Screening of wastewater is a common method of treatment at wastewater treatment plants. Wastewater screens have been used to remove large or inert solids for collection and disposal for over a century. Wastewater screening to remove such debris typically occurs prior to the activated sludge process. More recently, screening has also been conducted within the activated sludge process itself to select and remove inert material. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,541,933, 5,824,222 and 7,569,147 each discuss variations of this concept for the removal of inert-materials from activated sludge. Another use of screens is described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,959,124, in which screened activated sludge solids can be returned to increase the solids retention time and the capacity of the overall process. In this process, the focus is on retention of activated sludge generally and not on selection of particular constituents in the activated sludge. None of these previously disclosed processes uses screens for both ‘selection’ and ‘retention’ of solids.
A current operational drawback of an activated sludge process is that the solids retention time is the same for all of the fractions in the activated sludge. This drawback has been overcome, for example, by using plastic media to retain organisms on biofilms for longer solids residence times. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,458,779 and 7,854,843. Other options include the use of cyclones that can differentiate based on specific gravity. An improved selection process for retaining particular constituents of the activated sludge is desired.
The disclosed embodiments include a selection process using screens for retaining particular constituents based on size and compressibility thereof. In particular, screens are used in the activated sludge process to mine and retain specific types of solids, and these retained solids are used to improve process performance. This ability to mine activated sludge through selection and retention of material is a key feature of the embodiments of the invention.
The disclosed embodiments provide a screen to select and retain particles in activated sludge based on particle size or compressibility. The size of the particles retained depends on the size of the screen mesh, in the 10-1000 micron size range. The ability to selectively retain compressible or non-compressible material depends on the washing volume and velocity, and/or the amount of tangential shear applied or force applied perpendicularly. The compressible material tends to pass through the screen as it is washed or sheared. For example, larger sized granules can be retained compared to smaller sized flocs or granules based on mesh size.
An additional feature disclosed herein will retain flocs or granules based on an upper and lower bound screen mesh size. A specific granule/particle size range may be retained by discarding very large granules or trash in a larger mesh size screen following which, very small granules are allowed to pass through in a smaller mesh screen. Thus, a single or multiple screens in series could be used for selective retention and/or pass through of size fractions as desired.
The screens may also be employed for selecting and retaining chemically reactive material used for the mining, treatment or removal of dissolved constituents in wastewater and activated sludge. Finally, the screens can be used for selecting aerobic or anaerobic granular microorganisms. The disclosed embodiments solve various needs for selective retention of portions of activated sludge, as discussed in more detail below.
Selecting Large-Sized Activated Sludge Particles.
Large-sized particles of equal density settle faster than smaller sized particles. A screen may be used to select for larger-sized particles. Increased settling rates is beneficial to treatment plants as this increase can improve capacity utilization of the activated sludge process. Larger aggregates enable organizational structures not present in smaller flocs.
Select and Retain Chemically Reactive Material.
Sometimes, there is a Need to Add chemically reactive material to activated sludge. For example activated carbon, ion exchange resins or metal/non-metal catalysts can be added to sorb, treat, react or mine soluble microconstituents or ions from wastewater or activated sludge. These chemically reactive materials can be added to the activated sludge tanks. The subsequent selective retention and or removal of materials such as activated carbon, catalysts and ion exchange resins can be facilitated using screens.
Select and Retain Biologically Active Material.
Bacteria or other microorganisms can form aerobic or anaerobic granules. These granules can be selected and retained within the activated sludge process by screens. For example, the selection and retention of slow growing autotrophic anaerobic ammonium oxidizers (anammox) granules can be accomplished using screens. Screens can also help develop a selection process for the management of granular or flocculant fractions in an activated sludge tank.
Several types of screens are available for use in the disclosed embodiments including rotary/drum screens, step screens, vibrating screens or stationary screens.
The first aspect disclosed herein provides a screen to retain material based on particle size. Larger size particles settle faster (based on Stokian settling), allowing for the rapid removal of the material in the separation device.
The second aspect disclosed herein provides a means for the selection and retention of biologically inert material that is added to the activated sludge process for the removal of ions or microconstituents. These biologically inert materials may be activated carbon, ion exchange resin, or any other material added to the process for treating or mining. For example, pollutants, such as estrogenic compounds or pharmaceuticals could be selectively removed through the retained activated carbon. Alternatively, ion exchange resins could be used to remove ammonia or phosphorus. Other inert material could be used to improve the physical characteristics of activated sludge (e.g., to improve settleability) and then be selectively retained using screens.
In a third aspect disclosed herein, biological granules can be selected and retained on screens. For example, slow growing granular autotrophic organisms can be retained on screens while faster growing non-autotrophic organisms are allowed to pass through. As a specific example, granular anaerobic ammonium oxidizers (anammox) may be selectively retained onto screens while allowing compressible flocculant organisms to pass through. These enriched and retained organisms can also be bioaugmented to other treatment processes.
The use of the screens of the disclosed embodiments is not intended to retain attached growth like plastic media (as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,458,779 and 7,854,843). The use of screens in the disclosed embodiments is particularly useful to increase and modulate the solids residence time of the mined material that have been selected expressly for providing additional treatment time.
An activated sludge process consists of a bioreactor that is used for the treatment of wastewater, or other liquor such as from internal sidestreams. The bioreactor is connected to a separation device, which may include a clarifier, an upflow granular reactor, a membrane, a filter, a dissolved air floatation device, or any other separation device, for the recycling or removal of biomass. The screens of the disclosed embodiments may be used in such an activated sludge process.
An optional screen wash 5 using gas, liquid or some combination of matter can be added to further assist in the screening process. This screen wash 5 can be directed toward the screen 2 in a variety of different ways, which differently affect the solids retention time, including but not limited to, along the vertical axis (
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/703,844, filed Sep. 21, 2012. The entire disclosure of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/703,844 is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3467699 | Bamforth | Sep 1969 | A |
3747771 | Ruthrof | Jul 1973 | A |
3959124 | Tchobanoglous | May 1976 | A |
4014747 | Kenyon | Mar 1977 | A |
4236999 | Burgess | Dec 1980 | A |
4725364 | Hurley | Feb 1988 | A |
5361909 | Gemmer | Nov 1994 | A |
5397755 | Parker | Mar 1995 | A |
5824222 | Keyser et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5910245 | Bernhardt | Jun 1999 | A |
6569335 | Johnson | May 2003 | B1 |
6814868 | Phagoo et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7070693 | Kelly | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7569147 | Curtis | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7611632 | Wang | Nov 2009 | B1 |
20030006200 | Phagoo et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20070085998 | Brestel | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080314828 | Campbell | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20100006501 | Laurell | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100264082 | Conner | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110017664 | Conner et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110036771 | Woodard | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110186513 | Vuong | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20130069759 | Padgett | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130277302 | Doelle et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140224730 | Conner et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140309607 | Richlen | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2166870 | Jun 1994 | CN |
101300196 | Nov 2008 | CN |
101479200 | Jul 2009 | CN |
102066269 | May 2011 | CN |
102548911 | Jul 2012 | CN |
2000343098 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2003093908 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2005349304 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006035069 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2012106176 | Jun 2012 | JP |
2007076919 | Jul 2007 | KR |
Entry |
---|
Curvers, “Compressibility of biotic sludges—an osmotic approach,” Chem. Eng. J., 166 (2011) p. 678-686. |
Singapore Written Opinion, dated Mar. 24, 2016, pp. 1-5, issued in connection with corresponding Singapore Application 11201502140T. |
Singapore Written Opinion, dated Nov. 15, 2016, pp. 1-4, issued in connection with corresponding Singapore Application 11201502140T. |
Chinese Office action dated Feb. 26, 2016, issued in connection with corresponding Chinese Application 201380049244.2. |
English Translation of the Chinese Office action dated Feb. 26, 2016, issued in connection with corresponding Chinese Application 201380049244.2. |
Japanese Office Action and its English-language translation dated May 9, 2017, issued in connection with corresponding Japanese Application 2015-533255. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140131273 A1 | May 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61703844 | Sep 2012 | US |