Method and apparatus for configuring the read-range of an RFID label or tag

Abstract
A RFID device with a surface treatment which interferes with the transmission of RF signals/data between the RFID device and the RF interrogator or reader. A surface treatment of either RF reflective or RF absorptive ink is deposited on a RFID device using an attenuation pattern to fine tune the read range of the RFID device thereby eliminating or reducing the occurrence of accidental or cross reads between nearby RF interrogators or readers.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to RFID labels and tags. Specifically, the present invention relates to controlled attenuation of the read range of an RFID label tags.


DESCRIPTION OF RELATED ART

RFID labels and tags are interrogated by a RF interrogator or reader. The RF interrogator or reader transmits a radio signal which is received by an RFID and is then reflected back to the reader/interrogator carrying the RFID's data content. The power used by the RF reader/interrogator is a factor in determining the range at which an RFID may be detected and/or interrogated. RF interrogator/reader power levels are subject to FCC regulations. Also, the power of the reader signal is limited by the antenna configuration selected and any shielding or interfering transmissions. Where multiple tags are present, within a read range, multiple reads may occur. Cross reads may occur between adjacent interrogators/readers. Physical barriers have been used to construct lanes through which RF labels pass one by one, for example parallel lanes each with its own reader/interrogator that is shielded from adjacent lanes. Shielding is expensive and difficult for the user to apply and if not applied correctly may result in lost or duplicate readings.


In many RFID applications shielding is impractical and/or undesirable. For example, where several printers with RFIDs are located adjacent to each other on a common table top it would be difficult to reliably interrogate only one of them if the read range of the RFID's used was large (for example, 18 inches or more).


To be economical, RFID transponders are generally engineered and bulk manufactured to satisfy the majority demand for RFID transponders, i.e. to have as large a read range with as low as a reader power as possible. Therefore, there is a need to quickly and economically attenuate the read range of RFID transponders on a group or individual basis, to satisfy special situations.


An object of the present invention is to provide an RFID label or tag with a fixable read range that does not require the use of external shielding.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An RFID device with a surface treatment which interferes with transmission of RF signals/data between the RFID device and the RF interrogator/reader. Different surface treatment embodiments may either absorb and/or reflect the RF signal. A distributed screen of reflective or absorptive ink of varying density enables individual or group fine tuning of an attenuation effect that regulates the read range of a RFID tag or label.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is schematic representation of one embodiment of a label with surface treatment in dot screen form.



FIG. 2 is another example of the embodiment of FIG. 1 having a higher dot density.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A RFID device with a surface treatment which interferes with the transmission of RF signals. Suitable surface treatments may either absorb and/or reflect RF signals.


Use of the attenuation patterns enables the fine-tuning of read ranges thereby eliminating or reducing the occurrence of accidental or cross reads between nearby RF interrogator/readers.


An RF interfering or absorbing surface treatment for a RFID device may be applied by hot stamping, printed inks using flexography, printed inks using rotogravure, ink deposition through the use of thermal transfer printing technology, printed inks using lithography, printed inks using silk screen printing technology or other printing methods.


Inks may be reflective, for example, metallic or may be RF signal absorbing. An example of a RF absorbing substance is water-laden nylon plastic film. A further deposition method is ion deposition printing. The interfering layer may be deposited at the time of printing thereby fixing the attenuation at a known level. Alternatively, the interference layer may be applied in an on demand fashion using ink jet and/or thermal transfer printing. In an on demand scenario, the end user may modify the amount of ink or pattern density applied between each individual label. Thus, the attenuation level may be varied to an individual requirement.


As shown in FIG. 1, the pattern of deposition may be in a screen format, for example, pattern of dots 10 across surface 20 of the label. Alternatively, the pattern of deposition may be in a grid format. Adjusting the thickness or diameter of the grid or dots 20 adjusts the attenuation effect from the interference or reflective layer. FIG. 2 represents another embodiment of FIG. 1 having a higher density of dots 10 on surface 20 of the label thereby creating a higher attenuation and lowering the read range of the RFID label which this pattern is applied upon.


The following patents/documents are all hereby incorporated by reference:


U.S. Pat. No. 5,850,181 “Method Of Transporting Radio Frequency Power To Energize RFID Transponders”.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,942,987 “Radio Frequency Identification System With Write Broadcast Capability”.


International Publication Number WO 00/05674 “Communicating With Radio Frequency Identification Tags Within Shaped Electromagnetic Fields”.

Claims
  • 1. A method for configuring the read range of an RFID device, comprising the steps of: obtaining a RFID device;selecting a pattern density prior to depositing the interfering layer;depositing an interfering layer in an attenuation pattern upon said RFID device; andadjusting the attenuation level of the RFID device;wherein said pattern is a plurality of spaced apart dots.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein said interfering layer is deposited by a printer using a print technology selected from the group consisting of hot stamping, flexography, rotogravure, thermal transfer printing, lithography silk screen printing, ion deposition printing, and ink jet printing.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the interfering layer comprises a RF signal reflective ink.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the interfering layer comprises RF signal absorptive ink.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein said RFID device is unprinted and said interfering layer is deposited at the time of printing said RFID device.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein said RFID device is preprinted and the interfering layer is deposited on the preprinted RFID device.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of selecting a pattern thickness prior to depositing the interfering layer.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein said RFID device is a label.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein said RFID device is a tag.
  • 10. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of selecting a pattern thickness prior to depositing the interfering layer.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein said pattern is a grid.
  • 12. A read-range attenuated RFID device, comprising: a RFID device; andan interfering layer deposited in an attenuation pattern upon said RFID device; said
  • 13. The read range attenuated RFID device of claim 12, wherein said interfering layer comprises RF signal reflective ink.
  • 14. The read range attenuated RFID device of claim 13, wherein said RFID device is a RFID label.
  • 15. The read range attenuated RFID device of claim 13, wherein said RFID device is a RFID tag.
  • 16. The read range attenuated RFID device of claim 12, wherein said interfering layer comprises RF signal absorptive ink.
  • 17. The read range attenuated RFID device of claim 16, wherein said RFID device is a RFID label.
  • 18. The read range attenuated RFID device of claim 16, wherein said RFID device is a RFID tag.
  • 19. The read range attenuated RFID device of claim 12, wherein said RFID device is a RFID label.
  • 20. The read range attenuated RFID device of claim 12, wherein said RFID device is a RFID tag.
  • 21. The read range attenuated RFID device of claim 12, wherein said pattern is a grid.
Parent Case Info

This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application No. 60/305,308 filed Jul. 12, 2001.

US Referenced Citations (17)
Number Name Date Kind
4786915 Cartwright et al. Nov 1988 A
5557279 D'Hont Sep 1996 A
5642118 Grannemann Jun 1997 A
5767789 Afzali-Ardakani et al. Jun 1998 A
5850181 Heinrich et al. Dec 1998 A
5862101 Haas et al. Jan 1999 A
5920290 McDonough et al. Jul 1999 A
5939984 Brady et al. Aug 1999 A
5942987 Heinrich et al. Aug 1999 A
5972156 Brady et al. Oct 1999 A
5995006 Walsh Nov 1999 A
6121544 Petsinger Sep 2000 A
6127938 Friedman Oct 2000 A
6144345 Kuether Nov 2000 A
6359588 Kuntzsch Mar 2002 B1
6424315 Glenn et al. Jul 2002 B1
6624752 Klitsgaard et al. Sep 2003 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
WO 0005674 Feb 2000 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20030156032 A1 Aug 2003 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60305308 Jul 2001 US