Method and apparatus for reducing noise in electronic film development

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6503002
  • Patent Number
    6,503,002
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, January 18, 2000
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 7, 2003
    22 years ago
Abstract
In electronic film development, a film is scanned, using light, multiple times during development. The light is reflected from an emulsion containing milky undeveloped silver halide embedded with developing grains. The undeveloped halide layer has a finite depth over which photons from a light source scatter backward. This depth is within the range of the coherency length of infrared sources commonly used in electronic film development, causing coherency speckle noise in the scanned image. A prescan made after the emulsion swells, but before the silver grains develop, normalizes subsequent scans, pixel by pixel, to cancel coherency speckle and other defects.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention generally relates to the electronic development of film and more particularly to a method and apparatus for reducing noise in electronic film development.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Electronic film development, also known as digital development, is a method of digitizing color film during the development process as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,519,510 issued to the present inventor. Conversion of analog images into digital data, or scanning, has become widespread for a variety of uses, including storing, manipulating, transmitting, displaying or printing copies of the images.




In order to convert a photographic image into a digital image, the film image frame is transported through a film scanning station, and illuminated along each scan line with a linear light beam of uniform, diffuse illumination, typically produced by a light integrating cavity or integrator. The light transmitted through the illuminated scan line of the image frame is focused by a lens system on a CCD-array image detector which typically produces three primary color light intensity signals for each image pixel. These light intensity signals are then digitized and stored. Film scanners which enable the electronic development of film have a variety of forms today and the common aspects of film image frame digitizing, particularly line illumination and linear CCD array based digitizers, are described in greater detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,155,596.




In electronic film development, the developing film is scanned at a certain time interval(s) using infrared light so as not to fog the developing film, and also to increase penetration of the light through any antihalation layers. Some of the incident light is reflected from an emulsion on the film which contains milky, undeveloped silver halide. The undeveloped halide emulsion has a finite depth over which the photons from the light source will scatter and reflect back toward a detector. This depth is within the range of the coherency length of infrared light sources commonly in use in electronic film development today. It is this finite reflective depth which causes noise in the scanned image due to coherency speckle. Noise in the scanned image results in capturing an image distorted by graininess.




Because of the longer wavelength of infrared light, both the wavelength and the dividing fractional bandwidth for a fixed bandwidth contributes to a longer coherency length than normally encountered in visible light. In addition, the width of the milky silver halide layers is very thin in electronic film development, reducing the coherency length necessary to produce interference speckle.




Furthermore, the image seen through the back side of the film is very faint, so any coherency speckle is amplified as the faint image is amplified and the image is distorted. This problem is apparent in scans of the film regardless of whether light is reflected from the top or bottom of the film, or is transmitted through the film. However, it is predominant in the rear reflection scan due to the increased light reflected by the antihalation layer. No prior art methods appear to address this significant problem. Generally, during film processing, the dry emulsion layer over the film substrate is subjected to an aqueous bath which causes the emulsion to expand. During electronic film processing, photons penetrating the emulsion strike particles suspended in the emulsion and reemerge to be registered by light sensors. As the emulsion expands, the distance between the photon reflecting particles varies proportionally. If the resulting difference between the photons' exit paths is a quarter wavelength difference, then a speckle point can change from black to white or from white to black. Thus, any attempt to remove the speckle effect by differencing images made while the emulsion is in a first expanded position and a subsequent second expanded position can actually make the speckle effect worse by overlaying two different speckle patterns. For these reasons, coherency speckle is a significant problem in practicing electronic film development.




To view coherent speckle with the human eye, the path length traveled by the light can be no more than the coherency length of the light source. Beyond the coherency length, the speckle shimmers at the speed of light and appears to the viewer to be continuous. The characteristic grainy, or speckled, appearance of laser light, which is a coherent light source, is due to interference effects which result from coherence. Under laser light, everything in a room appears speckled, and the speckles appear to shimmer as the light, object, or viewer move.




Even under ordinary light, speckle is sometimes seen when there are very short path differences and very narrow light angles involved, as for example when viewing a white sheet of paper in direct sunlight. For noncoherent light, the coherency length is on the order of the wavelength divided by the percent bandwidth. Because this usually amounts only to a few wavelengths of light, coherency shimmer is not normally visible in real world viewing where noncoherent light is the norm.




It is, therefore, an object of this invention to provide a method of electronic film development which significantly reduces noise in capturing a developed or developing image.




It is another object of this invention to provide a method of electronic film development which significantly reduces or entirely eliminates coherent speckle in a developed image.




It is yet another object of the present invention to eliminate noise caused by coherent speckle during electronic film development which is altered by emulsion expansion.




To achieve these and other objects which will become readily apparent upon reading the attached disclosure and appended claims, an improved method of electronic film development which significantly reduces the amount of coherent speckle noise in an image is provided. Additional objects, advantages, and novel features of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention may be realized and attained by means of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




According to the present invention, the foregoing and other objects and advantages are attained by an electronic film development method and apparatus by which coherency speckle and other defects are reduced to render commercially viable images. The method and apparatus for reducing noise in electronic film development of a substrate bearing a latent image includes applying a chemical solution to a film substrate to expand the substrate a predetermined amount; allowing the substrate to substantially expand to the predetermined amount; scanning the substrate to generate a first scan of the substrate image; inducing development of the substrate; scanning the substrate after development to generate a second scan; and generating an image with reduced noise from the first and second scan information.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a cross-sectional view of a film layer structure being exposed to light in which the method of this invention can be applied.





FIG. 2

is a cross-sectional view illustrating coherency speckle in a film layer structure.





FIG. 3A

is a cross-sectional view of a film layer undergoing electronic film development before emulsion expansion.





FIG. 3B

is a cross-sectional view of a film layer undergoing electronic film development after emulsion expansion.





FIG. 4

is a graph showing the relationship of emulsion expansion over time upon application of a neutral and alkaline solution.





FIG. 5

is a graph representing the relationship of application of developer and emulsion development over time.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




The invention will now be described in more detail with reference to the various related figures. In the figures, the invention is presented in connection with conventional color film having at least three different layers.

FIG. 1

is a representation of how each of three layers of a film


101


, sensitive to red, green and blue respectively, are viewed when exposed to light. When the developing film is viewed from the top during development, the top layer is seen clearly while the lower layers are substantially occluded by the opacity of the top layer. Viewed from the rear during development, the back layer is seen while the other layers are mostly occluded. Finally, when viewed by light transmitted through the film, the fraction of light that does penetrate all three layers is modulated by all three layers, and so contains a view of all three layers. More specifically, as a light source


100


at the front


102


of the film


101


transmits light


104


through the various layers of the film


101


, a viewer


105


from the front


102


of the film


101


primarily sees light


106


reflected from the blue sensitive layer


108


with some of the light


110


transmitting through all of the layers to be ultimately viewed by viewer


112


from the back


113


of the film


101


. When a light source


114


at the back


113


of the film


101


transmits light


115


through the layers, the viewer


116


sees light


118


reflected from primarily the red sensitive layer


120


. The viewer


116


also detects a reflection


122


from the antihalation layer


124


which includes coherency speckle. This coherency speckle becomes image-related noise which the present invention reduces. Because of the additional light


122


reflected by the antihalation layer


124


, coherency speckle is worse for the rear reflection image; however, coherency speckle also contaminates the front reflection and transmitted images. Thus, its elimination will improve all three images seen by viewers


105


,


112


, and


116


.





FIG. 2

illustrates the phenomenon of coherency speckle in more detail in the context of the present invention. A typical light source


202


emits two photons along paths


204


and


206


. These photons penetrate into a milky diffuser


208


, such as a silver halide emulsion, deposited on a substrate


210


. Depending on the degree of opacity, photons will penetrate a random distance into the diffuser


208


before they hit a particle and are reflected back. The photon of light traveling along path


204


is shown striking particle


212


and reemerging along path


214


. The photon along path


206


strikes particle


216


and reemerges along path


218


. In the illustrated case, both paths


214


and


218


reconverge on a viewer


220


.




When the light source


202


is a source of coherent light such as a laser, the photons emitted along paths


204


and


206


are coherent in that they are in phase with one another along the wavefront of the light. Assuming that the two particles


212


and


216


are so close together so as to appear overlapping at a single point when detected by viewer


220


, the two photons may interfere with each other at the viewer


220


, like ocean waves merging from different angles. In particular, if the total length of the two traversal paths


204


-


214


and


206


-


218


differ from each other by an integer multiple of the wavelength of the coherent light emitted by source


202


, then the photons will constructively interfere with each other at viewer


220


. Thus, their electric vectors will add to produce twice the electric field, and four times the power. If, on the other hand, the path lengths differ by an integer multiple and a half of the light source wavelength, the two photons will interfere destructively, meaning the electric vectors will cancel and produce no light at the viewer


220


. The effect of this phenomenon over a film surface area which is large relative to the light source wavelength is that on average two coherent photons will produce twice the average power of a single photon. However, the point detected by viewer


220


corresponding to the image particles


212


and


216


may either appear very bright or completely black depending on the degree of interference in the reflected light. This effect is known as coherent speckle and it introduces noise in current methods of electronic film development.




Reference is now made to

FIGS. 3A and 3B

for a description of a related speckle problem unique to electronic film development. During film processing in general, the dry emulsion layer


308


over the film


300


is subjected to an aqueous bath which causes the emulsion


308


to expand. Referring now to

FIG. 3A

, a light source


302


emits two photons along paths


304


and


306


. The photons penetrate into the dry emulsion


308


. The photon traveling along path


304


is seen striking particle


312


located within the emulsion


308


and reemerging along path


314


. Similarly, the photon along path


306


strikes particle


316


in the emulsion


308


and reemerges along path


318


. In the illustrated case, both paths


314


and


318


reconverge on a viewer


321


.

FIG. 3B

represents the expanded emulsion


320


after it has been subjected to an aqueous bath. As in

FIG. 3A

, a light source


302


emits two photons along paths


305


and


307


. The photons penetrate the expanded emulsion


320


. The photon along path


305


is seen to strike particle


312


and reemerge along path


322


, and the photon along path


307


strikes particle


316


and reemerges along path


324


. Both paths


322


and


324


reconverge on a viewer


321


. Because of the expansion of the emulsion


320


, the distance between the photon reflecting particles


312


and


316


has also expanded proportional to the expansion of the emulsion


320


. This causes the difference in path length between total path


304


-


314


of the first proton and the total path


306


-


318


traveled by the second proton within emulsion


308


to increase to the greater difference between paths


304


-


322


and


306


-


324


in the expanded emulsion


320


. If the difference in distance between the particles


312


and


316


is only a quarter wavelength (less than one four-thousandths of a millimeter in a typical application using infrared light), then a speckle point can completely change from black to white, or from white to black. Thus, any attempt to remove the speckle effect by differencing an image made with the pre-expanded emulsion


308


from the image made with the expanded emulsion


320


can actually make the speckle effect worse by overlaying two different speckle patterns.




The present invention reduces the amount of coherency speckle detected by electronic film development by scanning a substrate bearing a latent image after the emulsion has expanded to its final thickness but before development has begun, and differencing that scan from the resultant post-development scan.




First, a solution is applied to the emulsion to initiate its full expansion.

FIG. 4

depicts the emulsion thickness which may contribute to the speckle effect, and the relationship between application of both a non-alkaline pH solution (for example, a neutral solution with a pH factor of 7.0 or less, e.g., that of water) and an alkaline pH solution (pH above 7.0) to emulsion and emulsion thickness. Upon application of a neutral pH solution at time


402


, the transit time period


403


begins. The transit time represents the time it takes for the aqueous solution to be absorbed by the front layers of the emulsion prior to reaching the rear layer as seen by the back of the film. Once the liquid reaches the rear of the film, expansion of the film begins at time


407


. The emulsion will continue to expand until it has reached its terminal thickness


405


at time


408


. At time


408


, the emulsion is saturated and will no longer expand.




As illustrated by the graph, the emulsion thickness will vary depending on the pH of the applied emulsion-expanding solution. Upon application of an alkaline pH solution at time


402


, the expansion of the emulsion begins until it reaches its terminal thickness


406


at time


408


. According to the present invention, it is after time


408


when the terminal thickness of the emulsion has been reached, but before development has begun, that the prescan of the substrate is optimum for minimizing or eliminating coherent speckle.




One suitable solution for expanding the emulsion is a developer which contains no developing agent. Staple types of developers include HC-110 manufactured by Eastman Kodak of Rochester, N.Y. diluted to a 1:7 ratio. Alternatively, the emulsion-expanding solution could be an activating agent which enables the developing agent to work by elevating the pH of the solution to alkalinity. Typical alkaline activators dissolved in aqueous carriers include but are not limited to sodium sulfite and sodium carbonate.




In another embodiment of the invention, a developer containing a developing agent is applied to the film emulsion. The developing agent reduces silver halide crystals containing latent image centers. Suitable developing agents include but are not limited to Elon, phenidone, and hydroquinone dissolved in an aqueous carrier and are commonly manufactured by Eastman Kodak, Agfa, and others. In this case, the prescan must be done upon the emulsion reaching its final expansion but before the beginning of substantial development.

FIG. 5

represents the time relationship between application of the developer and development of the emulsion. Upon developer application at time


502


, there is a specific time period, called the induction time


504


, before development of the film begins at inertia point


506


. As the induction time proceeds, the optical density of the emulsion increases. There may be a time during which the emulsion expansion and film development phases overlap. In this embodiment, the prescan is optimally performed before the end of the induction time


504


but after the emulsion has substantially expanded. A prescan taken at this point represents the final coherency speckle pattern devoid of unwanted reduced silver halide grains.




If the solution applied to the emulsion is a developer with a developing agent, development begins immediately after the inertia point of the developing agent is reached. If the solution applied to the emulsion did not contain a developing agent, then there is an arbitrarily long time after the film has expanded during which the scan may be made. Once the developing agent is added to the solution on the film, the induction time


504


begins to run. After development has begun, a plurality of scans are performed at spaced time intervals. These scans are then combined into a single post-development scan as is already known in the electronic film development art. The present invention takes the post-development scan containing image and speckle information and differences it pixel by pixel from the prescan information which contains the speckle pattern without the image. During the differencing procedure, a first image and a second image are received in a computer as pixels. Each pixel has a numerical value representing a characteristic, such as luminance, of the substrate corresponding to that pixel. The corresponding pixel information in the first image and second image are combined to create pixel values which will generate a third image in which the speckle pattern has been decreased or entirely eliminated. The combining function may consist of any of a number of mathematical steps or combination of steps including, but not limited to, dividing and subtracting. As a result of combining the first and second images in the present invention, the speckle pattern will be nulled out or significantly reduced.




In general two-component film development, a non-alkaline solution comprising a developing agent is typically applied first, then an alkaline activator is applied subsequently. However, there are situations in which a better result may be obtained if the order in which the agents are applied is reversed or if both developer and activator agents are applied in a single solution that comprises both developer agents and activator agents. The combined solution approach is more common in the art of film development.




While this invention has been described with an emphasis upon certain preferred embodiments, variations in the preferred composition and method may be used and the embodiments may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein. Accordingly, the invention as defined by the following claims includes all modifications encompassed within the spirit and scope thereof.



Claims
  • 1. An electronic film processing system capable of processing a film image, wherein the film image has at least one emulsion layer having at least one noise effect, comprising:an applicator capable of applying at least one solution to the film image; at least one scanner capable of scanning the film image to form a first scan image and at least one second scan image; and a computer capable of combining the first scan image with the at least one second scan image to form a digital image with the at least one noise effect decreased.
  • 2. The system of claim 1 wherein the at least one solution is capable of initiating expansion of the emulsion layer.
  • 3. The system of claim 1 wherein the at least one solution comprises a developing agent.
  • 4. The system of claim 1 wherein the at least one solution has an alkaline pH.
  • 5. The system of claim 1 wherein the first scan image is a scan of the film image in an expanded, undeveloped condition.
  • 6. The system of claim 1 wherein each second scan image is a scan of the film image in an expanded, at least partially developed condition.
  • 7. The system of claim 1 wherein each scanner comprises a CCD-array image detector.
  • 8. The system of claim 1 wherein each scanner comprises a light source capable of projecting linear light beam of uniform, diffuse illumination.
  • 9. A film scanning station apparatus for forming at least one digital image from a film image, wherein the film image has at least one emulsion layer with at least one noise effect in the at least one emulsion layer, the apparatus comprising:at least one bath filled with at least one solution; a first scanner capable of scanning the film image to form a first scan image; at least one second scanner capable of scanning the film image to form at least one second scan image; a transporter capable of moving the film image through each bath and each scanner; a computer capable of receiving pixel values from the first scan image and the at least one second scan image and capable of combining the pixel values to form a digital image with at least one noise effect decreased.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein the at least one bath has a solution that comprises an expanding agent.
  • 11. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein the at least one bath has a solution that comprises a developing agent.
  • 12. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein the at least one solution has an alkaline pH level.
  • 13. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein the first scan image is a scan of the film image in an expanded, undeveloped condition.
  • 14. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein each second scan image is a scan of the film image in an expanded, at least partially developed condition.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein at least one of the at least one second scan image is a scan of the film image in an expanded, fully developed condition.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein each scanner comprises a CCD-array image detector.
  • 17. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein each scanner comprises a light source capable of projecting linear light beam of uniform, diffuse illumination.
RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation application of Ser. No. 08/979,038 filed Nov. 26, 1997, U.S. Pat. No. 6,069,714 which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/032,114, filed Dec. 5, 1996.

US Referenced Citations (133)
Number Name Date Kind
2404138 Mayer Oct 1946 A
3520689 Nagae et al. Jul 1970 A
3520690 Nagae et al. Jul 1970 A
3587435 Chioffe Jun 1971 A
3615479 Kohler et al. Oct 1971 A
3615498 Aral Oct 1971 A
3617282 Bard Nov 1971 A
3747120 Stemme Jul 1973 A
3833161 Krumbein Sep 1974 A
3903541 Von Meister et al. Sep 1975 A
3946398 Kyser et al. Mar 1976 A
3959048 Stanfield et al. May 1976 A
4026756 Stanfield et al. May 1977 A
4081577 Horner Mar 1978 A
4142107 Hatzakis et al. Feb 1979 A
4215927 Grant et al. Aug 1980 A
4249985 Stanfield Feb 1981 A
4265545 Slaker May 1981 A
4301469 Modeen et al. Nov 1981 A
4490729 Clark et al. Dec 1984 A
4501480 Matsui et al. Feb 1985 A
4564280 Fukuda Jan 1986 A
4594598 Iwagami Jun 1986 A
4621037 Kanda et al. Nov 1986 A
4623236 Stella Nov 1986 A
4633300 Sakai Dec 1986 A
4636808 Herron Jan 1987 A
4666307 Matsumoto et al. May 1987 A
4670779 Nagano Jun 1987 A
4736221 Shidara Apr 1988 A
4741621 Taft et al. May 1988 A
4745040 Levine May 1988 A
4755844 Tsuchiya et al. Jul 1988 A
4777102 Levine Oct 1988 A
4796061 Ikeda et al Jan 1989 A
4814630 Lim Mar 1989 A
4821114 Gebhardt Apr 1989 A
4845551 Matsumoto Jul 1989 A
4851311 Millis et al. Jul 1989 A
4857430 Millis et al. Aug 1989 A
4875067 Kanzaki et al. Oct 1989 A
4957900 Yamazaki Sep 1990 A
4969045 Haruki et al. Nov 1990 A
4994918 Lingemann Feb 1991 A
5027146 Manico et al. Jun 1991 A
5034767 Netz et al. Jul 1991 A
5079222 Yamazaki Jan 1992 A
5091972 Kwon et al. Feb 1992 A
5101286 Patton Mar 1992 A
5124216 Giapis et al. Jun 1992 A
5155596 Kurtz et al. Oct 1992 A
5196285 Thomson Mar 1993 A
5200817 Birnbaum Apr 1993 A
5212512 Shiota May 1993 A
5231439 Takahashi et al. Jul 1993 A
5235352 Pies et al. Aug 1993 A
5255408 Blaxkman Oct 1993 A
5266805 Edgar Nov 1993 A
5267030 Giorgianni et al. Nov 1993 A
5292605 Thomson Mar 1994 A
5296923 Hung Mar 1994 A
5334247 Columbus et al. Aug 1994 A
5350651 Evans et al. Sep 1994 A
5350664 Simons Sep 1994 A
5357307 Glanville et al. Oct 1994 A
5360701 Elton et al. Nov 1994 A
5371542 Pauli et al. Dec 1994 A
5391443 Simmons et et Feb 1995 A
5414779 Mitch May 1995 A
5416550 Skye et al. May 1995 A
5418119 Simons May 1995 A
5418597 Lahcanski et al. May 1995 A
5432579 Tokuda Jul 1995 A
5436738 Manico Jul 1995 A
5440365 Gates et al. Aug 1995 A
5447811 Buhr et al. Sep 1995 A
5448380 Park Sep 1995 A
5452018 Capitant et a Sep 1995 A
5465155 Edgar Nov 1995 A
5477345 Tse Dec 1995 A
5496669 Pforr et al. Mar 1996 A
5516608 Hobbs et al. May 1996 A
5519510 Edgar May 1996 A
5546477 Knowles et al. Aug 1996 A
5550566 Hodgsone et al. Aug 1996 A
5552904 Ryoo et ert Sep 1996 A
5563717 Koeng et al. Oct 1996 A
5568270 Endo Oct 1996 A
5576836 Sano et al. Nov 1996 A
5581376 Harrington Dec 1996 A
5587752 Petruchik Dec 1996 A
5596415 Cosgrove et al. Jan 1997 A
5627016 Manico May 1997 A
5641596 Gray et al. Jun 1997 A
5649260 Wheeler et al. Jul 1997 A
5664253 Meyers Sep 1997 A
5664255 Meyers Sep 1997 A
5667944 Reen et all. Sep 1997 A
5678116 Sugimoto et al. Oct 1997 A
5691118 Haye Nov 1997 A
5695914 Simon et al. Dec 1997 A
5698382 Nakahanada et al. Dec 1997 A
5726773 Mehlo et al. Mar 1998 A
5739897 Frick et al. Apr 1998 A
5771107 Flujimoto et al. Jun 1998 A
5790277 Edgar Aug 1998 A
5835795 Craig et al. Nov 1998 A
5835811 Tsumura Nov 1998 A
5870172 Blume Feb 1999 A
5880819 Tanaka et al. Mar 1999 A
5892595 Yamakawa et al. Apr 1999 A
5930388 Murakami et al. Jul 1999 A
5959720 Kwon et al. Sep 1999 A
5963662 Vachtsevanos et al. Oct 1999 A
5966465 Keith et al. Oct 1999 A
5979011 Mixawaki et al. Nov 1999 A
5982936 Tucker et al. Nov 1999 A
5982937 Accad Nov 1999 A
5982941 Loveridge et al. Nov 1999 A
5982951 Katayama et al. Nov 1999 A
5988896 Edgar Nov 1999 A
5991444 Burt et al. Nov 1999 A
5998109 Hirabayashi Dec 1999 A
6000284 Shin et al. Dec 1999 A
6005987 Nakamura et al. Dec 1999 A
6065827 Bullock et al. May 2000 A
6069714 Edgar May 2000 A
6088084 Nishio Jul 2000 A
6089687 Helterline Jul 2000 A
6101273 Matama Aug 2000 A
6102508 Cowger Aug 2000 A
6137965 Burgeios et al. Oct 2000 A
6200738 Takano et al. Mar 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (31)
Number Date Country
261 782 Aug 1987 EP
0 482 790 Sep 1991 EP
0 525 886 Jul 1992 EP
0 580 293 Jan 1994 EP
0 601 364 Jun 1994 EP
0 669 753 Feb 1995 EP
0 794 454 Feb 1997 EP
0 768 571 Apr 1997 EP
0 806 861 Nov 1997 EP
0 878 777 Nov 1998 EP
0 930 498 Dec 1998 EP
350183 Jan 1999 TW
WO 9001240 Feb 1990 WO
WO 9109493 Jun 1991 WO
WO 9725652 Jul 1997 WO
WO 9819216 May 1998 WO
WO 9825399 Jun 1998 WO
WO 9831142 Jul 1998 WO
WO 9834157 Aug 1998 WO
WO 9834397 Aug 1998 WO
WO 9943148 Aug 1999 WO
WO 9943149 Aug 1999 WO
WO 0101197 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0113174 Feb 2001 WO
WO 0145042 Jun 2001 WO
WO 0150192 Jul 2001 WO
WO 0150193 Jul 2001 WO
WO 0150194 Jul 2001 WO
WO 0150196 Jul 2001 WO
WO 0150197 Jul 2001 WO
WO 0152556 Jul 2001 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (11)
Entry
“Adaptive Fourier Threshold Filtering: A Method to Reduce Noise and Incoherent Artifacts in High Resolution Cardiac Images”, Doyle, M., et al., 8306 Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 31, No. 5, Baltimore, MD, May, pp. 546-550, 1994.
“Anisotropic Spectral Magnitude Estimation Filters for Noise Reduction and Image Enhancement”, Aich, T., et al., Philips GmbH Research Laboratories, IEEE, pp. 335-338, 1996.
“Adaptive-neighborhood filtering of images corrupted by signal-dependent noise”, Rangayyan, R., et al., Applied Optics, vol. 37, No. 20, pp. 4477-4487, Jul. 10, 1998.
“Grayscale Characteristics”, The Nature of Color Images, Photographic Negatives, pp. 163-168.
“Parallel Production of Oligonucleotide Arrays Using Membranes and Reagent Jet Printing”, Stimpson, D., et al., Research Reports, BioTechniques, vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 886-890, 1998.
“Low-Cost Display Assembly and Interconnect Using Ink-Jet Printing Technology”, Hayes, D. et al., Display Works '99, MicroFab Technologies, Inc., pp. 1-4, 1999.
“Ink-Jet Based Fluid Microdispensing in Biochemical Applications”, Wallace, D., MicroFab Technologies, Inc., Laboratory Automation News, vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 6-9, Nov., 1996.
“Protorealistic Ink-Jet Printing Through Dynamic Spot Size Control”, Wallace, D., Journal of Imaging Science and Technology, vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 390-395, Sep./Oct. 1996.
“MicroJet Printing of Solder and Polymers for Multi-Chip Modules and Chip-Scale Package”, Hayes, D., et al., MicroFab Technologies, Inc.
“A Method of Characterisstics Model of a Drop-on-Demand Ink-Jet Device Using an Integral Method Drop Formation Model”, Wallace, D., MicroFab Technologies, Inc., The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Winter Annual Meeting, pp. 1-9, Dec. 10-15, 1989.
“Digital Imaging Equipment White Papers”, Putting Damaged Film on ICE, www.nikonusa.com/reference/whitepapers/imaging, Nikon Corporation, Nov. 28, 2000.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/032114 Dec 1996 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 08/979038 Nov 1997 US
Child 09/487967 US