The present invention relates generally to semiconductor manufacture, and more particularly to polishing a substrate assembly surface using a chemical-mechanical-polishing (CMP) pad.
In microchip fabrication, integrated circuits are formed on a substrate assembly. By substrate assembly, it is meant to include a bare wafer, as well as a wafer having one or more layers of material formed on it. Such layers are patterned to produce devices (e.g., transistors, diodes, capacitors, interconnects, etc.) for integrated circuits. In forming these devices, the one or more patterned layers can result in topographies of various heights.
In patterning layers on a wafer or patterning trenches in a wafer, lithography is used to transfer an image on a mask to a surface of the substrate assembly. Lithography (“microlithography” or “photolithography”) has resolution limits based in part on depth of focus requirements. These limits become more critical as geometries are diminished. Thus, to have a target surface area of a substrate assembly in focus for lithographic patterning, it is necessary that the target surface area be sufficiently planar for the lithography employed. However, topographies of various heights make planarity problematic.
One approach to obtaining sufficient planarity is using a chemical-mechanical-polishing (CMP) process. CMP may be used to remove unwanted material, and more particularly, may be employed to planarize a surface area of a substrate assembly. In removing unwanted material, it is important to remove as little wanted material as possible. Thus, chemical solutions used in CMP are often formulated to be more selective to remove one material over another, and thus the solution's chemical composition is directed at removing different materials at different rates. One such solution, Rodel ILD1300 made by Rodel, Inc. of Newark, Del., has a four to one (4:1) selectivity of boro-phospho-silicate glass (BPSG) to a doped silicon oxide formed from tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) [hereinafter the doped silicon oxide formed from TEOS is referred to as “TEOS”]. Rodel ILD1300 also has a twelve to one (12:1) selectivity of BPSG to nitride. Conventionally, improvements in CMP selectivity between silicon nitride and BPSG/TEOS, polysilicon and BPSG/TEOS, or tungsten and titanium nitride have been made by changing chemical composition of the solution, such as by varying pH for selectivity to nitride or varying oxidants for selectivity to metal.
In addition to chemical reactions, CMP also includes a mechanical component for removing material. Mechanical removal for CMP is generally described by Preston's equation:
RCMP=KCMPvP (1)
where RCMP is the mechanical removal rate, P is the pressure, v is the relative velocity between a porous polishing pad and a substrate assembly surface, and KCMP is a constant proportional to the coefficient of friction between the pad and the substrate assembly surface. Conventionally, P is 20,685 to 55,160 Pa(3 to 8 pounds per square inch (psi)) and n is 0.333 to 1.667 rev/s (20 to 100 rpms). KCMP depends on the material(s) being removed.
As direct contact between the pad and the substrate assembly surface reduces removal rate owing to an absence of CMP solution, porous pads with continuous grooves in concentric ellipses have been made. By porous, it is meant that CMP solution particles may be absorbed within pad material. Such intrinsically porous pads allow for transport of CMP solution particles across raised portions of pads with continuous grooves. Pitch of such grooves or channels is conventionally 0.1 to 2 mm wide. Notably, this approach is directed at removing materials more readily, and not directed at selectively removing a material as between materials.
A non-porous pad is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,489,233 to Cook, et al. In Cook et al., a pad is formed out of a solid uniform polymer sheet. The polymer sheet has no intrinsic ability to absorb CMP solution particles. Such non-porous pads are formed with channels of varying configurations (macro-textured). The raised portions or contact portions of such non-porous pads are roughened (micro-textured) to allow transport of slurry particulate from channel to channel. Notably, such pads may be impregnated with microelements to provide such micro-texturing, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,578,362 to Reinhardt, et al.
In Cook et al., it is suggested that polishing rates may be adjusted by changing the pattern and density of the applied micro-texture and macro-texture. However, Cook et al. does not show or describe tailoring selectivity to particular materials. Accordingly, it would be desirable to have a methodology for CMP pad manufacturing which allows a target selectivity to be programmed into a CMP pad for a desired application.
The present invention provides enhanced selectivity in a CMP process by providing a special purpose CMP pad. Such a CMP pad includes at least one predetermined duty cycle of non-contact portions (those surfaces directed toward but not contacting a substrate assembly surface during polishing) to contact portions (those surfaces directed toward and contacting a substrate assembly surface during polishing). Such a CMP pad is formed at least in part from a material that intrinsically is non-porous with respect to a CMP solution particulate to be employed with use of the pad. Furthermore, such a CMP pad may be configured to transport CMP solution particulate across its contact portions. Such a CMP pad alters relative removal rates of materials without altering CMP solution chemical composition.
A duty cycle in accordance with the present invention is provided by configuring a CMP pad with a recessed portion or a raised portion, such as by a recess or an island, to provide a non-contact portion and a contact portion, respectively. A duty cycle or spatial frequency for an arrangement or pattern of islands or recesses is selected to enhance selectivity as between materials to be polished. Accordingly, such a CMP pad may be programmed with a target selectivity by configuring it with a predetermined duty cycle.
CMP pads in accordance with the present invention are to provide improved selectivity over CMP chemical selectivities alone. Such pads may be used to remove one dielectric in the presence of another dielectric, such as one silicon oxide, doped or undoped, in the presence of another siliconoxide, doped or undoped.
Features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiment(s) described below in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings where:
Reference numbers refer to the same or equivalent parts of the present invention throughout the several figures of the drawing.
Though a stop on TEOS CMP planarization process for removal of BPSG embodiment is described in detail herein, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced with other materials, some of which are described elsewhere herein.
Referring to
Referring to
In
Referring to
Notably, wafer carrier 25 may be rotated at one or more speeds, and such rotational speed may be varied during processing to affect material removal rate. It should be understood that it is not necessary to use rotational movement, rather any movement across contact portions and non-contact portions of pad 22 may be used, including but not limited to linear movement.
In
While pad 22 has been shown with radially extending concentric islands and recesses, such configuration is just one embodiment. For example, elliptical, spiral, or transverse (linear) recesses and islands may be employed in accordance with the present invention. Alternatively, discrete islands may be formed on a CMP pad. By way of example and not limitation, such discrete islands may be pillars, pyramids, mesas (including frusticonicals), cones, and like protrusions extending upward from a CMP pad surface. Such discrete islands may be spaced apart to provide at least one predetermined gap between them to provide at least one duty cycle. Such islands may be arranged to form rings, stripes, spirals, or ellipses, among other patterns.
In
While not wishing to be bound by theory, what ensues is an explanation of what is believed to be the theory of operation of pad 22. Because pad 22 is formed with contact and non-contact portions, as well as a non-porous surface 43, it is possible to distinctly separate mechanical and chemical interactions of a CMP process. Therefore, such a CMP pad has both abrasion (contact to a substrate assembly surface with CMP solution particles) regions and hydrolyzation (contact to a substrate assembly surface with CMP solution) regions to remove material. Along surfaces 45, material removal is mostly or completely a mechanical interaction governed by Preston's equation. Along non-contact portions 42, material removal is mostly or completely a chemical interaction governed by the equation:
ROH=KOHƒ[pH] (2)
where ROH is the chemical removal rate, KOH is a hydrolyzation reaction rate constant, and ƒ[pH] is a function dependent on the pH level of CMP solution 23.
The amount of material removed is dependent in part upon the velocity, v, at which substrate assembly is moved across non-contact portions 42 and contact portions 41. For a non-contact portion 42 with a width L1 and an adjacent contact portion 41 with a width L2, the amount of material removed on a pass over L1 and L2 may be mathematically expressed as:
(ROH*L1+RCMP*L2)/v. (3)
For balanced removal between chemical and mechanical removal,
ROH*L1=RCMP*L2. (4)
To illustrate this point for two different materials M1 and M2, a ratio of total material removed in a pass over L1 and L2 may be mathematically expressed as:
where RCMP,M1 and RCMP,M2 are removal rates of non-hydrolyzed materials M1 and M2, respectively.
If, for example, M1 is BPSG and M2 is TEOS, then, if L1>>L2, BPSG to TEOS selectivity is governed by the relative hydrolyzation rates of M1 and M2. Such selectivity may be approximated by an associated wet etch chemistry selectivity. However, if L1<<L2, BPSG to TEOS selectivity is governed by CMP coefficients (i.e., the relative abrasion rates of M1 and M2) and approaches a non-recessed pad selectivity. Therefore, by changing the relationship between L1 and L2, selectivity as between materials may be adjusted, as well as enhancing the relative contribution of removal rates of an etch chemistry.
While the above embodiments have been described in terms of one and two materials, it should be understood that more than two materials may be polished in accordance with the present invention. For example, for m materials, a chemical reaction rate RC and a CMP removal rate RM, Equation 3 may be expressed as:
By way of example,
Pads 50 and 60 have different recess pitches, namely, pitch 54 and pitch 64. For a constant linear velocity 55, relative polishing movement of a substrate assembly 10 (shown in
For the above-mentioned embodiment to remove BPSG and stop on TEOS, approximately a 1 mm contact pitch and approximately a 0.2 mm non-contact pitch were employed. In this embodiment, approximately a 6 to 1 selectivity ratio of selecting BPSG over TEOS was obtained, which is a 50 percent improvement over the prior art. Notably, this selectivity was achieved operating at a speed of 0.75 rev/s (45 rpm). This embodiment provides that TEOS may be removed at a rate in a range of 0.83 to 5.00 nm/s and BPSG may be removed at a rate in a range of 3.33 to 10.00 nm/s to provide a 6 to 1 selectivity ratio.
Contact portions of a CMP pad in accordance with the present invention are directed to mechanical abrasion for material removal, and non-contact portions of the pad act as discrete reactors for chemical reaction, such as hydrolyzation of silicon oxide or oxidation of metal. Owing to forming such a pad with a non-porous surface having a predetermined duty cycle, chemical and mechanical actions to remove materials in a CMP process are separated. Such a predetermined spatial frequency or duty cycle may be provided for enhancing selectively for removing one material over another.
Referring now to
Curve 101 represents an example where diffusion coefficients and abrasion coefficients (e.g., KCMP) are relatively dominant factors in selectivity, such as when two dielectrics are present. More particularly, diffusion coefficient (D) is affected by doping. By way of example and not limitation, BPSG with a 7% P and 3% B doping was selected as M1, and PTEOS with no doping was selected as M2. The ratio of DM1/DM2 for these materials is about 20, and the ratio of KCMP, M1 to KCMP, M2 for these materials is about 4. From the graph of
Curve 102 represents an example where abrasion coefficients and chemical removal rates (e.g., ROH) are relatively dominant factors in selectivity, such as when two dielectrics are present. By way of example and not limitation, HDP oxide was selected as M1, and Si3N4 was selected as M2. The ratio of KCMP, M1 to KCMP, M2 is about 6, and the ratio of ROH, M1 to ROH, M2 is about 100. From the graph of
Curves 103 and 104 represent examples where chemical removal rates, abrasion coefficients, and passivation efficiency (P) are relatively dominant factors in selectivity, such as when two dielectrics or two conductors are present. By way of example and not limitation for curve 103, BPSG was selected as M1, and tungsten (W) was selected as M2. The ratio of KCMP, M1 to KCMP, M2 is about 20, and the ratio of ROH, M1 to ROH, M2 is about a 1000 or greater, as there is no meaningful hydrolyzation of metal. From the graph of
By way of example and not limitation for curve 104, aluminum (Al) was selected as M1, and titanium (Ti) was selected as M2. The ratio of KCMP, M1 to KCMP, M2 is about 10, and the ratio of ROH, M1 to ROH, M2 is about 0.5. Passivation efficiency for Al is about 0.6 and passivation efficiency for Ti is about zero. From the graph of
In accordance with the present invention, by selecting L1 and L2, a CMP pad may be configured to have a target selectivity with respect to removing one or more materials in the presence of one or more other materials. Such a pad may then be placed on a CMP platform (e.g., platen, web, belt, and the like) for more selectively removing one or more materials over one or more other materials from a substrate assembly.
While the present invention has been particularly shown and described with respect to certain embodiment(s) thereof, it should be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that various changes and modifications in form and detail may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as set forth in the appended claims. Accordingly, it is intended that the present invention only be limited by the appended claims.
This application is a Continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 09/800,711 filed on Mar. 7, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,325,702, patent application Ser. No. 09/146,733 filed Sep. 3, 1998, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,203,407 on Mar. 20, 2001
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
816461 | Gorton | Mar 1906 | A |
888129 | Tone | May 1908 | A |
959054 | Glover | May 1910 | A |
1953983 | Benner | Apr 1934 | A |
2242877 | Albertson | May 1941 | A |
2409953 | Pash | Oct 1946 | A |
2653428 | Fuller | Sep 1953 | A |
2749681 | Reidenbach | Jun 1956 | A |
2749683 | Soderman | Jun 1956 | A |
3468079 | Kaufman | Sep 1969 | A |
3495362 | Hillenbrand | Feb 1970 | A |
3517466 | Bouvier | Jun 1970 | A |
3627338 | Thompson | Dec 1971 | A |
4183545 | Daly | Jan 1980 | A |
4244775 | D'Asaro | Jan 1981 | A |
4271640 | Gadbois et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
RE31053 | Firtion et al. | Oct 1982 | E |
4373991 | Banks | Feb 1983 | A |
4603867 | Babb et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4621458 | Smith | Nov 1986 | A |
4663890 | Brandt | May 1987 | A |
4666553 | Blumenfeld et al. | May 1987 | A |
4671851 | Beyer et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4679359 | Suzuki | Jul 1987 | A |
4693036 | Mori | Sep 1987 | A |
4711610 | Riehl | Dec 1987 | A |
4715150 | Takeuchi et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4739589 | Brehm et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4773185 | Taira | Sep 1988 | A |
4789424 | Fornadel et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4811522 | Gill, Jr. | Mar 1989 | A |
4821461 | Holmstrand | Apr 1989 | A |
4843766 | Umeda | Jul 1989 | A |
4918872 | Sato et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5020283 | Tuttle | Jun 1991 | A |
5036015 | Sandhu et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5069002 | Sandhu et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5081796 | Schultz | Jan 1992 | A |
5131190 | Gougouyan | Jul 1992 | A |
5137597 | Curry, II et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5142828 | Curry, II | Sep 1992 | A |
5169491 | Doan | Dec 1992 | A |
5177908 | Tuttle et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5196353 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5209816 | Yu et al. | May 1993 | A |
5216843 | Breivogel et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5222329 | Yu | Jun 1993 | A |
5223734 | Lowrey et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5225034 | Yu et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5232875 | Tuttle et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5234867 | Schultz et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5240552 | Yu et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5244534 | Yu et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5297364 | Tuttle | Mar 1994 | A |
5300155 | Sandhu et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5302233 | Kim et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5314843 | Yu | May 1994 | A |
5318927 | Sandhu et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5329734 | Yu | Jul 1994 | A |
5354490 | Yu et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5380546 | Krishnan | Jan 1995 | A |
5382551 | Thakur et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5394655 | Allen et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5395801 | Doan et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5413941 | Koos et al. | May 1995 | A |
5421769 | Schultz et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5439551 | Meikle et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5441589 | Groswith, III et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5449314 | Meikle et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5487697 | Jensen | Jan 1996 | A |
5489233 | Cook et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5514245 | Doan et al. | May 1996 | A |
5533924 | Stroupe et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540810 | Sandhu et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5558563 | Cote et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5578362 | Reinhardt et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5605760 | Roberts | Feb 1997 | A |
5609718 | Meikle | Mar 1997 | A |
5650039 | Talieh | Jul 1997 | A |
5690540 | Elliott et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5730642 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5984769 | Bennett et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6203407 | Robinson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6325702 | Robinson | Dec 2001 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
679731 | Feb 1964 | CA |
0318135 | May 1988 | EP |
0439124 | Jan 1991 | EP |
1-195.595 | Nov 1959 | FR |
69.34956 | Oct 1969 | FR |
26287 | Jan 1906 | GB |
2043501 | Feb 1979 | GB |
62099072 | Aug 1987 | JP |
1206067 | Feb 1984 | RU |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020072302 A1 | Jun 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09146733 | Sep 1998 | US |
Child | 09800711 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09800711 | Mar 2001 | US |
Child | 09961624 | US |