This application generally relates to transporting or gettering materials disposed within semiconductor substrates.
As is known in the art of semiconductor processing, semiconductor substrates are susceptible to contamination that may degrade their electrical properties. In particular, although a semiconductor substrate initially may a relatively high purity when it is formed, subsequent processing of that substrate may introduce contamination. For example, silicon substrates of about 99.9999999% purity may be formed using known techniques, such as the Czochralski process. However, exposing that substrate to multiple materials processing steps, such as may be performed when fabricating electronic circuitry on the substrate, may contaminate the substrate with one or more elements, such as calcium, iron, or sodium. Additionally, the electronic circuitry itself may contaminate the semiconductor substrate over time. For example,
Several methods, which may be referred to as “gettering,” have been developed for reducing contamination within regions of semiconductor substrates. For example, the backside of a semiconductor substrate (the major surface opposite that upon which electronic circuitry 120 may be disposed) may be treated in a variety of ways intended to attract, or “getter,” contamination. Such treatment may include damaging the backside of the substrate, such as with a laser beam or mechanical abrasion, so as to induce stress at that surface. Subsequently annealing the substrate may create dislocations within the crystal structure of the substrate that may attract and bind, or “getter,” contaminants away from the circuitry-side of the substrate. Or, for example, the backside of the substrate may be exposed to a source of phosphorous so as to generate dislocations within the crystal structure of the substrate that may getter contaminants away from the circuitry-side of the substrate. Or, for example, the substrate may be treated so as to have a suitable percentage of oxygen therein, and subsequently may be treated to cause that oxygen to precipitate out as clusters that generate dislocations that may getter contaminants away from electronic circuitry 120 and active regions 111.
Gettering methods such as described above may require relatively harsh treatments to the entire semiconductor substrate, and may reduce the mechanical stability of the semiconductor substrate. Thus, what is needed is an improved method for gettering materials disposed within a semiconductor substrate, and more generally for transporting materials disposed on or within a semiconductor substrate.
Embodiments of the present invention provide metal structures for transporting or gettering materials disposed on or within a semiconductor substrate.
Under one aspect of the present invention, a structure is provided for transporting a material disposed on or within a semiconductor substrate. The structure includes a metal structure disposed within the semiconductor substrate and at a spaced distance from the material. The metal structure is configured to transport the material through the semiconductor substrate and to concentrate the material at the metal structure.
In some embodiments, the material includes a contaminant disposed within the semiconductor substrate. The structure further may include electronic circuitry disposed on the semiconductor substrate, and the contaminant includes a second metal originating from the electronic circuitry. The semiconductor substrate may include, for example, silicon. The metal structure may include, for example, platinum. The second metal may include, for example, H, Al, Ca, Cu, Fe, or Na. The contaminant may diffuse through the semiconductor substrate and may interfere with operation of the electronic circuitry in the absence of the metal structure.
The metal structure may include, for example, Al, Au, Ag, Ca, Cu, K, Li, Mn, Na, Pt, or Rb. The material may include a second metal, such as H, Al, Au, Ag, Ca, Cu, K, Li, Mn, Na, Pt, or Rb, preferably which is different than the metal of the metal structure.
In some embodiments, the substrate may have an aperture defined in an upper surface thereof, and the metal structure may be disposed within the aperture. Alternatively, the metal structure may be disposed within the substrate using ion implantation. The material may be disposed within the substrate using ion implantation.
Under another aspect of the present invention, method is provided for transporting a material disposed on or within a semiconductor substrate. The method may include disposing a metal structure within the semiconductor substrate and at a spaced distance from the material; transporting the material through the semiconductor substrate with the metal structure; and concentrating the material at the metal structure.
Embodiments of the present invention provide metal structures for transporting or gettering materials within a semiconductor substrate. The metal structures may be disposed near the surface of the substrate, e.g., may be disposed within apertures that are defined within the substrate, or may be embedded below the surface of the substrate, e.g., using ion implantation. The metal structures are configured to attract a material within the substrate, so as to transport the material thereto laterally or vertically through the substrate, and to concentrate the material at the metal structure. Where the material is a contaminant, such a transportation process may be referred to as “gettering.” However, the same process suitably may be applied to transport materials other than contaminants through a substrate, for example to form functional structures of those materials within the substrate. That is, gettering is a particularly useful subset of the material transportation processes provided herein.
In particular, the present inventors have recognized that a suitable metal structure within a semiconductor substrate may be used to modify the behavior of another material that is disposed on, or within, the substrate. For example, in the absence of the metal structure, a contaminant may diffuse into or through the substrate, or a material may remain disposed in a particular plane or location on or within the substrate. The metal structure may cause the contaminant instead to become concentrated at the metal structure, or may cause the material to move out of the plane or location and into a new plane or location at the metal structure. Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the metal structure modifies the local environment experienced by the contaminant or other material, driving the contaminant or other material to favor different kinetic and thermodynamic processes (including concentration or diffusion) than it would without the metal structure present. Moreover, the specific pressure created by the surrounding substrate and temperature changes created by heating also may modify the local environment of the contaminant or other material. Thus, by controlling the characteristics of the metal structure relative to the substrate, and by heating the substrate as appropriate, a contaminant or other material may be controllably transported through the substrate. As such, embodiments of the present invention enable the preparation of semiconductor-based electronic devices with reduced contamination, as well as different structures than otherwise may not readily be prepared using previously known techniques.
First, several exemplary metal structures, and the use thereof for transporting or gettering a material disposed on or within a semiconductor substrate, will be described. Then, an exemplary method and system for preparing and using such structures will be described. An example of a structure that was observed to transport material within a semiconductor substrate then will be described.
Semiconductor substrate 210 may be formed of silicon, germanium, gallium phosphide, gallium nitride, gallium arsenide, indium phosphide, or other suitable semiconductor material, and may be of relatively high initial purity. For example, as noted above, silicon substrates formed using the Czochralski process may have a purity of 99.9999999%. Substrate 210 may include structures defined therein, such as conductive lines, insulator layers, doped semiconductor regions, and the like, such as illustrative active region 211. Electronic circuitry 220 disposed on upper surface 212 of substrate 210 may include conductive electrodes or interconnects, generally designated 221. Such electrodes or interconnects 221 may be formed of Al or Cu, as well as other structures and materials such as conductors, insulators, and semiconductors (not specifically illustrated).
As noted above, semiconductor substrates with electronic circuitry thereon are susceptible to contamination.
As illustrated in
Because the power of metal structure 240 to getter contamination 230 may decrease as a function of increasing distance between the structure and the contamination, metal structure 240 preferably is located sufficiently close to electronic circuitry 220 so as to substantially getter contamination originating therefrom, but sufficiently far from the electronic circuitry so as to inhibit any contamination concentrated thereat from interfering with operation of the circuitry. Indeed, an suitable number of such metal structures 240 may be disposed within substrate 110 and at spaced distances from electronic circuitry 220 so as to achieve sufficient gettering of contamination 230. In comparison, the distance between treated region 112 and electronic circuitry 120 illustrate in
Although
As noted above, gettering is only one exemplary type of material transport process that may be facilitated by the present metal structures. Indeed, the present metal structures suitably may be adapted to facilitate transport of a desired material, and in particular a metal, within a substrate. For example,
Metal layer 421 may be disposed adjacent to diffusion blocking layer 411, and both of layers 421, 411 may be disposed at a defined depth within substrate 410. Diffusion blocking layer 411 may be formed of any suitable material, such as silicon dioxide, silicon carbide, graphene, or diamond like carbon. Both metal layer 421 and metal structure 440 may be made from a metal such as Al, Au, Ag, Ca, Cu, K, Li, Mn, Na, Pt, or Rb, although the metal of the metal layer preferably is different than the metal of the metal structure. Exemplary methods of using ion implantation to form diffusion blocking layers and metal layers are described in greater detail in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2012/0235281, published Sep. 20, 2012 and entitled “Systems and Methods for Preparing Films Comprising Metal Using Sequential Ion Implantation, and Films Formed Using Same,” the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.
As illustrated in
Additionally, it should be noted that in some embodiments, the transport of metal from metal layer 421 to metal structure 440 may be “self-limiting.” Specifically, formation of metal film 431 on the lower surface 441 of metal structure 440 may modify the metal structure's ability to transport the metal from metal layer 421 to lower surface 441. Accordingly, metal film 431 may grow to a thickness based on the attraction between metal structure 440 and metal layer 421 and based on a reduction in that attraction that may be caused by the presence of metal film 431.
Although
As illustrated in
As illustrated by the exemplary arrangements of
With reference to
The selected processing parameters of the metal structure may include selecting whether to dispose the metal structure near the upper surface of the substrate, e.g., as illustrated in
Then, the selected substrate, having the material to be transported disposed thereon or therein, is provided and prepared (620). Non-limiting examples of suitable semiconductor substrates include silicon, germanium, gallium phosphide, gallium nitride, gallium arsenide, and indium phosphide. The substrate may, for example, be a wafer, e.g., a single-crystal wafer, or may be a film disposed on a solid support such as glass or sapphire. The substrate may be monocrystalline, and optionally may have a particular crystalline orientation. For example, Si substrates are available in various crystallographic orientations, such as [100] or [111], either of which may be suitable. Alternatively, the substrate may be polycrystalline, or even amorphous. The material may be disposed thereon or therein using any suitable method. For example, as described above with reference to
Then, the metallic structure is disposed within the substrate at a spaced distance from the material (step 630). Any suitable combination of steps may be used to dispose the metallic structure at a desired location within the substrate. For example, an aperture may be formed in the substrate and a metal disposed within the aperture (step 631). As illustrated in
Or, for example, metal ions may be implanted within the substrate (step 632). As illustrated in
Note that steps 631 and 632 are intended to be illustrative, and it should be appreciated that other suitable methods of forming metallic structures may be used, including methods that have yet to be developed.
The material then may be transported through the substrate with the metallic structure (step 640) and concentrated at the metallic structure (step 650). Such transport and concentration may be facilitated by heating the substrate to a suitable temperature, e.g., to about 100° C. or less, or to about 200° C. or less, or to about 300° C. or less, or to about 400° C. or less, or to about 500° C. or less. Exemplary structures that may result from steps 640 and 650 are described further above with reference to
Responsive to user input provided through input device 980, e.g., user input defining a desired metal structure to be prepared, controller 910 requests database 940 to provide information on how to prepare that type of metal structure. Responsive to the request, database 940 provides some or all of the following information to the controller 910: the type of substrate to be used (including the material disposed thereon or therein, and any masks to be disposed thereon); any required preparation thereof; the type of metal to be used to form the metal structure; and the processing parameters thereof. Controller 910 receives this information and stores it in memory 950. Processor 960 processes the stored information, and based on that information displays instructions to the user via display device 970 and controls stage 920 and metal source 930 to process the substrate 210 as appropriate.
In one example, the user uses input device 980, e.g., a keyboard and mouse, to input to the controller that he desires to prepare a metal structure such as illustrated in
Next, the user places the prepared Si substrate 210 on stage 920, and uses input device 980 to inform controller 910 that the substrate is ready. Responsive to this input, processor 960 instructs stage 920 to move to a pre-determined position in the x, y, and z direction for ion implantation and to heat substrate 210 to a pre-determined temperature, based on the stored instructions. Processor 960 then instructs metal source 930 to implant metal ions at the dose and energy defined in the stored instructions (step 632 in
It should be appreciated that any of the user-performed steps may alternatively be automated using commercially available equipment (not illustrated). For example, instead of displaying to the user what type of substrate and mask is to be provided, controller 910 may instead be in operable communication with a robotic substrate handler that may obtain substrate 210 from a substrate store, and may process the substrate as required to provide the mask. In one embodiment, one or more steps of an instruction sequence are made contingent on a feedback parameter. For example, the characteristics of the substrate may change as different steps (e.g., heating, ion implantation, etching), and these changes may be automatically characterized, for example using spectroscopy. The system may include instructions to move to a different step in the process after a pre-determined change to the substrate is characterized.
It should also be appreciated that the illustrative sequences of steps described above suitably may be modified so as to provide appropriate metal structures that are configured to transport and concentrate desired materials, and particularly metals, within a substrate.
An exemplary platinum structure that was used to transport aluminum within a silicon substrate now will be described with reference to
It is believed that the metal structures provided herein suitably may be used to form structures that otherwise may be difficult to form. For example, metal layer 421 and metal film 431 illustrated in
Although various embodiments of the invention are described herein, it will be evident to one skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the invention. It is intended in the appended claims to cover all such changes and modifications that fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3976511 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4517226 | Baldi et al. | May 1985 | A |
4677740 | Shifrin et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4757369 | Jackson et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4993034 | Aoki et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5133757 | Sioshansi et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5725573 | Dearnaley et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5822347 | Yokogawa et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5953603 | Kim | Sep 1999 | A |
6252294 | Hattori et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6274460 | Delgado et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6432844 | Farrar | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6472109 | Rolfson | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6590271 | Liu et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6709961 | Noda | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6753240 | Hayashida | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6815301 | Shindo | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6833313 | Hayakawa | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7005340 | Hayashi | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7012274 | Taylor | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7056816 | Shibata | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7170083 | Freeman et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7214614 | Chopra et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7419915 | Abraham et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7419917 | Abraham | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7510786 | Veerasamy et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7544398 | Chang et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7799589 | Akiyama et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7861575 | Jun et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8021778 | Snyder et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8158532 | Mayer et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8269931 | Abraham et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8309438 | Colombo et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8368155 | Abraham et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8507797 | Veerasamy | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8625064 | Abraham et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
9048179 | Abraham et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
20020182827 | Abe et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030082882 | Babcock et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030082892 | Fan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030207044 | Sopori | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040082149 | Sakaguchi et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040188725 | Fujiwara et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050186759 | So | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050250289 | Babcock et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050250328 | Fujii | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060078024 | Matsumura et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060115965 | Abraham | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070020893 | Ueno et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070217458 | Kitano et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080073643 | Ryu et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080197362 | Hisamoto et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090020764 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090032831 | Akiyama et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090072243 | Suda et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090078974 | Nagai et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090151429 | Jun et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090242935 | Fitzgerald | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090273034 | Woon et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100006855 | Park et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100323113 | Ramappa et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120003438 | Appleton et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120049200 | Abraham et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120083103 | Shifren et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120235281 | Abraham et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120301095 | Abraham et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120312693 | Veerasamy | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20140141604 | Abraham et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1123340 | May 1996 | CN |
1348018 | May 2002 | CN |
19730296 | Jan 1999 | DE |
1402 | Feb 2001 | EA |
0363944 | Apr 1990 | EP |
2138884 | Jan 2000 | ES |
2422246 | Jul 2006 | GB |
61-006319 | Jan 1986 | JP |
1-042564 | Feb 1989 | JP |
1-283824 | Nov 1989 | JP |
1-283825 | Nov 1989 | JP |
2-270974 | Nov 1990 | JP |
3-229854 | Oct 1991 | JP |
4-042920 | Feb 1992 | JP |
4-290429 | Oct 1992 | JP |
5-205616 | Aug 1993 | JP |
6-056481 | Mar 1994 | JP |
6-132259 | May 1994 | JP |
8-274268 | Oct 1996 | JP |
2000-093503 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2004-315876 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2006-000219 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2008-022696 | Jan 2008 | JP |
2004-0022639 | Mar 2004 | KR |
201029057 | Aug 2010 | TW |
WO 9826457 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 0172104 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 03086496 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2005043603 | May 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,826, filed Nov. 21, 2013, Abraham et al. |
Belov et al., “Formation and ‘White’ Photoluminescence of Nanoclusters in SiOx Films Implanted with Carbon Ions,” ISSN 1063-7826, Seminconductors, vol. 44, No. 11, pp. 1450-1456 (2010). |
Borders et al., “Formation of SiC in Silicon by Ion Implantation,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 18, No. 11, pp. 509-511 (Jun. 1, 1971). |
Chandrasekhar et al., “Strategies for the synthesis of highly concentrated Sil-yCy diamond-structured systems,” Applied Physics Letters 72 (1998) 2117-2119. |
Di et al., “Thermal stability of diamondlike carbon buried layer fabricated by plasma immersion ion implantation and deposition in silicon on insulator,” Journal Applied Physics, 98:053502 (2005). |
Di et al., “Fabrication of silicon-on-Si O2/diamondlike-carbon dual insulator using ion cutting and mitigation of self-heating effects,” Journal Applied Physics, 88:142108 (2006). |
Friedland et al., “Dependence of critical damage energies in diamond on electronic stopping,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 158-159, pp. 64-68 (2002). |
Harbsmeier et al., “Epitaxial regrowth of C- and N-implanted silicon and α-quartz,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, vol. 136-138, pp. 263-267 (1998). |
Huang et al., “Growth of nearly one nanometer large silicon particles in silicon carbide and their quantum-confined photoluminescence features,” Nanotechnology, vol. 18, 445605, pp. 1-5 (2007). |
Jambois et al., “Field effect white and tunable electroluminescence from ion beam synthesized Si- and C-rich SiO2 layers,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 91, No. 21, pp. 211105-1 to 211105-3 (2007). |
Jambois et al., “White electroluminescence from C- and Si-rich thin silicon oxides,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 89, No. 25, pp. 253124-1 to 253124-3 (2006). |
Kantor et al., “Evolution of implanted carbon in silicon upon pulsed excimer laser annealing,” Applied Physics Letters 69 (1996) 969-971. |
Katharria et al., “Synthesis of buried SiC using an energetic ion beam,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 39 (2006) 3969-3973. |
Krause et al., “Structure of silicon carbide precipitates in oxygen-implanted and annealed silicon-on-insulator material,” Applied Physics Letters 53 (1988) 63-65. |
Martin et al., “High-temperature ion beam synthesis of cubic SiC,” J.Appl. Phys., vol. 67, No. 6, pp. 2908-2912 (1990). |
Moore et al., “Laser micromachining of thin films for optoelectronic devices and packages,” Laser Micromachining for Optoelectronic Device Fabrication, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4941, pp. 140-147 (2003). |
Nguyen et al., “Spectroscopic ellipsometry studies of crystalline silicon implanted with carbon ions,” Journal of Applied Physics 67 (1990) 3555-3559. |
Pellegrino et al., “Time-resolved analysis of the white photoluminescence from SiO2 films after Si and C coimplantation,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 84, No. 1, pp. 25-27 (2004). |
Perez-Rodriguez et al., “White luminescence from Si+ and C+ ion-implanted SiO2 films,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 94, No. 1, pp. 254-262 (2003). |
Serre et al., “β-SiC on SiO2 formed by ion implantation and bonding for micromechanics applications,” Sensors and Actuators, vol. 47, pp. 169-173 (1999). |
Taylor et al., “Carbon precipitation in silicon: Why is it so difficult?” Applied Physics Letters 62 (1993) 3336-3338. |
Terakado et al. “Modification of surface condition and irradiation effects of synchrotron radiation on photoexcited etching of SiC,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 2715-2720 (1995). |
Tetelbaum et al., “Effect of carbon implantation on visible luminescence and composition of Si-implanted SiO2 layers,” Surface and Coatings Technology 203, pp. 2658-2663 (2009). |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/567,998, 15 pages (mailed Sep. 19, 2013). |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/567,998, 12 pages, (mailed Jan. 15, 2013). |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/584,939, 8 pages (mailed May 9, 2012). |
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/584,939, 10 pages (mailed Dec. 1, 2011). |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/049,762, 11 pages (mailed Mar. 1, 2013). |
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/049,762, 13 pages (mailed Aug. 3, 2012). |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/049,762, 11 pages (mailed Jun. 18, 2013). |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/049,762, 11 pages (mailed Dec. 27, 2013). |
Vickridge et al., “Limiting step involved in the thermal growth of silicon oxide films on silicon carbide,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 89, No. 25, pp. 256102-1 to 256102-4 (2002). |
Wong et al., “Cross-section transmission electron microscopy study of carbon-implanted layers in silicon,” Applied Physics Letters 57 (1990) 798-800. |
Wong et al., “Infrared absorption spectroscopy study of phase formation in SiC layers synthesized by carbon implantation into silicon with a metal vapor vacuum arc ion source,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, vol. 140, pp. 70-74 (1998). |
Doolittle, Alan, “Lecture 5: Ion Implanation, Reading: Chapter 5,” Georgia Tech. |
Krumbein, Simeon, “Metallic Electromigration Phenomena,” Presented at the 33rd Meeting of the IEEE Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts, Chicago, Illinois, Sep. 21-23 (1987). |
Li et al., “Effects of post-annealing on Schottky contacts of Pt/ZnO films toward UV photodetector,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 509(26):7193-7197 (Abstract only) (2011). |
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/049,762, 13 pages (mailed Mar. 1, 2013). |
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/049,762, 14 pages (mailed Jun. 6, 2014). |
USPTO Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,826, 9 pages (mailed Aug. 29, 2014). |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/049,762, 11 pages (mailed Aug. 3, 2012). |
USPTO Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,826, 9 pages (mailed Apr. 10, 2014). |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/049,762, 10 pages (mailed Sep. 26, 2014). |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,826, mailed Feb. 9, 2015 (7 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140264757 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |