Systems and methods for generating depth maps for images have suffered from lack of precision and requirements for great computing resources. Additionally, specialized hardware is often required in order to generate such a depth map. Imprecision in generation of such a depth map may result in poor resolution of acquired images and difficulty in identifying precise locations of objects within those depth maps. Without such precise identification of these locations, later processing of these images and objects may result in a reduced ability to rely on these locations and objects for additional processing.
Therefore, it would be desirable to present a method and apparatus that overcomes the drawbacks of the prior art.
In accordance with various embodiments of the present invention, a method and apparatus is provided for stabilizing segmentation and depth calculations. The inventors of the present invention have presented, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/025,038, titled “Method and Apparatus for Performing Segmentation of an Image”, filed Feb. 10, 2011 to El Dokor et al., Ser. No. 13/025,055, titled “Method and Apparatus for Disparity Computation in Stereo Images, filed February 10 to El Dokor et al., and Ser. No. 13/025,070, titled “Method and Apparatus for Determining Disparity of Texture”, filed Feb. 10, 2011 to El Dokor et al., the entire contents of each of these applications being incorporated herein by reference, a case for describing various types of segments, labeled as stable or unstable segments, used for developing a disparity map. This is described as being accomplished by matching such segments with their appropriate counterparts between the two images in a stereo image sequence. Building on the implementation described in the above-mentioned applications, in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention, a series of criteria is presented for updating the various segments, specifically with the goal of efficient and accurate depth map updating.
As is described in the '038, '055 and '070 applications, it is meaningful to look only at one or more changes associated with a given stereo image sequence to produce a subsequent depth map and not the entire image. Thus, rather than recomputing an entirely new depth map for each pair of stereo images over time, only changes between consecutive frames are computed and integrated into one composite depth map. This process is not only computationally more efficient than recomputing the complete depth map for each stereo frame pair, it is also more accurate for matching, since only regions with significant changes are being matched in any given frame or sequence of frames. This is an altogether novel approach to computational stereo as previous attempts have been faced with a significant amount of computational complexity, problems with limiting a candidate space of depth calculations, and a nebulous set of features at best to extract from, without these features being robust to significant changes in the scene's quality or even overall color scheme.
In accordance with various embodiments of the present invention, a framework with which such an approach can be accomplished is provided, defining various types of regions and segments that are associated with such an approach. Also presented are other relevant aspects and features to develop a set of factors that can improve the accuracy of segmentation and the accuracy of the depth map itself, by presenting a shallow-depth of field concept with two different realizations.
Still other objects and advantages of the invention will in part be obvious and will in part be apparent from the specification and drawings.
The invention accordingly comprises the several steps and the relation of one or more of such steps with respect to each of the other steps, and the apparatus embodying features of construction, combinations of elements and arrangement of parts that are adapted to affect such steps, all as exemplified in the following detailed disclosure, and the scope of the invention will be indicated in the claims.
For a more complete understanding of the invention, reference is made to the following description and accompanying drawings, in which:
One or more embodiments of the invention will now be described, making reference to the following drawings in which like reference numbers indicate like structure between the drawings.
An image scene may be organized into a series of homogenized segments, or “regions”, defined by their color, texture properties or other relevant properties. Each of these regions defines one or more segments in the image. The challenge for creating a disparity map (and hence, a depth map) from such segments lies in matching these segments against their correct counterparts in a secondary image (the other image in, for example, a stereo pair of images). To accomplish that, an even bigger challenge is associated with segmenting these images into segments of meaningful context. The above-mentioned '038, '055 and '070 applications present a more detailed discussion of the different clustering techniques that may be associated with defining segments, and associated matching techniques. One of the most important assumptions that was made in these applications, and that carries through to the present invention, is that changes in the image, in general, are very gradual. While there are regions of abrupt changes, they are few in relationship to an entire image sequence. Most regions exhibit this well-behaved and gradual change. Such gradual transition allows exploitation of redundancy of data between frames to:
Given these two general observations, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, a more coherent approach to disparity-based depth compute is provided, in which the depth map is iteratively improved through segmentation, followed by depth computation. Temporal and spatial stability criteria of various segments become crucial to determining disparity updates, and hence depth map updates, since absent of such criteria a temporal-based approach can not be implemented, and the scene's temporal redundancy can not be successfully exploited. Tracking across such a broad range of features ensures that changes in the image are correctly accounted for and integrated into the depth map.
This novel approach to segmentation/depth map calculation allows a highly efficient and accurate depth map to be produced and enables a real-time implementation that can be embedded on smaller platforms, including (system-on-a-chip) SoC platforms, where an existing embedded GPGPU can provide the parallel computation that is preferred to implement this approach.
Given the importance of stability criteria, embodiments of the present invention define various segment types that enhance scene understanding through such criteria, and exploit such criteria to understand scene changes across frames and within the same frame. Thus, as is shown in
Table 1, below, depicts the various segment types, and a description of characteristics of that segment type. As can be seen, stable segments have little or no change, while partially stable segments have a small amount of change, but the segment is still considered generally stable. Mesostable segments are transitioning from an unstable classification to a more stable classification, while an unstable segment has enough motion that it may have to be resegmented, and may be a result of any of the other classifications. Other/background segments include all other pixels that cannot be placed into a segment with other pixels.
As is noted, pixels therefore may move between classifications based upon change associated therewith. A state diagram depicting movement paths between various classifications is shown at
Therefore, pixels may be classified into one of the two general classes: residual pixels, i.e. pixels that have changed in the image as determined in accordance with one or more intra-frame metrics, and non-residual pixels representing pixels that have not changed, also based on such metrics. Segments undertake the overall process described earlier: they may be first created, by identifying pixels that are residual. They then may migrate to states of mesostability or stability, depending on the associated criteria. A depth may be computed and associated with such segments, and then a second depth-based segmentation step may be implemented. By default, any pixel or group of pixels that have not been assigned to stable or mesostable, are assigned to unstable.
Organizing a scene into various segments is preferably predicated upon the concept that neighboring pixels generally exhibit similar behavior, and hence generally do belong to the same segment. This behavior may involve characteristics of motion, color changes, texture features, or any combination of features. The exception to this notion lies at object boundaries and/or at depth discontinuities.
Once objects, or segments, are identified as stable or unstable, the natural progression is towards cluster numbers that stabilize the process over time, so that only changes in images are accounted for. This general theoretical approach, though very different in its details, is widely exploited in video encoding (Wiegand, Sullivan, Bjøntegaard, & Luthra, 2003) at a much more basic level, in which segments are considered for dominant features for texture or motion-based coding. The most substantial contribution and difference here is the explicit definition of different segment types, their lifecycle, and the associated pixel states, aspects of the work that are not present in video coding. Additionally video coding techniques do not attempt to glean or extract depth or even associated segments with various depths. The invention as set forth in one or more embodiments of the present invention also exploits advances in GPU computing to parallelize the process of clustering and scene organization.
The utilization of image segments for calculating depth and iteratively improving segmentation through gleaning scene queues of perceptual relevance allows disparity computation to take place in a very efficient manner. A feature, such as motion, that can be a very dominant feature in scene analysis, can be extracted from mesostable segments, i.e., segments transitioning between an unstable state and a stable one. Local changes in the image that are associated with motion may be clustered and tracked through residual segmentation first. Disparities may then be computed by only matching such segments with ones that represent similar mesostable changes and ignoring all other pixels. Hence, the search space that is associated with disparity matching is greatly reduced, and matching accuracy is enhanced. Once depth is computed, a new depth map can be reclustered based on combining stable segments with recently depth-computed mesostable segments.
Similar to the process noted above, one or more color spaces may be combined together to produce meaningful segmentation processing. In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, not only are residual segments computed, but a scene may be broken down into two or more orthogonal scenes: one of high Chroma (color world) and one of low Chroma (gray world). The two scenes may then be segmented, and then the steps set forth in
Once the gray world depth map has been created, it can be easily combined and fused with the high-Chroma depth map, presented earlier.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, based upon the determination that video sequences are well behaved, then one may make the additional useful assumption that any associated segmentation map and any additional subsequently computed maps are likely also well behaved. Thus, even when confronted with a given partially stable segment whose disparity is to be recalculated, a well-behaved segment allows the assumption that a newly computed disparity for that segment is likely in the neighborhood of the old one from the previous frame, as the segment may be tracked across one or more frames. As such, it is possible to define two second level types of stability for a particular partially stable segment:
All pixels in corresponding images are preferably marked with their respective states. This is particularly important since matching relevant pixels with each other across frames requires a mechanism with which such pixels are correctly marked. From an implementation perspective, marking pixels during disparity decomposition in a manner as described in the above-mentioned '038, '055 and '070 applications, while matching, is an effective interpretation of this approach. Marked out pixels cannot contribute to further matching during the disparity decomposition step, and so false positives are reduced. Disparity decomposition, as described in the above-mentioned '038, '055 and '070 applications can be conducted left-to-right or right-to-left, and pixels with existing and accurate disparity can be marked out to reduce the search space that is associated with the disparity decomposition.
Block-Based GPU Clustering and Implementation on a Discrete GPU or an Integrated GPU of a System on a Chip
GPU technology allows for launching of multiple simultaneously processed threads for processing video images. The threads are preferably managed by a thread scheduler, each thread adapted to work on one or more pixels in an image. See (NVIDIA: CUDA compute unified device architecture, prog. guide, version 1.1, 2007) for more details. Groups of threads may be combined to process pixel blocks with having rectangular or other desirable dimensions. One or more methods for clustering of such pixels employing GPU-based implementations are described in the above-mentioned '038, '055 and '070 applications, in which block based statistics are first computed and then combined across blocks. As a direct result of this process, localized statistics representing intermediate results of various clusters at GPU block-level (from the GPU architecture) are available. Additionally, one or more global statistics constituting localized combinations of all the localized block-level statistics are also available. This means that for any given cluster, both localized as well as global statistical information is available for segmentation. This same paradigm would also apply to GPUs that are integrated onboard an SoC, like ARM's MALI or Imgtec's SGX PowerVR or any other GPU or GPU IP representation involving the utilization of SIMD architectures and calling functions.
When performing segmentation of an image, one of the biggest challenges involves finding the correct optimizations of local and global metrics that are associated with a given segment or cluster to allow for appropriate clustering of different segments in an image. For any given residual segment, clustering an existing stable segment not only requires global statistics, but also local ones. This is especially true for larger segments, in which global statistics may vary drastically from local ones, especially in the presence of a color or texture gradient. Two segments may have very different overall global statistics, but they may also have local statistics that are well suited to allow them to cluster together. Utilizing the GPU's intrinsic properties involving launching blocks of threads to operate on contiguous data, adjacent blocks that belong to two different clusters may be very similar and can be used to combine clusters together. This can also apply for tracking changes in blocks of data that are associated with larger segments. Utilizing block-based statistics allows segments to remain relatively stable as they transition between states, and as they temporally progress and evolve through an image sequence.
The thread scheduler can also be modified through configuration settings, to account for such a computational stereo approach.
The inventive approach specifically utilizes the GPU's thread scheduler as a means of imposing local metrics on image segmentation. As a result, local metrics become an intrinsic consequence of the GPU architecture, provided appropriate implementation in either software or hardware or both.
A GPU-based architecture can then be designed to optimize the utilization of the GPU's thread scheduler for segmentation. Arithmetic Logic Units (ALUs) can be used to process adjacent pixels in an image, local changes being associated with thread blocks and global changes being represented as combinations of such local changes. Merging at the block level before merging on the grid level, i.e. entire image, allows all threads in a block to write to fewer locations, mitigating many atomic operations. Atomic operations are a common bottleneck associated with computer vision algorithms being implemented on GPGPU architectures.
Shallow Depth of Field
Depth of field is that part of the field of view of a camera that contains the sharpest edges (the amount of sharpness in the scene), see (Peterson, 2010). Peterson defines three major factors contributing to depth of field:
A shallow depth of field has the effect of blurring objects outside regions with high sharpness (i.e. outside regions in focus). The blurring effect can aid in identifying background objects. Features associated with scale and frequency can be exploited to mitigate the background objects, reduce scene clutter, and improve depth computation accuracy.
Various embodiments of the present invention include at least two approaches to mitigate excessive FLOPs computation based on exploiting properties of the field-of-view through blurring the background with a shallow depth of field. In doing so, the background selectively stands in contrast to the foreground, and can be removed through the utilization of large-scale low pass filtering kernels or selective wavelet-based filtering, since background blurriness becomes a salient feature of the scene and can be exploited. During residual segmentation, having a shallow depth of field enhances matching foreground-segmented objects, since erroneous background objects are minimized with a more blurred background model. There are many techniques to highlight the fundamental differences between the foreground and background in a scene with a shallow depth of field. Techniques like PCA, SVM, or training a Neural Network can be used to detect such regions' features. There also exists prior work in the literature on sharpness metrics that can also be applied in this case to enhance foreground-background discriminability. The two methods for reducing such depth of field will now be described.
Space-Frequency Feature Extraction for Segment Matching
One inventive approach for matching segments or image regions is to utilize space-frequency features utilizing tools such as wavelet decomposition. Therefore, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the following process may be employed. First, a candidate segment is preferably defined, {tilde over (s)}R(x,y), whose disparity is being evaluated. An operator F{ψR(x,y)} is also defined such that ψR(x,y) is a basis function. A space-frequency decomposition may therefore be defined as:
R{tilde over (s)}
As noted above, such features allow a background model to be extracted and utilized in matching and segmentation. With a background that is relatively uniform and smooth, frequency-space decomposition can then be applied to the scene, with a background model whose main features constitute spatially larger scales as well as lower frequencies. The task of matching foreground objects with their correct disparities then becomes simpler, given the relative consistency of background features.
Utilizing Micro-Electronic Machines (MEMS) for Adaptive Focus/Defocus and Aperture Size Modification
An alternative approach to enabling background defocus, or blurring is through changing the background model via varying the focal length by mounting the lens on microelectronic machines (MEMs). Therefore, as is shown in
As a result, another approach can be suggested in which an artificial intelligence system, such as the one that has been described in the above-mentioned '038, '055 and '070 applications, can be used to evaluate the quality of segmentation. The AI can then interactively vary the image by enhancing segmentation through a narrower, or shallower depth of field, in whichever configuration that the application requires.
Therefore, in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention, a series of steps are provided for enhancing stability criteria of computational stereo. Inventive segment definitions are presented, as well as their transition criteria from unstable to stable, and between the various inventive additional segment definitions. The concept of computing depth on one or more residual components of an image sequence is also presented. Orthogonal decomposition of an image sequence in the color space may enhance disparity decomposition by reducing the overall population of candidate pixels that can match for a given disparity. A final depth map may be comprised of composites of all the different depth maps that are produced in these orthogonal projections. Additionally, depth of field of a scene may be manipulated to highlight differences between the foreground and background and improve depth computation through segment matching and background manipulation/modeling. A new, dynamic approach to varying the depth of field and the subsequent depth compute via MEMs is also presented.
API/SDK
In accordance with a further embodiment of the invention, an API is presented that preferably takes advantage of the information provided from the depth computation, such that critical points, gesture events, as well as overall depth information is provided as part of the API. Additionally, an SDK is preferably presented such that software developers can take advantage of these various features.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/087,522, filed Nov. 2, 2020 to El Dokor et al., titled Method and Apparatus for Enhancing Stereo Vision, currently pending, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/993,414, filed May 30, 2018 to El Dokor et al., titled Method and Apparatus for Enhancing Stereo Vision, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,825,159, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/136,904 to El Dokor et al., titled Method and Apparatus for Enhancing Stereo Vision, filed Apr. 23, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,037,602, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/226,858 to El Dokor et al., filed Mar. 27, 2014, titled Method and Apparatus for Enhancing Stereo Vision Through Image Segmentation, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,324,154, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/316,606 to El Dokor et al. filed Dec. 12, 2011 titled Method and Apparatus for Enhanced Stereo Vision, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,718,387, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/297,029 filed 15 Nov. 2011 to Cluster et at. titled Method and Apparatus for Fast Computational Stereo, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,705,877, which is in turn a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/294,481 filed 11 Nov. 2011 to El Dokor et al. titled Method and Apparatus for Enhanced Stereo Vision, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,672,609. The '606 application is also a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/297,144 filed 15 Nov. 2011 to Cluster et al. titled Method and Apparatus for Fast Computational Stereo, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,761,509, which is in turn a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/294,481 filed 11 Nov. 2011 to El Dokor et al. titled Method and Apparatus for Enhanced Stereo Vision, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,672,609.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5454043 | Freeman | Sep 1995 | A |
5544050 | Abe et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5581276 | Cipolla et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5594469 | Freeman et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5699441 | Sagawa et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5767842 | Korth | Jun 1998 | A |
5887069 | Sakou et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5990865 | Gard | Nov 1999 | A |
6002808 | Freeman | Dec 1999 | A |
6072494 | Nguyen | Jun 2000 | A |
6075895 | Qiao et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6115482 | Sears et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128003 | Smith et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141434 | Christian et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6147678 | Kumar et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6181343 | Lyons | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6195104 | Lyons | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6204852 | Kumar et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215890 | Matsuo et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222465 | Kumar et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6240197 | Christian et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240198 | Rehg et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6252598 | Segen | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256033 | Nguyen | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6256400 | Takata et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269172 | Rehg et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6323942 | Bamji | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324453 | Breed et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6360003 | Doi et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363160 | Bradski et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6377238 | McPheters | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389182 | Ihara et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6394557 | Bradski | May 2002 | B2 |
6400830 | Christian et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6434255 | Harakawa | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442465 | Breed et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6456728 | Doi et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6478432 | Dyner | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6509707 | Yamashita et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6512838 | Rafii et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6526156 | Black et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6553296 | Breed et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6556708 | Christian et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6571193 | Unuma et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6590605 | Eichenlaub | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6600475 | Gutta et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6608910 | Srinivasa et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6614422 | Rafii et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624833 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6674877 | Jojic et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6674895 | Rafii et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6678425 | Flores et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6681031 | Cohen et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6683968 | Pavlovic et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6757571 | Toyama | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6766036 | Pryor | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6768486 | Szabo et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6788809 | Grzeszczuk et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6795567 | Cham et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6801637 | Voronka et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6804396 | Higaki et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6829730 | Nadeau-Dostie et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6857746 | Dyner | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6901561 | Kirkpatrick et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6937742 | Roberts et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6940646 | Taniguchi et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6944315 | Zipperer et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6950534 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6993462 | Pavlovic et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7039676 | Day et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7046232 | Inagaki et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7050606 | Paul et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7050624 | Dialameh et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7058204 | Hildreth et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7065230 | Yuasa et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068842 | Liang et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7095401 | Liu et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7102615 | Marks | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7129927 | Mattson | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7170492 | Bell | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7190811 | Ivanov | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7203340 | Gorodnichy | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7212663 | Tomasi | May 2007 | B2 |
7221779 | Kawakami et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7224830 | Nefian et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7224851 | Kinjo | May 2007 | B2 |
7233320 | Lapstun et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7236611 | Roberts et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7239718 | Park et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7257237 | Luck et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7274800 | Nefian et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7274803 | Sharma et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7289645 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7295709 | Cootes et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7296007 | Funge et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7308112 | Fujimura et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7340077 | Gokturk et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7340078 | Shikano et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7342485 | Joehl et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7346192 | Yuasa et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7348963 | Bell | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7359529 | Lee | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7372977 | Fujimura et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7379563 | Shamaie | May 2008 | B2 |
7391409 | Zalewski et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7394346 | Bodin | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7412077 | Li et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7415126 | Breed et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7415212 | Matsushita et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7421093 | Hildreth et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7423540 | Kisacanin | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7444001 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7450736 | Yang et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460690 | Cohen et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7477758 | Piirainen et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7489308 | Blake et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7489806 | Mohri et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7499569 | Sato et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7512262 | Criminisi et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7519223 | Dehlin et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7519537 | Rosenberg | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7545417 | Miwa | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7574020 | Shamale | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7590262 | Fujimura et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7593552 | Higaki et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7598942 | Underkoffler et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7599547 | Sun et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7606411 | Venetsky et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7614019 | Rimas Ribikauskas et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7620316 | Boillot | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7646372 | Marks et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7660437 | Breed | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7665041 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7676062 | Breed et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7720282 | Blake et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7721207 | Nilsson | May 2010 | B2 |
7804998 | Mundermann et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8026842 | Fox | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8379926 | Kanhere | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8705877 | Cluster | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8718387 | El Dokor | May 2014 | B1 |
8761509 | Cluster | Jun 2014 | B1 |
20010001182 | Ito et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010030642 | Sullivan et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020041327 | Hildreth et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020064382 | Hildreth et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020090133 | Kim et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020140633 | Rafii et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040183775 | Bell | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050002074 | McPheters et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050083314 | Shalit et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050105775 | Luo et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050190443 | Nam et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050286756 | Hong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060093186 | Ivanov | May 2006 | A1 |
20060101354 | Hashimoto et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060136846 | Im et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060139314 | Bell | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060221072 | Se et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070055427 | Sun et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070113207 | Gritton | May 2007 | A1 |
20070132721 | Glomski et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070195997 | Paul et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070263932 | Bernardin et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070280505 | Breed | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002878 | Meiyappan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005703 | Radivojevic et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080013793 | Hillis et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080037875 | Kim et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052643 | Ike et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059578 | Albertson et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065291 | Breed | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080069415 | Schildkraut et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080069437 | Baker | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080104547 | Morita et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080107303 | Kim et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120577 | Ma et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080178126 | Beeck et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181459 | Martin et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080219501 | Matsumoto | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080219502 | Shamaie | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080225041 | El Dokor et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080229255 | Linjama et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080240502 | Freedman et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080244465 | Kongqiao et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080244468 | Nishihara et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080267449 | Dumas et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080282202 | Sunday | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090006292 | Block | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090027337 | Hildreth | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090037849 | Immonen et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090040215 | Afzulpurkar et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090060268 | Roberts et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090074248 | Cohen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077504 | Bell et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090079813 | Hildreth | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080526 | Vasireddy et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090085864 | Kutliroff et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090102788 | Nishida et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090102800 | Keenan | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090103780 | Nishihara et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090108649 | Kneller et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090109036 | Schalla et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090110292 | Fujimura et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090115721 | Aull et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090116742 | Nishihara | May 2009 | A1 |
20090116749 | Cristinacce et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090129690 | Marcellin et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090150160 | Mozer | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090153366 | Im et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090153655 | Ike et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090180668 | Jones et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090183125 | Magal et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090183193 | Miller, IV | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090189858 | Lev et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090208057 | Wilson et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222149 | Murray et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228841 | Hildreth | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090231278 | St. Hilaire et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090244309 | Maison et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090249258 | Tang | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262986 | Cartey et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268945 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090273563 | Pryor | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090273574 | Pryor | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090273575 | Pryor | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090278915 | Kramer et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090295738 | Chiang | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090296991 | Anzola | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090315740 | Hildreth et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090316952 | Ferren et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100302376 | Boulanger | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110142309 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110210969 | Barenbrug | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110211754 | Litvak | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110249099 | Vandewalle et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120082368 | Hirai et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20130243313 | Civit | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140056472 | Gu | Feb 2014 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Freeman, W. T. et al., “The Design and Use of Steerable Filters”, IEEE Transactions of Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence V. 13, (Sep. 1991), 891-906. |
Simoncelli, E.P. et al., “Shiftable Multi-scale Transforms”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory V. 38, (Mar. 1992), 587-607. |
Simoncelli, E.P. et al., “The Steerable Pyramid: A Flexible Architecture for Multi-Scale Derivative Computation”, Proceedings of ICIP-95 V. 3, (Oct. 1995), 444-447. |
Chen, J et al., “Adaptive Perceptual Color-Texture Image Segmentation”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, v. 14, No. 10 (Oct. 2005), 1524-1536 (2004 revised draft). |
Halfhill, Tom R., “Parallel Processing with CUDA”, Microprocessor Report, Available at http://www.nvidia.com/docs/IO/55972/220401_Reprint.pdf, (Jan. 28, 2008). |
Farber, Rob “CUDA, Supercomputing for the Masses: Part 4, The CUDA Memory Model”, Under the High Performance Computing section of the Dr. Dobbs website, p. 3 available at http://www.ddj.com/hpc-high-performance-computing/208401741, 3. |
Rajko, S et al., “HMM Parameter Reduction for Practice Gesture Recognition”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Automatic Gesture Recognition, (Sep. 2008). |
Hinton, Geoffrey et al., “A Fast Learning Algorithm for Deep Belief Nets”, Neural Computation, V. 18, 1527-1554. |
Susskind, Joshua M., et al., “Generating Facial Expressions with Deep Belief Nets”, Department of Psychology, Univ. of Toronto I-Tech Education and Publishing, (2008), 421-440. |
Bleyer, Michael et al., “Surface Stereo with Soft Segmentation.”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE, 2010, (2010). |
Chen, Junqing et al., “Adaptive perceptual color-texture image segmentation.”, The International Society for Optical Engineering, SPIE Newsroom, (2006), 1-2. |
Forsyth, David A., et al., “Stereopsis”, In Computer Vision A Modern Approach Prentice Hall, 2003, (2003). |
Harris, Mark et al., “Parallel Prefix Sum (Scan) with CUDA”, vol. 39, in GPU Gems 3, edited by Hubert Nguyen, (2007). |
Hirschmuller, Heiko “Stereo Vision in Structured Environments by Consistent Semi-Global Matching”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 06, (2006),2386-2393. |
Ivekovic, Spela et al., “Dense Wide-baseline Disparities from Conventional Stereo for Immersive Videoconferencing”, ICPR, 2004, (2004),921-924. |
Kaldewey, Tim et al., “Parallel Search On Video Cards.”, First USENIX Workshop on Hot Topics in Parallelism (HotPar '09), (2009). |
Kirk, David et al., “Programming Massively Parallel Processors A Hands-on Approach”, Elsevier, 2010, (2010). |
Klaus, Andreas et al., “Segment-Based Stereo Matching Using Belief Propagation and a Self-Adapting Dissimilarity Measure”, Proceedings of ICPR 2006. IEEE, 2006. (2006), 15-18. |
Kolmogorov, Vladimir et al., “Computing Visual Correspondence with Occlusions via Graph Cuts”, International Conference on Computer Vision. 2001., (2001). |
Kolmogorov, Vladimir et al., “Generalized Multi-camera Scene Reconstruction Using Graph Cuts.”, Proceedings for the International Workshop on Energy Minimization Methods in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2003., (2003). |
Kuhn, Michael et al., “Efficient ASIC Implementation of a Real-Time Depth Mapping Stereo Vision System”, Proceedings of 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. Taipei, Taiwan: IEEE, 2009., (2009). |
Li, Shigang “Binocular Spherical Stereo”, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (IEEE) 9, No. 4 (Dec. 2008), (Dec. 2008),589-600. |
Marsalek, M et al., “Semantic hierarchies for visual object recognition”, Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2007. CVPR '07. MN: IEEE, 2007, (2007), 1-7. |
Metzger, Wolfgang “Laws of Seeing”, MIT Press, 2006, (2006). |
Min, Dongbo et al., “Cost Aggregation and Occlusion Handling With WLS in Stereo Matching”, Edited by IEEE. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 17 (2008), (2008), 1431-1442. |
“NVIDIA: CUDA compute unified device architecture, prog. guide, version 1.1”, NVIDIA, (2007). |
Remondino, Fabio et al., “Turning Images into 3-D Models”, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, (2008). |
Richardson, Ian E., “H.264/MPEG-4 Part 10 White Paper”, WhitePaper/www.vcodex.com, (2003). |
Sengupta, Shubhabrata “Scan Primitives for GPU Computing”, Proceedings of the 2007 Graphics Hardware Conference. San Diego, CA, 2007, (2007),97-106. |
Sintron, Eric et al., “Fast Parallel GPU-Sorting Using a Hybrid Algorithm”, Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing (Elsevier) 68, No. 10, (Oct. 2008), 1381-1388. |
Wang, Zeng-Fu et al., “A Region Based Stereo Matching Algorithm Using Cooperative Optimization”, CVPR, (2008). |
Wei, Zheng et al., “Optimization of Linked List Prefix Computations on Multithreaded GPUs Using CUDA”, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing (IPDPS), Atlanta, (2010). |
Wiegand, Thomas et al., “Overview of the H.264/AVC Video Coding Standard”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 13, No. 7, (Jul. 2003),560-576. |
Woodford, O.J. et al., “Global Stereo Reconstruction under Second Order Smoothness Priors”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (IEEE) 31, No. 12, (2009),2115-2128. |
Yang, Qingxiong et al., “Stereo Matching with Color-Weighted Correlation, Hierarchical Belief Propagation, and Occlusion Handling”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (IEEE) 31, No. 3, (Mar. 2009),492-504. |
Zinner, Christian et al., “An Optimized Software-Based Implementation of a Census-Based Stereo Matching Algorithm”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (SpringerLink) 5358, (2008),216-227. |
“PCT Search report”, PCT/US2010/035717, (Sep. 1, 2010), 1-29. |
“PCT Written opinion”, PCT/US2010/035717, (Dec. 1, 2011), 1-9. |
“PCT Search report”, PCT/US2011/49043, (Mar. 21, 2012), 1-4. |
“PCT Written opinion”, PCT/US2011/49043, (Mar. 21, 2012), 1-4. |
“PCT Search report”, PCT/US2011/049808, (Jan. 12, 2012), 1-2. |
“PCT Written opinion”, PCT/US2011/049808, (Jan. 12, 2012), 1-5. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/784,123, (Oct. 2, 2012), 1-20. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/784,022, (Jul. 16, 2012), 1-14. |
Tieleman, T et al., “Using Fast weights to improve persistent contrastive divergence”, 26th International Conference on Machine Learning New York, NY ACM, (2009), 1033-1040. |
Sutskever, I. et al., “The recurrent temporal restricted boltzmann machine”, NIPS, MIT Press, (2008), 1601-1608. |
Parzen, E “On the estimation of a probability density function and the mode”, Annals of Math. Stats., 33, (1962), 1065-1076. |
Hopfield, J.J. “Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities”, National Academy of Sciences, 79, (1982),2554-2558. |
Culibrk, D et al., “Neural network approach to background modeling for video object segmentation”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 18, (2007), 1614-1627. |
Benggio, Y et al., “Curriculum learning”, ICML 09 Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning, New York, NY: ACM, (2009). |
Benggio, Y et al., “Scaling learning algorithms towards Al. In L. a Bottou”, Large Scale Kernel Machines, MIT Press, (2007). |
Battiato, S et al., “Exposure correction for imaging devices: An overview”, In R. Lukac (Ed.), Single Sensor Imaging Methods and Applications for Digital Cameras, CRC Press, (2009), 323-350. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/028,704, filed Feb. 2, 2008, Method and System for Vision-Based Interaction in a Virtual Environment. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/405,319, filed Feb. 26, 2012, Method and System for Vision-Based Interaction in a Virtual Environment. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/411,657, filed Mar. 5, 2012, Method and System for Vision-Based Interaction in a Virtual Environment. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/429,437, filed Mar. 25, 2012, Method and System for Vision-Based Interaction in a Virtual Environment. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/562,351, filed Jul. 31, 2012, Method and System for Tracking of a Subject. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/596,093, filed Aug. 28, 2012 Method and Apparatus for Three Dimensional Interaction of a Subject. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/567,888, filed Dec. 7, 2006, Three-Dimensional Virtual-Touch Human-Machine Interface System and Method Therefor. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/572,721, filed Aug. 13, 2012, Method and System for Three-Dimensional Virtual-Touch Interface. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/784,123, filed Mar. 20, 2010, Gesture Recognition Systems and Related Methods. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/784,022, filed May 20, 2010, Systems and Related Methods for Three Dimensional Gesture Recognition in Vehicles. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,038, filed Feb. 10, 2011, Method and Apparatus for Performing Segmentation of an Image. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,055, filed Feb. 10, 2011, Method and Apparatus for Disparity Computation in Stereo Images. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,070, filed Feb. 10, 2011, Method and Apparatus for Determining Disparity of Texture. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/221,903, filed Aug. 31, 2011, Method and Apparatus for Confusion Learning. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/189,517, filed Jul. 24, 2011, Near-Touch Interaction with a Stereo Camera Grid and Structured Tessellations. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/297,029, filed Nov. 15, 2011, Method and Apparatus for Fast Computational Stereo. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/297,144, filed Nov. 15, 2011, Method and Apparatus for Fast Computational Stereo. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,481, filed Nov. 11, 2011, Method and Apparatus for Enhanced Stereo Vision. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/316,606, filed Dec. 12, 2011, Method and Apparatus for Enhanced Stereo Vision. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17087522 | Nov 2020 | US |
Child | 17953014 | US | |
Parent | 15993414 | May 2018 | US |
Child | 17087522 | US | |
Parent | 15136904 | Apr 2016 | US |
Child | 15993414 | US | |
Parent | 14226858 | Mar 2014 | US |
Child | 15136904 | US | |
Parent | 13316606 | Dec 2011 | US |
Child | 14226858 | US | |
Parent | 13297029 | Nov 2011 | US |
Child | 13316606 | US | |
Parent | 13294481 | Nov 2011 | US |
Child | 13297029 | US |