The present invention relates to a method and equipment for characterizing the surface of solid materials.
The aim of the invention is particularly, but not restrictively, that of characterizing adsorption properties and catalytic activity properties of powder materials used in various gas treatment applications, for example for depollution purposes.
Characterizing such properties is currently difficult. In the case of the determination of the specific surface area of an adsorbent, for example, numerous methods are based on measurements of quantities of gas adsorbed and desorbed with a sample of the material to be characterized, by means of the frequently difficult use of ad hoc specific equipment.
Recently, US-A-2007/0092974 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,808,928 suggested characterizing the adsorption properties of a material by measuring the changes in temperature when the material is placed in contact with a gaseous adsorbent: indeed, these changes in temperature are associated with the physical adsorption and desorption phenomena between the adsorbent and the adsorbate.
Although this idea is appealing, the process suggested by said document is both difficult to implement and inaccurate: indeed, this document envisages placing the material in a tight chamber, before allowing the gaseous adsorbate flowing on contact with the material into the chamber, fluidizing said adsorbate at least partially if applicable, whereas the heat fluxes from the material during the adsorption and desorption phenomena are observed through a transparent window.
The aim of the present invention is that of providing a method and equipment that are easier to implement, while producing reliable and accurate results.
For this purpose, the invention relates to a method for characterizing the surface of solid materials, as defined in claim 1.
The invention also relates to equipment for characterizing the surface of solid materials, as defined in claim 16.
The underlying idea of the invention is that of trying to create intimate, and thus effective, contact between probe molecules and the grains of a powder material to be characterized, and, under these conditions, favoring the detection of thermal phenomena on the surface of these grains, associated with physical, chemical or physico-chemical interaction between the material and the probe molecule. For this purpose, the material and probe molecule are caused to interact by means of percolation, i.e. by having a gas flow containing the probe molecules pass through the powder material: the gas mixture containing these probe molecules thus flows into the free spaces between the grains of the material in contact with each other. Moreover, unlike a fluidization gas flow, the percolation gas flow offers the noteworthy advantage of somewhat thermally insulating the material interacting with the probe molecules, due to the low heat conductivity of the gas mixture in which the grains of the material are “immersed”. This thermal insulation, by the percolation gas mixture, of the interactions between the material and the probe molecules renders the thermal surface phenomena arising from said interaction readily and effectively detectable. The processing of these “thermal responses”, particularly by infrared thermography, makes it possible to deduce, typically with suitable calculations, surface characteristics relating to the material, with remarkable accuracy and reliability. Examples of this are given hereinafter.
It should be noted that, according to the invention, the term “powder material” does not refer to a pre-existing strict classification relating to powders. On the contrary, the invention applies generally to materials having a finely divided or porous solid structure, for treating the grains thereof in contact with each other by gas percolation.
In practice, the invention is particularly each to implement. In particular, it does not require tight confinement of the material to be characterized and thermal response measurements are made by means of direct observations of the material during gas percolation. It is thus understood that the corresponding procedure times are short and can be carried out in quick succession: as such, the term “high-speed” surface characterization can be used. The implementation of the invention thus proves to be economical, particularly as small quantities of the materials to be characterized and the gas mixtures used are sufficient to provide reliable and significant data, in view of the accuracy of the thermal responses obtained and the performance of the measurements relating to these thermal responses. Typically, the mass of the material characterized in this way is less than 100 mg.
As explained in more detail hereinafter, the invention applies to various material/probe material pairings: absorbent/adsorbate, oxidant/reduction agent, acid/base and base/acid pairings are thus envisaged. In this way, according to the circumstances, the surface characteristic deduced relates, among other things, to the physical adsorption properties or the oxidation-reduction catalytic activity of the material to be characterized. Moreover, according to the envisaged applications, the effect of additional operating parameters may be taken into account by the invention. This particularly applies to the material temperature, by means of suitable heat regulation, as mentioned in more detail hereinafter.
Advantageous additional features of the method and equipment according to the invention, taken alone or according to any technical possible combinations, are specified in dependent claims 2 to 15 and 17 to 20.
The invention will be understood more clearly on reading the following description, given as a non-limiting illustration, with reference to the figures wherein:
The equipment according to the invention, illustrated schematically in
Each well 4 is suitable for receiving a material to be characterized M therein. In practice, this material M is provided in powder form deposited on the base 4A of the well 4, with the insertion of a sintered support member 8 extending through the opening of the conduit 6 in the well 4.
The sintered members 8 have a porosity selected such that the member supports the powder material M mechanically, without said material penetrating the pores of the sintered member and such that the sintered member is not gas-tight, i.e. that said sintered member is suitable for being passed from one end to the other by a gas flow. Typically, the pores of the sintered members 8 are in the region of one micron in size.
Advantageously, the block 2 is thermostatically controlled, i.e. the operating temperature thereof can be set to an adjustable value, by means of a thermostat referenced 10 in
It is understood that the material forming the block 2 is selected, among other things, according to the heat regulation requirements for the various wells 4. In the example illustrated, this block 2 is in the form of one piece, made of stainless steel: in this case, the regulated temperature range may be between 25 and 550° C. If this temperature reaches 1200° C., ceramics can be used, with the block 2 being comparable to a kiln in this case.
The equipment according to the invention also comprises an infrared camera 12 wherein the lens 14 is arranged facing the face 2A of the block 2. This camera may be positioned such that the optical axis thereof is perpendicular to the face 2A of the block: in this case, the thermographic measurement is made using a mirror positioned at 45° above the face 2A, suitable for reflecting the heat radiation toward the camera. This design makes it possible to protect the camera in the event of emissions of corrosive gas or any other corrosive flows liable to damage the integrity of the heat camera.
The camera 12 is suitable for detecting radiation in the infrared range, typically equivalent to the spectral ranges between 7.5 and 13 μm, and producing images of said radiation. In operation, these images are sent to computer processing means, not shown, capable of determining a representative value of the temperature of the object emitting the radiation detected by the camera 12. More specifically, in order to obtain an absolute temperature value using the camera 12, it is necessary for the emissivity observed to be known or measured beforehand by means of suitable radiative calibration. In practice, it is not necessary to know the absolute temperature if the data measured is processed by means of mutual comparison, as explained in detail hereinafter. Similarly, the grayscale camera signal can also be used.
For example, the camera 12 is a camera marketed by FLIR Systems, under the reference “ThermoVision A20M”, wherein the output signals are processed by “ThermaCAM Researcher” (registered trademark) software.
As shown in
In practice, the gas mixture G is supplied in various ways. A first solution consists of using a source of this mixture, suitable for direct connection at the input of the circuit 16. A further solution, shown in
Before describing specific examples of use of the equipment in
Via suitable control of one of the electrovalves 20, the corresponding inlet 18 supplies the base 4A of the associated well 4 with gas mixture G. After passing through the sintered member 8, this gas mixture reaches the powder material M and progresses in the thickness thereof, flowing into the free spaces between the grains of said material, until it has passed through the entire material. In other words, within the well 4, gas percolation of the powder material M is carried out. The probe molecules S contained in the gas mixture then interact with the grains of material M: this interaction may, according to the circumstances, be physical, chemical or physico-chemical in nature. In any case, the thermal phenomena associated with this interaction are of interest. In other words, depending on whether this interaction is exothermic or endothermic, the grains of powder material M jointly emit, from the surface thereof, a radiative heat flux, as shown by the arrow F in
This heat flux F is detected by the camera 12 and thus processed by computer processing means connected to the camera, to determine a representative value of the surface temperature of the material M arising from the interaction thereof with the probe molecule S: in this context, the heat flow F displays a remarkable quality, associated with the intimate percolation contact between the grains of material and the gas mixture G containing the probe molecules and with the heat insulation of the interaction between the material and the probe molecules, by the percolation gas phase wherein the material M is “immersed”.
In practice, the quantity of material M present in the well 4 is small: it is typically less than 100 mg. Furthermore, it is understood that the flow rate of the gas mixture G in the inlet 18 is selected at a sufficiently low level to obtain the desired percolation effect, particularly preventing the gas mixture from being able to lift or move the grains of material M resting in the base 4A of the well and remaining in continuous contact with each other: the gas flow rate from the inlet 18 is typically less than 100 ml/min, or between 10 and 70 ml/min. Advantageously, the sintered member 8 helps homogenize the flow of the flux of gas mixture G just before it reaches and passes through the material M. Indeed, due to the small dimensions of the well 4, particularly of the conduit 6 which is in the region of one millimeter in diameter, the flow of gas mixture G is laminar and focused at the opening of the conduit 6 into the well 4: the sintered member 8 makes it possible to create turbulences in the gas mixture flux and also enables spreading thereof on the site of the material M facing said sintered member. In other words, the sintered element 8 “breaks” the flux of gas mixture G entering the well 4, by homogenizing the flux throughout the diameter of the well at the material M.
The method described above for one of the wells 4 can be carried out for all the wells 4, either concomitantly for at least some thereof, as for examples 1, 2 and 4 detailed hereinafter, or sequentially for at least some thereof, as for example 3 hereinafter. Obviously, the camera 12 has a sufficient spatial resolution to differentiate the respective heat fluxes F from the various wells 4, so as to process the data corresponding to each of these fluxes F separately.
Advantageously, during the use of the equipment in
If applicable, the heat regulation of the block 2 is active during the use of the equipment: while the gas mixture G percolates through the material M, the overall temperature of the material is set to a value adjusted using the thermostat 10, it being understood that the thermal surface phenomena, arising from the interaction between the material M and the probe molecule S, overlaps with the overall temperature of the material regulated in this way. In practice, this heat regulation can, over time, be static, as in example 1 hereinafter, or dynamic, either by means of a gradient, as in examples 2 and 4 hereinafter, or in successive stages, as in example 3 hereinafter.
Obviously, the equipment according to the invention is advantageously controlled with a control interface, such as a “Labview” interface. This control interface controls the circuit 16, particularly the electrovalves 20 and, if applicable, the unit 24 for producing probe molecules S and the thermostat 10.
The method and equipment according to the invention may be applied to various material M/probe molecule S pairings depending on the surface characterization sought, particularly depending on whether this characterization relates to the physical adsorption properties of the material, the oxidation-reduction catalytic activity of the material, or the acid or base functions of the material.
A preferential list of inorganic materials M is as follows: alumina, silica, zeolite, aluminosilicate minerals, rare earth oxides (cerium, lanthanum, praesodymium, zirconium, etc., alone or in a mixture) and any of the above-mentioned materials charged with at least one noble metal selected from gold, platinum, palladium, etc.
The material M may also be organic, provided that the morphological features thereof are suitable for the invention (finely divided and/or high-porosity solid): in this case, it particularly consists of polymers (polyamines, polyphosphazenes, phosphorous derivatives) or low molar mass organic molecules.
Similarly, it is possible to characterize hybrid materials, i.e. with both inorganic and organic chemical functions.
For the characterization of physical adsorption properties of the material M, particularly selected from the above list, the measurements with the camera 12 make it possible to deduce, among other things, the ability of the material M to adsorb the probe molecule S, as in example 2 hereinafter, and a specific surface area value for the material M, as in example 1 hereinafter.
For the characterization of the catalytic activity by means of oxidation-reduction of the material M, particularly when said material is selected from the list defined above, the measurements with the camera 12 make it possible to deduce, among other things, the ignition temperature of the probe molecule S in the presence of the material, as in example 3 hereinafter, and a thermal profile of the reducibility of the material M, as in example 4 hereinafter.
Depending on the surface characterization sought, the probe molecule S is preferentially selected from hydrocarbons, fly ash, volatile organic compounds, particularly isopropanol, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carboxylic acids, alkanes, alkynes, alkenes, alcohols, aromatic compounds, thiols, esters, ketones, aldehydes, amides, amines, N-propylamine, particularly isopropylamine, ammonia, lutidine, pyridine, hydrogen, fluorine, neon, nitrile, quinoline, and a mixture of at least some thereof.
In all surface characterization scenarios, the invention advantageously makes it possible to use the same family of probe molecules S, for example various alcohols, while adjusting the length of the hydrocarbon chain of the alcohols: it is thus possible to characterize the impact of the steric size of the probe molecules, depending on whether said probe molecules reach some surface sites of the material M or not, and thus determine a microporosity of said material.
Moreover, in all surface characterization scenarios, a preferential list of carrier gases V is as follows: air, nitrogen, oxygen, argon, helium and a mixture of at least some thereof.
Four examples of embodiments of the invention, particularly using the equipment in
This example relates to the surface characterization of cerium oxide (CeO2), in respect of the physical adsorption properties thereof.
It involves the use of five cerium oxides with an identical particle size, for example 300 μm, but different microporosities, such that they have different respective values for the specific surface area thereof, these values being known in advance for invention performance verification purposes.
For each of these cerium oxides, eighty milligrams of powder is used, distributed in halves into two wells 4 of the block 2.
The probe molecules S used are isopropanol molecules. For example, the gas mixture G is obtained, in the unit 24, by bubbling nitrogen from the source 22, in a liquid isopropanol solution. The quantity of isopropanol vaporized in the unit 24 is regulated by the temperature of said unit. For example, the molar concentration of isopropanol in the gas mixture G used is 8.73%. The gas flow rate through the inlets 18 is equal to 60 ml/min.
The block 2 is heat-regulated at a fixed temperature value which, in practice, may be the ambient temperature, which means that the thermostat 10 is inactivated.
For each of the five pairs of wells 4 containing cerium oxides having different specific surface areas, one of the two wells is supplied with nitrogen containing isopropanol molecules, while the electrovalve 20 of the other well is closed.
Using the camera 12, the radiative heat fluxes F emitted by the wells 4 of each pair are measured.
To demonstrate the performance of the invention,
In view of the quasiperfect alignment of points P3.1 to P3.5, this infers a clear correlation between the predetermined quantification of the specific surface area of the materials used and the data acquired with the method and equipment according to the invention.
Example 2 relates to the surface characterization of rare earth oxides, in respect of the physical adsorption properties thereof.
The materials used are two different forms of cerium oxide (CeO2) and a composite silicon and zirconium oxide (ZrO2SiO2). The probe molecule S is carbon dioxide, supplied by an ad hoc source.
The same quantity of rare earth oxide, in the region of some tens of milligrams, is placed in the wells 4: two wells, associated in a pair, receive the first form of cerium oxide, two other wells receive the second form of cerium oxide, and two other wells receive the composite silicon and zirconium oxide.
For each pair of wells 4 defined, carbon dioxide is sent through the bottom 4A of one of the wells, whereas the other well is not flushed with the gas.
This observation is explained by the temperature conditions in which the measurements are made: indeed, the temperature of the block 2 is regulated, so as to follow a rising gradient, which is linear over time, such that said temperature progressively changes from 150° C. to 250° C. In this way, in view of the presence of the exothermic peaks C4.10 and C4.20, it can be inferred that both forms of cerium oxide adsorb carbon dioxide at different respective overall temperatures, and, at a slightly higher temperature, they desorb the carbon dioxide molecules previously adsorbed.
On the other hand, the composite silicon and zirconium oxide does not have the ability to adsorb carbon dioxide, regardless of the overall temperature thereof in the tested range.
This example relates to the surface characterization of various rare earth oxides, in respect of the isopropanol oxidation potential thereof.
In this example, the carrier gas of the gas mixture is air and the isopropanol concentration is 8.7%.
The curves C5.1 to C5.6 are obtained while the overall temperature of the oxides used changes: this overall temperature changes from 120 to 300° C., in incremental stages of 5°. At each temperature stage, once the value thereof has stabilized, the gas mixture containing isopropanol molecules is allowed to enter, sequentially, each of the wells 4 respectively containing the six oxides used: this gas mixture thus flows for a few seconds into a first well 4, and stops in favor of another wells 4, and so on.
In this way, it is possible to deduce a value of the isopropanol ignition temperature with the oxides tested, i.e. the temperature at which the catalytic oxidation with these materials starts. Indeed, this catalytic oxidation is an exothermic reaction which, in
This example relates to the surface characterization of rare earth oxides, charged with gold in one case, in respective of the reducibility thereof.
The gas mixture used in this case consists of nitrogen containing isopropanol probe molecules.
Each material characterized is placed, with a quantity of 20 mg, in two wells 4: one of these wells is supplied, continually over time, with said gas mixture, whereas the gas mixture does not flow through the other well so that it serves as a comparative reference for the first well.
Moreover, the temperature of the block 2 is regulated so as to follow a rising gradient, which is linear over time, for example 3° C./minute, the overall temperature of the characterized materials thus changing from 120° C. to 500° C.
For each characterized material, the camera 12 is used to measure the respective thermal responses of the well 4 supplied with gas mixture and the reference well not supplied with gas. It is thus possible to represent the time differential (dAT) of the difference of the two thermal measurements mentioned above, as a function of the temperature of the reference well, which is directly linked with the set-point temperature of the thermostat 10 of the block 2. The four curves, respectively associated with the four materials to be characterized, are shown in
Each curve C6.1, C6.2, C6.3, C6.4 represents the oxygen atoms that the characterized material is capable of releasing, as a function of the overall temperature thereof. In other words, these curves consist of thermal profiles of the reducibility of the materials used.
In this way, each of the curves mentioned above has a vertex, referenced C6.11, C6.21, C6.31, C6.41 respectively, wherein the temperature consists of the temperature at which the corresponding material is capable of releasing the most oxygen atoms to oxidize the isopropanol probe molecules:
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09 58756 | Dec 2009 | FR | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/FR2010/052644 | 12/8/2010 | WO | 00 | 10/26/2012 |