The invention generally relates to crystal growth. More particularly, the invention relates to methods and apparatus for growing crystalline ribbons of semiconductors materials.
Silicon sheet material or ribbon is particularly important in making low cost solar cells. Continuous growth of silicon ribbon obviates the need for slicing of bulk produced silicon to form wafers. In U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,594,229; 4,627,887; 4,661,200; 4,689,109; 6,090,199; 6,200,383; and 6,217,649, continuous silicon ribbon growth is carried out by introducing two strings of high temperature material up through a crucible that includes a shallow layer of molten silicon. The strings serve to stabilize the edges of the growing ribbon. The molten silicon freezes into a solid ribbon just above the molten layer. U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,090,199 and 6,217,649 describe a method and apparatus for continuous replenishment of the feedstock material in a continuous silicon ribbon. As presently practiced, a single ribbon is grown out of a single crucible, with each ribbon machine having one such crucible.
In order to produce lower cost solar cells and hence expand large-scale electrical applications of solar electricity, it is important to have lower cost substrate materials for making the solar cell. The current invention provides new and improved methods and apparatus for growing silicon ribbons.
Methods and apparatus for concurrent growth of multiple ribbons from a single crucible have been developed. These techniques allow for efficient and low cost growth of silicon solar cell manufacturing.
In one aspect, the invention features a method for continuously growing multiple semiconductor ribbons concurrently in a single crucible. A crucible is provided that has multiple meniscus shapers that are disposed in a spaced relationship. A melt is formed in the crucible from a semiconductor material. The multiple meniscus shapers separate the melt into a plurality of distinct melt subregions. Multiple pairs of strings are arranged relative to the multiple meniscus shapers. Each pair of strings (i) has a fixed distance therebetween, (ii) emerges from one of the distinct melt subregions, and (iii) defines a pair of edges of a meniscus and controls the width of a ribbon. The multiple pairs of strings are continuously pulled away from a surface of the melt to form multiple discrete and substantially flat semiconductor ribbons.
In another aspect, the invention features a method for minimizing interference due to meniscus interactions between adjacent ribbons in a multiple semiconductor ribbon growth system. A melt is formed from a semiconductor material disposed in an open crucible. The melt is partitioned into a plurality of distinct melt subregions by disposing a plurality of meniscus shapers in the crucible. Each melt subregion has a distinct melt surface defined by a meniscus shaper. Multiple semiconductor ribbons are continuously grown from the crucible. Each of the ribbons is grown from a melt subregion by pulling a pair of spaced strings away from a distinct melt surface.
In yet another aspect, the invention features an apparatus for continuously growing multiple semiconductor ribbons concurrently in a single crucible. The apparatus includes a crucible for holding a melt of a semiconductor material; multiple meniscus shapers arranged in a spaced relationship in the crucible to partition the melt into a plurality of distinct melt subregions; multiple pairs of strings; and multiple afterheaters. Each pair of strings is disposed relative to one of the multiple meniscus shapers. Each pair of strings (i) has a fixed distance therebetween, (ii) emerges from one of the melt subregions, (iii) defines a pair of edges of a meniscus, and (iv) defines a width of one of the multiple semiconductor string ribbons as the pair of strings is pulled from the melt subregion. Each afterheater is disposed adjacent a surface of at least one of the semiconductor string ribbons to control the thermal profiles of the semiconductor string ribbons.
The invention features techniques for the continuous and concurrent growth of multiple semiconductor ribbons from a single crucible, i.e., from one crystal growth machine. The method and apparatus described herein allow for a substantially increased production rate and efficiency and a substantial decrease in capital, material, and labor costs associated with the ribbon growth process by a factor that is virtually equal to the number of ribbons produced per machine. For example, using a double ribbon growth system in which two ribbons are concurrently grown in the same crucible reduces by half the costs associated with the process (except for the feedstock silicon and string). In addition, the output measured in terms of amount of ribbon area per unit time, i.e., the so-called areal output, can be substantially increased, allowing large scale production in a short time without requiring additional equipment.
In one aspect, the invention generally relates to a method for continuously growing multiple semiconductor ribbons concurrently in a single crucible. Two principal factors connected with growing multiple string ribbons from a single crucible are (1) the uniformity of thermal gradient from ribbon to ribbon and possible asymmetries associated with multiple ribbon growth and (2) meniscus interactions between the adjacent ribbons. The methods and apparatus of the invention take into consideration each of these factors to allow concurrent growth of multiple ribbons that are discrete and substantially flat in a single crucible. In the growth of a silicon ribbon, the silicon is subjected to vertical thermal gradients on the order of several hundred ° C./cm as it cools from its melting temperature of about 1412° C. The lack of ductility in silicon and the non-zero second derivative of the cooling curve can result in large stresses in the ribbon and make it difficult to grow a flat and wide ribbon.
Some of the stress is relieved by the formations of dislocations in the crystal structure and/or by buckling growth out of the ribbon plane. Buckling of ribbon results in non-flat ribbons, which are undesirable for solar cell applications. To facilitate flat ribbon growth, the cooling profile (measured along the growth axis) can be tailored to minimize the stress, such as by using an afterheater (sometimes called a radiation shield). U.S. Pat. No. 4,627,887, FIG. 13A, shows an example of radiation shields. The afterheater design can also influence the residual stress in the grown ribbon. Lower stress ribbons can typically be processed with higher yields.
A conventional string ribbon growth method is shown in
For multiple ribbon growth from a single crucible, there is a geometric asymmetry that leads to a thermal asymmetry in the radiative flux, as discussed below.
The cross-sectional view of the system shown in
An embodiment of the multi-ribbon growth system according to the invention is illustrated in
The spacing between the shapers may be varied to fit a particular application. Without wishing to be bound by the theory below, the closest spacing for the meniscus shapers for multiple ribbon growth may be determined according to the following analysis. Based on the angle of attachment of the liquid silicon to the growing ribbon is constant at about 11°, and the density and surface tension of liquid silicon, as well as an estimate of the height of the interface above the free melt surface, it is possible to numerically integrate the governing equation (Laplace's equation, below) and step along the meniscus surface for the desired lateral distance. Successive iterations are performed until the required boundary conditions are met.
Laplace's equation: p=Υ(1/R1+1/R2)
where: p is the pressure drop across the interface, Υ is surface tension, and R1 and R2 are principal radii of curvature
This technique yields a family of curves for meniscus shapes as a function of the dual ribbon spacing as illustrated in
In one exemplary embodiment, 8 mm wide meniscus shapers or 4 mm on the half-width scale as shown in
The configurations of the pairs of strings may be such that the ribbons are grown, for example, in a face-to-face pattern as illustrated in
The multiple miniscus shapers may be identical in shape and size or different in shape and/or size. The multiple pairs of strings may also have different distances between the strings within a pair, thereby allowing concurrent growth of ribbons of different sizes. The ribbons are typically grown, i.e., pulled, in a direction perpendicular to or substantially perpendicular to the melt surface from where the ribbon is grown. Other growth directions, e.g., angled pulling of strings, may be employed in certain growth systems to achieve the desired ribbon specifications.
The number of ribbons that can be grown from a single crucible may be varied according to the applications. In one embodiment, as shown in
In another aspect, the invention features a method for minimizing interference between adjacent ribbons in a multiple semiconductor ribbon growth system. In one exemplary embodiment and referring again to
Similarly in
It has now been discovered that ribbon growth is not affected by a geometrical asymmetry in the radiative thermal environment as produced, for example, by having an afterheater only on one side of the ribbon. The thermal resistance of the ribbon through its thickness is so low that symmetry of the radiative environment is not required. Thus, the radiative flux on either side of a growing ribbon can be asymmetric and still allow for successful growth of flat ribbons. This observation is of particular significance for a two-ribbon system as each ribbon “sees” an identical radiative environment.
An important aspect of the invention is that growth of many ribbons from a single crucible results in a thermal environment for all the inner ribbons, excluding the two outer ribbons, that is extremely uniform in time. The uniformity in time can be particularly valuable, as it is well known to one skilled in the art that deposits of silicon oxide or silicon carbyoxide can build up over time on the afterheaters and thereby affect their radiative properties. This in turn can result in changes in the thermal profile that can make it more difficult to achieve the growth of flat, low stress ribbon.
The invention also features an apparatus for continuously growing multiple semiconductor ribbons concurrently in a single crucible. Exemplary embodiments of the apparatus are depicted in
Referring again to
Referring again to
A housing is typically included to isolate from the ambient environment the melt and a portion of the solidifying ribbon, especially the solid-liquid interface and any part of the ribbon having a temperature of 400° C. or higher. The housing is typically filled with an inert gas, e.g., Argon.
Sheet materials or ribbons of materials that may be grown using the methods and apparatus discussed herein include, e.g., silicon, germanium, silicon carbide, gallium arsenide, gallium phosphide, indium arsenide, gallium antimonide, indium antimonide, indium phosphide, gallium arsenide antimonide, gallium nitride, ternary compounds, and alloys thereof. The methods and apparatus discussed above can be applied in multi-ribbon growth systems where two, three, four or more (e.g., twenty) ribbons are concurrently grown from a single crucible.
Each of the patent documents disclosed hereinabove is incorporated in its entirety by reference herein. Variations, modifications, and other implementations of what is described herein will occur to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the invention is not to be limited only to the preceding illustrative descriptions.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/284,067 filed on Oct. 30, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,814,802, which is owned by the assignee of the instant application and the entire disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3031403 | Bennett, Jr. | Apr 1962 | A |
3058915 | Bennett | Oct 1962 | A |
3096158 | Gaulé et al. | Jul 1963 | A |
3298795 | Hamilton et al. | Jan 1967 | A |
3795488 | Oliver | Mar 1974 | A |
3980438 | Castonguay et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4036595 | Lorenzini et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4221754 | Nowak | Sep 1980 | A |
4427638 | Ellis et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4469552 | Thornhill | Sep 1984 | A |
4510015 | Ellis et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4512954 | Matsui | Apr 1985 | A |
4577588 | Mautref et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4861416 | Morrison | Aug 1989 | A |
4936947 | Mackintosh | Jun 1990 | A |
5098229 | Meier et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5242667 | Koziol et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5370078 | Kou et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5690732 | Otani et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5723337 | Muller et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5911826 | Hiraishi et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 390 502 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0 170 856 | Sep 1991 | EP |
0 875 606 | Nov 1998 | EP |
53073481 | Jun 1978 | JP |
58194798 | Nov 1983 | JP |
59182293 | Oct 1984 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050051080 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10284067 | Oct 2002 | US |
Child | 10942475 | US |