Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The present invention relates generally to supports: racks, and more particularly to devices having a structure which is designed to support a particular article consisting of a handle and working bristles (e.g., a paint brush).
Many professional and amateur seek to minimize the expense that painting entails. The main areas where this can be managed are in reducing the costs of the tools used and in increasing the efficiency of the labor required.
Of present interest, a tool widely used in painting is paint brushes. One typically gets what they pay for. Experienced painters know that one expensive brush may be better than a handful of cheap brushes. Good brushes can be cleaned and reused, and good brushes are robust and do not rapidly deteriorate and adversely affect the quality of the work being done.
The ability to clean and reuse paint brushes clearly reduces tool cost. Less obviously, it can also increase labor efficiency. To the extent that brushes can be reused longer, there is less labor inefficiency in having to procure new brushes. Counter balancing this, however, the cleaning of brushes can take appreciable time and effort, decreasing labor efficiency. Thus, while the general advice of brush manufactures is to clean paint brushes immediately after use, painters know that this can entail more labor, and they may opt for simply soaking brushes overnight and having less effort being able to use brushes again the next day.
Another widely used item in painting, viewable as a material or a “tool,” is brush cleaning solvents. The best solvent to use will largely be dictated by the type of paint being used. Water is commonly used to remove water based paints and glues; mineral spirits or paint thinners are used to remove oil based paints; denatured alcohol is used for shellacs; and mineral spirits are used for varnishes. All of these solvents evaporate to varying degrees. Water is relatively inexpensive, and making extra effort to minimizing its evaporation as a means to reduce solvent cost is rarely worthwhile. In contrast, all of the other solvents here are more expensive and minimizing their evaporation as a means to reduce solvent cost can be quite worthwhile. Moreover, worker exposure to these evaporated non-water solvents can be unhealthy and their presence can pose significant fire and explosion hazards.
Yet another widely used item in painting is the paint itself. In general, once an appropriate type of paint for a task at hand is chosen, there is little that one can do to change the cost. A limited exception to this, however, is that empty paint containers can sometimes be re-tasked and used to replace other containers that would have to be purchased. Thus, it is common in North America to encounter re-tasked empty 5-gallon paint containers around large construction sites.
There is a large body of prior art related to brush cleaning. One set of approaches is overnight brush soaking where the brushes are all held at a set, fixed height in a container. The bristles are not allowed to touch the bottom of the container, and the container is filled with the soaking solvent to an appropriate height. The following paragraphs discuss examples of this approach.
U.S. Pat. No. 1,979,241 by Albanese, et al. is for a Paintbrush Preserver having a special shaped container with a fixed-in-place, top edge of container supported brush rack. One disadvantage of this is the specialized shape of the necessary container. Another disadvantage, since the brush holding mechanism is fixed-in-place, is that the brushes must have similar dimensions and the solvent height must be adjusted to ensure that all of the bristles fully equally immersed.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,043,643 by Yenne is for a Paint Brush Keeper, one also having a special shaped container (termed a “keeper”) with an also fixed-in-place side-of-container supported brush rack. This approach suffers from the same disadvantages as Albanese, et al.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,278,650 by Drinkwater is for a Support For Brushes And Like Articles having a container with an internal fixed-in-place frame for holding articles. One disadvantage of this is the shape of the frame may limit the shape of the container. Another disadvantage is that the brushes must have similar dimensions and the solvent height must be adjusted to ensure that the bristles of all of the brushes are fully immersed.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,479,509 by Pichniarczyk is for a Paintbrush Holder having a container (also termed a “keeper”) with fixed-in-place side brush supports. One disadvantage of this is that the container must preferably be rectangular, e.g., a round container would be impractical. Another disadvantage is that the brushes must have similar dimensions, including each having a similarly located thru-hole (e.g., a hole to facilitate hanging the brush). Since it is common to use and to want to clean different sized brushes, and/or brushes from different manufactures, that may be dimensionally different or that may even lack a thru-hole in the brush handle, this may limit the utility of this approach. And another disadvantage, here as well, is that the solvent height must be adjusted to ensure that the bristles of all of the brushes are equally immersed.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,097,965 by Fher is for a Paint Brush Suspension Device having a container with a fixed-in-place top edge supported brush-clamping rack (termed “slats”). Unlike Pichniarczyk, the container here may be rectangular or round (e.g., a bucket or pail), but this approach otherwise generally suffers from the same disadvantages.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,829,603 by Martineau is for a Paint Utensil Cleaning Container having a container with a top edge supported cover with fixed height hooks for holding brushes. Here as well the brushes must have thru-holes to engage the hooks, and the disadvantages discussed above all generally apply.
Another set of approaches to prior art brush soaking has been to hold brushes at a limited variety of selectable heights in a container, and to fill the container to a necessary height with a soaking solvent. The following paragraphs discuss examples of this approach.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,286,790 by McBryar is for a Paint Brush Cleaning And Carrying Device having a container (e.g., a pail) with a top cover that includes a pins-in-holes mechanism to dangle brushes in a solvent. This approach is limited by the number of different heights of the holes, for instance, only sets of holes at two heights are shown. Another disadvantage is that the brushes require thru-holes as well as generally similar dimensions.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,607,752 by Sherrow is for a Paint Brush Cleaning Rack having a roughly rectangular footprint trough (i.e., a device that would have to go inside a container) with an external adjustable rack for holding brushes. Two approaches to clamping brush handles are taught. One uses straps of hook-and-loop fastener and the other uses a tie-wire arrangement. On their faces, these approach would appear to have brush height adjustability, however, the natures of these clamping mechanisms will tend to force brushes to similar heights because these approaches tend to grip the brushes all at the same, narrowest points on their handles.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,383,948 by Richardson is for a Paint Brush Cleaning Accessory having a container with a top edge supported cover that includes a spring clamping mechanism for holding brushes. On its face, this approach would also appear to have brush height adjustability, however, the spring based nature of the clamping mechanism here also tends to force brushes to the similar heights by clamping all at the narrowest points on their handles.
Yet another set of approaches to prior art brush soaking has been to hold brushes at widely selectable, different if necessary heights in a container, and to then fill the container to a necessary height with a soaking solvent. The following paragraphs discuss examples of this approach.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,310,533 by Lindell is for a Paint Brush Rack having a container with an external, adjustable side clamped rack for holding brushes. A disadvantage of this is that the container must preferably be rectangular and narrow, to efficiently use the volume of the container. Not using such a container can pose problems, since commonly used solvents are quite volatile and present sever fire hazard and explosion potential when solvent evaporates. Note, exacerbating this disadvantage in Lindell is that the rack and adjusting mechanism making fitting any kind of cover over the container to minimize evaporation quite difficult.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,472,001 by Buhoveckey is for a Paint Brush Protector having a container with an internal hooks-on-pulley (adjustable) mechanism for holding brushes. The container taught here is rectangular and has a tight fitting cover that is able to suppress solvent evaporation. However, the hooks-on-pulley mechanism is complicated. And here as well, the brushes used must have thru-holes, albeit, holes at different brush handle heights can be used.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,952,364 by Jacobson is for a Paint Brush Holder having a container with an internal bottom supported, center-rod adjustable-height rack of impaling pins for holding brushes. The container here appears to preferably be round, e.g., a bucket or pail, rather than rectangular. Again however, the brushes must have thru-holes where they are “impaled,” and here, holes at different brush handle heights cannot be used.
Finally, U.S. Pat. No. 5,097,967 by Sica is for a Paint Brush Cleaning, Drying, And Storage Container having a container with a top edge supported bar with adjustable height hooks for holding brushes. Here as well, the brushes must have thru-holes, albeit, ones at different brush handle heights can be used. The container can have a lid, but this cannot be fitted when the container is used for suspending brushes in a solvent. This lid can only be fitted on the container when it is used a storage chamber for brushes.
Accordingly, what are needed are improved methods and apparatus for paint brush soaking.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide an improved method and apparatus for paint brush soaking.
Briefly, one preferred embodiment of the present invention is an apparatus for soaking brushes in a solvent. The apparatus includes a body of a surface material and a fill material, wherein the body is sufficiently buoyant to float on the surface of the solvent even when the apparatus holds at least one of the brushes. The apparatus also has a number of holding stations that extend through the body of the apparatus. Each such holding station includes a holding mechanism that is suitable to retain one of the brushes in its respective holding station.
Briefly, another preferred embodiment of the present invention is a process for soaking brushes that each have bristles. A container is provided that contains a quantity of solvent which is suitable for soaking the bristles of the brushes. At least one of the brushes is placed in a holding station that extends through a body of an apparatus, wherein the apparatus is sufficiently buoyant to float on the surface of the solvent when the apparatus holds at least one of the brushes. At least one of the brushes is held as desired in such a holding station with a holding mechanism. And the apparatus is floated on the surface of the solvent in said container, thereby particularly soaking the bristles of all of the brushes that are being held in the apparatus and in the solvent.
These and other objects and advantages of the present invention will become clear to those skilled in the art in view of the description of the best presently known mode of carrying out the invention and the industrial applicability of the preferred embodiment as described herein and as illustrated in the figures of the drawings.
The purposes and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following detailed description in conjunction with the appended figures of drawings in which:
In the various figures of the drawings, like references are used to denote like or similar elements or steps.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention is an improved system for paint brush soaking. As illustrated in the various drawings herein, and particularly in the views of the drawings, embodiment of the invention are depicted by the general reference characters 10, 100.
In
While various embodiments have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and that the breadth and scope of the invention should not be limited by any of the above described exemplary embodiments, but should instead be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.