This invention relates to MicroElectroMechanical Systems (MEMS) motion sensors enabling electrical measurements from top and/or bottom caps. The invention also relates to a method for manufacturing MEMS motion sensors.
MEMS inertial sensors, which include accelerometers and angular rate sensors or gyroscopes, are used in a growing number of applications which have been increasing steadily over the past decade.
Presently, most MEMS gyroscopes use polysilicon as their mechanical material. However, due to the build-up of stresses in films deposited during the fabrication of these devices, processes for physical and chemical deposition are limited to only a few micrometers of material. Consequently polysilicon devices tend to have small masses. Small sensing masses provide low measurement sensitivity and higher vulnerability to thermal noise. Additionally, since springs and comb electrodes are patterned in the same material as the mass, the spring and electrode widths are limited to only a few microns, leading to small sense capacitances and weak springs. Furthermore, the dimensions of the capacitors, springs, and proof mass are all determined by the mechanical polysilicon film thickness. Some MEMS gyroscope manufacturers have tried to address sensitivity and noise issues by using a thicker MEMS layer made out of a single crystal silicon layer. However, as with the polysilicon devices, the spring width cannot be decoupled from the mass thickness. If the mass thickness is increased to increase sensitivity or decrease noise, the spring stiffness will increase, counteracting the effects of the mass increase.
MEMS gyroscopes are generally two-dimensional architectures using comb drives and detectors. The directions parallel to the plane of the device (typically denoted x and y) are similar (in mass distribution, symmetry, etc.), but the direction perpendicular to the plane (z) is different from the other two. Consequently, different angular rate transduction methods must be used for each, resulting in two classes of gyroscopes: 2 axis x/y gyroscopes and 1 axis z gyroscopes. Devices marketed as three axis gyroscopes typically consist of three gyroscopes integrated onto the same chip with as many as four to six proof masses.
Numerous subsequent improvements in MEMS inertial measurement unit (IMU) packaging have been made to simplify the package and reduce cost. Most of these approaches take advantage of the 2D planar nature of silicon microelectronics fabrication. Most MEMS devices are fabricated by successively depositing thin films, using a photolithographic process to form the desired 2D shape of the film, such as the MEMS inertial sensor proof mass, and etching the pattern into the film. In some cases the photolithographic process produces a form into which the film is plated or deposited to form the desired pattern. This process sequence is repeated over and over to form the final device. As a result, most MEMS devices are planar or two-dimensional since they consist of a stack of very thin films, each typically on the order of micrometer thick or less.
In all these cases a cap (e.g. silicon or glass) is placed over the MEMS to protect it and electrical contact is made to the top of the MEMS and/or CMOS. Most of these integration approaches are based on the 2D nature of the sensors with detection and signal transduction in the plane of the device. For example, almost all accelerometers and gyroscopes use comb capacitors for drive and detection in the plane of the device. Consequently the electrical leads have to be brought out on the MEMS wafer under the cap, so IMU packaging still requires wire bonding and packaging.
Efforts have been made to overcome the sensitivity limitations due to the small mass by using bulk silicon micromachining to fabricate a larger proof mass from the full thickness of the silicon wafer. Most of these efforts have been directed towards the development of accelerometers; little work has been done on large proof mass gyroscopes.
What is needed is a MEMS motion sensor which allows transmitting electrical signals from within the sensor to at least one cap, while enclosing the proof mass. It would also be desirable for the motion sensor to allow measurement of acceleration along three axes, and also the measurement of angular rate. Current pendulous accelerometer designs have not been successfully adapted to angular velocity measurements.
Additionally, what is needed is a wafer-scale fabrication method in which the proof mass is sealed in an enclosure which provides electrodes above and also below the proof mass, to drive and sense the motion.
A MEMS motion sensor is provided. The MEMS wafer has first and second opposed sides and includes an outer frame, a proof mass and flexible springs suspending the proof mass relative to the outer frame and enabling the proof mass to move relative to the outer frame along mutually orthogonal x, y and z axes. The sensor also includes top and bottom cap wafers respectively bonded to the first and second sides of the MEMS wafer. The top cap wafer, the bottom cap wafer and the outer frame of the MEMS wafer define a cavity for housing the proof mass. The MEMS wafer, the top cap wafer and the bottom cap wafer are electrically conductive, and are preferably made of silicon-based semiconductor. Top and bottom cap electrodes are respectively provided in the top and bottom cap wafers and form capacitors with the proof mass, the top and bottom cap electrodes are configurable to detect a motion of the proof mass. Electrical contacts are provided on the top cap wafer and form first and second sets of electrical contacts. The electrical contact of the first set are connected to the respective top cap electrodes, and the electrical contacts of the second set are connected to the respective bottom cap electrodes by way of respective insulated conducting pathways, each extending along the z axis from one of the respective bottom cap electrodes and upward successively through the bottom cap wafer, the outer frame of the MEMS wafer and the top cap wafer.
In some embodiments, the proof mass and flexible springs form a resonant structure having resonant frequencies fx, fy and fz for motion along the x, y and z axes, respectively.
In some embodiments, the MEMS motion sensor comprises electrode assemblies (or sets of electrodes), each including at least one pair of the top and/or bottom cap electrodes. Preferably, the motion sensor includes a first set of electrodes configurable to detect a rocking motion of the proof mass about the y axis, indicative of an acceleration of the proof mass along the x axis; a second set of electrodes configurable to detect a rocking motion of the proof mass about the x axis, indicative of an acceleration of the proof mass along the y axis; and a third set of electrodes configured to detect a translational motion of the proof mass along the z axis, indicative of an acceleration of the proof mass along the z axis.
In some embodiments, one set of electrode is configured to vibrate the proof mass at a drive frequency along the z axis, and two other sets of electrodes are configured to detect Coriolis-induced oscillations of the proof mass along the x and y axes, indicative of an angular motion of the proof mass about the y and x axes, respectively.
The drive frequency preferably corresponds to the resonant frequency fz. In some embodiments, the resonant frequency fz is substantially identical to each of the respective resonant frequencies fx, fy, in order to provide matched resonance conditions. Preferably, a relative difference between any two of the resonant frequencies fz, fx, fy is no more than 10%. It is also possible that the resonant structure be shaped, sized and configured with each of the resonant frequencies fx, fy and fz being substantially different, for example with mutually non-overlapping 3 dB-bandwidths, in order to provide non-matched resonance conditions.
In some embodiments, the drive frequency is lower than at least one of the respective resonant frequencies fx and fy, such as 10-40% lower.
In some embodiments, one set of electrodes is configured to vibrate the proof mass at a drive frequency along a corresponding one of the x and y axes, respectively, and another set of electrodes is configured to detect Coriolis-induced oscillations of the proof mass along the other one of the x and y axes, indicative of an angular motion of the proof mass about the z axis.
In some embodiments, the resonant structure is shaped, sized and configured such that each of the resonant frequencies fx, fy and fz is substantially higher than sensing frequencies at which the electrode assemblies are configured to detect the motion of the proof mass in response to accelerations of the proof mass along to the x, y and z axes, respectively.
In some embodiments, the top and bottom cap electrodes may comprise a pair of said top and bottom electrodes aligned with the z axis, which is centered relative to the proof mass. The top and bottom cap electrodes may also comprise two pairs of said top and bottom electrodes disposed along the x axis on each side of the y axis, and also possibly two pairs of said top and bottom electrodes disposed along the y axis on each side of the x axis.
In some embodiments, the proof mass can be shaped as a convex polygonal prism, which is preferably regular, such as an octagonal prism. Typically, the motion sensor includes four flexible springs.
The top and bottom electrodes typically extend through the entire thicknesses of the top and bottom cap wafers, respectively, and are preferably delimited by insulated channels. Preferably, the MEMS wafer is a silicon on insulator (SOI) wafer with an insulating layer separating a device layer from a handle layer, and the proof mass can be patterned in both the device and handle layers.
In some embodiments, the motion sensor comprise an additional insulated conducting pathway extending through the bottom cap wafer, through the frame of the MEMS wafer, and though the top cap wafer, between one of the electrical contacts of the top cap wafer to the electrical contact of the bottom cap wafer, thereby forming a conductive feedthrough.
A method for manufacturing the MEMS motion sensor is also provided. The method comprises the steps of:
The method can also include a step of forming electrical contacts on the outer side of the top cap wafer connected with the insulated conducting pathways, allowing routing of electrical signals from the electrodes of the bottom cap wafer to these electrical contacts. The method can also include a step of forming electrical contacts on the bottom cap wafer, connected to some of the insulated conducting pathways, allowing routing of electrical signals to the electrical contacts on the bottom cap wafer.
Of course, other processing steps may be performed prior, during or after the above described steps. The order of the steps may also differ, and some of the steps may be combined.
It should be noted that the appended drawings illustrate only exemplary embodiments of the invention and should therefore not be considered limiting of its scope, as the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
In the following description, similar features of the drawings have been given similar reference numerals. To preserve the clarity of the drawings, some reference numerals have been omitted when they were already identified in a preceding figure.
The present invention provides a MEMS motion sensor formed by a top cap wafer, a central MEMS wafer and a bottom cap wafer, the wafers being made of an electrically conducting material, such as silicon. Both the top and bottom cap wafers are provided with electrodes on both sides of a pendulous proof mass. The MEMS motion sensor also includes insulated conducting pathways, at least some of which extend from electrodes in the bottom cap wafer, through the MEMS wafer and to the top cap wafer, allowing routing or transmitting electrical signals sensed by the electrodes of the bottom cap through the MEMS wafer, and more specifically through the lateral frame of the sensor, from the bottom cap wafer to the top cap wafer. This architecture of the MEMS motion sensor enables the placement of electrodes and electrical leads above, below, and/or around a pendulous proof mass, for measuring acceleration and/or angular velocity. This architecture of the MEMS motion sensor thus not only allows encapsulating the proof mass, it also makes efficient use of the protective caps by including electrodes in the caps, and by providing insulated conducted pathways which allow routing signals from the bottom side of the sensor to the top side, allowing the placement of the electrical contacts on a single side of the sensor. Of course, if needed, electrical contacts can also be placed on the bottom side of the sensor. Yet another advantage of the present MEMS motion sensor resides in the patterning of a bulk, pendulous proof mass (having for example a thickness varying from 400 to 700 um), which is suspended by flexible springs patterned such that they are much thinner than the proof mass. Further details regarding devices and methods of operating motion sensors are described in international application number PCT/CA2014/050635 entitled “MEMS Device and Method of Manufacturing” filed on Jul. 4, 2014, and the corresponding U.S. Application No. filed on Feb. 13, 2015, the entire contents of these applications being incorporated herein by reference.
Referring to
The motion sensor 10 includes top and bottom cap electrodes 13, 15 respectively provided in the top and bottom cap wafers 12, 14, and forming capacitors with the proof mass 17. The electrodes are configured to detect a motion of the proof mass 17, such as a translation along the z axis, or a rocking along the x or y axis. Electrical contacts 42 are provided on the top cap wafer 12. The contacts 42 form first and second sets of electrical contacts: the electrical contact of the first set are connected to the top cap electrodes 13, and the electrical contacts of the second set are connected to the bottom cap electrodes 15 by way of respective insulated conducting pathways, such as pathway 33ii. The pathways connected to the bottom cap electrodes extend upward along the z axis, successively through the bottom cap wafer 14, the outer frame 164 of the MEMS wafer 16 and the top cap wafer 12. Of course, other electrical contacts can be provided on the top cap wafer, such as for connecting feedthroughs extending from the bottom to the top cap for example, and other insulated conducting pathways, such as pathway 33i, can be provided for connecting electrodes of the top cap wafer, and also possibly of the proof mass.
In the present description, the terms “top” and “bottom” relate to the position of the wafers as shown in the figures. Unless otherwise indicated, positional descriptions such as “top”, “bottom” and the like should be taken in the context of the figures and should not be considered as being limitative. The top cap wafer can also be referred as a first cap wafer, and the bottom cap wafer can be referred as a second cap wafer. The terms “top” and “bottom” are used to facilitate reading of the description, and persons skilled in the art of MEMS know that, when in use, MEMS devices can be placed in different orientations such that the “top cap wafer” and the “bottom cap wafer” are positioned upside down. In this particular embodiment, the “top” refers to the direction of the device layer.
In this specific embodiment, the proof mass 17 is suspended by four flexible springs (27i, 27ii, 27iii and 27iv—identified in
The proof mass 17 and flexible springs 27 form together a resonant structure having resonant frequencies fx, fy and fz for motion along the x, y and z axes, respectively. The resonant frequencies can be set by adjusting the width and thickness of the springs and/or the size and shape of the proof mass.
Referring to
In
As shown in
Finally, the motion sensor includes a pair of top and bottom electrodes 13v and 15v. Electrode 15v is similar to electrode 13v, but hidden underneath proof mass 17. The electrodes 13v and 15v are aligned with the z axis, which is centered relative to the proof mass.
Of course, the electrode assemblies can be grouped and/or positioned differently, and include more or less electrodes, as long as they are able to detect motion of the proof mass in all three directions x, y and z.
In addition to detecting accelerations of the proof mass, the MEMS motion sensor can also be configured to detect angular rate or angular velocity (deg/sec). Typically, MEMS gyroscopes use vibrating mechanical elements to sense angular rotation via the Coriolis Effect. The Coriolis Effect arises when a mass M is moving at velocity {right arrow over (ν)} in a reference frame rotating with angular rate {right arrow over (Ω)}. An observer sitting in the rotating frame perceives the mass to be deflected from its straight-line trajectory by the Coriolis Force, given by {right arrow over (F)}Coriolis=2M{right arrow over (ν)}×{right arrow over (Ω)}, where × denotes the vector cross-product.
In order to detect angular motion of the suspended proof mass, a periodic force is applied to the proof mass along one direction. When the sensor, and by extension the proof mass, is subjected to an angular rotation, a periodic Coriolis force proportional to the rate of rotation at the same frequency as the drive, but out of phase by 90 degrees, is induced along a direction perpendicular to both the drive signal and the axis of rotation. The magnitude of this motion can measured using capacitive sensing techniques.
The MEMS motion sensor can sense motion over 5 degrees of freedom (5 DOF), that is, accelerations along x, y and z axes, and angular velocity along the x and y axes. In this case, an electrode assembly is configured to vibrate the proof mass 17 at a drive frequency along the z axis, and two other electrode assemblies are configured to detect Coriolis-induced oscillations of the proof mass along the x and y axes, indicative of an angular motion of the proof mass with respect to the y and x axes, respectively.
The resonant structure formed by the proof mass 17 and flexible springs 27 can be sized, shaped and configured to provide either matched or unmatched resonance conditions, depending on the objective sought. Referring to
Referring now to
The ratios of the frequencies can be adjusted by modifying the ratios of the rocking moment of inertia to the total mass. The ratios of the rocking frequencies fx, fy to the vertical resonant frequency fz depend chiefly on the ratio of the rocking moment of inertia to the mass,
where Kz is the z spring constant, J is the moment of inertia along one of the rocking axes, M is the mass, and Krot is the rotational spring constant, which for a four spring architecture is roughly
with S being the width of the proof mass. So the frequency ratio reduces to
is the definition of the radius of gyration, the distance from the axis of rotation of an extended object at which its mass, if concentrated into a point mass, would have the same moment of inertia as the extended object, i.e. appear as a simple pendulum. In other words, =MrG2, so
Thus, to operate non-resonantly and ensure that the rocking frequency fr (fx, fy) is higher than the resonant frequency fz, the proof mass can be designed such that
For proof masses with large lobes, J is large (i.e. large radius of gyration), so the rocking frequency fx or fy is lower than the z frequency fz. Low moment of inertia is obtained when most of the mass is concentrated beneath the axis. This occurs more naturally for proof masses with simple or “regular” cross sections. Similarly, to have the y rocking frequency fy higher than the x rocking frequency fx, the y axis moment of inertial must be smaller than the x axis moment. This can be accomplished by reducing the proof mass width along the y axis relative to the x axis.
In another embodiment, it is possible to measure angular motion about the z axis as well. In this case the MEMS motion sensor detects motion over 6 degrees of freedom (6 DOF). The x and y angular velocities are measured separately from the z angular velocity. Existing surface micromachined MEMS gyroscopes having small proof masses and sense electrodes require the gyroscope to be operated in a resonant sense mode. Advantageously, the MEMS motion sensor of the present invention can be operated in either a resonant or a non-resonant mode, due to the relatively large proof mass and sense electrodes. For higher sensitivity, the MEMS motion sensor is preferably designed with matched resonant frequencies fx, fy and fz. Alternatively, to reduce the impact temperature, fabrication, and phase sensitivities which are exacerbated by working near the peak of the sense frequency response curve, the MEMS motion sensor can be designed with non-matched resonant frequencies.
The angular velocity around the 6th or z axis is measured in a different way since the drive axis must be along an orthogonal axis. In this case, one of the first and second electrode assemblies is configured to vibrate the proof mass at a drive frequency along a corresponding one of the x and y axes, respectively, the first electrode assembly being configured to detect Coriolis-induced oscillations of the proof mass along the other one of the x and y axes, indicative of an angular motion of the proof mass about the z axis. Preferably, the drive frequency along the corresponding one of the x and y axes corresponds to a respective one of the resonant frequencies fx and fy.
The proof mass is driven along one of the lateral axes, e.g. the x-axis, at the rocking frequency, such as shown in
For a symmetric proof mass, the x and y rocking modes occur at the same frequency, so a matched-mode angular rate measurement is more natural, such as shown in
It will be appreciated that in either one of the matched or unmatched resonant modes, the resonant structure is shaped, sized and configured such that each of the resonant frequencies fx, fy and fz is substantially higher than sensing frequencies at which the electrode assemblies are configured to detect the motion of the proof mass in response to accelerations of the proof mass along to the x, y and z axes, respectively.
Depending of the application of the MEMS motion sensor (3 DOF accelerometer and/or 5 DOF or 6 DOF gyroscope) some of the top and/or bottom electrodes are connectable to driving means, and other ones of the top and/or bottom electrodes are connectable to sensing means. The top and bottom electrodes can also be reconfigurably connectable to driving and sensing means, for switching between drive and sense modes. The terms “driving means” and “sensing means” refer to any electronic circuitry configured to transmit and/or read electric signals.
The proof mass can take different shapes, such as a cross-shape as shown in
As shown in any one of
Referring now to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Manufacturing Method
The motion sensor is a multi-wafer stack consisting of top and bottom cap wafers containing sense electrodes and the center MEMS wafer containing the proof mass and springs. As described previously, the stack is combined with insulated conducting pathways, which can also be referred to as electrically isolated “3 dimensional through-chip vias” (3DTCVs) to route signals from electrodes on the bottom cap and MEMS wafer through the MEMS wafer to and through the top cap wafer to bond pads on the surface, thus providing a means of monitoring the position of the proof mass in three-dimensional space.
The method for manufacturing the MEMS device will be described in connection with a preferred embodiment. However, it will be understood that there is no intent to limit the invention to the embodiment described.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In this example, the MEMS wafer channel 163 will eventually form part of a device feedthrough, located in the periphery of the handle layer 22. Trenches 28 are etched around the conductive silicon wafer plug 26 to isolate it from the rest of the layer 22. The SOI conducting shunt 34 in the device and insulating layers 20, 24 provides electrical conductivity within the channel 163. If there were no shunt 34, the silicon plug would merely be a mechanical support.
Referring to
Similar to the bonding of the other cap wafer, the bond is a conductive bond, which can be performed using various bonding method such as fusion bonding or bonding with a conducting material, such as gold thermocompression bonding or gold-silicon eutectic bonding for example. The bond is used to provide electrical contact between the channels in the MEMS wafer and the channels in the cap wafer 14, some of which are connected electrically to the bottom electrodes 15. In this manner, a conductive pathway 33i is provided from a bottom electrode 15 through the bottom cap silicon pad, handle feedthrough, SOI conducting shunt, and SOI device layer pad to the top cap wafer pad. At this point the MEMS wafer 16 is hermetically sealed between the cap wafers 12, 14. The proof mass is aligned with electrodes of the top cap and/or bottom cap and/or any handle side electrodes. Because the insulating channels do not yet fully penetrate the caps, the electrodes (such those illustrated—13i, 13ii, 13v and 15i 15ii and 15v) on each cap are shorted together through the remaining silicon.
Referring to
However, manufacturing the MEMS motion sensor 10 typically comprises the step of forming electrical contacts on at least the outer side 122 of the top cap wafer 12. The electrical contacts on the top cap are connected with the insulated conducting pathway 33i and feedthrough 25, and allow to route electrical signals from the bottom cap wafer 14 to the electrical contacts on the top cap wafer 12. Preferably, the method further comprises forming electrical contacts on the outer side 142 of the bottom cap wafer 14 as well. These electrical contacts 43, being connected to some of the insulated conducting pathway 33i, allow the routing of electrical signals from the conducting pathway 33i to the electrical contacts on the bottom cap wafer 14.
This step of forming electrical contacts on the outer sides of the top and/or bottom cap wafers can be accomplished as follows. The procedure is illustrated for one side of the MEMS device only, but of course the same steps can be performed on the other side as well.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
A possible embodiment of a completed IMU is shown in 25C. At this point in the process the MEMS IMU wafer is still in wafer form. For wafer scale system packaging, the I/O bond pads of the MEMS IMU and feedthroughs are designed to match the I/O pads of the sense electronics IC. The sense electronics IC wafer 44 can then be flip chip bonded directly to the top of the MEMS IMU wafer using an underfill and solder-bump wafer bonding process. These wafer bonding processes are known in the semiconductor industry and any can be used by implementing the appropriate bond pad and solder metallurgies. The bonded wafers can be diced into chips, or “MEMS IMU cubes”. The diced and hermetically sealed IMU cubes can be treated as packaged chips ready to be solder-attached to other chips, multi-chip package, or PC (printed circuit) board.
The benefits of this approach are:
The figures illustrate only an exemplary embodiment of the invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, as the invention may admit to other equally effective or equivalent embodiments. The scope of the claims should not be limited by the preferred embodiments set forth in the examples, but should be given the broadest interpretation consistent with the description as a whole.
This patent application is a continuation-in-part of international application no. PCT/CA2014/050730 filed on Aug. 1, 2014, which claims priority from U.S. application No. 61/861,786 filed on Aug. 2, 2013 and from U.S. application No. 61/861,821 filed on Aug. 2, 2013. The disclosures of each of these applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4430895 | Colton | Feb 1984 | A |
4483194 | Rudolf | Nov 1984 | A |
4553436 | Hansson | Nov 1985 | A |
4590801 | Merhav | May 1986 | A |
4592233 | Peters | Jun 1986 | A |
4805456 | Howe | Feb 1989 | A |
4833417 | Schroeder | May 1989 | A |
4881408 | Hulsing | Nov 1989 | A |
4882933 | Petersen | Nov 1989 | A |
4905523 | Okada | Mar 1990 | A |
4967605 | Okada | Nov 1990 | A |
5177661 | Zavracky et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5235457 | Lichtman et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5239984 | Cane et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5359893 | Dunn | Nov 1994 | A |
5557046 | Hulsing | Sep 1996 | A |
5596144 | Swanson | Jan 1997 | A |
5608210 | Esparza et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5614742 | Gessner | Mar 1997 | A |
5623270 | Kempkes et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5635639 | Greiff et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5646346 | Okada | Jul 1997 | A |
5662111 | Cosman | Sep 1997 | A |
5777226 | Ip | Jul 1998 | A |
5831163 | Okada | Nov 1998 | A |
5894090 | Tang | Apr 1999 | A |
5895850 | Buestgens | Apr 1999 | A |
5898223 | Frye | Apr 1999 | A |
5920011 | Hulsing | Jul 1999 | A |
5959206 | Ryrko | Sep 1999 | A |
5962784 | Hulsing | Oct 1999 | A |
5977640 | Bertin | Nov 1999 | A |
5987985 | Okada | Nov 1999 | A |
5992233 | Clark | Nov 1999 | A |
6003371 | Okada | Dec 1999 | A |
6028773 | Hundt | Feb 2000 | A |
6053057 | Okada | Apr 2000 | A |
6058778 | Chan | May 2000 | A |
6079272 | Stell | Jun 2000 | A |
6090638 | Vigna | Jul 2000 | A |
6091132 | Bryant | Jul 2000 | A |
6119517 | Breng | Sep 2000 | A |
6122961 | Geen | Sep 2000 | A |
6159773 | Lin | Dec 2000 | A |
6184052 | Vigna | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6225699 | Ference | May 2001 | B1 |
6235550 | Chan | May 2001 | B1 |
6257057 | Hulsing | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6282956 | Okada | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295870 | Hulsing | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6391673 | Ha | May 2002 | B1 |
6399997 | Lin | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6469330 | Vigna | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487000 | Mastromatteo | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6490923 | Breng | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508124 | Zerbini | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6539801 | Gutierrez | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6584845 | Gutierrez | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6587312 | Murari | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6621137 | Ma | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6651500 | Stewart | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6675630 | Challoner | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6696364 | Gelmi | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6701786 | Hulsing | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6705167 | Kvisteroey | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6715353 | Johnson | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6718823 | Platt | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6766689 | Durante | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6772632 | Okada | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6808952 | Sniegowski et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6808955 | Ma | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6829937 | Mahon | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6841861 | Brady | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6856144 | Lasalandra | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6863832 | Wiemer | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6865943 | Okada | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6892575 | Nasiri | May 2005 | B2 |
6925875 | Silverbrook | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939473 | Nasiri | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6942750 | Chou | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6944931 | Shcheglov | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6953985 | Lin | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6978673 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6990863 | Challoner | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6991957 | Eskridge | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993617 | Butcher | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7017410 | Challoner | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7040163 | Shcheglov | May 2006 | B2 |
7043985 | Ayazi | May 2006 | B2 |
7056757 | Ayazi | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7093486 | Challoner | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100448 | Ikegami | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7104129 | Nasiri | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7138694 | Nunan | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7159441 | Challoner | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7160752 | Ouellet et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7168317 | Chen et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7168318 | Challoner | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7176556 | Okamoto | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7180019 | Chiou | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7210351 | Lo | May 2007 | B2 |
7217588 | Hartzell | May 2007 | B2 |
7238999 | LaFond | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7247246 | Nasiri | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250112 | Nasiri | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250353 | Nasiri | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7258008 | Durante | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7258011 | Nasiri | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7258012 | Xie | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7275424 | Felton | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7291561 | Ma | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7318349 | Vaganov | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7322236 | Combi | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7322237 | Kutsuna | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7337671 | Ayazi | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7347095 | Shcheglov | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7360423 | Ayazi | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7402905 | Eskridge et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7417329 | Chuang | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7442570 | Chuang | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7458263 | Nasiri | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7484410 | Tsuji | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7491567 | DCamp | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7518493 | Bryzek et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7541588 | Tabirian et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7543496 | Ayazi | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7578189 | Mehregany | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7615406 | Higashi | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7617729 | Axelrod et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7621183 | Seeger | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624494 | Challoner | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7642115 | Eriksen et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7642657 | Suilleabhain | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7677099 | Nasiri | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7684101 | Border et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7689321 | Karlsson | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7690254 | Pilchowski et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7694563 | Durante | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7748272 | Kranz | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7755367 | Schoen | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7767483 | Waters | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7767484 | Ayazi | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7784344 | Pavelescu | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7786572 | Chen | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7790608 | Lauxtermann et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7795723 | Chau et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7810379 | DeNatale et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7851898 | Nakamura | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7863698 | Seeger | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7875942 | Cortese | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7882740 | Okada | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7886601 | Merassi | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7898043 | Ziglioli | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7908921 | Binda | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7928632 | Yang | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7929143 | Wilfinger et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7934423 | Nasiri | May 2011 | B2 |
7964428 | Breng | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7971483 | Supino et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7982291 | Kuisma | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7982558 | Sworowski | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7987714 | DeNatale et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8042394 | Coronato | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8047075 | Nasiri | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8049515 | Schoen | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8069726 | Seeger | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8071398 | Yang | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8077372 | Border et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8080869 | Okudo | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8084332 | Nasiri | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8100012 | Martin | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8124895 | Merassi | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8134214 | Baldo | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8151640 | Kubena | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8166816 | Ayazi et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8176782 | Furukubo | May 2012 | B2 |
8220328 | Rudolf et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8227285 | Yang | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8227911 | Yang | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8230740 | Katsuki et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8236577 | Hsu | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8258590 | Geiger | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8272266 | Zhang | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8283737 | Sugizaki | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8289092 | Pomarico | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8297121 | Quer et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8314483 | Lin | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8324047 | Yang | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8347717 | Seeger | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8350346 | Huang | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8365595 | Geiger | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8368153 | Huang et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8372677 | Mehregany | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8375789 | Prandi | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8384134 | Daneman | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8390173 | Yoshihara et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8395252 | Yang | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8395381 | Lo | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8402666 | Hsu | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8405170 | Kohl | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8407905 | Hsu | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8413506 | Coronato | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8421082 | Yang | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8426961 | Shih | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8432005 | Yang | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8433084 | Conti | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8445307 | Yeh et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8459093 | Donadel | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8459110 | Cazzaniga | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8461935 | McCraith | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8481365 | Verhelijden | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8486744 | Lin et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8487444 | Law | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8490461 | Sasaki | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8490483 | Wrede | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8497557 | Tanaka | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8508039 | Nasiri | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8508045 | Khan | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8513747 | Huang et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8519537 | Jeng | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8567246 | Shaeffer | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8569090 | Taheri | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8587077 | Chen | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8593036 | Boysel | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8614110 | Waters et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8637943 | Yang | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8652961 | Yang | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8675181 | Hall | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8685776 | LaFond | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8704238 | Yang | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8748206 | Horning | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8759926 | Fujii et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8810030 | Geisberger | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8826514 | Papavasiliou et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8869616 | Sridharamurthy | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8885170 | Kilic | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8919199 | Judy et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8921145 | Shu | Dec 2014 | B2 |
RE45439 | Prandi et al. | Mar 2015 | E |
9013233 | Elmallah et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9046541 | Kubena et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9061891 | Supino et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9063549 | Pennecot et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9085455 | Cheng et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9309106 | Boysel et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9340414 | Yoneoka et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9409768 | DeNatale et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9567204 | Hung et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9594128 | Farghaly et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9709595 | Vohra et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9751754 | Kurashima et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9784835 | Droz et al. | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9837935 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9945950 | Newman et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9981841 | Chu et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10365131 | Grossman et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10392244 | Hung et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10598689 | Zwahlen et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10768065 | Boysel | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10793421 | Rajasekaran et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
11060866 | Blomqvist et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11287486 | Boysel | Mar 2022 | B2 |
20010011994 | Morimoto | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020040602 | Okada | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030094046 | Okada | May 2003 | A1 |
20030209075 | Okada | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040052016 | Takagi | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040063239 | Yun et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040211258 | Geen | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040224279 | Siemons | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040231422 | Okada | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050076719 | Jakobsen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050166677 | Nasir et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050210981 | Okada | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050242991 | Montgomery et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060163453 | Hynes | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060179941 | Okada | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060180896 | Martin | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060185428 | Combi | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060231521 | Chilcott | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060266118 | Denison et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070125161 | Bryzek et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070180912 | Judy et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070214886 | Sheynblat | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070273018 | Onozuka et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070279885 | Basavanhally et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070297631 | Miles | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080098814 | Platt et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080283990 | Nasir et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080289417 | Okada | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080290490 | Fujii et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090114016 | Nasiri et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090199637 | Sugiura et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090255335 | Fly et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090297770 | Koshida et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100072626 | Theuss et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100084752 | Horning et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100132460 | Seeger et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100164086 | Noma | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100176466 | Fujii et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100182418 | Jess et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100212425 | Hsu et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100218977 | Inoue et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100259130 | Eckstein et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100324366 | Shimotsu | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110012248 | Reichenbach et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110016972 | Reinert | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110030473 | Acar | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110219876 | Kalnitsky | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110227173 | Seppala et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110228906 | Jaffray et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120006789 | DeNatale et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120032286 | Trusov et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120042731 | Lin et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120048017 | Kempe | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120091854 | Kaajakari | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120137774 | Judy et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120142144 | Taheri | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120227487 | Ayazi | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120261822 | Graham et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120272734 | Jeung et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120280594 | Chen et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120291547 | Kim et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120300050 | Korichi et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120326248 | Daneman et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130009803 | Edvardsson | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130019678 | Lazaroff et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130019680 | Kittilsland | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130100271 | Howes | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130105921 | Najafi | May 2013 | A1 |
20130115729 | Silverbrook et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130119492 | Feiertag et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130126992 | Ehrenpfordt | May 2013 | A1 |
20130146994 | Kittilsland | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130147020 | Gonska et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130168740 | Chen | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130181355 | Tsai | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130192363 | Loreck et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130192369 | Acar et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130210175 | Hoisington et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130221454 | Dunbar, III et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130241546 | Fu | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130253335 | Noto et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130270657 | Acar | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130277773 | Bryzek | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130285165 | Classen et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130299924 | Weber et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130315036 | Paulson et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130341737 | Bryzek et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140007685 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140090469 | Comi et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140090485 | Feyh et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140091405 | Weber | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140092460 | Schwedt et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140116135 | Cazzaniga | May 2014 | A1 |
20140116136 | Coronato | May 2014 | A1 |
20140124958 | Bowles | May 2014 | A1 |
20140125325 | Dcak et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140125359 | El-Gamal et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140137648 | Zolfagharkhani | May 2014 | A1 |
20140138853 | Liu | May 2014 | A1 |
20140162393 | Yang | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140166463 | Jahnes | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140183729 | Bowles | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140186986 | Shu | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140193949 | Wu | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140203421 | Shu | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140210019 | Nasiri | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140227816 | Zhang | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140230548 | Coronato | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140231936 | Jahnes | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140231938 | Campedelli | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140260612 | Aono et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140260617 | Ocak | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140264648 | Chu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140264650 | Liu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140283605 | Baldasarre | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140287548 | Lin | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140291128 | Kwa | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140311242 | Lee | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140311247 | Zhang | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140318906 | Deimerly | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140319630 | Conti | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140322854 | Nakatani | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140326070 | Neul | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140331769 | Fell | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140339654 | Classen | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140339656 | Schlarmann | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140349434 | Huang | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140352433 | Hammer | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140353775 | Formosa | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140357007 | Cheng | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140370638 | Lee | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140374850 | Chen et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140374854 | Xue | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140374917 | Weber | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140374918 | Weber | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150008545 | Quevy | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150115376 | Chen et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150191345 | Boysel et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150198493 | Kaelberer et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150329351 | Cheng et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150330782 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150371390 | Gassner et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160003923 | Zieren et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160060104 | Chu et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160229684 | Boysel | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160229685 | Boysel | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160289063 | Ocak et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160320426 | Boysel et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170030788 | Boysel et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170108336 | Boysel et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20180327255 | Endean et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20200346920 | Endean et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20210156756 | Boysel et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210198096 | Borca-Tasciuc et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103350983 | Oct 2013 | CN |
1802952 | Jul 2007 | EP |
1819012 | Aug 2007 | EP |
2410344 | Jan 2012 | EP |
2544302 | Jan 2013 | EP |
2693182 | Feb 2014 | EP |
2693183 | Feb 2014 | EP |
3019442 | May 2016 | EP |
2008-114354 | May 2008 | JP |
2008-132587 | Jun 2008 | JP |
2009-245877 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2011-194478 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2012-247192 | Dec 2012 | JP |
2013-030759 | Feb 2013 | JP |
2013-164285 | Aug 2013 | JP |
2008086530 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2009009803 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009057990 | May 2009 | WO |
2011151098 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2012037539 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2013116356 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2014122910 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2014159957 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014177542 | Nov 2014 | WO |
2014184025 | Nov 2014 | WO |
2015003264 | Jan 2015 | WO |
2015013827 | Feb 2015 | WO |
2015013828 | Feb 2015 | WO |
2015038078 | Mar 2015 | WO |
2015042700 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2015042701 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2015042702 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2015103688 | Jul 2015 | WO |
2015154173 | Oct 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
A Single-Proof-Mass MEMS Multi-Axis Motion Sensor by Dr. Mark Boysel, Semicon Japan 2008. |
Virtus Sensor Technology by Dr. Mark Boysel, Semicon Japan, Nov. 11, 2008. |
Development of a Single-Mass Five-Axis MEMS Motion Sensor, by R.M. Boysel, L.J. Ross, Virtus Advanced Sensors, Inc.., May 2009. |
SOI micromachined 5-axis motion sensor using resonant electrostatic drive and non-resonant capacitive detection mode by Yoshiyuki Watanabe, Toshiaki Mitsui, Takashi Mineta, Yoshiyuki Matsu, Kazuhiro Okada, Available online Jan. 18, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/694,607, filed Nov. 25, 2019, Pending. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/024,722, filed Mar. 24, 2016, U.S. Pat. No. 10,273,147, Issued. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/283,002, filed Feb. 22, 2019, Pending. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/315,894, filed Dec. 2, 2016, 2017-0108336, Published. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/046,764, filed Jul. 26, 2018, 2019-0064364, Published. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/024,711, filed Mar. 24, 2016, U.S. Pat. No. 10,273,147, Issued. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/024,704, filed Mar. 24, 2016, 2016-0229684, Abandoned. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/206,935, filed Jul. 11, 2016, U.S. Pat. No. 10,214,414, Issued. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/283,002, filed Feb. 22, 2019, Abandoned. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/185,877, filed Feb. 25, 2021, Pending. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/302,731, filed Oct. 7, 2016, 2017-0030788, Abandoned. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/694,607, filed Nov. 25, 2019, U.S. Pat. No. 10,768,065, Issued. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/012,896, filed Sep. 4, 2020, 2021-0156756, Published. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/315,894, filed Dec. 2, 2016, 2017-0108336, Abandoned. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/046,764, filed Jul. 26, 2018, 2019-0064364, Abandoned. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/534,702, filed Jun. 9, 2017, 2017-0363694, Published. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/543,700, filed Jul. 14, 2017, U.S. Pat. No. 10,407,299, Issued. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/470,912, filed Sep. 9, 2021, Pending. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/558,807, filed Jul. 14, 2017, 2018-0074090, Abandoned. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/622,619, filed Feb. 13, 2015, U.S. Pat. No. 9,309,106, Issued. |
European Search Report for Application No. 14822259.9 dated Jan. 4, 2017. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2014/050729, dated Nov. 3, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2014/050902, dated Dec. 15, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2014/050904, dated Dec. 1, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2014/050910, dated Dec. 22, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2014/051245, dated Feb. 25,2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2015/050018, dated Apr. 20, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2015/050026, dated Apr. 27, 2015. |
Chan et al., A Monolithically Integrated Pressure/Oxygen/Temperature Sensing SoC for Multimodality Intracranial Neuromonitoring. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits. Nov. 2014;49(11):2449-61. |
Merdassi et al., Capacitive MEMS absolute pressure sensor using a modified commercial microfabrication process. Microsystem Technol. Aug. 2017;23(8):3215-25. Published Online Jun. 20, 2016. |
Merdassi et al., Design and Fabrication of 3-Axis Accelerometer Sensor Microsystem for Wide Temperature Range Applications Using Semi-Custom Process. Proc of SPIE. Mar. 2014;8973:89730O-1-89730O-12. |
Merdassi et al., Design of 3-axis Capacitive Low-Gravity MEMS Accelerometer with Zero Cross-Axis Sensitivity in a Commercial Process. NSTI-Nanotech, www.nsti.org. Jan. 2013;2:185-188. |
Merdassi et al., Wafer level vacuum encapsulated tri-axial accelerometer with low cross-axis sensitivity in a commercial MEMS Process. Sensors and Actuators A. Oct. 2015;236:25-37. |
Merdassi, Ulta-Clean Wafer-Level Vacuum Encapsulated Intertial Using Commerical Process. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering McGill University, Montreal, Canada. A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the Requirements of the degree of Docto of Philosopy. 158 pages, Jul. 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150260519 A1 | Sep 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61861821 | Aug 2013 | US | |
61861786 | Aug 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/CA2014/050730 | Aug 2014 | US |
Child | 14622548 | US |