Patent Grant
8585678
1. Field of the Invention
This invention pertains generally to medical device systems and methods for intra aortic fluid delivery into regions of the body. More specifically, it is related to intra aortic renal fluid delivery systems and methods.
2. Description of Related Art
Many different medical device systems and methods have been previously disclosed for locally delivering fluids or other agents into various body regions, including body lumens such as vessels, or other body spaces such as organs or heart chambers. Local “fluid” delivery systems may include drugs or other agents, or may even include locally delivering the body's own fluids, such as artificially enhanced blood transport (e.g. either entirely within the body such as directing or shunting blood from one place to another, or in extracorporeal modes such as via external blood pumps etc.). Local “agent” delivery systems are herein generally intended to relate to introduction of a foreign composition as an agent into the body, which may include drug or other useful or active agent, and may be in a fluid form or other form such as gels, solids, powders, gases, etc. It is to be understood that reference to only one of the terms fluid, drug, or agent with respect to local delivery descriptions may be made variously in this disclosure for illustrative purposes, but is not generally intended to be exclusive or omissive of the others; they are to be considered interchangeable where appropriate according to one of ordinary skill unless specifically described to be otherwise.
In general, local agent delivery systems and methods are often used for the benefit of achieving relatively high, localized concentrations of agent where injected within the body in order to maximize the intended effects there and while minimizing unintended peripheral effects of the agent elsewhere in the body. Where a particular dose of a locally delivered agent may be efficacious for an intended local effect, the same dose systemically delivered would be substantially diluted throughout the body before reaching the same location. The agent's intended local effect is equally diluted and efficacy is compromised. Thus systemic agent delivery requires higher dosing to achieve the required localized dose for efficacy, often resulting in compromised safety due to for example systemic reactions or side effects of the agent as it is delivered and processed elsewhere throughout the body other than at the intended target.
Various diagnostic systems and procedures have been developed using local delivery of dye (e.g. radiopaque “contrast” agent) or other diagnostic agents, wherein an external monitoring system is able to gather important physiological information based upon the diagnostic agent's movement or assimilation in the body at the location of delivery and/or at other locations affected by the delivery site. Angiography is one such practice using a hollow, tubular angiography catheter for locally injecting radiopaque dye into a blood chamber or vessel, such as for example coronary arteries in the case of coronary angiography, or in a ventricle in the case of cardiac ventriculography.
Other systems and methods have been disclosed for locally delivering therapeutic agent into a particular body tissue within a patient via a body lumen. For example, angiographic catheters of the type just described above, and other similar tubular delivery catheters, have also been disclosed for use in locally injecting treatment agents through their delivery lumens into such body spaces within the body. More detailed examples of this type include local delivery of thrombolytic drugs such as TPA™, heparin, cumadin, or urokinase into areas of existing clot or thrombogenic implants or vascular injury. In addition, various balloon catheter systems have also been disclosed for local administration of therapeutic agents into target body lumens or spaces, and in particular associated with blood vessels. More specific previously disclosed of this type include balloons with porous or perforated walls that elute drug agents through the balloon wall and into surrounding tissue such as blood vessel walls. Yet further examples for localized delivery of therapeutic agents include various multiple balloon catheters that have spaced balloons that are inflated to engage a lumen or vessel wall in order to isolate the intermediate catheter region from in-flow or out-flow across the balloons. According to these examples, a fluid agent delivery system is often coupled to this intermediate region in order to fill the region with agent such as drug that provides an intended effect at the isolated region between the balloons.
The diagnosis or treatment of many different types of medical conditions associated with various different systems, organs, and tissues, may also benefit from the ability to locally deliver fluids or agents in a controlled manner. In particular, various conditions related to the renal system would benefit a great deal from an ability to locally deliver of therapeutic, prophylactic, or diagnostic agents into the renal arteries.
Acute renal failure (“ARF”) is an abrupt decrease in the kidney's ability to excrete waste from a patient's blood. This change in kidney function may be attributable to many causes. A traumatic event, such as hemorrhage, gastrointestinal fluid loss, or renal fluid loss without proper fluid replacement may cause the patient to go into ARF. Patients may also become vulnerable to ARF after receiving anesthesia, surgery, or a-adrenergic agonists because of related systemic or renal vasoconstriction. Additionally, systemic vasodilation caused by anaphylaxis, and anti-hypertensive drugs, sepsis or drug overdose may also cause ARF because the body's natural defense is to shut down, i.e., vasoconstrict, non-essential organs such as the kidneys. Reduced cardiac output caused by cardiogenic shock, congestive heart failure, pericardial tamponade or massive pulmonary embolism creates an excess of fluid in the body, which can exacerbate congestive heart failure. For example, a reduction in blood flow and blood pressure in the kidneys due to reduced cardiac output can in turn result in the retention of excess fluid in the patient's body, leading, for example, to pulmonary and systemic edema.
Previously known methods of treating ARF, or of treating acute renal insufficiency associated with congestive heart failure (“CHF”), involve administering drugs. Examples of such drugs that have been used for this purpose include, without limitation: vasodilators, including for example papavarine, fenoldopam mesylate, calcium-channel blockers, atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), acetylcholine, nifedipine, nitroglycerine, nitroprusside, adenosine, dopamine, and theophylline; antioxidants, such as for example acetylcysteine; and diuretics, such as for example mannitol, or furosemide. However, many of these drugs, when administered in systemic doses, have undesirable side effects. Additionally, many of these drugs would not be helpful in treating other causes of ARF. While a septic shock patient with profound systemic vasodilation often has concomitant severe renal vasoconstriction, administering vasodilators to dilate the renal artery to a patient suffering from systemic vasodilation would compound the vasodilation system wide. In addition, for patients with severe CHF (e.g., those awaiting heart transplant), mechanical methods, such as hemodialysis or left ventricular assist devices, may be implemented. Surgical device interventions, such as hemodialysis, however, generally have not been observed to be highly efficacious for long-term management of CHF. Such interventions would also not be appropriate for many patients with strong hearts suffering from ARF.
The renal system in many patients may also suffer from a particular fragility, or otherwise general exposure, to potentially harmful effects of other medical device interventions. For example, the kidneys as one of the body's main blood filtering tools may suffer damage from exposed to high density radiopaque contrast dye, such as during coronary, cardiac, or neuro angiography procedures. One particularly harmful condition known as “radiocontrast nephropathy” or “RCN” is often observed during such procedures, wherein an acute impairment of renal function follows exposure to such radiographic contrast materials, typically resulting in a rise in serum creatinine levels of more than 25% above baseline, or an absolute rise of 0.5 mg/dl within 48 hours. Therefore, in addition to CHF, renal damage associated with RCN is also a frequently observed cause of ARF. In addition, the kidneys' function is directly related to cardiac output and related blood pressure into the renal system. These physiological parameters, as in the case of CHF, may also be significantly compromised during a surgical intervention such as an angioplasty, coronary artery bypass, valve repair or replacement, or other cardiac interventional procedure. Therefore, the various drugs used to treat patients experiencing ARF associated with other conditions such as CHF have also been used to treat patients afflicted with ARF as a result of RCN. Such drugs would also provide substantial benefit for treating or preventing ARF associated with acutely compromised hemodynamics to the renal system, such as during surgical interventions.
There would be great advantage therefore from an ability to locally deliver such drugs into the renal arteries, in particular when delivered contemporaneous with surgical interventions, and in particular contemporaneous with radiocontrast dye delivery. However, many such procedures are done with medical device systems, such as using guiding catheters or angiography catheters having outer dimensions typically ranging between about 4 French to about 12 French, and ranging generally between about 6 French to about 8 French in the case of guide catheter systems for delivering angioplasty or stent devices into the coronary or neurovascular arteries (e.g. carotid arteries). These devices also are most typically delivered to their respective locations for use (e.g. coronary ostia) via a percutaneous, translumenal access in the femoral arteries and retrograde delivery upstream along the aorta past the region of the renal artery ostia. A Seldinger access technique to the femoral artery involves relatively controlled dilation of a puncture hole to minimize the size of the intruding window through the artery wall, and is a preferred method where the profiles of such delivery systems are sufficiently small. Otherwise, for larger systems a “cut-down” technique is used involving a larger, surgically made access window through the artery wall.
Accordingly, an intra aortic renal agent delivery system for contemporaneous use with other retrogradedly delivered medical device systems, such as of the types just described above, would preferably be adapted to allow for such interventional device systems, in particular of the types and dimensions just described, to pass upstream across the renal artery ostia (a) while the agent is being delivered into the renal arteries, and (b) while allowing blood to flow downstream across the renal artery ostia, and (c) in an overall cooperating system that allows for Seldinger femoral artery access. Each one of these features (a), (b), or (c), or any sub-combination thereof, would provide significant value to patient treatment; an intra aortic renal delivery system providing for the combination of all three features is so much the more valuable.
Notwithstanding the clear needs for and benefits that would be gained from such intra aortic drug delivery into the renal system, the ability to do so presents unique challenges as follows.
In one regard, the renal arteries extend from respective ostia along the abdominal aorta that are significantly spaced apart from each other circumferentially around the relatively very large aorta. Often, these renal artery ostia are also spaced from each other longitudinally along the aorta with relative superior and inferior locations. This presents a unique challenge to deliver drugs or other agents into the renal system on the whole, which requires both kidneys to be fed through these separate respective arteries via their uniquely positioned and substantially spaced apart ostia. This becomes particularly important where both kidneys may be equally at risk, or are equally compromised, during an invasive upstream procedure—or, of course, for any other indication where both kidneys require renal drug delivery. Thus, an appropriate intra aortic delivery system for such indications would preferably be adapted to feed multiple renal arteries perfusing both kidneys.
In another regard, mere delivery of an agent into the natural, physiologic blood flow path of the aorta upstream of the kidneys may provide some beneficial, localized renal delivery versus other systemic delivery methods, but various undesirable results still arise. In particular, the high flow aorta immediately washes much of the delivered agent beyond the intended renal artery ostia. This reduces the amount of agent actually perfusing the renal arteries with reduced efficacy, and thus also produces unwanted loss of the agent into other organs and tissues in the systemic circulation (with highest concentrations directly flowing into downstream circulation).
In still a further regard, various known types of tubular local delivery catheters, such as angiographic catheters, other “end-hole” catheters, or otherwise, may be positioned with their distal agent perfusion ports located within the renal arteries themselves for delivering agents there, such as via a percutaneous translumenal procedure via the femoral arteries (or from other access points such as brachial arteries, etc.). However, such a technique may also provide less than completely desirable results.
For example, such seating of the delivery catheter distal tip within a renal artery may be difficult to achieve from within the large diameter/high flow aorta, and may produce harmful intimal injury within the artery. Also, where multiple kidneys must be infused with agent, multiple renal arteries must be cannulated, either sequentially with a single delivery device, or simultaneously with multiple devices. This can become unnecessarily complicated and time consuming and further compound the risk of unwanted injury from the required catheter manipulation. Moreover, multiple dye injections may be required in order to locate the renal ostia for such catheter positioning, increasing the risks associated with contrast agents on kidney function (e.g. RCN)—the very organ system to be protected by the agent delivery system in the first place. Still further, the renal arteries themselves, possibly including their ostia, may have pre-existing conditions that either prevent the ability to provide the required catheter seating, or that increase the risks associated with such mechanical intrusion. For example, the artery wall may be diseased or stenotic, such as due to atherosclerotic plaque, clot, dissection, or other injury or condition. Finally, among other additional considerations, previous disclosures have yet to describe an efficacious and safe system and method for positioning these types of local agent delivery devices at the renal arteries through a common introducer or guide sheath shared with additional medical devices used for upstream interventions, such as angiography or guide catheters. In particular, to do so concurrently with multiple delivery catheters for simultaneous infusion of multiple renal arteries would further require a guide sheath of such significant dimensions that the preferred Seldinger vascular access technique would likely not be available, instead requiring the less desirable “cut-down” technique.
In addition to the various needs for delivering agents into branch arteries described above, much benefit may also be gained from simply enhancing blood perfusion into such branches, such as by increasing the blood pressure at their ostia. In particular, such enhancement would improve a number of medical conditions related to insufficient physiological perfusion into branch vessels, and in particular from an aorta and into its branch vessels such as the renal arteries.
Certain prior disclosures have provided surgical device assemblies and methods intended to enhance blood delivery into branch arteries extending from an aorta. For example, intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABPs) have been disclosed for use in diverting blood flow into certain branch arteries. One such technique involves placing an IABP in the abdominal aorta so that the balloon is situated slightly below (proximal to) the branch arteries. The balloon is selectively inflated and deflated in a counterpulsation mode (by reference to the physiologic pressure cycle) so that increased pressure distal to the balloon directs a greater portion of blood flow into principally the branch arteries in the region of their ostia. However, the flow to lower extremities downstream from such balloon system can be severely occluded during portions of this counterpulsing cycle. Moreover, such previously disclosed systems generally lack the ability to deliver drug or agent to the branch arteries while allowing continuous and substantial downstream perfusion sufficient to prevent unwanted ischemia.
It is further noted that, despite the renal risks described in relation to radiocontrast dye delivery, and in particular RCN, in certain circumstances delivery of such dye or other diagnostic agents is indicated specifically for diagnosing the renal arteries themselves. For example, diagnosis and treatment of renal stenosis, such as due to atherosclerosis or dissection, may require dye injection into a subject renal artery. In such circumstances, enhancing the localization of the dye into the renal arteries may also be desirable. In one regard, without such localization larger volumes of dye may be required, and the dye lost into the downstream aortic flow may still be additive to impacting the kidney(s) as it circulates back there through the system. In another regard, an ability to locally deliver such dye into the renal artery from within the artery itself, such as by seating an angiography catheter there, may also be hindered by the same stenotic condition requiring the dye injection in the first place (as introduced above). Still further, patients may have stent-grafts that may prevent delivery catheter seating.
Notwithstanding the interest and advances toward delivering agents for treatment or diagnosis of organs or tissues, the previously disclosed systems and methods summarized immediately above generally lack the ability to effectively deliver agents from within a main artery and locally into substantially only branch arteries extending therefrom while allowing the passage of substantial blood flow and/or other medical devices through the main artery past the branches. This is in particular the case with previously disclosed renal treatment and diagnostic devices and methods, which do not adequately provide for local delivery of agents into the renal system from a location within the aorta while allowing substantial blood flow continuously downstream past the renal ostia and/or while allowing distal medical device assemblies to be passed retrogradedly across the renal ostia for upstream use. Much benefit would be gained if agents, such as protective or therapeutic drugs or radiopaque contrast dye, could be delivered to one or both of the renal arteries in such a manner.
Several more recently disclosed advances have included local flow assemblies using tubular members of varied diameters that divide flow within an aorta adjacent to renal artery ostia into outer and inner flow paths substantially perfusing the renal artery ostia and downstream circulation, respectively. Such disclosures further include delivering fluid agent primarily into the outer flow path for substantially localized delivery into the renal artery ostia. These disclosed systems and methods represent exciting new developments toward localized diagnosis and treatment of pre-existing conditions associated with branch vessels from main vessels in general, and with respect to renal arteries extending from abdominal aortas in particular.
However, such previously disclosed designs would still benefit from further modifications and improvements in order to: maximize mixing of a fluid agent within the entire circumference of the exterior flow path surrounding the tubular flow divider and perfusing multiple renal artery ostia; use the systems and methods for prophylaxis and protection of the renal system from harm, in particular during upstream interventional procedures; maximize the range of useful sizing for specific devices to accommodate a wide range of anatomic dimensions between patients; and optimize the construction, design, and inter-cooperation between system components for efficient, atraumatic use.
A need still exists for improved devices and methods for delivering agents principally into the renal arteries of a patient from a location within the patient's aorta adjacent the renal artery ostia along the aorta wall while at least a portion of aortic blood flow is allowed to perfuse downstream across the location of the renal artery ostia and into the patient's lower extremities.
A need still exists for improved devices and methods for substantially isolating first and second portions of aortic blood flow at a location within the aorta of a patient adjacent the renal artery ostia along the aorta wall, and directing the first portion into the renal arteries from the location within the aorta while allowing the second portion to flow across the location and downstream of the renal artery ostia into the patient's lower extremities. There is a further benefit and need for providing passive blood flow along the isolated paths and without providing active in-situ mechanical flow support to either or both of the first or second portions of aortic blood flow.
A need still exists for improved devices and methods for locally delivering agents such as radiopaque dye or drugs into a renal artery from a location within the aorta of a patient adjacent the renal artery's ostium along the aorta wall, and without requiring translumenal positioning of an agent delivery device within the renal artery itself or its ostium.
A need still exists for improved devices and methods for bilateral delivery of fluids or agents such as radiopaque dye or drugs simultaneously into multiple renal arteries feeding both kidneys of a patient using a single delivery device and without requiring translumenal positioning of multiple agent delivery devices respectively within the multiple renal arteries themselves.
A need still exists for improved devices and methods for delivery of fluids or agents into the renal arteries of a patient from a location within the patient's aorta adjacent the renal artery ostia along the aorta wall, and while allowing other treatment or diagnostic devices and systems, such as angiographic or guiding catheter devices and related systems, to be delivered across the location.
A need still exists for improved devices and methods for delivering fluids or agents into the renal arteries from a location within the aorta of a patient adjacent to the renal artery ostia along the aorta wall, and other than as a remedial measure to treat pre-existing renal conditions, and in particular for prophylaxis or diagnostic procedures related to the kidneys.
A need still exists for improved devices and methods for delivery of fluids or agents into the renal arteries of a patient in order to treat, protect, or diagnose the renal system adjunctive to performing other contemporaneous medical procedures such as angiograms other translumenal procedures upstream of the renal artery ostia.
A need still exists for improved devices and methods for delivering both an intra aortic drug delivery system and at least one adjunctive distal interventional device, such as an angiographic or guiding catheter, through a common delivery sheath.
A need also still exists for improved devices and methods for delivering both an intra aortic drug delivery system and at least one adjunctive distal interventional device, such as an angiographic or guiding catheter, through a single access site, such as a single femoral arterial puncture.
A need also still exists for improved devices and methods for treating, and in particular preventing, ARF, and in particular relation to RCN or CHF, by locally delivering renal protective or ameliorative drugs into the renal arteries, such as contemporaneous with radiocontrast injections such as during angiography procedures.
A need still exists for improved devices to deliver fluid agents bilaterally to both sides of the renal system from within the aorta system.
A need still exists for improved devices to deliver fluid agents bilaterally to both sides of the renal system without requiring cannulation of the renal arteries themselves.
A need also exists for improved devices to deliver fluid agents bilaterally to both sides of the renal system without substantially occluding, isolating, or diverting blood flow within the abdominal aorta.
In addition to these particular needs for selective fluid delivery into a patient's renal arteries via their ostia along the aorta, other similar needs also exist for fluid delivery into other branch vessels or lumens extending from other main vessels or lumens, respectively, in a patient.
These present embodiments therefore generally relate to intra aortic renal drug delivery systems generally from a position proximal to the renal arteries themselves; however, it is contemplated that these systems and methods may be suitably modified for use in other anatomical regions and for other medical conditions without departing from the broad scope of various of the aspects illustrated by the embodiments. For example, intra aortic fluid delivery according to various of these embodiments benefits from particular dimensions, shapes, and constructions for the subject devices herein described. However, suitable modifications may be made to deliver fluids to other multi-lateral branch structures from main body spaces or lumens, such as for example in other locations within the vasculature (e.g. right and left coronary artery ostia, fallopian tubes stemming from a uterus, or gastrointestinal tract.
One aspect of the invention is a local renal infusion system for treating a renal system in a patient from a location within the abdominal aorta associated with first and second flow paths within an outer region of abdominal aortic blood flow generally along the abdominal aorta wall and into first and second renal arteries, respectively, via their corresponding first and second renal ostia along an abdominal aorta wall in the patient. This system includes a local injection assembly with first and second injection ports. The local injection assembly is adapted to be positioned at the location with the first and second injection ports at first and second respective positions, respectively, corresponding with the first and second flow paths. The local injection assembly is also adapted to be fluidly coupled to a source of fluid agent externally of the patient when the local injection assembly is positioned at the location. Accordingly, the local injection assembly is adapted to inject a volume of fluid agent from the source, through the first and second injection ports at the first and second positions, respectively, and bi-laterally into the first and second renal arteries, also respectively. This assembly is in particular adapted to accomplish such localized bilateral renal delivery via the respective corresponding first and second renal ostia and without substantially altering abdominal aorta flow along the location.
According to certain further modes of this aspect, the local injection assembly is adapted to inject the volume of fluid agent into the first and second flow paths such that the injected volume flows substantially only into the first and second renal arteries without substantially diverting, occluding, or isolating one region of aortic blood flow with respect to the first or second regions of aortic blood flow.
Another further mode also includes a delivery member with a proximal end portion and a distal end portion with a longitudinal axis. The local injection assembly comprises first and second injection members with first and second injection ports, respectively, and is adapted to extend from the distal end portion of the delivery member and is adjustable between a first configuration and a second configuration as follows. The local injection assembly in the first configuration is adapted to be delivered by the delivery member to the location. The local injection assembly at the location is adjustable from the first configuration to the second configuration such that the first and second first injection members are radially extended from the longitudinal axis with the first and second injection ports located at the first and second positions, respectively, at the first and second flow paths.
According to another mode, the local injection assembly includes an elongate body that is adapted to be positioned within the outer region. The first and second injection ports are spaced at different locations around the circumference of the elongate body such that the first and second injection ports are adapted to inject the volume of fluid agent in first and second different respective directions laterally from the elongate body and generally into the first and second flow paths, respectively.
According to one embodiment of this mode, a positioner cooperates with the elongate body and is adapted to position the elongate body within the outer region at the location. In one variation of this embodiment, the positioner is coupled to the elongate body and is adjustable from a first configuration to a second configuration. The positioner in the first configuration is adapted to be delivered to the location with the elongate body. The positioner at the location is adapted to be adjusted from the first configuration to the second configuration that is biased to radially extend from the elongate body relative to the first configuration and against the abdominal aorta wall with sufficient force so as to deflect the orientation of the elongate body into the outer region. Further to this variation the positioner may also beneficially be a partial loop-shaped member that extends with first and second legs from the elongate body. In the first configuration at the location the partial loop-shaped member has a first orientation with respect to the elongate body and is adapted to be delivered to the location. In the second configuration at the location the partial loop-shaped member has a second orientation that is radially extended from the elongate body relative to the first orientation. In still further features according to this variation, the partial loop-shaped member is adjusted to the first configuration when subject to deformation force away from a memory shape, and is self-adjustable from the first configuration to the second configuration by material recovery of the partial loop-shaped member from the first configuration toward the memory shape. The first and second legs may be extendable from the elongate body through first and second extension ports, such that in the first configuration the first and second legs are withdrawn into the elongate body, and in the second configuration the first and second legs are extended from the elongate body through the first and second extension ports, respectively.
In another embodiment, a control member is coupled to the partial loop-shaped member and also to the elongate body, and is adapted to adjust the looped-shape member between the first and second configurations by manipulating the position of the control member.
In still a further embodiment, the positioner comprises a plurality of partial loop-shaped members such as described above.
In another mode of this aspect of the invention, the local injection assembly further includes an elongate body with a longitudinal axis and that is adapted to be positioned at the location. The first and second injection members in the first configuration have first radial positions relative to the longitudinal axis, and in the second configuration have second radial positions. The second radial positions are radially extended from the longitudinal axis relative to the first radial position.
In one embodiment of this mode, the first and second injection members are located on opposite respective sides of the elongate body around a circumference of the elongate body. In one variation of this embodiment, each of the first and second injection members extends between proximal and distal respective locations on each of the opposite respective sides of the elongate body, and in the second configuration the first and second injection members are biased outward from the elongate body between the respective proximal and distal respective locations.
In another embodiment, the local injection assembly is in the form of a generally loop-shaped member, such that the first and second injection members comprise first and second regions along the loop-shaped member, and whereas the first and second injection ports are located on each of the first and second regions. The loop-shaped member in the first configuration has a first diameter between the first and second injection ports such that the loop-shaped member is adapted to be delivered to the location. The loop-shaped member in the second configuration has a second diameter between the first and second injection ports that is greater than the first diameter and is sufficient such that the first and second positions generally correspond with first and second flow paths within the outer region, respectively. According to one variation of this embodiment, the local injection assembly in the second configuration for the loop-shaped member includes a memory shape. The loop-shaped member is adjustable from the second configuration to the first configuration within a radially confining outer delivery sheath. The loop-shaped member is adjustable from the first configuration to the second configuration by removing it from radial confinement outside of the outer delivery sheath.
In another mode, the local injection assembly comprises a plurality of n injection members, wherein n is an integer that is greater than two. Further to this mode, n injection ports are located on the n injection members, respectively. Each of the n injection members is adapted to be positioned at the location such that the n injection ports are located at n unique respective positions within the outer region. The local injection assembly is adapted to be oriented at the location such that n minus two of the plurality of injection members are oriented with the corresponding n minus two injection ports against the abdominal aorta wall, and such that the remaining two injection members of the plurality are oriented such that the two corresponding injection ports are at the first and second positions. Accordingly, the remaining two injection members are the first and second injection members, and the remaining two injection ports on the two remaining injection members are the first and second injection ports.
In one embodiment of this mode, each of the plurality of injection ports at its respectively unique position within the outer region is adapted to be fluidly coupled simultaneously with the source of fluid agent externally of the body. The n minus two injection ports are adapted to be substantially prevented by the abdominal wall from injecting a substantial volume of fluid agent from the source and into the outer region. The remaining two injection ports are adapted to inject a substantial volume of fluid agent from the source and into the first and second renal ostia, respectively, such that local injection of fluid agent from the source is substantially isolated to the two injection ports.
In another embodiment, in the first configuration at the location the n injection members are positioned at n generally unique radially collapsed positions around a circumference having a first diameter around a longitudinal axis of the abdominal aorta at the location. In the second configuration at the location the n injection members are positioned at n generally unique radially expanded positions around a circumference having a second diameter around the longitudinal axis that is greater than the first outer diameter and that is sufficient to position the respective n injection ports at the n respective positions, respectively.
According to another mode, each of the first and second injection members includes an infusion passageway with an array of n injection regions, wherein n is an integer. Each array of n injection regions is adapted to be coupled to the source of fluid agent outside the body. The first and second injection members are adapted to be oriented at the location such that x of the n respective injection regions of each array are positioned within the outer region and in fluid communication with the respective renal ostium, and such that y of the respective injection regions of each array are against the abdominal aorta wall such that they are substantially prevented by the abdominal aorta wall from injecting a volume of fluid agent into the outer region. Accordingly, the first injection port includes at least one of the x injection regions along the first injection member. The second injection port includes at least one of the x injection regions along the second injection member. Further to this description, in general x is a positive number that is not greater than n, and n is equal to x plus y.
In a further mode of the present aspect, first and second markers located along first and second injection members, respectively, at locations generally corresponding with the first and second injection ports. Each of the first and second markers is adapted to indicate to an operator externally of the patient the locations of the first and second injection ports to assist their delivery to the first and second positions, respectively. In particular beneficial embodiments, the first and second markers are radiopaque and provide guidance under fluoroscopy. In a further embodiment, the first and second injection members extend distally from the delivery member from a bifurcation location, and a proximal marker is located at the bifurcation location.
In another mode, a the delivery member is provided that is an introducer sheath with a proximal end portion and a distal end portion that is adapted to be positioned at the location with the proximal end portion of the introducer sheath extending externally from the patient. The delivery member includes a delivery passageway extending between a proximal port assembly along the proximal end portion of the introducer sheath and a distal port assembly along the distal end portion of the introducer sheath. The injection assembly is adapted to be slideably engaged within the introducer sheath, and is adjustable between first and second longitudinal positions. The first and second injection members are located within the delivery passageway in the first longitudinal position and are extended distally through the distal port and from the distal end portion in the second longitudinal position. In a further embodiment of this mode, the distal end portion of the introducer sheath includes a distal tip and a delivery marker at a location corresponding with the distal tip such that the delivery marker is adapted to indicate the relative position of the distal tip within the abdominal aorta at the location. In one further embodiment, the distal port assembly has first and second ports through which the first and second delivery members are extended during adjustment to the second configuration.
In another further embodiment, a catheter body is provided with a proximal end portion and a distal end portion that is adapted to be positioned at the location when the proximal end portion of the catheter body extends externally from the patient. The first and second injection members are coupled to and extend distally from the distal end portion of the catheter body. The proximal port assembly of the introducer sheath comprises a single proximal port, and the first and second injection members and distal end portion of the catheter body are adapted to be inserted into the delivery passageway through the single proximal port.
According to another mode, the system further includes a proximal coupler assembly that is adapted to be fluidly coupled to a source of fluid agent externally of the patient, and also to the first and second injection ports at the first and second positions, respectively.
In one embodiment, the proximal coupler assembly comprises first and second proximal couplers. The first proximal coupler is fluidly coupled to the first injection port, and the second proximal coupler is fluidly coupled to the second injection port. In one variation of this embodiment, a first elongate body extends between the first proximal coupler and the first injection member, and with a first fluid passageway coupled to the first proximal coupler and the first injection port; a second elongate body extends between the second proximal coupler and the second injection member, and with a second fluid passageway coupled to the second coupler and the second injection port. In another variation, the proximal coupler assembly includes a single common coupler that is fluidly coupled to each of the first and second injection ports via a common fluid passageway. According to one feature that may be employed per this variation, an elongate body extends between the single common coupler and the first and second injection members. The elongate body has at least one delivery passageway fluidly coupled to the single common coupler and also to the first and second injection ports.
According to still a further mode of this aspect of the invention, the system further includes a source of fluid agent that is adapted to be coupled to the local injection assembly. The fluid agent may comprises one, or combinations of, the following: saline; a diuretic, such as Furosemide or Thiazide; a vasopressor, such as Dopamine; a vasodilator; another vasoactive agent; Papaverine; a Calcium-channel blocker; Nifedipine; Verapamil; fenoldapam mesylate; a dopamine DA1 agonist; or analogs or derivatives, or combinations or blends, thereof.
Another mode includes a vascular access system with an elongate tubular body with at least one lumen extending between a proximal port assembly and a distal port that is adapted to be positioned within a vessel having translumenal access to the location. The system per this mode also includes a percutaneous translumenal interventional device that is adapted to be delivered to an intervention location across the location while the local injection assembly is at the location. The local injection assembly and percutaneous translumenal interventional device are adapted to be delivered percutaneously to the location and intervention location, respectively, through the vascular access device, and are also adapted to be simultaneously engaged within the vascular access device.
In one embodiment, the percutaneous translumenal interventional device comprises an angiographic catheter. In another, the percutaneous translumenal interventional device is a guiding catheter. In another regard, the interventional device may be between about 4 French and about 8 French.
In another embodiment, the proximal port assembly includes first and second proximal ports. The percutaneous translumenal interventional device is adapted to be inserted into the elongate body through the first proximal port. The first and second ports of the injection assembly are adapted to be inserted into the elongate body through the second proximal port.
According to another mode, the local injection assembly includes a fluid reservoir and the first injection port is fluidly coupled to the fluid reservoir. The fluid reservoir is adjustable between a first condition, a second condition, and a third condition. In the first condition the fluid reservoir is adapted to be delivered to the location with the first injection port at the first position at the location. The fluid reservoir at the location is adapted to be fluidly coupled to a source of fluid agent located externally of the patient. The fluid reservoir at the location is adjustable from the first condition to the second condition such that the first volume from the source is delivered into the fluid reservoir. The local injection assembly at the location is further adjustable from the second condition to the third condition wherein the fluid reservoir discharges the first volume of fluid agent through the injection port at the position. The injected first volume of fluid agent is adapted to flow principally into the first flow path.
Another aspect is a local infusion system for locally delivering a volume of fluid agent from a source located externally of a patient and into a location within a body space of a patient. This system includes a delivery member with a proximal end portion and a distal end portion with a longitudinal axis, and a local injection assembly comprising first and second injection members with first and second injection ports, respectively. The local injection assembly extends from the distal end portion of the delivery member and is adjustable between a first configuration and a second configuration as follows. The local injection assembly in the first configuration is adapted to be delivered by the delivery member to the location. The local injection assembly at the location is adjustable from the first configuration to the second configuration such that the first and second first injection members are radially extended from the longitudinal axis with the first and second injection ports located at first and second relatively unique positions, respectively, at the location. The first and second injection ports at the first and second respective positions are adapted to be fluidly coupled to a source of fluid agent externally of the patient and to inject a volume of fluid agent into the patient at the first and second positions, also respectively, at the location.
Another aspect of the invention is a local infusion system with a local injection assembly comprising an injection member with an injection port and a fluid reservoir fluidly coupled to the injection port. The local injection assembly is adjustable between a first condition, a second condition, and a third condition as follows. In the first condition the local injection assembly is adapted to be delivered to a location within a body space of a patient with the injection port and fluid reservoir at a position within the location. The injection port at the position is adapted to be fluidly coupled to a source of fluid agent located externally of the patient. The local injection assembly at the location is adjustable from the first condition to the second condition such that a volume of fluid agent from the source is delivered via the injection port into the fluid reservoir. The local injection assembly at the location is further adjustable from the second condition to the third condition wherein the fluid reservoir discharges the volume of fluid agent into the location at the position.
Another aspect of the invention is a local infusion system for delivering a volume of fluid agent from a source located externally of a patient and into a portion of an outer region within and generally along a wall of a body space at a location along the body space in the patient. The system includes a local injection assembly with an injection port, and a flow isolation assembly that cooperates with the local injection assembly as follows. The local injection assembly is adapted to be delivered to the location with the injection port at a position within the portion of the outer region. The injection port at the position is adapted to be fluidly coupled to a source of fluid agent located externally of the patient and to inject a volume of fluid agent from the source into the portion of the outer region of the body space. The flow isolation assembly is adjustable between a first condition and a second condition as follows. The flow isolation assembly in the first condition is adapted to be delivered to the location. The flow isolation assembly at the location is adjustable from the first condition to a second condition that is adapted to isolate the injected volume of fluid agent to flow substantially within the portion of the outer region along the location. The portion is located along only a part of the circumference of the outer region that is less than all of the circumference.
Another aspect of the invention is a local renal infusion system for treating a renal system in a patient from a location within the abdominal aorta associated with abdominal aortic blood flow into first and second renal arteries via respective first and second renal ostia having unique relative locations along the abdominal aorta wall. This system includes in one regard a delivery catheter with an elongate body having a proximal end portion, a distal end portion with a distal tip that is adapted to be delivered across the location and to a delivery location that is upstream of the location while the proximal end portion is located externally of the patient, and a delivery lumen extending between a proximal port along the proximal end portion and a distal port along the distal end portion. A local injection assembly is also provided with an injection port. The local injection assembly is adapted to be delivered at least in part by the elongate body to the location such that the injection port is at a position within the location while the distal tip of the delivery catheter is at the delivery position. The injection port at the location is adapted to be fluidly coupled to a source of fluid agent located externally of the patient and to inject a volume of fluid agent from the source into abdominal aorta at the location such that the injected volume flows substantially into the first and second arteries via the first and second renal ostia, respectively.
Another aspect of the invention is a method for treating a renal system in a patient from a location within the abdominal aorta associated with abdominal aortic blood flow into first and second renal arteries via respective first and second renal ostia having unique relative locations along the abdominal aorta wall. This method includes in one regard delivering a delivery catheter with an elongate body having a proximal end portion and a distal end portion with a distal tip across the location and to a delivery location that is upstream of the location while the proximal end portion is located externally of the patient. The method further includes delivering a local injection assembly that includes an injection port at least in part by the elongate body to the location such that the injection port is at a position within the location while the distal tip of the delivery catheter is at the delivery position. The injection port at the location is fluidly coupled to a source of fluid agent located externally of the patient. A volume of fluid agent from the source is injected through the injection port and into abdominal aorta at the location such that the injected volume flows substantially into the first and second arteries via the first and second renal ostia, respectively.
Another aspect of the invention is a method for treating a renal system in a patient from a location within the abdominal aorta associated with abdominal aortic blood flow into first and second renal arteries via their respective first and second renal ostia, respectively, at unique respective locations along the abdominal aorta wall. This method includes: positioning a local injection assembly at the location with first and second injection ports at first and second unique respective positions at the location. Also includes is fluidly coupling the local injection assembly at the location to a source of fluid agent externally of the patient. A further step includes simultaneously injecting a volume of fluid agent from the source through the first and second injection ports at the first and second positions and principally into the first and second renal arteries, respectively.
Another aspect of the invention is a method for treating a renal system in a patient from a location within the abdominal aorta associated with abdominal aortic blood flow into each of first and second renal arteries via first and second renal ostia, respectively, at unique respective locations along the abdominal aorta wall. This method includes positioning a local injection assembly at the location, and fluidly coupling to the local injection assembly at the location to a source of fluid agent externally of the patient. Also included is injecting a volume of fluid agent from the source and into the abdominal aorta at the location in a manner such that the injected fluid flows principally into the first and second renal arteries via the first and second renal ostia, respectively, and without substantially occluding or isolating a substantial portion of an outer region of aortic blood flow along a circumference of the abdominal aorta wall and across the location.
Another aspect of the invention is a method for treating a renal system in a patient from a location within the abdominal aorta associated with abdominal aortic blood flow into each of first and second renal arteries via first and second renal ostia, respectively, at unique respective locations along the abdominal aorta wall. This method aspect includes positioning a delivery member within an abdominal aorta of a patient, and delivering with the delivery member a local injection assembly having first and second injection members with first and second injection ports, respectively, in a first configuration to the location. Also included is adjusting the local injection assembly between the first configuration and a second configuration at the location. Further to this method, in the second configuration the local injection assembly extends from the distal end portion of the delivery member with the first and second first injection members radially extended relative to each other across a portion of the abdominal aorta at the location and with the first and second injection ports located at first and second relatively unique positions, respectively, at the location. A further mode of this aspect is fluidly coupling the first and second injection ports at the first and second respective positions to a source of fluid agent externally of the patient, and injecting a volume of fluid agent into the first and second renal arteries via their respective first and second renal ostia from the first and second positions, respectively.
Another aspect of the invention is a method for treating a renal system in a patient from a location within the abdominal aorta associated with abdominal aortic blood flow into a renal artery via a renal ostium located along the abdominal aorta wall. This method includes delivering a local injection assembly comprising an injection member with a fluid reservoir and an injection port in a first condition to the location with the injection port at a position at the location. Also included is fluidly coupling the fluid reservoir at the location to a source of fluid agent located externally of the patient. Further steps include adjusting the local injection assembly at the location from the first condition to a second condition such that a volume of fluid agent from the source is delivered into the fluid reservoir, and adjusting the local injection assembly at the location from the second condition to a third condition wherein the fluid reservoir discharges the volume of fluid agent through the injection port at the position. Accordingly, the injected volume of fluid agent is adapted to flow principally into the renal artery via the renal ostium.
Another method aspect of the invention is a method for treating a renal system in a patient from a location within the abdominal aorta associated with abdominal aortic blood flow into a renal artery via a renal ostium located along the abdominal aorta wall. This method includes delivering a local injection assembly with an injection port to the location with the injection port at a position within a portion of an outer region of the abdominal aortic blood flow generally along the abdominal aorta wall at the location. Further included is fluidly coupling the injection port at the position to a source of fluid agent located externally of the patient and to inject a volume of fluid agent from the source into the portion of the outer region. Further steps are delivering a flow isolation assembly in a first condition to the location, adjusting the flow isolation assembly at the location from the first condition to a second condition, and isolating the injected volume of fluid agent to flow substantially within the portion of the outer region along the location with the flow isolation assembly in the second condition. According to this method, the portion is located along only a part of the circumference of the outer region that is less than all of the circumference.
Another aspect of the invention is a method for providing local therapy to a renal system in a patient from a location within the abdominal aorta associated with first and second flow paths within an outer region of abdominal aortic blood flow generally along the abdominal aorta wall and into first and second renal arteries, respectively, via their corresponding first and second renal ostia along an abdominal aorta wall in the patient. This method includes positioning a local injection assembly at the location with first and second injection ports at first and second respective positions, respectively, corresponding with the first and second flow paths. Also included is fluidly coupling the local injection assembly to a source of fluid agent externally of the patient when the local injection assembly is positioned at the location, and injecting a volume of fluid agent from the source, through the first and second injection ports at the first and second positions, respectively, and bi-laterally into the first and second renal arteries, also respectively, via the respective corresponding first and second renal ostia without substantially altering abdominal aorta flow along the location.
Further modes of these various method aspects include beneficially enhancing renal function with the injected volume of fluid agent. This may include in particular injecting the volume of fluid agent into the location while performing an interventional procedure at an intervention location within a vasculature of the patient. In one embodiment, this further includes injecting the volume of fluid agent during a period when a volume of radiocontrast dye injection is within the patient's vasculature, and such that the fluid agent is adapted to substantially prevent RCN in response to the radiocontrast dye injection. According to a further beneficial variation, the method includes treating acute renal failure with the injected volume of fluid agent.
Whereas each of these aspects, modes, embodiments, variations, and features is considered independently beneficial and are not to be required in combination with the others, nevertheless the various combinations and sub-combinations thereof as would be apparent to one of ordinary skill are further considered within the intended scope as further independently beneficial aspects of the invention.
Further aspects of the invention will be brought out in the following portions of the specification, wherein the detailed description is for the purpose of fully disclosing preferred embodiments of the invention without placing limitations thereon.
The invention will be more fully understood by reference to the following drawings which are for illustrative purposes only:
Referring more specifically to the drawings, for illustrative purposes the present invention is embodied in the apparatus generally shown in
The description herein provided relates to medical material delivery systems and methods in the context of their relationship in use within a patient's anatomy. Accordingly, for the purpose of providing a clear understanding, the term proximal should be understood to mean locations on a system or device relatively closer to the operator during use, and the term distal should be understood to mean locations relatively further away from the operator during use of a system or device. These present embodiments below therefore generally relate to local renal drug delivery generally from the aorta; however, it is contemplated that these systems and methods may be suitably modified for use in other anatomical regions and for other medical conditions without departing from the broad scope of various of the aspects illustrated by the embodiments.
In general, the disclosed material delivery systems will include a fluid delivery assembly, a proximal coupler assembly and one or more elongated bodies, such as tubes or catheters. These elongated bodies may contain one or more lumens and generally consist of a proximal region, a mid-distal region, and a distal tip region. The distal tip region will typically have means for delivering a material such as a fluid agent. Radiopaque markers or other devices may be coupled to the specific regions of the elongated body to assist introduction and positioning.
The material delivery system is intended to be placed into position by a physician, typically either an interventionalist (cardiologist or radiologist) or an intensivist, a physician who specializes in the treatment of intensive-care patients. The physician will gain access to a femoral artery in the patient's groin, typically using a Seldinger technique of percutaneous vessel access or other conventional method.
For additional understanding, further more detailed examples of other systems and methods for providing local renal drug delivery are variously disclosed in the following published references: WO 00/41612 to Keren et al.; and WO 01/083016 to Keren et al. The disclosures of these references are herein incorporated in their entirety by reference thereto. Moreover, various combinations with, or modifications according to, various aspects of the present embodiments as would be apparent to one of ordinary skill upon review of this disclosure together with these references are also considered within the scope of invention as described by the various independently beneficial embodiments described below.
The invention is also related to subject matter disclosed in other Published International Patent Applications as follows: WO 00/41612 to Libra Medical Systems, published Jul. 20, 2000; and WO 01/83016 to Libra Medical Systems, published Nov. 8, 2001. The disclosures of these Published International Patent Applications are also herein incorporated in their entirety by reference thereto.
Referring initially to
Conversely, the flow stream along an inner wall 34 of the abdominal aorta 10, as indicated by dashed box 36 and dashed box 38, contains a natural laminar flow stream into the branching arteries, e.g., the renal arteries 12, 14, as indicated by arrows 40, 42. In general, the flow stream 32 is of a higher velocity than flow stream 40 along wall 34 of aorta 10. It is to be understood that near the boundaries of dashed box 36,38 with dashed box 30 the flow stream can contain flow streams into the branching arteries 12, 14—as well as down the abdominal aorta 10.
Further, the ostia of renal arteries 12, 14 are positioned to receive substantial blood flow from the blood flow near the posterior wall 34 of aorta 10 as well as the side walls. In other words, blood flow 40 in dashed boxes 36, 38 together is greater than blood flow 32 in dashed box 30 when along the posterior wall of aorta 10 relative to blood flow in the center of aorta 10 as shown in
Accordingly, in order to maximize the flow of a drug solution into the renal arteries using the natural flow patterns shown in
As described in much greater detail below, it is beneficial to infuse a drug solution above the renal arteries 12, 14 at two locations along the wall 34 of the abdominal aorta 10 spaced approximately one-hundred and eighty degrees (180) apart from each other.
Referring now to
It can be appreciated that the bifurcated drug infusion catheter 50 shown in
It can be further appreciated that the infusion of a drug solution from the bifurcated portions 52, 54 of the bifurcated drug infusion catheter 50, when positioned adjacent to the inner wall 34 of the abdominal aorta 10, results in a greater percentage of the drug solution entering the renal arteries 12, 14 than systemic injection. However, “mixing” into the center of the abdominal aorta 10 can still take place, e.g., during the diastolic phase of blood flow through the abdominal aorta 10. Thus, releasing a drug solution from a properly positioned bifurcated drug infusion catheter 50 during the systolic phase, when a more uniform flow pattern is present, can result in a majority of the drug solution flowing into the renal arteries 12, 14. Further, a “passive” infusion assembly, as described below, allows the bifurcated drug infusion catheter 50 to work in a beneficial manner with improved efficiency and reduced complexity. While it is technically feasible to pulse the injection of a drug with an electro mechanical device driven by an ECG signal it is beyond the scope of the desired level of complexity desired.
Referring now to
During diastole, as indicated by arrow 88 in
It can be appreciated that the bifurcated drug infusion catheter 50, shown in
Referring now to
It is to be understood that one or more additional struts or tubes (not shown) may be added to catheter 100 to position or stabilize the infusion tubes 104, 106 near the renal arteries. It is further understood that the additional struts may be made of different materials than the infusion tubes 104, 106.
Still referring to
It can be appreciated that the infusion ring 126 can be made of a material having a radial strength sufficient enough to maintain the infusion ring 126 against the inner wall 34 of the abdominal aorta 10, as shown in
As shown in
One benefit of the infuser ring configuration is it is easy to position, visualize, advance and retract in the aorta. Another benefit is it is low profile. This allows guide catheters and guide wires to pass and reduces thrombus formation due to flow disruption. The low profile low bulk of the infusion ring allows insertion using smaller diameter sheaths. In one beneficial embodiment, the infusion ring is made of a memory shape material such as Nitinol tubing, vertically oriented, and fed through an introducer sheath in a collapsed state to its position near the renal arteries. In another embodiment, the infusion ring is a flexible free form material and a pull wire is extended through the infusion ring to control expansion of the ring and does not require placement by an introducer sheath. This configuration also allows rotational positioning in a contracted state without the risk of vessel trauma. In a further embodiment, additional homodynamic aids (wings, spoilers, flow directors, etc.) can be coupled on the Nitinol loop in areas which cause limited flow disruption (i.e. simply against the aortas' posterior wall).
On the other hand, as shown in
Referring now to
As shown, each collapsible strut 160, 162 includes an infusion port 166. Further, each collapsible strut 160, 162 includes a first marker band 168 above the infusion port 166 and a second marker band 170 below the infusion port 166. Preferably, each marker band is radio-opaque to assist in positioning the drug infusion catheter 150 within the abdominal aorta 10.
Referring briefly to
In the expanded configuration, the infusion ports 216 are positioned immediately adjacent to the renal arteries 12, 14 and can release a drug solution directly into the renal arteries 12, 14. It can be appreciated that the drug infusion catheter 200 can be placed so that the drug solution is infused immediately above the renal arteries 12, 14 along the wall 34 of the abdominal aorta 10. After a specified dwell time within the abdominal aorta 10, the drug infusion catheter 200 can be returned to the collapsed configuration and withdrawn from the abdominal aorta 10.
Referring to
As shown in
It can be appreciated that the stent 256 can form an expandable open-mesh structure that can have an element, or a few elements, that cross the renal ostia without disrupting the blood flow to the renal arteries 12, 14. It is to be understood that the ability to deploy and recapture the stent 256 can be accomplished using a number of methods apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art based on review of this disclosure, e.g., by suitably modifying the methods typically employed for deploying and recapturing temporary vena cava filters or retractable stents.
Referring now to
As shown in
It can be appreciated that the drug infusion catheter 300 shown in
The present embodiment recognizes that experimental observations have shown that a drug solution can flow into the renal arteries 12, 14 naturally, provided the drug infusion is undertaken above the renal arteries 12, 14 and above or closely adjacent to the posterior aspect of the inner wall 34 of the abdominal aorta 10. As shown in
It can be appreciated that the drug infusion catheter 300 can easily allow various guide catheters and guide wires to pass therethrough and that passage can have minimal effect on the tactile feedback or other performance aspects of the adjunctive catheters that are typically used in a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
As shown in
Referring to
Referring now to
As shown in
Referring to
As intended by the present embodiment, the ring 466 maintains the position of the drug infusion catheter 460 against the inner wall 34 of the abdominal aorta 10. Also, the sail 470 is designed to divert blood flow, and thus, the flow of a drug solution trickling from the infusion ports 472, 474, into the renal arteries 12, 14. The preferred position of the drug infusion catheter 460 within the abdominal aorta 10 is such that the infusion ports 472, 474 are closest to the posterior of the abdominal aorta 10.
It is to be understood that it is most advantageous to release the drug solution from the drug infusion guide catheter 500 during systole, as indicated by arrow 504 and arrow 506. As shown in
In this aspect of the present invention, the balloon 524 can be made from silicon, nylon, PEBAX, polyurethane, or any other similar compliant or semi-compliant material well known in the art. Moreover, the balloon 524 can be inflated such that it engages the inner wall 34 of the abdominal aorta 10 or it can be inflated such that it is smaller than the diameter of the inner wall 34 of the abdominal aorta 10 so that it will not entirely block the flow of blood through the abdominal aorta 10. Basically, the size of the balloon 524 can be easily varied by varying the inflation pressure of the balloon 524 thereby affecting the blood flow past renal arteries 12, 14.
It is to be understood that the drug infusion guide catheter 520 shown in
As previously stated above, it is beneficial to release a drug solution in the abdominal aorta 10, e.g., from the drug infusion guide catheter 520, during systole, as indicated by arrow 526 and arrow 528. During systole, the drug solution can flow in a generally downward direction from the infusion port 522, as indicated by arrow 530 and arrow 532, and into the right renal artery 12 and the left renal artery 14, as indicated by arrow 534 and arrow 536. It can be appreciated that the balloon 524 maximizes the flow of the drug solution into the renal arteries 12, 14. Per this embodiment, a counter pulsation of the balloon relative to the systolic/diastolic cycle may be used to enhance performance.
Referring now to
Referring briefly to
It is to be understood that the drug infusion guide catheter 550 shown in
As previously stated above, it is most beneficial to release a drug solution in the abdominal aorta 10, e.g., from the drug infusion guide catheter 550, during systole, as indicated by arrow 564 and arrow 566 shown in
Referring to
Referring now to
Further, as shown in
In a beneficial embodiment, a standard catheter introducer sheath, usually 8-23 cm in length (not shown), is replaced with a longer catheter introducer sheath 644 that can reach the renal arteries. A longer sheath, 40-60 cm in length, depending on patient height and vascular tortuousity, is used in lieu of the standard catheter introducer sheath, and its distal tip is placed at a level slightly above the renals, preferably at or below the level of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). The drug desired to be infused selectively into the renal arteries is infused through the catheter introducer sheath while the coronary procedure is performed. This is a marked improvement over systemic infusion of a drug solution since the flow to the renal arteries 12, 14 is about 30 percent of total aortic blood flow.
Referring to
In a beneficial embodiment, the central catheter tube 702 is advanced into the abdominal aorta 10 until the drug infusion balloon 704 is in the peri-renal aorta. The drug infusion balloon 704 is then inflated such that the drug infusion balloon 704 partially covers the renal arteries 12, 14. Some of the infusion ports 708 formed in the drug infusion balloon 704 can be pressed against the inner wall 34 of the abdominal aorta 10 and accordingly, be blocked thereby. Other infusion ports 706 in proximity to the renal arteries 12, 14 can be unblocked. A drug solution can be supplied to the drug infusion balloon 704 via the central catheter tube 702. A drug infusion tube 710 is connected to the catheter introducer hub 706 and supplies the drug solution to the central catheter tube 702. Since the drug solution can flow through the unblocked infusion ports 708, as indicated by arrow 712 and arrow 714, the delivery of the drug solution to the renal arteries 12, 14 is maximized.
It is to be understood that the catheter system 700 described in detail above can further include an intake (not shown) above the drug infusion balloon 704. Thus, blood can flow into the drug infusion balloon 704 and pre-mix with the drug solution within the drug infusion balloon 704 prior to delivery to the renal arteries. Additionally, it can be appreciated that the catheter system 700 described above can be an individual system or it can be incorporated with another interventional device, i.e., mounted on a guiding catheter.
Referring now to
Accordingly, as intended by the present embodiment, the self-shaping drug infusion catheter 720 can remain straight and highly flexible with the guide wire 724 installed therein. However, when the guide wire 724 is withdrawn, or otherwise retracted, from within the self-shaping drug infusion catheter 720, the self-shaping drug infusion catheter 720 returns to its free state shape. It can be appreciated that the self-shaping drug infusion catheter 720 can also return to its free state shape via a thermal response—if necessary.
In a beneficial embodiment, shown in
In the juxta-renal position, shown in
In
In
In
Vessel dilator 954, with distal end 980 and proximal end 982 is a polymer, (e.g. extrusion) tubing with a center lumen for a guide wire (not shown). Distal end 980 is adapted with a taper cone shape. Proximal end 982 is coupled to a Luer fitting 984.
Fluid delivery system 956 has stiff tube 986, torque handle 988, and proximal hub 990 as previously described in
A single lumen, tear-away delivery sheath 1004 has a distal end 1006, a proximal end 1008, and slidingly encases stiff tube 986. Delivery sheath 1004 is positioned between the torque handle 988 and the bifurcated catheter 956. The distal end 1006 has a shape and outer diameter adapted to mate with the channel restriction in the distal end of the main channel of the Y hub body as shown previously in
Dilator 954 is inserted through Touhy Borst valve 968 on secondary port 970 until distal end 980 protrudes from distal tip 978 of introducer sheath 976 to form a smooth outer conical shape. Distal tip 978 of introducer sheath 976 is positioned in the aorta system near the renal arteries (not shown). Dilator 954 is removed and fluid delivery device 956 is prepared by sliding delivery sheath 1004 distally until aortic infusion assembly 958 is enclosed in delivery sheath 1004. Distal end 1006 of delivery sheath 1004 is inserted in Touhy Borst valve 968 and advanced to the restriction in the main channel of the Y hub body shown in
It is to be understood that each of the embodiments described in detail above provide a device that can be used for selective therapeutic drug infusion as sites remote to a primary treatment site. These devices can be applicable to interventional radiology procedures, including interventional diagnostic and therapeutic procedures involving the coronary arteries. Further, each of the devices described above, can be beneficial for delivering certain drugs, e.g., papaverine; Nifedipine; Verapamil; fenoldopam mesylate; Furosamide; Thiazide; and Dopamine; or analogs, derivatives, combinations, or blends thereof, to the renal arteries of a patient who is simultaneously undergoing a coronary intervention with the intent of increasing the kidney's ability to process of organically-bound iodine, i.e., radiographic contrast, as measured by serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR).
The various embodiments herein described for the present invention can be useful in treatments and therapies directed at the kidneys such as the prevention of radiocontrast nephropathy (RCN) from diagnostic treatments using iodinated contrast materials. As a prophylactic treatment method for patients undergoing interventional procedures that have been identified as being at elevated risk for developing RCN, a series of treatment schemes have been developed based upon local therapeutic agent delivery to the kidneys. Among the agents identified for such treatment are normal saline (NS) and the vasodilators papaverine (PAP) and fenoldopam mesylate (FM).
The approved use for fenoldopam is for the in-hospital intravenous treatment of hypertension when rapid, but quickly reversible, blood pressure lowering is needed. Fenoldopam causes dose-dependent renal vasodilation at systemic doses as low as approximately 0.01 mcg/kg/min through approximately 0.5 mcg/kg/min IV and it increases blood flow both to the renal cortex and to the renal medulla. Due to this physiology, fenoldopam may be utilized for protection of the kidneys from ischemic insults such as high-risk surgical procedures and contrast nephropathy. Dosing from approximately 0.01 to approximately 3.2 mcg/kg/min is considered suitable for most applications of the present embodiments, or about 0.005 to about 1.6 mcg/kg/min per renal artery (or per kidney). As before, it is likely beneficial in many instances to pick a starting dose and titrate up or down as required to determine a patient's maximum tolerated systemic dose. Recent data, however, suggest that about 0.2 mcg/kg/min of fenoldopam has greater efficacy than about 0.1 mcg/kg/min in preventing contrast nephropathy and this dose is preferred.
The dose level of normal saline delivered bilaterally to the renal arteries may be set empirically, or beneficially customized such that it is determined by titration. The catheter or infusion pump design may provide practical limitations to the amount of fluid that can be delivered; however, it would be desired to give as much as possible, and is contemplated that levels up to about 2 liters per hour (about 25 cc/kg/hr in an average about 180 lb patient) or about one liter or 12.5 cc/kg per hour per kidney may be beneficial.
Local dosing of papaverine of up to about 4 mg/min through the bilateral catheter, or up to about 2 mg/min has been demonstrated safety in animal studies, and local renal doses to the catheter of about 2 mg/min and about 3 mg/min have been shown to increase renal blood flow rates in human subjects, or about 1 mg/min to about 1.5 mg/min per artery or kidney. It is thus believed that local bilateral renal delivery of papaverine will help to reduce the risk of RCN in patients with pre-existing risk factors such as high baseline serum creatinine, diabetes mellitus, or other demonstration of compromised kidney function.
It is also contemplated according to further embodiments that a very low, systemic dose of papaverine may be given, either alone or in conjunction with other medical management such as for example saline loading, prior to the anticipated contrast insult. Such a dose may be on the order for example of between about 3 to about 14 mg/hr (based on bolus indications of approximately 10-40 mg about every 3 hours—papaverine is not generally dosed by weight). In an alternative embodiment, a dosing of 2-3 mg/min or 120-180 mg/hr. Again, in the context of local bilateral delivery, these are considered halved regarding the dose rates for each artery itself.
Notwithstanding the particular benefit of this dosing range for each of the aforementioned compounds, it is also believed that higher doses delivered locally would be safe. Titration is a further mechanism believed to provide the ability to test for tolerance to higher doses. In addition, it is contemplated that the described therapeutic doses can be delivered alone or in conjunction with systemic treatments such as intraveneous saline.
From the foregoing discussion, it will be appreciated that the various embodiments described herein generally provide for infusion of renal protective drugs into each of two renal arteries perfusing both kidneys in a patient. The devices and methods of these embodiments are useful in prophylaxis or treatment of kidney malfunction or conditions, such as for example ARF. Various drugs may be delivered via the systems and methods described, including for example: vasodilators; vasopressors; diuretics; Calcium-channel blockers; or dopamine DA1 agonists; or combinations or blends thereof. Further, more specific, examples of drugs that are contemplated in the overall systems and methods described include but are not limited to: Papaverine; Nifedipine; Verapamil; Fenoldapam; Furosamide; Thiazide; and Dopamine; or analogs, derivatives, combinations, or blends thereof.
It is to be understood that the invention can be practiced in other embodiments that may be highly beneficial and provide certain advantages. For example radiopaque markers are shown and described above for use with fluoroscopy to manipulate and position the introducer sheath and the intra aortic catheters. The required fluoroscopy equipment and auxiliary equipment devices are typically located in a specialized location limiting the in vivo use of the invention to that location. Other modalities for positioning intra aortic catheters are highly beneficial to overcome limitations of fluoroscopy. For example, non fluoroscopy guided technology is highly beneficial for use in operating rooms, intensive care units, and emergency rooms, where fluoroscopy may not be readily available or its use may cause undue radiation exposure to users and others due to a lack of specific radiation safeguards normally present in angiography suites and the like. The use of non-fluoroscopy positioning allows intra aortic catheter systems and methods to be used to treat other diseases such as ATN and CHF in clinical settings outside of the angiography suite or catheter lab.
In one embodiment, the intra aortic catheter is modified to incorporate marker bands with metals that are visible with ultrasound technology. The ultrasonic sensors are placed outside the body surface to obtain a view. In one variation, a portable, noninvasive ultrasound instrument is placed on the surface of the body and moved around to locate the device and location of both renal ostia. This technology is used to view the aorta, both renal ostia and the intra aortic catheter.
In another beneficial embodiment, ultrasound sensors are placed on the introducer sheath and the intra aortic catheter itself, specifically the tip of the aortic catheter or at a proximal section of the catheter. The intra aorta catheter with the ultrasonic sensors implemented allows the physician to move the sensors up and down the aorta to locate both renal ostia.
A further embodiment incorporates Doppler ultrasonography with the intra aortic catheters. Doppler ultrasonography detects the direction, velocity, and turbulence of blood flow. Since the renal arteries are isolated along the aorta, the resulting velocity and turbulence is used to locate both renal ostia. A further advantage of Doppler ultrasonography is it is non invasive and uses no x rays.
A still further embodiment incorporates optical technology with the intra aorta catheter. An optical sensor is placed at the tip of the introducer sheath. The introducer sheath's optical sensor allows visualization of the area around the tip of the introducer sheath to locate the renal ostia. In a further mode of this embodiment, a transparent balloon is positioned around the distal tip of the introducer sheath. The balloon is inflated to allow optical visual confirmation of renal ostium. The balloon allows for distance between the tip of the introducer sheath and optic sensor while separating aorta blood flow. That distance enhances the ability to visualize the image within the aorta. In a further mode, the balloon is adapted to allow profusion through the balloon wall while maintaining contact with the aorta wall. An advantage of allowing wall contact is the balloon can be inflated near the renal ostium to be visually seen with the optic sensor. In another mode, the optic sensor is placed at the distal tips of the intra aortic catheter. Once the intra aortic catheter is deployed within the aorta, the optic sensor allows visual confirmation of the walls of the aorta. The intra aortic catheter is tracked up and down the aorta until visual confirmation of the renal ostia is found. With the optic image provided by this mode, the physician can then track the positioning of the intra aortic catheter to the renal arteries.
Another embodiment uses sensors that measure pressure, velocity, and/or flow rate to locate renal ostia without the requirement of fluoroscopy equipment. The sensors are positioned at the distal end of the intra aortic catheter. The sensors display real time data about the pressure, velocity, and/or flow rate. With the real-time data provided, the physician locates both renal ostia by observing the sensor data when the intra aortic catheter is around the approximate location of the renal ostia. In a further mode of this embodiment, the intra aortic catheter has multiple sensors positioned at a mid distal and a mid proximal position on the catheter to obtain mid proximal and mid distal sensor data. From this real time data, the physician can observe a significant flow rate differential above and below the renal arteries and locate the approximate location. With the renal arteries being the only significant sized vessels within the region, the sensors would detect significant changes in any of the sensor parameters.
In a still further embodiment, chemical sensors are positioned on the intra aortic catheter to detect any change in blood chemistry that indicates to the physician the location of the renal ostia. Chemical sensors are positioned at multiple locations on the intra aortic catheter to detect chemical change from one sensor location to another.
Although the description above contains many details, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention but as merely providing illustrations of some of the presently preferred embodiments of this invention. Therefore, it will be appreciated that the scope of the present invention fully encompasses other embodiments which may become obvious to those skilled in the art, and that the scope of the present invention is accordingly to be limited by nothing other than the appended claims, in which reference to an element in the singular is not intended to mean “one and only one” unless explicitly so stated, but rather “one or more.” All structural, chemical, and functional equivalents to the elements of the above-described preferred embodiment that are known to those of ordinary skill in the art are expressly incorporated herein by reference and are intended to be encompassed by the present claims. Moreover, it is not necessary for a device or method to address each and every problem sought to be solved by the present invention, for it to be encompassed by the present claims. Furthermore, no element, component, or method step in the present disclosure is intended to be dedicated to the public regardless of whether the element, component, or method step is explicitly recited in the claims. No claim element herein is to be construed under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for.”
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/084,434 filed on Mar. 18, 2005, which is a continuation of PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US03/29995, filed Sep. 22, 2003, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. Nos. 60/412,343, filed on Sep. 20, 2002; 60/412,476, filed on Sep. 20, 2002; 60/479,329, filed on Jun. 17, 2003; and 60/502,389, filed on Sep. 13, 2003. The full disclosure of each of the foregoing applications is hereby incorporated by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1696018 | Schellberg | Dec 1928 | A |
| 2499045 | Walker et al. | Feb 1950 | A |
| 3144868 | Jascalevich | Aug 1964 | A |
| 3455298 | Anstadt | Jul 1969 | A |
| 3516408 | Montanti | Jun 1970 | A |
| 3667069 | Blackshear et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
| 3730186 | Edmunds, Jr. et al. | May 1973 | A |
| 3791374 | Guarino | Feb 1974 | A |
| 3841331 | Wilder et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
| 3995623 | Blake et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4248224 | Jones | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4309994 | Grunwald | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4345602 | Yoshimura et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4407271 | Schiff | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4423725 | Baran et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4459977 | Pizon et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4490374 | Bandurco et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4493697 | Krause et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4536893 | Parravicini | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4546759 | Solar | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4554284 | Stringer et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4636195 | Wolinsky | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4685446 | Choy | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4689041 | Corday et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4705502 | Patel | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4705507 | Boyles | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4712551 | Rayhanabad | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4714460 | Calderon | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4723939 | Anaise | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4753221 | Kensey et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4781716 | Richelsoph | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4817586 | Wampler | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4834707 | Evans | May 1989 | A |
| 4840172 | Augustine et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4846831 | Skillin | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4861330 | Voss | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4863461 | Jarvik | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4888011 | Kung et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4902272 | Milder et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4902291 | Kolff | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4906229 | Wampler | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4909252 | Goldberger | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4911163 | Fina | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4919647 | Nash | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4925377 | Inacio et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4925443 | Heilman et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4927407 | Dorman | May 1990 | A |
| 4927412 | Menasche | May 1990 | A |
| 4938766 | Jarvik | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4950226 | Barron | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4957477 | Lundback | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4964864 | Summers et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4976691 | Sahota | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4976692 | Atad | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4990139 | Jang | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4995864 | Bartholomew et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5002531 | Bonzel | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5002532 | Gaiser et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5034001 | Garrison et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5044369 | Sahota | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5053023 | Martin | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5059178 | Ya | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5067960 | Grandjean | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5069662 | Bodden | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5069680 | Grandjean | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5073094 | Dorman et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5087244 | Wolinsky | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5089019 | Grandjean | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5098370 | Rahat et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5098442 | Grandjean | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5112301 | Fenton, Jr. et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5112349 | Summers et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5119804 | Anstadt | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5129883 | Black | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5131905 | Grooters | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5135474 | Swan et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5158540 | Wijay et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5160323 | Andrew | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5163910 | Schwartz et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5167628 | Boyles | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5180364 | Ginsburg | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5205810 | Guiraudon et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5217985 | Reitz et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5226888 | Arney | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5256141 | Gencheff et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5257974 | Cox | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5282784 | Willard | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5290227 | Pasque | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5292309 | Van Tassel et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5308319 | Ide et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5308320 | Safar et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5312343 | Krog et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5320604 | Walker et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5326374 | Ilbawi et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5328470 | Nabel et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5328471 | Slepian | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5332403 | Kolff | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5345927 | Bonutti | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5358519 | Grandjean | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5364337 | Guiraudon et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5370617 | Sahota | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5383840 | Heilman et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5383854 | Safar et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5397307 | Goodin | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5411479 | Bodden | May 1995 | A |
| 5415637 | Khosravi | May 1995 | A |
| 5419777 | Hofling | May 1995 | A |
| 5421826 | Crocker et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5429584 | Chiu | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5453084 | Moses | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5458575 | Wang et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5464449 | Ryan et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5476453 | Mehta | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5478331 | Helflin et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5484385 | Rishton | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5505701 | Anaya Fernandez de Lomana | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5509428 | Dunlop | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5536250 | Klein et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5558617 | Heilman et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5569296 | Marin et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5599306 | Klein et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5609574 | Kaplan et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5609628 | Keranen | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5613948 | Avellanet | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5613949 | Miraki | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5613980 | Chauhan | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5617878 | Taheri | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5643171 | Bradshaw et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5643215 | Fuhrman et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5669924 | Shaknovich | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5702343 | Alferness | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5713853 | Clark et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5713860 | Kaplan et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5720735 | Dorros | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5755779 | Horiguchi | May 1998 | A |
| 5762599 | Sohn | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5766151 | Valley et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5776190 | Jarvik | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5797876 | Spears et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5807311 | Palestrant | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5807895 | Stratton et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5817046 | Glickman | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5902229 | Tsitllik et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5902336 | Mishkin | May 1999 | A |
| 5913852 | Magram | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5928132 | Leschinsky | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5935924 | Bunting et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5947977 | Slepian et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5968013 | Smith et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5971910 | Tsitlik et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5984955 | Wisselink | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6001079 | Pourchez | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6013054 | Jiun Yan | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6039721 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6044845 | Lewis | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6068629 | Haissaguerre et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6077256 | Mann | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6086527 | Talpade | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6086557 | Morejohn et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6096073 | Webster et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6117117 | Mauch | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6117156 | Richter et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6129705 | Grantz | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6139517 | Macoviak et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6142973 | Carleton et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6143002 | Vietmeier | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6156016 | Maginot | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6165120 | Scheich, Jr. et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6183492 | Hart et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6186146 | Glickman | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6190349 | Ash et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6210318 | Lederman | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6210380 | Mauch | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6251133 | Richter et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6261273 | Ruiz | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6261316 | Shaolian et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6287277 | Yan | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6287608 | Levin et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6325826 | Vardi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6387037 | Boiling et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6390969 | Boiling et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6468241 | Gelfand et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6475208 | Mauch | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6482211 | Choi | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6494861 | Tsukernik | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6494875 | Mauch | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6508787 | Erbel et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6514226 | Levin et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6533747 | Polschegg et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6537247 | Shannon | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6537495 | Cambron et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6540779 | Richter et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6554819 | Reich | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6592567 | Levin et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6595959 | Statienko et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6669718 | Besselink | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6699231 | Sterman et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6699232 | Hart et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6699272 | Slepian et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6733474 | Kusleika | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6749598 | Keren et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6749628 | Callol et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6780174 | Mauch | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6884258 | Vardi et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6887258 | Denison et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6911039 | Shiu et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6945992 | Goodson et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6994700 | Elkins et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7063679 | Maguire et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7104981 | Elkins et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7122019 | Kesten et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7241273 | Maguire et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7329236 | Kesten et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7335192 | Keren et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7381204 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7470252 | Mickley et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7585836 | Goodson et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 20010029349 | Leschinsky | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010031907 | Downey et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20020022857 | Goldsteen et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020090388 | Humes et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020091349 | Reich | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020091355 | Hayden | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020161393 | Demond et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165574 | Ressemann et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020169413 | Keren et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030023200 | Barbuit et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030050600 | Ressemann et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030069468 | Bolling et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030083617 | Germain et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030100919 | Hopkins et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030144636 | Liu | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030144686 | Martinez et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030153898 | Schon et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030171770 | Kusleika et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030181856 | Goldman | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030220664 | Petrick et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040002730 | Denison et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044302 | Bernard et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040059276 | Maguire et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040059277 | Maguire et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040064089 | Kesten et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040064091 | Keren et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040097900 | Keren et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111148 | Goodson | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117003 | Ouriel et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167415 | Gelfand et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167463 | Zawacki et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040254236 | Dong et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050027305 | Shiu et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050197624 | Goodson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050245882 | Elkins et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050245892 | Elkins et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050267010 | Goodson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060030814 | Valencia et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060036218 | Goodson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060047266 | Elkins et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060069323 | Elkins et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060079836 | Holman et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060079859 | Elkins et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149350 | Patel et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060259066 | Euteneuer | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070053904 | Kirst et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 4324637 | Jul 1993 | DE |
| 654283 | Nov 1994 | EP |
| 884064 | May 1998 | EP |
| 2239675 | Jul 1994 | GB |
| WO 9402197 | Feb 1994 | WO |
| WO 9711737 | Apr 1997 | WO |
| WO 9803213 | Jan 1998 | WO |
| WO 9817347 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| WO 9852639 | Nov 1998 | WO |
| WO 9933407 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| WO 9922784 | May 1999 | WO |
| WO 9951286 | Oct 1999 | WO |
| WO 0041612 | Jan 2000 | WO |
| WO 0007657 | Feb 2000 | WO |
| WO 0051675 | Sep 2000 | WO |
| WO 0137882 | May 2001 | WO |
| WO 0141861 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO 0183016 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO 0197687 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 0197717 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 0197878 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 0197879 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 2004026370 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004032791 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005002660 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005014100 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| “Chronic Renal Insufficiency,” downloaded from internet website http://www.nutropin.com/patient/5—1—renal—insifficiency.jsp, retrieved on Nov. 13, 2006. |
| “Diabetes Mellitus,” University of Maryland Medical Center webpage, retrieved from http://www.umm.edu/altmed/ConsConditions/DiabetesMellituscc.html on Nov. 13, 2006. |
| Agostoni et al. Sustained Benefit from Ultrafiltration in Moderate Congestive heart failure Cardiology 2001:96 183-189. |
| Akaba, N. et al.; “A Cylinder-Shaped Balloon Catheter for the Management of Dissecting Aneurysms in Acute Stage,” Herz, vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 390-393, Dec. 1992. Abstract Only. |
| Aspelin, et al., “Nephrotoxic Effects in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Angiography,” N Engl J Med, Feb. 2003, vol. 348, No. 6, pp. 491-499. |
| Bakris, et al., Renal Hemodynamics in Radiocontrast Medium-Induced Renal Dysfunction etc. Kidney Internation, vol. 56 pp. 206-210 (1999). |
| Beregi, et al., “Doppler Flow Wire Evaluation of Renal Blood Flow Reserve in Hyertenstive Patient With Normal Renal Arteries,” Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 23, pp. 340-346 (2000). |
| Bergey, E.A. et al.; “Transhepatic Insertion of Vascular Dialysis Catheters in Children: A Safe, Life-Prolonging Prolonging Procedure,” Pediatr. Radiol., vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 42-50, Jan. 1999. Abstract Only. |
| Bischoff, W. et al.; “Modified in Suty Perfusion of the Kidney Using Balloon Catheters,” vol. 94, No. 30, pp. 1695-1697, Oct. 21, 1976. Abstract Only. |
| Briguori et al., “Contrast Agent-Associated Nephrotoxicity,” Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 45;6(2003): 493-503. |
| Canaud, B. et al.; “Temporary Vascular Access for Extracorporeal Renal Replacement Therapies in Acute Renal Failure Patients,” Kidney Int. Suppl., vol. 66, pp. S142-S150, May 1998. Abstract Only. |
| Chatterjee, “Refractory heart failure-drugs and devices”, European Heart Journal, 2001, 22:2227-2230. |
| Chu, et al. “Fenoldopam in the Prevention of Contrast Media-Induced Acute Renal Failure,” The Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 35:1278-1282 (2001). |
| Cohn, Jay N.; “The Management of Chronic Heart Failure,” The New England Journal of Medicine, pp. 490-498. Aug. 15, 1996. |
| Darves, “ASHP: Perioperative Fenoldopam Improves Renal Function During Major Surgery,” Retrieved from the Internet [Online]: www.pslgroup.com/dg/225C72.htm, Dec. 19, 2002. |
| Del Greco, The Kidney in Congestive Heart Failure, Modern Concepts of Cardiovascular, Sep. 1975, vol. 44, No. 9, pp. 47-52. |
| D'Elia, et al., Nephrotoxicity from Angiographic Contrast Material, “A prospective Study,” Am J Med, May 1982, vol. 72, pp. 719-725. |
| Diaz-Sandoval, et al., “Acetylcysteine to Prevent Angiography-Related Renal Tissue Injury,” The American Journal of Cardiology, Feb. 1, 2002: vol. 89, pp. 356-358. |
| Drescher, et al., Prevention of Contrast Medium-Induced Renal Vasospasm by Phosphodiesterase Inhibition, Ivest Radiol 1998; 33:858-862. |
| Eisenberg, et al., Renal Failure After Major Angiography Can be Avoided with Hydration, AJR, May 1981; 136:859-861. |
| Eisenberg, et al., Renal Failure After Major Angiography, Am J Med, Jan. 1980, vol. 68, pp. 43-46. |
| Eisenberger, F. et al.; “Transfemoral Cannulation of the Renal Vessels. Diagnostic and Therapeutic use in Urology,” Urologe [A], vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 1-5, Jan. 1977. Abstract Only. |
| Elkayam, et al., Renal Hemodynaic Effects of Vasodilation with Nifedipine and Hydralazine in Patients With Heart Failure, JACC Dec. 1984; vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 1261-1267. |
| Elkayam, et al., Renal Vasodilatory Effect of Endothelial Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Congestive Heart Failure, J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:176-182. |
| Encarta dictionary, “Prevent,” downloaded from website http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/features/dictionary/DictionaryResults.aspx?refid=1861737040, 2007, 1 page, retrieved Apr. 18, 2007. |
| Farncombe, “Dyspnea: assessment and treatment,” Support Care Cancer, 1997, 5, 94-99. |
| Freeman, et al., “Nephopathy Requiring Dialysis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and the Critical role of an Adjusted Contrast Dose,” Am J Cardiol, vol. 90, (Nov. 15, 2002) pp. 1068-1073. |
| Garwood, Susan et al.; “Renal Preservation Strategies for High Risk Patients,”University of Chico School Medicine, Cover Page, Table of Contents Page, pp. 1-19, 1998. |
| Geisburg et al., “Addressing the Challenges of Cardiorenal Syndrome,” Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 2006, 73, 485-491. |
| Gerlach, et al., “Contrast Medium-Induced Nephrotoxicity: Pathophysiology and Prevention,” Pharmacotherapy, 2000, 20(5):540-548. |
| Gianello et al., Clinical Transplantation, 1995, 9, 481-489. |
| Greco, B.A. et al.; “Atherosclerotic Ischemic Renal Disease,” Am. J. Kidney Dis., vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 167-187, Feb. 1997. Abstractly Only. |
| Gruberg, et al. The prognostic implications of further renal deterioration within 48 h of interventional etc. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000, 20(5):540-548. |
| Halpenny et al. The effects of fendolopam on renal blood flow and tubular function during aortic cross-clamping in anaesthetized dogs, EUR J Anaestestheisol, Aug. 2000: 17(8); 491-8 Abstract. |
| Heyman, et al., Pathophysiology of Radiocontract Nephropathy, A Role for Medullary Hypoxia, Invest Radiol, 1999; 34:685-691. |
| Hobbs, et al., “An Update on Nesiritide for Treatment of Decompensated Heart Failure,” Exp. Opin. Invest. Drugs, 2001, 10(5):935-942. |
| Houghton, et al., “Basal and Reserve Renal Artery Blood Flow: Effect of Endothelium-Dependent and Independent Vasoactive Agonists and Radiographic Contrast Medium in Two Patients”, J invas Cardiol 2000,12: 211-215. |
| Hunter et al., “Preventing Contrast-Induced Nephropathy with Fenoldopam,” Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2001. 4:1:53-56. |
| Iannone, L.D. et al.; “Effect of Primary Balloon Expandable Renal Artery Stents o Long-Term Patency, Renal Function, and Blood Pressure in Hypertensive and Renal Insufficient Patients with Renal Artery Stenosis,” Cathet. Cardiovasc. Dign., vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 243-250, Mar. 1996. Abstract Only. |
| Jacobs, M.J. et al.; “Reduced Renal Failure Following Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair by Selective Prefusion,” Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 201-205, Aug. 1998. Abstract Only. |
| Katsumata T. et al. “Newly-Developed Catheter for Cardio-Renal Assist During Intraaortic Balloon Counterpulsation,” Kyobu Geka, vol. 46, No. 9, pp. 767-770, Aug. 1993. Abstract Only. |
| Kay, et al., Acetylcysteine for Prevention of Acute Deterioration of Renal Function Following Elective Coronary Angiography and Intervention, JAMA, vol. 289 No. 5, (Feb. 5, 2003). |
| Kehrer et al.; “Construction and Experimental Application of a Catheter for Selective Arterial Kidney Perfusion in Situ,” Urological Research, vol. 13, pp. 85-89, 1985. |
| Kim, et al., Fluriscopic Landmarks for Optimal Visualization of the Proximal Renal Arteries, JVIR, 10:37-39 (1999). |
| Kini et al. A protocol for Prevention of Radiographic contrast Nepropathy etc. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 2002, 55:169-173. |
| Kini et al. Managing the High-Risk Patient: Experience with Fenoldopam etc. Rev. Cardiovas Med 2001:2(suppl 1) S19-S25. |
| Kobayashi, A. et al.; “Experimental Study on the Usefulness of the Autoperfusion Balloon Catheter in Maintaining the Blood Supply to the Distal Organs,” Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi, vol. 52, No. 5, pp. 682-684, May 25, 1992. Abstract Only. |
| Kou-Gi Shyu et al., “Acetylcysteine Protects Against Acute Renal Damage in Patients with Abnormal Renal Function Undergoing a Coronary Procedure,” The Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2002; 40:8. |
| Lass, et al., Cardiocascular and Renal Hemodynamic Effects of Intravenous Infusions of the Selective DA1Agonist ec., Circulation 1988; 78:1310-1315. |
| Levin, Howard, R. et al.; “Reversal of Chronic Ventricular Dilation in Patients with End-Stage Cardiomyopathy by Prolonged Mechanical Unloading,” vol. 91, No. 11, pp. 2727-2748, Jun. 1, 1995. |
| Linden, R.J. et al.; “The Nature of the Atrial Receptors Responsible for a Reflex Decrease in Activity in Renal Nerves of the Dog,” The Physiological Society, pp. 31-40, 1980. |
| Madyoon et al., “Clinical Experience with the Use of Fenoldopam for Prevention of Radiocontrast Hephropathy etc,” Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2001, 2(suppl 1 ); S26-S30. |
| Madyoon et al., “Use of Fenoldopam to Prevent Radiocontrast Nephropathy etc. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 2001”, 53:341-345. |
| Madyoon, Hooman et al., Fenoldopam for prevention of contrast-induced renal dysfunction in a high risk angiography population: A historically-controlled case series:, Circulation, vol. 104, No. Suppl 17, Oct. 23, 2001, p. II.185, XP009098219. |
| Margulies et al., Induction and Prevention of Radiocontrast-Induced Nephropathy in Dogs with Heart Failure, Kidney Int. 1990; vol. 38:1101-1108. |
| Masaki et al.; “In Situ Perfusion by Retrograde Cannulation of a Tumor Artery for Nephron-Sparing Surgery,” Int. J. Urol, vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 161-165, Jul. 1995. Abstract Only. |
| Mason et al., Renal Dysfunction After Arteriography, JAMA, 1985;253:1001-1004. |
| Mathis et al., “Use of Guide Catheter as a Temporary Stent During Microcatheter Intervention,” AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol, vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 932-933, May 1998. Abstract Only. |
| Mathur et al., “The effects of fenoldopam, a selective dopamine receptor agonist, on renal hemodynamics etc.”, abstract only; Crit Cre Med Sep. 1999: 27(9) 1832-1837. |
| Mathur, “The Role of the DA1 Receptor Agonist Fenoldopam in the Management of Critically III, Transplant, and Hypertensive Patients,” Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2003;4(Supp 1):S35-S40. |
| Mathur, V.S., “Pathophysiology of radiocontrast nephropathy and use of fenoldopam for its prevention”, Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 2, No. Suppl. 1, 2001, pp. 54-58, XP009098238. |
| Mccarthy, Animal Models in Medical Device Development and Qualification, Charles River Laboratories, vol. 10(2) 1997. |
| Mccullough, et al., Acute Renal Failure after Coronary Intervention: Incencence, Risk Factors, and Relationship to Mortality, Am J Med. 1997; 103:368-375. |
| Mehran, et al., “A Risk Score for Prediction of Contrast Induced nephropathy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention,” Retrieved from the Internet [Online]: www.abstractsonline.com/viewer, Mar. 31, 2003. |
| Mehta, et al., “Acute Kidney Injury Network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes of acute kidney injury,” Critical Care, 2007, 11:R31, pp. 1-8; available online at http://ccforum.com/content/11/2/R31. |
| Middleton, J. P.; “Ischemic Disease of the Kidney: How and Why to Consider Revascularization,” J. Nephrol., vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 123-136, May-Jun. 1998. Abstract Only. |
| Miller, et al., “Effects of Fenoldopam on Renal Blood Flow and Tubular Function Following Supraerenal Aortic Cross-Clamping,” Ann Vasc Surg, 2003, Published online Oct. 23, 2003. Abstract Only. |
| Mintz, et al., “Radiocontrast-Induced Nephropathy and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention,” Expert Opin. Pharmacother., 2003; 4(5):639-652. |
| Mueller et al. Prevention of Contrast Media Associated Nephropathy, Arch Intern Med, Feb. 2002, vol. 162 pp. 329-336. |
| Murray et al., “Clinical Anesthesiology: Third Edition.” McGraw-Hill Professional. New York. 2002. |
| Nohria et al. Medical Management of Advanced Heart Failure, JAMA, Feb. 6 2002, vol. 162, pp. 628-640. |
| Novick, A.C.; “Atherosclerotic Ischemic Nephropathy. Epidemiology and Clinical Considerations,” Urol. Clin. North Am., vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 195-200, May 1994. Abstract Only. |
| Paganini, et al., “Severity Scores and Outcomes With Acute Renal Failure in the ICU Setting,” Contrib Nephrol, 2001; 132: 181-195. |
| Parfrey, et al., Contrast Material-Induced Renal Failure in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus, Renal Insufficiency, or Both, N Engl J Med, 1989, 320:149-153. |
| Patel, et al., Intravenous Fenoldopam Infusion in Severe Heart Failure, Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1993; 7:97-101. |
| Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee, Fenoldopam Mesylate (Corlopam) Usage Guidelines:, Clinical Pharmacy Associates, Inc. Feb. 2001. http://www.clinpharm.com/client—data/productfiles/fenoldopam%20usage%20guidelines.pdf Access Nov. 29, 2007. |
| Pierce, “Fenoldopam (Corlopam) DUE”, Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committee, Jan. 2002, http://prodruginfo.com/Formulary/DUE/fenolddue.pdf, Accessed Sep. 12, 2007. |
| Postma, C.T. et al.; “Treatment of Renal Artery Stenosis with Intra-Arterial Stents,” Ned Tijdshr Genneeskd., vol. 142, No. 39, pp. 2132-2137, Sep. 26, 1998. Abstract Only. |
| Ramanathan, et al., Ameliorating Contrast-Induced Nephropathy, Journal of Invasive Cardiology, Nov. 2001, Retrieved from the Internet [Online]: www.invasivecardiology.comlfic—20011/jic—200111f6.html. |
| Rebeiz, et al., “Radiocontrast Nephropathy: a Time for Affirmative Action, J Invasive Cardiology,” Jan. 2003; vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 23-24. |
| Rihal, et al., “Incidence and Prognostic Importance of Acute Renal Failure After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention,” Circulation, (May 14, 2002),105:2259-2264. |
| Ritchie, et al., “Use of nonionic or Low Osmolar Contrast Agents in Cardiovascular Procedures,” Retrieved from the Internet [Online] www.acc.org/clinical/position/72543.htm, Jan. 22, 2003. |
| Robinson, et al., “Congestive Heart Failure: Targeted Drug Therapy and Invasive Interventions”, Retrieved from the Internet [Online] www.speroff.com/articiesITextbook/66—CHF2.htm, printed Sep. 4, 2002. |
| Rudnick, et al., Nephrotoxicity of Ionic and Noionic Contrast Media in 1196 Patients: A Randomized Trial, Kidney International, 1995; 47:254-261. |
| Schwab, et al., Contrast Nephrotoxicity: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Nonionic and an Ionic Radiographic Contrast Agent, N Engl J Med, 1989, 320:149-153. |
| Seiter, H. et al.; “Modified T-Catheter and its use for Transvenous Hypothermic in Situ Perfusion in the Surgical Restoration of the Kidney with Staghorn calculi,” Z. Uro Nephrol., vol. 76, No. 6, pp. 403-406, Jun. 1983. Abstract Only. |
| Sheifer, “Sex Differences in Coronary Atery Size”, American Heart Journal, 2000; 139(4):649-653. |
| Shusterman, et al., Fenoldopam, But Not Nitroprusside, Improves Renal Function etc. Am J of Medicine, 95:161-168 (1993). |
| Solomon, et al., Effects of Saline, Mannitol, and Furosemide on Acute Decreases in Renal Function etc., N Engl J Med 1994; vol. 331 No. 21 pp. 1416-1420. |
| Stevens, et al., A Prospective Randomized Trail of Prevention Measures in Patients at High Risk for Contrast Nephropathy, J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999; 33:403-411. |
| Stone, G.W. et al., “Designand rationale of CONTRAST—a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of fenoldopam mesylate for the prevention of radiocontrast nephropathy”, Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 2, No. Suppl.1, 2001, pp. 531-536, XP009098217. |
| Strick, et al., Direct Measurement of Renal Medullary Blood Flow in the Dog, Am J. Physiol. 267 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 36): R253-R2259, 1994. |
| Suehiro, et al., “Selective Renal Vasodilation and Active Renal Artery Perfusion Improve Renal Function in Dogs with Acute Heart Failure,” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 298, No. 3 pp. 1154-1160 (2001). |
| Taliercio, et al., Risks for Renal Dysfunction with Cardiac Angiography, Annals of Internal Medicine, 1986; 104:501-504. |
| Thatipelli et al., “CT Angiography of Renal Artery Anatomy for Evaluating Embolic Protection Devices.” Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2007; 18(7): 842-846. |
| Thomas, et al., Glomerrular Filtration Dynamics During Renal Vasodilation etc. Am. J. Physiol. 244:F606-F611 (1983). |
| Thomas, et al., Influence of Bradykinin and Papaverine on Renal etc., Renal Physiology, Basel 5:197-205 (1982). |
| Tumlin et al., “A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of fenoldopam meysylate in the prevention of radiocontrast nephropathy in patients with moderate to severe renal insufficiency” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Vo. 11, Sep. 2000, p. 135A, XP009098223. |
| Tumlin et al., “Fenoldopam Mesylate Blocks Reductions in Renal Plasma Flow After Radiocontrast Dye Infusion: A Pilot Trial in the Prevention of Contrast Nephropathy,” The American Heart Journal, 2002; 143:5:894-903. |
| Uic College of Pharmacy, “Is Fenoldopam (Corlopam) Useful for the Prevention of Contrast Media Associated Nephrotoxicity?”, Retrieved from the Internet [Online] www.uic.edu/pharmacy/services/di/fenoldopam.htm, Jan. 2003. |
| Umrani et al., Beneficial effects of fenoldopam treatment on renal function in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats, Clin Exp Hypertens, Apr. 24, 2002 (3): 207-19 Abstract only. |
| Van Der Zander et al., “Hypertension: Does Brain Natriuretic Paptide Have a Direct Renal Effect in Human Hypertensives?”, American Heart Association, 2003, 41, 119-123. |
| Vari, et al., Induction, Prevention and Mechanisms of Contrast Media-Induced Acute Renal Failure, Kidney International, 1988; 33:669-707. |
| Venkatamaran, “Prevention of acute renal failure,” Crit. Care Clin., 2005, 21(2), 281-289 (abstract). |
| Walker, H.S. et al.; “Use of a Balloon-Tipped Profusion Catheter for Renal Preservation During Suprarenal Abdominal Aortic Operations,” J. Vasc. Surg., vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 337-339, Mar. 1985. Abstract Only. |
| Weisberg et al., Risk of radiocontrast nephropathy in patients with and without diabetes mellutus, Kidney International, 1994, 45:259-265. |
| White, C.J. et al.; “Renal Artery Stent Placement: Utility in Lesions Difficult to Treat with Balloon Angioplasty,” Am. Coll. Cardiol., vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 1445-1450, Nov. 15, 1997. Abstract Only. |
| Williams, D.M. et al.; “Design and Testing of a High-FLo2 Autoperfusion Catheter: An Experimental Study,” J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol., vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 285-290, May, 1992. Abstract Only. |
| Zacherl, et al. Periarterial Papverine Applications Improves Intraoperative Kidney Function etc. Journal of Surgical Research 103:268-271 (2002). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080154236 A1 | Jun 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60502389 | Sep 2003 | US | |
| 60479329 | Jun 2003 | US | |
| 60412343 | Sep 2002 | US | |
| 60412476 | Sep 2002 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11084434 | Mar 2005 | US |
| Child | 12044230 | US | |
| Parent | PCT/US03/29995 | Sep 2003 | US |
| Child | 11084434 | US |
