MEMS motion sensor and method of manufacturing

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11852481
  • Patent Number
    11,852,481
  • Date Filed
    Friday, February 13, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 26, 2023
    11 months ago
Abstract
A MEMS motion sensor and its manufacturing method are provided. The sensor includes a MEMS wafer including a proof mass and flexible springs suspending the proof mass and enabling the proof mass to move relative to an outer frame along mutually orthogonal x, y and z axes. The sensor includes top and bottom cap wafers including top and bottom cap electrodes forming capacitors with the proof mass, the electrodes being configured to detect a motion of the proof mass. Electrical contacts are provided on the top cap wafer, some of which are connected to the respective top cap electrodes, while others are connected to the respective bottom cap electrodes by way of insulated conducting pathways, extending along the z axis from one of the respective bottom cap electrodes and upward successively through the bottom cap wafer, the outer frame of the MEMS wafer and the top cap wafer.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to MicroElectroMechanical Systems (MEMS) motion sensors enabling electrical measurements from top and/or bottom caps. The invention also relates to a method for manufacturing MEMS motion sensors.


BACKGROUND

MEMS inertial sensors, which include accelerometers and angular rate sensors or gyroscopes, are used in a growing number of applications which have been increasing steadily over the past decade.


Presently, most MEMS gyroscopes use polysilicon as their mechanical material. However, due to the build-up of stresses in films deposited during the fabrication of these devices, processes for physical and chemical deposition are limited to only a few micrometers of material. Consequently polysilicon devices tend to have small masses. Small sensing masses provide low measurement sensitivity and higher vulnerability to thermal noise. Additionally, since springs and comb electrodes are patterned in the same material as the mass, the spring and electrode widths are limited to only a few microns, leading to small sense capacitances and weak springs. Furthermore, the dimensions of the capacitors, springs, and proof mass are all determined by the mechanical polysilicon film thickness. Some MEMS gyroscope manufacturers have tried to address sensitivity and noise issues by using a thicker MEMS layer made out of a single crystal silicon layer. However, as with the polysilicon devices, the spring width cannot be decoupled from the mass thickness. If the mass thickness is increased to increase sensitivity or decrease noise, the spring stiffness will increase, counteracting the effects of the mass increase.


MEMS gyroscopes are generally two-dimensional architectures using comb drives and detectors. The directions parallel to the plane of the device (typically denoted x and y) are similar (in mass distribution, symmetry, etc.), but the direction perpendicular to the plane (z) is different from the other two. Consequently, different angular rate transduction methods must be used for each, resulting in two classes of gyroscopes: 2 axis x/y gyroscopes and 1 axis z gyroscopes. Devices marketed as three axis gyroscopes typically consist of three gyroscopes integrated onto the same chip with as many as four to six proof masses.


Numerous subsequent improvements in MEMS inertial measurement unit (IMU) packaging have been made to simplify the package and reduce cost. Most of these approaches take advantage of the 2D planar nature of silicon microelectronics fabrication. Most MEMS devices are fabricated by successively depositing thin films, using a photolithographic process to form the desired 2D shape of the film, such as the MEMS inertial sensor proof mass, and etching the pattern into the film. In some cases the photolithographic process produces a form into which the film is plated or deposited to form the desired pattern. This process sequence is repeated over and over to form the final device. As a result, most MEMS devices are planar or two-dimensional since they consist of a stack of very thin films, each typically on the order of micrometer thick or less.


In all these cases a cap (e.g. silicon or glass) is placed over the MEMS to protect it and electrical contact is made to the top of the MEMS and/or CMOS. Most of these integration approaches are based on the 2D nature of the sensors with detection and signal transduction in the plane of the device. For example, almost all accelerometers and gyroscopes use comb capacitors for drive and detection in the plane of the device. Consequently the electrical leads have to be brought out on the MEMS wafer under the cap, so IMU packaging still requires wire bonding and packaging.


Efforts have been made to overcome the sensitivity limitations due to the small mass by using bulk silicon micromachining to fabricate a larger proof mass from the full thickness of the silicon wafer. Most of these efforts have been directed towards the development of accelerometers; little work has been done on large proof mass gyroscopes.


What is needed is a MEMS motion sensor which allows transmitting electrical signals from within the sensor to at least one cap, while enclosing the proof mass. It would also be desirable for the motion sensor to allow measurement of acceleration along three axes, and also the measurement of angular rate. Current pendulous accelerometer designs have not been successfully adapted to angular velocity measurements.


Additionally, what is needed is a wafer-scale fabrication method in which the proof mass is sealed in an enclosure which provides electrodes above and also below the proof mass, to drive and sense the motion.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A MEMS motion sensor is provided. The MEMS wafer has first and second opposed sides and includes an outer frame, a proof mass and flexible springs suspending the proof mass relative to the outer frame and enabling the proof mass to move relative to the outer frame along mutually orthogonal x, y and z axes. The sensor also includes top and bottom cap wafers respectively bonded to the first and second sides of the MEMS wafer. The top cap wafer, the bottom cap wafer and the outer frame of the MEMS wafer define a cavity for housing the proof mass. The MEMS wafer, the top cap wafer and the bottom cap wafer are electrically conductive, and are preferably made of silicon-based semiconductor. Top and bottom cap electrodes are respectively provided in the top and bottom cap wafers and form capacitors with the proof mass, the top and bottom cap electrodes are configurable to detect a motion of the proof mass. Electrical contacts are provided on the top cap wafer and form first and second sets of electrical contacts. The electrical contact of the first set are connected to the respective top cap electrodes, and the electrical contacts of the second set are connected to the respective bottom cap electrodes by way of respective insulated conducting pathways, each extending along the z axis from one of the respective bottom cap electrodes and upward successively through the bottom cap wafer, the outer frame of the MEMS wafer and the top cap wafer.


In some embodiments, the proof mass and flexible springs form a resonant structure having resonant frequencies fx, fy and fz for motion along the x, y and z axes, respectively.


In some embodiments, the MEMS motion sensor comprises electrode assemblies (or sets of electrodes), each including at least one pair of the top and/or bottom cap electrodes. Preferably, the motion sensor includes a first set of electrodes configurable to detect a rocking motion of the proof mass about the y axis, indicative of an acceleration of the proof mass along the x axis; a second set of electrodes configurable to detect a rocking motion of the proof mass about the x axis, indicative of an acceleration of the proof mass along the y axis; and a third set of electrodes configured to detect a translational motion of the proof mass along the z axis, indicative of an acceleration of the proof mass along the z axis.


In some embodiments, one set of electrode is configured to vibrate the proof mass at a drive frequency along the z axis, and two other sets of electrodes are configured to detect Coriolis-induced oscillations of the proof mass along the x and y axes, indicative of an angular motion of the proof mass about the y and x axes, respectively.


The drive frequency preferably corresponds to the resonant frequency fz. In some embodiments, the resonant frequency fz is substantially identical to each of the respective resonant frequencies fx, fy, in order to provide matched resonance conditions. Preferably, a relative difference between any two of the resonant frequencies fz, fx, fy is no more than 10%. It is also possible that the resonant structure be shaped, sized and configured with each of the resonant frequencies fx, fy and fz being substantially different, for example with mutually non-overlapping 3 dB-bandwidths, in order to provide non-matched resonance conditions.


In some embodiments, the drive frequency is lower than at least one of the respective resonant frequencies fx and fy, such as 10-40% lower.


In some embodiments, one set of electrodes is configured to vibrate the proof mass at a drive frequency along a corresponding one of the x and y axes, respectively, and another set of electrodes is configured to detect Coriolis-induced oscillations of the proof mass along the other one of the x and y axes, indicative of an angular motion of the proof mass about the z axis.


In some embodiments, the resonant structure is shaped, sized and configured such that each of the resonant frequencies fx, fy and fz is substantially higher than sensing frequencies at which the electrode assemblies are configured to detect the motion of the proof mass in response to accelerations of the proof mass along to the x, y and z axes, respectively.


In some embodiments, the top and bottom cap electrodes may comprise a pair of said top and bottom electrodes aligned with the z axis, which is centered relative to the proof mass. The top and bottom cap electrodes may also comprise two pairs of said top and bottom electrodes disposed along the x axis on each side of the y axis, and also possibly two pairs of said top and bottom electrodes disposed along the y axis on each side of the x axis.


In some embodiments, the proof mass can be shaped as a convex polygonal prism, which is preferably regular, such as an octagonal prism. Typically, the motion sensor includes four flexible springs.


The top and bottom electrodes typically extend through the entire thicknesses of the top and bottom cap wafers, respectively, and are preferably delimited by insulated channels. Preferably, the MEMS wafer is a silicon on insulator (SOI) wafer with an insulating layer separating a device layer from a handle layer, and the proof mass can be patterned in both the device and handle layers.


In some embodiments, the motion sensor comprise an additional insulated conducting pathway extending through the bottom cap wafer, through the frame of the MEMS wafer, and though the top cap wafer, between one of the electrical contacts of the top cap wafer to the electrical contact of the bottom cap wafer, thereby forming a conductive feedthrough.


A method for manufacturing the MEMS motion sensor is also provided. The method comprises the steps of:

  • a) providing the top and bottom cap wafers and forming insulated conducting cap wafer channels; patterning trenches and filling the trenches to form electrodes on the inner sides of the cap wafers, some of the insulated conducting cap wafer channels being electrically connected to the respective electrodes;
  • b) providing a MEMS wafer and patterning portions of the proof mass, of the flexible springs and of the outer frame with insulated conducting MEMS wafer channels in one of the first and second sides;
  • c) bonding the side of the MEMS wafer patterned in step b) to the inner side of the top or bottom cap wafer by aligning the insulated conducting cap wafer channels with the corresponding portions of the insulated conducting MEMS channels, and by aligning the electrodes relative to the proof mass and the springs;
  • d) patterning the remaining portions of the proof mass, of the flexible springs and of the outer frame (164) with the insulated conducting MEMS wafer channels on the other side of the MEMS wafer;
  • e) bonding the side of the MEMS wafer patterned in step d) to the inner side of the other top or bottom cap wafer, by aligning the electrodes of the top cap wafer with the electrodes of the bottom cap wafer and by aligning the insulated conducting cap wafer channels of the other cap wafer with the remaining portions of the insulated conducting MEMS channels, creating insulated conducting pathways, some of which extend from the electrodes of the bottom cap wafer, through the outer frame of the MEMS wafer and through the top cap wafer, and enclosing the proof mass suspended relative to the outer frame by the flexible springs within a cavity formed by the top and bottom cap wafers and by the outer frame (164) of the MEMS wafer (16); and
  • f) removing a portion of the top and bottom cap wafers to expose and isolate the insulated conducting pathways and the electrodes in the top and bottom cap wafers.


The method can also include a step of forming electrical contacts on the outer side of the top cap wafer connected with the insulated conducting pathways, allowing routing of electrical signals from the electrodes of the bottom cap wafer to these electrical contacts. The method can also include a step of forming electrical contacts on the bottom cap wafer, connected to some of the insulated conducting pathways, allowing routing of electrical signals to the electrical contacts on the bottom cap wafer.


Of course, other processing steps may be performed prior, during or after the above described steps. The order of the steps may also differ, and some of the steps may be combined.





DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

It should be noted that the appended drawings illustrate only exemplary embodiments of the invention and should therefore not be considered limiting of its scope, as the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.



FIG. 1 is an exploded view of a MEMS motion sensor, according to a possible embodiment.



FIG. 2 is a schematic cross-sectional view of a MEMS motion sensor of showing the position of the proof mass in the absence of acceleration or angular velocity.



FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the MEMS motion sensor of FIG. 2, showing the rotation of the proof mass in response to acceleration in the x direction.



FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of the MEMS motion sensor of FIG. 2, showing the translation of the proof mass in response to acceleration in the z direction.



FIG. 5 is a partial perspective view of a motion sensor showing the electrodes and proof mass, for measuring acceleration along the x, y and z axis.



FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of the MEMS motion sensor of FIG. 2, showing the proof mass oscillating along the x axis while being driven at resonant frequency in the z direction, in response to the sensor being rotated around the y axis.



FIG. 7 is a graph showing the frequency response curves for off-resonance angular velocity measurement, with the resonant frequency of the proof mass in x or y (fx and fy, respectively) being higher than the z resonant frequency fz.



FIG. 8 is a graph showing the frequency response curves for matched or near-matched-mode angular velocity measurement, with the resonant frequency of the proof mass in x or y being similar to the resonant frequency fz.



FIG. 9 is a partial perspective view of a motion sensor showing the electrodes and proof mass, for measuring angular velocity around the z axis.



FIG. 10 is a graph showing frequency response as a function of angular velocity for a proof mass with different resonant frequencies fx, fy, and fz.



FIGS. 11A to 11D are different cross-sectional views of the MEMS motion sensor of FIG. 1, each view showing an insulated conducting pathway through the MEMS motion sensor.



FIGS. 12, 12A, 12B and 12C are views of the MEMS sensor structure including FIG. 12, which is a bottom view of a first or top cap wafer of the MEMS motion sensor of FIG. 1. FIGS. 12A and 12B are cross-sectional views of FIG. 11. FIG. 11A shows the etching of trenches in the top cap wafer. FIG. 11B shows the filling of the trenches of the top cap wafer with insulating and conducting material, for forming top cap wafer electrodes and channels. FIG. 11C is an enlarged view of a filled trench, according to a possible embodiment.



FIGS. 13 and 13A are top and cross-sectional views, respectively, in which FIG. 13 is a top view of a second or bottom cap wafer of the MEMS motion sensor of FIG. 1. FIG. 13A is a cross-sectional view of FIG. 13, showing trenches of the bottom wafer cap filled with insulating and conducting material, for forming bottom cap wafer electrodes and channels.



FIG. 14 is a top view of the MEMS wafer of the MEMS motion sensor of FIG. 1, during one of the manufacturing steps. In this embodiment, the MEMS wafer is a SOI wafer.



FIGS. 14A and 14B are cross-sectional views of the MEMS wafer of FIG. 14, showing the fabrication of SOI conducting shunts.



FIG. 15 is a top view of the MEMS wafer during another manufacturing step.



FIG. 15A is a cross-sectional view of the MEMS wafer of FIG. 15, showing the patterning of part of the proof mass and of the feedthrough channels in the frame portion of the device layer.



FIG. 16 is an exploded view of the top cap wafer of FIG. 12 and of the MEMS wafer of FIG. 15.



FIG. 16A is a cross-sectional view of the top cap wafer bonded to the MEMS wafer, showing the alignment of the top cap wafer with the first side of the MEMS wafer, which in this embodiment corresponds to the device layer side.



FIG. 17 is a top view of the second side of the MEMS wafer, which in this embodiment corresponds to the handle layer side.



FIG. 17A is a cross-sectional view of the MEMS wafer bonded to the top cap wafer, turned upside down, for patterning the remaining portion of the proof mass and of the MEMS wafer channels in the handle layer.



FIGS. 18 and 18A are perspective and cross-sectional views of the bottom cap wafer (located on top), respectively, wherein FIG. 18A is a cross-sectional view of the bottom cap wafer bonded to the MEMS wafer, showing the alignment of the bottom cap wafer with the second side of the MEMS wafer, which in this embodiment corresponds to the device layer side.



FIG. 19 is a top perspective view of the MEMS motion sensor.



FIG. 19A is a cross-sectional view of the MEMS motion sensor during its manufacturing, after grinding, polishing, and passivation of the top cap wafer.



FIG. 20 is a cross-sectional view of the MEMS motion sensor of FIG. 18A, after opening contacts in the cap insulating layer of the top cap wafer, for connection with the insulated conducting pathways.



FIG. 21 is a cross-sectional view of the MEMS motion sensor of FIG. 20, after applying a metallic layer on the cap insulating layer.



FIG. 22 is a cross-sectional view of the MEMS motion sensor of FIG. 21, after patterning the metallic layer to leave bond pads and leads.



FIG. 23 is a cross-sectional view of the MEMS motion sensor of FIG. 22, after applying a passivating film over the electrical leads and bond pads.



FIGS. 24 and 24A are top and side views in which FIG. 24 is a top side perspective view of the MEMS device of FIG. 1. FIG. 24A is a cross-sectional view of the MEMS motion sensor of FIG. 24, showing the openings in the insulating film over the pond pads.



FIG. 25A is a perspective view of a MEMS motion sensor, shown with a CMOS IC stacked on its top cap wafer, and electrically bonded to it with wire bonds.



FIG. 25B is a perspective view of a MEMS motion sensor, stacked on a CMOS IC and electrically bonded to it with wire bonds.



FIG. 25C is a perspective view of a CMOS IC flip-chip bonded to a MEMS motion sensor.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF AN EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION

In the following description, similar features of the drawings have been given similar reference numerals. To preserve the clarity of the drawings, some reference numerals have been omitted when they were already identified in a preceding figure.


The present invention provides a MEMS motion sensor formed by a top cap wafer, a central MEMS wafer and a bottom cap wafer, the wafers being made of an electrically conducting material, such as silicon. Both the top and bottom cap wafers are provided with electrodes on both sides of a pendulous proof mass. The MEMS motion sensor also includes insulated conducting pathways, at least some of which extend from electrodes in the bottom cap wafer, through the MEMS wafer and to the top cap wafer, allowing routing or transmitting electrical signals sensed by the electrodes of the bottom cap through the MEMS wafer, and more specifically through the lateral frame of the sensor, from the bottom cap wafer to the top cap wafer. This architecture of the MEMS motion sensor enables the placement of electrodes and electrical leads above, below, and/or around a pendulous proof mass, for measuring acceleration and/or angular velocity. This architecture of the MEMS motion sensor thus not only allows encapsulating the proof mass, it also makes efficient use of the protective caps by including electrodes in the caps, and by providing insulated conducted pathways which allow routing signals from the bottom side of the sensor to the top side, allowing the placement of the electrical contacts on a single side of the sensor. Of course, if needed, electrical contacts can also be placed on the bottom side of the sensor. Yet another advantage of the present MEMS motion sensor resides in the patterning of a bulk, pendulous proof mass (having for example a thickness varying from 400 to 700 um), which is suspended by flexible springs patterned such that they are much thinner than the proof mass. Further details regarding devices and methods of operating motion sensors are described in international application number PCT/CA2014/050635 entitled “MEMS Device and Method of Manufacturing” filed on Jul. 4, 2014, and the corresponding U.S. Application No. filed on Feb. 13, 2015, the entire contents of these applications being incorporated herein by reference.


Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, an exploded view and cross-sectional view respectively of the different layers of a MEMS motion sensor 10 according to a possible embodiment are shown. The MEMS device 10 includes a central MEMS wafer 16 having first and second opposed sides 161,162. The MEMS wafer 16 includes an outer frame 164, a proof mass 17 and flexible springs 27 suspending the proof mass 17 relative to the outer frame 164 and enabling the proof mass 17 to move in 3 dimension relative to the outer frame 164 along mutually orthogonal x, y and z axes. The motion sensor 10 also includes top and bottom cap wafers 12, 14 respectively bonded to the first and second sides 161, 162 of the MEMS wafer 16. The top cap wafer 12, the bottom cap wafer 14 and the outer frame 164 of the MEMS wafer 16 defining a cavity 31 for housing the proof mass 17. The MEMS wafer 16, the top cap wafer 12 and the bottom cap wafer 14 are made of electrically conductive material.


The motion sensor 10 includes top and bottom cap electrodes 13, 15 respectively provided in the top and bottom cap wafers 12, 14, and forming capacitors with the proof mass 17. The electrodes are configured to detect a motion of the proof mass 17, such as a translation along the z axis, or a rocking along the x or y axis. Electrical contacts 42 are provided on the top cap wafer 12. The contacts 42 form first and second sets of electrical contacts: the electrical contact of the first set are connected to the top cap electrodes 13, and the electrical contacts of the second set are connected to the bottom cap electrodes 15 by way of respective insulated conducting pathways, such as pathway 33ii. The pathways connected to the bottom cap electrodes extend upward along the z axis, successively through the bottom cap wafer 14, the outer frame 164 of the MEMS wafer 16 and the top cap wafer 12. Of course, other electrical contacts can be provided on the top cap wafer, such as for connecting feedthroughs extending from the bottom to the top cap for example, and other insulated conducting pathways, such as pathway 33i, can be provided for connecting electrodes of the top cap wafer, and also possibly of the proof mass.


In the present description, the terms “top” and “bottom” relate to the position of the wafers as shown in the figures. Unless otherwise indicated, positional descriptions such as “top”, “bottom” and the like should be taken in the context of the figures and should not be considered as being limitative. The top cap wafer can also be referred as a first cap wafer, and the bottom cap wafer can be referred as a second cap wafer. The terms “top” and “bottom” are used to facilitate reading of the description, and persons skilled in the art of MEMS know that, when in use, MEMS devices can be placed in different orientations such that the “top cap wafer” and the “bottom cap wafer” are positioned upside down. In this particular embodiment, the “top” refers to the direction of the device layer.


In this specific embodiment, the proof mass 17 is suspended by four flexible springs (27i, 27ii, 27iii and 27iv—identified in FIG. 5) between the two caps 12, 14, each with five electrodes (13i, 13ii, 13ii, 13iv, 13v and 15i, 15ii, 15iii, 15iv and 15v—also identified in FIG. 5) disposed to measure the position of the proof mass in 3-dimensional space in response to acceleration and angular velocity. The capacitance is monitored between pairs of electrodes, for example 13i and 15i or 13i, 13ii and the proof mass. Of course, the number of electrodes can vary depending on the application in which the motion sensor is to be used, and a pair of electrodes does not necessarily need to be aligned and does not necessarily include a top and a bottom electrode. The motion sensor includes reconfigurable electrode assemblies or “sets” of electrodes to monitor the position of the proof mass within the cavity. An electrode assembly can include paired top cap electrodes, paired bottom cap electrodes or paired top and bottom cap electrodes. An electrode assembly can include one or more paired electrodes. The electrode assemblies can be reconfigured depending of the measurement to be made.


The proof mass 17 and flexible springs 27 form together a resonant structure having resonant frequencies fx, fy and fz for motion along the x, y and z axes, respectively. The resonant frequencies can be set by adjusting the width and thickness of the springs and/or the size and shape of the proof mass.


Referring to FIGS. 2 to 5, schematic cross-sections of a motion sensor 10 taken along the x axis illustrate the motion of the proof mass 17 in different situations. In the absence of acceleration and angular velocity, as shown in FIG. 2, the proof mass 17 is ideally positioned equidistant between top electrodes 13i, 13ii, 13v and bottom electrodes 15i, 15ii, 15v such that the differential capacitance is zero, i.e.: [Cx-Top]−[Cx-Bottom]=0.


In FIG. 3, the sensor 10 is subjected to acceleration along the x axis, causing the proof mass to rotate around the center of the resonant structure with an axis of rotation in the y direction; this rotation leads to a change in differential capacitance proportional to the acceleration. For example, measuring the difference in capacitance between 13i and 13ii yields a differential capacitance proportional to the x acceleration. Similarly, acceleration along the y axis causes the proof mass to rotate around the x in the same manner.


As shown in FIG. 4, acceleration along the z axis causes the proof mass 17 to translate vertically. Again the acceleration can be measured by monitoring the difference in capacitance between a pair of electrodes, for example, 13i and 15ii. The sensor thus includes different electrodes assemblies or sets to detect motion of the proof mass along the x, y and z axes. A first set of electrodes is configured to detect a rocking motion of the proof mass 17 about the y axis, indicative of an acceleration of the proof mass along the x axis. A second set of electrodes is configured to detect a rocking motion of the proof mass about the x axis, indicative of an acceleration of the proof mass along the y axis. Finally, a third set of electrode is configured to detect a translational motion of the proof mass along the z axis, indicative of an acceleration of the proof mass along the z axis.



FIG. 5 depicts a possible configuration of the electrodes in the MEMS motion sensor for the measurement of acceleration. Two pairs of top and bottom electrodes 13i, 15i and 13ii, 15ii are disposed along the x axis, on each side of the y axis and two pairs of top and bottom electrodes 13iii, 15iii and 13iv, 15iv are disposed along the y axis, on each side of the x axis.


Finally, the motion sensor includes a pair of top and bottom electrodes 13v and 15v. Electrode 15v is similar to electrode 13v, but hidden underneath proof mass 17. The electrodes 13v and 15v are aligned with the z axis, which is centered relative to the proof mass.


Of course, the electrode assemblies can be grouped and/or positioned differently, and include more or less electrodes, as long as they are able to detect motion of the proof mass in all three directions x, y and z.


In addition to detecting accelerations of the proof mass, the MEMS motion sensor can also be configured to detect angular rate or angular velocity (deg/sec). Typically, MEMS gyroscopes use vibrating mechanical elements to sense angular rotation via the Coriolis Effect. The Coriolis Effect arises when a mass M is moving at velocity {right arrow over (ν)} in a reference frame rotating with angular rate {right arrow over (Ω)}. An observer sitting in the rotating frame perceives the mass to be deflected from its straight-line trajectory by the Coriolis Force, given by {right arrow over (F)}Coriolis=2M{right arrow over (ν)}×{right arrow over (Ω)}, where × denotes the vector cross-product.


In order to detect angular motion of the suspended proof mass, a periodic force is applied to the proof mass along one direction. When the sensor, and by extension the proof mass, is subjected to an angular rotation, a periodic Coriolis force proportional to the rate of rotation at the same frequency as the drive, but out of phase by 90 degrees, is induced along a direction perpendicular to both the drive signal and the axis of rotation. The magnitude of this motion can measured using capacitive sensing techniques.


The MEMS motion sensor can sense motion over 5 degrees of freedom (5 DOF), that is, accelerations along x, y and z axes, and angular velocity along the x and y axes. In this case, an electrode assembly is configured to vibrate the proof mass 17 at a drive frequency along the z axis, and two other electrode assemblies are configured to detect Coriolis-induced oscillations of the proof mass along the x and y axes, indicative of an angular motion of the proof mass with respect to the y and x axes, respectively.



FIG. 6 illustrates the measurement of angular motion (or angular rate), in this case around the y axis (represented by a vector into of the page). The proof mass 17 is driven at the resonant frequency in the z-direction, z=z0 sin ωt with velocity vz=v0 cos ωt. If the sensor 10 rotates around the y axis at an angular rate of Ωy, the proof mass 17 will oscillate along the x axis ({right arrow over (a)}Coriolis=2{right arrow over (ν)}×{right arrow over (Ω)}) in response to the Coriolis acceleration, aCoriolis=2ν0Ωy cos ωt. This motion can be measured using a Phase-Locked-Loop (PLL) as an oscillating differential capacitance in much the same way as the linear acceleration is measured. In a similar way, angular rate around the x axis can be measured at the same time by measuring the differential capacitance on the y axis electrodes in quadrature with the drive voltage.


The resonant structure formed by the proof mass 17 and flexible springs 27 can be sized, shaped and configured to provide either matched or unmatched resonance conditions, depending on the objective sought. Referring to FIG. 7, for unmatched resonance conditions, the x and y sense measurements are made at the z drive frequency which is well below the x and y rocking resonances and are thus much less sensitive to temperature and other variations that can lead to bias drift. As shown in the graph of FIG. 7, the drive frequency at which the proof mass is vibrated, which in this case also corresponds to the resonant frequency fz, is lower, than the resonant frequencies fx and fy. In this possible embodiment, the proof mass and flexible springs are designed, shaped and configured so that the rocking frequencies fx and fy are higher than the vertical (z axis) drive frequency, such as 10-40% higher. In this configuration the sense measurement is made at the drive frequency fz, which is well below the rocking resonance, fx or fy.


Referring now to FIG. 8, by increasing the lateral dimensions of the proof mass, the rocking frequencies fx, fy, can be increased until they are matched or nearly matched to that of the vertical frequency fz, so that the mechanical gain of the rocking motion can be exploited for higher sensitivity. In this other embodiment, the resonant structure is shaped, sized and configured such that the resonant frequency fz is substantially identical to each of the respective resonant frequencies fx, fy, to provide matched resonance conditions. For example, the resonant structure can have respective resonant frequencies fz, fx, fy that are no more than 10% from one another, or alternatively within mutually overlapping 3 dB-bandwidths.


The ratios of the frequencies can be adjusted by modifying the ratios of the rocking moment of inertia to the total mass. The ratios of the rocking frequencies fx, fy to the vertical resonant frequency fz depend chiefly on the ratio of the rocking moment of inertia to the mass,








Ratio
RZ

=




κ
rot

J



K
Z

M




,





where Kz is the z spring constant, J is the moment of inertia along one of the rocking axes, M is the mass, and Krot is the rotational spring constant, which for a four spring architecture is roughly








κ
rot




K
z




S
2

8



,





with S being the width of the proof mass. So the frequency ratio reduces to








Ratio
RZ





MS
2


8

J






1

2


2








MS
2

J


·

r
G




=


J
M







is the definition of the radius of gyration, the distance from the axis of rotation of an extended object at which its mass, if concentrated into a point mass, would have the same moment of inertia as the extended object, i.e. appear as a simple pendulum. In other words, =MrG2, so







Ratio
RZ




1

2


2






S

r
G


.







Thus, to operate non-resonantly and ensure that the rocking frequency fr (fx, fy) is higher than the resonant frequency fz, the proof mass can be designed such that







r
G

<


S

2


2



.






For proof masses with large lobes, J is large (i.e. large radius of gyration), so the rocking frequency fx or fy is lower than the z frequency fz. Low moment of inertia is obtained when most of the mass is concentrated beneath the axis. This occurs more naturally for proof masses with simple or “regular” cross sections. Similarly, to have the y rocking frequency fy higher than the x rocking frequency fx, the y axis moment of inertial must be smaller than the x axis moment. This can be accomplished by reducing the proof mass width along the y axis relative to the x axis.


In another embodiment, it is possible to measure angular motion about the z axis as well. In this case the MEMS motion sensor detects motion over 6 degrees of freedom (6 DOF). The x and y angular velocities are measured separately from the z angular velocity. Existing surface micromachined MEMS gyroscopes having small proof masses and sense electrodes require the gyroscope to be operated in a resonant sense mode. Advantageously, the MEMS motion sensor of the present invention can be operated in either a resonant or a non-resonant mode, due to the relatively large proof mass and sense electrodes. For higher sensitivity, the MEMS motion sensor is preferably designed with matched resonant frequencies fx, fy and fz. Alternatively, to reduce the impact temperature, fabrication, and phase sensitivities which are exacerbated by working near the peak of the sense frequency response curve, the MEMS motion sensor can be designed with non-matched resonant frequencies.


The angular velocity around the 6th or z axis is measured in a different way since the drive axis must be along an orthogonal axis. In this case, one of the first and second electrode assemblies is configured to vibrate the proof mass at a drive frequency along a corresponding one of the x and y axes, respectively, the first electrode assembly being configured to detect Coriolis-induced oscillations of the proof mass along the other one of the x and y axes, indicative of an angular motion of the proof mass about the z axis. Preferably, the drive frequency along the corresponding one of the x and y axes corresponds to a respective one of the resonant frequencies fx and fy.


The proof mass is driven along one of the lateral axes, e.g. the x-axis, at the rocking frequency, such as shown in FIG. 9. This rocking motion can be excited by applying an alternating voltage, such as a sine wave or square wave on pairs of electrodes, with alternate top and bottom electrodes in parallel, e.g. using a first electrode assembly formed by 13i and 15ii alternating with another electrode assembly formed by 13ii and 15i. In this way, there is no net vertical displacement of the proof mass 17. The rocking motion causes the center of mass 17 to oscillate along the x axis. The angular velocity around the z axis is manifested as a quadrature signal at the rocking frequency along the y axis and can be measured using an electrode assembly along the y axis, such as 13ii and 13iv.


For a symmetric proof mass, the x and y rocking modes occur at the same frequency, so a matched-mode angular rate measurement is more natural, such as shown in FIG. 8. This approach can be sensitive to dimensional variations, especially through temperature variation, signal bandwidth, and to the phase variations which occur at resonance. Alternatively, in order to operate in a non-resonant sensing mode for z angular rate, the lateral dimensions of the proof mass can be adjusted asymmetrically e.g. wider along one lateral direction than the other, so that the x and y rocking frequencies fx and fy are different, such as shown in FIG. 10. In this case, the resonant structure is shaped, sized and configured with each of the resonant frequencies fx, fy and fz being substantially different. For example, the resonant frequencies fx, fy and fz can have mutually non-overlapping 3 dB-bandwidths.


It will be appreciated that in either one of the matched or unmatched resonant modes, the resonant structure is shaped, sized and configured such that each of the resonant frequencies fx, fy and fz is substantially higher than sensing frequencies at which the electrode assemblies are configured to detect the motion of the proof mass in response to accelerations of the proof mass along to the x, y and z axes, respectively.


Depending of the application of the MEMS motion sensor (3 DOF accelerometer and/or 5 DOF or 6 DOF gyroscope) some of the top and/or bottom electrodes are connectable to driving means, and other ones of the top and/or bottom electrodes are connectable to sensing means. The top and bottom electrodes can also be reconfigurably connectable to driving and sensing means, for switching between drive and sense modes. The terms “driving means” and “sensing means” refer to any electronic circuitry configured to transmit and/or read electric signals.


The proof mass can take different shapes, such as a cross-shape as shown in FIG. 5, or alternatively the proof mass can be shaped as a convex polygonal prism, which is preferably regular. In order to concentrate the mass near the center of gyration, the proof mass can be shaped as an octagonal prism, such as shown in FIG. 9, with four flexible springs on opposed sides, positioned in line with the corners of the proof mass.


As shown in any one of FIGS. 1 to 6, the top and bottom cap wafers 12, 14 have respective thicknesses, the top and bottom electrodes 13, 15 extend through the entire thicknesses of the top and bottom cap wafers, respectively. The top, MEMS and bottom wafers 12, 16, 14 are typically made of silicon-based semiconductor and the MEMS wafer is preferably a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafer, with an insulating layer 24 separating the device layer 20 from the handle layer 22. In the embodiments illustrated, the proof mass is patterned in both the device and the handle layers 20, 22 and the top and bottom electrodes 13, 15 are delimited by insulated channels.


Referring now to FIGS. 11A-11D, these cross sectional views show different insulated, electrically conducting pathways provided in the MEMS motion sensor 10. It is desirable to electrically connect the top cap wafer 12, the MEMS wafer 16 (in this case including the device and handle layers 20, 22) and the bottom cap wafer 14 for different reasons, as will be explained in more detail below. One or more of the insulated conducting pathways include at least a portion extending through the entire thickness of one of the top cap wafer, MEMS wafer, or bottom cap wafer. Some of the insulated conducting pathways are formed by a top cap wafer channel 123, a MEMS wafer channel 163 and a bottom cap channel 143, these channels being aligned at the wafer interfaces (such as shown in FIGS. 11A and 11D) to form the conducting pathways. One or more additional insulated conducting pathways extend through the MEMS wafer 16 and through the top cap wafer 12 only (as shown in FIG. 11B), while yet other additional insulated conducting pathway(s) 37 extend through the top cap wafer only (as shown in FIG. 11C).


Referring to FIG. 11A, it is desirable to isolate one or more bottom cap electrodes 15 and independently feed them up through the MEMS wafer 16 and the top cap wafer 12 to the bond pad 23 on the top cap wafer 12, to electrical contacts 42 part of a given set of contacts. The insulated conducting pathway 33i comprises a top cap wafer channel 123, a MEMS wafer channel 163 and a bottom cap wafer channel 143, the three channels being electrically connected. The top cap wafer channel 123 is formed by a trench 28i surrounding a conductive wafer plug 26i, the trench 28i being filled with an insulating material 30 to isolate the wafer plug 26i. More specifically, the trench 28i has its sidewall coated with the insulating material 30 and optionally the inside of the trench 28i is filled with a conducting material 32 (best shown enlarged in FIG. 12C). The MEMS wafer channel 163 consists of wafer plugs 26ii, 26iii surrounded by closed trenches 28ii, 28iii. The trenches 28ii, 28iii are patterned in the device and handle layers 20, 22 of the MEMS wafer 16. A SOI conducting shunt 34 electrically connects the device and handle layers (and more specifically the plugs 26ii and 26iii), allowing signals to transit through the entire thickness of the MEMS wafer 16. The bottom cap wafer channel 143 is connected to (or forms part of) the bottom cap electrode 15. The insulated conducting channel 33i thus connects the bottom cap electrode 15 and the electrical contact 42 on the top cap wafer 12. This pathway 33i can be used to transmit signals to and from the bottom cap electrode 15, for example to detect a change of capacitance between the top and bottom electrodes 13, 15 when the proof mass 17 moves. Optionally, an electrical contact 43 (in the form of a bond pad 23) can be provided in the bottom cap wafer 14 as well, allowing transmitting signals to/from the bottom cap electrode 15 to the electrical contact 43. It is worth noting that for clarity, not all electrodes are identified in the MEMS device. Of course, some or all of the bottom cap electrodes can be connected to similar insulated conducting pathways.


Referring to FIG. 11B, it is also desirable to be able to isolate parts of the device layer 20 only, such as for MEMS electrodes 19 provided in the device layer. It is also desirable to isolate portions of the device which extend through the entire thickness of the MEMS wafer 16 (combining the handle layer 22, the device layer 20, and the insulating layer 24) in order to feed signals from the proof mass 17 through the top cap wafer 12 to electrical contacts (such as bond pads). In FIG. 11B, an additional insulated conducting pathway 35 extends through the MEMS wafer 16 and through the top cap wafer 12, connecting the pendulous proof mass 17 to one of the electrical contacts 42 on the top cap wafer 12. In this case, this additional insulated conducting pathway 35 includes a top cap wafer channel 123 and a MEMS wafer channel 163. The top cap wafer channel 123 is formed by a wafer portion 26i surrounded by a closed trench 28i, the trench 28i being filled with an insulating material and optionally with a conducting material. The MEMS wafer channel 163 is delimited in part by a portion of the buried oxide layer 24i and by the cavity 31 housing the proof mass 17. A SOI conducting shunt 34 allows connecting the device and handle layers in the MEMS structure 17. Given that the bond between the top cap wafer 12 and the MEMS wafer 16 are conductive, the top cap wafer channel 123 and the MEMS wafer channel 163 are electrically connected, and thus form the additional insulated conducting pathway 35. This pathway can be used, for example, to send a signal to the proof mass 17.


Referring to FIG. 11C, top cap electrodes 13 on the top cap wafer 12 can also be isolated and connected to electrical contacts 42, part of a different set of contacts. This is done with other additional insulated conducting pathways, extending through the top cap wafer 12 between the top cap electrodes 13 and the bond pads 23. In FIG. 11C, an example of such a pathway, identified with reference 37, permits the transmission of electrical signals between the top cap electrode 13 and the corresponding electrical contact 42, in this case the bond pad 23. The insulated conducting pathway 37 is delimited in part by the buried oxide forming the insulating layer 24 and by the cavity 31.


Referring to FIG. 11D, electrical contacts 43, such as bond pads, can also be located on bottom cap 14 to pass signals through the MEMS device 10, for example, from an Integrated Circuit (IC) on top, through the MEMS device 10, to an underlying IC or Printed Circuit Board (PCB). The outer side 142 of the bottom cap wafer 14 has electrical contact(s) 43, such as bond pads 23, and the insulated conducting pathways is a device feedthrough 25 extending from the electrical contacts 42 on the top cap wafer 12 to the electrical contacts 43 on the bottom cap wafer 14. The insulated conducting pathway is formed in the top and bottom cap wafers 12, 14 by trenches 28i, 28iv filled with an insulating material, and optionally with a conducting material inside the insulated trenches; and by trenches 28ii, 28iii formed in the device and handle layers 20, 22. The trenches 28ii, 28iii surround respective silicon wafer plugs 26i, 26ii, connected by an SOI conducting shunt 34.


Manufacturing Method


The motion sensor is a multi-wafer stack consisting of top and bottom cap wafers containing sense electrodes and the center MEMS wafer containing the proof mass and springs. As described previously, the stack is combined with insulated conducting pathways, which can also be referred to as electrically isolated “3 dimensional through-chip vias” (3DTCVs) to route signals from electrodes on the bottom cap and MEMS wafer through the MEMS wafer to and through the top cap wafer to bond pads on the surface, thus providing a means of monitoring the position of the proof mass in three-dimensional space.


The method for manufacturing the MEMS device will be described in connection with a preferred embodiment. However, it will be understood that there is no intent to limit the invention to the embodiment described.


Referring to FIGS. 12, 12A-11B, 13 and 13A, to begin construction of the MEMS motion sensor according to a possible embodiment, top and bottom cap wafers are provided. The top wafer 12 has an inner side 121 and an outer side 122, and the bottom cap wafer 14 has an inner side 141 and an outer side 142. The top and bottom cap wafers 12, 14 are preferably silicon-based wafers. Insulated conducting cap wafer channels 123, 143 are formed on the inner sides 121, 141 of the cap wafers 12, 14. Trenches 28 are patterned on the inner sides 121, 141, the trenches 28 extending only partially through the cap wafers 12, 14. The trenches 28 of the top and bottom cap wafers 12, 14 are then filled with an insulating material 30, and optionally with a conducting material 32 as well (as best shown in FIG. 12C). For some embodiments of the device, it may be required to pattern a recess 38, at least in the top cap wafer 12 to form part of a cavity which will eventually house the proof mass. The bottom cap wafer 14 can also be patterned with a similar recess 38. The top cap wafer 12 can also be patterned with trenches 28, and the trenches 28 being filled with an insulating material to form top cap electrodes 13 and/or leads. Preferably, the bottom cap wafer is also patterned is a similar fashion to create bottom cap electrodes 15 and leads. Numerous processes are available at different MEMS fabrication facilities and the insulating and conducting materials 30, 32 vary between them. In this embodiment, islands of conducting wafer (typically silicon) in the shape of the channels 123, 143 and electrodes 13, 15 are surrounded by insulating barriers, patterned into the silicon with a sufficient depth greater than the final desired cap thickness.


Referring to FIGS. 14, 14A-14B, a MEMS wafer 16 is provided, having first and second sides 161, 162. Portions of the proof mass and the four flexural springs, and portions of insulated conducting MEMS wafer channels, are patterned in the first or top side 161 of the MEMS wafer 16. It would also be possible to first pattern the second or bottom side 162 instead. In this embodiment, the MEMS wafer 16 is an SOI wafer with an insulating layer 24 separating the device layer 20 from the handle layer 22. SOI conducting shunts 34 are formed through the device layer 20 and the insulating layer 24 (typically buried oxide), by first opening vias in the device and insulating layer 20, 24, and possibly slightly in the handle layer 24, and by filling the vias with a conducting material, such as doped polycrystalline silicon (polysilicon), metal, or other conducting material. In this way, a SOI conducting shunt 34 is formed vertically between the device and handle layers 20, 22 at desired spots.


Referring to FIGS. 15 and 15A, trenches 28 surrounding some of the SOI conducting shunts 34 are etched for forming the portions of insulated conducting MEMS wafer channels (such as feedthoughs). In some embodiments, this step can include etching trenches 28 in the device layer 20 for forming other MEMS structures and elements.


Referring to FIGS. 16 and 16A, the side of the MEMS wafer patterned in the previous step is bonded to the inner side of the top or bottom cap wafer by aligning the insulated conducting cap wafer channels of the cap wafer 12 with the remaining portions of the insulated conducting MEMS channels 163i. In this example, it is the first side 161 of the MEMS wafer that is bonded to the top cap wafer 12. Of course, it would have been possible to first pattern the handle layer and to bond it with the patterned bottom cap wafer. Bonding the top cap wafer 12 to the first side 161 of the MEMS wafer 16 is done with a conductive bond. Preferably, fusion bonding is used, but other alternatives can be considered, such as using a conducting material. Bonding can be made for example using gold thermocompression bonding, or gold-silicon eutectic bonding. In this embodiment where the MEMS wafer is a SOI wafer, the top cap wafer 12 is aligned and bonded to the SOI device layer 20 on the MEMS wafer 16. The feedthrough pads on the SOI Device layer 20 are aligned to the corresponding pads on the top cap wafer 12 and the electrodes 13 on the top cap wafer 12 are aligned to the relevant electrodes 19 on the MEMS wafer 16.


Referring to FIGS. 17 and 17A, the remaining portions of the proof mass 17 and the remaining portions 163ii of the insulated conducting MEMS wafer channels 163 are patterned on the other side 162 of the MEMS wafer 16. This step can be conducted by etching trenches 28 to form the remaining portion of the proof mass 17 and to form conductive wafer plugs 26 part of the insulated conducting MEMS wafer channel 163. In the present example, the other side corresponds to the handle layer 22, and the proof mass and electrodes are aligned to similar elements, such as electrodes and springs on the device layer 20.


In this example, the MEMS wafer channel 163 will eventually form part of a device feedthrough, located in the periphery of the handle layer 22. Trenches 28 are etched around the conductive silicon wafer plug 26 to isolate it from the rest of the layer 22. The SOI conducting shunt 34 in the device and insulating layers 20, 24 provides electrical conductivity within the channel 163. If there were no shunt 34, the silicon plug would merely be a mechanical support.


Referring to FIGS. 18 and 18A, the side 162 of the MEMS wafer 16 patterned in the previous step is next bonded to the inner side 141 of the other cap wafer, which in this case is the bottom cap wafer 14. The bonding step is made by aligning the electrodes of the top cap wafer 12 with the electrodes of the bottom cap wafer 14. As illustrated, electrodes 13i, 13ii and 13v are aligned with electrodes 15i, 15ii and 15v. The insulated conducting cap wafer channels are also aligned with the remaining portions of the insulated conducting MEMS channels, creating insulated conducting pathways. Some of the insulated conducting pathways, such as pathway 33i, extend from an electrode 15i in the bottom cap wafer 12, through the outer frame of the MEMS wafer 16 and through the top cap wafer 14. The caps 12, 14 thereby enclose the proof mass 17 which is suspended by springs (not shown in FIG. 18A) relative to the outer frame 164 within the cavity 31, formed by the top and bottom cap wafers 12, 14 and by the outer frame 164 of the MEMS wafer 16.


Similar to the bonding of the other cap wafer, the bond is a conductive bond, which can be performed using various bonding method such as fusion bonding or bonding with a conducting material, such as gold thermocompression bonding or gold-silicon eutectic bonding for example. The bond is used to provide electrical contact between the channels in the MEMS wafer and the channels in the cap wafer 14, some of which are connected electrically to the bottom electrodes 15. In this manner, a conductive pathway 33i is provided from a bottom electrode 15 through the bottom cap silicon pad, handle feedthrough, SOI conducting shunt, and SOI device layer pad to the top cap wafer pad. At this point the MEMS wafer 16 is hermetically sealed between the cap wafers 12, 14. The proof mass is aligned with electrodes of the top cap and/or bottom cap and/or any handle side electrodes. Because the insulating channels do not yet fully penetrate the caps, the electrodes (such those illustrated—13i, 13ii, 13v and 15i 15ii and 15v) on each cap are shorted together through the remaining silicon.


Referring to FIG. 19A, a portion of the outer sides 122, 142 of the top and bottom cap wafers 12, 14 is removed to expose and isolate the insulated conducting pathway 33i and feedthrough 25. This step can be conducted by grinding and polishing the outer sides of the top and bottom cap wafers. Preferably, the outer sides of the top and bottom cap wafers 12, 14 are electrically passivated with a cap insulating layer 40. In the example shown, only the side 122 of the top cap is removed and passivated, since other optional steps are conducted afterwards. It should be noted that it is possible to grind the outer side of both the top and bottom cap wafers, passivate them, and stop the process at this point, such that the next steps are performed later, in the same or in a different plant. Indeed, in this step, insulated conducting pathways are formed which extend from the bottom cap wafer, through MEMS wafer, to the cap wafer.


However, manufacturing the MEMS motion sensor 10 typically comprises the step of forming electrical contacts on at least the outer side 122 of the top cap wafer 12. The electrical contacts on the top cap are connected with the insulated conducting pathway 33i and feedthrough 25, and allow to route electrical signals from the bottom cap wafer 14 to the electrical contacts on the top cap wafer 12. Preferably, the method further comprises forming electrical contacts on the outer side 142 of the bottom cap wafer 14 as well. These electrical contacts 43, being connected to some of the insulated conducting pathway 33i, allow the routing of electrical signals from the conducting pathway 33i to the electrical contacts on the bottom cap wafer 14.


This step of forming electrical contacts on the outer sides of the top and/or bottom cap wafers can be accomplished as follows. The procedure is illustrated for one side of the MEMS device only, but of course the same steps can be performed on the other side as well.


Referring to FIG. 20, openings 39 are created in the cap insulating layer 40 on the outer side 122 of cap wafer 12, in line with the insulated conducting wafer cap channels 123.


Referring to FIG. 21, a metallic layer 41 is applied on the cap insulating layer 40. As shown in FIG. 22, the metallic layer 41 is then patterned to form electrical leads 36 and bond pads 23. Finally, as shown in FIG. 23, a passivating film 45 is applied over the electrical leads 36 and the bond pads 23. The passivating film protects electrical leads 36 which can extend along the top surface of the cap wafers. At this point, if electrical contacts are desired in the bottom cap, the process steps shown in FIGS. 20 through 23 can be repeated on the bottom wafer as further shown in FIG. 23. As shown in FIG. 24A, openings are then created in the passivating film 45 over the bond pads 23. In this way, the insulated conducting pathways from the top, sides, and bottom of the MEMS device are accessible from at least the top cap wafer 12 for wire bonding, flip-chip bonding, or wafer bonding.


Referring to FIGS. 25A-25C, since the bond pads are on the first or top side of the MEMS motion sensor, the described 3DTCV architecture provides the packaging flexibility of a 2D chip (such as comb-sensors) for 3D MEMS motion sensor and is compatible with CMOS circuitry for sensing and driving the proof mass via electrical signals. The MEMS motion sensor 10 can for example be mounted side-by-side with, and wire bonded to, the sensing IC 44.


A possible embodiment of a completed IMU is shown in 25C. At this point in the process the MEMS IMU wafer is still in wafer form. For wafer scale system packaging, the I/O bond pads of the MEMS IMU and feedthroughs are designed to match the I/O pads of the sense electronics IC. The sense electronics IC wafer 44 can then be flip chip bonded directly to the top of the MEMS IMU wafer using an underfill and solder-bump wafer bonding process. These wafer bonding processes are known in the semiconductor industry and any can be used by implementing the appropriate bond pad and solder metallurgies. The bonded wafers can be diced into chips, or “MEMS IMU cubes”. The diced and hermetically sealed IMU cubes can be treated as packaged chips ready to be solder-attached to other chips, multi-chip package, or PC (printed circuit) board.


The benefits of this approach are:

  • 1) The MEMS motion sensor and IC can be matched in size with the bond pad layout so that at singulation, no IC bond pads extend outward beyond the extent of the MEMS chip and the MEMS chip does not have to include any wasted area that is cut away to expose the bond pads. Both the MEMS sensor and IC wafers can be used more efficiently. This enables true MEMS/IC wafer scale packaging since dicing results in usable packaged devices.
  • 2) Bond wires are eliminated between the MEMS and the IC and between the IMU system and the processing electronics. This eliminates stray inductance and capacitance that can affect measurements, as well as the additional cost of wire bonding.
  • 3) No Through Silicon Vias (TSVs) are required in the IC wafer. This reduces IC costs by eliminating the additional processes required at the IC foundry to produce TSVs, eliminates the IC space required for the TSVs, and opens up sourcing for the IC wafers since many IC foundries do not have TSV capabilities.
  • 4) The 3DTCV architecture enables through-MEMS-chip IC Input/Output without adding any additional TSV processes beyond those already used to fabricate the MEMS IMU itself. The only additional process steps are the contact etch and bond pad metallization required for the bottom cap.


The figures illustrate only an exemplary embodiment of the invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, as the invention may admit to other equally effective or equivalent embodiments. The scope of the claims should not be limited by the preferred embodiments set forth in the examples, but should be given the broadest interpretation consistent with the description as a whole.

Claims
  • 1. A MEMS motion sensor comprising: an electrically conductive MEMS silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafer including an insulating layer separating a device layer from a handle layer, the MEMS SOI wafer having a first side and a second side and including an outer frame, a proof mass and a plurality of flexible springs suspending the proof mass relative to the outer frame and enabling the proof mass to move relative to the outer frame along mutually orthogonal x, y and z axes, the plurality of springs formed in the device layer;an electrically conductive silicon top cap wafer and an electrically conductive silicon bottom cap wafer respectively bonded to the first side and the second side of the MEMS SOI wafer such that the top cap wafer, the bottom cap wafer and the outer frame of the MEMS SOI wafer define a cavity for housing the proof mass;a plurality of top cap wafer electrodes and a plurality of bottom cap wafer electrodes that are respectively positioned with the top cap wafer and the bottom cap wafer, the electrodes forming capacitors with the proof mass that are configured to detect at least one of translational and rotational motion of the proof mass, wherein a detected rotational motion includes an angular motion of the proof mass about at least one of the x, y, and z axes;a plurality of insulated conducting pathways, each insulated conducting pathway conducting signals through at least a portion of each of the silicon top cap wafer, the MEMS SOI wafer, and the silicon bottom cap wafer; anda first set of electrical contacts on a top surface of the top cap wafer and connected to the plurality of top cap wafer electrodes, a second set of electrical contacts on the top surface of the top cap wafer being connected to the bottom cap wafer electrodes via at least one of the plurality of insulated conducting pathways, and a third set of electrical contacts connected to the proof mass.
  • 2. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 1, wherein the proof mass and flexible springs form a resonant structure having resonant frequencies fx, fy and fz for motion along the x, y and z axes, respectively.
  • 3. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 2, comprising electrode assemblies, each including at least one pair of said top cap electrodes, or at least one pair of said bottom cap electrodes or a combination of said top cap electrodes and bottom cap electrodes, said electrode assemblies comprising: a first electrode assembly configured to detect a rocking motion of the proof mass about the y axis, indicative of an acceleration of the proof mass along the x axis;a second electrode assembly configured to detect a rocking motion of the proof mass about the x axis, indicative of an acceleration of the proof mass along the y axis; anda third electrode assembly configured to detect a translational motion of the proof mass along the z axis, indicative of an acceleration of the proof mass along the z axis.
  • 4. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 3, wherein one of the electrode assemblies is connectable to a drive circuit configured to vibrate the proof mass at a drive frequency along the z axis, and two other of the electrode assemblies are configured to detect Coriolis-induced oscillations of the proof mass along the x and y axes, indicative of an angular motion of the proof mass about the y and x axes, respectively.
  • 5. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 4, wherein the drive frequency corresponds to the resonant frequency fz.
  • 6. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 4, wherein the resonant frequency fz is substantially identical to each of the respective resonant frequencies fx, fy, in order to provide matched resonance conditions.
  • 7. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 4, wherein a relative difference between any two of the resonant frequencies fz, fx, fy is no more than 10%.
  • 8. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 4, wherein the drive frequency is lower than at least one of the respective resonant frequencies fx and fy.
  • 9. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 4, wherein the drive frequency is 10-40% lower than each of the respective resonant frequencies fx and fy.
  • 10. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 3, wherein one of the electrode assemblies is configured to vibrate the proof mass at a drive frequency along a corresponding one of the x and y axes, respectively, and another one of the electrode assemblies is configured to detect Coriolis-induced oscillations of the proof mass along the other one of the x and y axes, indicative of the angular motion of the proof mass about the z axis.
  • 11. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 10, wherein the drive frequency along the corresponding one of the x and y axes corresponds to a respective one of the resonant frequencies fx and fy.
  • 12. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 3, wherein the resonant structure is shaped, sized and configured such that each of the resonant frequencies fx, fy and fz is substantially higher than sensing frequencies at which the electrode assemblies are configurable with a sensing circuit to detect the motion of the proof mass in response to accelerations of the proof mass along the x, y and z axes, respectively.
  • 13. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 1, wherein the flexible springs and the proof mass comprises a resonant structure that is shaped, sized and configured with each of the resonant frequencies fx, fy and fz being substantially different.
  • 14. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 13, wherein the resonant structure is shaped, sized and configured with the resonant frequencies fx, fy and fz having mutually non-overlapping 3 dB-bandwidths.
  • 15. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 1, wherein said top and bottom cap electrodes comprise pairs of said top and bottom electrodes that are aligned with the z axis, the electrodes being centered relative to the proof mass.
  • 16. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 1, wherein said top and bottom cap electrodes comprise two pairs of said top and bottom electrodes disposed along the x axis on each side of the y axis.
  • 17. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 1, wherein said top cap electrodes and bottom cap electrodes comprise two pairs of said top and bottom electrodes disposed along the y axis on each side of the x axis.
  • 18. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 1, wherein the proof mass is shaped as a convex polygonal prism.
  • 19. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 1, wherein the proof mass is shaped as a regular convex polygonal prism.
  • 20. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 1, wherein the proof mass is shaped as an octagonal prism.
  • 21. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 1, wherein the flexible springs comprise four flexible springs.
  • 22. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 1, wherein the top and bottom cap wafers have respective thicknesses, the top cap wafer electrodes and bottom cap wafer electrodes extending through the entire thicknesses of the top and bottom cap wafers, respectively.
  • 23. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 1, wherein the proof mass comprises an SOT proof mass having a device layer, an insulating layer, and a handle layer, the SOT proof mass having a thickness in a range of 400 to 700 microns.
  • 24. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 1, wherein at least one of the plurality of insulated conducting pathways extends through the insulating layer with a conducting shunt to connect a corresponding contact of the second set of electrical contacts to a corresponding electrode of the plurality of bottom cap wafer electrodes.
  • 25. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 1, wherein the proof mass is patterned in both the device and handle layers.
  • 26. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 1, wherein the top cap wafer electrodes and the bottom cap wafer electrodes are delimited by insulated channels.
  • 27. The MEMS motion sensor according to claim 1, wherein each of the bottom cap wafer and top cap wafer is provided with at least one electrical contact, the MEMS motion sensor comprising an additional insulated conducting pathway extending through the bottom cap wafer, through the MEMS SOT wafer, and through the top cap wafer along the z axis and optionally in an x-y plane, between one of the electrical contacts of the top cap wafer and one of the electrical contacts of the bottom cap wafer, thereby forming a conductive feedthrough.
  • 28. The MEMS motion sensor of claim 1 wherein the first set of contacts, second set of contacts, and third set of contacts are on the top cap wafer.
  • 29. The MEMS motion sensor of claim 1 wherein the first set of contacts, second set of contacts, and third set of contacts are on the bottom cap wafer.
  • 30. The MEMS motion sensor of claim 1 wherein said rotational motion further comprises rotation about the x axis, the y axis, or a combination thereof.
  • 31. The MEMS motion sensor of claim 1 wherein the motion sensor is configured to detect an angular rotation rate about the x axis, the y axis and the z axis.
  • 32. The MEMS motion sensor of claim 1 wherein the proof mass comprises a silicon layer on an insulated substrate, the silicon layer being conductively connected to at least one of the third electrical contacts.
  • 33. The MEMS motion sensor of claim 1 wherein the motion sensor detects at least 3 degrees of freedom of motion of the proof mass about the x axis, the y axis and the z axis.
  • 34. The MEMS motion sensor of claim 33 wherein the top cap wafer has at least five electrodes.
  • 35. The MEMS motion sensor of claim 1 wherein the MEMS SOI wafer, the silicon top cap wafer and the silicon bottom cap wafer each comprise a semiconductor wafer.
  • 36. The MEMS motion sensor of claim 1 wherein the motion sensor comprises a gyroscope.
  • 37. The MEMS motion sensor of claim 1 wherein the proof mass is hermetically sealed within the cavity.
  • 38. The MEMS motion sensor of claim 1 wherein the MEMS SOI wafer is fusion bonded to the silicon top cap wafer and the silicon bottom cap wafer.
  • 39. The MEMS motion sensor of claim 1 wherein the motion sensor comprises an inertial measurement unit (IMU).
  • 40. The MEMS motion sensor of claim 39 wherein the inertial measurement unit (IMU) is mounted to a printed circuit board, the printed circuit board further having an integrated circuit.
  • 41. The MEMS motion sensor of claim 39 wherein the inertial measurement unit (IMU) comprises a first MEMS motion sensor and a second MEMS motion sensor mounted in a multi-chip package that measures 5 or 6 degrees of freedom.
  • 42. The MEMS motion sensor of claim 1 further comprising bottom cap wafer contacts connected to one or more of the electrodes and wherein the third set of electrical contacts are on the top surface of the top cap wafer.
  • 43. A MEMS motion sensor comprising: an electrically conductive MEMS silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafer having a first side and a second side and including an outer frame, a proof mass and a spring suspending the proof mass relative to the outer frame and enabling the proof mass to move relative to the outer frame along at least one axis, the proof mass including a device layer, an insulating layer and a handle layer, the spring formed in the device layer;an electrically conductive silicon top cap wafer and an electrically conductive silicon bottom cap wafer respectively bonded to the first side and the second side of the MEMS SOI wafer such that the top cap wafer, the bottom cap wafer and the outer frame of the MEMS SOI wafer define a cavity for housing the proof mass;at least one top cap wafer electrode, the at least one top cap wafer electrode detecting at least one of translational and rotational motion of the proof mass; anda first electrical contact on or above the top cap wafer and connected to the top cap wafer electrode, a second electrical contact connected to the proof mass, and a third electrical contact connected to the bottom cap wafer.
  • 44. The MEMS motion sensor of claim 43 wherein the spring is one of a plurality of flexible springs.
  • 45. The MEMS motion sensor of claim 43, wherein the spring electrically connects the proof mass to the second electrical contact.
  • 46. The MEMS motion sensor of claim 43, wherein at least one of the top cap wafer and the bottom cap wafer includes a trench filled with insulating material.
  • 47. The MEMS motion sensor of claim 43, further comprising at least one insulated conducting pathway that conducts signals between the first electrical contact and the bottom cap wafer wherein the insulating conducting pathway includes an SOI conducting shunt in the MEMS SOI wafer that electrically connects the device layer and the handle layer.
  • 48. The MEMS motion sensor of claim 43, where in the top cap wafer is fusion bonded to the first side of the MEMS SOI wafer and the bottom cap wafer is fusion bonded to the second side of the MEMS SOI wafer.
  • 49. The MEMS motion sensor of claim 43, where in the proof mass has a thickness in a range from 400 to 700 microns.
  • 50. The MEMS motion sensor of claim 43, where in the proof mass has a conducting shunt connecting the device layer and the handle layer.
  • 51. The MEMS motion sensor of claim 43, wherein the MEMS motion sensor is mounted to a printed circuit board to form a chip package, the chip package including an integrated circuit connected to the MEMS motion sensor.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application is a continuation-in-part of international application no. PCT/CA2014/050730 filed on Aug. 1, 2014, which claims priority from U.S. application No. 61/861,786 filed on Aug. 2, 2013 and from U.S. application No. 61/861,821 filed on Aug. 2, 2013. The disclosures of each of these applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (416)
Number Name Date Kind
4430895 Colton Feb 1984 A
4483194 Rudolf Nov 1984 A
4553436 Hansson Nov 1985 A
4590801 Merhav May 1986 A
4592233 Peters Jun 1986 A
4805456 Howe Feb 1989 A
4833417 Schroeder May 1989 A
4881408 Hulsing Nov 1989 A
4882933 Petersen Nov 1989 A
4905523 Okada Mar 1990 A
4967605 Okada Nov 1990 A
5177661 Zavracky et al. Jan 1993 A
5235457 Lichtman et al. Aug 1993 A
5239984 Cane et al. Aug 1993 A
5359893 Dunn Nov 1994 A
5557046 Hulsing Sep 1996 A
5596144 Swanson Jan 1997 A
5608210 Esparza et al. Mar 1997 A
5614742 Gessner Mar 1997 A
5623270 Kempkes et al. Apr 1997 A
5635639 Greiff et al. Jun 1997 A
5646346 Okada Jul 1997 A
5662111 Cosman Sep 1997 A
5777226 Ip Jul 1998 A
5831163 Okada Nov 1998 A
5894090 Tang Apr 1999 A
5895850 Buestgens Apr 1999 A
5898223 Frye Apr 1999 A
5920011 Hulsing Jul 1999 A
5959206 Ryrko Sep 1999 A
5962784 Hulsing Oct 1999 A
5977640 Bertin Nov 1999 A
5987985 Okada Nov 1999 A
5992233 Clark Nov 1999 A
6003371 Okada Dec 1999 A
6028773 Hundt Feb 2000 A
6053057 Okada Apr 2000 A
6058778 Chan May 2000 A
6079272 Stell Jun 2000 A
6090638 Vigna Jul 2000 A
6091132 Bryant Jul 2000 A
6119517 Breng Sep 2000 A
6122961 Geen Sep 2000 A
6159773 Lin Dec 2000 A
6184052 Vigna Feb 2001 B1
6225699 Ference May 2001 B1
6235550 Chan May 2001 B1
6257057 Hulsing Jul 2001 B1
6282956 Okada Sep 2001 B1
6295870 Hulsing Oct 2001 B1
6391673 Ha May 2002 B1
6399997 Lin Jun 2002 B1
6469330 Vigna Oct 2002 B1
6487000 Mastromatteo Nov 2002 B2
6490923 Breng Dec 2002 B1
6508124 Zerbini Jan 2003 B1
6539801 Gutierrez Apr 2003 B1
6584845 Gutierrez Jul 2003 B1
6587312 Murari Jul 2003 B2
6621137 Ma Sep 2003 B1
6651500 Stewart Nov 2003 B2
6675630 Challoner Jan 2004 B2
6696364 Gelmi Feb 2004 B2
6701786 Hulsing Mar 2004 B2
6705167 Kvisteroey Mar 2004 B2
6715353 Johnson Apr 2004 B2
6718823 Platt Apr 2004 B2
6766689 Durante Jul 2004 B2
6772632 Okada Aug 2004 B2
6808952 Sniegowski et al. Oct 2004 B1
6808955 Ma Oct 2004 B2
6829937 Mahon Dec 2004 B2
6841861 Brady Jan 2005 B2
6856144 Lasalandra Feb 2005 B2
6863832 Wiemer Mar 2005 B1
6865943 Okada Mar 2005 B2
6892575 Nasiri May 2005 B2
6925875 Silverbrook Aug 2005 B2
6939473 Nasiri Sep 2005 B2
6942750 Chou Sep 2005 B2
6944931 Shcheglov Sep 2005 B2
6953985 Lin Oct 2005 B2
6978673 Johnson et al. Dec 2005 B2
6990863 Challoner Jan 2006 B2
6991957 Eskridge Jan 2006 B2
6993617 Butcher Jan 2006 B2
7017410 Challoner Mar 2006 B2
7040163 Shcheglov May 2006 B2
7043985 Ayazi May 2006 B2
7056757 Ayazi Jun 2006 B2
7093486 Challoner Aug 2006 B2
7100448 Ikegami Sep 2006 B2
7104129 Nasiri Sep 2006 B2
7138694 Nunan Nov 2006 B2
7159441 Challoner Jan 2007 B2
7160752 Ouellet et al. Jan 2007 B2
7168317 Chen et al. Jan 2007 B2
7168318 Challoner Jan 2007 B2
7176556 Okamoto Feb 2007 B2
7180019 Chiou Feb 2007 B1
7210351 Lo May 2007 B2
7217588 Hartzell May 2007 B2
7238999 LaFond Jul 2007 B2
7247246 Nasiri Jul 2007 B2
7250112 Nasiri Jul 2007 B2
7250353 Nasiri Jul 2007 B2
7258008 Durante Aug 2007 B2
7258011 Nasiri Aug 2007 B2
7258012 Xie Aug 2007 B2
7275424 Felton Oct 2007 B2
7291561 Ma Nov 2007 B2
7318349 Vaganov Jan 2008 B2
7322236 Combi Jan 2008 B2
7322237 Kutsuna Jan 2008 B2
7337671 Ayazi Mar 2008 B2
7347095 Shcheglov Mar 2008 B2
7360423 Ayazi Apr 2008 B2
7402905 Eskridge et al. Jul 2008 B2
7417329 Chuang Aug 2008 B2
7442570 Chuang Aug 2008 B2
7458263 Nasiri Dec 2008 B2
7484410 Tsuji Feb 2009 B2
7491567 DCamp Feb 2009 B2
7518493 Bryzek et al. Apr 2009 B2
7541588 Tabirian et al. Jun 2009 B2
7543496 Ayazi Jun 2009 B2
7578189 Mehregany Aug 2009 B1
7615406 Higashi Nov 2009 B2
7617729 Axelrod et al. Nov 2009 B2
7621183 Seeger Nov 2009 B2
7624494 Challoner Dec 2009 B2
7642115 Eriksen et al. Jan 2010 B2
7642657 Suilleabhain Jan 2010 B2
7677099 Nasiri Mar 2010 B2
7684101 Border et al. Mar 2010 B2
7689321 Karlsson Mar 2010 B2
7690254 Pilchowski et al. Apr 2010 B2
7694563 Durante Apr 2010 B2
7748272 Kranz Jul 2010 B2
7755367 Schoen Jul 2010 B2
7767483 Waters Aug 2010 B1
7767484 Ayazi Aug 2010 B2
7784344 Pavelescu Aug 2010 B2
7786572 Chen Aug 2010 B2
7790608 Lauxtermann et al. Sep 2010 B2
7795723 Chau et al. Sep 2010 B2
7810379 DeNatale et al. Oct 2010 B2
7851898 Nakamura Dec 2010 B2
7863698 Seeger Jan 2011 B2
7875942 Cortese Jan 2011 B2
7882740 Okada Feb 2011 B2
7886601 Merassi Feb 2011 B2
7898043 Ziglioli Mar 2011 B2
7908921 Binda Mar 2011 B2
7928632 Yang Apr 2011 B2
7929143 Wilfinger et al. Apr 2011 B2
7934423 Nasiri May 2011 B2
7964428 Breng Jun 2011 B2
7971483 Supino et al. Jul 2011 B2
7982291 Kuisma Jul 2011 B2
7982558 Sworowski Jul 2011 B2
7987714 DeNatale et al. Aug 2011 B2
8042394 Coronato Oct 2011 B2
8047075 Nasiri Nov 2011 B2
8049515 Schoen Nov 2011 B2
8069726 Seeger Dec 2011 B2
8071398 Yang Dec 2011 B1
8077372 Border et al. Dec 2011 B2
8080869 Okudo Dec 2011 B2
8084332 Nasiri Dec 2011 B2
8100012 Martin Jan 2012 B2
8124895 Merassi Feb 2012 B2
8134214 Baldo Mar 2012 B2
8151640 Kubena Apr 2012 B1
8166816 Ayazi et al. May 2012 B2
8176782 Furukubo May 2012 B2
8220328 Rudolf et al. Jul 2012 B2
8227285 Yang Jul 2012 B1
8227911 Yang Jul 2012 B1
8230740 Katsuki et al. Jul 2012 B2
8236577 Hsu Aug 2012 B1
8258590 Geiger Sep 2012 B2
8272266 Zhang Sep 2012 B2
8283737 Sugizaki Sep 2012 B2
8289092 Pomarico Oct 2012 B2
8297121 Quer et al. Oct 2012 B2
8314483 Lin Nov 2012 B2
8324047 Yang Dec 2012 B1
8347717 Seeger Jan 2013 B2
8350346 Huang Jan 2013 B1
8365595 Geiger Feb 2013 B2
8368153 Huang et al. Feb 2013 B2
8372677 Mehregany Feb 2013 B2
8375789 Prandi Feb 2013 B2
8384134 Daneman Feb 2013 B2
8390173 Yoshihara et al. Mar 2013 B2
8395252 Yang Mar 2013 B1
8395381 Lo Mar 2013 B2
8402666 Hsu Mar 2013 B1
8405170 Kohl Mar 2013 B2
8407905 Hsu Mar 2013 B1
8413506 Coronato Apr 2013 B2
8421082 Yang Apr 2013 B1
8426961 Shih Apr 2013 B2
8432005 Yang Apr 2013 B2
8433084 Conti Apr 2013 B2
8445307 Yeh et al. May 2013 B2
8459093 Donadel Jun 2013 B2
8459110 Cazzaniga Jun 2013 B2
8461935 McCraith Jun 2013 B2
8481365 Verhelijden Jul 2013 B2
8486744 Lin et al. Jul 2013 B2
8487444 Law Jul 2013 B2
8490461 Sasaki Jul 2013 B2
8490483 Wrede Jul 2013 B2
8497557 Tanaka Jul 2013 B2
8508039 Nasiri Aug 2013 B1
8508045 Khan Aug 2013 B2
8513747 Huang et al. Aug 2013 B1
8519537 Jeng Aug 2013 B2
8567246 Shaeffer Oct 2013 B2
8569090 Taheri Oct 2013 B2
8587077 Chen Nov 2013 B2
8593036 Boysel Nov 2013 B2
8614110 Waters et al. Dec 2013 B1
8637943 Yang Jan 2014 B1
8652961 Yang Feb 2014 B1
8675181 Hall Mar 2014 B2
8685776 LaFond Apr 2014 B2
8704238 Yang Apr 2014 B2
8748206 Horning Jun 2014 B2
8759926 Fujii et al. Jun 2014 B2
8810030 Geisberger Aug 2014 B2
8826514 Papavasiliou et al. Sep 2014 B2
8869616 Sridharamurthy Oct 2014 B1
8885170 Kilic Nov 2014 B2
8919199 Judy et al. Dec 2014 B2
8921145 Shu Dec 2014 B2
RE45439 Prandi et al. Mar 2015 E
9013233 Elmallah et al. Apr 2015 B2
9046541 Kubena et al. Jun 2015 B1
9061891 Supino et al. Jun 2015 B2
9063549 Pennecot et al. Jun 2015 B1
9085455 Cheng et al. Jul 2015 B2
9309106 Boysel et al. Apr 2016 B2
9340414 Yoneoka et al. May 2016 B2
9409768 DeNatale et al. Aug 2016 B2
9567204 Hung et al. Feb 2017 B2
9594128 Farghaly et al. Mar 2017 B2
9709595 Vohra et al. Jul 2017 B2
9751754 Kurashima et al. Sep 2017 B2
9784835 Droz et al. Oct 2017 B1
9837935 Johnson et al. Dec 2017 B2
9945950 Newman et al. Apr 2018 B2
9981841 Chu et al. May 2018 B2
10365131 Grossman et al. Jul 2019 B2
10392244 Hung et al. Aug 2019 B2
10598689 Zwahlen et al. Mar 2020 B2
10768065 Boysel Sep 2020 B2
10793421 Rajasekaran et al. Oct 2020 B2
11060866 Blomqvist et al. Jul 2021 B2
11287486 Boysel Mar 2022 B2
20010011994 Morimoto Aug 2001 A1
20020040602 Okada Apr 2002 A1
20030094046 Okada May 2003 A1
20030209075 Okada Nov 2003 A1
20040052016 Takagi Mar 2004 A1
20040063239 Yun et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040211258 Geen Oct 2004 A1
20040224279 Siemons Nov 2004 A1
20040231422 Okada Nov 2004 A1
20050076719 Jakobsen et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050166677 Nasir et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050210981 Okada Sep 2005 A1
20050242991 Montgomery et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060163453 Hynes Jul 2006 A1
20060179941 Okada Aug 2006 A1
20060180896 Martin Aug 2006 A1
20060185428 Combi Aug 2006 A1
20060231521 Chilcott Oct 2006 A1
20060266118 Denison et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070125161 Bryzek et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070180912 Judy et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070214886 Sheynblat Sep 2007 A1
20070273018 Onozuka et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070279885 Basavanhally et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070297631 Miles Dec 2007 A1
20080098814 Platt et al. May 2008 A1
20080283990 Nasir et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080289417 Okada Nov 2008 A1
20080290490 Fujii et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090114016 Nasiri et al. May 2009 A1
20090199637 Sugiura et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090255335 Fly et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090297770 Koshida et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100072626 Theuss et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100084752 Horning et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100132460 Seeger et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100164086 Noma Jul 2010 A1
20100176466 Fujii et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100182418 Jess et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100212425 Hsu et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100218977 Inoue et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100259130 Eckstein et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100324366 Shimotsu Dec 2010 A1
20110012248 Reichenbach et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110016972 Reinert Jan 2011 A1
20110030473 Acar Feb 2011 A1
20110219876 Kalnitsky Sep 2011 A1
20110227173 Seppala et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110228906 Jaffray et al. Sep 2011 A1
20120006789 DeNatale et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120032286 Trusov et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120042731 Lin et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120048017 Kempe Mar 2012 A1
20120091854 Kaajakari Apr 2012 A1
20120137774 Judy et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120142144 Taheri Jun 2012 A1
20120227487 Ayazi Sep 2012 A1
20120261822 Graham et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120272734 Jeung et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120280594 Chen et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120291547 Kim et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120300050 Korichi et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120326248 Daneman et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130009803 Edvardsson Jan 2013 A1
20130019678 Lazaroff et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130019680 Kittilsland Jan 2013 A1
20130100271 Howes Apr 2013 A1
20130105921 Najafi May 2013 A1
20130115729 Silverbrook et al. May 2013 A1
20130119492 Feiertag et al. May 2013 A1
20130126992 Ehrenpfordt May 2013 A1
20130146994 Kittilsland Jun 2013 A1
20130147020 Gonska et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130168740 Chen Jul 2013 A1
20130181355 Tsai Jul 2013 A1
20130192363 Loreck et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130192369 Acar et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130210175 Hoisington et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130221454 Dunbar, III et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130241546 Fu Sep 2013 A1
20130253335 Noto et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130270657 Acar Oct 2013 A1
20130277773 Bryzek Oct 2013 A1
20130285165 Classen et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130299924 Weber et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130315036 Paulson et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130341737 Bryzek et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140007685 Zhang et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140090469 Comi et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140090485 Feyh et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140091405 Weber Apr 2014 A1
20140092460 Schwedt et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140116135 Cazzaniga May 2014 A1
20140116136 Coronato May 2014 A1
20140124958 Bowles May 2014 A1
20140125325 Dcak et al. May 2014 A1
20140125359 El-Gamal et al. May 2014 A1
20140137648 Zolfagharkhani May 2014 A1
20140138853 Liu May 2014 A1
20140162393 Yang Jun 2014 A1
20140166463 Jahnes Jun 2014 A1
20140183729 Bowles Jul 2014 A1
20140186986 Shu Jul 2014 A1
20140193949 Wu Jul 2014 A1
20140203421 Shu Jul 2014 A1
20140210019 Nasiri Jul 2014 A1
20140227816 Zhang Aug 2014 A1
20140230548 Coronato Aug 2014 A1
20140231936 Jahnes Aug 2014 A1
20140231938 Campedelli Aug 2014 A1
20140260612 Aono et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140260617 Ocak Sep 2014 A1
20140264648 Chu et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140264650 Liu et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140283605 Baldasarre Sep 2014 A1
20140287548 Lin Sep 2014 A1
20140291128 Kwa Oct 2014 A1
20140311242 Lee Oct 2014 A1
20140311247 Zhang Oct 2014 A1
20140318906 Deimerly Oct 2014 A1
20140319630 Conti Oct 2014 A1
20140322854 Nakatani Oct 2014 A1
20140326070 Neul Nov 2014 A1
20140331769 Fell Nov 2014 A1
20140339654 Classen Nov 2014 A1
20140339656 Schlarmann Nov 2014 A1
20140349434 Huang Nov 2014 A1
20140352433 Hammer Dec 2014 A1
20140353775 Formosa Dec 2014 A1
20140357007 Cheng Dec 2014 A1
20140370638 Lee Dec 2014 A1
20140374850 Chen et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140374854 Xue Dec 2014 A1
20140374917 Weber Dec 2014 A1
20140374918 Weber Dec 2014 A1
20150008545 Quevy Jan 2015 A1
20150115376 Chen et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150191345 Boysel et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150198493 Kaelberer et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150329351 Cheng et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150330782 Johnson et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150371390 Gassner et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160003923 Zieren et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160060104 Chu et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160229684 Boysel Aug 2016 A1
20160229685 Boysel Aug 2016 A1
20160289063 Ocak et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160320426 Boysel et al. Nov 2016 A1
20170030788 Boysel et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170108336 Boysel et al. Apr 2017 A1
20180327255 Endean et al. Nov 2018 A1
20200346920 Endean et al. Nov 2020 A1
20210156756 Boysel et al. May 2021 A1
20210198096 Borca-Tasciuc et al. Jul 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (34)
Number Date Country
103350983 Oct 2013 CN
1802952 Jul 2007 EP
1819012 Aug 2007 EP
2410344 Jan 2012 EP
2544302 Jan 2013 EP
2693182 Feb 2014 EP
2693183 Feb 2014 EP
3019442 May 2016 EP
2008-114354 May 2008 JP
2008-132587 Jun 2008 JP
2009-245877 Oct 2009 JP
2011-194478 Oct 2011 JP
2012-247192 Dec 2012 JP
2013-030759 Feb 2013 JP
2013-164285 Aug 2013 JP
2008086530 Jul 2008 WO
2009009803 Jan 2009 WO
2009057990 May 2009 WO
2011151098 Dec 2011 WO
2012037539 Mar 2012 WO
2013116356 Aug 2013 WO
2014122910 Aug 2014 WO
2014159957 Oct 2014 WO
2014177542 Nov 2014 WO
2014184025 Nov 2014 WO
2015003264 Jan 2015 WO
2015013827 Feb 2015 WO
2015013828 Feb 2015 WO
2015038078 Mar 2015 WO
2015042700 Apr 2015 WO
2015042701 Apr 2015 WO
2015042702 Apr 2015 WO
2015103688 Jul 2015 WO
2015154173 Oct 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (38)
Entry
A Single-Proof-Mass MEMS Multi-Axis Motion Sensor by Dr. Mark Boysel, Semicon Japan 2008.
Virtus Sensor Technology by Dr. Mark Boysel, Semicon Japan, Nov. 11, 2008.
Development of a Single-Mass Five-Axis MEMS Motion Sensor, by R.M. Boysel, L.J. Ross, Virtus Advanced Sensors, Inc.., May 2009.
SOI micromachined 5-axis motion sensor using resonant electrostatic drive and non-resonant capacitive detection mode by Yoshiyuki Watanabe, Toshiaki Mitsui, Takashi Mineta, Yoshiyuki Matsu, Kazuhiro Okada, Available online Jan. 18, 2006.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/694,607, filed Nov. 25, 2019, Pending.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/024,722, filed Mar. 24, 2016, U.S. Pat. No. 10,273,147, Issued.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/283,002, filed Feb. 22, 2019, Pending.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/315,894, filed Dec. 2, 2016, 2017-0108336, Published.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/046,764, filed Jul. 26, 2018, 2019-0064364, Published.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/024,711, filed Mar. 24, 2016, U.S. Pat. No. 10,273,147, Issued.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/024,704, filed Mar. 24, 2016, 2016-0229684, Abandoned.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/206,935, filed Jul. 11, 2016, U.S. Pat. No. 10,214,414, Issued.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/283,002, filed Feb. 22, 2019, Abandoned.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/185,877, filed Feb. 25, 2021, Pending.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/302,731, filed Oct. 7, 2016, 2017-0030788, Abandoned.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/694,607, filed Nov. 25, 2019, U.S. Pat. No. 10,768,065, Issued.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/012,896, filed Sep. 4, 2020, 2021-0156756, Published.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/315,894, filed Dec. 2, 2016, 2017-0108336, Abandoned.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/046,764, filed Jul. 26, 2018, 2019-0064364, Abandoned.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/534,702, filed Jun. 9, 2017, 2017-0363694, Published.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/543,700, filed Jul. 14, 2017, U.S. Pat. No. 10,407,299, Issued.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/470,912, filed Sep. 9, 2021, Pending.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/558,807, filed Jul. 14, 2017, 2018-0074090, Abandoned.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/622,619, filed Feb. 13, 2015, U.S. Pat. No. 9,309,106, Issued.
European Search Report for Application No. 14822259.9 dated Jan. 4, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2014/050729, dated Nov. 3, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2014/050902, dated Dec. 15, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2014/050904, dated Dec. 1, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2014/050910, dated Dec. 22, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2014/051245, dated Feb. 25,2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2015/050018, dated Apr. 20, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2015/050026, dated Apr. 27, 2015.
Chan et al., A Monolithically Integrated Pressure/Oxygen/Temperature Sensing SoC for Multimodality Intracranial Neuromonitoring. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits. Nov. 2014;49(11):2449-61.
Merdassi et al., Capacitive MEMS absolute pressure sensor using a modified commercial microfabrication process. Microsystem Technol. Aug. 2017;23(8):3215-25. Published Online Jun. 20, 2016.
Merdassi et al., Design and Fabrication of 3-Axis Accelerometer Sensor Microsystem for Wide Temperature Range Applications Using Semi-Custom Process. Proc of SPIE. Mar. 2014;8973:89730O-1-89730O-12.
Merdassi et al., Design of 3-axis Capacitive Low-Gravity MEMS Accelerometer with Zero Cross-Axis Sensitivity in a Commercial Process. NSTI-Nanotech, www.nsti.org. Jan. 2013;2:185-188.
Merdassi et al., Wafer level vacuum encapsulated tri-axial accelerometer with low cross-axis sensitivity in a commercial MEMS Process. Sensors and Actuators A. Oct. 2015;236:25-37.
Merdassi, Ulta-Clean Wafer-Level Vacuum Encapsulated Intertial Using Commerical Process. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering McGill University, Montreal, Canada. A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the Requirements of the degree of Docto of Philosopy. 158 pages, Jul. 2016.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150260519 A1 Sep 2015 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
61861821 Aug 2013 US
61861786 Aug 2013 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent PCT/CA2014/050730 Aug 2014 US
Child 14622548 US