences in the bandgap, valence and conduction band offsets of the various films with respect to silicon. The valence band offset of Si3N4 with respect to Si is the smallest, at 2 eV, compared to 3.3 eV for HfAlO and 4.9 eV for Al2O3. The conduction band offset between HfAlO and Si is the smallest, at 1.6 eV, as compared to 2 eV for Si3N4 and 2.8 eV for Al2O3.
A charge storage layer 510 comprising a hafnium-aluminium-oxide-based material is formed on the tunnel layer 508. A blocking layer 512 is formed on the charge storage layer 510, and a gate layer 514 is formed on the blocking layer 512, completing the memory transistor structure 500 in an example embodiment.
In the foregoing manner, a memory gate stack structure for e.g. a memory transistor and a method for fabricating the same are disclosed. Only several embodiments are described. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art in view of this disclosure that numerous changes and/or modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the invention.
For example, it will be appreciated by the person skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited to the deposition techniques and/or dimensioning of the memory gate stack structure of the embodiments described. In other embodiments, the thickness of the tunnel layer may, for example, be in the range from, but is not limited to, about 10 to 100 Å, the charge storage layer thickness may be in the range from, but is not limited to, about 30 to 200 Å, and the blocking layer thickness may be in the range from, but is not limited to, about 30 to 200 Å.
Also, the gate layer may be made from a different material including, for example, one or more of metal, metal nitride, silicide or polysilicon materials. Also, the charge storage layer may be formed from different hafnium-aluminium-oxide-based materials, including e.g. (HfO2)x(Al2O3)1-x, with x in the range from about 0.4 to 0.95.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SG2004/000050 | 3/11/2004 | WO | 00 | 3/14/2008 |