This application claims the benefit, under 35 U.S.C. §119 of European Patent Application 06/300741.3, filed Jun. 30, 2006.
The present invention relates to a method for driving a display device including the steps of providing a digital value as video level for each pixel or cell of a line of the display device, providing at least one reference driving signal and generating a driving signal on the basis of the digital value and the at least one reference driving signal. Furthermore, the present invention relates to a respective apparatus for driving a display device.
The structure of an active matrix OLED (organic light emitting display) or AMOLED is well known. According to
Actually, there are two ways for driving the OLED cells 2. In a first way, each digital video information sent by the digital processing unit 5 is converted by the column drivers 4 into a current whose amplitude is directly proportional to the video level. This current is provided to the appropriate cell 2 of the matrix 1. In a second way, the digital video information sent by the digital processing unit 5 is converted by the column drivers 4 into a voltage whose amplitude is proportional to the square of the video level. This current or voltage is provided to the appropriate cell 2 of the matrix 1.
However, in principle, an OLED is current driven so that each voltage based driven system is based on a voltage to current converter to achieve appropriate cell lighting.
From the above, it can be deduced that the row driver 3 has a quite simple function since it only has to apply a selection line by line. It is more or less a shift register. The column driver 4 represents the real active part and can be considered as a high level digital to analog converter.
The displaying of a video information with such a structure of AMOLED is symbolized in
In order to illustrate this concept, the example of a voltage driven circuitry will be taken in the rest of this document. The driver of this example uses 8 reference voltages named V0 to V7 and the video levels are built as explained in the following table 1.
Table 1 illustrates the obtained output voltages (gray scale voltage levels) from the voltage driver for various input video levels. For instance, the reference voltages of Table 2 are used.
Then, the grayscale voltage levels of following Table 3 depending on video input levels according to Table 1 and Table 2 are obtained:
As can be seen in the previous paragraph current AMOLED concepts are capable of delivering 8-bit gradation per color. This can be further enhanced by using more advanced solutions like improvements on analog sub-fields.
In any case, there will be the need in the future of displays having more video-depth. This trend can be seen in the development of transmission standards based on 10-bit color channels. At the same time, various display manufacturers like PDP makers are claiming providing displays with more than 10-bit color-depth.
The object of the present invention is to provide a method and an apparatus capable of increasing the video depth depending on the video content of each line in order to provide a maximum of color gradation for a given scene. I.e., a line content picture enhancement shall be provided.
According to the present invention this object is solved by a method for driving a display device including the steps of
Furthermore, there is provided an apparatus for driving a display device including
Preferably, the display device is an AMOLED or a LCD. Especially, these display concepts can be improved by the above described method or apparatus.
The reference driving signal may be a reference voltage or a reference current. Each of these driving systems can profit from the present invention.
According to a further preferred embodiment, a maximum digital value of at least the part of a line is determined and when adjusting the reference driving signals, they are assigned to digital values between a minimum digital value, which is to be determined or is predetermined, and a maximum digital value. By this way, the whole range of gray scale levels is used for the video input of one line.
A further improvement can be obtained when determining a histogram of the digital values of at least the part of a line and adjusting the reference driving signals on the basis of this histogram. This results in an enhanced picture line-dependent gradation.
Exemplary embodiments of the invention are illustrated in the drawings showing in:
The main idea behind the inventive concept is based on the fact that in a video scene, the whole video dynamic range is not used on a large part of the scene.
Together,
On the other hand, it is important to notice that in dark scenes the eye is much more sensitive to picture gradation. Therefore, an optimization of picture gradation for dark scenes while keeping luminous scenes quite stable would have a positive effect on the global picture quality.
As already explained, the main idea is to perform a picture line-dependent gradation by optimizing the driver reference signaling (voltage or current) to the maximum of video levels available in a line. For instance, in the sequence “Zorro” of
More generally, a complex function can be applied to the reference signaling under the form Sn=f(Srefn;MAX(Line)) where MAX(Line) represents the maximum video level used for a given line and Srefn the reference signaling (either voltage or current). This function can be implemented by means of LUT or embedded mathematical functions.
In the example shown in Table 4, all voltages have been modified using the same transformation
where Vref0 represents the threshold voltage. This is the simplest transformation that can be used for voltage driven system since the gamma function is applied inside the OLED according to the proportionality L(x,y)∝I(x;y)=k×(V(x;y)−Vth)2 where L(x;y) represents the luminance of the pixel located at (x;y) and I(x,y) the current provided to this pixel. Indeed in a first approach, it is intended to have L(x,y)∝k×(Video(x;y))2 if one could afford to have a gamma of 2 instead of a gamma of 2.2. In this case it is easy to understand that if the Video level dynamic is modified by a factor p, then it is sufficient to modify the voltages by the same factor. In all other cases, like gamma different from 2 or current driven systems where no inherent gamma is existing a more complex transformation is mandatory for the voltage adjustment since the voltages are no more proportional to the video values.
For instance, in a current driven system there is L(x,y)=k×(I−Ith) but ideally it should be L(x,y)∝(Video(x;y))2.2. Then, a gamma transfer function of 2.2 is needed between the video level and the applied intensity. So if the video level is divided by 2, the provided intensity must be divided by 4.59 since
The same is true for a voltage driven system and a real gamma of 2.2 is aimed. In this case, there is a transformation of 1.1 between video and voltages under the form V(x,y)∝Video(x;y)1.1 that is needed in order to have finally:
L(x,y)∝(V(x;y)−Vth)2∝(Video(x;y)1.1)2=Video(x;y)2.2
In that case, if the maximum video is divided by 2, the voltages must be divided by 21.1=2.14.
Such a transformation is quite complex and it is often difficult to be computed on-chip. Therefore, the ideal solution is to use a LUT containing 255 inputs, each one dedicated to a maximum value. The output can be on 8-bit or more in order to define the adjusting factor. Ideally, 10-bit is mandatory.
Reverting to the example of the current driven system, if the maximum amplitude per line is 128, the output of the 256×10-bit LUT will be 225. Then the voltages will be multiplied by 225 and divided by 1024 to obtain the factor 4.59. Here, it is very difficult to perform a division in hardware excepted if a 2m divider is used that is simply a shift register. Indeed, dividing by 1024 corresponds to a shift by 10. Therefore the multiplication coefficients are always based on a 2p divider. Some further examples for such a LUT are given in Table 5 below.
In parallel to that the video levels must be modified accordingly to benefit of the enhanced gradation. In that case
applies. Here also the transformation should be better implemented via a LUT with 256 inputs corresponding to the 256 possible values for MAX(Line) and an output corresponding to a coefficient on 10-bit or more.
In the previous paragraph, a simple solution is shown based on adjusting the reference signaling range to the maximal available video level in a line. A more advanced concept would lead in an optimization of the gradation between the more used video levels. Such enhanced concept of picture line-dependent gradation will be based on a histogram analysis performed on each line. The example of the sequence “Zorro” and the line 303 shall be taken from such histogram analysis with the previous approach for voltage adjustment.
Now, for all examples simply a gamma of 2 shall be used. For this case, the new correspondence between video levels and voltages is shown in Table 6.
As it can be seen on
Therefore, according to a further embodiment there is provided an adaptation of the video transformation and voltage levels to adjust finest gradation where the maximum of video levels are distributed. In order to implement this concept, a first table is needed representing the driver behavior, which means the number of levels represented by each voltage. This is illustrated in Table 7 for the example of Table 1. A full voltage reference table for the driver chosen as example is given in Annex 1.
It is generally known that a histogram of a picture represents, for each video level, the number of times this level is used. Such a histogram table is computed for a given line and described as HISTO[n], where n represents the possible video levels used for the input picture (at least 8 bit or more). In order to simplify the exposition, an input signal limited to 8-bit (256 discrete levels) will be taken.
Now, the main idea is based on a computation of video level limits for each voltage. Such a limit represents the ideal number of pixels that should be coded inside each voltage. Ideally, this will be based on a percentage of the number of pixels per line. For example, for a display with 720 pixels per lines (720×3 cells) the voltage V5 should be used to encode at least 720×3×16/255=135 cells. Based on this assumption the following Table 8 is obtained.
The limits of this table are stored in an array LIMIT[k] with LIMIT[0]=0, LIMIT[1]=127, . . . , LIMIT[7]=271.
Now, for each line following exemplary computation is performed:
From this computation a table of video levels LEVEL_SELECT[k] results that represents the video level at the transition between the voltage k-1 and k. The results for line 303 are given in Table 9 below, which is based on Annex 2.
Table 9 shows that:
The result is illustrated in
As soon as the optimal voltages repartition for a given line is defined, two types of adjustment should be performed to display a correct but improved picture:
With the table transition being an accumulation of the LIMIT[k] values so that
Consequently, one gets TRANS[0]=0, TRANS[1]=16, TRANS[1]=32, TRANS[2]=64, TRANS[3]=128, TRANS[4]=192, TRANS[5]=224 and TRANS[6]=256.
The results of the previous computations are given in Tables 10 and 11 below:
As already explained the complex computations are most of the cases replaced by LUTs. In the situation of the video level adjustment described as:
A 8-bit LUT takes as input the value LEVEL_SELECT[n]−LEVEL_SELECT[n−1] and delivers a certain factor (more than 10-bit resolution is mandatory) to perform the division. The rest are only multiplications and additions that can be done in real time without any problem.
As already said, the example is related to a simple gamma of 2 in a voltage driven system to simplify the exposition. For a different gamma or for a current driven system, the computations must be adjusted accordingly by using adapted LUTs.
After the analysis and the delay of the line, the video levels are adjusted in a video adjustment block 13. Here the new video levels Lout are generated on the basis of the original video levels Lin. The video signal with the new video levels is input to a standard OLED processing unit. 14. Column driving data are output from this unit 14 and transmitted to a column driver 15 of an AMOLED display 16. Furthermore, the standard OLED processing unit 14 produces row driving data for controlling the row driver 17 of the AMOLED display 16.
Analysis data of line analysis block 12 are further provided to a voltage adjustment block 18 for adjusting a reference voltages being provided by a reference signaling unit 19. This reference signaling unit 19 delivers reference voltages Vrefn to the column driver 15. For adjusting the reference voltages, the voltage adjustment block 18 is synchronized onto the row driving unit 17.
The control data for programming the specific reference voltages are forwarded from voltage adjustment block 18 to the reference signaling unit 19. The adaptation of the voltages as well as that of the video levels is done on the basis of LUTs and computation.
In case of a current driven system, the reference signaling is performed with currents and block 18 takes care of a current adjustment.
The invention is not limited to the AMOLED screens but can also be applied to LCD displays or other displays using reference signaling means.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
06300741 | Jun 2006 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6023259 | Howard et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6535224 | Kuriyama et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
20020011979 | Nitta et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020126139 | Kuriyama et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030042048 | Hughes et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030122743 | Suzuki | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030234392 | Kung et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040051685 | Chung et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040100399 | Sun | May 2004 | A1 |
20050057455 | Peng | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050104842 | Baik | May 2005 | A1 |
20050134534 | Yamada et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060022915 | Weitbruch et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060066756 | Yamagishi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20080316163 | Van Den Homberg et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1158779 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1227467 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1469449 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1622119 | Feb 2006 | EP |
2388236 | Nov 2003 | GB |
H06230760 | Aug 1994 | JP |
2000242210 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2002251171 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003162253 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2004037828 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004220049 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2004333570 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2004341267 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2004354635 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2004361489 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005148710 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005260329 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006048040 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006101421 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2007199375 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2007199376 | Aug 2007 | JP |
WO2004088568 | Oct 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report dated Oct. 2, 2006. |
Landsburg et al, “Flat screen displays using OLEDs (organic light emitting diodes),” Elektronik Praxis, No. 1, pp. 50-54, Jan. 15, 2002. (Abstract). |
Lin, et al., “Current driving pixel circuitries for active matrix organic light emitting diode display,” 2002 SID Int'l Symposium. Digest of Technical Papers, vol. 33, pt. vol. 1, pp. 610-613, San Jose, May 2002. |
Lin, et al., “Improvement of brightness uniformity by AC driving scheme for AMOLED display,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 25, No. 11, pp. 728-730, Nov. 2004. |
Sempel, et al., “Design aspects of low power polymer/OLED passive-matrix displays,” Organic Electronics, vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 89-92, Jun. 2002. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080055213 A1 | Mar 2008 | US |