The present invention relates to the field of fixed abrasive substrates. More particularly, the invention relates to a method and apparatus for fixed abrasive preparation and use in a cluster chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) tool.
One of the last stages before fabrication of semiconductor devices on a semiconductor substrate, such as Si or III-V related compounds (e.g. GaAs, InP), involves the polishing of the semiconductor wafer. One reason wafer polishing is performed is to remove any irregularities present on the surface so that the wafer is smooth and flat prior to performing any initial fabrication steps (such as etch, metalization or photolithography). In addition, CMP is also used to planarize the semiconductor wafer subsequent to initiation of device fabrication, for example after deposition of polyamide or other insulating material on the wafer.
In general, prior to device fabrication, there are two types of polishing: rough polishing and chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) in which the rough polishing precedes the CMP. Rough polishing is a conventional abrasive process whose primary purpose is to remove the surface damage leftover from the wafer-slicing process of diamond saws that created the wafer. CMP follows the rough polishing and is typically a combination of chemical etching and mechanical buffing. During device fabrication, only CMP is used as rough polishing is too abrasive to afford the necessary planarization control.
In a conventional CMP rotary or orbital system, wafers are mounted upside-down on rotating circular holders and lowered onto a polishing pad rotated in the opposite direction. The polishing pad is generally polyurethane or urethane-coated with felt and sits on a pallet. For ridding the surface of irregularities prior to fabrication, a slurry containing silica suspended in a mild etchant such as potassium or ammonium hydroxide is added to the polishing pad. A thin layer of silicon dioxide chemically grows on the surface of the wafer as a result of contact with the alkaline slurry. This layer is continuously removed mechanically by the buffing action of the polishing pad. The process generally reduces the irregularities of the wafer to a small percentage of the wafer diameter over the entire surface of the wafer. For planarization during processing, e.g. planarizing to flatten the wafer profile in multi-metal interconnection schemes, the CMP apparatus must remove oxides and various metals in addition to any planarizing material and/or wafer material.
To achieve the necessary precision without polishing away the active circuitry, a number of variables in any CMP apparatus can be controlled. For example, the numerous diverse variables that can be controlled include: composition of the slurry, rate of feed or introduction of the slurry to the pad, pad characteristics (both the pad material and the condition of the pad), polishing time, rotational speed of both the pad and wafer, and pressure of the wafer on the pad. The slurry characteristics to be controlled include the particulate size and pH of the etchant solution. In addition, slurries are chosen to balance chemical removal with abrasiveness so that the production rate of wafers through the CMP apparatus is acceptable (as is the planarity of the resultant wafer).
More recently, some current CMP systems/modules have eschewed conventional slurries as described above, turning to fixed abrasive polishing instead. To date, a number of forms of fixed abrasives exist. Materials are produced either as a roll or as a fixed pad. The roll is slowly and continuously fed into a CMP module, while the fixed pad is applied to the conventional rotary or orbital system. At least one of the problems with these current fixed-abrasive CMP systems is similar to that of more-conventional slurry-type systems; a high cost of ownership of the system for the user. Additional problems include both inconsistent results of the fixed abrasive as the abrasive wears away due to usage and reliance on third-party produced consumable abrasive or slurry material.
To solve these problems, an arrangement containing a modified fixed abrasive material and method of using the same has been developed using a pre-patterned substrate onto which the fixed abrasive is disposed.
A first aspect of the present invention is directed towards a method of fixed abrasive substitute preparation and use. The method entails providing a substrate having a predetermined three-dimensional pattern and introducing a coating of an abrasive, an abrasive and binder, or an abrasive/binder mixture to the surface of the substrate. The coating coats the pattern on the surface of the substrate. A semiconductor wafer is planarized to a desired uniformity by the interaction of coated substrate and the semiconductor wafer.
In one embodiment, the method may include patterning the substrate prior to introducing the coating to the surface of the substrate. Introducing the coating to the surface of the substrate may include vacuum depositing the coating on the surface of the substrate. Similarly, the method may include a curing process enabling curing of the binder such that the abrasive better adheres to the surface of the semiconductor.
In other embodiments, the method may include stripping the substrate of remaining abrasive subsequent to planarizing semiconductors wafers. The stripping of the abrasive occurs in cleaning chamber and the substrate is subsequently transferred to a deposition chamber in which the substrate is re-coated with the coating to which new semiconductor wafers requiring planarization may be applied.
A second aspect is directed towards an apparatus for preparation and use of a polishing substrate. The apparatus comprises a substrate having a plurality of predetermined patterns of different three-dimensional shapes in which a base of each of the plurality patterns is disposed along substantially the same plane, a coating layer is coated on a surface of the substrate, a vacuum deposition chamber that is configured to receive the substrate and in which the coating layer is applied to the surface of the substrate and a chemical-mechanical polishing chamber is disposed downstream from the vacuum deposition chamber and configured to
The pattern(s) may be selected from a group consisting of a rectangular pattern, a trapezoidal pattern, a hemispherical pattern, a pillar pattern and a prismatic pattern. The pattern(s) may have a maximum height of about 20 μm to about 50 μm and a maximum width of about 100 μm to about 1000 μm. The pattern(s) may have a density of 60-95%. An area of the coating layer that is exposed as a fixed consumable may remain constant with planarization usage.
It is therefore an advantage of the present invention to increase the reliability and decrease the cost of a CMP system by providing an arrangement and method to better control the amount of abrasive material used during planarization of a semiconductor wafer. An additional advantage of the present invention is the improvement in process control of the planarization of the semiconductor wafer.
The following figures and detailed description of the preferred embodiments will more clearly demonstrate these and other objects and advantages of the invention.
The substrate 1 is made of a durable material that is suitable for use in a standard vacuum deposition process. Examples of typical materials include, but are not limited to, ceramic, rigid plastic or other rigid material such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET). The substrate is generally purchased from a vendor of the particular material that comprises the substrate.
The substrate pattern is a three-dimensional topographical pattern that may be prepared by a number of different methods, including physically or chemically etching the substrate to form the pattern or depositing the pattern on the substrate via a deposition process. In the latter case, i.e. deposition, the pattern may be formed of either the same material as the substrate or a different material that is maintained on the substrate through repeated deposition of abrasive on the substrate and cleaning of the substrate by removal of the abrasive remaining on the substrate after numerous planarizations. In addition, the pattern on a substrate may be altered as desired by re-patterning the substrate. This may be accomplished by stripping (or partially stripping) the substrate of the prior pattern, cleaning the substrate and re-etching or re-depositing pattern material on the substrate. Although either chemical means (e.g. chemical etching) or mechanical means (e.g. grinding, mechanical etching) may be used to strip a prior pattern from the substrate, chemical means are generally used to clean the substrate, either when removing the abrasive or after stripping the prior pattern.
The substrate pattern 3 is selected such that die-level and/or wafer-level planarization is optimized when the abrasive-coated substrate pattern 2 is applied to a desired semiconductor wafer to be planarized. The shape of the substrate pattern 3 is particularly important for maintaining stability in the chemical-mechanical polishing process. A general objective is to select a pattern that will enable chemical transport of slurry or other fluid-based chemistry to the wafer/substrate interface and reaction by-product away from the substrate. One advantage of using a predetermined pattern is that the density of the pattern (both the number of shapes/unit area on the substrate and the amount of pattern/unit area on the substrate) is preset, thus allowing the user to select a pattern to best suit the processing needs for a particular wafer by increasing control over the planarization process. One suitable range of pattern density is from 60% to 95%. In addition to pattern density, the specific pattern profile, i.e. shape, may be selected. For example, in some cases the surface area of the fixed abrasive that contacts the surface of the semiconductor wafer during polishing may be desired to be constant for predictability and reliability reasons. One preferred shape having a constant cross-section is a pillar-like shape. Examples of typical pillar-like patterns with constant surface area with wear are shown in
Other patterns may also be used in which the surface area does not remain constant with usage as shown in
Patterns having increasing surface area during usage may be used where a high degree of surfacing with a smaller abrasive contact area is initially desired and subsequently the benefit of a larger abrasive contact area is desired during polishing/planarization of the semiconductor wafer. Alternatively, a combination of patterns with constant and increasing surface area may be used, as illustrated in FIG. 6. In this embodiment, the substrate having a combination of patterns may be used where one type of pattern enables another type of pattern to achieve a desired result or enhances the result obtained by another type of pattern. For example, assuming only two types of patterns, pattern A and pattern B, exist on the substrate, pattern A may enable activation of the material surface, say via chemistry of an alkali slurry, while patter B may remove the activated material. In this embodiment, pattern A preferably has a smaller surface area (locally) than pattern B. Patter A would then provide a higher pressure to the wafer surface than pattern B and allow chemical action to occur on the wafer, and the lower pressure imparted by pattern B would act to remove activated material.
Although specific dimensions may vary, in any of the above patterns, either those having constant or increasing cross-sectional area, typical features of a particular shape might be a maximum height (as measured from the base and shown in
The process by which the substrate having a predetermined pattern is coated and used will be described with respect to
The abrasive of the fixed abrasive/binder mixture may be formed of silica and/or other materials such as ceria, manganese oxide or similar earth-metal oxide material of appropriate hardness. In one embodiment, the particles that comprise the abrasive may range in size from 0.1 μm to 3.0 μm. The binder allows the abrasive to adhere to the substrate. The binder may be made from any of several conventional binding mixtures such as organic polymers. Of course, alternate processes may be used as well, such as individual deposition of the binder material and the abrasive material or deposition of the abrasive material without the binder material. If the abrasive material is deposited without a separate binder material, the abrasive may adhere with enough strength to allow planarization of a semiconductor wafer or a curing process performed by a cure mechanism (described below) may be applied to the substrate prior to planarization of the semiconductor wafer.
Following the deposition, the substrate and fixed abrasive/binder mixture combination may be annealed or subjected to a curing process if necessary. The curing process sets the binder to more firmly adhere the abrasive to the substrate and may be performed either in-situ with the deposition process or ex-situ, in a separate cure mechanism. This is to say that, if the curing process is performed in situ, the substrate remains in the deposition chamber 50 at atmospheric pressure or less and annealing is performed by the cure mechanism in a range of temperatures between room temperature (approximately 20° C.) and the material melting point (typically >150° C.), depending on the particular binder used. The curing process can also be performed ex-situ, in which case the substrate and fixed abrasive/binder mixture combination is removed from the deposition chamber 50 and annealed in an ambient atmosphere and temperature depending on the particular binder used. In this case, the substrate may be annealed in a separate cure mechanism, such as a conventional annealing apparatus.
Subsequent to the deposition and/or curing process, the substrate is transferred to a CMP system, such as the TERES polishing system available from Lam Research Corp., Fremont, Calif. As described previously, the substrate may either be prepared as a roll or a fixed pad. Thus, the substrate having the fixed abrasive may be in a fixed pad/wafer-type form or a continuous roll, and is used to polish and/or planarize semiconductor wafers introduced to the CMP system. The fixed pad-type substrate is applied to a rotary or orbital CMP system 100, as shown in
After the abrasive coating on the loaded substrate 110 has eroded by wear to a preset amount, the substrate 110 is unloaded and may be placed in a reclaim magazine 160. The reclaim magazine 160 is filled with at least one eroded substrate and subsequently transferred from the application chamber 130 to a cleaning chamber 170. Although depicted in-situ in
As depicted in
After the etch process is complete, the chamber is vented back to atmosphere and the substrate is removed. This is to say that, subsequent to cleaning, the stripped substrate (indicated by dashes) containing the original predetermined pattern is then transferred to the deposition chamber 50 by a substrate transfer mechanism such as a robot/robotic arm. Note that the substrate, during transfer, may be contained in the reclaim magazine 160, which has a number of cartridges to hold individual substrates. A fresh abrasive/binder mixture is applied to coat the previously denuded substrate. The process for coating the substrate with the abrasive/binder mixture is the same as that described above. As mentioned before, the deposition chamber 50, application chamber 130 and cleaning chamber 170 may be individual modules, or may be integral parts of the entire CMP system 100.
The use of the present invention has advantages, one of which is a lower cost of ownership for the owner of the CMP system as purchase of external manufactured consumables (pads, etc . . . ) from third party sources are reduced/replaced by purchase of (lower cost) raw materials. In addition, this invention allows control of the abrasiveness of the pad by allowing pattern characteristics such as pattern density, shape and size to be predetermined and/or modified. Further, the present invention permits the user to set the desired abrasive characteristics such as abrasiveness and thickness of the coating as desired, thus allowing an even finer control of planarization.
Alternately, rather than applying fixed abrasive to the surface of the patterned substrate, other materials may be applied. For example, a non-abrasive pad-type material may be introduced to the surface of the substrate. The pad-type material may be polyurethane or other suitable compound, similar to the material of conventional pads used in standard planarization processes. The method of introducing the material to the pre-patterned substrate would be similar to that above, e.g. depositing and adhering (if necessary) the pad-type material on the surface of the substrate, applying the coated substrate to at least one semiconductor wafer requiring planarization, stripping the pad-type material after the pad-type material is sufficiently eroded (i.e. cleaning the substrate), replacing the pad-type material, and reusing the pad-type material. As above, the particular material used determines the specifics of the process, e.g. atmospheres, timing, and temperatures during processing. In this case, however, as the abrasives are not fixed, conventional slurries may be used during planarization of semiconductor wafers, having replaced the conventional pad with the pre-patterned substrate coated with the pad-type material of the present invention. Substrates prepared with standard pad coatings would then be usable with abrasive slurries commonly available in the CMP industry.
While the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments, the description is illustrative of the invention and not to be construed as limiting the invention. Various modifications and applications may occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 09/609,590 filed on Jun. 30, 2000 U.S. Pat. No. 6,495,464 issued Dec. 17, 2002 entitled “Method And Apparatus For Fixed Abrasive Substrate Preparation And Use In A Cluster CMP Tool,” by John Boyd and Michael Lacy. The entire disclosure of this application is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3753269 | Budman | Aug 1973 | A |
4318250 | Klievoneit et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4510113 | Takano et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4576612 | Shukla et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4672985 | Mohr | Jun 1987 | A |
4720939 | Simpson et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4728552 | Jensen, Jr. | Mar 1988 | A |
4753838 | Kimura et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4841680 | Hoffstein et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4927432 | Budinger et al. | May 1990 | A |
4934102 | Leach et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4954141 | Takiyama et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4962562 | Englund et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5020283 | Tuttle | Jun 1991 | A |
5081051 | Mattingly et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5104421 | Takizawa et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5177908 | Tuttle | Jan 1993 | A |
5197999 | Thomas | Mar 1993 | A |
5212910 | Breivogel et al. | May 1993 | A |
5234867 | Schultz et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5257478 | Hyde et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5287663 | Pierce et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5329734 | Yu | Jul 1994 | A |
5335453 | Baldy et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5433651 | Lustig et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5484323 | Smith | Jan 1996 | A |
5487697 | Jensen | Jan 1996 | A |
5489233 | Cook et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5531635 | Mogi et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5534106 | Cote et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5536202 | Appel et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5547417 | Breivogel et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5558568 | Talieh et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5575707 | Talieh et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578362 | Reinhardt et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5593344 | Weldon et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5605760 | Roberts | Feb 1997 | A |
5611943 | Cadien et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5622526 | Phillips | Apr 1997 | A |
5643044 | Lund | Jul 1997 | A |
5655951 | Meikle et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5692947 | Talieh et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5692950 | Rutherford et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5692958 | Tseng | Dec 1997 | A |
5725417 | Robinson | Mar 1998 | A |
5759918 | Hoshizaki et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5762536 | Pant et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5779526 | Gill | Jul 1998 | A |
5810964 | Shiraishi | Sep 1998 | A |
5871390 | Pant et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5897426 | Somekh | Apr 1999 | A |
5899798 | Trojan et al. | May 1999 | A |
5908530 | Hoshizaki et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5958794 | Bruxvoort et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6206759 | Agarwal et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207005 | Henley et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6416616 | Walker | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6495464 | Boyd et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6595831 | Hirokawa et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6620032 | Chopra | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6733615 | Boyd et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 738 561 | Oct 1996 | EP |
0 824995 | Feb 1998 | EP |
0 893 203 | Jan 1999 | EP |
63-267155 | Feb 1989 | JP |
8-187798 | Nov 1996 | JP |
WO 9835785 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9836442 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9845090 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 99 06182 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 9922908 | May 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030036274 A1 | Feb 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09609590 | Jun 2000 | US |
Child | 10255403 | US |