The invention pertains to machine vision. It has application, by way of example, in alignment of wafers during semiconductor wafer fabrication.
Semiconductor chip manufacture is a multistage process in which silicon or other wafers are subjected to a series of processing steps by modular wafer processing units or “systems.” Those units, each of which typically performs one or more dedicated processing steps, are arrayed along the floor of a factory or “fab.” Wafers are transported among and between the units by conveyors, robots and so forth.
Before a wafer can be processed by a processing system, the wafer's position and alignment must be established. This insures that lithography and/or other steps performed by the unit are properly directed, both with respect to features inherent to the wafer (e.g., directionally-oriented crystalline structures) and with respect to processing already (or to be) performed on it by other units.
In most of today's modular wafer fabrication systems, initial alignment of the wafer is performed by a mechanical pre-aligner that spins the wafer and uses a linear camera to find the wafer's alignment indicator (e.g., a notch or “flat” along the perimeter of the round wafer). Once it finds the notch (or flat), the pre-aligner spins a chuck and platform on which the wafer sits in order to orient the wafer to a known angle and, thereby, to ready it for processing within the unit. The pre-aligner may be used repeatedly during processing of a single wafer and/or prior to its transfer to another unit in the fab.
A problem with today's pre-aligners is that they are expensive and slow. They can cost up to $20,000 and typically require up to five seconds to perform an alignment. Since each additional second consumed during pre-alignment can cost the fab thousands of dollars, or more, it is desirable to reduce those times, as well as the cost of the pre-aligners themselves. Another problem is that they can be inaccurate and/or require touching the backside of each wafer. Since today's pre-aligners spin wafers on a mechanical chuck, they can only be as accurate as allowed by the mechanical tolerances of the spinning chuck.
An object of the invention is to provide improved methods and apparatus for machine vision.
A related object is to provide such methods and apparatus as can be applied in semiconductor wafer fabrication.
Still further objects are to provide such methods and apparatus as can be applied in alignment of wafers.
Yet still further objects of the invention are to provide such methods and apparatus as can be used in wafer fabrication systems.
Still yet further objects of the invention are to provide such methods and apparatus as operate quickly.
Yet still yet further objects of the invention are to provide such methods and apparatus as can be implemented at low cost.
Further objects of the invention are to provide such methods and apparatus as improve the accuracy of pre-aligners so as to handle the smaller tolerances of each successive generation of semiconductor manufacturing technology.
Still further objects of the invention are to provide such methods and apparatus as facilitate the use of pre-aligners that avoid touching the backside of wafers that are being processed and that, therefore, improve yield by reducing contamination.
Still yet further objects of the invention are to provide such methods and apparatus as can be used with extant and future wafer fabrication processes and equipment.
The foregoing are among the objects attained by the invention which provides, in some aspects, a wafer alignment system comprising an image acquisition device, an illumination source, a rotatable wafer platform, and an image processor that includes functionality for mapping coordinates in an image of an article (such as a wafer) on the platform to a “world” frame of reference at each of a plurality of angles of rotation of the platform.
Related aspects of the invention provide a wafer alignment system as described above in which the platform holds the article (e.g., wafer) on a plane having a normal that precesses as the platform rotates.
Further related aspects of the invention provide such systems in which the platform is disposed on and rotationally coupled to a chuck, the axis of rotation of which is not normal to the holding plane of the platform. Accordingly, the platform rotates as the chuck rotates and the normal to the platform's holding plane precesses during the course of that rotation.
In other aspects, the invention provides such systems in which the world frame of reference is independent of one or more frames of reference defined by the platform, e.g., at its various angles of rotation. In further related aspects of the invention, the world frame of reference is planar.
According to further aspects of the invention, the mapping functionality comprises a discrete function, mapping coordinates in an image of an article (e.g., wafer) on the platform to the world frame of reference for each of two or more discrete angles of the platform. In other aspects of the invention, the mapping functionality comprises a continuous function, mapping coordinates in an image of an article (e.g., wafer) on the platform to the world frame of reference as a continuous function of the angle of the platform.
In still further aspects, the invention provides a system as described above in which the illumination source provides backlighting for the article (e.g., wafer) on the platform. In related aspects, the source provides that backlighting at an angle parallel to the normal to the holding plane of the platform. In still further related aspects of the invention, the source is disposed in the holding plane of the platform. In yet further related aspects of the invention, the source comprises a planar source that is disposed between the article (e.g., wafer) and the platform. According to further related aspects of the invention, the source comprises an electroluminescent light source.
Other aspects of the invention provide a system as described above in which the image acquisition device is arranged to acquire an image of the entire article (e.g., wafer)—or, at least, of a sufficient portion thereof to enable determination of the article's (or a characteristic's thereof) position and/or orientation—in a single field of view.
Still other aspects of the invention provide a system as described above in which the image processor comprises functionality for determining at least one of a position and orientation of an article disposed on the platform as a function of one or more features shown in the image (e.g., in the frame of reference of the image acquisition device and/or in the world frame of reference).
Further aspects of the invention provide methods for wafer alignment paralleling operation of the system described above. Such aspects include, for example, acquiring an image of an article (e.g., wafer) on the platform, determining in the frame of reference of the image acquisition device any of a position and orientation of the article (or of a feature thereon), and converting that position and/or orientation to the world frame of reference. The position and/or orientation so converted can be used, e.g., by a robotic arm (or otherwise) to position the article for further processing or inspection.
These and other aspects of the invention are evident in the drawings and in the description that follows.
A more complete understanding of the invention may be attained by reference to the drawings, in which:
In the illustrated embodiment, those units 12-16 are arrayed along a floor of the facility 10, though, in other embodiments they may be disposed otherwise (e.g., in separate processing areas of a single facility, dispersed among remote facilities, and so forth). Wafers are transported among and between the units 12-16 by fully-, semi-, or non-automated mechanisms, such as conveyors (not shown), robotic arms 18, manual labor (not shown) and so forth, all as known in the art. One such wafer 20 is shown in an end effector of arm 18.
Each system 12-16 includes one or more subsystems that perform the wafer processing steps of the respective system. Four such subsystems 22-28 are shown with respect to system 12. These include a wafer alignment subsystem 22 according to the invention, as well as three other subsystems of the type known in the art for lithography or other wafer processing steps. Robotic arm 29 or another conveyance (not shown) can be provided within the system 12 for moving the wafer among and between subsystems, e.g., in the conventional manner known in the art. A local controller 32 can also be provided, e.g., for controlling operations within the system 12 in the conventional manner known in the art (as adapted to the teachings hereof), as well as for coordinating operations with the other systems, e.g., via a system controller 34 that controls overall system operations (including that of arm or conveyance 18) in the conventional manner known in the art (again, as adapted to the teachings hereof). It will be appreciated that a greater or lesser number of subsystems and/or conveyances may be used in system 12, and that the other systems 14-16 may be similarly configured.
Wafer alignment subsystem (or “pre-aligner”) 22 determines the position and/or alignment (preferably, both) of a wafer 30 in the respective system 12. This insures, for example, that lithography and/or other steps performed by the system 12 are properly directed, both with respect to features inherent to the wafer 30 (e.g., directionally-oriented crystalline structures) and with respect to processing already (or to be) performed on it by other systems 14-16.
More particularly, pre-aligner 22 determines a location of a center and/or other feature of wafer 20. That other feature can be, for example, the wafer's characteristic “flat” or “notch.” As well, it can be an alignment mark or other pattern etched or otherwise extent, e.g., on the surface of the wafer. In addition, the pre-aligner 22 determines an orientation of the wafer. In accord with convention, in the illustrated embodiment, this represents an angle of rotation of the wafer flat or notch, though, other embodiments may utilize other features for such orientation determination.
Once it determines the location and/or orientation of the wafer 30, the pre-aligner 22 communicates that to the controller 32 or other components of the illustrated facility 10 so that the wafer can be moved by arms or other conveyances 18, 29 and processed further within system 12, within one or more other systems 14-16, or within the facility 10 as a whole. The pre-aligner 22 communicates location and/or orientation information in a “world” frame of reference (FoR) system 36 that is common to the systems 12-16, though, in other embodiments it may be common only to the respective system 12, one or more other systems 14-16, and/or the facility 10 as a whole. To this end, pre-aligner 22 converts information discerned from images acquired by its camera 40 from the FoR of that camera to the world FoR, as discussed further below and elsewhere herein.
Camera 40 comprises a conventional image acquisition device of the type used in the art. Preferably, it is positioned and configured to obtain an image of an entire wafer 30 in a single field of view (FoV) 41, thus, eliminating the need to acquire multiple disparate images in order to discern the position and/or location of the wafer. A benefit of the illustrated pre-aligner is that camera 40 can be of relatively low resolution, e.g., with image pixels that resolve to 650 microns (or better) on the wafer 30 surface and, yet, still permit resolution of wafer location and position to 20 microns (or better). A preferred camera 40 is an In-Sight® available from the assignee hereof.
Source 42 illuminates features of the wafer 30 used for position and/or orientation determination. In the illustrated embodiment, the source 42 backlights the wafer 30 in order to emphasize its perimeter in images that camera 40 acquires and that image processor 48 processes for position and/or orientation determination. Preferably, as in the illustrated embodiment, such backlighting is provided by a low-profile element providing uniform illumination disposed, e.g., at the same level as the platform 46 and just below the wafer 32. Preferably this is accomplished with a circular-shaped platform with a diameter slightly smaller than the wafer and an annular-shaped backlight whose inner diameter is larger than the platform and whose outer diameter is larger than the wafer. Such an element 42 can be fabricated in the manner of the illumination source described in copending, commonly-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/162,540, filed Sep. 14, 2005, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Backlighting a Wafer during Alignment,” the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Platform 46 holds the wafer 30 for imaging by camera 40 and rotation by chuck 44. To this end, the platform defines an imaginary plane 52 in which the wafer 30 is held, e.g., by friction, suction, or otherwise. In the illustrated embodiment, that plane 52 is generally normal to an axis of a cone defining the FoV 41 of camera 40, though, in other embodiments, the plane and camera may be oriented otherwise. The plane 52 is, moreover, generally—though, as discussed below, not fully—normal to an axis of rotation 53 of the chuck 44 on which it (the plane 52) is disposed and to which it is rotationally coupled, in the manner known in the art. The chuck is, itself, disposed on and rotationally coupled to a computer-controlled motor 54, as shown, in the manner known in the art.
Referring to
Referring back to
Image processor 48 comprises a general- or special-purpose digital data processor of the type known in the art for analyzing images generated by camera 40, e.g., to identify the coordinates of features therein and to perform transformations thereon. To this end, the image processor 48 includes a central processing unit (not shown), memory (not shown) and input/output interface (not shown), all of the conventional type for executing software, e.g., stored in the memory. In the illustrated embodiment, that software causes the image processor 48 to perform the following functions:
Of course, it will be appreciated that the functionality of modules 60-66 may be combined in fewer modules and/or distributed among a greater number, indeed, including to among components of the pre-aligner 22 or system 12 or otherwise.
With respect to module 64, the pre-aligner 22 maps locations determined by module 62 using a mapping function that relates coordinates in the FoR of the wafer image acquired by module 60 to the coordinates in the world FoR. The mapping function, which can be continuous or discrete, defines that relation as a function of the angular rotation of the computer-controlled chuck and platform 44, 46, e.g., as expressed below:
[x,y]FoR(world)=ƒ([x,y]FoR(image),ωplatform) Eq. 1
where,
As those skilled in the art will appreciate from the text above, because holding plane 52 established by the platform 46 is not normal to the axis 53, the functions ƒ of Eq. 1 varies with ω. In the illustrated embodiment, that function ƒ is determined empirically, e.g., during assembly or installation of the system 12, pre-aligner 22, by the following steps:
Of course, steps 1-6 represent just one way to create the function ƒ. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the function can be constructed in other ways in view of the teachings hereof.
Described above are methods and apparatus meeting the objects set forth earlier, among others. This includes, among other things, improving pre-aligner accuracy so as to handle the small and increasingly smaller tolerances of today's and successive generations of semiconductor manufacturing technology. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the illustrated embodiments are merely examples of the invention and that other embodiments incorporating modifications thereto fall within the scope of the invention. Thus, by way of example, it will be appreciated that a pre-aligner according to the invention can be utilized with an edge-gripping rotation station that avoids touching the backside of wafers in process and, thereby, minimizes the risk of contamination. In view of the foregoing, what we claim is:
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3816722 | Sakoe et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3936800 | Ejiri et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
| 3967100 | Shimomura | Jun 1976 | A |
| 3968475 | McMahon | Jul 1976 | A |
| 3978326 | Shimomura | Aug 1976 | A |
| 4011403 | Epstein et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4115702 | Nopper | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4115762 | Akiyama et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4183013 | Agrawala et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4200861 | Hubach et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4238780 | Doemens | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4254400 | Yoda et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4286293 | Jablonowski | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4300164 | Sacks | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4385322 | Hubach et al. | May 1983 | A |
| 4435837 | Abernathy | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4441124 | Heebner et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4441206 | Kuniyoshi et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4519041 | Fant et al. | May 1985 | A |
| 4534813 | Williamson et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4541116 | Lougheed | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4545067 | Juvin et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4570180 | Baier et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4577344 | Warren et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4581762 | Lapidus et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4606065 | Beg et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4617619 | Gehly | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4630306 | West et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4631750 | Gabriel et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4641349 | Flom et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4688088 | Hamazaki et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4697075 | Roos et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4706168 | Weisner | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4707647 | Coldren et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4728195 | Silver | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4730260 | Mori et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4731858 | Grasmueller et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4736437 | Sacks et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4742551 | Deering | May 1988 | A |
| 4752898 | Koenig | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4758782 | Kobayashi | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4764870 | Haskin | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4771469 | Wittenburg | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4776027 | Hisano et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4782238 | Radl et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4783826 | Koso | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4783828 | Sadjadi | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4783829 | Miyakawa et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4803735 | Nishida et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4809077 | Norita et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4821333 | Gillies | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4831580 | Yamada | May 1989 | A |
| 4860374 | Murakami et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4860375 | McCubbrey et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4876457 | Bose | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4876728 | Roth | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4891767 | Rzasa et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4903218 | Longo et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4907169 | Lovoi | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4908874 | Gabriel | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4912559 | Ariyoshi et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4912659 | Liang | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4914553 | Hamada et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4922543 | Ahlbom et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4924086 | Webber | May 1990 | A |
| 4926492 | Tanaka et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4932065 | Feldgajer | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4953224 | Ichinose et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4955062 | Terui | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4959898 | Landman et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4962423 | Yamada et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4969037 | Poleschinski et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4972359 | Silver et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4982438 | Usami et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5005126 | Haskin | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5012402 | Akiyama | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5012433 | Callahan et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5012524 | Le Beau | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5027419 | Davis | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5046190 | Daniel et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5048094 | Aoyama et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5054096 | Beizer | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5060276 | Morris et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5063608 | Siegel | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5073958 | Imme | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5081656 | Baker et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5081689 | Meyer et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5083073 | Kato | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5086478 | Kelly-Mahaffey et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5090576 | Menten | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5091861 | Geller et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5091968 | Higgins et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5093867 | Hori et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5113565 | Cipolla et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5115309 | Hang | May 1992 | A |
| 5119435 | Berkin | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5124622 | Kawamura et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5133022 | Weideman | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5134575 | Takagi | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5143436 | Baylor et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5145432 | Midland et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5151951 | Ueda et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5153925 | Tanioka et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5155775 | Brown | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5159281 | Hedstrom et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5159645 | Kumagai | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5164994 | Bushroe | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5168269 | Harlan | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5175808 | Sayre | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5179419 | Palmquist et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5185810 | Freischlad | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5185855 | Kato et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5189712 | Kajiwara et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5204944 | Wolberg et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5206820 | Ammann et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5216503 | Paik | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5225940 | Ishii et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5230027 | Kikuchi | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5243607 | Masson et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5253306 | Nishio | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5253308 | Johnson | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5259038 | Sakou et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5265173 | Griffin et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5271068 | Ueda et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5287449 | Kojima | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5297238 | Wang et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5297256 | Wolstenholme et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5299269 | Gaborski et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5307419 | Tsujino et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5311598 | Bose et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5315388 | Shen et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5319457 | Nakahashi et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5327156 | Masukane et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5329469 | Watanabe | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5337262 | Luthi et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5337267 | Colavin | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5363507 | Nakayama et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5367439 | Mayer et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5367667 | Wahlquist et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5371690 | Engel et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5371836 | Mitomi et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5381004 | Uritsky et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5388197 | Rayner | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5388252 | Dreste et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5398292 | Aoyama | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5432525 | Maruo et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5440699 | Farrand et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5455870 | Sepai et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5455933 | Schieve et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5471312 | Watanabe et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5475766 | Tsuchiya et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5475803 | Stearns et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5477138 | Erjavic et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5481712 | Silver et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5485570 | Busboom et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5491780 | Fyles et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5495424 | Tokura | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5495537 | Bedrosian et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5496106 | Anderson | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5497007 | Uritsky et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5500906 | Picard et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5506617 | Parulski et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5506682 | Pryor | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5511015 | Flockencier | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5519840 | Matias et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5526050 | King et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5528703 | Lee | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5532739 | Garakani et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5539409 | Mathews et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5544256 | Brecher et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5548326 | Michael | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5550763 | Michael | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5550888 | Neitzel et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5553859 | Kelly et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5557410 | Huber et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5557690 | O'Gorman et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5559904 | Holzmann | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5566877 | McCormack | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5568563 | Tanaka et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5574668 | Beaty | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5574801 | Collet-Beillon | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5581632 | Koljonen et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5583949 | Smith et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5583954 | Garakani | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5585917 | Woite et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5586058 | Aloni et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5592562 | Rooks | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5594859 | Palmer et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5598345 | Tokura | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5602937 | Bedrosian et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5608490 | Ogawa | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5608872 | Schwartz et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5621811 | Roder et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5627915 | Rosser et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5640199 | Garakani et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5640200 | Michael | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5642158 | Petry, III et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5647009 | Aoki et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5649032 | Burt et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5652658 | Jackson et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5657403 | Wolff et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5673334 | Nichani et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5675358 | Bullock et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5676302 | Petry, III | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5684530 | White | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5696848 | Patti et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5715369 | Spoltman et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5715385 | Stearns et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5717785 | Silver | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5724439 | Mizuoka et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5734807 | Sumi | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5739846 | Gieskes | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5739913 | Wallace | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5740285 | Bloomberg et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5742037 | Scola et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5751853 | Michael | May 1998 | A |
| 5754679 | Koljonen et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5757956 | Koljonen et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5761326 | Brady et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5761337 | Nishimura et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5768443 | Michael et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5793899 | Wolff et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5796386 | Lipscomb et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5796868 | Dutta-Choudhury | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5801966 | Ohashi | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5805722 | Cullen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5809658 | Jackson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5818443 | Schott | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5822055 | Tsai et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5825483 | Michael et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5825913 | Rostami et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5835099 | Marimont | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5835622 | Koljonen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5845007 | Ohashi et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5847714 | Naqvi et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5848189 | Pearson et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5850466 | Schott | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5859923 | Petry, III et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5861909 | Garakani et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5870495 | Mancuso et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5872870 | Michael | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5878152 | Sussman | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5900975 | Sussman | May 1999 | A |
| 5901241 | Koljonen et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5909504 | Whitman | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5912768 | Sissom et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5912984 | Michael et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5918196 | Jacobson | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5933523 | Drisko et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5943441 | Michael | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5949901 | Nichani et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5953130 | Benedict et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5960125 | Michael et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5974169 | Bachelder | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5974365 | Mitchell | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5978080 | Michael et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5978081 | Michael et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5978502 | Ohashi | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5978521 | Wallack et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5982132 | Colby | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5982474 | Akiyama et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6002738 | Cabral et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6002793 | Silver et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6016152 | Dickie | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6025854 | Hinz et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6025905 | Sussman | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6026176 | Whitman | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6067379 | Silver | May 2000 | A |
| 6069668 | Woodham, Jr. et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6075881 | Foster et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6084631 | Tonkin et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6118540 | Roy et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6137893 | Michael et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141033 | Michael et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141040 | Toh | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6170973 | Benedict | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6188784 | Linker, Jr. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6191850 | Chiang | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6215915 | Reyzin | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6236769 | Desai | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6259827 | Nichani | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6275742 | Sagues et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6282328 | Desai | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6298149 | Nichani et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6301396 | Michael et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6341878 | Chiang | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6381366 | Taycher et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6381375 | Reyzin | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6389029 | McAlear | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6396949 | Nichani | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6442291 | Whitman | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6477275 | Melikian et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6516092 | Bachelder et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6639624 | Bachelder et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6658145 | Silver et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6684402 | Wolff | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6728582 | Wallack | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6748104 | Bachelder et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6771808 | Wallack | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6850646 | Silver et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6856698 | Silver et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6900877 | Raaijmakers | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6914679 | Nettekoven et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6933172 | Tomimatsu | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 7006669 | Lavagnino et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7042568 | Mayo | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7048400 | Murasko et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7225734 | Schanz | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7295314 | Spady et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 20050007792 | Li | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0 265 302 | Sep 1987 | EP |
| 0 341 122 | Apr 1989 | EP |
| 0 527 632 | Feb 1993 | EP |
| 0 777 381 | Jun 1997 | EP |
| 0 895 696 | Feb 1999 | EP |
| 2 598 019 | Oct 1987 | FR |
| WO 9110968 | Jul 1991 | WO |
| WO 9511491 | Apr 1995 | WO |
| WO 9521376 | Aug 1995 | WO |
| WO 9522137 | Aug 1995 | WO |
| WO 9721189 | Jun 1997 | WO |
| WO 9722858 | Jun 1997 | WO |
| WO 9724692 | Jul 1997 | WO |
| WO 9724693 | Jul 1997 | WO |
| WO 9739416 | Oct 1997 | WO |
| WO 9830890 | Jul 1998 | WO |
| WO 9852349 | Nov 1998 | WO |
| WO 9859490 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| WO 9915864 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| WO 9927456 | Jun 1999 | WO |
| WO 9948000 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO 02099615 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| WO 02100068 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| WO 2007044629 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080050006 A1 | Feb 2008 | US |