Method and apparatus for reducing impurities in cellulose fibers for manufacture of fiber reinforced cement composite materials

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8133352
  • Patent Number
    8,133,352
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, October 2, 2001
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 13, 2012
    12 years ago
Abstract
A method of manufacturing high purity fiber cement grades of cellulose fibers is described. Additional washing steps, coupled with an elevated temperature, are used in the process to extensively wash the pulps and remove substantially all COD components remaining in the pulps. The pulps are counter-currently washed by diffusion and dewatering at elevated temperatures following the brown stock washer systems. During the additional washing steps, the pulps are soaked in counter-current heated water for a pre-determined time and some chemicals may be introduced to chemically break down the COD components in the pulps and to make them more soluble in the aqueous solution. The additional washing steps can be performed using existing equipment at conventional pulp mills. A formulation and a process of making fiber reinforced cement composite materials are also described using the low COD and high purity cellulose fibers. The pulps with lower COD contents have superior performance in manufacture of fiber reinforced cement composite materials. A smaller amount of the low COD and high purity fibers is needed to achieve the same reinforcement efficiency, compared to regular cellulose fibers.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


This invention relates to cellulose fibers, and more particularly, to a method of reducing impurities in cellulose fibers. This invention also discloses the formulations, methods of manufacture and final products of cellulose fiber reinforced cement composite materials using low impurity cellulose fibers.


2. Description of the Related Art


Fiber-reinforced products such as building sheets, panels, planks, and roofing material have been used in the building construction for more than one hundred years. The reinforcement fibers used in such building products include asbestos fibers, cellulose fibers such as those described in Australian Patent No. 515151 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,030,447, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference, metal fibers, and glass fibers and other natural and synthetic fibers. Presently, cellulose is one of the preferred fibers used in most commercial fiber-reinforced building materials because cellulose fiber is an effective, low cost, recyclable natural product compatible with most conventional fiber cement manufacturing processes, including refining and autoclaving.


However, the properties and performance characteristics of most fiber reinforced cement composite materials are highly dependent on the quality of the fibers used. For example, cellulose fibers sometimes contain impurities that can adversely affect the fiber cement composite properties. In particular, harmful organic compounds are sometimes trapped inside the pores and cavities of the cellulose pulp during the pulping process. These organic compounds include lignin and other aromatic components, wood sugar compounds including hextoses (glucose, mannose, and galactose) and pentoses (xylose and arabinose), wood sugar derivatives such as gluconic acid and mannonic acids, fatty acids, resin acids, other organic compounds from wood including extractives and degradation fragments of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. In addition to organic compounds, the impurities may also include small amounts of inorganic compounds that are oxidized. These impurities are sometimes collectively referred to as Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) components.


Each COD component has a certain degree of negative impact on fiber cement reactions, particularly the cement hydration process. The collective effect of all COD compounds released from the pulp in the manufacture of fiber cement composite materials can significantly weaken the bonding between cellulose fibers and other inorganic ingredients in the fiber cement matrix, in which cellulose fibers are typically used as the reinforcement agent. This phenomenon is sometimes referred to as cement poisoning. Moreover, accumulation of the COD impurities released from the pulp can severely contaminate the process water during the manufacture of the fiber reinforced cement composite materials. These adverse effects associated with COD impurities can ultimately result in failure of the final fiber cement products.


To address these problems, most conventional pulp manufacturing processes include a series of cleaning steps that are designed to remove residual chemicals and degraded wood components contained in the pulp. During these cleaning steps, the pulp is typically washed in a series of vacuum, rotary or pressure brown stock washers at a temperature of about 55° C. to 65° C. to remove the residual chemicals from the pulp. However, these processes often fail to remove all COD impurities from the cellulose pulp because of the relatively short retention time and limited washing efficiency. In many cases, a large amount of COD substances remains trapped inside the cavities (lumens) and pores of the fiber cell walls and are carried over to the fiber cement manufacturing processes, which can detrimentally affect the properties of the final product and severely contaminate the process water.


Hence, from the foregoing, it will be appreciated that there is a need for a process that removes substantially all impurities from cellulose fibers during the pulping process. There is also a need for a process of manufacturing low impurity and high performance cellulose fibers for fiber reinforced cement composite materials. To this end, there is a particular need for a cellulose pulp manufacturing process that significantly reduces the amount of COD components in the pulp and can be implemented by using conventional pulp manufacturing equipment.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one aspect, the preferred embodiments of the present invention disclose a process of making low impurity and high performance fibers for cellulose fiber reinforced cement composite materials. The preferred process comprises processing the fibers in an aqueous solution for a predetermined retention time under elevated temperature conditions and providing agitation to the solution so as to facilitate diffusion of impurities from the pores and lumens of the fibers. In one embodiment, the fibers are soaked and washed counter-currently in the solution. Preferably, the solution temperature is between about 65° C. to 120° C. Preferably, the retention time is between about 1 to 36 hours. In one embodiment, processing the fibers comprises soaking the fibers in a series of washing systems, preferably, for about 30 minutes to 2 hours in each of the series of washing systems.


In another embodiment, processing the fibers comprises soaking the fibers in up to six reactors. The reactors may be bleaching towers or a series of continuous plug flow bleaching reactors. The fibers can be soaked in a bleaching reactors followed by soaking in a bleached stock washer. Preferably, the process removes a large portion of the impurities, such as COD compounds, from the pulps. In one embodiment, processing the fibers comprises introducing at least one chemical to the solution, wherein the chemical reacts with the COD compounds and causes the compounds to become more soluble in the aqueous solution. The chemicals can be selected from the group consisting of chemicals comprising oxygen, ozone, hydrogen peroxide, and mixtures thereof. Furthermore, the fibers can be washed in a brown stock washer system, preferably at an elevated temperature of greater than about 65° C., prior to processing the fibers. Preferably, the pulps are maintained at a pulp consistency of about 1% to 30%. During the prolonged soaking cycles, impurities in the pulps will diffuse from inside of the fiber cell walls driven by the concentration gradients. Furthermore, elevated temperatures also significantly increase the diffusion transportation rate of the impurities.


The process of the preferred embodiments can be carried out using various schemes and equipment systems such as existing bleaching and washing system in most pulp mills. Preferably, the washing systems are selected from the group consisting of washers, storage tanks, reactors, mixers, agitators, pumps, centrifuges, and filter presses. The washing systems may include bleaching reactors, bleached stock washers, pulp transport pumps, pulp dispersion/diffusion screw feeders, stock mixers and agitators, bleached stock storage towers, and bleached stock deckers.


The process described herein is particularly innovative because the conventional wisdom in the fiber processing industry actually teaches away from the use of high temperature, lengthy soaking cycles and mechanical agitation in cleaning pulps for the applications in the fiber cement composite material. It is generally believed that high temperature, prolonged soaking, and mechanical actions will reduce the fiber strengths, such as tensile strengths. Contrary to customary wisdom, preferred embodiments of this invention show that washing pulps at an elevated temperature under preferred conditions can effectively remove more impurities from the fiber pulps without compromising the fiber strength and other desirable fiber properties. For example, COD contents in the pulps processed by the preferred methods can be reduced by more than about 40%, resulting in a COD content of less than about 5 kg/ton of oven dry fiber. Application of the high purity fiber with a COD content of less than about 5 kg/ton of pulp in the manufacture of fiber reinforced cement composite materials actually improves the physical and mechanical properties of the fiber cement composite materials, such as modulus of rupture (MOR), modulus of elasticity (MOE), ultimate strain and toughness energy. Furthermore, use of the low COD fibers can also greatly reduce contamination of the process water during the manufacture of fiber reinforced cement composite materials.


Advantageously, the process of the preferred embodiments provides a cost effective method of removing substantially all impurities, such as COD components, from the fibers. The process can be performed using existing equipment available in most pulp mills. Furthermore, application of this process in the manufacture of fiber cement grade pulps can reduce the COD content by up to one half or more without degrading the physical and mechanical properties of the fibers. Use of the low COD pulp in the manufacture of fiber cement composite materials will result in less contamination to the process water and reduce the fresh water usage.


The preferred embodiments of the present invention also disclose a formulation for making fiber reinforced cement composite materials with low COD fibers. One preferred formulation of the present invention is as follows:

    • about 2% to 20% low COD cellulose fibers (or a combination of low COD fibers, natural inorganic fibers; and/or synthetic fibers);
    • about 10% to 80% cementitious or other hydraulic binders;
    • about 20% to 80% silica or other aggregates;
    • about 0% to 50% lightweight density modifiers; and
    • about 0% to 10% additives.


The preferred embodiments of the present invention disclose a method of manufacturing a fiber reinforced composite material using low COD fibers. The first step of this method is to prepare a low COD fiber by reducing impurities in cellulose fibers. This is preferably accomplished by treating the fibers in an aqueous solution for a predetermined reaction time, while maintaining the solution temperature greater than about 65° C., and providing agitation to the solution so as to facilitate diffusion of impurities from the pores and lumens of the fibers. The method of manufacturing fiber cement in accordance with the embodiments preferably includes the steps identified above, and the following additional steps:

    • processing (fiberizing, dispersing, defibrillating, etc.) the low COD fiber;
    • mixing the fibers with a cementitious binder and other ingredients to form a fiber cement mixture;
    • forming the fiber cement mixture into a fiber cement article of a pre-selected shape and size; and
    • curing the fiber cement article so as to form the fiber reinforced composite building material.


In another aspect of the present invention, a pulping process is provided. This process comprises providing a delignified fiber substance and converting the fiber substance into fiber pulps. The pulps are washed at elevated temperatures greater than about 65° C. in a manner so as to remove a large portion of COD components from the pulps. The pulps are processed in additional washing cycles to remove substantially all remaining COD impurities.


The advantages of using the low COD fibers in the manufacture of fiber reinforced cement composite materials in accordance with the preferred formulations and processes include but are not limited to:

    • improvements in mechanical and physical properties such as modulus of rupture (MOR), modulus of elasticity (MOE), ultimate strain and toughness energy;
    • less process water contamination due to the impurities dissolved from the cellulose pulps and less fresh water required;
    • less fibers are required to achieve the same reinforcement efficiencies.


These and other objectives and advantages will become apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a preferred process of manufacturing fiber cement grade cellulose pulps in which the COD content in cellulose pulps is substantially reduced;



FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a preferred process of manufacturing fiber reinforced cement composite materials incorporating the low COD and high purity fibers;



FIG. 3 illustrate the relationship between COD content in the pulps and the strength of the final fiber cement products and level of contamination in the process water during the manufacture of the fiber cement materials.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The preferred embodiments describe the preparation and application of low impurity fibers in cementitious fiber reinforced composite materials. These embodiments encompass not only the method of removing COD components from fibers, but also the formulation and the methods of manufacture of fiber reinforced composite materials formed from low COD and high purity fibers, as well as the properties of the final products. The treatment to remove impurities from pulps can also be implemented in conjunction with other fiber treatments. Further details on related chemical treatments of fibers are found in U.S. Pat. No. 6,676,744, U.S. Pat. No. 6,676,745, U.S. Pat. No. 6,777,103, U.S. Pat. No. 6,872,246, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,815,841, including continuations of these patents, the entirety of each being hereby incorporated by reference. It will be appreciated that the embodiments are not applicable solely to cellulose fiber reinforced cementitious products, and accordingly, the techniques described herein may be applied to building materials reinforced with other fibers in non-cement products as well.



FIG. 1 illustrates a preferred process 100 for manufacturing fiber-cement grades of low impurity and high performance cellulose pulps. The process 100 begins with step 102 in which fibrous materials such as wood chips are loaded into a digester/reactor for delignification. After the wood chips are loaded into the digester(s), a selected amount of one or more chemicals are introduced to the digester(s) in step 104 to facilitate the delignification reactions. Dependent on the pulping processes, the chemicals may include sodium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide with sodium sulfate, sodium hydroxide with sodium sulfate plus additive AQ, sodium hydroxide plus additive AQ, and sulfur dioxide. Preferably, the delignification reaction occurs in the digester(s) under high temperature conditions between about 150° C. to 250° C. for about 30 minutes to 5 hours. In some embodiments, process conditions such as alkali usage, cooking temperature or target Kappa numbers, etc. in the digester may be adjusted to accommodate the subsequent washing steps.


As shown in FIG. 1, subsequent to the delignification reaction, the processed wood chips are discharged from the digester to a tank in step 106, utilizing the high-pressure differentiation inside and outside of the digester. With help of chip expansion due to the pressure drop, the processed chips are separated into individual fibers known as pulp during the discharge. The pulp formed at this stage is typically brown in color and thus commonly known as brown stock.


As FIG. 1 further illustrates the pulp subsequently undergoes a series of washing steps in step 108. Preferably, the pulp is washed in counter-current by a series of vacuum, rotary or pressurized brown stock washers at an elevated temperature to remove a large portion of the residual chemicals and degraded wood components contained in the pulp. Unlike conventional pulp washing cycles that are typically carried out without applying any heat, the preferred washing process is carried out at elevated temperatures, preferably greater than about 65° C., more preferably between about 65° C. and 120° C., which can be conveniently implemented using existing equipment and does not cause any substantial damage to the fibers. Some chemicals may also be added in this step to facilitate the washing and increase the washing efficiency. The chemicals that can be used include oxygen, ozone, and hydrogen peroxide, etc. A majority of the impurities residing outsides of fibers can be removed by this step.


Following the washing step 108, the process 100 further includes an additional diffusion washing process in step 110 in which the pulp is subject to further intensive washing to remove substantially all of the remaining impurities, such as COD components, that have not been removed by the brown stock washers. Preferably, the pulp is subject to an intensive counter-current washing scheme at normal or elevated temperatures with mild mechanical agitations. The extensive washing can be carried out by using a variety of different washing systems such as washers, storage tanks, reactors, mixers, agitators, pumps, centrifuges, filter presses or any combinations of these systems. In a preferred embodiment, the washing is performed using the existing equipment in the bleaching plants of most fiber cement pulp mills. In particular, the equipment used may include, but is not limited to, the following:

    • bleaching reactors;
    • bleached stock washers;
    • pulp screw feeders;
    • stock mixers/agitators;
    • bleached stock storage towers;
    • bleached stock deckers; and
    • medium and low consistency pumps.


Preferably, heated fresh water is introduced to the washer system counter-currently to minimize water usage and maximize washing efficiency. Furthermore, the COD containing spent water from the washers is preferably transported to a water treatment plant or chemical recovery system.


In one embodiment, step 110 comprises soaking the pulp in a series of continuous plug flow or semi-continuous bleaching reactors for a prolonged duration at an elevated temperature between about 65° C. to 120° C. for a retention time of between about 30 minutes to 2 hours in each of the reactors followed by a dewatering process after each reactor. Preferably, each reactor is followed by a washing system to remove the COD containing water. The cumulative retention time of the pulp in all reactors preferably does not exceed about 36 hours, more preferably between about 2 to 30 hours. This allows substantially all CODs and other impurities to diffuse out of the fibers without compromising the fiber strength. Furthermore, the pulp in the reactors is preferably maintained at a pulp consistency of about 1% to 30%. Advantageously, the high temperature washing coupled with the prolonged retention time allows the remaining CODs and other impurities to diffuse out from inside of the fiber cell walls and lumens. Furthermore, mechanical agitation provided by the bleaching reactors also facilitates the removal of the COD components and other impurities from the pulp.


In another embodiment, step 110 comprises processing the pulp through a bleached stock washer followed by one or more bleaching reactors. The bleached stock washer may be vacuum, pressure, rotary or diffusion types and is utilized to further separate COD compounds from the fiber. The bleached stock reactor may include those used for oxygen delignification, chlorination, alkaline extraction, chloride dioxide bleaching, hyperchlorite bleaching, ozone bleaching, hydrogen peroxide bleaching, sodium peroxide bleaching and the like. To increase the efficiency of COD removal, the pulp is preferably processed through multiple pairs of bleaching reactors and bleached stock washers in series and/or in parallel.


In yet another embodiment, chemicals are introduced into the pulp slurry during the extensive washing process of step 110 to facilitate the removal of the COD impurities during washing. Preferably, the chemical(s) selectively react with the COD components and break the components down into smaller fragments. The chemicals may comprise oxygen, ozone, hydrogen peroxide, or any others that are capable of reacting with COD compounds and causing the compounds to become more soluble in aqueous solutions. Advantageously, the addition of these chemicals in the extensive washing process of step 110 significantly increases the efficiency of COD removal. Furthermore, the extensive washing process of step 110 can be applied to a variety of different pulping processes including, but not limited to:

    • Kraft;
    • Kraft-AQ;
    • Soda;
    • Soda-AQ;
    • Kraft-Oxygen;
    • Oxygen Delignification;
    • Organic Solvent Pulping;
    • Sulfite Pulping;
    • Steam Explosion Pulping; and
    • Other pulping techniques.


Following the extensive washing process of step 110, the pulp is transported to pulp machines to form pulp laps or rolls in step 112 for making fiber reinforced cement composite materials.


Table 1 illustrates a comparison between the fiber properties of pulp processed by the pulp manufacturing process of the preferred embodiments and those processed by conventional regular temperature washing techniques. In this particular example, the wood species was predominantly Douglas fir (>90%) and the pulping process used was Kraft. For pulp samples made in accordance with the preferred process, six bleaching reactors including oxygen delignification and peroxide bleaching reactors and the corresponding washer systems in series were used to process the pulp following the brown stock washing. No chemicals were introduced during the extensive washing process. The total retention time in the extensive washing process was about 12 hours and the washing temperature was between about 90° C. to 98° C. For pulp samples made in accordance with the conventional washing techniques, the same washing cycle was used with the same retention time of 12 hours. However, the washing temperature was between about 55° C. to 60° C.









TABLE 1







Key Properties of Fibers Made from Normal and Preferred Processes















Fiber



COD
Sodium
Mean Fiber
Strength


Washing
Content
Content
Length
(ZST Wet)


Scheme
(kg/ton pulp)
(kg/ton pulp)
(mm)
(km)














Conventional
5
0.49
2.73
11.76


Process Temp.


(55-60° C.)


Elevated
2.8
0.21
2.71
11.81


Temperature


(90-98° C.)









As shown in Table 1, the extensive washing at an elevated temperature reduces the COD content and sodium content of the pulp by about 50%. The COD and sodium contents are general indications of pulp cleanliness or extensiveness of washing. The COD content was measured by first dispersing the fiber into 0.01N NaOH solution, blending the solution for about 10 minutes at about 3200 rpm, then filtering the pulp with Watman #3 qualitative filter paper to obtain the filtrate, and measuring the COD content of the filtrate in accordance with Hach Method 8000 (dichromate reactor digestion and calorimetric measurement). The sodium content was measured in accordance with TAPPI method T 266 om-88 (TAPPI: Technical Association of Pulp & Paper Industry, USA).


Furthermore, as Table 1 shows, the extensive washing process of the preferred embodiment did not compromise critical fiber properties such as fiber length and fiber strength as the values for these two properties remain substantially the same for samples processed through the extensive washing process at the elevated temperature and those processed through the conventional washing cycles. The weighted average fiber length was measured by FS-200 (a fiber analyzer manufactured by Valmet). The zero span tensile (ZST) fiber strength was tested in accordance with TAPPI method T231 cm-85.Advantageously, the pulping process of the preferred embodiments can be applied to the manufacture of fiber cement grade pulps and can reduce the COD content of the fiber pulps by about 50% or more without adversely affecting key fiber physical and mechanical properties. It will be appreciated that pulp COD content can be reduced by about 20% or more under appropriate conditions. Furthermore, the pulp manufacturing process can be implemented in a cost-effective manner using existing equipment and processes in most fiber cement processing mills.


One preferred formulation of the fiber reinforced composite material comprises a cementitious binder, an aggregate, low COD and high purity cellulose fibers, density modifiers, and various additives to improve different material properties. It will be appreciated that not all of these components are necessary to formulate a suitable building product, and thus, in certain embodiments, the formulation may simply comprise cementitious binder and low COD cellulose fibers. Most of the embodiments described herein can be encompassed by the following formulation:

    • about 10%-80% cementitious binder;
    • about 20%-80% silica (aggregates);
    • about 0%-80% density modifiers;
    • about 0%-10% additives; and
    • about 0.5%-20% low COD and high purity cellulose fibers or a combination of low COD cellulose fibers and/or natural inorganic fibers, and/or synthetic fibers; and/or regular cellulose fibers.


A low COD fiber preferably refers to a fiber having a COD content less than about 5 kg/ton, more preferably less than about 3.5 kg/ton of pulp.


The cementitious binder is preferably Portland cement but can also be, but is not limited to, high alumina cement, lime, high phosphate cement, and ground granulated blast furnace slag cement, or mixtures thereof.


The aggregate is preferably ground silica sand but can also be, but is not limited to, amorphous silica, micro silica, geothermal silica, diatomaceous earth, coal combustion fly and bottom ashes, rice hull ash, blast furnace slag, granulated slag, steel slag, mineral oxides, mineral hydroxides, clays, magnasite or dolomite, metal oxides and hydroxides, and polymeric beads, or mixtures thereof.


The density modifiers can be organic and/or inorganic lightweight materials with a density of less than about 1.5 g/cm3. The density modifiers may include plastic materials, expanded polystyrene, other foamed polymer materials, glass and ceramic materials, calcium silicate hydrates, microspheres and volcanic ashes including perlite, pumice, shirasu, zeolites in expanded forms. The density modifiers can be natural or synthetic materials.


The additives can include, but are not limited to, viscosity modifiers, fire retardant, waterproofing agents, silica fume, geothermal silica, thickeners, pigments, colorants, plasticizers, dispersants, forming agents, flocculent, drainage aids, wet and dry strength aids, silicone materials, aluminum powder, clay, kaolin, alumina trihydrate, mica, metakaolin, calcium carbonate, wollastonite, and polymeric resin emulsion, or mixtures thereof.


The low COD and high purity cellulose fibers are preferably individualized fibers, and are unrefined/unfibrillated or refined/fibrillated cellulose pulps from sources, including but not limited to bleached, unbleached, semi-bleached cellulose pulp produced by pulping processes such as Kraft, Kraft-AQ, oxygen delignification, organic solvent pulping, sulfite pulping, steam explosion pulping or any other pulping techniques. The cellulose pulps can be made of softwood, hardwood, agricultural raw materials, recycled waste paper or any other forms of lignocellulosic materials.


Preferably, the low COD and high purity fibers have a freeness of 150 to 600 degrees of Canadian Standard Freeness (CSF) in accordance with TAPPI method T 227 om-99. The cement and silica preferably have surface areas of about 250 to 400 m2/kg and about 300 to 450 m2/kg, respectively. The surface area for both the cement and silica is tested in accordance with ASTM C204-96a.


Test Results—Mechanical & Physical Properties


Applications of low COD and high purity fibers in fiber reinforced composite materials desirably improve the mechanical and physical properties of the final building product. Fiber cement products using low COD and high purity cellulose fibers have improved physical and mechanical properties.









TABLE 2







Key Mechanical Properties of Fiber Cement Composite Materials


Using Low COD Cellulose Fiber and High COD Cellulose Fiber














COD








Content in
COD
Modulus
Modulus


Specimen
Oven Dried
Content in
of
of


Of Fiber
Pulp
4% Pulp
Rupture
Elasticity
Ultimate


Cement
(kg/ton of
Slurry
(MOR)
(MOE)
Strain
Toughness


Composite
pulp)
(mg/L)
(MPa)
(GPa)
(um/m)
(J/m3)
















A
5
63
6.16
2.29
6003
4.58


B
2.8
37
8.89
3.36
9304
6.43









Table 2 above provides an illustrative comparison of various mechanical and physical properties of fiber cement products made with formulations that incorporate low COD fibers made in accordance with preferred embodiments and those that use conventional cellulose fibers. Prototype samples of fiber cement materials are produced based on two equivalent formulations (A and B). An equivalent formulation is herein defined as one in which the preferred low COD fibers are displaced by an equivalent percentage of conventional cellulose fibers. Formulations A and B each comprises about 35% Portland cement, about 55% silica and about 10% fibers. Formulation A contains high COD fibers while Formulation B incorporates low COD fibers. Other key properties for the fibers were the same for both formulations: fiber length, about 2.58 mm; Kappa number, about 26; and freeness, about 472 CSF. The Kappa and freeness were measured in accordance with TAPPI method T236 and T 227 om-99, respectively. Both fibers were made from the wood species predominately Douglas fir (>90%) by Kraft process. The fibers were first refined to the pre-determined freeness at 4% consistency, mixed with other ingredients and formed into articles. The articles were then pre-cured at ambient temperature for 12 hours and then autoclaved for 12 hours at 180° C. All mechanical properties were tested under the wet condition in accordance with ASTM (American Standard Test Method) C1185-98a entitled “Standard Test Methods of Sampling and Testing Non-Asbestos Fiber-Cement Flat Sheet, Roofing and Siding Shingles, and Clapboards.”


Table 2 shows that incorporation of low COD fibers in the fiber cement matrix can significantly improve the key physical and mechanical properties of the fiber cement composite materials as compared to samples made with an equivalent formulation that does not contain low COD fibers. For example, the low COD fibers improve the modulus of rupture (MOR) by about 44%, modulus of elasticity (MOE) by about 46%, ultimate strain by about 54%, and toughness by about 40%.


It will be appreciated that by varying the washing and/or other process conditions, and accordingly by lowering the COD content in the fibers, the improvement in these and other properties can be selectively controlled. Thus, in one embodiment, the low COD fibers can improve the MOR by about 10% or more, more preferably by about 20% or more, as compared to an equivalent formulation made with high COD (i.e., equal or higher than 5 kg/ton of pulp). Similarly, the low COD fibers can improve the MOE by about 10% or more, more preferably by about 20% or more. The low COD fibers can also improve the ultimate strain by about 10% or more, more preferably by about 20% or more. The low COD fibers can also improve the toughness of the composite building material by about 10% or more, more preferably by about 20% or more.


Due to the high reinforcement efficiency of low COD fibers, a smaller amount of the low COD and high purity fiber may be required to achieve the same reinforcement efficiency, compared to the regular fibers. It can be appreciated that the advantages of incorporating the low COD and high purity fibers in the fiber cement composite materials may not be limited to the above formulations and properties.


A preferred method of manufacturing a fiber reinforced composite building material incorporating the low COD fibers described herein above generally comprises the following steps:

    • preparing cellulose fibers containing low COD components and other impurities;
    • dispersing the low COD and high purity fibers at a pre-selected consistency;
    • fibrillating the low COD and high purity fibers to a pre-selected freeness range;
    • mixing the low COD and high purity fibers with ingredients to form a fiber cement mixture in accordance with the preferred formulations;
    • fabricating/forming the fiber cement mixture into a fiber cement article of a pre-selected shape and size; and
    • curing the fiber cement article so as to form the fiber reinforced composite building material.


Preferably, the step of mixing the low COD and high purity fibers with other ingredients to form a fiber cement mixture comprises mixing the low COD and high purity fibers with non-cellulose materials such as a hydraulic binder, aggregate, density modifiers, and additives in accordance with the preferred formulations of this invention. In some embodiments, the low COD and high purity fibers can also be mixed with regular cellulose pulp with high COD contents, natural inorganic fibers and synthetic fibers.



FIG. 2 illustrates a preferred process 200 of manufacturing a fiber reinforced cementitious composite material incorporating low COD and high purity cellulose fibers. As FIG. 2 shows, the process begins with step 202 in which substantially all impurities in cellulose fibers have been removed in accordance with the methods described herein above. The low COD and high purity fibers are subsequently processed in step 204. The fiber processing step 204 typically involves fiber dispersion and fibrillation. In one embodiment, the fibers are dispersed at a consistency of about 1% to 6% in a hydra-pulper, which also imparts some fibrillation. Further fibrillation can be achieved using a refiner or series of refiners. Once dispersed, the fibers are then fibrillated to a range of about 100 to 750 degrees of CSF (Canadian Standard Freeness), more preferably between about 180 to 600 degrees of CSF. Dispersion and fibrillation can also be achieved by other techniques such as hammer-milling, deflakering, shredding, and the like. Furthermore, use of fibers without fibrillation is also acceptable for some products and processes. Most of residual COD impurities in the fiber will be released into the process water at this step.


As FIG. 2 shows, in step 206, the processed low COD cellulose pulps are proportionally mixed with the other ingredients to form a waterborne mixture, slurry, or paste. In one embodiment, the low COD and high purity cellulose fibers are mixed with cement, silica, a density modifier and other additives in a well-known mixing process to form a slurry or paste. In the mixer natural inorganic and synthetic fibers can be blended with the low COD fibers. The process 200 follows with step 208 in which the mixture may be formed into a “green” or uncured shaped article using a number of conventional manufacturing as would be known to one of skillful in the art, such as:

    • Hatschek sheet process;
    • Mazza pipe process;
    • Magnani process;
    • Injection molding;
    • Extrusion;
    • Hand lay-up;
    • Molding;
    • Casting;
    • Filter pressing;
    • Fourdrinier forming;
    • Multi-wire forming;
    • Gap blade forming;
    • Gap roll/blade forming;
    • Bel-Roll forming; and
    • Others.


These processes may also include a pressing or embossing operation after the article is formed. More preferable, no pressing is used. The processing steps and parameters used to achieve the final product using a Hatschek process are similar to what is described in Australian Patent No. 515151.


Following step 208, the “green” or uncured shaped article is cured in step 210. The article is preferably pre-cured for up to 80 hours, most preferably 24 hours or less. The article is then air-cured for approximately 30 days. More preferably, the pre-cured articles is autoclaved at an elevated temperature and pressure in a steam saturated environment at about 60 to 200° C. for about 3 to 30 hours, more preferably about 24 hours or less. The time and temperature chosen for the pre-cure and cure processes are dependent on the formulation, the manufacturing process, the process parameters, and the final form of the product.



FIG. 3 shows the effects of COD contents in the pulp on the amount of contaminants released to the process water and the modulus of rupture (MOR) of the fiber reinforced cement composite material. As illustrated in FIG. 3, low COD fibers were added at the 0 day mark, and over a 30 day trial, the average COD in the process water and the MOR remained fairly constant. At 30 days, regular fibers were added to the mixture, resulting in increased contamination of the process water or a large amount of COD released to the process water, and decreased modulus of rupture (MOR) of the final cement product (measured after curing step 210). In particular, the average COD in the process water is about 50 mg/L when low COD fibers are used, while the average COD in the process water can reach as high as about 115 mg/L within weeks of experimental trial after regular fibers are added. Therefore, the use of low COD fibers reduces the amount of COD in the process water by about 50% compared to the use of regular fibers that are not treated as described above. It will be appreciated, however, that a reduction in COD content in the process water of about 10% or more will be significant for improvement in properties of the fiber cement composite materials, and for reducing the fresh water usage in the manufacture process.


The low COD pulp used in the example shown in FIG. 3 was made by using the extensive washing technique described in above embodiments. The freeness of the pulps was about 400 CSF. The fiber cement material was fabricated by a Hatschek process and autoclave curing technique. The fiber cement material made with the high COD pulp is based on an equivalent formulation, in which the low COD pulp is displaced by an equal amount of regular fiber pulp. The formulation of the fiber cement composite materials in this example contained:

    • about 8% fiber pulp;
    • about 35% Portland cement; and
    • about 57% ground silica.


The preferred embodiments provide a technique for removing COD components/impurities from cellulose pulps in the manufacture of fiber cement grade pulps. Specifically, the preferred embodiments disclose the implementation of an additional extensive washing process in the pulp processing cycle, preferably after the digester, and during or after the brown stock washer system. One embodiment of this invention utilizes the existing equipment available in bleaching plants at most fiber cement pulp mills to carry out an extensive counter-current pulp washing at a normal or elevated temperature. Preferably, the multiple bleaching towers, which are typically a series of continuous plug flow reactors, are utilized to soak the pulps and diffuse COD and other impurities out from cellulose cell walls to the bulk solution. The washers in the bleaching plants subsequently remove the COD and other impurities by dewatering the pulp and transferring the unwanted components to the wastewater. Advantageously, the technique of the preferred embodiments is capable of generating pulps with low COD contents and high purity while maintaining fiber strength, fiber lengths, and other key fiber properties that are important to manufactures of fiber reinforced cement composite materials. Furthermore, the technique is simple to implement and requires no addition of chemicals in some embodiments. The technique can reduce COD content of the pulp by about 20% to 80%. Incorporation of the low COD fibers in the fiber cement composite material in accordance with the formulations and manufacture method of the present invention improves various physical and mechanical properties of the final product, and reduces the fresh water usage in the manufacturing process.


Although the foregoing description of the preferred embodiment of the present invention has shown, described and pointed out the fundamental novel features of the invention, it will be understood that various omissions, substitutions, and changes in the form of the detail of the apparatus as illustrated as well as the uses thereof, may be made by those skilled in the art, without departing from the spirit of the invention. Consequently, the scope of the invention should not be limited to the foregoing discussions, but should be defined by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of making a fiber cement composite building material incorporating cellulose fibers, the method comprising: washing the cellulose fibers at an elevated temperature washing process between about 65 degrees Centigrade to about 120 degrees Centigrade to reduce COD content of the cellulose fibers to less than 4.5 kg/ton, wherein the COD content of the cellulose fibers alone is measurable from a filtrate after a portion of the cellulose fibers alone are dispersed in a solution in the absence of cement and measured prior to being combined to form the fiber cement composite building material; andincorporating the reduced COD cellulose fibers into a cementitious mixture for making the fiber cement composite building material,wherein the reduced COD cellulose fibers comprise about 2% to 20% by weight of the fiber cement composite building material, and wherein the reduced COD cellulose fibers increase strength reinforcement to the fiber cement composite building material when formed by increasing the modulus of rupture (MOR) of the fiber cement composite building material by more than about 10% as-compared with a fiber cement composite building material made with a same formulation containing cellulose fibers with COD content greater than 5 kg/ton of oven dried pulp measurable from a filtrate.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the cellulose fibers are cellulose fibers made from delignified cellulose pulps of lignocellulosic materials by a pulping process.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the fiber cement composite building material further comprises an aggregate.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the aggregate is ground silica.
  • 5. The method of claim 3, wherein the aggregate is selected from the group consisting of ground silica, amorphous silica, micro silica, diatomaceous earth, coal combustion fly and bottom ashes, rice hull ash, blast furnace slag, granulated slag, steel slag, mineral oxides, mineral hydroxides, clays, magnasite or dolomite, metal oxides and hydroxides, and polymeric beads, and mixtures thereof.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the fiber cement composite building material further comprises one or more density modifiers.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the density modifier is selected from the group consisting of plastic materials, expanded polystyrene, glass and ceramic materials, calcium silicate hydrates, microspheres and volcano ashes including perlite, pumice, shirasu basalt, and zeolites in expanded forms, and mixtures thereof.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the fiber cement composite building material further comprises one or more additives.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the fiber cement composite building material comprises a cementitious binder selected from the group consisting of Portland cement, high alumina cement, lime, high phosphate cement, and ground granulated blast furnace slag cement, and mixtures thereof.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising incorporating additional fibers selected from the group consisting of natural inorganic fibers, synthetic polymer fibers, regular cellulose fibers and mixtures thereof.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, further comprising fibrillating the cellulose fibers with reduced COD to a freeness of about 150 to 750 degrees of Canadian Standard Freeness.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, further comprising including about 10%-80% cement by weight in the cementitious mixture.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, further comprising including about 20%-80% silica by weight in the cementitious mixture.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, further comprising including about 0%-50% lightweight density modifiers by weight in the cementitious mixture.
  • 15. The method of claim 1, further comprising including about 0%-10% additives by weight in the cementitious mixture.
  • 16. The method of claim 1, wherein the cellulose fibers with reduced COD improve the modulus of rupture of the fiber cement composite building material by more than about 20%, compared to a fiber cement composite building material made with an equivalent formulation containing cellulose fibers with COD content greater than 5 kg/ton of oven dried pulp measurable from a filtrate.
  • 17. The method of claim 1, wherein the cellulose fibers with reduced COD improve modulus of elasticity (MOE) of the fiber cement composite building material by more than about 10%, compared to a fiber cement composite building material made with an equivalent formulation containing cellulose fibers with COD content greater than 5 kg/ton of oven dried pulp measurable from a filtrate.
  • 18. The method of claim 1, wherein the cellulose fibers with reduced COD improve ultimate strain of the fiber cement composite building material by more than about 20%, compared to a fiber cement composite building material made with an equivalent formulation containing cellulose fibers with COD content greater than 5 kg/ton of oven dried pulp measurable from a filtrate.
  • 19. The method of claim 1, wherein the cellulose fibers with reduced COD reduce amount of COD released to process water by more than about 10% in the manufacture of the fiber cement composite building material, compared to a fiber cement composite building material made with an equivalent formulation containing cellulose fibers with COD content greater than 5 kg/ton of oven dried pulp measurable from a filtrate.
  • 20. The method of claim 1, wherein the cellulose fibers with reduced COD improve toughness of the fiber cement composite building material by more than about 10%, compared to a fiber cement composite building material made with an equivalent formulation containing a cellulose fibers with COD content greater than 5 kg/ton of oven dried pulp measurable from a filtrate.
  • 21. A method of making a fiber reinforced composite building material comprising: preparing delignified cellulose fibers to have a COD content of less than about 4.5 kg/ton of oven dried pulp by pretreating through an elevated temperature washing process that includes chemicals which react with COD compounds causing the COD compounds to be more soluble and to reduce COD content of the cellulose fibers to less than 4.5 kg/ton using an elevated temperature between about 65 degrees Centigrade to about 120 degrees Centigrade, wherein COD content is measurable from a filtrate obtained from prepared cellulose fibers alone in a solution in the absence of cement and prior to forming the fiber reinforced composite building material;incorporating the prepared and delignified cellulose fibers with a cementitious mixture;forming the fiber cement mixture into a fiber cement article using a process selected from the group consisting of Hatschek, Mazza pipe, Magnani, injection molding, extrusion, hand lay-up, multi-wire forming, gap blade forming and bel-roll forming, the fiber cement article of a pre-selected shape and size; andcuring the fiber cement article so as to form the fiber reinforced composite building material, wherein preparing the delignified cellulose fibers increases strength reinforcement to the fiber reinforced composite building material when formed by increasing the ultimate strain by more than about 10% as-compared with a fiber reinforced composite building material made with a same formulation containing cellulose fibers with COD content greater than 5 kg/ton of oven dried pulp measurable from a filtrate.
  • 22. The method of claim 21, further comprising adding additional fibers into the formulation wherein the additional fibers are selected from the group consisting of natural inorganic fibers, synthetic polymer fibers, regular cellulose fibers and mixtures thereof.
  • 23. The method of claim 21, wherein the fiber cement mixture includes one or more additives.
  • 24. The method of claim 21, wherein the COD content of the cellulose fibers is measurable from a filtrate prior to being combined in the formulation.
  • 25. The method of claim 21, wherein the reduced COD fibers are fibrillated to a freeness of about 150 to 750 degrees of Canadian Standard Freeness before being combined in the formulation.
  • 26. The method of claim 21, wherein the cellulose fibers are from a softwood.
  • 27. A fiber cement composite building material comprising a cementitious matrix andpretreated and delignified cellulose fibers with a reduced COD content,wherein the delignified cellulose fibers are pretreated before incorporating into the cementitious matrix using an elevated temperature washing process to reduce COD content of the delignified cellulose fibers to less than 4.5 kg/ton of oven dried pulp and the elevated temperature is between about 65 degrees Centigrade to about 120 degrees Centigrade,wherein COD content of the pretreated and delignified cellulose fibers is measurable from a filtrate prior to being incorporated into the cementitious matrix, and the filtrate is obtainable from dispensing the pretreated and delignified cellulose fibers into a solution without cement, andwherein the cellulose fibers with reduced COD improve one or more of the modulus of rupture (MOR) of the fiber cement composite building material by more than about 10% or the ultimate strain of the fiber cement composite building material by more than about 10% as compared with a fiber cement composite building material made with a same formulation containing cellulose fibers with a COD content greater than 5 kg/ton of oven dried pulp measurable from a filtrate.
  • 28. The fiber cement composite building material of claim 27, wherein the cellulose fibers are from a softwood.
  • 29. The fiber cement composite building material of claim 27, wherein the cementitious matrix includes one or more density modifiers.
  • 30. The fiber cement composite building material of claim 27, wherein the cementitious matrix includes one or more additives.
  • 31. The fiber cement composite building material of claim 27, wherein COD content of the cellulose fibers is less than about 3.5 kg/ton.
  • 32. The fiber cement composite building material of claim 27, wherein the delignified cellulose fibers are up to about 8% by weight.
  • 33. The fiber cement composite building material of claim 27, wherein the cementitious matrix includes Portland cement up to about 35 wt. %.
  • 34. The fiber cement composite building material of claim 27, wherein the cementitious matrix includes a silica aggregate of up to about 57 wt. %.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/241,102, filed on Oct. 17, 2000, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (160)
Number Name Date Kind
1571048 Garrow Jan 1926 A
1914163 Randall Jun 1933 A
2024689 Walter et al. Dec 1935 A
2030383 Luth et al. Feb 1936 A
2054854 Dreyfus Sep 1936 A
2156308 Schuh May 1939 A
2156311 Schuh May 1939 A
2175568 Haustein Oct 1939 A
2175569 Kennedy Oct 1939 A
2176668 Egeberg et al. Oct 1939 A
2377484 Elmendorf Jun 1945 A
2645576 Bate et al. Jul 1953 A
2880101 Ulfstedt Mar 1959 A
3264125 Bourlin Aug 1966 A
3716386 Kempster Feb 1973 A
3748100 Forseth Jul 1973 A
3748160 Carbajal Jul 1973 A
3753749 Nutt Aug 1973 A
3836412 Boustany et al. Sep 1974 A
3843380 Beyn Oct 1974 A
3865779 Oya et al. Feb 1975 A
3918981 Long Nov 1975 A
3931069 Lundin Jan 1976 A
3969567 Occleshaw et al. Jul 1976 A
3998944 Long Dec 1976 A
4003752 Isohata et al. Jan 1977 A
4013480 Chumbley et al. Mar 1977 A
4088804 Cornwell et al. May 1978 A
4098701 Burrill et al. Jul 1978 A
4102697 Fukuba et al. Jul 1978 A
4138313 Hillstrom et al. Feb 1979 A
4177176 Burrill et al. Dec 1979 A
4225383 McReynolds Sep 1980 A
4258090 Moraru Mar 1981 A
4274913 Kikuiri et al. Jun 1981 A
4306911 Gordon et al. Dec 1981 A
4351867 Mulvey et al. Sep 1982 A
4406703 Guthrie et al. Sep 1983 A
4428775 Johnson et al. Jan 1984 A
4457785 Hsu et al. Jul 1984 A
4486234 Herr Dec 1984 A
4497688 Schaefer Feb 1985 A
4510020 Green et al. Apr 1985 A
4517375 Schmidt et al. May 1985 A
4548676 Johnstone et al. Oct 1985 A
4637860 Harper et al. Jan 1987 A
4643920 McEntee et al. Feb 1987 A
4647505 Blackie et al. Mar 1987 A
4647509 Wallace et al. Mar 1987 A
4647589 Valone Mar 1987 A
4655979 Nakano et al. Apr 1987 A
4659386 Nagai et al. Apr 1987 A
4738723 Frizzell et al. Apr 1988 A
4766113 West et al. Aug 1988 A
4806203 Elton Feb 1989 A
4938958 Niira et al. Jul 1990 A
4944842 Stromberg et al. Jul 1990 A
4971658 Henricson et al. Nov 1990 A
4985119 Vinson et al. Jan 1991 A
5021093 Beshay Jun 1991 A
5030289 Sattler et al. Jul 1991 A
5047086 Hayakawa et al. Sep 1991 A
5049196 Ries Sep 1991 A
5063260 Chen et al. Nov 1991 A
5102596 Lempfer et al. Apr 1992 A
5118225 Koch et al. Jun 1992 A
5191456 Sutherland et al. Mar 1993 A
5223090 Klungness et al. Jun 1993 A
5236994 Markusch et al. Aug 1993 A
5346541 Goldman et al. Sep 1994 A
5403392 Craig Apr 1995 A
5405498 Pease Apr 1995 A
5415734 Backlund et al. May 1995 A
5421867 Yeager et al. Jun 1995 A
5429717 Bokstrom et al. Jul 1995 A
5432215 Girg et al. Jul 1995 A
5465547 Jakel Nov 1995 A
5472486 Dragner et al. Dec 1995 A
5482550 Strait Jan 1996 A
5520779 Bold May 1996 A
5577024 Malkamaki et al. Nov 1996 A
RE35460 Klungness et al. Feb 1997 E
5643359 Soroushian et al. Jul 1997 A
5705542 Roffael et al. Jan 1998 A
5777024 Killilea et al. Jul 1998 A
5786282 Carter et al. Jul 1998 A
5795515 Fischer Aug 1998 A
5804003 Nishizawa Sep 1998 A
5866057 Roffael et al. Feb 1999 A
5871824 Bates Feb 1999 A
5876561 Tsai Mar 1999 A
5897701 Soroushian et al. Apr 1999 A
5945044 Kawai et al. Aug 1999 A
5989335 Soroushian et al. Nov 1999 A
6030447 Naji et al. Feb 2000 A
6045057 Moor et al. Apr 2000 A
6086998 Wihsmann Jul 2000 A
6138430 Van Acoleyen et al. Oct 2000 A
6176920 Murphy et al. Jan 2001 B1
6228215 Hoffman, Jr. May 2001 B1
6245196 Martin et al. Jun 2001 B1
6325853 Hogan et al. Dec 2001 B1
6344654 Lesko Feb 2002 B1
6346146 Duselis et al. Feb 2002 B1
6346165 Markessini et al. Feb 2002 B1
6352952 Jardine et al. Mar 2002 B1
6419788 Wingerson Jul 2002 B1
6475275 Nebesnak et al. Nov 2002 B1
6488762 Shi Dec 2002 B1
6506248 Duselis et al. Jan 2003 B1
6512132 Isoda et al. Jan 2003 B2
6528151 Shah et al. Mar 2003 B1
6562743 Cook et al. May 2003 B1
6572697 Gleeson et al. Jun 2003 B2
6613424 Putt et al. Sep 2003 B1
6676744 Merkley et al. Jan 2004 B2
6676745 Merkley et al. Jan 2004 B2
6719878 Svedman Apr 2004 B1
6749897 Naji et al. Jun 2004 B2
6770576 Cook et al. Aug 2004 B2
6777103 Merkley et al. Aug 2004 B2
6837452 Dezutter et al. Jan 2005 B2
6872246 Merkley et al. Mar 2005 B2
6893751 Naji et al. May 2005 B2
6933038 Nanko et al. Aug 2005 B2
6942726 Cook et al. Sep 2005 B2
7028436 Bezubic, Jr. Apr 2006 B2
7081184 Wester et al. Jul 2006 B2
7226525 Vrbanac et al. Jun 2007 B2
7300546 Jewell et al. Nov 2007 B2
7344593 Luo et al. Mar 2008 B2
7455727 Trevethick Nov 2008 B2
20020007926 Jewell et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020007927 Vahatalo et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020051892 Laks et al. May 2002 A1
20020059886 Merkley et al. May 2002 A1
20020069791 Merkley et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020088584 Merkley et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020121229 Jardine et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020170466 Naji et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020170467 Naji et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020170468 Luo et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020175126 Naji et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020179219 Naji et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020189499 Naji et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020189500 Naji et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020192510 Naji et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030000424 Naji et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030164119 Naji et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040043217 Dezutter et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040043686 Batdorf Mar 2004 A1
20040132843 Baumgart et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040145078 Merkley et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040168615 Luo et al. Sep 2004 A1
20050016423 Merkley et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050045067 Naji et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050126430 Lightner, Jr. et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050208287 Naji et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050235883 Merkley et al. Oct 2005 A1
20070077436 Naji et al. Apr 2007 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (110)
Number Date Country
250022 Oct 1991 AR
015457 Sep 1998 AR
014046 Nov 1998 AR
014702 Mar 1999 AR
391131 Aug 1990 AT
515151 Mar 1981 AU
2002240552 Sep 2002 AU
1177205 Nov 1984 CA
2242749 Feb 1999 CA
2405354 Nov 2001 CA
32972 Feb 1980 CL
2346-01 Sep 2001 CL
2347-01 Sep 2001 CL
2352-01 Sep 2001 CL
2353-01 Sep 2001 CL
461-02 Mar 2002 CL
1032332 Apr 1989 CN
1199116 Nov 1998 CN
1224701 Aug 1999 CN
3037220 Apr 1982 DE
3308917 Sep 1984 DE
3 601 736 Jul 1987 DE
4 316 666 Dec 1994 DE
19654836 Jun 1998 DE
EU-0049365 Apr 1982 EP
0 058 263 Jul 1982 EP
0287962 Apr 1987 EP
EU-0305209 Mar 1989 EP
0331666 Sep 1989 EP
0263723 Feb 1991 EP
484283 Jun 1992 EP
0147429 Jul 1995 EP
0716182 Jun 1996 EP
EU-1052262 Nov 2000 EP
EU-1088800 Apr 2001 EP
1106236 Jun 2001 EP
EU-1155794 Nov 2001 EP
1346964 Sep 2003 EP
1334076 Aug 2006 EP
2033987 Apr 1993 ES
895184 Jan 1945 FR
1557348 Feb 1969 FR
2 611 432 Sep 1988 FR
22139 Nov 1901 GB
442098 Feb 1936 GB
449384 Jun 1936 GB
731597 Jun 1955 GB
1 003 850 Sep 1965 GB
1536663 Dec 1978 GB
2041384 Sep 1980 GB
1 604 910 Dec 1981 GB
1604910 Dec 1981 GB
2137977 Oct 1984 GB
2 307 425 May 1997 GB
55085756 Jun 1980 JP
59203747 Nov 1984 JP
60-118658 Jun 1985 JP
61019900 Jan 1986 JP
63-107849 May 1988 JP
63107849 May 1988 JP
01141849 Jun 1989 JP
03016978 Jan 1991 JP
04182335 Jun 1992 JP
04342746 Nov 1992 JP
5-177625 Jul 1993 JP
05184246 Jul 1993 JP
06024821 Feb 1994 JP
06144911 May 1994 JP
6-341093 Dec 1994 JP
07041592 Feb 1995 JP
07-109165 Apr 1995 JP
08119708 May 1996 JP
2508554 Jun 1996 JP
08-260371 Oct 1996 JP
09-255385 Sep 1997 JP
10095922 Apr 1998 JP
11-010631 Jan 1999 JP
11099512 Apr 1999 JP
2000-044302 Feb 2000 JP
2001 240458 Sep 2001 JP
2001316163 Nov 2001 JP
2003335560 Nov 2003 JP
1019950008587 Aug 1995 KR
154782 Dec 1991 PL
190627 Dec 2005 PL
9604599-2 Jun 1998 SE
240472 Mar 1969 SU
WO 8404765 Dec 1984 WO
WO 9101409 Feb 1991 WO
WO-9520066 Jul 1995 WO
WO 9617996 Jun 1996 WO
WO 9708111 Mar 1997 WO
WO 9731153 Aug 1997 WO
WO-9818855 May 1998 WO
WO-9827027 Jun 1998 WO
WO-9845222 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9935330 Jul 1999 WO
WO 0071336 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0130927 May 2001 WO
WO-0168547 Sep 2001 WO
WO 0108166 Nov 2001 WO
WO 0181666 Nov 2001 WO
WO 0212623 Feb 2002 WO
WO 0218486 Mar 2002 WO
WO 0228796 Apr 2002 WO
WO 0233164 Apr 2002 WO
WO-0228795 Apr 2002 WO
WO-02070425 Sep 2002 WO
WO-02072499 Sep 2002 WO
WO 2004063113 Jul 2004 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20020112827 A1 Aug 2002 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60241102 Oct 2000 US