Method and apparatus for enhancing stereo vision

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12131452
  • Patent Number
    12,131,452
  • Date Filed
    Monday, September 26, 2022
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 29, 2024
    24 days ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
    • Golden Edge Holding Corporation (Santa Clara, CA, US)
  • Examiners
    • Vaughn, Jr.; William C
    • Belai; Naod W
    Agents
    • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
Abstract
A method and apparatus for segmenting an image are provided. The method may include the steps of clustering pixels from one of a plurality of images into one or more segments, determining one or more unstable segments changing by more than a predetermined threshold from a prior of the plurality of images, determining one or more segments transitioning from an unstable to a stable segment, determining depth for one or more of the one or more segments that have changed by more than the predetermined threshold, determining depth for one or more of the one or more transitioning segments, and combining the determined depth for the one or more unstable segments and the one or more transitioning segments with a predetermined depth of all segments changing less than the predetermined threshold from the prior of the plurality of images.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Systems and methods for generating depth maps for images have suffered from lack of precision and requirements for great computing resources. Additionally, specialized hardware is often required in order to generate such a depth map. Imprecision in generation of such a depth map may result in poor resolution of acquired images and difficulty in identifying precise locations of objects within those depth maps. Without such precise identification of these locations, later processing of these images and objects may result in a reduced ability to rely on these locations and objects for additional processing.


Therefore, it would be desirable to present a method and apparatus that overcomes the drawbacks of the prior art.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with various embodiments of the present invention, a method and apparatus is provided for stabilizing segmentation and depth calculations. The inventors of the present invention have presented, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/025,038, titled “Method and Apparatus for Performing Segmentation of an Image”, filed Feb. 10, 2011 to El Dokor et al., Ser. No. 13/025,055, titled “Method and Apparatus for Disparity Computation in Stereo Images, filed February 10 to El Dokor et al., and Ser. No. 13/025,070, titled “Method and Apparatus for Determining Disparity of Texture”, filed Feb. 10, 2011 to El Dokor et al., the entire contents of each of these applications being incorporated herein by reference, a case for describing various types of segments, labeled as stable or unstable segments, used for developing a disparity map. This is described as being accomplished by matching such segments with their appropriate counterparts between the two images in a stereo image sequence. Building on the implementation described in the above-mentioned applications, in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention, a series of criteria is presented for updating the various segments, specifically with the goal of efficient and accurate depth map updating.


As is described in the '038, '055 and '070 applications, it is meaningful to look only at one or more changes associated with a given stereo image sequence to produce a subsequent depth map and not the entire image. Thus, rather than recomputing an entirely new depth map for each pair of stereo images over time, only changes between consecutive frames are computed and integrated into one composite depth map. This process is not only computationally more efficient than recomputing the complete depth map for each stereo frame pair, it is also more accurate for matching, since only regions with significant changes are being matched in any given frame or sequence of frames. This is an altogether novel approach to computational stereo as previous attempts have been faced with a significant amount of computational complexity, problems with limiting a candidate space of depth calculations, and a nebulous set of features at best to extract from, without these features being robust to significant changes in the scene's quality or even overall color scheme.


In accordance with various embodiments of the present invention, a framework with which such an approach can be accomplished is provided, defining various types of regions and segments that are associated with such an approach. Also presented are other relevant aspects and features to develop a set of factors that can improve the accuracy of segmentation and the accuracy of the depth map itself, by presenting a shallow-depth of field concept with two different realizations.


Still other objects and advantages of the invention will in part be obvious and will in part be apparent from the specification and drawings.


The invention accordingly comprises the several steps and the relation of one or more of such steps with respect to each of the other steps, and the apparatus embodying features of construction, combinations of elements and arrangement of parts that are adapted to affect such steps, all as exemplified in the following detailed disclosure, and the scope of the invention will be indicated in the claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more complete understanding of the invention, reference is made to the following description and accompanying drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 is a flowchart diagram depicting relationships between a number of segment classifications in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 2 is a flowchart diagram depicting processing for updating a depth map in accordance with a depth map in accordance with the invention;



FIG. 3 is a state diagram depicting a relationship for movement between different pixel segments in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 4 is a flowchart diagram depicting 3D segmentation of a depth map;



FIG. 5 is a flowchart diagram depicting 3D segmentation of a depth map using gray world and color world segments;



FIG. 6 depicts a number of steps for segmentation and depth calculation in accordance with an embodiment of the invention; and



FIG. 7 depicts the relationship of a MEM-mounted lens and an image sensor in accordance with an additional embodiment of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

One or more embodiments of the invention will now be described, making reference to the following drawings in which like reference numbers indicate like structure between the drawings.


An image scene may be organized into a series of homogenized segments, or “regions”, defined by their color, texture properties or other relevant properties. Each of these regions defines one or more segments in the image. The challenge for creating a disparity map (and hence, a depth map) from such segments lies in matching these segments against their correct counterparts in a secondary image (the other image in, for example, a stereo pair of images). To accomplish that, an even bigger challenge is associated with segmenting these images into segments of meaningful context. The above-mentioned '038, '055 and '070 applications present a more detailed discussion of the different clustering techniques that may be associated with defining segments, and associated matching techniques. One of the most important assumptions that was made in these applications, and that carries through to the present invention, is that changes in the image, in general, are very gradual. While there are regions of abrupt changes, they are few in relationship to an entire image sequence. Most regions exhibit this well-behaved and gradual change. Such gradual transition allows exploitation of redundancy of data between frames to:

    • 1) Stabilize segments, since most segments mostly do not change, i.e. no differences in their pixel values between consecutive frames, based on intra-frame metrics; and
    • 2) Stabilize a subsequent depth map, in that if segments associated with a given disparity value have not changed, then the subsequent depth map also should not change. This makes perceptual sense since changes in the scene's depth should be reflected by changes in the observed field of view.


Given these two general observations, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, a more coherent approach to disparity-based depth compute is provided, in which the depth map is iteratively improved through segmentation, followed by depth computation. Temporal and spatial stability criteria of various segments become crucial to determining disparity updates, and hence depth map updates, since absent of such criteria a temporal-based approach can not be implemented, and the scene's temporal redundancy can not be successfully exploited. Tracking across such a broad range of features ensures that changes in the image are correctly accounted for and integrated into the depth map.


This novel approach to segmentation/depth map calculation allows a highly efficient and accurate depth map to be produced and enables a real-time implementation that can be embedded on smaller platforms, including (system-on-a-chip) SoC platforms, where an existing embedded GPGPU can provide the parallel computation that is preferred to implement this approach.


Given the importance of stability criteria, embodiments of the present invention define various segment types that enhance scene understanding through such criteria, and exploit such criteria to understand scene changes across frames and within the same frame. Thus, as is shown in FIG. 1, five different segment types may be defined. These segments are preferably classified in two groups, non-residual segments 110 and residual segments 120. Residual segments 120 further may comprise stable segments 112, partially stable segments 114 and mesostable segments 116. Similarly, residual segments may comprise unstable segments 122 and unsegmented background 124. As is further shown in FIG. 1, pixels may move between these segments as will be described in accordance with the flowchart set forth in FIG. 2. Therefore, at step 210, a previous cluster map is copied and stored in memory as a current cluster map. Next, at step 215, all pixels that have changed in color by more than Tps (or frames) are declared residual. Then, at step 220, one or more residual pixels may be clustered together to form one or more unstable segments (as such because they are just formed). At step 225, depth is calculated for all partially stable and unstable segments. Then, the depth computed for the unstable segments is considered at step 230, and if the calculated depth is determined to be valid, the corresponding unstable segment is moved to the mesostable range. Mesostable segments remaining after Tms frames are moved to the stable range at step 235, and at step 240 mesostable segmentation is refined so that segments with the best color match between stable and mesostable ranges are merged. Finally at step 245, non-residual segments are reevaluated for stability.


Table 1, below, depicts the various segment types, and a description of characteristics of that segment type. As can be seen, stable segments have little or no change, while partially stable segments have a small amount of change, but the segment is still considered generally stable. Mesostable segments are transitioning from an unstable classification to a more stable classification, while an unstable segment has enough motion that it may have to be resegmented, and may be a result of any of the other classifications. Other/background segments include all other pixels that cannot be placed into a segment with other pixels.









TABLE I







Description of various segments and pixels.










Pixel
Segment
Segment



Classification
Classification
Subcategory
Description





Non-residual
Mostly Stable
Stable
Segments that have




Segments
had little r no change


Pixels
Segments
Partially Stable
Segments with a small




Segments
amount of change



Mesostable

Segments that have



Segments

partially stabilized





from being unstable


Residual
Unstable

Segments with



Segments

significant enough





motion that have to





be resegmented


Pixels
Other/

Every other type of



Background

pixel, including,





background filtered





out pixels, noise, etc.









As is noted, pixels therefore may move between classifications based upon change associated therewith. A state diagram depicting movement paths between various classifications is shown at FIG. 3. As can be seen in FIG. 3 (as well as with the arrow indicators in FIG. 1), a stable segment 310 can remain a stable segment, can be changed to a partially stable segment 320 if a small amount of change is determined, or can be declared an unstable segment 340 if significant change is determined. Similarly, a partially stable segment 320 can become a stable segment 310 if it remains partially stable for a predetermined period of time, can become a mesostable segment 330 if some change below a predetermined threshold is detected, and can become an unstable segment 340 if significant change greater than a predetermined threshold is determined. Similarly, a mesostable segment 330 can become a partially stable segment 320 or a stable segment 310 if no change is determined, and it can become an unstable segment 340 if a lot of change is determined. Finally, various pixels in the unstable segments may be declared “other” (or unsegmented) 350 if they do not appear to be able to be segmented. The predetermined threshold may be predefined, or learned in accordance with processing of data.


Therefore, pixels may be classified into one of the two general classes: residual pixels, i.e. pixels that have changed in the image as determined in accordance with one or more intra-frame metrics, and non-residual pixels representing pixels that have not changed, also based on such metrics. Segments undertake the overall process described earlier: they may be first created, by identifying pixels that are residual. They then may migrate to states of mesostability or stability, depending on the associated criteria. A depth may be computed and associated with such segments, and then a second depth-based segmentation step may be implemented. By default, any pixel or group of pixels that have not been assigned to stable or mesostable, are assigned to unstable.


Organizing a scene into various segments is preferably predicated upon the concept that neighboring pixels generally exhibit similar behavior, and hence generally do belong to the same segment. This behavior may involve characteristics of motion, color changes, texture features, or any combination of features. The exception to this notion lies at object boundaries and/or at depth discontinuities.


Once objects, or segments, are identified as stable or unstable, the natural progression is towards cluster numbers that stabilize the process over time, so that only changes in images are accounted for. This general theoretical approach, though very different in its details, is widely exploited in video encoding (Wiegand, Sullivan, Bjøntegaard, & Luthra, 2003) at a much more basic level, in which segments are considered for dominant features for texture or motion-based coding. The most substantial contribution and difference here is the explicit definition of different segment types, their lifecycle, and the associated pixel states, aspects of the work that are not present in video coding. Additionally video coding techniques do not attempt to glean or extract depth or even associated segments with various depths. The invention as set forth in one or more embodiments of the present invention also exploits advances in GPU computing to parallelize the process of clustering and scene organization.


The utilization of image segments for calculating depth and iteratively improving segmentation through gleaning scene queues of perceptual relevance allows disparity computation to take place in a very efficient manner. A feature, such as motion, that can be a very dominant feature in scene analysis, can be extracted from mesostable segments, i.e., segments transitioning between an unstable state and a stable one. Local changes in the image that are associated with motion may be clustered and tracked through residual segmentation first. Disparities may then be computed by only matching such segments with ones that represent similar mesostable changes and ignoring all other pixels. Hence, the search space that is associated with disparity matching is greatly reduced, and matching accuracy is enhanced. Once depth is computed, a new depth map can be reclustered based on combining stable segments with recently depth-computed mesostable segments.



FIG. 4 depicts a process associated with this inventive approach. 2D Segmentation may be first attempted at step 410 on the image sequence and regions are broken into homogeneous segments of color/texture/orientation and scale. For orientation and scale, it is preferred that a variant of the complex wavelet transform be used to extract texture information. A depth map is preferably next computed in step 420, based on the segmentation step. In real-time, unstable pixels may be clustered together to form residual regions that are segmented separately in step 415 and then have their depth computed next at step 425. The newly computed regions' residual depth map may then be combined with the stable depth map at step 430. The overall composite map may then be reclustered by combining mesostable segments with stable segments in a step that also involves segmentation based on depth.


Similar to the process noted above, one or more color spaces may be combined together to produce meaningful segmentation processing. In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, not only are residual segments computed, but a scene may be broken down into two or more orthogonal scenes: one of high Chroma (color world) and one of low Chroma (gray world). The two scenes may then be segmented, and then the steps set forth in FIG. 4 may also be implemented for each segmentation. The result is a more complete and comprehensive depth map. In the gray world, intensity becomes a dominant feature, with extracted scale-space and frequency features being used in disparity decomposition. As a result, the task of depth map computation may be been divided into two tasks, depending on the individual pixel's (and associated regions') dominant features: for color pixels, hue is a good representation of color. For low-Chroma pixels, intensity helps in differentiating the pixel. Gradients and structures that are associated with these features can be extracted, as well as the scales that are associated with such gradients. However, the fundamental approach described earlier remains unchanged, namely: performing segmentation and/or residual segmentation, and then computing depth on both, and combining the results in an overall composite depth map.


Once the gray world depth map has been created, it can be easily combined and fused with the high-Chroma depth map, presented earlier. FIG. 5 represents the algorithm with the two processes running simultaneously, 510 representing the processing of FIG. 4 applied to the color world data and 520 representing the processing of FIG. 4 applied to the gray world. In the particular embodiment of FIG. 5, data need not be shared between the two processes, but rather, the final result is preferably combined to produce a composite depth map 530.



FIG. 6 depicts a three-frame sequence in which depth computation may be performed, in two aspects: for stable segments as well as the unstable segments. After initial segmentation of unstable segments, a depth computation is performed on partially stable segments as well as mesostable segments. Therefore, as is shown in FIG. 6, row 610 depicts a series of source images at frames fi, fi+1, fi+2. In this particular example, an idealized movement of a user's arm is shown between frames in a sequence, these frames not necessarily being consecutive. Employing the residual 2D segmentation process described above, row 620 depicts such residual segmentation, and in particular depicts the positioning of the hand in the prior frame and the new position overlaid. Areas of the new position that overlap the old position are further segmented. Row 630 then shows the results of depth computation, figuring the depth of each of the segments shown in the residual segmentation process of row 620. Row 640 depicts performance of 3D segmentation as described, and finally depth composition is shown at row 650. Thus, in accordance with FIG. 6, a three-frame sequence in which depth computation is performed is shown. The depth computation may be performed in two aspects: for stable segments as well as for unstable segments. After initial segmentation of unstable segments, depth computation may be performed on partially stable segments as well as mesostable segments.


In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, based upon the determination that video sequences are well behaved, then one may make the additional useful assumption that any associated segmentation map and any additional subsequently computed maps are likely also well behaved. Thus, even when confronted with a given partially stable segment whose disparity is to be recalculated, a well-behaved segment allows the assumption that a newly computed disparity for that segment is likely in the neighborhood of the old one from the previous frame, as the segment may be tracked across one or more frames. As such, it is possible to define two second level types of stability for a particular partially stable segment:

    • 1. Major stability, indicating that very few pixels have changed. Thus, it may be determined that there has not been enough change to warrant a reevaluation of the segment's disparity, i.e. new depth calculation.
    • 2. Minor stability, indicating that enough of the pixels have changed that depth is to be recalculated.


      If segment stability does not fall into either of the above mentioned categories, and it is therefore determined that the segment is unstable, then pixels associated with this segment are preferably classified as unstable and the entire segmentation process may be repeated.


All pixels in corresponding images are preferably marked with their respective states. This is particularly important since matching relevant pixels with each other across frames requires a mechanism with which such pixels are correctly marked. From an implementation perspective, marking pixels during disparity decomposition in a manner as described in the above-mentioned '038, '055 and '070 applications, while matching, is an effective interpretation of this approach. Marked out pixels cannot contribute to further matching during the disparity decomposition step, and so false positives are reduced. Disparity decomposition, as described in the above-mentioned '038, '055 and '070 applications can be conducted left-to-right or right-to-left, and pixels with existing and accurate disparity can be marked out to reduce the search space that is associated with the disparity decomposition.


Block-Based GPU Clustering and Implementation on a Discrete GPU or an Integrated GPU of a System on a Chip


GPU technology allows for launching of multiple simultaneously processed threads for processing video images. The threads are preferably managed by a thread scheduler, each thread adapted to work on one or more pixels in an image. See (NVIDIA: CUDA compute unified device architecture, prog. guide, version 1.1, 2007) for more details. Groups of threads may be combined to process pixel blocks with having rectangular or other desirable dimensions. One or more methods for clustering of such pixels employing GPU-based implementations are described in the above-mentioned '038, '055 and '070 applications, in which block based statistics are first computed and then combined across blocks. As a direct result of this process, localized statistics representing intermediate results of various clusters at GPU block-level (from the GPU architecture) are available. Additionally, one or more global statistics constituting localized combinations of all the localized block-level statistics are also available. This means that for any given cluster, both localized as well as global statistical information is available for segmentation. This same paradigm would also apply to GPUs that are integrated onboard an SoC, like ARM's MALI or Imgtec's SGX PowerVR or any other GPU or GPU IP representation involving the utilization of SIMD architectures and calling functions.


When performing segmentation of an image, one of the biggest challenges involves finding the correct optimizations of local and global metrics that are associated with a given segment or cluster to allow for appropriate clustering of different segments in an image. For any given residual segment, clustering an existing stable segment not only requires global statistics, but also local ones. This is especially true for larger segments, in which global statistics may vary drastically from local ones, especially in the presence of a color or texture gradient. Two segments may have very different overall global statistics, but they may also have local statistics that are well suited to allow them to cluster together. Utilizing the GPU's intrinsic properties involving launching blocks of threads to operate on contiguous data, adjacent blocks that belong to two different clusters may be very similar and can be used to combine clusters together. This can also apply for tracking changes in blocks of data that are associated with larger segments. Utilizing block-based statistics allows segments to remain relatively stable as they transition between states, and as they temporally progress and evolve through an image sequence.


The thread scheduler can also be modified through configuration settings, to account for such a computational stereo approach.


The inventive approach specifically utilizes the GPU's thread scheduler as a means of imposing local metrics on image segmentation. As a result, local metrics become an intrinsic consequence of the GPU architecture, provided appropriate implementation in either software or hardware or both.


A GPU-based architecture can then be designed to optimize the utilization of the GPU's thread scheduler for segmentation. Arithmetic Logic Units (ALUs) can be used to process adjacent pixels in an image, local changes being associated with thread blocks and global changes being represented as combinations of such local changes. Merging at the block level before merging on the grid level, i.e. entire image, allows all threads in a block to write to fewer locations, mitigating many atomic operations. Atomic operations are a common bottleneck associated with computer vision algorithms being implemented on GPGPU architectures.


Shallow Depth of Field


Depth of field is that part of the field of view of a camera that contains the sharpest edges (the amount of sharpness in the scene), see (Peterson, 2010). Peterson defines three major factors contributing to depth of field:

    • The focal length of the lens
    • The distance between the sensor and the object in the field-of-view
    • Aperture of the lens


A shallow depth of field has the effect of blurring objects outside regions with high sharpness (i.e. outside regions in focus). The blurring effect can aid in identifying background objects. Features associated with scale and frequency can be exploited to mitigate the background objects, reduce scene clutter, and improve depth computation accuracy.


Various embodiments of the present invention include at least two approaches to mitigate excessive FLOPs computation based on exploiting properties of the field-of-view through blurring the background with a shallow depth of field. In doing so, the background selectively stands in contrast to the foreground, and can be removed through the utilization of large-scale low pass filtering kernels or selective wavelet-based filtering, since background blurriness becomes a salient feature of the scene and can be exploited. During residual segmentation, having a shallow depth of field enhances matching foreground-segmented objects, since erroneous background objects are minimized with a more blurred background model. There are many techniques to highlight the fundamental differences between the foreground and background in a scene with a shallow depth of field. Techniques like PCA, SVM, or training a Neural Network can be used to detect such regions' features. There also exists prior work in the literature on sharpness metrics that can also be applied in this case to enhance foreground-background discriminability. The two methods for reducing such depth of field will now be described.


Space-Frequency Feature Extraction for Segment Matching


One inventive approach for matching segments or image regions is to utilize space-frequency features utilizing tools such as wavelet decomposition. Therefore, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the following process may be employed. First, a candidate segment is preferably defined, {tilde over (s)}R(x,y), whose disparity is being evaluated. An operator F{ψR(x,y)} is also defined such that ψR(x,y) is a basis function. A space-frequency decomposition may therefore be defined as:

R{tilde over (s)}R(x,y)−{tilde over (s)}R(x,y)*F{ψR(x,y)}


As noted above, such features allow a background model to be extracted and utilized in matching and segmentation. With a background that is relatively uniform and smooth, frequency-space decomposition can then be applied to the scene, with a background model whose main features constitute spatially larger scales as well as lower frequencies. The task of matching foreground objects with their correct disparities then becomes simpler, given the relative consistency of background features.


Utilizing Micro-Electronic Machines (MEMS) for Adaptive Focus/Defocus and Aperture Size Modification


An alternative approach to enabling background defocus, or blurring is through changing the background model via varying the focal length by mounting the lens on microelectronic machines (MEMs). Therefore, as is shown in FIG. 7, a lens 710 is mounted to a MEM 720 allowing for varying a distance between the lens 710 and a sensor 730. Once lens 710 is mounted, MEM 720 can modify the focal length based on optimal depth engine feedback. This can be performed iteratively with the depth engine. So, if the foreground segmentation quality is poor, a shallower depth of field may be accomplished by employing MEM 720 that allows lens 710 to expand away from, or towards sensor 730, varying the focal length in real-time. Another advantage of utilizing MEMs lies in the ability to define a narrow depth of field by varying both the aperture as well as the focal length.


As a result, another approach can be suggested in which an artificial intelligence system, such as the one that has been described in the above-mentioned '038, '055 and '070 applications, can be used to evaluate the quality of segmentation. The AI can then interactively vary the image by enhancing segmentation through a narrower, or shallower depth of field, in whichever configuration that the application requires.


Therefore, in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention, a series of steps are provided for enhancing stability criteria of computational stereo. Inventive segment definitions are presented, as well as their transition criteria from unstable to stable, and between the various inventive additional segment definitions. The concept of computing depth on one or more residual components of an image sequence is also presented. Orthogonal decomposition of an image sequence in the color space may enhance disparity decomposition by reducing the overall population of candidate pixels that can match for a given disparity. A final depth map may be comprised of composites of all the different depth maps that are produced in these orthogonal projections. Additionally, depth of field of a scene may be manipulated to highlight differences between the foreground and background and improve depth computation through segment matching and background manipulation/modeling. A new, dynamic approach to varying the depth of field and the subsequent depth compute via MEMs is also presented.


API/SDK


In accordance with a further embodiment of the invention, an API is presented that preferably takes advantage of the information provided from the depth computation, such that critical points, gesture events, as well as overall depth information is provided as part of the API. Additionally, an SDK is preferably presented such that software developers can take advantage of these various features.

Claims
  • 1. A method for segmenting an image, comprising the steps of: defining one or more segments from one of a plurality of images;determining one or more unstable segments of the one or more segments changing by more than a predetermined threshold from a prior of the plurality of images;determining one or more transitioning segments transitioning from an unstable to a stable segment;determining depth only for one or more of the one or more unstable segments that have changed by more than the predetermined threshold and for one or more of the one or more transitioning segments; andcombining the determined depth for the one or more unstable segments and the one or more transitioning segments with a preexisting depth map.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more transitioning segments comprise one or more mesostable segments.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more segments are defined from a stereo pair of images.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the determined depth for the one or more unstable and transitioning segments replaces a prior corresponding depth value in the preexisting depth map.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of generating a new depth map associated with the one of the plurality of images in accordance with the determined depth for the one or more unstable segments, the one or more transitioning segments, and the preexisting depth map.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, further comprising the step of repeating the process for generating the new depth map of a next sequential frame from the plurality of images, such that only changes in depth are computed.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein a depth map associated with a next frame is generated by starting with the depth map associated with the one of the plurality of images, and recalculating depth associated with one or more unstable segments or portions of such segments that have changed by more than the predetermined threshold and one or more transitioning segments.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the predetermined threshold may be learned.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, further comprising combining one or more transitioning segments with the stable segment to produce a different stable segment.
  • 10. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing a computer program, the computer program causing a multi-purpose computer to segment an image by performing the steps of: defining one or more segments from one of a plurality of images;determining one or more unstable segments of the one or more segments changing by more than a predetermined threshold from a prior of the plurality of images;determining one or more transitioning segments transitioning from an unstable to a stable segment;determining depth only for one or more of the one or more unstable segments that have changed by more than the predetermined threshold, and for one or more of the one or more transitioning segments; andcombining the determined depth for the one or more unstable segments and the one or more transitioning segments with a preexisting depth map.
  • 11. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10, wherein the transitioning segments comprise one or more mesostable segments.
  • 12. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10, wherein the one or more segments are clustered from a stereo pair of images.
  • 13. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10, wherein the determined depth for the one or more unstable and transitioning segments replaces a prior corresponding depth value in the preexisting depth map.
  • 14. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 13, further comprising the step of generating a new depth map associated with the one of the plurality of images in accordance with the determined depth for the one or more unstable segments, the one or more transitioning segments, and the preexisting depth map.
  • 15. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 14, further comprising the step of repeating the process for generating a depth map of a next sequential frame from the plurality of images.
  • 16. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15, wherein a depth map associated with a next frame is generated by starting with the depth map associated with the one of the plurality of images, and recalculating depth associated with one or more segments that have changed more than the predetermined threshold and one or more transitioning segments.
  • 17. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 16, wherein the predetermined threshold is learned.
  • 18. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10, wherein one or more of the steps performed by the multi-purpose computer are performed by a graphical processing unit.
  • 19. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10, further comprising the step of assigning cluster numbers to the one or more segments according to their classification as unstable, transitioning or stable.
  • 20. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 19, further comprising the step of changing a cluster number of a segment when the segment transitions from one classification to another.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/087,522, filed Nov. 2, 2020 to El Dokor et al., titled Method and Apparatus for Enhancing Stereo Vision, currently pending, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/993,414, filed May 30, 2018 to El Dokor et al., titled Method and Apparatus for Enhancing Stereo Vision, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,825,159, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/136,904 to El Dokor et al., titled Method and Apparatus for Enhancing Stereo Vision, filed Apr. 23, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,037,602, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/226,858 to El Dokor et al., filed Mar. 27, 2014, titled Method and Apparatus for Enhancing Stereo Vision Through Image Segmentation, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,324,154, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/316,606 to El Dokor et al. filed Dec. 12, 2011 titled Method and Apparatus for Enhanced Stereo Vision, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,718,387, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/297,029 filed 15 Nov. 2011 to Cluster et at. titled Method and Apparatus for Fast Computational Stereo, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,705,877, which is in turn a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/294,481 filed 11 Nov. 2011 to El Dokor et al. titled Method and Apparatus for Enhanced Stereo Vision, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,672,609. The '606 application is also a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/297,144 filed 15 Nov. 2011 to Cluster et al. titled Method and Apparatus for Fast Computational Stereo, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,761,509, which is in turn a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/294,481 filed 11 Nov. 2011 to El Dokor et al. titled Method and Apparatus for Enhanced Stereo Vision, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,672,609.

US Referenced Citations (239)
Number Name Date Kind
5454043 Freeman Sep 1995 A
5544050 Abe et al. Aug 1996 A
5581276 Cipolla et al. Dec 1996 A
5594469 Freeman et al. Jan 1997 A
5699441 Sagawa et al. Dec 1997 A
5767842 Korth Jun 1998 A
5887069 Sakou et al. Mar 1999 A
5990865 Gard Nov 1999 A
6002808 Freeman Dec 1999 A
6072494 Nguyen Jun 2000 A
6075895 Qiao et al. Jun 2000 A
6115482 Sears et al. Sep 2000 A
6128003 Smith et al. Oct 2000 A
6141434 Christian et al. Oct 2000 A
6147678 Kumar et al. Nov 2000 A
6181343 Lyons Jan 2001 B1
6195104 Lyons Feb 2001 B1
6204852 Kumar et al. Mar 2001 B1
6215890 Matsuo et al. Apr 2001 B1
6222465 Kumar et al. Apr 2001 B1
6240197 Christian et al. May 2001 B1
6240198 Rehg et al. May 2001 B1
6252598 Segen Jun 2001 B1
6256033 Nguyen Jul 2001 B1
6256400 Takata et al. Jul 2001 B1
6269172 Rehg et al. Jul 2001 B1
6323942 Bamji Nov 2001 B1
6324453 Breed et al. Nov 2001 B1
6360003 Doi et al. Mar 2002 B1
6363160 Bradski et al. Mar 2002 B1
6377238 McPheters Apr 2002 B1
6389182 Ihara et al. May 2002 B1
6394557 Bradski May 2002 B2
6400830 Christian et al. Jun 2002 B1
6434255 Harakawa Aug 2002 B1
6442465 Breed et al. Aug 2002 B2
6456728 Doi et al. Sep 2002 B1
6478432 Dyner Nov 2002 B1
6509707 Yamashita et al. Jan 2003 B2
6512838 Rafii et al. Jan 2003 B1
6526156 Black et al. Feb 2003 B1
6553296 Breed et al. Apr 2003 B2
6556708 Christian et al. Apr 2003 B1
6571193 Unuma et al. May 2003 B1
6590605 Eichenlaub Jul 2003 B1
6600475 Gutta et al. Jul 2003 B2
6608910 Srinivasa et al. Aug 2003 B1
6614422 Rafii et al. Sep 2003 B1
6624833 Kumar et al. Sep 2003 B1
6674877 Jojic et al. Jan 2004 B1
6674895 Rafii et al. Jan 2004 B2
6678425 Flores et al. Jan 2004 B1
6681031 Cohen et al. Jan 2004 B2
6683968 Pavlovic et al. Jan 2004 B1
6757571 Toyama Jun 2004 B1
6766036 Pryor Jul 2004 B1
6768486 Szabo et al. Jul 2004 B1
6788809 Grzeszczuk et al. Sep 2004 B1
6795567 Cham et al. Sep 2004 B1
6801637 Voronka et al. Oct 2004 B2
6804396 Higaki et al. Oct 2004 B2
6829730 Nadeau-Dostie et al. Dec 2004 B2
6857746 Dyner Feb 2005 B2
6901561 Kirkpatrick et al. May 2005 B1
6937742 Roberts et al. Aug 2005 B2
6940646 Taniguchi et al. Sep 2005 B2
6944315 Zipperer et al. Sep 2005 B1
6950534 Cohen et al. Sep 2005 B2
6993462 Pavlovic et al. Jan 2006 B1
7039676 Day et al. May 2006 B1
7046232 Inagaki et al. May 2006 B2
7050606 Paul et al. May 2006 B2
7050624 Dialameh et al. May 2006 B2
7058204 Hildreth et al. Jun 2006 B2
7065230 Yuasa et al. Jun 2006 B2
7068842 Liang et al. Jun 2006 B2
7095401 Liu et al. Aug 2006 B2
7102615 Marks Sep 2006 B2
7129927 Mattson Oct 2006 B2
7170492 Bell Jan 2007 B2
7190811 Ivanov Mar 2007 B2
7203340 Gorodnichy Apr 2007 B2
7212663 Tomasi May 2007 B2
7221779 Kawakami et al. May 2007 B2
7224830 Nefian et al. May 2007 B2
7224851 Kinjo May 2007 B2
7233320 Lapstun et al. Jun 2007 B1
7236611 Roberts et al. Jun 2007 B2
7239718 Park et al. Jul 2007 B2
7257237 Luck et al. Aug 2007 B1
7274800 Nefian et al. Sep 2007 B2
7274803 Sharma et al. Sep 2007 B1
7289645 Yamamoto et al. Oct 2007 B2
7295709 Cootes et al. Nov 2007 B2
7296007 Funge et al. Nov 2007 B1
7308112 Fujimura et al. Nov 2007 B2
7340077 Gokturk et al. Mar 2008 B2
7340078 Shikano et al. Mar 2008 B2
7342485 Joehl et al. Mar 2008 B2
7346192 Yuasa et al. Mar 2008 B2
7348963 Bell Mar 2008 B2
7359529 Lee Apr 2008 B2
7372977 Fujimura et al. May 2008 B2
7379563 Shamaie May 2008 B2
7391409 Zalewski et al. Jun 2008 B2
7394346 Bodin Jul 2008 B2
7412077 Li et al. Aug 2008 B2
7415126 Breed et al. Aug 2008 B2
7415212 Matsushita et al. Aug 2008 B2
7421093 Hildreth et al. Sep 2008 B2
7423540 Kisacanin Sep 2008 B2
7444001 Roberts et al. Oct 2008 B2
7450736 Yang et al. Nov 2008 B2
7460690 Cohen et al. Dec 2008 B2
7477758 Piirainen et al. Jan 2009 B2
7489308 Blake et al. Feb 2009 B2
7489806 Mohri et al. Feb 2009 B2
7499569 Sato et al. Mar 2009 B2
7512262 Criminisi et al. Mar 2009 B2
7519223 Dehlin et al. Apr 2009 B2
7519537 Rosenberg Apr 2009 B2
7545417 Miwa Jun 2009 B2
7574020 Shamale Aug 2009 B2
7590262 Fujimura et al. Sep 2009 B2
7593552 Higaki et al. Sep 2009 B2
7598942 Underkoffler et al. Oct 2009 B2
7599547 Sun et al. Oct 2009 B2
7606411 Venetsky et al. Oct 2009 B2
7614019 Rimas Ribikauskas et al. Nov 2009 B2
7620316 Boillot Nov 2009 B2
7646372 Marks et al. Jan 2010 B2
7660437 Breed Feb 2010 B2
7665041 Wilson et al. Feb 2010 B2
7676062 Breed et al. Mar 2010 B2
7720282 Blake et al. May 2010 B2
7721207 Nilsson May 2010 B2
7804998 Mundermann et al. Sep 2010 B2
8026842 Fox Sep 2011 B2
8379926 Kanhere Feb 2013 B2
8705877 Cluster Apr 2014 B1
8718387 El Dokor May 2014 B1
8761509 Cluster Jun 2014 B1
20010001182 Ito et al. May 2001 A1
20010030642 Sullivan et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020041327 Hildreth et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020064382 Hildreth et al. May 2002 A1
20020090133 Kim et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020140633 Rafii et al. Oct 2002 A1
20040183775 Bell Sep 2004 A1
20050002074 McPheters et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050083314 Shalit et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050105775 Luo et al. May 2005 A1
20050190443 Nam et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050286756 Hong et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060093186 Ivanov May 2006 A1
20060101354 Hashimoto et al. May 2006 A1
20060136846 Im et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060139314 Bell Jun 2006 A1
20060221072 Se et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070055427 Sun et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070113207 Gritton May 2007 A1
20070132721 Glomski et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070195997 Paul et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070263932 Bernardin et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070280505 Breed Dec 2007 A1
20080002878 Meiyappan et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080005703 Radivojevic et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080013793 Hillis et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080037875 Kim et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080052643 Ike et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080059578 Albertson et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065291 Breed Mar 2008 A1
20080069415 Schildkraut et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080069437 Baker Mar 2008 A1
20080104547 Morita et al. May 2008 A1
20080107303 Kim et al. May 2008 A1
20080120577 Ma et al. May 2008 A1
20080178126 Beeck et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080181459 Martin et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080219501 Matsumoto Sep 2008 A1
20080219502 Shamaie Sep 2008 A1
20080225041 El Dokor et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080229255 Linjama et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080240502 Freedman et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080244465 Kongqiao et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080244468 Nishihara et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080267449 Dumas et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080282202 Sunday Nov 2008 A1
20090006292 Block Jan 2009 A1
20090027337 Hildreth Jan 2009 A1
20090037849 Immonen et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090040215 Afzulpurkar et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090060268 Roberts et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090074248 Cohen et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090077504 Bell et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090079813 Hildreth Mar 2009 A1
20090080526 Vasireddy et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090085864 Kutliroff et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090102788 Nishida et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090102800 Keenan Apr 2009 A1
20090103780 Nishihara et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090108649 Kneller et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090109036 Schalla et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090110292 Fujimura et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090115721 Aull et al. May 2009 A1
20090116742 Nishihara May 2009 A1
20090116749 Cristinacce et al. May 2009 A1
20090129690 Marcellin et al. May 2009 A1
20090150160 Mozer Jun 2009 A1
20090153366 Im et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090153655 Ike et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090180668 Jones et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090183125 Magal et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090183193 Miller, IV Jul 2009 A1
20090189858 Lev et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090208057 Wilson et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090222149 Murray et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090228841 Hildreth Sep 2009 A1
20090231278 St. Hilaire et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090244309 Maison et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090249258 Tang Oct 2009 A1
20090262986 Cartey et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090268945 Wilson et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090273563 Pryor Nov 2009 A1
20090273574 Pryor Nov 2009 A1
20090273575 Pryor Nov 2009 A1
20090278915 Kramer et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090295738 Chiang Dec 2009 A1
20090296991 Anzola Dec 2009 A1
20090315740 Hildreth et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090316952 Ferren et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100302376 Boulanger Dec 2010 A1
20110142309 Zhang et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110210969 Barenbrug Sep 2011 A1
20110211754 Litvak Sep 2011 A1
20110249099 Vandewalle et al. Oct 2011 A1
20120082368 Hirai et al. Apr 2012 A1
20130243313 Civit Sep 2013 A1
20140056472 Gu Feb 2014 A1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (71)
Entry
Freeman, W. T. et al., “The Design and Use of Steerable Filters”, IEEE Transactions of Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence V. 13, (Sep. 1991), 891-906.
Simoncelli, E.P. et al., “Shiftable Multi-scale Transforms”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory V. 38, (Mar. 1992), 587-607.
Simoncelli, E.P. et al., “The Steerable Pyramid: A Flexible Architecture for Multi-Scale Derivative Computation”, Proceedings of ICIP-95 V. 3, (Oct. 1995), 444-447.
Chen, J et al., “Adaptive Perceptual Color-Texture Image Segmentation”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, v. 14, No. 10 (Oct. 2005), 1524-1536 (2004 revised draft).
Halfhill, Tom R., “Parallel Processing with CUDA”, Microprocessor Report, Available at http://www.nvidia.com/docs/IO/55972/220401_Reprint.pdf, (Jan. 28, 2008).
Farber, Rob “CUDA, Supercomputing for the Masses: Part 4, The CUDA Memory Model”, Under the High Performance Computing section of the Dr. Dobbs website, p. 3 available at http://www.ddj.com/hpc-high-performance-computing/208401741, 3.
Rajko, S et al., “HMM Parameter Reduction for Practice Gesture Recognition”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Automatic Gesture Recognition, (Sep. 2008).
Hinton, Geoffrey et al., “A Fast Learning Algorithm for Deep Belief Nets”, Neural Computation, V. 18, 1527-1554.
Susskind, Joshua M., et al., “Generating Facial Expressions with Deep Belief Nets”, Department of Psychology, Univ. of Toronto I-Tech Education and Publishing, (2008), 421-440.
Bleyer, Michael et al., “Surface Stereo with Soft Segmentation.”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE, 2010, (2010).
Chen, Junqing et al., “Adaptive perceptual color-texture image segmentation.”, The International Society for Optical Engineering, SPIE Newsroom, (2006), 1-2.
Forsyth, David A., et al., “Stereopsis”, In Computer Vision A Modern Approach Prentice Hall, 2003, (2003).
Harris, Mark et al., “Parallel Prefix Sum (Scan) with CUDA”, vol. 39, in GPU Gems 3, edited by Hubert Nguyen, (2007).
Hirschmuller, Heiko “Stereo Vision in Structured Environments by Consistent Semi-Global Matching”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 06, (2006),2386-2393.
Ivekovic, Spela et al., “Dense Wide-baseline Disparities from Conventional Stereo for Immersive Videoconferencing”, ICPR, 2004, (2004),921-924.
Kaldewey, Tim et al., “Parallel Search On Video Cards.”, First USENIX Workshop on Hot Topics in Parallelism (HotPar '09), (2009).
Kirk, David et al., “Programming Massively Parallel Processors A Hands-on Approach”, Elsevier, 2010, (2010).
Klaus, Andreas et al., “Segment-Based Stereo Matching Using Belief Propagation and a Self-Adapting Dissimilarity Measure”, Proceedings of ICPR 2006. IEEE, 2006. (2006), 15-18.
Kolmogorov, Vladimir et al., “Computing Visual Correspondence with Occlusions via Graph Cuts”, International Conference on Computer Vision. 2001., (2001).
Kolmogorov, Vladimir et al., “Generalized Multi-camera Scene Reconstruction Using Graph Cuts.”, Proceedings for the International Workshop on Energy Minimization Methods in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2003., (2003).
Kuhn, Michael et al., “Efficient ASIC Implementation of a Real-Time Depth Mapping Stereo Vision System”, Proceedings of 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. Taipei, Taiwan: IEEE, 2009., (2009).
Li, Shigang “Binocular Spherical Stereo”, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (IEEE) 9, No. 4 (Dec. 2008), (Dec. 2008),589-600.
Marsalek, M et al., “Semantic hierarchies for visual object recognition”, Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2007. CVPR '07. MN: IEEE, 2007, (2007), 1-7.
Metzger, Wolfgang “Laws of Seeing”, MIT Press, 2006, (2006).
Min, Dongbo et al., “Cost Aggregation and Occlusion Handling With WLS in Stereo Matching”, Edited by IEEE. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 17 (2008), (2008), 1431-1442.
“NVIDIA: CUDA compute unified device architecture, prog. guide, version 1.1”, NVIDIA, (2007).
Remondino, Fabio et al., “Turning Images into 3-D Models”, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, (2008).
Richardson, Ian E., “H.264/MPEG-4 Part 10 White Paper”, WhitePaper/www.vcodex.com, (2003).
Sengupta, Shubhabrata “Scan Primitives for GPU Computing”, Proceedings of the 2007 Graphics Hardware Conference. San Diego, CA, 2007, (2007),97-106.
Sintron, Eric et al., “Fast Parallel GPU-Sorting Using a Hybrid Algorithm”, Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing (Elsevier) 68, No. 10, (Oct. 2008), 1381-1388.
Wang, Zeng-Fu et al., “A Region Based Stereo Matching Algorithm Using Cooperative Optimization”, CVPR, (2008).
Wei, Zheng et al., “Optimization of Linked List Prefix Computations on Multithreaded GPUs Using CUDA”, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing (IPDPS), Atlanta, (2010).
Wiegand, Thomas et al., “Overview of the H.264/AVC Video Coding Standard”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 13, No. 7, (Jul. 2003),560-576.
Woodford, O.J. et al., “Global Stereo Reconstruction under Second Order Smoothness Priors”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (IEEE) 31, No. 12, (2009),2115-2128.
Yang, Qingxiong et al., “Stereo Matching with Color-Weighted Correlation, Hierarchical Belief Propagation, and Occlusion Handling”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (IEEE) 31, No. 3, (Mar. 2009),492-504.
Zinner, Christian et al., “An Optimized Software-Based Implementation of a Census-Based Stereo Matching Algorithm”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (SpringerLink) 5358, (2008),216-227.
“PCT Search report”, PCT/US2010/035717, (Sep. 1, 2010), 1-29.
“PCT Written opinion”, PCT/US2010/035717, (Dec. 1, 2011), 1-9.
“PCT Search report”, PCT/US2011/49043, (Mar. 21, 2012), 1-4.
“PCT Written opinion”, PCT/US2011/49043, (Mar. 21, 2012), 1-4.
“PCT Search report”, PCT/US2011/049808, (Jan. 12, 2012), 1-2.
“PCT Written opinion”, PCT/US2011/049808, (Jan. 12, 2012), 1-5.
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/784,123, (Oct. 2, 2012), 1-20.
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/784,022, (Jul. 16, 2012), 1-14.
Tieleman, T et al., “Using Fast weights to improve persistent contrastive divergence”, 26th International Conference on Machine Learning New York, NY ACM, (2009), 1033-1040.
Sutskever, I. et al., “The recurrent temporal restricted boltzmann machine”, NIPS, MIT Press, (2008), 1601-1608.
Parzen, E “On the estimation of a probability density function and the mode”, Annals of Math. Stats., 33, (1962), 1065-1076.
Hopfield, J.J. “Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities”, National Academy of Sciences, 79, (1982),2554-2558.
Culibrk, D et al., “Neural network approach to background modeling for video object segmentation”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 18, (2007), 1614-1627.
Benggio, Y et al., “Curriculum learning”, ICML 09 Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning, New York, NY: ACM, (2009).
Benggio, Y et al., “Scaling learning algorithms towards Al. In L. a Bottou”, Large Scale Kernel Machines, MIT Press, (2007).
Battiato, S et al., “Exposure correction for imaging devices: An overview”, In R. Lukac (Ed.), Single Sensor Imaging Methods and Applications for Digital Cameras, CRC Press, (2009), 323-350.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/028,704, filed Feb. 2, 2008, Method and System for Vision-Based Interaction in a Virtual Environment.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/405,319, filed Feb. 26, 2012, Method and System for Vision-Based Interaction in a Virtual Environment.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/411,657, filed Mar. 5, 2012, Method and System for Vision-Based Interaction in a Virtual Environment.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/429,437, filed Mar. 25, 2012, Method and System for Vision-Based Interaction in a Virtual Environment.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/562,351, filed Jul. 31, 2012, Method and System for Tracking of a Subject.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/596,093, filed Aug. 28, 2012 Method and Apparatus for Three Dimensional Interaction of a Subject.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/567,888, filed Dec. 7, 2006, Three-Dimensional Virtual-Touch Human-Machine Interface System and Method Therefor.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/572,721, filed Aug. 13, 2012, Method and System for Three-Dimensional Virtual-Touch Interface.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/784,123, filed Mar. 20, 2010, Gesture Recognition Systems and Related Methods.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/784,022, filed May 20, 2010, Systems and Related Methods for Three Dimensional Gesture Recognition in Vehicles.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,038, filed Feb. 10, 2011, Method and Apparatus for Performing Segmentation of an Image.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,055, filed Feb. 10, 2011, Method and Apparatus for Disparity Computation in Stereo Images.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,070, filed Feb. 10, 2011, Method and Apparatus for Determining Disparity of Texture.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/221,903, filed Aug. 31, 2011, Method and Apparatus for Confusion Learning.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/189,517, filed Jul. 24, 2011, Near-Touch Interaction with a Stereo Camera Grid and Structured Tessellations.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/297,029, filed Nov. 15, 2011, Method and Apparatus for Fast Computational Stereo.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/297,144, filed Nov. 15, 2011, Method and Apparatus for Fast Computational Stereo.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,481, filed Nov. 11, 2011, Method and Apparatus for Enhanced Stereo Vision.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/316,606, filed Dec. 12, 2011, Method and Apparatus for Enhanced Stereo Vision.
Continuations (7)
Number Date Country
Parent 17087522 Nov 2020 US
Child 17953014 US
Parent 15993414 May 2018 US
Child 17087522 US
Parent 15136904 Apr 2016 US
Child 15993414 US
Parent 14226858 Mar 2014 US
Child 15136904 US
Parent 13316606 Dec 2011 US
Child 14226858 US
Parent 13297029 Nov 2011 US
Child 13316606 US
Parent 13294481 Nov 2011 US
Child 13297029 US