The invention relates to an electronic device that can monitor the fluid levels in a mammal with heart failure or kidney disease, and can support decision making regarding the amount of fluid to be removed from the subject during a hemodialysis session. The systems and methods of the invention include electronic circuits, electronic sensors, a computer processor, algorithm(s) and a telecommunications set-up. The invention further relates to methods for signal processing and patient monitoring.
Functioning kidneys of the mammals remove excess fluids, electrolytes, and other molecules. In patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), kidney function is severely compromised. Chronic kidney disease (CKD), also known as chronic renal disease, is a progressive loss in renal function over a period of months or years. The co-morbidities of CKD are diabetes and high blood pressure, which are indicated to be responsible for up to two-thirds of the cases. Heart disease and the associated cardiac arrhythmias are the leading cause of death for many people suffering from CKD. Excessive fluid, ions and other toxins accumulate in patients with CKD. Although these patients are usually treated by hemodialysis therapy, the treatment is not continuous, but periodic, causing the build-up of excessive amount of fluids in the body between hemodialysis sessions.
Fluid buildup in the body is also a concern for patients with heart failure, a debilitating medical condition in which the ability of the heart muscle to pump the blood is reduced. As the contractions of the heart become weaker and the ability of the heart to push the blood into the arteries is reduced, both the stroke volume and the cardiac output decrease. The volume of blood remaining in the veins increase, causing the fluid to build in the tissues of the subject. The ability of the kidney to excrete excess salts and water is also reduced during the heart failure, further increasing the overall fluid accumulation. Excess fluid can build up in various locations in the body, leading to a general condition known as edema. Edema may cause the swelling that occurs in the feet, ankles and the legs, in which case it is called the peripheral edema. It may also occur in the lungs as with pulmonary edema or in the abdomen as in ascites.
Fluid accumulation in the body causes multiple problems for the patient and the health care system. Peripheral edema causes local pain and discomfort. Pulmonary edema creates breathing difficulties and makes it difficult for the patients to sleep. Ascites increases the external pressure on the vena cava, resulting in the reduced blood return to the heart from the systemic circulation. The increased blood volume elevates the load on the already weakened cardiac muscle, making the heart failure even worse. The increased blood volume also increases the systolic blood pressure which worsens the kidney failure. The stretching of the thin walls of the atria due to the excess blood volume increases the incidence of atrial fibrillation. Given all the negative effects of the volume overload, fluid overload in the patients, especially for ones with kidney or heart disease, must be managed carefully. Otherwise, patients require frequent hospitalizations, which is inconvenient and costly to medical system.
Over the years, many methods have been developed to treat the fluid overload in patients suffering from cardiac and kidney failure. The methods range from pharmaceutical therapies such as the administration of diuretics to increase urine production by the kidneys to the physical methods to directly remove fluids such as ultrafiltration, hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Diuretics increase the urine production by the kidneys to enhance the removal of the fluids using the residual function of the renal system. Although using diuretics reduces the fluid volumes, some patients do not respond to this therapy, either due to the resistance of their body to the drug, or due to the complete failure of their kidneys. Diuretics also contribute to a phenomenon known as the downward spiral in patients with heart failure as illustrated in
Hence, there is a need for methods and systems that overcome the limitations of diuretics. There is also a need for methods and systems to treat the fluid overload in patients suffering from cardiac and kidney failure that overcome limitations associated with pharmaceutical therapies and physical methods to directly remove fluids such as ultrafiltration, hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
The invention is directed to a method for monitoring and treatment of subjects with cardiac disease or kidney disease receiving dialysis treatment. Related medical systems, methods for the build of implantable devices and external monitoring and treatment devices are provided.
In one embodiment, the method can have the steps of obtaining one or more parameters from the patient, communicating the parameters to a medical device processor, wherein the medical device processor utilizes those parameters via a forward algorithm to generate a result, and determining the recommended patient fluid level based on the result.
In another embodiment, the method also can have the step of changing the fluid level in a patient to the recommended fluid level.
In one embodiment, the forward algorithm can compute the recommended change in fluid level in a patient wherein the recommended patient fluid level is based on one or more parameters positively correlated for fluid removal and one or more parameters negatively correlated for fluid removal.
In another embodiment, the one or more parameters positively correlated for fluid removal and the one or more parameters negatively correlated for fluid removal can be multiplied by a weighting coefficient.
In one embodiment, the one or more parameters positively correlated for fluid removal can be a function of an input parameter, an off-set coefficient, and a scaling coefficient, and the one or more parameters negatively correlated for fluid removal can be a function of an input parameter, an off-set coefficient and a scaling coefficient.
In another embodiment, the one or more parameters positively correlated for fluid removal can be selected from the group of atrial fibrillation burden, respiratory rate, sleep pattern, dialysis markers, patient weight, patient medications and dosage, patient supplied data indicative of fluid removal, and clinical data indicative of fluid removal.
In one embodiment, the one or more parameters negatively correlated for fluid removal can be selected from the group of tissue impedance, ambulatory heart rate variability, body temperature, heart rate change during dialysis, heart rate variability during dialysis, blood pressure reduction during dialysis, mixed venous oxygen saturation, and patient medications and dosage indicative of fluid retention.
In another embodiment, the forward algorithm can be computed from a function. In one embodiment, one or more of the parameters can be obtained from the patient prior to dialysis. In another embodiment, one or more of the parameters can be obtained from measurements made during dialysis.
In one embodiment, one or more of the parameters can be obtained from the patient's medical records.
In another embodiment, the parameters can be atrial fibrillation burden, tissue impedance, heart rate variability, sleep pattern and body weight.
In one embodiment, the method can also have the step of utilizing a computer to calculate the recommended fluid level in a patient.
In one embodiment, the method also can have the step of changing the fluid level in a patient to the recommended amount by ultrafiltration.
In one embodiment, the weighting coefficients, off-set coefficients and scaling coefficients can be adjusted during dialysis by using a backward algorithm and patient results.
In one embodiment, the backward algorithm can utilize data from multiple sessions of the patient.
In one embodiment, the parameter positively can be correlated for fluid removal is selected from the group consisting of pulmonary arterial pressure, venous pressure and atrial pressure.
In one embodiment, the forward algorithm can compute the function DFL=W1*D1(P1,Xi)+W2*D2(P2,X2)+W3*D2(P3,X3)+W4*D1(P4,X4)+W5*D1(P5,X5)+W6*D2(P6,X6)+W7*D2(P7,X7)+W8*D2(P8,X8)+W9*D2(P9,X9)+W10*D2(P10,X10)+W12*D1(P12,X12)+W13*D1(P13,X13)+W14*D2(P14,X14)+W15*D1(P15,X15)+W16*D1(P16,X16); where DFL is the recommended change in fluid level in a patient, W1 through W16 are weighting coefficients, X1 through X16 are cut-off triggers, P1 through P16 are input parameters, D1 is a function wherein an output is either 0 and 1 and increases from 0 to 1 as the value of the input parameter increases to a value greater than cut-off trigger, D2 is a function wherein an output is either 0 or 1 and the value decreases from 1 to 0 as the value of an input parameter is greater than the value of the cut-off trigger, wherein parameters associated with D1 correlate to an excess of fluid in the patient when increased and the parameters associated with D2 correlate to an excess of fluid in the patient when decreased.
In one embodiment, the parameters used in the method can be selected from the group comprising atrial fibrillation burden, tissue impedance, ambulatory heart rate variability, respiratory rate, sleep pattern, body temperature, heart rate change during dialysis, heart rate variability during dialysis, blood pressure reduction during dialysis, mixed venous oxygen saturation, fluid removed during dialysis session, dialysis markers, patient weight, patient medications and dosage, patient supplied data, and clinical data.
The invention can be a system for measuring the recommended change in patient fluid level. In one embodiment, the system can be made from one or more sources of parameters from a patient, a medical device processor in electronic communication with the sources of the parameters, wherein the medical device processor utilizes a forward algorithm to calculate a recommended change in patient fluid level.
In another embodiment, the system can be a computer that calculates the recommended change in patient fluid level.
In one embodiment, the forward algorithm can compute the recommended fluid level in a patient wherein the recommended fluid level is based on one or more parameters positively correlated for fluid removal and one or more parameters negatively correlated for fluid level.
In one embodiment, the computer can determine the recommended change in patient fluid level by a forward algorithm given by the function
wherein DFL is the recommended change in fluid level, P1 through Pn are input parameters, Sx is one of the group consisting of S1, S2, and S3, S1 is a function wherein the output is between 0 and 1 and increases as the value of the input parameter increases, S2 is a function wherein the output is between 0 and 1 and the value decreases as the value of the input parameter increases, S3 is a function wherein the output is between 0 and 1 and the value increases as the value of the input parameter varies from a set point, Sx is S1 where the parameter is positively correlated to fluid removal, Sx is S2 where the parameter is negatively correlated to fluid removal, Sx is S3 where the parameter correlates to fluid removal as it deviates from a set point, W1 through Wn are weighting coefficients, C1 through Cn are off-set coefficients, K1 through Kn are scaling coefficients, and n is the number of parameters.
In one embodiment, n can be between 5 and 100.
In one embodiment, the one or more parameters positively correlated for fluid removal can be selected from the group consisting of atrial fibrillation burden, respiratory rate, sleep pattern, dialysis markers, patient weight, patient medications and dosage, patient supplied data indicative of fluid removal and clinical data indicative of fluid removal.
In one embodiment, the one or more parameters can be positively correlated for fluid removal includes pulmonary arterial pressure, venous pressure or atrial pressure.
In one embodiment the one or more parameters negatively correlated for fluid removal can be selected from the group consisting of tissue impedance, ambulatory heart rate variability, body temperature, heart rate change during dialysis, heart rate variability during dialysis, blood pressure reduction during dialysis, mixed venous oxygen saturation, and patient medications and dosage indicative of fluid retention.
In one embodiment, the one or more sources of parameters used in the system can be measurements from an implantable device.
In one embodiment, the one or more sources of parameters used in the system can be manually entered data.
In one embodiment, the one or more sources of the parameters used by the system can be measurements taken from the patient prior to dialysis.
In another embodiment, the system further can be a signaling mechanism to signal when there is a recommended change in the patient's fluid level.
Other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description. The detailed description and specific examples, while indicating some embodiments of the present invention are given by way of illustration and not limitation. Many changes and modifications within the scope of the present invention may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein generally have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the relevant art.
The articles “a” and “an” are used herein to refer to one or to more than one (i.e., to at least one) of the grammatical object of the article. For example, “an element” means one element or more than one element.
The term “backward algorithm,” describes a series of steps or protocols whether computer implemented or not, that can affect one parameters and be correlated back to additional individual parameters.
“Chronic kidney disease” (CKD) is a condition characterized by the slow loss of kidney function. The most common causes of CKD are high blood pressure, diabetes, heart disease, and diseases that cause inflammation in the kidneys. Chronic kidney disease can also be caused by infections or urinary blockages. If CKD progresses, it can lead to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), where the kidneys fail completely.
The terms “communicate” and “communication” include but are not limited to, the connection between the electrical elements of the system, either directly or wirelessly, using optical, electromagnetic, electrical, acoustic or mechanical connections, for data transmission among and between said elements.
The term “comprising” includes, but is not limited to, whatever follows the word “comprising.” Use of the term indicates the listed elements are required or mandatory but that other elements are optional and may or may not be present.
The term “consisting of” includes and is limited to whatever follows the phrase the phrase “consisting of.” The phrase indicates the limited elements are required or mandatory and that no other elements may be present.
A “control system” consists of combinations of components that act together to maintain a system to a desired set of performance specifications. The performance specifications can include sensors and monitoring components, processors, memory and computer components configured to interoperate.
A “controller” or “control unit” is a device which monitors and affects the operational conditions of a system. The operational conditions are typically referred to as output variables of the system, which can be affected by adjusting certain input variables.
“Dialysis” is a type of filtration, or a process of selective diffusion through a membrane. Dialysis removes solutes of a specific range of molecular weights via diffusion through a membrane from a fluid to be dialyzed into a dialysate. During dialysis, a fluid to be dialyzed is passed over a filter membrane, while dialysate is passed over the other side of that membrane. Dissolved solutes are transported across the filter membrane by diffusion between the fluids. The dialysate is used to remove solutes from the fluid to be dialyzed.
An “electrocardiogram” or “ECG” is a time varying waveform, produced by the electrical activity of the cardiac muscle and the associated electrical network within the myocardium. Term is used interchangeably for the ECG tracing available from an external ECG recording, or from an implantable device recording.
The term “forward algorithm” describes an series of step, procedures or protocols whether computer implemented or not, used to convert data from information sources into a value.
“Heart failure” (HF) is a condition characterized by the loss of the pumping function of cardiac muscle. The most common causes of HF are coronary artery disease, high blood pressure, diabetes and obesity. Although it can be managed for extended periods of time, there is no known cure.
A “medical device processor” refers a special purpose processor that can have any one of the following functions of controlling the collection of external or implantable medical device data, controlling the collection of metadata based on the collected data of any type, synchronizing data, and combinations thereof.
A “patient” is a member of any animal species, preferably a mammalian species, optionally a human. The subject can be an apparently healthy individual, an individual suffering from a disease, or an individual being treated for an acute condition or a chronic disease.
The term “parameters positively correlated for fluid removal” are defined as the parameters shown in Table 1 having a “+” sign in the third column and signify an additive effect on an equation. The term “parameters negatively correlated for fluid removal” are defined as the parameters shown in Table 1 having a “−” sign in the third column and signify a subtractive effect on an equation.
The term “processor” as used herein is a broad term and is to be given its ordinary and customary meaning to a person of ordinary skill in the art. The term refers without limitation to a computer system, state machine, processor, or the like designed to perform arithmetic or logic operations using logic circuitry that responds to and processes the basic instructions that drive a computer. In some embodiments, the terms can include ROM (“read-only memory”) and/or RAM (“random-access memory”) associated therewith.
The term “programmable” as used herein refers to a device using computer hardware architecture and being capable of carrying out a set of commands, automatically.
The term “sensory unit” refers to an electronic component capable of measuring a property or condition of interest.
The terms “treating” and “treatment” refer to the management and care of a patient having a pathology or condition. Treating includes administering one or more embodiments of the present invention to prevent or alleviate the symptoms or complications or to eliminate the disease, condition, or disorder. As used herein, “treatment” or “therapy” refers to both therapeutic treatment and prophylactic or preventative measures. “Treating” or “treatment” does not require complete alleviation of signs or symptoms, does not require a cure, and includes protocols having only a marginal or incomplete effect on a patient.
Components of the Invention
The present invention comprises the following components: A set of information sources including the sensors on implantable or external devices to monitor the physiological condition of the patient, a computing unit to process the information, and a communication system to relay the information between the sensors, the processing unit, the patient and the medical care personnel.
Unless specifically stated otherwise, as apparent from the foregoing discussions, it should be appreciated that throughout the specification discussions utilizing terms such as “processing,” “computing,” “calculating,” “determining,” or the like, refer to the action and/or processes of a computer or computing system, or similar electronic computing device, that manipulate and/or transform data represented as physical, such as electronic, quantities within the computing system's registers and/or memories into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within the computing system's memories, registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices. In a similar manner, the term “processor” may refer to any device or portion of a device that processes electronic data from registers and/or memory to transform that electronic data into other electronic data that may be stored in registers and/or memory. A “computing platform” may comprise one or more processors.
Embodiments of the present invention may include apparatuses and/or devices for performing the operations herein. An apparatus may be specially constructed for the desired purposes, or it may comprise a general purpose device selectively activated or reconfigured by a program stored in the device. In yet another exemplary embodiment, the invention may be implemented using a combination of any of, e.g., but not limited to, hardware, firmware, and software, etc.
The methods, software and hardware described herein can be embodied in or use transitory or non-transitory computer readable media with instructions that cause a programmable processor to carry out the techniques described herein. A “computer-readable medium” includes but is not limited to read-only memory, Flash memory, EPROM and a magnetic or optical storage medium. A non-transitory computer readable medium includes all computer readable media except for a transitory, propagating signal.
Information Sources
Sensors used in the present invention provide the sources of data necessary for the processing unit to interpret. As shown in
Category 1 of the Information Source is the data that may be obtained from an implantable device 301. This category includes the atrial fibrillation (AF) burden, tissue impedance, heart rate variability (HRV), respiration, sleep pattern and body temperature. Their relevance and utility in fluid management are described herein. Although these measurements can be obtained by an implantable medical device, external sensors may alternatively be utilized to obtain accurate readings.
AF burden increases as the fluid retention increases since extra fluid in the circulatory system stretches the atria triggering episodes of atrial fibrillation. Hence, an increase in AF burden indicates a need for additional fluid removal. AF burden can be measured by an implantable device monitoring the ECG of the patient. Alternatively, AF burden can be measured using an external device to monitor the ECG of the patient. Normally, AF episodes last less than 5 minutes and occur less than 1% of the time. Longer or more frequent episodes are indicative of a need for additional fluid removal as would be recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art.
Tissue impedance decreases as the fluid retention increases because extra fluid in the body reduces the tissue impedance. Hence, a decrease in the tissue impedance indicates a need for additional fluid removal. Tissue impedance can be measured by an implantable device monitoring the electrical impedance between two electrodes. Tissue impedance that is less than the patient's median tissue impedance measured over time would indicate a need for additional fluid removal. While changes in salt concentration do lower tissue impedance, the majority of impedance change is due to changes in fluid levels.
Heart rate variability decreases as the fluid retention increases since extra fluid in the body increases the heart failure. Hence, a decrease in the heart rate variability indicates a need for additional fluid removal. Heart rate variability can be measured by an implantable device monitoring the ECG of the subject, or alternatively an external device that measures the ECG of the subject. A peak ambulatory HRV of less than 0.15 Hz would be indicative of a need for additional fluid removal.
Respiratory rate increases as the fluid retention increases since extra fluid in the lungs reduces the tidal volume. Hence, an increase in the respiratory rate indicates a need for additional fluid removal. Respiratory rate can be measured by an implantable device monitoring the tissue impedance of the subject. A respiratory rate of more than 15 breaths per minute may be indicative of a need for additional fluid removal.
Sleep pattern is disturbed as the fluid retention increases since extra fluid in the lungs reduces the tidal volume and increases the pulmonary edema. Hence, a disturbance in the sleep pattern indicates a need for additional fluid removal. Sleep patterns can be measured by an implantable device monitoring the physical activity the subject during nocturnal hours. Normally, REM and non-REM sleep alternates every 90 minutes. Higher frequency of these changes can be indicative of a need for increased fluid removal.
The period in which the patient is asleep may be determined in other ways. In other embodiments, a patient programming device may allow the patient to signal to the implantable device that the patient is attempting to sleep. Alternatively, the period during which the patient is asleep may be determined by using an accelerometer in the implantable device. When the accelerometer determines little or no movement for a threshold period of time, it can determine that the patient is asleep. Another embodiment can include determining patient sleep patterns by the changes in heart rate and other known factors indicative of stages of sleep. Alternatively, the implanted device can determine the patient's posture, wherein a patient lying down for a threshold period of time is assumed to be asleep.
Body temperature consistently low can indicate fluid retention. Hence, a persistent drop in the body temperature can indicate a need for additional fluid removal. Body temperature can be measured by an implantable device monitoring the temperature. It can also be monitored by external thermometer. A body temperature below 36 degrees Celsius may be indicative of a need for additional fluid removal.
In some embodiments, the implantable medical devices may be compatible with the processor used to calculate the recommended change in patient fluid level, and may be set to automatically send collected data to the processor wirelessly. In other embodiments, the information may be read by a user, and manually entered into a computer for processing.
Similarly, where measurements are taken by sensors external to the patient, the sensors may automatically input the data into the computer through wired or wireless communication, or the information can be obtained by the user and manually entered.
Category 2 of the Information Source is data obtained during a dialysis session 302. This category includes the heart rate, heart rate variability, blood pressure, mixed venous oxygen saturation, amount of fluid removed, measured blood markers and body weight. Their relevance and utility in fluid management are explained below.
Heart rate is expected to drop during a dialysis session as fluid is removed from the body. An insufficient drop in heart rate during a dialysis session may indicate a need for additional fluid removal. Heart rate can be monitored by an implantable or an external device, such as an ECG monitor, blood pressure monitor or a pulse oximeter during a dialysis session. A heart rate drop of less than five beats per minute may be indicative of a need for additional fluid removal.
As described herein, the heart rate variability (HRV) is a function of the fluid levels. As the fluid is removed from the patient during a dialysis session, one of ordinary skill would expect the HRV to increase. Therefore, an insufficient increase in HRV during a dialysis session may indicate a need for additional fluid removal. HRV can be monitored by an implantable or an external device, such as an ECG monitor, blood pressure monitor, a pulse oximeter during a dialysis session, or other known devices sufficient for the intended purposes known to those of ordinary skill. Heart rate variability during dialysis that is less than 0.15 Hz may be indicative of a need for additional fluid removal.
Blood pressure (BP) can be a function of the fluid levels. As the fluid is removed from the patient during a dialysis session, one of ordinary skill might expect the BP to decrease. Therefore, an insufficient decrease in BP during a dialysis session may indicate a need for additional fluid removal. BP can be monitored by an implantable or an external device during a dialysis session. A decrease in blood pressure of less than 10 mm Hg may be indicative of a need for additional fluid removal.
Another measurement of vascular pressure is the pulmonary arterial, venous (central or peripheral) or atrial pressure obtained from an implanted sensor(s) or derived from a non-implanted external sensor system. An increase in pulmonary artery pressure (diastolic, systolic or mean); central venous pressure or atrial pressure is usually a strong indicator of elevated vascular volume following excess fluid build-up.
A decrease in the mixed venous oxygen saturation may be due to inadequate oxygen delivery, caused by depressed cardiac output resulting from decreased preload, abnormal afterload and cardiac arrhythmias. It could also be due to increased end organ oxygen extraction due to higher metabolic demand, such as sepsis, fever, increased work of breathing and agitation. Hence, a decrease in mixed venous oxygen saturation, absent fever and difficulty of breathing may indicate a need for additional fluid removal. Mixed venous oxygen saturation can be measured by the dialysis system using the blood going into the dialysis system. A mixed venous oxygen saturation of below 68 mm Hg may be indicative of a need for additional fluid removal. Whether or not the patient has a fever may be determined by measuring body temperature through an implantable medical device or external thermometer.
Fluid removed during a dialysis session can be usually predetermined, but may be changed during the session if the patient experiences a hypotensive episode. Hence, the total fluid removed is a parameter to be recorded during the dialysis so it can be adjusted based on the output of the fluid management algorithm 310. This parameter may be automatically entered by the dialysis system into the computer, or alternatively, the user may determine the amount of fluid removed and manually enter it into the computer.
Both the fluid overload and the changes in serum creatinine can be independently correlated with the mortality of the patients. Hence, any increase in creatinine would increase the chances of mortality for the patient, and one can reduce the fluid volumes to compensate for the increased chance of mortality. Therefore, an increase in creatinine may indicate a need for additional fluid removal. Creatinine levels can be obtained from the blood analysis done periodically, such as once a month.
A rapid increase in patient weight can indicate increased fluid retention. Hence a sudden raise in the body weight measurement might necessitate an increase in fluid removal. Weight measurements can be done during dialysis sessions. A change in patient weight of more than 2 kilograms may be indicative of a need for excess fluid removal.
Much of the category 2 information may be obtained from an implantable medical device. In other embodiments, the information may be obtained from external sensors and measurements. In some embodiments, the external sensors can be directly attached to the dialysis apparatus, thus facilitating easy collection of information. In other embodiments, external sensors may be in electronic communication with a computer to automatically add information to the algorithm calculating the recommended change in patient fluid level. In other embodiments, the data obtained from these sensors may be manually added into the computer.
Category 3 of the Information Source 303 can be data entered manually or transferred electronically from other medical information sources, such as an electronic medical record (EMR) system. This category includes the medications taken by the patient, information supplied by the patient and a set of clinical data. Their relevance and utility in fluid management are described herein.
Medications taken can usually change the ability of the patient to excrete urine, hence alters the fluid retention. For example, a patient who can no longer tolerate diuretics will often have their doses of the diuretic reduced, leading to increases in the fluid retention. In such a situation, the fluid removal rate must be increased. Medications taken and their dosage can be manually entered or transferred from the EMR.
Patients themselves can provide information on their health conditions. For example, they may report they are having difficulty in sleeping or running out of breath when climbing stairs, indicating an increase in the fluid retention. In such a situation, the fluid removal rate must be increased. Patient supplied information can be manually entered either by the patient or the medical care personnel.
Clinical information regarding the patient can provide insights into the overall health of the subject. Recent hospitalizations due to pulmonary insufficiency could be due to fluid retention. Blood markers measured at the clinic such BNP can assess the condition of the heart failure, where an increase in BNP values would warrant the removal of additional fluids. Clinical information can be entered manually or transferred from the EMR.
Table 1 provides a summary of the variables, also called “parameters,” as defined herein, their sources and correlations between the parameter and the changes recommended to the amount of fluid to be removed from the patient.
The input parameters including information from category 1, category 2, and category 3, may be communicated to a processor 304 and are shown by 306, 307 and 308 respectively. The processor 304 can operate the algorithm described below 309 to determine a recommended change in fluid level 310, which is then communicated to the system or the user 305.
One embodiment of the system used for determining a recommended change in patient fluid level is shown in
External sensors 405, such as the blood pressure sensor, are placed on the patient 402 for the duration of the dialysis session. Dialysis can be provided with a hemodialysis system 406 connected to the patient 402 via blood lines 407 and 408. Hemodialysis system 406 can be in communication with a computing unit 404, such as a computer. External sensors 405 may also provide the information in category 1 or category 2. The information from the external sensors 405 can be collected by the receiver unit 403 and conveyed to the computing unit 404. Alternatively, the user may directly obtain the information collected by the external sensors and manually enter the information into the computing unit.
Category 3 information may be entered manually by a human 409 or retrieved from the Electronic Medical Records.
Examples of sources of information on the parameters are shown in Table 1. One skilled in the art will understand that these are merely examples of the sources of information and that the data may be obtained from other devices and other sources.
Computing Unit and Algorithm
The processing of the information collected in all three categories is performed by the computing unit. The computing unit can be a specially adapted unit in order to carry out the purposes and steps described herein. In any embodiment, the sensors described herein can operate in combination or conjunction with circuitry specially adapted to the purposes or steps described herein, or in combination or conjunction with more than one such processor, or in combination or conjunction with one or more elements of each type, such as for distinct steps or portions thereof. The computing unit and the sensors which detect the data in each of the categories are specifically adapted computers and processors configured or a medical or healthcare setting. The computers or processors can have shielded circuitry to prevent electric shock to a patient or operator. In any embodiment, the computers and processors of the present invention are not general purpose computers and can have regulatory approval for approved medical use on patients.
An algorithm called the “forward algorithm” is used to convert the data from the information sources into a fluid removal indicator, which will be described herein by Example 1.
Initially, a set of scores can be calculated from the sensory information, using one of the six functions listed in Table 2. A graphical representation of the same six functions is shown in
Functions D1 and S1, shown graphically in
Below is an example illustrating using the parameters and their conversion into raw scores. In this example, features P1 through P16 are as they were described in Table 1.
DFL=W1*S1(P1,C1,K1)+W2*S2(P2,C2,K2)+W3*S2(P3,C3,K3)+W4*S1(P4,C4,K4)+W5*S1(P5,C5,K5)+W6*S2(P6,C6,K6)+W7*S2(P7,C7,K7)+W8*S2(P8,C8,K8)+W9*S2(P9,C9,K9)+W10*S2(P10,C10,K10)+W12*S1(P12,C12,K12)+W13*S1(P13,C13,K13)+W14*S2(P14,C14,K14)+W15*S1(P15,C15,K15)+W16*S1(P16,C16,K16)
where the DLF is the recommended change for fluid removal; W1, W2, . . . , W16 are the weighting coefficients; S1 and S2 are the functions are as defined in Table 2; P1, P2, . . . , P16 are as defined in Table 1; C1, C2, . . . , C16 are off-set coefficients, and K1, K2, . . . , K16 are scaling coefficients.
In certain embodiments, the above computation can be called one form of a forward algorithm using information from Categories 1, 2 and 3, and producing the recommended change in the fluid removal. The offset coefficients can be determined and set so that the coefficients will equal the measured parameter when the parameter indicates no recommended change in fluid level. For example, if a patient's respiratory rate is 17 bpm in the absence of an excess of fluid, then the offset coefficient may be set at 17 bpm. The weighting coefficients can be set to give more weight to the parameters that are more indicative of a need to change the patient's fluid level, and to convert the numerical result of the function into a recommended change in patient fluid level in volume. If it is found in a particular patient that a particular parameter is not changing with a reduction in fluid level, and is found not to correlate to the patient outcome, then the weighting coefficient can be reduced to 0. This would eliminate that parameter from the algorithm. The scaling coefficients are set to determine the slope of the function. If a small change in the input parameter is highly indicative of a need to change patient fluid level, the slope of the function should be steep. If slight deviations in the input parameter are not highly indicative of a need to change patient fluid level, the slope of the function should be shallow.
For the calculation of the recommended change, weighting coefficients and the off-set and scaling coefficients can be determined. The constants as described herein are collectively denoted with the symbol M. These constants can be predetermined and adjusted by medical professionals attending the patient. Alternatively, the computing unit may adjust these constants based on the patient outcomes, using a backward algorithm. By utilizing the backward algorithm, the effect of changing patient fluid level can be correlated back to the individual parameters. From this, the proper weighting and scaling coefficients may be determined.
Table 3 provides nominal values for each of the 13 measured parameters listed. These values may be set as the offset coefficients in the initial determination of the constants M. Deviations from these values may be indicative of a need to change the patient's fluid level. In one embodiments, a computer can calculate the constants using the backward algorithm wherein the constants may be updated and/or changed. Additionally, the patient's medical history may show reasons for other than excess fluid that can cause a deviation from these values. When initially setting the constants for the patient's initial dialysis, the offset coefficients may be changed to reflect the deviations.
In certain embodiments, a computing unit can work to identify the constants M using the backward algorithm wherein the operation if the unit in the overall system is shown in
In certain embodiments, for the initial use by each patient, the weighting, off-set and scaling coefficients can be derived and added to the system. These coefficients can be estimated by the user, or they may be based upon values that are found suitable for similar patients. Once dialysis begins, the forward algorithm will determine a recommended change in patient fluid level. At the same time, the patient outcome can be monitored using the backward algorithm, which will make changes to the coefficients.
The technical benefit of the adjustments to the coefficients by the backward algorithm and the adjustments to the recommended fluid level of the patient is a dynamic process that cannot be accomplished with pen and paper. The changes to the coefficients and therefore the changes to the recommended fluid level occur constantly in order to continuously update the recommended fluid level. These changes occur too quickly for the calculations to be performed with the use of pen and paper.
The processors described herein can be medical device processors. Medical device processors can control the collection of external or implantable medical device data, control the collection of metadata based on the collected data, and synchronize the data on a timeline. The computing unit and the sensors which detect the data in each of the categories are specific purpose computers and processors configured or a medical or healthcare setting. The computers or processors can have shielded circuitry to prevent electric shock to a patient or operator. In any embodiment, the computers and processors of the present invention are not general purpose computers and can have regulatory approval for approved medical use on patients. The processors also have communication systems, hardware and software that protect patient privacy by protecting the information obtained from the patient.
The systems described herein can also obtain historical data from electronic medical records or other sources. The hardware configurations of the system allow for transmission of the data obtained to the patient's electronic medical records, or to a hospital data hub, handheld device, or monitor. The computers or processors described herein are specially adapted to receive patient data from the sensors and immediately perform the necessary calculations to determine a new recommended fluid level.
One of ordinary skill in the art will realize that not all sixteen parameters are necessary in order to obtain a recommended change in patient fluid level. Each of the parameters individually tend to show whether a change in fluid level is necessary and by how much. Therefore, an accurate measurement of the recommended change in patient fluid level may be achieved using significantly less than all of the parameters. Additionally, other parameters may be found that also tend to show a need to change the patient's fluid level. One of ordinary skill in the art will realize that additional parameters may be utilized without exceeding the scope of the invention.
The recommended change in fluid level when the number of parameters used is not 16 would be given by the equation:
Where DFL is the recommended change in fluid level; W1 . . . Wn are the weighting coefficients; P1. Pn are the parameters as defined in Table 1; C1 . . . Cn are off-set coefficients; K1 . . . Kn are scaling coefficients; and Sx is the appropriate function as defined in Table 2 for the given parameter Px. If the value of the given parameter is positively correlated to a need to change the patient fluid level, function S1 would be used. If the value of a given parameter is negatively correlated with a need to change patient fluid level, then S2 is the appropriate function. If deviations in the parameter in either direction from some off-set point indicate a need to change patient fluid level, then S3 is the appropriate function. For example, a system can be set up where the parameters utilized are AF burden, tissue impedance, heart rate variability, sleep pattern and body weight. The off-set coefficients would be set in the ranges shown in Table 3. Initially, the weighting coefficients and scaling coefficients would need to be estimated, but as the patient undergoes treatment, the backward algorithm will adjust these coefficients. Because there is no gray scale when using the discrete functions D1, D2 and D3, the only variable is the cut-off trigger Xc. For using the discrete functions D1, D2, and D3, the off-set coefficients should be chosen at some point beyond the normal value. This allows slight variations in the measured parameters before the function switches from giving a value of 0 to giving a value of 1. For example, if the patient's respiratory rate is 13 bpm in the absence of fluid accumulation, then the cut-off trigger could be set at 17 bpm, which allows some variation in respiratory rate without changing the result of the function.
In some embodiments of the invention, a communication system can be used. The communication system allows transferring data, including the information in the category 3 information source, recommended ultrafiltration amounts, and the coefficients M.
It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various combinations and/or modifications and variations can be made in the dialysis system depending upon the specific needs for operation. Moreover, features illustrated or described as being part of one embodiment may be used on another embodiment to yield a still further embodiment.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/539,437 filed Nov. 12, 2014, which claims benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/899,875 filed Nov. 4, 2013, and the disclosures of each of the above-identified applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2002 | Rider | Mar 1841 | A |
3602222 | Herndon | Aug 1971 | A |
3608729 | Haselden | Sep 1971 | A |
3669878 | Marantz | Jun 1972 | A |
3669880 | Marantz | Jun 1972 | A |
3730183 | Goldsmith | May 1973 | A |
3754867 | Guenther | Aug 1973 | A |
3850835 | Marantz | Nov 1974 | A |
3884808 | Scott | May 1975 | A |
3989622 | Marantz | Nov 1976 | A |
4060485 | Eaton | Nov 1977 | A |
4371385 | Johnson | Feb 1983 | A |
4374382 | Markowitz | Feb 1983 | A |
4381999 | Boucher | May 1983 | A |
4460555 | Thompson | Jul 1984 | A |
4556063 | Thompson | Dec 1985 | A |
4562751 | Nason | Jan 1986 | A |
4581141 | Ash | Apr 1986 | A |
4650587 | Polak | Mar 1987 | A |
4661246 | Ash | Apr 1987 | A |
4678408 | Mason | Jul 1987 | A |
4685903 | Cable | Aug 1987 | A |
4747822 | Peabody | May 1988 | A |
4750494 | King | Jun 1988 | A |
4772560 | Attar | Sep 1988 | A |
4799493 | DuFault | Jan 1989 | A |
4826663 | Alberti | May 1989 | A |
4828693 | Lindsay | May 1989 | A |
5032265 | Jha | Jul 1991 | A |
5080653 | Voss | Jan 1992 | A |
5091642 | Chow | Feb 1992 | A |
5092886 | Dobos-Hardy | Mar 1992 | A |
5097122 | Coiman | Mar 1992 | A |
5127404 | Wybomy | Jul 1992 | A |
5141493 | Jacobsen | Aug 1992 | A |
5284470 | Beltz | Feb 1994 | A |
5302288 | Meidl | Apr 1994 | A |
5305745 | Zacouto | Apr 1994 | A |
5318750 | Lascombes | Jun 1994 | A |
5468388 | Goddard | Nov 1995 | A |
5507723 | Keshaviah | Apr 1996 | A |
5643201 | Peabody | Jul 1997 | A |
5651893 | Kenley | Jul 1997 | A |
5683432 | Goedeke | Nov 1997 | A |
5744031 | Bene | Apr 1998 | A |
5762782 | Kenley | Jun 1998 | A |
5819007 | Elghazzawi | Oct 1998 | A |
5902336 | Mishkin | May 1999 | A |
5944884 | Roberts | Aug 1999 | A |
5987352 | Klein | Nov 1999 | A |
6048732 | Anslyn | Apr 2000 | A |
6052822 | Holmstrom | Apr 2000 | A |
6058331 | King | May 2000 | A |
6156002 | Polaschegg | Dec 2000 | A |
6230059 | Duffin | May 2001 | B1 |
6248093 | Moberg | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254567 | Treu | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6321101 | Holmstrom | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6362591 | Moberg | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363279 | Ben-Haim | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6505075 | Weiner | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6554796 | Mann | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6555986 | Moberg | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6589229 | Connelly | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6602399 | Fromherz | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609023 | Fischell | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6627164 | Wong | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6645191 | Knerr | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6676608 | Keren | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6689083 | Gelfand | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6706007 | Gelfand | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6711439 | Bradley | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6726647 | Sternby | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6780322 | Bissler | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6818196 | Wong | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6878283 | Thompson | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6887214 | Levin | May 2005 | B1 |
6890315 | Levin | May 2005 | B1 |
6960179 | Gura | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7074332 | Summerton | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7077819 | Goldau | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7131956 | Pirazzoli | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7175809 | Gelfand | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7208092 | Micheli | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7276042 | Polaschegg | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7399289 | Gelfand | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7404799 | Koh | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7500958 | Asbrink | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7566432 | Wong | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7575564 | Childers | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7610086 | Ke | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7674231 | McCombie | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7704361 | Garde | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7736507 | Wong | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7744553 | Kelly | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7754852 | Burnett | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7756572 | Fard | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7775983 | Zhang | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7775986 | Roeher | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7776210 | Rosenbaum | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785463 | Bissler | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7794141 | Perry | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7850635 | Polaschegg | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7857976 | Bissler | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7867214 | Childers | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7896831 | Sternby | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7922686 | Childers | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7922911 | Micheli | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7947179 | Rosenbaum | May 2011 | B2 |
7955291 | Sternby | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7967022 | Grant | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7981082 | Wang | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8000000 | Greenberg | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8034161 | Gura | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8070709 | Childers | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8098969 | Roberts | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8105260 | Tonelli | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8183046 | Lu | May 2012 | B2 |
8187250 | Roberts | May 2012 | B2 |
8197439 | Wang | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8202241 | Karakama | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8246826 | Wilt | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8273049 | Demers | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8282828 | Wallenas | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8292594 | Tracey | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8313642 | Yu | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8317492 | Demers | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8357113 | Childers | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366316 | Kamen | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8366655 | Kamen | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8404091 | Ding | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8409441 | Wilt | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8496809 | Roger | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8499780 | Wilt | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8500676 | Jansson | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8512271 | Moissl | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8518260 | Raimann | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8521482 | Akonur | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8535525 | Heyes | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8560510 | Brueggerhoff | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8580112 | Updyke | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8597227 | Childers | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8696626 | Kirsch | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8903492 | Soykan | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8926542 | Gerber | Jan 2015 | B2 |
20020016550 | Sweeney | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020042561 | Schulman | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020112609 | Wong | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030028089 | Galley | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030069481 | Hervy | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030080059 | Peterson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097086 | Gura | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105435 | Taylor | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030113931 | Pan | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030114787 | Gura | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030187479 | TranThong | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040019312 | Childers | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040060865 | Callan | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040068219 | Summerton | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040099593 | DePaolis | May 2004 | A1 |
20040147900 | Polaschegg | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040168969 | Sternby | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040215090 | Erkkila | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050065760 | Murtfeldt | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050113796 | Taylor | May 2005 | A1 |
20050126961 | Bissler | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131331 | Kelly | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050126998 | Childers | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050150832 | Tsukamoto | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050214863 | McDevitt | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050234354 | Rowlandson | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234357 | Xue | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234381 | Niemetz | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234534 | Rowlandson | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050236330 | Nier | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050265895 | Kopelman | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050274658 | Rosenbaum | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060025661 | Sweeney | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060025748 | Ye | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060217771 | Soykan | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058731 | Burnett | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060191850 | Bosetto | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195064 | Plahey | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060226079 | Mori | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241709 | Soykan | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247548 | Sarkar | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060264894 | Moberg | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070007208 | Brugger | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070038138 | Gill | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070066928 | Lannoy | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073168 | Zhang | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070138011 | Hofmann | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070161113 | Ash | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070175827 | Wariar | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070179431 | Roberts | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213653 | Childers | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070215545 | Bissler | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070255250 | Moberg | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276270 | Tran | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080006570 | Gura | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021337 | Li | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080053905 | Brugger | Mar 2008 | A9 |
20080067132 | Ross | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080093276 | Roger | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080200866 | Prisco | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215247 | Tonelli | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080253427 | Kamen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090020471 | Tsukamoto | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090036825 | Petersen | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090101577 | Fulkerson | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090124869 | Hu | May 2009 | A1 |
20090124963 | Hogard | May 2009 | A1 |
20090127193 | Updyke | May 2009 | A1 |
20090171261 | Sternby | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090264776 | Vardy | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090275849 | Stewart | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090275883 | Chapman | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090281484 | Childers | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090282980 | Gura | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090314063 | Sternby | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100004588 | Yeh | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100010429 | Childers | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100042035 | Moissl | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100076398 | Scheurer | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100078381 | Merchant | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100078387 | Wong | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100084330 | Wong | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100087771 | Karakama | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094158 | Solem | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100113891 | Barrett | May 2010 | A1 |
20100114012 | Sandford | May 2010 | A1 |
20100137693 | Porras | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100137782 | Jansson | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100168546 | Kamath | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100217180 | Akonur | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217181 | Roberts | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100224492 | Ding | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234795 | Wallenas | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241045 | Kelly | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100264086 | Noack | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100312172 | Hoffman | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110017665 | Updyke | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110048949 | Ding et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066006 | Banet | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066043 | Banet | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071465 | Wang | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110077574 | Sigg | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110077575 | Kraemer | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110079558 | Raimann | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110081728 | Putnam | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110087187 | Beck | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110100909 | Stange | May 2011 | A1 |
20110106003 | Childers | May 2011 | A1 |
20110130666 | Dong | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110137136 | Kotanko | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110141116 | Dalesch | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110144570 | Childers | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110184340 | Tan | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110208105 | Brandl | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110272337 | Palmer | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110301447 | Park | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110301472 | Grober | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120016228 | Kroh | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120083729 | Childers | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120085707 | Beiriger | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120115248 | Ansyln | May 2012 | A1 |
20120135396 | McDevitt | May 2012 | A1 |
20120181230 | Kloeffel | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120220528 | VanAntwerp | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120258546 | Marran | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120259276 | Childers | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120273354 | Orhan et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120273415 | Gerber | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120273420 | Gerber | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120277546 | Soykan | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120277551 | Gerber | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120277552 | Gerber | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120277604 | Gerber | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120277650 | Gerber | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120277655 | Gerber | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120277722 | Gerber | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120283581 | Olde et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120303079 | Mahajan | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130037465 | Heyes | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130062265 | Balschat | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130116578 | QiAn | May 2013 | A1 |
20130168316 | Noguchi | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130193073 | Hogard | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130199998 | Kelly | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130211730 | Wolff | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130213890 | Kelly | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130228517 | Roger | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130231607 | Roger | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130248426 | Pouchoulin | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130274642 | Soykan | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130324915 | (Krensky)Britton | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130330208 | Ly | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130331774 | Farrell | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140018727 | Burbank | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140018728 | Plahey | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140042092 | Akonur | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140065950 | Mendelsohn | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140088442 | Soykan | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140110340 | White | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140110341 | White | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140158538 | Collier | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140158588 | Pudil | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140158623 | Pudil | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140190876 | Meyer | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140216250 | Meyer | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140217028 | Pudil | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140217029 | Meyer | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140217030 | Meyer | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140220699 | Pudil | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140314625 | Clift | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150032023 | Soykan | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150080682 | Gerber | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088047 | Gerber | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150144539 | Pudil | May 2015 | A1 |
20150148697 | Burnes | May 2015 | A1 |
20150149096 | Soykan | May 2015 | A1 |
20150250427 | Soykan | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150352269 | Gerber | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150367054 | Gerber | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160023467 | Din et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160206801 | Gerber | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160331884 | Sigg | Nov 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101193667 | Jun 2008 | CN |
103037917 | Apr 2013 | CN |
3224823 | Jan 1984 | DE |
266795 | Nov 1987 | EP |
0272414 | Oct 1991 | EP |
0330892 | Jul 1994 | EP |
1124599 | May 2000 | EP |
1175238 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1281351 | Feb 2003 | EP |
2308526 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1364666 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1523347 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1523350 | Jan 2004 | EP |
0906768 | Feb 2004 | EP |
1691863 | Apr 2005 | EP |
2116269 | Feb 2008 | EP |
1450879 | Oct 2008 | EP |
1514562 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2219703 | May 2009 | EP |
1592494 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2100553 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2398529 | Nov 2010 | EP |
2575827 | Dec 2010 | EP |
2100553 | Aug 2011 | EP |
2576453 | Dec 2011 | EP |
2701580 | Nov 2012 | EP |
2701595 | Nov 2012 | EP |
1345856 | Mar 2013 | EP |
2344220 | Apr 2013 | EP |
1351756 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2190498 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2701596 | Mar 2014 | EP |
1582226 | Jan 2016 | EP |
S551980138462 | Oct 1980 | JP |
S63-143077 | Nov 1987 | JP |
2002533170 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2002542900 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003235965 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2005-533573 | Nov 2005 | JP |
5099464 | Oct 2012 | JP |
1995003839 | Feb 1995 | WO |
WO 1998054563 | Dec 1998 | WO |
9937342 | Jul 1999 | WO |
0057935 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO2000057935 | Oct 2000 | WO |
200066197 | Nov 2000 | WO |
2000066197 | Nov 2000 | WO |
200170307 | Sep 2001 | WO |
2001085295 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0185295 | Nov 2001 | WO |
1085295 | Nov 2001 | WO |
2002013691 | Feb 2002 | WO |
2003043677 | May 2003 | WO |
2003043680 | May 2003 | WO |
2003051422 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2004008826 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004009156 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004009158 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004030716 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004030717 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004064616 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2005033701 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005061026 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2005123230 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006011009 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006017446 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2007038347 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007089855 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2008037410 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2009026603 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009024566 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2009026603 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2009061608 | May 2009 | WO |
2009094184 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009157877 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2009157878 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010024963 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010028860 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010028860 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010033314 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010033699 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010077851 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2010096659 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2010121820 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2011025705 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011026645 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011137693 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO2011161056 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2012042323 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2012050781 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2012051996 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2012073420 | Jul 2012 | WO |
2012148781 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2012148786 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2012148787 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2012148789 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2012162515 | Nov 2012 | WO |
20120277551 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO2012148788 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO 20120148784 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2012148784 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2012172398 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2013019179 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013019994 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013025844 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013028809 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013101292 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2013103607 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2013103906 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2013110906 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013110919 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013114063 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013121162 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013140346 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2013141896 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2013101292 | Oct 2013 | WO |
14066254 | May 2014 | WO |
14066255 | May 2014 | WO |
14077082 | May 2014 | WO |
2014121162 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2014121163 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2014121167 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2014121169 | Aug 2014 | WO |
WO 20140121161 | Aug 2014 | WO |
WO2015081221 | Jun 2015 | WO |
WO 20150159280 | Oct 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
[NPL376] Gambro AK 96 Dialysis Machine Operators Manual, Dec. 2012. p. 1-140. |
[NPL376] Gambro AK 96 Dialysis Machine Operators Manual, Dec. 2012. p. 141-280. |
[NPL376] Gambro AK 96 Dialysis Machine Operators Manual, Dec. 2012. p. 281-420. |
[NPL376] Gambro AK 96 Dialysis Machine Operators Manual, Dec. 2012. p. 421-534. |
[NPL325] Albert, Fluid Management Strategies in Heart Failure, Critical Care Nurse, 32:20-32, 2012. |
[NPL326] PCT/US2014/065201 International Search Report dated May 26, 2015. |
[NPL328] Genovesi, et al., Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2009; 24(8):2529-2536. |
[NPL32] Secemsky, et. al, High prevalence of cardiac autonomic dysfunction and T-wave alternans in dialysis patients. Heart Rhythm, Apr. 2011, 592-598 : vol. 8, No. 4. |
[NPL339] U.S. Appl. 13/424,517 IDS, filed Aug. 2, 2012. |
[NPL340] U.S. Appl. 13/424,517, IDS filed Dec. 2, 2013. |
[NPL35] Wei, et. al., Fullerene-cryptand coated piezoelectric crystal urea sensor based on urease, Analytica Chimica Acta, 2001,77-85:437. |
[NPL37] US NonProvisional Application, U.S. Appl. No. 13/368,225 dated Feb. 7, 2012. |
[NPL383] Leifer et al., A Study on the Temperature Variation of Rise Velocity for Large Clean Bubbles, J. Atmospheric & Oceanic Tech., vol. 17, pp. 1392-1402, Oct. 2000. |
[NPL384] Talaia, Terminal Velocity of a Bubble Rise in a Liquid Column, World Acad. of Sci., Engineering & Tech., vol. 28, pp. 264-268, Published Jan. 1, 2007. |
[NPL386] The FHN Trial Group. In-Center. Hemodialysis Six Times per Week versus Three Times per Week, New England Journal of Medicine, 2010 Abstract. |
[NPL39] PCT/US2012/034332, International Search Report, dated Jul. 5, 2012. |
[NPL46] Siegenthaler, et al., Pulmonary fluid status monitoring with intrathoracic impedance, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 24:449-451, published Jan. 12, 2011. |
[NPL477] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,792 dated Apr. 6, 2015. |
[NPL47] U.S. Appl. No. 61/480,544. |
[NPL483] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,525 dated Aug. 11, 2015. |
[NPL486] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,525 dated Oct. 20, 2016. |
[NPL494] John Wm Agar: Review: Understanding sorbent dialysis systems, Nephrology, vol. 15, No. 4, Jun. 1, 2010, pp. 406-411. |
[NPL495] European Office Action in Application 12717020.7 dated Sep. 14, 2016. |
[NPL500] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/554,272 dated Aug. 8, 2016. |
[NPL501] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,467 dated Oct. 16, 2013. |
[NPL502] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,467 dated Mar. 3, 2014. |
[NPL503] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,490 dated Oct. 22, 2013. |
[NPL504] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,490 dated Mar. 10, 2014. |
[NPL505] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,490 dated Jul. 14, 2014. |
[NPL506] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,490 dated Dec. 5, 2014. |
[NPL507] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,525 dated Sep. 29, 2014. |
[NPL508] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,525 dated May 6, 2015. |
[NPL509] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,454 dated Oct. 17, 2013. |
[NPL510] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,454 dated Mar. 10, 2014. |
[NPL511] Office action in U.S. Appl. 13/424,429 dated Oct. 15, 2015. |
[NPL512] Office Action in U.S. Appl. 12/571,127 dated Feb. 27, 2014. |
[NPL513] Office Action in U.S. Appl. 12/571,127 dated Jul. 6, 2015. |
[NPL514] Office Action in U.S. Appl. 12/571,127 dated Dec. 17, 2015. |
[NPL521] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/554,338 dated Jun. 7, 2016. |
[NPL522] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/554,338 dated Sep. 28, 2016. |
[NPL524] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,429 dated Oct. 15, 2015. |
[NPL525] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/571,127 dated Feb. 27, 2014. |
[NPL526] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/571,127 dated Jul. 6, 2015. |
[NPL105] Brynda, et. al., The detection of toman 2-microglcbuiin by grating coupler immunosensor with three dimensional antibody networks. Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 1999, 363-368, 14(4). |
[NPL10] Wheaton, et al., Dowex Ion Exchange Resins—Fundamentals of Ion Exchange; Jun. 2000, pp. 1-9. http://www.dow.com/scripts/litorder.asp?filepath=liguidseps/pdfs/noreg/177-01837.pdf. |
[NPL111] Zhong, et. al., Miniature urea sensor based on H(+)-ion sensitive field effect transistor and its application in clinical analysis, Chin. J. Biotechnol., 1992, 57-65. 8(1). |
[NPL119] PCT/US2012/034331, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 9, 2012. |
[NPL121] Roberts M, The regenerative dialysis (REDY) sorbent system. Nephrology, 1998, 275-278:4. |
[NPL138] U.S. Appl. No. 61/480,544. |
[NPL139] U.S. Appl. No. 61/480,541 dated Apr. 29, 2011. |
[NPL142] Hemametrics, Crit-Line Hematocrit Accuracy, 2003, 1-5, vol. 1, Tech Note No. 11 (Rev. D). |
[NPL144] Weissman, S., et al., Hydroxyurea-induced hepatitis in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients. Clin. Infec. Dis, (Jul. 29, 1999): 223-224. |
[NPL146] PCT/US2012/034334, International Search Report, dated Jul. 6, 2012. |
[NPL147] PCT/US2012/034335, International Search Report, dated Sep. 5, 2012. |
[NPL148] PCT/US/2012/034327, International Search Report, dated Aug. 13, 2013. |
[NPL149] PCT/US/2012/034329, International Search Report, dated Dec. 3, 2012. |
[NPL14] Foley, et al., Long Interdialytic Interval and Martality among Patients Receiving Hemodialysis, N Engl Jrnl Med. 2011:365(12):1099-1107. |
[NPL15] PCT International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US2014/067650, dated Nov. 27, 2013. |
[NPL169] Wang, Fundamentals of intrathoracic impedance monitoring in heart failure, Am. J. Cardiology, 2007, 3G-10G: Suppl. |
[NPL16] PCT/US2014/067650 International Search Report Written Opinion dated Mar. 9, 2015. |
[NPL170] Bleyer, et al, Kidney International. Jun. 2006; 69(12):2268-2273. |
[NPL176] Bleyer, et. al., Sudden and cardiac death rated in hemodialysis patients, Kidney International. 1999, 1553-1559: 55. |
[NPL180] PCT/US2012/034335, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Nov. 7, 2013. |
[NPL181] PCT/US2012/034303, Internationa Search Report, dated Jul. 6, 2013. |
[NPL186] PCT/US2012/034332, Internatonal Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Oct. 29, 2013. |
[NPL187] PCT/US2012/034333, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Oct. 29, 2013. |
[NPL188] PCT/US2012/034333, International Search Report, dated Aug. 29, 2012. |
[NPL188] PCT/US2012/034333, International Search Report, dated Aug. 29, 2013. |
European Office Action for App. No. 14859115.9, dated Mar. 25, 2020. |
[NPL195] PCT/US2012/034327, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Oct. 29, 2013. |
[NPL197] PCT/US2012/034330, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Oct. 29, 2013. |
[NPL205] Culleton, BF et al. Effect of Frequent Nocturnal Hemodialysis vs. Conventional Hemodialysis on Left Ventricular Mass and Quality of Life. 2007 Journal of the American Medical Association 298 (11), 1291-1299. |
[NPL217] U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,722, filed Feb. 1, 2013. |
[NPL218] U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,794, filed Feb. 2, 2012. |
[NPL219] U.S. Appl. No. 13/791,755, filed Mar. 8, 2013. |
[NPL21] U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,479 dated Nov. 1, 2012. |
[NPL220] U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,792, filed Feb. 2, 2013. |
[NPL222] U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,794, filed Feb. 2, 2013. |
[NPL227] U.S. Appl. No. 13/837,287, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
[NPL22] U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,429 dated Nov. 1, 2012. |
[NPL230] Redfield, et. al, Restoration of renal response to atria! natriuretic factor in experimental low-output heat failure, Am. J. Physiol., Oct. 1, 1989, R917-923:257. |
[NPL231] Rogoza, et. al., Validation of A&D UA-767 device for the self-measurement of blood pressure, Blood Pressure Monitoring, 2000, 227-231, 5(4). |
[NPL233] PCT/US2012/034329, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Oct. 29, 2013. |
[NPL234] Lima, et. al., An electrochemical sensor based on nanostructure hollsndite-type manganese oxide for detection of potassium ion, Sensors, Aug. 24, 2009, 6613-8625, 9. |
[NPL235] MacLean, et, al., Effects of hindlimb contraction on pressor and muscle interstitial metabolite responses in the cat, J. App. Physiol., 1998, 1583-1592, 85(4). |
[NPL237] U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,693, dated Feb. 1, 2013. |
[NPL238] PCT Application, PCT/US20013/020404, filed Jan. 4, 2013. |
[NPL23] U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,525. |
[NPL240] US Application, U.S. Appl. No. 13/836,973, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
[NPL241] US Application, U.S. Appl. No. 14/259,655, filed Apr. 23, 2014. |
[NPL242] US Application, U.S. Appl. No. 14/259,589, filed Apr. 23, 2014. |
[NPL264] PCT/US2014/014357 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 19, 2014. |
[NPL268] Ronco et al. 2008, Cardiorenal Syndrome, Journal American College Cardiology, 52:1527-1539, Abstract. |
[NPL26] Overgaard, et. al., Activity-induced recovery of excitability in K+-depressed rat soleus muscle, Am. J. P 280: R48-R55, Jan. 1, 2001. |
[NPL27] Overgaard. et. al., Relations between excitability and contractility in rate soleusmuscle: role of the Na+—K+ pump and Na+—K—S gradients. Journal of Physiology, 1999, 215-225, 518(1). |
[NPL285] Zoccali, Pulmonary Congestion Predicts Cardiac Events and Mortality in ESRD, Clinical Epidemiology, J. Am Soc Nephrol 24:639-646, 2013. |
[NPL306] Coast, et al. 1990, An approach to Cardiac Arrhythmia analysis Using Hidden Markov Models, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 1990, 37(9):826-835. |
[NPL309] Weiner, et. al., Article: Cardiac Function and Cardiovascular Disease in Chronic Kidney Disease, Book: Primer on Kidney Diseases (Author: Greenberg, et al), 2009,499-505, 5th Ed., Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA. |
[NPL310] U.S. Appl. No. 61/480,532. |
[NPL311] U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,479. |
[NPL312] U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,429 dated Nov. 1, 2012. |
[NPL313] U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,525. |
[NPL317] U.S. Appl. No. 61/480,530. |
[NPL318] U.S. Appl. No. 61/480,528 dated Apr. 29, 2011. |
[NPL322] Velasco, Optimal Fluid Control can Normalize Cardiovascular Risk Markers and Limit Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Thrice Weekly Dialysis Patients, Hemodialysis Intenational, 16:465-472, 2012. |
[NPL323] Whitman, CKD and Sudden Cardiac Death: Epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Approaches, J Am Soc Nephrol, 23:1929-1939, 2012. |
[NPL324] Hall, Hospitalization for Congestive Heart Failure: United States, 2000-2010, NCHS Data Brief, No. 108, Oct. 2012. |
[NPL527] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/571,127 dated Dec. 17, 2015. |
[NPL539] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/571,127 dated Nov. 8, 2012. |
[NPL540] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/554,338 dated Jun. 7, 2016. |
[NPL541] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/554,338 dated Sep. 28, 2016. |
[NPL542] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/554,272 dated Aug. 8, 2016. |
[NPL543] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,479 dated Oct. 25, 2014. |
[NPL545] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/566,686 dated Apr. 28, 2016. |
[NPL547] Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201510511657.9 dated Dec. 28, 2016. |
[NPL55] U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,454. |
[NPL57] U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,467. |
[NPL582] Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,792 dated Apr. 6, 2015. |
[NPL62] U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,533. |
[NPL632] Lakerveld et al, Primary prevention of diabetes mellitus type 2 and cardiovascular diseases using a cognitive behavior program aimed at lifestyle changes in people at risk: Design of a randomized controlled trial, 2008, BMC Endocrine Disorders, 8(6): 1-19. |
[NPL633] Gordhandas et al, Real-Time Extraction and Analysis of Key Morphological Features in the Electrocardiogram, for Data Compression and Clinical Decision Support, 2004, Computational Physiology, pp. 15-18. |
[NPL671] European Office Action in Application 12717020.7 dated Dec. 11, 2015. |
[NPL672] PCT/US2012/034331 International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Oct. 29, 2013. |
[NPL674] Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201280020932.1 dated Jan. 7, 2015. |
[NPL675] Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201280020932.1 dated Apr. 3, 2015. |
[NPL67] U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,490. |
[NPL68] U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,517. |
[NPL693] PCT/US2012/034330, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 28, 2012. |
[NPL699] Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201280020937.4 dated Oct. 22, 2016. |
[NPL700] Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2014-508434 dated Nov. 16, 2015. |
[NPL701] Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2014-508434 dated Dec. 8, 2014. |
[NPL702] Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2014-508434 dated Nov. 4, 2016. |
[NPL703] Office Action in European Application No. 12717019.9 dated Feb. 16, 2017. |
[NPL706] Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201510511657.9 dated May 10, 2017. |
[NPL709] PCT/US2014/065201 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 19, 2016. |
[NPL727] Office Action in European Application No. EP 12717021.5 dated Feb. 3, 2017. |
[NPL735] Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201510593695.3 dated Jul. 12, 2017. |
[NPL748] Office Action in European Application No. EP 12719170.8 dated Jan. 14, 2015. |
[NPL749] Office Action in Japanese Application No. JP 2014-508437 dated Dec. 8, 2014. |
[NPL757] U.S. Appl. No. 60/650,497 dated Feb. 7, 2005. |
[NPL81] U.S. Appl. No. 61/480,539 dated Apr. 29, 2011. |
[NPL84] U.S. Appl. No. 61/480,535 dated Apr. 29, 2011. |
[NPL90] Nedelkov, et. al., Design of buffer exchange surfaces and sensor chips for biosensor chip mass spectrometry, Proteomics, 2002, 441-446, 2(4). |
[NPL] European Search Report App 14865374.4, dated Jun. 12, 2017. |
[NPL] European Search Report for Application No. 14865128.4 dated Jun. 20, 2017. |
[NPL] Green et al., Sudden Cardiac Death in Hemodialysis Patients: an In-Depth Review , Am J Kidney Dis 57(6)921:929. |
[NPL] Rajan et al. Generalized Feature Extraction for Time-Varying Autoregressive Models, IEEE Transacion Signal Processing vol. 44, No. 10. |
Chinese Office Action in App. No. 201480059332.5, dated Mar. 30, 2018. |
European Search Report for App. No. 14859115.9, dated Jan. 5, 2018. |
European Search Report for App. No. 17185636.2 dated Jan. 10, 2018. |
European Search Report for App. No. 17190053.3, dated Jan. 2, 2018. |
European Search Report for App. No. 17190066, dated Jan. 16, 2018. |
European Search Report for App. No. 17190084, dated Feb. 9, 2018. |
Laurent, Jeanpierre, “Continuous Monitoring of Dynamic Systems: Application to Monitoring of Dialyzed Patients” Oct. 30, 2004, received from internet: http://laurent.jeanpierre1.free.fr/recherche/papiers/aista2004.pdf. |
PCT/US2016/058579 International Search Report dated Jan. 31, 2017. |
PCT/US2016/058579_WO. |
PCT/US2017/025868 International Search Report dated Jun. 29, 2017. |
PCT/US2017/025868 Written Opinion dated Jun. 29, 2017. |
PCT/US2017/030377_ISR. |
PCT/US2017/030377_WO. |
PCTUS2017025858 International Search Report dated Jun. 29, 2017. |
PCTUS2017025858 Written Opinion dated Jun. 29, 2017. |
PCTUS2017025876 International Search Report dated Jun. 29, 2017. |
PCTUS2017025876 Written Opinion dated Jun. 29, 2017. |
Wollenstein, et al, “Colorimetric gas sensors for the detection of ammonia, nitrogen dioxide, and carbon monoxide: current status and research trends”, Sensor and Test Conference 2011, Jan. 2, 2011, pp. 562-567. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180353136 A1 | Dec 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61899875 | Nov 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14539437 | Nov 2014 | US |
Child | 16106189 | US |