The invention relates generally to radio communications and relates more particularly to communications between a host (base station) and myriad passive or active radio tags.
It is not easy to create a system that permits a base station to communicate individually with each of myriad radio tags in an area, particularly where the tags are required to be limited in cost and size and are required to function for a long time without a problem of a battery running down. Consider the particular case where the reading of the tags is intended to be an “area read”, meaning that the tags are distributed about an area and the base station is at some distance from many of the tags and the operator of the system does not have the luxury of being able to assume that a reader is moved to each of the tags seriatim for individual close-up reading.
Nearly all RF-ID tag systems in the prior art are systems that designed on the assumption that when a reader reads a tag, the reader and tag are close together or (in some systems) the reader has a high-gain antenna pointed directly at the tag and at no other tag. In this way, the tag is bathed in RF energy and responds specifically because it notices that it has been bathed in RF energy.
With such tags it is impossible to do an “area read”. Stated differently, if some antenna were positioned so as to be RF-linked with myriad tags, then bathing several or most of the tags in RF energy would simply yield an unintelligible burst of radio clutter. With such a system, the reader would receive confused and overlapping responses if the reader were juxtaposed or positioned so that more than one tag is in its reading path.
One design decision that can help with making “area reads” possible is the use of lower radio frequencies rather than higher frequencies. This is not easy to do but approaches such as those described in U.S. application Ser. No. 11/276,096 filed Feb. 14, 2006, incorporated herein by reference, can make it possible to use lower frequencies.
Another design decision that can help with making “area reads” possible is the use of tags that do not simply respond each time they are bathed in RF energy, but that instead respond only after certain conditions are satisfied, such as receipt of a message with particular content or development of a predefined internal state. Such tags are described in U.S. application Ser. No. 11/419,750 filed May 22, 2006, incorporated herein by reference. With such a system there may be a power/clock RF field that provides power and clock information to the myriad tags in the reading area, and then a different data RF field (typically at a higher frequency than the power/clock field) permits messages to be passed to the tags and permits tags to respond. Each tag typically has two distinct antennas, one for for receiving the power/clock and another for sending and receiving data messages. The base station may likewise have two distinct antennas, or may employ a single antenna directed to both purposes.
But even with these design decisions, a system designer cannot do as much as one would like to do in terms of area reads over substantial areas and in terms of large numbers of tags that are in varied orientations relative to the base station and that may have been “detuned” due to proximity to metal or liquids or other materials that distort electrical or magnetic fields. One would like to be able to pick up a particular tag to the exclusion of others. One would like to be able to pick up all or nearly all of the tags in an area, rather than only being able to pick up some of them.
It would thus be very desirable if additional design elements could be devised that would help to facilitate these aspects of performing “area reads”.
An area-reading antenna (in RF linkage with myriad RF tags) is dynamically tuned. It may be dynamically tuned as to its transmission of a power/clock field, or dynamically tuned as to its transmission of a data signal, or dynamically tuned as to its reception of a data signal, or some combination of all three. In this way, a base station has an improved ability to communicate with a greater fraction of the RF tags within its reading area, despite detuning of individual tags due to proximity of detuning influences such as metal or liquids.
The invention will be described with respect to a drawing in several figures:
It should be appreciated that the RF design environment of a system such as that shown in
In many design environments the designer is able to assume that the devices being communicated with are stationary. No such luxury is available to the designer of such an area-read system.
In many design environments the designer is able to assume that the devices being communicated with have plenty of power (e.g. cell phones with rechargeable batteries). No such luxury is available to the designer of such an area-read system.
In some design environments the designer is able to assume that the base station (and/or its antenna) is moved from place to place, being in close proximity with only one device at a time. No such luxury is available to the designer of such an area-read system.
In some design environments the designer is able to assume that the base station antenna is a high-gain antenna, pointing to only one device at a time (for example a highway toll collection system with a directional antenna pointed directly at a single lane of traffic). No such luxury is available to the designer of such an area-read system.
In accordance with the invention, an antenna tuning system is provided. In this exemplary embodiment variable capacitors 13, 14 are provided in series with and in parallel with the antenna 11, and are controlled by a control means 15. The control means 15 acts to match the antenna 11 to the radio transmitter and receiver of the base station 10.
At first glance one might think of the system of
As described in the above-mentioned U.S. application No. 60/596,684 filed Oct. 12, 2005, the tags 24a, 24b, 24c, and 24d may be tags each of which has two antennas, and each of which lacks any other power source, one antenna receiving power/clock and the other antenna receiving and transmitting data. For the base station to communicate with such tags, it must actuate each of the antennas 20, 21 from time to time. On the other hand, as described in the above-mentioned U.S. application No. 60/596,684 filed Oct. 12, 2005, one or more of the tags 24a, 24b, 24c, and 24d may be a tag having a battery and not necessarily requiring external power. Thus one or more of the tags may be independently powered, for example by a battery.
An exemplary base station according to the invention is shown in several parts—a microcontroller (
External connectors. In this exemplary embodiment there are several external connectors. These are:
In an exemplary embodiment one circuit board carries the circuitry for
Receive Data Path.
A received RF signal is received on a loop antenna, omitted for clarity in
The received signal is matched (tuned) by capacitors selected by relays 34, 35, 36, 37, 38. These capacitors are connected, or are not connected, in parallel, so as to provide an optimal standing-wave ratio between the antenna and the transmitter (
In
A first integrator receiving the analog path 51 and feeds output line 53. A second integrator receives the analog patch 52 and feeds output line 54. Discharge line 57 determines whether the capacitors of the integrators are discharged (reset). Output lines 53, 54 pass to
Transmit Data Path.
External equipment, omitted for clarity in
In use, the base station described here can interact with myriad RF tags, carrying out a method such as the following:
The first and second frequencies may both be below 450 kHz.
The tuning of the antenna yielding the response from the at least a second one of the RF tags may be based upon stored information regarding tuning that previously yielded a response from the at least a second one of the RF tags.
The method may be such that the first transmitting also does not receive a response from at least a third one of the RF tags, and may be such that the second transmitting also does not receive a response from the at least a third one of the RF tags, in which case the following may be carried out:
Yet another method that may be carried out is:
The base station described here can interact with myriad self-powered RF tags, carrying out a method such as the following:
It will be appreciated that this base station is able to carry out its activities in a way that is optimized for a particular tag, despite its possible detuning due to nearby metal objects or other interfering conditions, based for example upon a stored record of the circumstances that permitted successful communication with that particular tag in the past.
The base station is able to select among several antennas, each of which may be oriented differently in three-dimensional space, and one of which may couple more effectively with a particular RF tag than the others of the antennas.
The base station is able to carry out impedence matching (by means of the antenna tuner of
The base station is able to shift its transmit and receive frequencies dynamically, so as to pick up RF tags that have been detuned as mentioned above.
Those skilled in the art will have no difficulty devising countless obvious variations and improvements upon the invention as described here in connection with a particular embodiment, which variations and improvements are intended to be encompassed within the claims which follow.
This application claims priority from U.S. application Ser. No. 11/459,647 filed Jul. 25, 2006 (now abandoned), which claims priority from U.S. application No. 60/806,520 filed Jul. 3, 2006, which applications are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. This application claims priority from U.S. application No. 60/596,684 filed Oct. 12, 2005, which application is hereby incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4821291 | Stevens et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
5300875 | Tuttle | Apr 1994 | A |
5491715 | Flaxl | Feb 1996 | A |
5532686 | Urbas et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
6070803 | Stobbe | Jun 2000 | A |
6317027 | Watkins | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6525649 | Ueda et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070120649 A1 | May 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60596684 | Oct 2005 | US | |
60806520 | Jul 2006 | US | |
60720074 | Sep 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11459647 | Jul 2006 | US |
Child | 11462981 | US |