1. Field of the Invention
The present disclosure relates to the art of microphones and, particularly to a MEMS microphone used in a portable device, such as a mobile phone.
2. Description of Related Arts
Miniaturized silicon microphones have been extensively developed for over sixteen years, since the first silicon piezoelectric microphone reported by Royer in 1983. In 1984, Hohm reported the first silicon electret-type microphone, made with a metallized polymer diaphragm and silicon backplate. And two years later, he reported the first silicon condenser microphone made entirely by silicon micro-machining technology. Since then a number of researchers have developed and published reports on miniaturized silicon condenser microphones of various structures and performance. U.S. Pat. No. 5,870,482 to Loeppert et al reveals a silicon microphone. U.S. Pat. No. 5,490,220 to Loeppert shows a condenser and microphone device. U.S. Patent Application Publication 2002/0067663 to Loeppert et al shows a miniature acoustic transducer. U.S. Pat. No. 6,088,463 to Rombach et al teaches a silicon condenser microphone process. U.S. Pat. No. 5,677,965 to Moret et al shows a capacitive transducer. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,146,435 and 5,452,268 to Bernstein disclose acoustic transducers. U.S. Pat. No. 4,993,072 to Murphy reveals a shielded electret transducer.
Various microphone designs have been invented and conceptualized by using silicon micro-machining technology. Despite various structural configurations and materials, the silicon condenser microphone consists of four basic elements: a movable compliant diaphragm, a rigid and fixed backplate (which together form a variable air gap capacitor), a voltage bias source, and a pre-amplifier. These four elements fundamentally determine the performance of the condenser microphone. In pursuit of high performance; i.e., high sensitivity, low bias, low noise, and wide frequency range, the key design considerations are to have a large size of diaphragm and a large air gap. The former will help increase sensitivity as well as lower electrical noise, and the later will help reduce acoustic noise of the microphone. The large air gap requires a thick sacrificial layer. For releasing the sacrificial layer, the backplate is provided with a plurality of through holes. However, the through holes are unequally distributed in the backplate, which affects the releasing speed rate of the sacrificial layer and further affects the performance of the microphone.
Therefore, it is desirable to provide a MEMS microphone which can overcome the above-mentioned problems.
Many aspects of the embodiment can be better understood with reference to the following drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale, the emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the present disclosure. Moreover, in the drawings, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
Referring to
Referring to
The second through holes 136 are evenly distributed in the area surrounded by the first through holes 135.
Each of the first through holes 135 is formed by a first boundary 350 and a second boundary 351 with two ends thereof directly connecting two ends of the first boundary 350. The first boundary 350 is spaced from the edge of the main part 133 for forming the distance d. The first boundary 350 is configured to be straight and the second boundary 351 is configured to be an arc. The first boundary 350 defines a width L and includes a middle point P. A longest distance between the middle point P and the second boundary 351 is greater than half of the width L. Another word, the second boundary 351 has a radius greater than half of the width L. And another word, the width L of the first boundary 350 is smaller than the diameter of the second boundary 351.
By virtue of the configuration described above, the sacrificial layer near the edge of the backplate can be fully released through the through holes defined in the main part of the backplate, which effectively improves the performance of the MEMS microphone.
It is to be understood, however, that even though numerous characteristics and advantages of the present embodiment have been set forth in the foregoing description, together with details of the structures and functions of the embodiment, the disclosure is illustrative only, and changes may be made in detail, especially in matters of shape, size, and arrangement of parts within the principles of the invention to the full extent indicated by the broad general meaning of the terms in which the appended claims are expressed.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2011 1 0125517 | May 2011 | CN | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4311881 | Reynard | Jan 1982 | A |
4858719 | Fidi et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
7912236 | Dehe et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7951636 | Lee et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7974430 | Izuchi et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8129803 | Martin et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
20030123683 | Raicevich | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20060280319 | Wang et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070165888 | Weigold | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070201710 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080104825 | Dehe et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080304681 | Langlois et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090278217 | Laming et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100124343 | Zhang | May 2010 | A1 |
20100166235 | Zhang | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100290648 | Zhang | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110216922 | Li et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110235829 | Yang et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110241137 | Huang et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110255716 | Ge et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120294464 A1 | Nov 2012 | US |