The present invention relates to a method and a device for detecting an object able to retroreflect light. Although not exclusively, it is particularly appropriate to the detection of enlarging optics (including the eye) which present retroreflection properties by virtue of the so-called “cat's-eye effect” principle.
It is already known, to detect such an object, to illuminate the latter by a laser signal and form, through a filter tuned to the wavelength of said laser signal, images of the scene in which said object is located, during and between the illuminations of the latter by said laser signal. To do this, it is usual to implement sensors provided with matrix detectors, of CCD type.
Thus, in this known art, the detection of said retroreflecting object is achieved by comparing an image acquired on illumination by the laser signal and an image acquired outside of such illumination, so as to make the background scene disappear and make the laser echo originating from the retroreflection by said object appear.
This known art presents the drawback of generating false alarms originating from variations in the scene between the capturing of the two images, even if the time interval between them is very short. Such variations can be due to movements specific to sensors, to movements of objects in the scene, to a flickering effect from the reflections of the sun, and so on. A fortiori, this prior art cannot be used when there is a major relative movement between the sensor and said object to be detected.
The object of the present invention is to remedy this drawback.
To this end, according to the invention, the method for detecting an object located in a scene, a method whereby:
Thus, according to the invention, pairs of images are obtained from the same scene at the same instant and in two different spectral domains, such that one of the images of a pair (the first) represents said scene and the laser echo on said object, whereas the other image of said pair (the second) represents only said scene without said laser echo. The result is then that the movement effects and flickering effects from the light are the same in the two images of a pair and are eliminated when the difference image is formed.
Thanks to the fact that said second wavelength, although different from said first wavelength, is sufficiently close to the latter for the backscattering of the solar light by said scene to be approximately similar in a first image and in the corresponding simultaneous second image, similar sensitivities are obtained for the first and second images in the sensor used to form them.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a system for detecting an object located in a scene, a system comprising:
Said first and second detection means can be respectively formed by individual CCD detectors or even by parts of a single common CCD detector.
Moreover, said first control means and said second control means can form a control unit common to said first and second detection means.
Advantageously, the system comprises an optical system common to said first and said second detection means.
When said system is intended for the detection of an object able to retroreflect light, it is advantageous for said emitter and said receiver to be close to one another.
The figures of the appended drawing will clearly show how the invention can be implemented. In these figures, identical references denote similar elements.
The detection system 1 represented in
Since the object OP retroreflects light, said laser pulses are retroreflected towards the detection system 1, along a reflected light path 3. The laser pulses duly retroreflected and seen by the receiver R are denoted by the reference lr in timing diagram B of
As diagrammatically shown in
The receiver R also comprises two identical detection devices D1 and D2 in parallel, of CCD type, positioned in the focal plane of the optical system OS and linked with an electronic control and image processing block CT, common to the two devices D1 and D2. The latter can be two individual CCD detectors or even two parts of one and the same CCD detector.
The light path 3 reaches the detection device D1 through a splitter device LD, such as a beam splitter or a splitter cube, and through a filter F1 tuned to the wavelength λ1 of the laser pulses li and lr.
Furthermore, the light path 3 reaches the detection device D2 after reflection on the splitter device LD and on a possible mirror M and having passed through a filter F2 tuned to a wavelength λ2, different from the wavelength λ1.
In a known manner, the detection devices D1 and D2 can comprise a matrix of photosensitive elements positioned in a cooler. The filters F1 and F2 can also be of cooled type and be housed in said cooler.
As illustrated by the timing diagrams C and E of
The reading of the detection devices D1 and D2 by the electronic block CT, after closure of each integration window i1 and i2, makes it possible to obtain images I1 and I2, respectively (see timing diagrams D and F of
It will easily be understood that the images I1 and I2, associated with one and the same retroreflected laser pulse lr, are identical except with respect to the presence of the object OP. In effect, the image I1, produced at the wavelength λ1, comprises not only the scene in which the object OP is located, but also the latter illuminated by the corresponding incident laser pulse li of wavelength λ1. On the other hand, the image I2, produced at the wavelength λ2, cannot have said object OP illuminated at the wavelength λ1, so that the image I2 comprises only the scene in which said object OP is located.
Thus, by subtracting an image I2 from the associated image I1, an image is obtained from which said scene is eliminated, only said illuminated object OP remaining. It is then easy to determine the position of the image of said object OP in the duly obtained difference image and, consequently, the position of said object OP relative to said detection system 1.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
06 10392 | Nov 2006 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2007/001919 | 11/22/2007 | WO | 00 | 5/4/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/071866 | 6/19/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4091412 | Salonimer | May 1978 | A |
5635905 | Blackburn et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5793034 | Wesolowicz et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6392539 | Kanasugi | May 2002 | B1 |
20040208340 | Kirschner | Oct 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
100 35 531 | Feb 2002 | DE |
1 273 928 | Jan 2003 | EP |
9711353 | Mar 1997 | WO |
0039607 | Jul 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100065722 A1 | Mar 2010 | US |