The invention relates to a memristive element, and to a nonvolatile electronic memory based on the use of a plurality of such elements.
The “memristor” concept was introduced in 1971 by L. O. Chua in the article “Memristor—The Missing Circuit Element”, IEEE Transactions on Circuit Theory, Vol. CT-18, 1971, pages 507-519.
Theoretically, a memristor is defined as an element (more exactly, an electrical dipole) in which the magnetic flux ΦB depends on the electric charge q that has passed through the element. The “memristance” M(q) is defined by:
It is possible to demonstrate that it follows from this definition that:
V(t)=M(q(t))I(t)
where V(t) is the voltage across the terminals of the dipole and I(t) the current flowing through it, both expressed as a function of time t. In other words, at any moment M(q) is equivalent to a resistance the value of which varies as a function of q, and therefore of the “history” of the current I (the trivial case where M(q)=R, i.e. a constant, and the memristor could be replaced by an ordinary resistor is not considered here).
If the V-I characteristics of a memristor are plotted, in general a curve exhibiting a double hysteresis cycle is obtained, as illustrated in
Because of this characteristic, certain memristors exhibit a bistable behavior and can be used as nonvolatile memory elements. Applying a voltage across the terminals of such a device causes a large variation in its resistance; for example, it passes from a high value, representing a logic value of “1”, to a low value, representing a value of “0”. As the V-I characteristics exhibit hysteresis, this resistance value is maintained when the voltage drops to zero; it is necessary to apply an inverse voltage in order to return to the initial (high) resistance value.
This bistable behavior also allows matrices of memristors to be used to carry out logic operations. See in this regard the article by J. Borghetti et al. “‘Memristive’ switches enable ‘stateful’ logic operations via material implication”, Nature, Vol. 464, pages 873-876, 8 Apr. 2010.
Even before the “memristor” concept had been formulated, certain materials, and especially thin films of TiO2, were already known by the electrochemists community, from the 1960s, to exhibit a behavior that could be qualified as “memristive”: see the article by F. Abgall “Switching phenomena in titanium oxide thin films”, Solid-State Electronics 1968. Vol. 11, pages 535-541.
Production of an electronic element that could be qualified as a “memristor” was described for the first time in the article by D. B. Strukov et al. “The missing memristor found”, Nature, Vol. 453, pages 80-83, 1st May 2008. This element used a TiO2/TiO2-x bilayer as an active material. See also documents US 2008/0079029, U.S. Pat. No. 7,763,880 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,271, which also envisage a possible generalization to other oxides, optionally of relatively complex composition.
The resistivity change that is the basis of the memristive behavior of these prior-art elements is caused by the migration, induced by an electric field, of dopant species—and in particular of oxygen vacancies—from a first conductive film that is rich therein to a second film that is deprived thereof, and that is therefore less conductive. The drawback of these devices is the relative complexity of the manufacture of the bilayer (even, in certain cases, the multilayer) structure.
As for the device described in the aforementioned article by J. Borghetti et al., it comprises just one TiO2 film sandwiched between two metallic films. It is known, in such a structure, that the dopant species (oxygen vacancies) form conductive filaments between the two metallic electrodes; see in this regard the articles by R. Waser “Nanoionics-based resistive switching memories”, Nature materials, Vol. 6, pages 833-840, November 2007, and “Redox-Based Resistive Switching Memories—Nanoionic Mechanisms, Prospects and Challenges”, Advanced Materials 21, pages 2632-2663, 2009. The growth of these conductive filaments is a random process that takes place along lattice dislocations. It is therefore difficult to ensure the presence of at least one of these filaments in a nanoscale device, thereby preventing its reliable operation. Therefore, a resistance-switching mechanism based on the formation of filamentary conductive pathways is intrinsically of a nature to limit device miniaturization.
It should also be underlined that the initial formation of these conductive filaments requires a preliminary film “electroforming” step, which is still little understood and therefore difficult to control (J. J. Yang et al., Nanotechnol., 2009, 20, 215201).
Document WO 2010/074689 reports memristive devices comprising a single active region, produced from a material comprising at least two mobile species. Several families of materials of this type are mentioned, among which substitution compounds in which alkali-metal atoms replace transition-metal atoms in order to form interstitial defects that act as dopants. It would seem that an electroforming step is also necessary to ensure that these devices operate (see the aforementioned article by J. Yang et al.).
Document US 2010/102289 describes a resistive memory element the active region of which comprises two films that are metallic or made of metal oxide, one of which is doped with a charge carrying species, these two films being separated by an intermediate film produced from a material other than that or those of the two other films. Production of such a device is complex.
Document WO 2008/145864 describes the use of insertion compounds of at least one alkali metal, made of an oxide or chalcogenide of at least one transition metal, exhibiting conductivity that is both electronic and ionic in nature and, most often, having a lamellar structure, to produce mass memories. Certain of these materials, such as NaxCoO2 and LixCoO2 (0<x≦1), are known as materials used to produce electrochemical batteries. See document EP 1 860 713, for example.
The mass memories described in the aforementioned document WO 2008/145864 comprise a bulk single-crystal substrate made of such a material, above which an atomic force microscope (AFM) probe is placed. A water meniscus forms spontaneously between the probe and the surface of the substrate; this meniscus ensures electrical conduction between these two elements and forms an electrochemical cell in which redox reactions can take place. It is precisely electrochemical reactions of this type, induced by applying a potential difference between the AFM probe and the substrate, that form the basis of operation of the mass memory.
Specifically, a change in the oxidation number of a transition-metal atom is accompanied by an inserted (or “intercalated”, the two terms being equivalent) alkali-metal atom being ejected to the surface, or, conversely, being returned to the core of the substrate, producing a reversible change in surface conductivity. See in this regard the following articles:
Such memories are very difficult and expensive to implement: the single-crystal substrates are difficult to manufacture and some of them, such as NaxCoO2, are unstable in air; the use of AFM probes introduces considerable complexity and requires a movable read head to scan the surface of the substrate.
The invention aims to overcome the aforementioned drawbacks of the prior art.
The present inventors have demonstrated that thin—even not single-crystal—films of these insertion compounds of at least one alkali metal, made of an oxide or chalcogenide of at least one transition metal, when placed in direct electrical contact with two electrodes, have a very marked memristive behavior. This allows “crossbar” matrices of resistive elements having a very simple structure and no moving parts to be produced. Moreover, thin polycrystalline or amorphous films are much simpler and less expensive to produce than single-crystal substrates. Miniaturization may be pushed to advanced levels (nanoscale memory cells), the memory then having a very short (nanosecond) write time. Specifically, movements of alkali-metal ions, and in particular Li+ or Na+ ions, which are small and therefore much more mobile than the oxygen vacancies responsible for the memristive behavior of TiO2 films, are used to cause the changes in electrical conductivity. The change in conductivity of these materials is not caused by the formation of filaments, and no preliminary electroforming is necessary.
It is important to note that the operating principle of these devices—not completely understood at the present time—is fundamentally different from that of the mass memory of the aforementioned document WO 2008/145864 because of the different nature of the active material (thin film instead of a bulk single-crystal substrate) and the absence of water meniscus.
One subject of the invention is therefore a memristive element formed by: a first electrode, a second electrode, and an active region making direct electrical contact with said first and second electrodes, characterized in that said active region consists essentially or exclusively of a thin film of an insertion compound of at least one alkali metal, made of an oxide or chalcogenide of at least one transition metal, exhibiting conductivity that is both electronic and ionic in nature.
According to various embodiments of the invention:
where:
Furthermore, preferably β≦10 and more preferably β≦5.
More precisely, said insertion compound of at least one alkali metal, made of an oxide or chalcogenide of at least one transition metal, may have the following formula:
A′xMyBβ
where:
Another subject of the invention is a nonvolatile electronic memory formed from a plurality of memristive elements such as described above, arranged in a matrix in rows and columns, all the elements of a given row sharing a common first electrode, and all the elements of a given column sharing a common second electrode.
Other features, details and advantages of the invention will become apparent on reading the description, given with reference to the appended drawings (provided by way of nonlimiting example) in which:
The device M in
The generator 50 is used to apply a first voltage ramp from 0 V to +4 V (R1 in
It may be seen from
When the voltage decreases (R2) and then becomes negative (R3), the resistance of the device changes little and remains at least about one MΩ. It is only when V reaches −3.5 V that another abrupt transition occurs, this time from the second state to the first.
The resistance of the element remains about a few kΩ/a few tens of kΩ when the voltage returns to zero (R4). The cycle may be repeated a number of times.
The device in
Many variants of the device of the invention may be envisioned.
For example, the first and second electrodes may both be made of a metal, or indeed of a degenerate semiconductor. They may especially be metal tracks, even tracks made of polysilicon, deposited on an insulating substrate (SiO2, intrinsic Si, etc.).
It has been observed that the difference in electrical resistance between the two states of the memristive device is particularly large when one of the two electrodes (for example, the first electrode 10 of the device in
The other electrode may be produced from a noble metal, such as gold, platinum, etc. Because of its chemical inertness, such a material does not take part in the electrochemical reactions that occur in the active volume. The use of two electrodes made of noble metals is possible, but less advantageous.
Such a configuration is particularly well suited to the production of matrices of memristors, as will be discussed below with reference to
Other materials may be used to produce the active film 20, these materials belonging to the family of the insertion compounds of an (at least one) alkali metal, made of an oxide or chalcogenide of a (at least one) transition metal, exhibiting conductivity that is both electronic and ionic in nature and generally having a lamellar structure.
Materials suitable for implementing the invention are characterized by the general formula
Ax(M1)v(M2)w(M3)y(M4)zBβ
where:
The parameters x, v, w, y, z and β must satisfy the following inequalities: 0<x≦1; 0≦v≦1; 0≦w<1; 0≦y≦1; 0≦z<1; and 1.5≦β. Thus, the parameter x may vary between 0 (exclusive, because the presence of an alkali metal is essential) and 1 (inclusive), whereas the parameters v, w, y and z may vary, individually, between 0 (inclusive) and 1 (inclusive), their sum (v+w+y+z) being required to equal 1. Another constraint on the values of v, w, y and z is that at least one transition metal must be present. In addition, x must have a value that ensures the chemical stability of the compound (the stability ranges of the parameter x depend on the qualitative composition of the material). As regards the parameter β (beta), it is 1.5 or more; it is difficult to define an upper limit on the value of this parameter; in the vast majority of cases, however, this value will remain less than or equal to 10 or even less than or equal to 5.
Advantageously, the material may be characterized by the general formula A′xMyBβ, where:
In particular, mention may be made of the following materials (unnormalized formulae): NaxCoO2, LixCoO2, LixNiO2, LixMn4O9, LixTiO2, Li4+xTi5O12, LixV2O5, LixV6O13, LixNiyCo(1-y)O2, LixFeO2, LixMnO2, LixMn2O4, LixMoO3 and LixNi1/3Mn1/3CO1/3O2.
The compounds NaxCoO2 and LixCoO2 are particularly preferred.
The thickness of the active film is given merely by way of example. In general, a film is considered to be “thin” if it is less than or equal to 10 μm in thickness, and preferably less than or equal to 1 μm in thickness. The minimum acceptable thickness depends on the material used; by way of indication, this thickness will preferably be greater than or equal to 10 nm.
Conductive tracks 15 (drawn with dotted lines) forming the “first electrodes” of the elements are deposited on an insulating substrate 11. All the elements of a given row of the matrix share the same first electrode (or, equivalently, they could have their first electrodes electrically connected together). A continuous film 21 of active material, preferably between 10 and 100 nm in thickness, is deposited on the substrate 11 and the first electrodes (in the figure, one corner of the film 21 has been omitted in order to show the elements located below). Other conductive tracks 35 are deposited perpendicular to the rows 15 on the substrate and on the active regions. The volumes of active film lying between a lower conductive track 15 and an upper conductive track 25 form the active regions 22 of the elements of the matrix. Localized deposition of the active material only where the electrodes overlap is also possible, and even preferable because it guarantees better (electrical and chemical) isolation between the elements of the matrix; however, this embodiment is more complicated to implement.
For the reasons given above, the conductive tracks and/or 35 will preferably be produced from a conductive material capable of forming an alloy with the (or at least one) alkali metal of the active film—silicon for example. The use of silicon is particularly preferable for technological reasons.
It may be seen that all the elements of a given row of the matrix share the same second electrode formed by a track 35 (or, equivalently, they could have their first electrodes electrically connected together). A “crossbar” structure is thus formed: applying a potential difference between the ith row and the jth column allows the element Mij of the memory to be written to/read from. The term “write” is understood here to mean applying a potential difference that is sufficiently high to significantly modify the resistivity of the element; the term “read” is understood to mean applying a lower potential difference, measuring the value of the current and deducing therefrom the resistance value and therefore the state of the element.
This structure is conventional; the devices of the invention may also be applied to other architectures.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 04931 | Dec 2010 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2011/055672 | 12/14/2011 | WO | 00 | 7/12/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/080967 | 6/21/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7417271 | Genrikh et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7763880 | Williams | Jul 2010 | B2 |
20080079029 | Williams | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080180989 | Baek | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20100102289 | Dimitrov | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100195475 | Moradpour et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110065000 | Chang | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110186798 | Kwon | Aug 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2008145864 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2010014064 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO 2010074589 | Jul 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2011/055672 dated Mar. 8, 2012. |
Chua, L., Memristor—The Missing Circuit Element, IEEE Transactions on Circuit Theory, vol. 18, No. 5, (Jan. 1971) 507-519. |
Abgall, F., Switching Phenomena in Titanium Oxide Thin Film, Solid-State Electronics, vol. 11 (1968) 535-541. |
Borghetti, J. et al., “Memristive” Switches Enable “Stateful” Logic Operations Via Material Implication, Nature, vol. 464 (Apr. 2010) 873-876. |
Schneefans, O. et al., J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 129 (2007) 7482. |
Schneefans, O., et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 108 (2004) 9882. |
Strukov, D.B. et al., The Missing Memristor Found, Nature, vol. 452 (May 2008) 80-83. |
Waser, R., Nanoionics-Based Resistive Switching Memories, Nature Materials, vol. 6, (Nov. 2007) 833-840. |
Yang, J. J. et al., Nanotechnol. 20 (2009) 215201. |
Redox-Based Resistive Switching Memories—Nanoionic Mechanisms, Prospects and Challenges, Advanced Materials 21 (2009) 2632-2663. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130277638 A1 | Oct 2013 | US |