This invention relates generally to electrical switchgear and more particularly, to a method and apparatus for protecting, monitoring, and controlling the electrical switchgear.
In an industrial power distribution system, power generated by a power generation company may be supplied to an industrial or commercial facility wherein the power may be distributed throughout the industrial or commercial facility to various equipment such as, for example, motors, welding machinery, computers, heaters, lighting, and other electrical equipment. At least some known power distribution systems include switchgear, which facilitates dividing the power into branch circuits, which supply power to various portions of the industrial facility. Circuit breakers are provided in each branch circuit to facilitate protecting equipment within the branch circuit. Additionally, circuit breakers in each branch circuit can facilitate minimizing equipment failures since specific loads may be energized or de-energized without affecting other loads, thus creating increased efficiencies, and reduced operating and manufacturing costs. Similar switchgear may also be used within an electric utility transmission system and a plurality of distribution substations, although the switching operations used may be more complex.
Switchgear typically include multiple devices, other than the power distribution system components, to facilitate providing protection, monitoring, and control of the power distribution system components. For example, at least some known breakers include a plurality of shunt trip circuits, under-voltage relays, trip units, and a plurality of auxiliary switches that close the breaker in the event of an undesired interruption or fluctuation in the power supplied to the power distribution components. Additionally, at least one known power distribution system also includes a monitor device that monitors a performance of the power distribution system, a control device that controls an operation of the power distribution system, and a protection device that initiates a protective response when the protection device is activated.
In at least some other known power distribution systems, a monitor and control system operates independently of the protective system. For example, a protective device may de-energize a portion of the power distribution system based on its own predetermined operating limits, without the monitoring devices recording the event. The failure of the monitoring system to record the system shutdown may mislead an operator to believe that an over-current condition has not occurred within the power distribution system, and as such, a proper corrective action may not be initiated by the operator. Additionally, a protective device, i.e. a circuit breaker, may open because of an over-current condition in the power distribution system, but the control system may interpret the over-current condition as a loss of power from the power source, rather than a fault condition. As such, the control logic may undesirably attempt to connect the faulted circuit to an alternate source, thereby restoring the over-current condition. In addition to the potential increase in operational defects which may occur using such devices, the use of multiple devices and interconnecting wiring associated with the devices may cause an increase in equipment size, an increase in the complexity of wiring the devices, and/or an increase in a quantity of devices installed.
In some known switchgear control and protection systems, all relaying monitoring, control and protection functions are performed locally within a trip unit in a switchgear circuit breaker. This arrangement is implemented with a plurality of point-to-point wiring and dedicated equipment and provides for tight latency between monitored parameters and protective functions based on those parameters. A centralized control architecture will need to at least duplicate the latencies of the present systems to provide similar fault clearing protective features.
In one aspect, a method of monitoring and controlling a power distribution system is provided wherein the power distribution system includes a plurality of circuit breakers, a plurality of node electronic units wherein each node electronic unit is mounted remotely from an associated circuit breaker, such that, each associated circuit breaker is electrically coupled with each respective node electronic unit, at least one digital network, and at least one central control processing unit (CCPU) wherein each CCPU includes a first power system global information set, and is communicatively coupled through a respective one of the at least one network to the plurality of node electronic units. The method includes transmitting at least one digital message from each node electronic unit to each CCPU over a respective network, determining an operational state of the power distribution system from the unicast message, and transmitting at least one multicast message from each CCPU to each node electronic unit such that the circuit breakers are operable from each CCPU.
In another aspect, a centralized power distribution system is provided. The system includes at least one digital network communicatively coupled to at least one central control processing unit (CCPU), wherein a number of the at least one digital network is equal to a number of at least one CCPU, the at least one CCPU and at least one digital network configured as redundant networks, and a plurality of node electronic units wherein each node electronic unit is communicatively coupled to each redundant network, and each node electronics unit is coupled to an associated circuit breaker wherein each node electronics unit is configured to receive signals from the associated circuit breaker, and transmit signals to the associated circuit breaker.
As used herein, an element or step recited in the singular and preceded with the word “a” or “an” should be understood as not excluding plural said elements or steps, unless such exclusion is explicitly recited. Furthermore, references to “one embodiment” of the present invention are not intended to be interpreted as excluding the existence of additional embodiments that also incorporate the recited features.
In use, power is supplied to a main feed system 12, i.e. a switchboard for example, from a source (not shown) such as, but not limited to, a steam turbine, powered from, for example, a nuclear reactor or a coal fired boiler, a gas turbine generator, and a diesel generator. Power supplied to main feed system 12 is divided into a plurality of branch circuits using circuit breakers 16 which supply power to various loads 18 in the industrial facility. In addition, circuit breakers 16 are provided in each branch circuit to facilitate protecting equipment, i.e. loads 18, connected within the respective branch circuit. Additionally, circuit breakers 16 facilitate minimizing equipment failures since specific loads 18 may be energized or de-energized without affecting other loads 18, thus creating increased efficiencies, and reduced operating and manufacturing costs.
Power distribution system 10 includes a circuit breaker control protection system 19 that includes a plurality of node electronics units 20 that are each electrically coupled to a digital network 22. Circuit breaker control protection system 19 also includes at least one central control processing unit (CCPU) 24 that is electrically coupled to digital network 22 via a switch 23 such as, but not limited to, an Ethernet switch 23. In use, each respective node electronics unit 20 is electrically coupled to a respective circuit breaker 16, such that CCPU 24 is electrically coupled to each circuit breaker 16 through digital network 22 and through an associated node electronics unit 20.
In the exemplary embodiment, digital network 22 is a Fast Ethernet protocol network. In another embodiment, digital network 22 includes, for example, at least one of a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), dial-in-connections, cable modems, and special high-speed ISDN lines. Digital network 22 also includes any device capable of interconnecting to the Internet including a web-based phone, personal digital assistant (PDA), or other web-based connectable equipment. It should be appreciated that the digital network 22 network is upgradeable based on future revisions to IEEE 802.3(u) and its successors. It should further be appreciated that the digital network 22 is configurable, for example, in a star topology.
In one embodiment, CCPU 24 is a computer and includes a device 26, for example, a floppy disk drive or CD-ROM drive, to facilitate reading instructions and/or data from a computer-readable medium 28, such as a floppy disk or CD-ROM. In another embodiment, CCPU 24 executes instructions stored in firmware (not shown). CCPU 24 is programmed to perform functions described herein, but other programmable circuits can likewise be programmed. Accordingly, as used herein, the term computer is not limited to just those integrated circuits referred to in the art as computers, but broadly refers to computers, processors, microcontrollers, microcomputers, programmable logic controllers, application specific integrated circuits, and other programmable circuits. Additionally, although described in a power distribution setting, it is contemplated that the benefits of the invention accrue to all electrical distribution systems including industrial systems such as, for example, but not limited to, an electrical distribution system installed in an office building.
Additionally, in an exemplary embodiment, internal bus 50 includes an address bus, a data bus, and a control bus. In use, the address bus is configured to enable CPU 48 to address a plurality of internal memory locations or an input/output port, such as, but not limited to communications interface 52 through communications processor 54, and a gateway interface 57, through a gateway processor 58. The data bus is configured to transmit instructions and/or data between CPU 48 and at least one input/output, and the control bus is configured to transmit signals between the plurality of devices to facilitate ensuring that the devices are operating in synchronization. In the exemplary embodiment, internal bus 50 is a bi-directional bus such that signals can be transmitted in either direction on internal bus 50. CCPU 24 also includes at least one storage device 60 configured to store a plurality of information transmitted via internal bus 50.
In use, gateway interface 57 communicates to a remote workstation (not shown) via an Internet link 62 or an Intranet 62. In the exemplary embodiment, the remote workstation is a personal computer including a web browser. Although a single workstation is described, such functions as described herein can be performed at one of many personal computers coupled to gateway interface 57. For example, gateway interface 57 may be communicatively coupled to various individuals, including local operators and to third parties, e.g., remote system operators via an ISP Internet connection. The communication in the example embodiment is illustrated as being performed via the Internet, however, any other wide area network (WAN) type communication can be utilized in other embodiments, i.e., the systems and processes are not limited to being practiced via the Internet. In one embodiment, information is received at gateway interface 57 and transmitted to node electronics unit 20 via CCPU 24 and digital network 22. In another embodiment, information sent from node electronics unit 20 is received at communication interface 52 and transmitted to Internet 62 via gateway interface 57.
In one embodiment, node electronics unit 20 receives signals input from a plurality of devices, such as, but not limited to, a current sensor 82, a voltage sensor 84, and/or circuit breaker 16. Status signals from circuit breaker 16 can include signals related to one or more conditions of the breaker, such as, but not limited to, an auxiliary switch status, and a spring charge switch status. Additionally, node electronics unit 20 sends signals to at least circuit breaker 16 in order to control one or more states of the breaker.
In use, signals are transmitted to CCPU 24 via node electronics unit 20, and digital network 22. Node electronics unit 20 receives the signals and packages a digital message that includes the signals and additional data relating to a health and status of node electronics unit 20. The health and status data may include information based on problems found by internal diagnostic routines and a status of self checking routines that run locally in node electronics unit 20. CCPU 24 processes digital message using one or more protection algorithms, monitoring algorithms, and any combination thereof. In response to the processing of digital message, CCPU 24 sends digital message back to node electronics unit 20 via digital network 22. In the exemplary embodiment, node electronics unit 20 actuates circuit breaker 16 via signal in response to digital message received from CCPU 24. In one embodiment, circuit breaker 16 is actuated in response to commands sent only by CCPU 24, i.e., circuit breaker 16 is not controlled locally by node electronics unit 20, but rather is operated remotely from CCPU 24 based on digital message received from node electronics unit 20 over network 22.
Circuit breaker 16 is in electrical communication with node electronics unit 20 through a wiring harness, which may include copper wiring, communications conduits, and any combination thereof. Current sensor 82, and voltage sensor 84 are in electrical communication with node electronics unit 20 through a cable that may include copper wiring, communications conduits, and any combination thereof. In an exemplary embodiment, circuit breaker 16 is a unitary device mounted proximate to node electronics unit 20, current sensor 82, and voltage sensor 84.
In use, actuation signals from node electronics unit 20 are transmitted to circuit breaker 16 to actuate a plurality of functions in circuit breaker 16, such as, but not limited to, operating a trip coil 100, operating a close coil 102, and affecting a circuit breaker lockout feature. An auxiliary switch 104 and operating spring charge switch 106 provide a status indication of circuit breaker parameters to node electronics unit 20. Motor 108 is configured to recharge an operating spring, configured as a close spring (not shown) after circuit breaker 16 closes. It should be appreciated that the motor 108 can include, for example, a spring charge switch, a solenoid or any other electro-mechanical device capable of recharging a trip spring. To close circuit breaker 16, a close coil 102 is energized by a close signal from actuation power module (not shown). Close coil 102 actuates a closing mechanism (not shown) that couples at least one movable electrical contact (not shown) to a corresponding fixed electrical contact (not shown). The closing mechanism of circuit breaker 16 latches in a closed position such that when close coil 102 is de-energized, circuit breaker 16 remains closed. When breaker 16 closes, an “a” contact of auxiliary switch 104 also closes and a “b” contact of auxiliary switch 104 opens. The position of the “a” and “b” contacts is sensed by node electronics unit 20. To open circuit breaker 16, node electronics unit 20 energizes trip coil (TC) 100. TC 100 acts directly on circuit breaker 16 to release the latching mechanism that holds circuit breaker 16 closed. When the latching mechanism is released, circuit breaker 16 will open, opening the “a” contact and closing the “b” contact of auxiliary switch 104. Trip coil 100 is then de-energized by node electronics unit 20. After breaker 16 opens, with the close spring recharged by motor 108, circuit breaker 16 is prepared for a next operating cycle. In the exemplary embodiment, each node electronics unit 20 is coupled to circuit breaker 16 in a one-to-one correspondence. For example, each node electronics unit 20 communicates directly with only one circuit breaker 16. In an alternative embodiment, node electronics unit 20 may communicate with a plurality of circuit breakers 16.
Optimized centralized control architecture 600 includes a dual redundant main power subsystem 602 that includes two uninterruptible power supplies (UPS) configured to supply the control power needs of the control components of power distribution system 10. Each UPS 30 is electrically coupled to two of user's power sources 604 of a predetermined reliability and availability through a pair of power connections 606. Each UPS 30 supplies control power to two control power buses 608 and 609, respectively. Each UPS 30 includes two output power connections 610, one power connection 610 from each UPS 30 is electrically coupled to control power bus 608 and the other power connection 610 is electrically coupled to 609. In the exemplary embodiment, only one UPS 30 supplies each bus 608 and 609 at a time. In case of an error in one UPS 30, the other UPS 30 will sense the loss of control power on bus 608 or 609 and may respond by energizing the bus experiencing the loss of power. In one embodiment, if the loss of power on control power bus 608 or 609 is due to a fault on the bus, UPS 30 will sense the fault and will not attempt to energize the faulted bus 608 or 609. In an alternative embodiment, CCPU 24 may sense the fault, and command UPS 30 to not attempt to energize the faulted bus 608 or 609.
Buses 608 and 609 supply each control component of power distribution system 10 in a dual redundant manner. In the exemplary embodiment, buses 608 and 609 are cables that run proximate each other to all components in power distribution system 10. In an alternative embodiment, buses 608 and 609 may be run separately to facilitate preventing a common mode failure from disabling both control power buses 608 and 609. Each component in power distribution system 10 includes two input power connections 612 wherein one power connection 612 electrically couples to one of buses 608 and 609.
Optimized centralized control architecture 600 includes dual redundant network 22. Each network 22 communicatively couples to a network switch through a communication connection 614 and to a communication connection 616 on each node electronics unit 20. Only one node electronics unit 20 is illustrated in
Network switch 23 includes two input communication connections 620 each input each input communication connection 620 is communicatively coupled to an output communications connection 622 on each of CCPU 24. In the exemplary embodiment, each output communication connection 622 is coupled to a CCPU communication interface 624. In an alternative embodiment, each input communication connection 620 is communicatively coupled to only one switch 23, thus segregating each CCPU 24 to only one network. In another alternative embodiment, switches 23 are communicatively coupled, thus each switch 23 will appear as a node on each network associated with the other switch 23. Each embodiment, of the network configuration addresses particular concerns regarding reliability and availability associated with a particular power distribution system 10 application. As such one configuration may be selected over another based on a user's requirements, industry standards for the application and/or cost considerations.
Each node electronics unit 20 is coupled to a separately located circuit breaker 16 through a standard wiring harness 110 and coupled to multi-phase voltage sensor 82 and multi-phase current sensor 84 through cable 112. Circuit breaker 16 is operable to open and close a path of current flow from a (source) to a load (not shown) through power connections 626 and 628.
In operation, all node electronics units 20 receive input from only sensors associated with one circuit breaker 16. The received data is transmitted to each CCPU 24 through network 22 and switch 23. The broadcast message from node electronics unit 20 to CCPU 24 is a unicast message intended only for receipt by each CCPU 24. Network 22 and switch 23 are dual redundant components optimized to provide a predetermined reliability and availability goal. Each CCPU 24 receives all unicast messages from all node electronics units 20 operating on power distribution system 10. Having all system state information available in one location permits CCPU 24 to calculate commands and actions to be sent to all node electronics units 20 based on the global information set. this contrast with known power distribution systems where circuit breaker control actions are based on local parameters or a limited number of components hardwired to a separate relay or trip unit. The determined commands and actions for all node electronics units 20 are package into a multicast message and sent via high-speed network 22 and switches 23 to all node electronics units 20. Each node electronics unit 20 receives each CCPU 24 message and parses the portion of the message addressed to it, and implements the commands and actions sent from CCPU 24. Since each node electronics unit 20 receives two messages, one from each CCPU 24, there may be a conflict between the commands and actions sent from each CCPU 24. Each node electronics unit 20 is programmed to resolve potential conflicts between commands and actions sent from both CCPUs 24. In the exemplary embodiment, a voting conflict resolution algorithm is not used, but rather node electronics unit 20 selects the safer of the two commands and generates actuation commands it then sends to its associated circuit breaker 16. In the exemplary embodiment, power distribution system 10 control components are dual redundant and node electronics unit 20 and circuit breaker 16 components are singular. In an alternative embodiment, power distribution system 10 control components may be configured to a different level of redundancy to accommodate a specific application.
In the exemplary embodiment, each CCPU 24 is operating in a real-time environment wherein an operating system utilized by CCPU 24 is a real-time operating system such as Linux with RTLinux. Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds of Helsinki, Finland. RTLinux is a registered trademark of Finite State Machine Labs, Inc. of Socorro, N. Mex.
In the exemplary embodiment, each CCPU 24 is configured to synchronize its internal clock with respect to time to all other CCPUs internal clocks based on a determination of a relative difference in clock speed between it and each other CCPU 24. Each CCPU 24 determines the relative difference between its internal clock and the internal clocks of all other CCPUs 24 based on the messages transmitted to the node electronics units 20 and the messages received from node electronics units 20.
The above-described centralized control architecture system is cost-effective and highly reliable. Each system includes at least one central control processor unit (CCPU) and networked devices to facilitate protecting a set of switchgear. The networked devices proximate each circuit breaker monitor voltage and current signals from sensors also located proximate each circuit breaker. The CCPU receives all monitored signals from all devices over the high-speed network. The CCPU implements protection and optimization algorithms for each circuit breaker node electronics unit based on global voltage and current signals. This method offers performance advantages over existing local, non-networked protection. In many overcurrent faults, the fault level may appear at multiple levels in the electrical protection hierarchy. Branch, feeder and main circuit breakers may all “see” the fault. Protection engineers can partially avoid the problem by setting longer delays. This results in faults at high levels in the hierarchy causing more damage and still can result in multiple devices interrupting, removing electrical service from circuits that do not have a fault. Accordingly, the power distribution system facilitates protection and optimization of power system operation in a cost-effective and reliable manner.
Exemplary embodiments of power distribution system components are described above in detail. The components are not limited to the specific embodiments described herein, but rather, components of each system may be utilized independently and separately from other components described herein. Each power distribution system component can also be used in combination with other power distribution system components.
While the invention has been described in terms of various specific embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the claims.
This application is related to U.S. Patent Application No. 60/359,544 filed on Feb. 25, 2002 for “Integrated Protection, Monitoring, and Control” the content of which is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference. This application is also related to U.S. Patent Application No. 60/438,159 filed on Jan. 6, 2003 for “Single Processor Concept for Protection and Control of Circuit Breakers in Low-Voltage Switchgear” the content of which is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3772505 | Massell | Nov 1973 | A |
3938007 | Boniger et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3956671 | Nimmersjo | May 1976 | A |
3963964 | Mustaphi | Jun 1976 | A |
4001742 | Jencks et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4245318 | Eckart et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4291299 | Hinz et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4301433 | Castonguay et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4311919 | Nail | Jan 1982 | A |
4415968 | Maeda et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4423459 | Stich et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4432031 | Premerlani | Feb 1984 | A |
4455612 | Girgis et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4468714 | Russell | Aug 1984 | A |
4589074 | Thomas et al. | May 1986 | A |
4623949 | Salowe et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4631625 | Alexander et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4642724 | Ruta | Feb 1987 | A |
4652966 | Farag et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4672501 | Bilac et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4672555 | Hart et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4674062 | Premerlani | Jun 1987 | A |
4689712 | Demeyer | Aug 1987 | A |
4709339 | Fernandes | Nov 1987 | A |
4751653 | Junk et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4752853 | Matsko et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4754407 | Nolan | Jun 1988 | A |
4777607 | Maury et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4783748 | Swarztrauber et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4796027 | Smith-Vaniz | Jan 1989 | A |
4833592 | Yamanaka | May 1989 | A |
4849848 | Ishii | Jul 1989 | A |
4855671 | Fernandes | Aug 1989 | A |
4862308 | Udren | Aug 1989 | A |
4964058 | Brown, Jr. | Oct 1990 | A |
4979122 | Davis et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4983955 | Ham, Jr. et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4996646 | Farrington | Feb 1991 | A |
5053735 | Ohishi et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5060166 | Engel et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5101191 | MacFadyen et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5134691 | Elms | Jul 1992 | A |
5136458 | Durivage, III | Aug 1992 | A |
5162664 | Haun et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5166887 | Farrington et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5170310 | Studtmann et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5170360 | Porter et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5179376 | Pomatto | Jan 1993 | A |
5182547 | Griffith | Jan 1993 | A |
5185705 | Farrington | Feb 1993 | A |
5196831 | Bscheider | Mar 1993 | A |
5214560 | Jensen | May 1993 | A |
5216621 | Dickens | Jun 1993 | A |
5225994 | Arinobu et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5231565 | Bilas et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5237511 | Caird et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5247454 | Farrington et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5253159 | Bilas et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5272438 | Stumme | Dec 1993 | A |
5301121 | Garverick et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5305174 | Morita et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5311392 | Kinney et al. | May 1994 | A |
5323307 | Wolf et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5349644 | Massey et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5353188 | Hatakeyama | Oct 1994 | A |
5361184 | El-Sharkawi et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5367427 | Matsko et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5369356 | Kinney et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5381554 | Langer et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5384712 | Oravetz et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5402299 | Bellei | Mar 1995 | A |
5406495 | Hill | Apr 1995 | A |
5414635 | Ohta | May 1995 | A |
5420799 | Peterson et al. | May 1995 | A |
5422778 | Good et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5440441 | Ahuja | Aug 1995 | A |
5451879 | Moore | Sep 1995 | A |
5487016 | Elms | Jan 1996 | A |
5490086 | Leone et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5493468 | Hunter et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5530738 | McEachern | Jun 1996 | A |
5534782 | Nourse | Jul 1996 | A |
5534833 | Castonguay et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5537327 | Snow et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5544065 | Engel et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5559719 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5560022 | Dunstan et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5576625 | Sukegawa et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581471 | McEachern et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5587917 | Elms | Dec 1996 | A |
5596473 | Johnson et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600527 | Engel et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5608646 | Pomatto | Mar 1997 | A |
5613798 | Braverman | Mar 1997 | A |
5619392 | Bertsch et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5627716 | Lagree et al. | May 1997 | A |
5627717 | Pein et al. | May 1997 | A |
5627718 | Engel et al. | May 1997 | A |
5629825 | Wallis et al. | May 1997 | A |
5631798 | Seymour et al. | May 1997 | A |
5638296 | Johnson et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5650936 | Loucks et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5661658 | Putt et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5666256 | Zavis et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5670923 | Gonzalez et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5694329 | Pomatto | Dec 1997 | A |
5696695 | Ehlers et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5719738 | Singer et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5734576 | Klancher | Mar 1998 | A |
5736847 | Van Doorn et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5737231 | Pyle et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742513 | Bouhenguel et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751524 | Swindler | May 1998 | A |
5754033 | Thomson | May 1998 | A |
5754440 | Cox et al. | May 1998 | A |
5768148 | Murphy et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5784237 | Velez | Jul 1998 | A |
5784243 | Pollman et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5786699 | Sukegawa et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5812389 | Katayama et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5821704 | Carson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825643 | Dvorak et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828576 | Loucks et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828983 | Lombardi | Oct 1998 | A |
5831428 | Pyle et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5867385 | Brown et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872722 | Oravetz et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872785 | Kienberger | Feb 1999 | A |
5890097 | Cox | Mar 1999 | A |
5892449 | Reid et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903426 | Ehling | May 1999 | A |
5905616 | Lyke | May 1999 | A |
5906271 | Castonguay et al. | May 1999 | A |
5924486 | Ehlers et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926089 | Sekiguchi et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5936817 | Matsko et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946210 | Montminy et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5958060 | Premerlani | Sep 1999 | A |
5963457 | Kanoi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5973481 | Thompson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5973899 | Williams et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5982595 | Pozzuoli | Nov 1999 | A |
5982596 | Spencer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995911 | Hart | Nov 1999 | A |
6005757 | Shvach et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005758 | Spencer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6018451 | Lyke et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6038516 | Alexander et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047321 | Raab et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6054661 | Castonguay et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055145 | Lagree et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061609 | Kanoi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6084758 | Clarey et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6138241 | Eckel et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139327 | Callahan et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141196 | Premerlani et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6157527 | Spencer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167329 | Engel et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6175780 | Engel | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185482 | Egolf et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6185508 | Van Doorn et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6186842 | Hirschbold et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195243 | Spencer et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198402 | Hasegawa et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212049 | Spencer et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233128 | Spencer et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236949 | Hart | May 2001 | B1 |
6242703 | Castonguay et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6268991 | Criniti et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285917 | Sekiguchi et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6288882 | DiSalvo et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289267 | Alexander et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291911 | Dunk et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292340 | O'Regan et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292717 | Alexander et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292901 | Lys et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297939 | Bilac et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6313975 | Dunne et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6341054 | Walder et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347027 | Nelson et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351823 | Mayer et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356422 | Bilac et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356849 | Jaffe | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6369996 | Bo | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377051 | Tyner et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385022 | Kulidjian et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396279 | Gruenert | May 2002 | B1 |
6397155 | Przydatek et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405104 | Dougherty | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406328 | Attarian et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411865 | Qin et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6441931 | Moskovich et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459997 | Andersen | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6496342 | Horvath et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6535797 | Bowles et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549880 | Willoughby et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553418 | Collins et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
20010010032 | Ehlers et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010032025 | Lenz et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010044588 | Mault | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010048354 | Douville et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010055965 | Delp et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020010518 | Reid et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020032535 | Alexander et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020034086 | Scoggins et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020045992 | Shincovich et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020059401 | Austin | May 2002 | A1 |
20020063635 | Shincovich | May 2002 | A1 |
20020064010 | Nelson et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020091949 | Ykema | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020094799 | Elliott et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107615 | Bjorklund | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020108065 | Mares | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020109722 | Rogers et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111980 | Miller et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116092 | Hamamatsu et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020124011 | Baxter et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020146076 | Lee | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020146083 | Lee et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147503 | Osburn, III | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159402 | Binder | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162014 | Przydatek et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163918 | Cline | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020165677 | Lightbody et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020181174 | Bilac et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193888 | Wewalaarachchi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030043785 | Liu, et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0718948 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0723325 | Jul 1996 | EP |
0949734 | Oct 1999 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040024475 A1 | Feb 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60359544 | Feb 2002 | US | |
60438159 | Jan 2003 | US |