This invention relates generally to imaging and treatment systems, and more particularly to methods and apparatus for aligning an object being scanned in multi-modality systems.
At least some multi-modality imaging and treatment systems are capable of using a combination of different modalities, such as, for example, Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Single Positron emission tomography (SPECT), Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Computed Tomography (CT), Static X-Ray imaging, Dynamic (Fluoroscopy) X-Ray imaging, and radio-therapy. In a multi-modality system (sometimes referred to as a multi-modal system), a portion of the imaging hardware is utilized to perform different scans or treatments, (e.g., an image produced by SPECT is processed and displayed respectively, by the same computer and display, as an image produced by CT). However, the data acquisition systems (also referred to as an “imaging assembly”) may be different. For example, on a CT/SPECT system, a radiation source and a radiation detector are used in combination to acquire CT data, while a radiopharmaceutical is typically employed in combination with a SPECT camera to acquire SPECT data.
In multi-modality systems, such as, for example, an integrated SPECT/CT system there may be an inherent registration of the SPECT and CT images the system acquires. Because the patient lies motionless on the same table during the SPECT and CT portions of the acquisition, the patient may be in a consistent position and orientation during the two acquisitions, greatly simplifying the process of correlating and combining the CT and SPECT images. This allows the CT image to be used to provide attenuation correction information for the reconstruction of the SPECT image, and allows an image reader to easily correlate the anatomic information presented in the CT image and the functional information presented in the SPECT image.
This inherent registration assumes an alignment of the SPECT and CT detector coordinate systems, or at least a known spatial transformation between the two coordinate systems. A misalignment of the coordinate systems may directly result in a misregistration of the images. Misregistration results not only in inaccurate localization, but also to incorrect attenuation correction of the functional image.
Proper SPECT and CT image registration may also require an alignment of the axial (z) axis of the SPECT and CT coordinate systems not only with each other, but also with the travel axis of the table that transports the patient between and during the SPECT and CT acquisitions. A co-axial SPECT/CT or other multi-modality system, especially for whole body scans, requires a relatively long axial travel distance to permit both imaging modalities the ability to image the region of interest. However, a patient table and table support may not be able to accommodate the alignment requirements while supporting a patient cantilevered out from the table support during an examination due to the extreme length of travel the patient table must travel to reach both imaging assemblies. For example, a co-axial imaging assembly arrangement requires a relatively long rail system, and the length of the bed may induce bending thereof, such that the patient position may change between the two imaging stations, even if the patient remains absolutely stationary.
A hospital suite may be space-limited and multiple modality systems require typically more floor space than a single-modality imaging unit. Additionally, patients preparing for the diagnostic imaging procedure must be loaded onto the table prior to the procedure, and unloaded from the table subsequent to the procedure. This loading and unloading can be difficult and uncomfortable for a patient who may have suffered recent trauma. Finally, the patient must be rigidly and accurately positioned and supported between imaging modalities and during each imaging procedure.
In one embodiment an apparatus for examining a patient is provided. The apparatus includes a top plate, at least one top rail slideably coupled to the top plate, the top plate selectively positionable between a first imaging position and a second imaging position along an examination axis, a support member coupled to the at least one top rail, the support member configured to selectively change a position of the top plate along an axis perpendicular to the examination axis, the support member comprises at least one guide pin slideably coupled to the at least one rail during movement of the support member, the guide pin configured to retain the support member to the at least one top rail when the top rail is moved between a first modality position and a second modality position.
In another embodiment, an imaging system is provided. The imaging system includes a first and a second imaging assembly for obtaining medical diagnostic images of a patient for at least first and second imaging modalities, said imaging assemblies being substantially aligned along an examination axis, and a stretcher for supporting an object to be imaged, said stretcher positionable along said examination axis, said stretcher slideably coupled to a top plate, said top plate positionable in a first imaging modality position; said top plate positionable in a second imaging modality position.
In another embodiment a method of examining a patient is provided, the method comprises positioning a top plate in a first modality position, positioning the stretcher axially at a first imaging modality position, imaging the patient using a first imaging modality, positioning the top plate axially at a second imaging modality position, and imaging the patient using a second imaging modality.
It is contemplated that the various embodiments of the invention may be implemented with any multi-modality imaging systems, such as, for example, but not limited to, a CT/SPECT imaging system as well as systems having currently known or later developed modalities as well as combinations, such as, for example, but not limited to, a combination SPECT/ultrasound system, a CT/MRI system, and/or a CT/NM system.
The above-described embodiments of multi-modality imaging systems provide a cost-effective and reliable means for examining a patient. Specifically, a patient may be positioned for diagnostic imaging by a first modality, then translated substantially along the imaging axis to a second imaging modality, wherein the gravitational sag of the patient is substantially the same at both axial locations. Accordingly, the multi-modality imaging systems described above provide for maintaining an accurate registration of images from separate modalities in a cost effective and reliable manner.
An exemplary embodiment of a multi-modality imaging system is described above in detail. The multi-modality imaging system components illustrated are not limited to the specific embodiments described herein, but rather, components of each multi-modality imaging system may be utilized independently and separately from other components described herein. For example, the multi-modality imaging system components described above also may be used in combination with other imaging systems.
While the invention has been described in terms of various specific embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4449262 | Jahsman et al. | May 1984 | A |
4558847 | Coates | Dec 1985 | A |
4613122 | Manabe | Sep 1986 | A |
4984774 | Zupancic et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5590429 | Boomgaarden et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5953776 | Sanders et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6211523 | Gagnon | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6242743 | DeVito et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6302579 | Meyer et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6399951 | Paulus et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6449331 | Nutt et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456684 | Mun et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6516478 | Cook et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6574808 | Brown et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6614871 | Kobiki et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6615428 | Pattee | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6640363 | Pattee et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6670614 | Plut et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6720812 | Tumer et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6729263 | Miale et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6955464 | Tybinkowski et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7024710 | Izuhara | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7043784 | Plannerer | May 2006 | B2 |
7065813 | Hoth et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7292673 | Kroner et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
20020104163 | Reimann | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030105397 | Tumer et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030128801 | Eisenberg et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040200001 | Stolze et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040261176 | Plannerer | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040261177 | Hoth et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050023471 | Wang et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050082487 | Amano | Apr 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2000-102529 | Apr 2000 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060241408 A1 | Oct 2006 | US |