Metal alloy fluoroborate electroplating baths

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6179985
  • Patent Number
    6,179,985
  • Date Filed
    Friday, March 19, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 30, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
The use of alkali metal, alkaline earth metal, ammonium and substituted ammonium salts of alkyl and alkanol sulfonic acids as additives in pure metal and metal alloy fluoroborate electroplating baths has a number of unexpected benefits including wider useful current density range and improved appearance. The metals and metal alloys include but are not limited to tin, lead, copper, cadmium, indium, iron, tin/lead and tin/lead copper.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Electroplating solutions are usually aqueous. Every plating solution contains ingredients to perform at least the first, and usually several, of the following functions: (1) provide a source of ions of the metal(s) to be deposited; (2) form complexes with ions of the depositing metal; (3) provide conductivity; (4) stabilize the solution against hydrolysis or other forms of decomposition; (5) buffer the pH of the solution; (6) regulate the physical form of the deposit; (7) aid in anode corrosion, and (8) modify other properties peculiar to the solution involved.




The present invention improves the plating performance of the solution, particularly by increasing the useful current density over previously accepted norms. The current density is the average current in amperes divided by the area through which that current passes; the area is usually nominal area, since the true area for any but extremely smooth electrodes is seldom known. Units used in this regard are amperes per square meter (A/m


2


).




It is generally in the best interest of efficiency to run electroplating baths at as high a current density as possible. The higher the current density the faster the coating plates on the surface. The current is carried by the ions in these baths and each type of ion has its own specific conductance. In plating bath, however, ionic conductance is only one variable that must be considered in choosing an electrolyte. The final criterion is the quality of the coating at the desired current density.




Fluoroborate Baths




Fluoroborate plating baths are widely used for coating a variety of metals on all types of metal substitutes including both copper and iron. See for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,431,805; 4,029,556 and 3,770,599. These baths are preferred where plating speed is important and the fluoroborate salts are very soluble. A variety of additives have been developed to improve the performance of these baths. These additives either improve the quality of the deposit, the efficiency of the bath or they reduce environmental effects. See for example, U.S. Patent No. 4,923,576.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to the use of alkali metal, alkaline earth metal, ammonium and substituted ammonium salts of alkyl and alkanol sulfonic acid which were found to improve the performance of fluoroborate electroplating baths. When used in these electroplating baths these salt additives were found to generally increase the plating range so that these baths can be used at much higher current densities, thus these baths can be run at greater speeds than those without these additives. Further improvements are seen in the quality of the deposits.




Thus, the present invention is directed to a method of improving the plating performance of a fluoroborate ion based electroplating bath comprising the step of adding an effective performance enhancing amount of a salt of an alkyl and/or alkanol sulfonic acid to said bath.




The salts used to improve the bath plating performance characteristics are particularly selected from the group consisting of alkali metal, alkaline earth metal, ammonium and substituted ammonium salts. Especially preferred are salts of 2-hydroxy ethyl sulfonic acid, especially the sodium salt (sodium isethionate).




The baths that can be improved by the present invention include tin and tin alloy plating baths; nickel and nickel alloy plating baths; copper and copper alloy plating baths; zinc or zinc alloy plating baths; as well as cadmium and cadmium alloy plating baths.




DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




The use of alkali metal, alkaline earth metal, ammonium and substituted ammonium salts of alkyl and alkanol sulfonic acids as additives in pure metal and metal alloy fluoroborate electroplating baths has a number of unexpected benefits including wider useful current density range and improved appearance. The metals and metal alloys include but are not limited to tin, lead, copper, cadmium, indium, iron, tin/lead and tin/lead copper.




These salts are not harmful to the environment, they are completely biodegradable and the products of the biodegradation are common ions and molecules found in the environment. In addition they have a number of other advantages including high solderability, low corrosivity to equipment, good stability at high temperatures, and compatibility with other metal salts.




These baths also contain the corresponding metal salt or metal salts if an alloy plate is required, and various additives to control the quality and appearance of the plated surface and the stability of the bath solution. Typical additives include a surfactant such as an ethoxylated fatty alcohol, a brightening agent if required and an antioxidant such as hydroquinone or catechol, if tin is one of the metals being plated.




The present invention will be further illustrated with reference to the following example which will aid in the understanding of the present invention, but which is not to be construed as a limitation thereof All percentages reported herein, unless otherwise specified, are percent by weight. All temperatures are expressed in degrees Celsius.











EXAMPLE # 1




Standard Hull Cell tests using a 267 mm Hull Cell were run at 2 Amps for 5 minutes using cathode rod agitation. Copper panels were plated after acid cleaning and rinsing.




Bath Composition:




35% v/v HBF


4


(as a 50% solution)




15 g/liter Tin (as Tin Fluoroborate)




12 g/liter Lead (as Lead Fluoroborate)




2 g/liter Hydroquinone




26 g/liter Boric Acid




2% v/v HBF


4


Makeup

















Run #




Additive




Results











1




None




Gray matte deposit with a 5 mm wide








burn at the high current density edge.






2




20 g/l Sodium




Lightening of deposit and burn narrows







Methane Sulfonate




to 4 mm wide burn.






3




20 g/l Sodium




Lightening of deposit and burn narrows







Isethionate




to 3.5 mm wide.














This experiment shows that upon addition of sodium methane sulfonate or sodium isethionate, this bath can be used at a higher current density and the appearance of the coating expands.




Theory Section




While not wishing to be bound by theory, the results of the present invention are believed to be based upon the following:




The mixture of different ionic species forms a unique combination that can produce metallic coatings with required properties. It is well known that the overall ionic conductivity of the solution depends on the character of individual ionic species and their concentrations. The specific interactions between different ionic species and/or solvent molecules determine the overall conductivity and may affect electrodeposition processes. However, ionic conductivity is only one variable, which must be considered in formulating plating baths.




It is also well known that the structure of the electrical double layer can affect the rates of electrodeposition. It was proven experimentally, see for example, Lasia et al.,


Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry,


266, 68-81 (1989); Fawcett et al.,


Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry,


279, 243-256 (1990); Lasia et al.,


Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry,


288, 153-165 (1990) and Balch et al.,


Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry,


427, 137-146 (1997), that the rate constant of electroreduction of certain metal ions (like Cu


+


, Cd


2+


or Zn


2+


) depends on the solvating ability of the solvent and the size of the cation of the electrolyte. The effect was attributed to the electrostatic interactions in the inner layer of the electrical double layer.




According to the Frumkin model, the rate constant for the reduction process:






Met


n+


ne→Met


0








is given by:








ln k




f




=ln


(


k




0


γ


M


)+α


a




nFφ




d




/RT−α




a




nF


(


E−E




s


)/


RT








where the symbols are:




k


f


apparent rate constant




k


0


potential independent portion of the rate constant




γ


M


activity coefficient of the species Met


n+


in the bulk solution




α


a


apparent transfer coefficient for reduction




n number of electrons involved in electroreduction




F Faraday constant




φ


d


potential drop across the diffuse layer




R gas constant




T temperature in K




E potential




E


s


standard potential of the electroreduction reaction




It is also known that the size of the counter ion of supporting electrolyte affects the φ


d


potential, and as a consequence, the rate constant of overall electroreduction process (Lasia et al., Fawcett et al., and Lasia et al., supra).




It is clear that the addition of one or more salts as taught herein modifies the double layer of metal/solution interface. The modification is caused by the alkali metal cation and/or alkanol-sulfonic acid anion and/or combination of both of them (maybe alkyl-, also). Therefore, the added salt of an alkyl and/or alkanol sulfonic acid should be considered as a plating additive, rather than as a simple modification of the supporting electrolyte. In the present invention, the cation and/or anion are not added only to preserve ionic conductivity of the electrolyte and/or solubility of deposited ion(s); instead they directly affect the electrodeposition process, by affecting the double layer structure and in consequence the mechanism of the electroreduction process.




The present invention has been described in detail, including the preferred embodiments thereof However, it will be appreciated that those skilled in the art, upon consideration of the present disclosure, may make modifications and/or improvements on this invention and still be within the scope and spirit of this invention as set forth in the following claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method of improving the plating performance of an aqueous fluoroborate based electroplating bath comprising the step of adding an effective amount of a salt of an alkyl and/or alkanol sulfonic acid to said bath to enhance the electroplating performance of the bath, wherein the salt is selected from the group consisting of alkali metal, alkaline earth metal, and ammonium or substituted ammonium salt.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the salt is a salt of 2-hydroxy ethyl sulfonic acid.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the salt is sodium isethionate.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein the electroplating bath is a tin or tin alloy electroplating bath.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein the electroplating bath is a lead or lead alloy electroplating bath.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein the electroplating bath is a copper or copper alloy electroplating bath.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein the electroplating bath is a indium or indium alloy electroplating bath.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein the electroplating bath is a iron or iron alloy electroplating bath.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein the electroplating bath is a cadmium or cadmium alloy electroplating bath.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein the electroplating bath is a tin/lead electroplating bath.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein the electroplating bath is a tin/lead/copper electroplating bath.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the improvement in the plating performance comprises at least an increase in the useful upper current density range of the electroplating bath.
  • 13. An aqueous metal alloy fluoroborate electroplating bath comprising:(a) a source of fluoroborate ions; (b) one or more soluble metal salts, wherein the metal is selected from the group consisting of tin, lead, cadmium, indium, iron, and mixtures thereof; and (c) an effective amount of a salt of an alkyl and/or alkanol sulfonic acid to said bath to enhance the electroplating performance of the bath, wherein the salt is selected from the group consisting of alkali metal, alkaline earth metal, and ammonium or substituted ammonium salt.
  • 14. The electroplating bath of claim 13, wherein the sulfonic acid salt is a salt of 2-hydroxy ethyl sulfonic acid.
  • 15. The electroplating bath of claim 14, wherein the sulfonic acid salt is sodium isethionate.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present invention is related to the following commonly owned co-pending applications filed on even date herewith; Metal Alloy Halide Electroplating Baths, U.S. Ser. No. 09/272,550; Metal Alloy Sulfonate Electroplating Baths, U.S. Ser. No. 09/272,551, all filed Mar. 19, 1999 and still pending; and Metal Alloy Sulfate Electroplating Baths, U.S. Ser. No. 09/272,800; the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (17)
Number Name Date Kind
2525942 Proell Oct 1950
2910413 Strauss et al. Oct 1959
3770599 Martin Nov 1973
4029556 Monaco et al. Jun 1977
4459185 Obata et al. Jul 1984
4717460 Nobel et al. Jan 1988
4828657 Fukuoka et al. May 1989
4871429 Nobel et al. Oct 1989
4923576 Kroll et al. May 1990
5051154 Bernards et al. Sep 1991
5066367 Nobel et al. Nov 1991
5174886 King et al. Dec 1992
5431805 McDermott et al. Jul 1995
5492615 Houman Feb 1996
5538617 Steinbicker et al. Jul 1996
5562814 Kirby Oct 1996
5759381 Sakurai et al. Jun 1998
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
0 455 166 A1 Jun 1991 EP
0 787 834 A1 Jan 1997 EP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (5)
Entry
Meibuhr et al., Noble Metal Resistors in Microcircuits, “The Mechanism of the Inhibition of Stannous-Ion Oxidation by Phenolsulfonic Acid”, vol. 2, No. 9-10, Sep. -Oct. 1964, pp. 267-273.
Lasia et al.,“Double-layer effects in the kinetics of the CD2+/CD (Hg) system in dimethylsulfoxide”, J. Electroanal. Chem., 266 (1989), pp. 69-81, no month available.
Fawcett et al., “Double layer effects in the kinetics of electroreduction of zinc(II) at mercury in dimethylformamide and dimethysulfoxide”, J. Electroanal. Chem., 279 (1990), pp. 243-256, no month available.
Balch et al., “The solvent effect on the electrochemical behavior of C60 films in the presenceof alkali-metal cations”, Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry427 (1997), pp. 137-146, no month available.
Lasia et al., “Mechanism ofo zinc(II) reduction in DMSO on mercury”, J. Electroanal. Chem., 288 (1990), pp. 153-164, no month available.