New generation wireless networks are increasingly becoming a necessity to accommodate user demands. Mobile data traffic continues to grow every year, challenging the wireless networks to provide greater speed, connect more devices, have lower latency, and transmit more and more data at once. Users now expect instant wireless connectivity regardless of the environment and circumstances, whether it is in an office building, a public space, an open preserve, or a vehicle. In response to these demands, new wireless standards have been designed for deployment in the near future. A large development in wireless technology is the fifth generation of cellular communications (“5G”) which encompasses more than the current Long-Term Evolution (“LTE”) capabilities of the Fourth Generation (“4G”) and promises to deliver high-speed Internet via mobile, fixed wireless and so forth. The 5G standards extend operations to millimeter wave bands, which cover frequencies beyond 6 GHz, and to planned 24 GHz, 26 GHz, 28 GHz, and 39 GHz up to 300 GHz, all over the world, and enable the wide bandwidths needed for high speed data communications.
The millimeter wave (“mm-wave”) spectrum provides narrow wavelengths in the range of ˜1 to 10 millimeters that are susceptible to high atmospheric attenuation and have to operate at short ranges (just over a kilometer). In dense-scattering areas with street canyons and in shopping malls for example, blind spots may exist due to multipath, shadowing and geographical obstructions. In remote areas where the ranges are larger and sometimes extreme climatic conditions with heavy precipitation occur, environmental conditions may prevent operators from using large array antennas due to strong winds and storms. These and other challenges in providing millimeter wave wireless communications for 5G networks impose ambitious goals on system design, including the ability to generate desired beam forms at controlled directions while avoiding interference among the many signals and structures of the surrounding environment.
The present application may be more fully appreciated in connection with the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which are not drawn to scale and in which like reference characters refer to like parts throughout, and wherein
Meta-Structure based reflectarrays for enhanced wireless applications are disclosed. The reflectarrays are suitable for many different wireless applications and can be deployed in a variety of environments and configurations. In various examples, the reflectarrays are arrays of cells having meta-structure reflector elements that reflect incident radio frequency (“RF”) signals in specific directions. A meta-structure, as generally defined herein, is an engineered, non- or semi-periodic structure that is spatially distributed to meet a specific phase and frequency distribution. A meta-structure reflector element is designed to be very small relative to the wavelength of the reflected RF signals. The reflectarrays are able to operate at the higher frequencies required for 5G and other wireless applications, and at relatively short distances. Their design and configuration are driven by geometrical and link budget considerations for a given application or deployment, whether indoors or outdoors.
It is appreciated that, in the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the examples. However, it is appreciated that the examples may be practiced without limitation to these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods and structures may not be described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the description of the examples. Also, the examples may be used in combination with each other.
Wireless coverage can be significantly improved to users outside of the LOS zone by the installation of a MTS based reflectarray 106 on a surface of building 102 (e.g., wall, window, etc.) Reflectarray 106 is a robust and low cost relay that is positioned as illustrated between BS 100 and user equipment (“UE”) (e.g., a UE in building 104) to significantly improve network coverage. As illustrated, reflectarray 106 is formed, placed, configured, embedded, or otherwise connected to a portion of building 102. Although a single reflectarray 106 is shown for illustration purposes, multiple such reflectarrays may be placed in external and/or internal surfaces of building 102 as desired.
In various examples, reflectarray 106 is able to act as a relay between BS 100 and users within or outside of its LOS zone. Users in a Non-Line-of-Sight (“NLOS”) zone are able to receive wireless signals from the BS 100 that are reflected off the reflectarray 106. Various configurations, shapes, and dimensions may be used to implement specific designs and meet specific constraints. The reflectarray 106 can be designed to directly reflect the wireless signals from BS 100 in specific directions from any desired location in the illustrated environment, be it in a suburban quiet area or a high traffic, high density city block. Use of a reflectarray such as reflectarray 106 and designed as disclosed herein can result in a significant performance improvement of even 10 times current 5G data rates.
Note that MTS reflectarrays can be placed in both outdoor and indoor environments.
In one example application shown in
Attention is now directed to
In various examples, the cells in the reflectarray 600 are MTS cells with MTS reflector elements. In other examples, the reflectarray cells may be composed of microstrips, gaps, patches, and so forth. Various configurations, shapes, and dimensions may be used to implement specific designs and meet specific constraints. As illustrated, reflectarray 600 may be a rectangular reflectarray with a length l and a width w. Other shapes (e.g., trapezoid, hexagon, etc.) may also be designed to satisfy design criteria for a given 5G application, such as the location of the reflectarray relative to a wireless radio, the desired gain and directivity performance, and so on. In some implementations, each cell in the array of cells of the reflectarray 600 includes a reflector element with a predetermined custom configuration, in which the predetermined custom configuration corresponds to a rectangular shape, a square shape, a trapezoid shape, a hexagon shape, or a cross shape. In this respect, the reflector elements may have different configurations, such as a square reflector element, a rectangular reflector element, a dipole reflector element, a miniaturized reflector element, and so on. In some implementations, at least two cells in the array of cells have reflector elements with different layout configurations. For example, a first cell may have a rectangular shape and a second cell may have a square shape.
In some implementations, the reflector element has dimensions different from that of the cell. For example, cell 602 is a rectangular cell of dimensions wc and lc for its width and length, respectively. Within cell 602 is a MTS reflector element 604 of dimensions wre and lre. As a MTS reflector element, its dimensions are in the sub-wavelength range (˜λ/3), with A indicating the wavelength of its incident or reflected RF signals. In some implementations, at least two cells in the array of cells comprise different types of reflector elements. For example, cell 606 includes a dipole element 608 and cell 610 includes a miniaturized reflector element 612 that has the smallest dimensions than that of other types of reflector elements in the cells in the reflectarray 600. The miniaturized reflector element 612 may effectively be a significantly small dot in an etched or patterned printed circuit board (“PCB”) metal layer that may be imperceptible to the human eye. As described in more detail below, the design of the reflectarray 600 is driven by geometrical and link budget considerations for a given application or deployment, whether indoors or outdoors. The dimensions, shape and cell configuration of the reflectarray 600 will therefore depend on the particular application. Each cell in the reflectarray 600 may have a different reflector element, as illustrated with the reflectarray 700 shown in
In various examples, a removable cover may be placed on top of the reflectarray as desired by the application. As shown in
Note that there may be various applications that may require the reflectarray to change its position without having to place another reflectarray in the environment.
Other configurations of rotating reflectarrays may be implemented as desired.
An even more flexible reflectarray in terms of its configuration and placement capabilities is illustrated in
Another configuration for a reflectarray is shown in
Attention is now directed to
The reflectarray 1700 can be used to reflect RF waves from WR 1702 into UE within the 5G network served by WR 1702, such as, for example, UE 1704 located at a distance D1 from the reflectarray 1700 with θ1 elevation and φ1 azimuth angles.
Returning to
Once the custom type, shape and dimensions of the reflectarray are determined according to the link budget, the next two steps can be performed sequentially or in parallel: the phase distribution on the reflectarray aperture is determined according to the link budget (1606) and the reflectarray cells are designed, i.e., their shape, size, and material are selected (1608). The reflection phase, (pr, for an ith cell in the reflectarray (e.g., cell 1804 in reflectarray 1800) is calculated as follows:
φr=k0(di−(xi cos φ0+yi sin φ0))sin θ0)±2Nπ (Eq. 1)
wherein k0 is the free space propagation constant, di is the distance from the BS to the ith cell in the reflectarray, N is an integer for phase wrapping, and φ0 and θ0 are the azimuth and elevation angles for the target reflection point. The calculation identifies a desired or required reflection phase φr by the ith element on the x-y plane to point a focused beam to (φ0, θ0). di, is the distance from the phase center of the BS to the center of the ith cell, and N is an integer. This formula and equation may further include weights to adapt and adjust specific cells or sets of cells. In some examples, a reflectarray may include multiple subarrays allowing redirection of a received signal in more than one direction, frequency, and so forth.
The last step in the design process is to then design the reflector elements in each cell (e.g., custom type, shape and dimensions in a sub-wavelength range) to achieve the phase distribution on the reflectarray aperture (1610). For example, the reflector elements in each cell include a reflection phase that corresponds to the phase distribution. The design process steps 1604-1610 may be iterated as needed to adjust parameters such as by weighting some of the cells, adding a tapering formulation, and so forth.
Once the reflectarray is designed, it is ready for placement and operation to significantly boost the wireless coverage and performance of any 5G or wireless application, whether indoors or outdoors. Note that even after the design is completed and the reflectarray is manufactured and placed in an environment to enable high performance 5G applications, the reflectarray can still be adjusted with the use of say rotation mechanisms as shown in
It is appreciated that the previous description of the disclosed examples is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present disclosure. Various modifications to these examples will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other examples without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosure. Thus, the present disclosure is not intended to be limited to the examples shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/855,688, filed on May 31, 2019, and incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6222503 | Gietema | Apr 2001 | B1 |
8059048 | Felstead | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8319698 | Legay | Nov 2012 | B2 |
9112281 | Bresciani | Aug 2015 | B2 |
20070268192 | Legay | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090079645 | Sotelo | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20180166781 | Snyder | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20200091613 | David | Mar 2020 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
H. Yamada, et al., “Circular Polarization Conversion Reflectarray Suppressing Beam Shift,” in 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting, Atlanta, GA, Jul. 2019, pp. 299-300. |
T. Yekan, et al., “Design of Two Transparent X Band Reflectarray Antennas Integrated on a Satellite Panel,” in 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (APSURSI), Fajardo, PR, Jun. 2016, pp. 1413-1414. |
T. Yekan, et al., “Examination of Two Types of Quasi Transparent Reflectarray Elements,” in 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (APSURSI), Fajardo, PR, Jun. 2016, pp. 1543-1544. |
T. Yekan, et al., “Conformal Integrated Solar Panel Antennas: Two Effective Integration Methods of Antennas With Solar Cells ,” in IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 69-78, Apr. 2017. |
T. Yekan, et al., “Transparent Reflectarray Antenna Printed on Solar Cells,” in 2016 IEEE 43rd Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), Portland, OR, 2016, pp. 2610-2612. |
S. Kausar, et al., “Design of High Gain Low Cost Beam-Steering Reflectarray Antenna,” in 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting, Atlanta, GA, Jul. 2019, pp. 315-316. |
G.-B. Wu, et al., “Millimeter-Wave Filtering Reflectarray for High-Gain Antenna Applications,” in 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting, Atlanta, GA, USA, Jul. 2019, pp. 1493-1494. |
M. Zhou, et al., “Tx/Rx Reflectarray for Multiple Spot Beam Applications in Ka-band,” in 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting, Atlanta, GA, USA, Jul. 2019. |
A. Freni, et al., “Analysis and Design of a High-Gain Folded Reflectarray with Curved Polarizer,” in 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting, Boston, MA, USA, Jul. 2018. |
E. Martinez-de-Rioja, et al., “3-D Bifocal Design Method for Dual-Reflectarray Configurations With Application to Multibeam Satellite Antennas in Ka-Band,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 67, No. 1, pp. 450-460, Jan. 2019. |
D.M. Pozar, et al., “A Shaped-Beam Microstrip Patch Reflectarray,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 47, No. 7, pp. 1167-1173, Jul. 1999. |
J. Li, et al., “Amplitude Controlled Reflectarray Using Non-uniform FSS Reflection Plane,” in 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (APSURSI), Spokane, WA, Aug. 2011, pp. 2180-2183. |
E. Martinez-de-Rioja, et al., “Bifocal Design Procedure for Dual-Reflectarray Antennas in Offset Configurations,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 17, No. 8, pp. 1421-1425, Aug. 2018. |
S. M. Mousavi, et al., “Bowl-Shaped Beam Reflectarray Antenna for Satellite Communication,” in The 8th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP 2014), The Hague, Netherlands, Apr. 2014, pp. 1948-1949. |
E. Carrasco, et al., “Demonstration of a Shaped Beam Reflectarray Using Aperture-Coupled Delay Lines for LMDS Central Station Antenna,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 56, No. 10, pp. 3103-3111, Oct. 2008. |
G. Carluccio, et al., “Design and Manufacture of Cosecant-Squared Complementary Reflectarrays for Low-Cost Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 65, No. 10, pp. 5220-5227, Oct. 2017. |
E. Carrasco, et al., “Design, Manufacture and Test of a Low-Cost Shaped-Beam Reflectarray Using a Single Layer of Varying-Sized Printed Dipoles,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 61, No. 6, pp. 3077-3085, Jun. 2013. |
Taha Shahvirdi Dizaj Yekan, “Transparent Solar Panel Antenna Array,” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, UT, Sep. 2016. |
E. Choi, et al., “W-band Dual-Large-Reflectarray Antenna with Low Sensitivity and Broad Bandwidth Characteristic,” in 2019 URSI International Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory (EMTS), San Diego, CA, May 2019. |
D.R. Prado, et al., “Efficient Crosspolar Optimization of Shaped-Beam Dual-Polarized Reflectarrays Using Full-Wave Analysis for the Antenna Element Characterization,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 623-635, Feb. 2017. |
D.R. Prado, et al., “Efficient Shaped-Beam Reflectarray Design Using Machine Learning Techniques,” in 2018 48th European Microwave Conference (EuMA), Madrid, Sep. 2018, pp. 1545-1548. |
D.R. Prado, et al., “Fast and Accurate Modeling of Dual-Polarized Reflectarray Unit Cells Using Support Vector Machines,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 66, No. 3, pp. 1258-1270, Mar. 2018. |
J.A. Zornoza, et al., “Folded Multilayer Microstrip Reflectarray With Shaped Pattern,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 510-518, Feb. 2006. |
J. Shaker, et al., “Investigation of FSS-Backed Reflectarray Using Different Classes of Cell Elements,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 56, No. 12, pp. 3700-3706, Dec. 2008. |
G.-B. Wu, et al., “Nonuniform FSS-Backed Reflectarray With Synthesized Phase and Amplitude Distribution,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 66, No. 12, pp. 6883-6892, Dec. 2018. |
E.R.F. Almajali, “Reflectarray Antennas: Operating Mechanisms, and Remedies for Problem Aspects,” Ph.D. dissertation. School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada, 2014. |
D. Martinez-De-Rioja, et al., “Reflectarray to Generate Four Adjacent Beams per Feed for Multispot Satellite Antennas,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 67, No. 2, pp. 1265-1269, Feb. 2019. |
J.A. Encinar, et al., “Three-Layer Printed Reflectarrays for Contoured Beam Space Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 52, No. 5, pp. 1138-1148, May 2004. |
A. Tamminen, et al., “Reflectarray Design for 120-GHz Radar Application: Measurement Results,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 61, No. 10, pp. 5036-5047, Oct. 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200381839 A1 | Dec 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62855688 | May 2019 | US |